Knowledge

Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986

Source 📝

25: 93: 231:
Divorced women are entitled to maintenance from their former husband not only for the iddat period but also to reasonable and fair provisions for future maintenance. S.3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act has to be given under the liberal interpretation to help divorced women.
191:
According to the Statement of Objects and Reasons of this Act, when a Muslim divorced woman is unable to support herself after the iddat period that she must observe after the death of her spouse or after a divorce, during which she may not marry another man, the magistrate is empowered to make an
223:
The provision in question is Section 3(1)(a) of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 which states that "a reasonable and fair provision and maintenance to be made and paid to her within the iddah period by her former husband". The Court held this provision means that
220:, which prevent discrimination on the basis of sex, and held that the intention of the framers could not have been to deprive Muslim women of their rights. Further, the Supreme Court construed the statutory provision in such a manner that it does not fall foul of Articles 14 and 15. 240:
The Act is declaratory & retrospective in its operation. Even if the wife is divorced prior to the commencement of the Act, her former husband is liable to provide reasonable and fair provision and maintenance to her. Hyder Khan v. Mehrunnisa(1993)1 APLJ 82 DNC (KER)
228:, the Supreme Court held that a Muslim divorced woman who has no means to maintain herself is entitled to get maintenance from her former husband even after the period of iddah and she can claim the same under S.125 CrPC. 224:
reasonable and fair provision and maintenance is not limited for the iddah period (as evidenced by the use of word "within" and not "for"). It extends for the entire life of the divorced wife until she remarries. In
120:
An Act to protect the right of Muslim women who have been divorced by, or have obtained divorce from, their husbands and to provide for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.
184:. As per the Act, a divorced Muslim woman is entitled to reasonable and fair provision and maintenance from her former husband, and this should be paid within the period of 676: 296: 334: 537: 691: 625: 196:. But when a divorced woman has no such relatives, and does not have the means to pay the maintenance, the magistrate would order the State 706: 696: 711: 686: 200:
Board to pay the maintenance. The liability of the husband to pay the maintenance was thus restricted to the period of the iddah only.
484: 465: 701: 657: 68: 46: 181: 258: 389: 192:
order for the payment of maintenance by her relatives who would be entitled to inherit her property on her death according to
606: 587: 566: 547: 526: 505: 716: 212:
period very broadly to include amounts worth hundreds of thousands of rupees. More recently, the Supreme Court in
39: 33: 169:
women who have been divorced from their husband and to provide for related matters. The Act was passed by the
681: 50: 422: 282: 217: 132: 162: 142: 100: 653: 647: 621: 602: 583: 562: 543: 522: 501: 480: 461: 455: 208:
High Courts have interpreted "just and fair provision" that a woman is entitled to during her
364: 348: 417:"Muslim Women Protection of Rights on Divorce Act 1986" (2015). Eastern Book Company: 1–10. 335:"Arif Mohammad Khan on Shah Bano case: 'Najma Heptullah was key influence on Rajiv Gandhi'" 435: 268: 180:
It is administered by any magistrate of the first class exercising jurisdiction under the
477:
Inscribing South Asian Muslim women : an annotated bibliography & research guide
643: 577: 670: 170: 297:"Triple Talaq: Abolishing the practice will grant Muslim men divorce with dignity" 516: 495: 193: 111: 92: 321: 263: 174: 404:
Muslim Women (Prot. of Rights on Div.) Act, 1986 with Rules - (Bare Act)
173:
government, with its absolute majority, to nullify the decision in the
166: 209: 185: 521:(Repr., with updated epilogue. ed.). New Delhi: Left Word. 197: 599:
The claims of culture equality and diversity in the global era
177:
case, and diluted the secular judgement of the Supreme Court.
18: 649:
Utopias in Conflict: Religion and Nationalism in Modern India
390:"How the Indian Left lost the plot on the uniform civil code" 618:
Altered Destinations: Self, Society, and Nation in India
322:
The politics of autonomy : Indian experiences 2005
86:
Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986
159:
The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act
309: 652:. University of California Press. pp. 107–111. 138: 128: 99: 85: 497:The politics of autonomy : Indian experiences 559:The Muslims of India : a documentary record 518:The RSS and the BJP : a division of labour 454:Lawrence, Bruce B.; Karim, Aisha, eds. (2007). 232:K. Zunaideen v. Ameena Begum (1998) 1 ctc 566. 8: 216:read the Act with Articles 14 and 15 of the 557:Noorani, Abdul Gafoor Abdul Majeed (2003). 283:"From Shah Bano to Salma - Indian Express" 69:Learn how and when to remove this message 601:. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. 32:This article includes a list of general 250: 117: 500:(1. publ. ed.). New Delhi: Sage. 431: 420: 82: 7: 677:Acts of the Parliament of India 1986 561:. New Delhi : Oxford Univ. Press. 460:. Durham : Duke University Press. 38:it lacks sufficient corresponding 14: 165:in 1986 to protect the rights of 542:. New Delhi: Ashish Pub. House. 406:(2015 ed.). EBC. p. 3. 350:Danial Lathifi Vs Union of India 182:Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 91: 23: 494:Samaddar, Ranabir, ed. (2005). 353:. supreme court judgment. 2001. 267:. 7 August 2000. Archived from 214:Danial Latifi v. Union of India 259:"Maintenance for Muslim women" 1: 616:Makarand R Paranjape (2009). 479:( ed.). Leiden: Brill. 365:"Shabana Bano Vs Imran Khan" 707:Law about religion in India 697:Rajiv Gandhi administration 582:. New York: Facts on File. 733: 692:Women's rights legislation 310:On violence: a reader 2007 576:Walsh, Judith E. (2006). 226:Shabana Bano v Imran Khan 161:was an act passed by the 148: 106: 90: 702:Muslim politics in India 597:Benhabib, Seyla (2002). 579:A brief history of India 712:1986 in women's history 687:Women's rights in India 515:Noorani, A. G. (2001). 53:more precise citations. 644:Embree, Ainslie Thomas 475:Aftab, Tahera (2008). 430:Cite journal requires 536:Jindal, T.P. (1995). 457:On violence: a reader 218:Constitution of India 717:Divorce law in India 271:on 2 September 2015. 163:Parliament of India 143:Parliament of India 101:Parliament of India 312:, p. 262-265. 299:. 10 October 2016. 133:Act No. 25 of 1986 16:Indian federal law 627:978-1-84331-797-5 539:Ayodhya imbroglio 156: 155: 79: 78: 71: 724: 663: 631: 620:. Anthem Press. 612: 593: 572: 553: 532: 511: 490: 471: 440: 439: 433: 428: 426: 418: 414: 408: 407: 400: 394: 393: 386: 380: 379: 377: 375: 361: 355: 354: 345: 339: 338: 331: 325: 324:, p. 60-63. 319: 313: 307: 301: 300: 293: 287: 286: 279: 273: 272: 255: 95: 83: 74: 67: 63: 60: 54: 49:this article by 40:inline citations 27: 26: 19: 732: 731: 727: 726: 725: 723: 722: 721: 667: 666: 660: 642: 639: 637:Further reading 634: 628: 615: 609: 596: 590: 575: 569: 556: 550: 535: 529: 514: 508: 493: 487: 474: 468: 453: 449: 444: 443: 429: 419: 416: 415: 411: 402: 401: 397: 388: 387: 383: 373: 371: 363: 362: 358: 347: 346: 342: 333: 332: 328: 320: 316: 308: 304: 295: 294: 290: 281: 280: 276: 257: 256: 252: 247: 238: 206: 139:Enacted by 124: 121: 116: 115: 75: 64: 58: 55: 45:Please help to 44: 28: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 730: 728: 720: 719: 714: 709: 704: 699: 694: 689: 684: 682:Islam in India 679: 669: 668: 665: 664: 658: 638: 635: 633: 632: 626: 613: 607: 594: 588: 573: 567: 554: 548: 533: 527: 512: 506: 491: 486:978-9004158498 485: 472: 467:978-0822390169 466: 450: 448: 445: 442: 441: 432:|journal= 409: 395: 381: 356: 340: 326: 314: 302: 288: 274: 249: 248: 246: 243: 237: 234: 205: 202: 154: 153: 146: 145: 140: 136: 135: 130: 126: 125: 123: 122: 119: 109: 108: 107: 104: 103: 97: 96: 88: 87: 77: 76: 31: 29: 22: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 729: 718: 715: 713: 710: 708: 705: 703: 700: 698: 695: 693: 690: 688: 685: 683: 680: 678: 675: 674: 672: 661: 659:9780520068667 655: 651: 650: 645: 641: 640: 636: 629: 623: 619: 614: 610: 604: 600: 595: 591: 585: 581: 580: 574: 570: 564: 560: 555: 551: 545: 541: 540: 534: 530: 524: 520: 519: 513: 509: 503: 499: 498: 492: 488: 482: 478: 473: 469: 463: 459: 458: 452: 451: 446: 437: 424: 413: 410: 405: 399: 396: 391: 385: 382: 370: 369:supreme court 366: 360: 357: 352: 351: 344: 341: 336: 330: 327: 323: 318: 315: 311: 306: 303: 298: 292: 289: 284: 278: 275: 270: 266: 265: 260: 254: 251: 244: 242: 235: 233: 229: 227: 221: 219: 215: 211: 204:Personal laws 203: 201: 199: 195: 189: 187: 183: 178: 176: 172: 168: 164: 160: 151: 147: 144: 141: 137: 134: 131: 127: 118: 114: 113: 105: 102: 98: 94: 89: 84: 81: 73: 70: 62: 52: 48: 42: 41: 35: 30: 21: 20: 648: 617: 598: 578: 558: 538: 517: 496: 476: 456: 423:cite journal 412: 403: 398: 384: 372:. Retrieved 368: 359: 349: 343: 329: 317: 305: 291: 277: 269:the original 262: 253: 239: 230: 225: 222: 213: 207: 190: 179: 171:Rajiv Gandhi 158: 157: 149: 110: 80: 65: 59:January 2014 56: 37: 51:introducing 671:Categories 608:0691048630 589:1438108257 568:0195661583 549:8170246792 528:8187496134 507:0761934537 374:28 January 245:References 194:Muslim Law 112:Long title 34:references 264:The Hindu 175:Shah Bano 646:(1990). 152:In force 129:Citation 447:Sources 150:Status: 47:improve 656:  624:  605:  586:  565:  546:  525:  504:  483:  464:  167:Muslim 36:, but 236:Notes 210:iddat 186:iddat 654:ISBN 622:ISBN 603:ISBN 584:ISBN 563:ISBN 544:ISBN 523:ISBN 502:ISBN 481:ISBN 462:ISBN 436:help 376:2014 198:Waqf 673:: 427:: 425:}} 421:{{ 367:. 261:. 188:. 662:. 630:. 611:. 592:. 571:. 552:. 531:. 510:. 489:. 470:. 438:) 434:( 392:. 378:. 337:. 285:. 72:) 66:( 61:) 57:( 43:.

Index

references
inline citations
improve
introducing
Learn how and when to remove this message

Parliament of India
Long title
Act No. 25 of 1986
Parliament of India
Parliament of India
Muslim
Rajiv Gandhi
Shah Bano
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
iddat
Muslim Law
Waqf
iddat
Constitution of India
"Maintenance for Muslim women"
The Hindu
the original
"From Shah Bano to Salma - Indian Express"
"Triple Talaq: Abolishing the practice will grant Muslim men divorce with dignity"
On violence: a reader 2007
The politics of autonomy : Indian experiences 2005
"Arif Mohammad Khan on Shah Bano case: 'Najma Heptullah was key influence on Rajiv Gandhi'"
Danial Lathifi Vs Union of India
"Shabana Bano Vs Imran Khan"

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.