Knowledge (XXG)

Magnan v. Anaconda Industries, Inc.

Source 📝

105:
The Court held that the obligation of good faith and fair dealing is a rule of construction, designed to fulfill the reasonable expectations of the contracting parties, and that, unless the terms of the contract are contrary to public policy, the good faith principle cannot be applied to achieve a
96:
The employer argued that good faith was an "amorphorous" concept, that would only lead juries to usurp managerial decisions, "guided by vague concepts of public morality rather than principles of law."
89:. He was discharged for allegedly for breaching his duty of loyalty in preventing theft of company property. He argued that the employer was in breach of contract, through breach of the duty of 126:, required "some reasonable and sufficient cause or matter" to justify firing an employee. Originally English courts treated an employment to last for one year, where the contract was silent. 163: 158: 168: 109:
Although employment contracts were not exempt from the implied term of good faith, that term did not require good cause for dismissal.
178: 173: 29: 123: 82: 86: 67: 93:. This, he argued, entailed the principle that no employee would be sacked without good cause. 79: 183: 152: 118: 63: 90: 49: 106:
result contrary to the clearly expressed terms of the contract.
43: 35: 25: 20: 8: 17: 62:193 Conn. 558, 479 A.2d 781 (1984) is a 7: 59:Magnan v. Anaconda Industries, Inc 39:193 Conn. 558, 479 A.2d 781 (1984) 21:Magnan v. Anaconda Industries, Inc 14: 66:case, concerning the doctrine of 164:1984 in United States case law 78:George Magnan was employee of 1: 159:United States labor case law 30:Supreme Court of Connecticut 200: 169:Connecticut state case law 48: 124:Statute of Laborers 1562 179:Ansonia, Connecticut 87:Ansonia, Connecticut 80:Anaconda Industries' 174:1984 in Connecticut 143:Master and Servant 68:employment at will 55: 54: 191: 18: 199: 198: 194: 193: 192: 190: 189: 188: 149: 148: 138: 133: 115: 103: 76: 12: 11: 5: 197: 195: 187: 186: 181: 176: 171: 166: 161: 151: 150: 147: 146: 137: 134: 132: 129: 128: 127: 121: 114: 111: 102: 99: 75: 72: 53: 52: 46: 45: 41: 40: 37: 33: 32: 27: 23: 22: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 196: 185: 182: 180: 177: 175: 172: 170: 167: 165: 162: 160: 157: 156: 154: 144: 140: 139: 135: 130: 125: 122: 120: 117: 116: 112: 110: 107: 100: 98: 94: 92: 88: 84: 83:brass factory 81: 73: 71: 69: 65: 61: 60: 51: 47: 42: 38: 34: 31: 28: 24: 19: 16: 142: 119:US labor law 108: 104: 95: 77: 64:US labor law 58: 57: 56: 15: 153:Categories 136:References 91:good faith 50:Good faith 113:See also 101:Judgment 44:Keywords 36:Citation 145:(1877) 141:Wood, 131:Notes 74:Facts 26:Court 184:ARCO 85:in 155:: 70:.

Index

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Good faith
US labor law
employment at will
Anaconda Industries'
brass factory
Ansonia, Connecticut
good faith
US labor law
Statute of Laborers 1562
Categories
United States labor case law
1984 in United States case law
Connecticut state case law
1984 in Connecticut
Ansonia, Connecticut
ARCO

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.