29:
262:
The Court held that section 23 guarantees representation on the school board and exclusive control over the children's education with respect to culture, or it can guarantee a separate school board. However, there must be sufficient minority language population to warrant either level of protection.
204:
The
Minister of Education told them that it was not its policy to make such arrangements and so it suggested that they try to do so through the public school board. The board rejected them. Mahé and the others brought an action against the Alberta government for violating their right to a
283:
156:
242:
279:
278:
of Canada, and their respective cultures." The section is intended to be remedial to prevent the loss of a minority group's language and cultural identity and so it must be interpreted in light of
263:
In this particular case, the Court decided representation on an existing school board would be sufficient and held that did not interfere with denominational school rights under section 29 of the
227:
323:
54:
Jean‑Claude Mahé, Angeline Martel, Paul Dubé and the
Association de l'Ă©cole Georges et Julia Bugnet v Her Majesty The Queen in right of the province of Alberta
169:
in each province to have the right either to be represented on the school board or to have a school board of their own to provide adequate protection for the
348:
223:
Do the rights under section 23 include the right to manage and control the schools? If so, what is the nature and extent of the management and control?
161:
328:
338:
343:
373:
333:
368:
148:
398:
383:
358:
388:
378:
363:
105:
403:
353:
393:
308:
300:
152:
34:
238:
28:
185:
citizens, Jean-Claude Mahé, Angeline Martel and Paul Dubé, were dissatisfied with the quality of the
304:
170:
101:
275:
121:
194:
166:
193:
government. In 1982, they submitted a proposal to the
Minister of Education for a new French
113:
186:
216:
Have the rights of the
Francophone population of Edmonton under section 23(2)(b) of the
317:
271:
97:
93:
86:
60:
274:. He began by examining the purpose of section 23, to "preserve and promote the two
198:
109:
197:
that would be administered by a committee of parents within an autonomous French
250:
226:
Does the provincial School Act violate section 23? If so, can it be saved under
117:
182:
190:
155:. The ruling is notable because the court established that
270:
The Court's unanimous decision was given by Chief
Justice
205:
Francophone-run education system under section 23 of the
132:
127:
77:
69:
59:
49:
42:
21:
324:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms case law
237:Are the rights affected by section 93 of the
212:The questions before the Supreme Court were:
8:
162:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
18:
7:
349:French-language education in Canada
267:since it affected merely language.
14:
27:
1:
329:Supreme Court of Canada cases
339:Education case law in Canada
16:Supreme Court of Canada case
420:
344:Education policy in Canada
173:rights of their children.
167:official-language minority
374:Language policy in Canada
334:1990 in Canadian case law
82:
26:
369:Minority rights case law
249:, and section 17 of the
189:schools provided by the
165:requires parents of the
45:Judgment: March 15, 1990
399:Franco-Albertan culture
301:Supreme Court of Canada
153:Supreme Court of Canada
43:Hearing: June 14, 1989
35:Supreme Court of Canada
239:Constitution Act, 1867
147:, 1 S.C.R. 342, is a
384:Medium of instruction
106:Claire L'Heureux-Dubé
359:Education in Alberta
258:Opinion of the Court
133:Unanimous reasons by
389:History of Edmonton
73:Mahé appeal allowed
379:Minority languages
364:Alberta litigation
276:official languages
122:Beverley McLachlin
404:Language case law
354:1990 in education
195:elementary school
140:
139:
411:
149:leading decision
114:Charles Gonthier
102:GĂ©rard La Forest
91:Puisne Justices:
78:Court membership
31:
19:
419:
418:
414:
413:
412:
410:
409:
408:
394:1990 in Alberta
314:
313:
296:
260:
187:French-language
179:
89:
44:
38:
17:
12:
11:
5:
417:
415:
407:
406:
401:
396:
391:
386:
381:
376:
371:
366:
361:
356:
351:
346:
341:
336:
331:
326:
316:
315:
312:
311:
295:
294:External links
292:
259:
256:
255:
254:
235:
224:
221:
220:been violated?
178:
175:
144:Mahé v Alberta
138:
137:
134:
130:
129:
125:
124:
84:Chief Justice:
80:
79:
75:
74:
71:
67:
66:
63:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
32:
24:
23:
22:Mahé v Alberta
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
416:
405:
402:
400:
397:
395:
392:
390:
387:
385:
382:
380:
377:
375:
372:
370:
367:
365:
362:
360:
357:
355:
352:
350:
347:
345:
342:
340:
337:
335:
332:
330:
327:
325:
322:
321:
319:
310:
306:
302:
299:Full text of
298:
297:
293:
291:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
272:Brian Dickson
268:
266:
257:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
233:
229:
225:
222:
219:
215:
214:
213:
210:
208:
202:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
176:
174:
172:
168:
164:
163:
158:
154:
150:
146:
145:
135:
131:
128:Reasons given
126:
123:
119:
115:
111:
107:
103:
99:
98:Bertha Wilson
95:
94:Antonio Lamer
92:
88:
87:Brian Dickson
85:
81:
76:
72:
68:
64:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
36:
30:
25:
20:
303:decision at
287:
269:
264:
261:
246:
231:
217:
211:
206:
203:
199:school board
180:
160:
143:
142:
141:
136:Dickson C.J.
110:John Sopinka
90:
83:
65:1 S.C.R. 342
53:
33:
251:Alberta Act
318:Categories
307: and
280:section 15
243:section 29
177:Background
157:section 23
118:Peter Cory
228:section 1
171:education
61:Citations
183:Edmonton
288:Charter
286:of the
265:Charter
247:Charter
245:of the
232:Charter
230:of the
218:Charter
207:Charter
191:Alberta
159:of the
151:of the
309:CanLII
181:Three
70:Ruling
305:LexUM
282:and
320::
290:.
284:27
241:,
209:.
201:.
120:,
116:,
112:,
108:,
104:,
100:,
96:,
253:?
234:?
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
