Knowledge

Management systems for road safety

Source đź“ť

586:
For example, in the UK, Burrough, (1991) indicates that only one-third of the target reduction will be delivered by road safety engineering measures while Koornstra ( 2002) indicates “The contribution of local road engineering to the fatality reductions between 1980 and 2000 are estimated to be 4% for Sweden, 10% for Britain, and 5% for the Netherlands”. Whereas TEC (2003), quotes a research from the Imperial College, London that indicates than the progress in medical technology and care made a significant contribution to the 45% fall of fatalities during the last 20 years, and account for 700 lives saved annually in the UK, and further puts forward that the lack of consideration of the benefits coming from the medical area, suggests that road safety is probably less effective that thought. It is remarkable that implicitly the author of the research doesn't consider medical activities as a component of a road safety management system.
303:
Valle (1992). The result was the design of the control apparatus for this situation, called “Road Safety System”, defined by its components. An informal test of its completeness can be done simply by consider this management system without any of its components, for example if we remove rescue we simply lose opportunities to save human life coming from activities in this area. It can be used as an outline to assess the completeness of national road safety programs.
249:". Vision Zero is conceived from the ethical base that it can never be acceptable that people are killed or seriously injured when moving within the road transport system. It centres around an explicit goal, and develops into a highly pragmatic and scientifically based strategy which challenges the traditional approach to road safety. 690:
Koornstra, 2002. SUNflower: A comparative study of the development of road safety in Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands Matthijs Koornstra (SWOV), David Lynam (TRL), Göran Nilsson (VTI), Piet Noordzij (SWOV), Hans-Erik Pettersson (VTI), Fred Wegman (SWOV), and Peter Wouters (SWOV). SWOV,
585:
The name “Road safety” have conveyed that in this field the activities need to concentrate on items that properly belong to roads and, by extension, to the roads authorities, keeping a reduced scope of activities in a number of different areas, in spite of their potentially significant contributions.
302:
The more extensive effort to obtain a comprehensive, holistic design of a road safety system, with the direct participation of 123 persons, representatives of different areas of activities, was done in Chile, (CONASET, 1993), utilizing the methodology for the design of social systems developed by Del
628:
in road safety, but it is more correct to recognize that road safety activities do not solve problems. For instance, when a safer road design is implemented, hopefully the number of crashes, or their seriousness, will go down, but they will not disappear. It is more correct to say the implementation
598:
The use of the word “accident” with its connotations of being and unavoidable event, weaken the resolve to intervene in order to reduce crashes and the resulting harm. Evans (1991) argues that the word “crash” indicates in a simple factual way what is observed, while “Accident” seems to suggest in
632:
This realization is important, because it changes the focus from a problem that will go away if we devote enough resources to it, to a situation requiring on-going management. This management in turn requires the development of scientifically based techniques, which will enable us to predict with
24:
a widely supported set of beliefs with no real basis. For example, the “accident-prone driver” was a belief that was supported by the data in the sense that a small number of drivers do participate in a disproportionate number of accidents, it follows that the identification and removal of this
589:
It reflects confusion between the space where this phenomenon occurs (mainly roads) and the design of the Management systems to control it, in what “Roads” is only a 11% of the activities (one area out of nine in previous table).
25:
drivers will reduce crashes. A more scientific analysis of the data indicate that this phenomenon can be explained simply by the random nature of the accidents, and not for a specific error-prone attitude of such drivers.
262:
Vehicle speed is the most important regulating factor for a safe road traffic. It should be determined by the technical standard of both roads and vehicle so as not to exceed the level of violence that the human body can
697:
Murray CJL, Lopez AD, eds. The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. Boston, Harvard University Press,
607:
Road safety recognizes that crashes, and their consequences, are multifactor events, Ogden (1996) indicates: “An approach based in notions of cause and blame is simplistic in the extreme”. In short, crashes have
290:
Modern Road Safety makes a distinction between the situation and the management systems necessary to control it, with prevention activities that largely exceeds the self-evident fields of the traditional
280:
If the users fail to comply with these rules due to a lack of knowledge, acceptance or ability, the system designers are required to take the necessary further steps to counteract people being killed or
577:
is handicapped by the terminology. Words have power to them that conveys impressions as well as meanings, phenomena that in this case results in sub-optimal approaches to prevention, as follows:
674: 274:
System designers are responsible for the design, operation and the use of the road transport system and are thereby responsible for the level of safety within the entire system.
267:
While the concept envisages responsibility for safety amongst the designers and users of the system, the designer has the final responsibility for "fail-safe" measures.
687:
Evans, L. (1991) Older drivers risks to themselves and to other road users. Transportation Research Record 1325, 34-41. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
259:
The level of violence that the human body can tolerate without being killed or seriously injured forms the basic parameter in the design of the road transport system.
669:
Ashton, S. J. and G.M. Mackay (1979) Some Characteristics of the Population who Suffer Trauma as Pedestrians When Hit by Cars and Some Resulting Implications, 4th
652: 670: 213:
A prerequisite for progress in this area is to introduce national programs with clear and quantifiable objectives, some examples are:
295:(Engineering, Enforcement, Education) approach, first introduced in 1925. Modern Management systems have the aims of be inclusive, 747: 724:
Silcock, David. Preventing death and injury on the world's roads. Transport Reviews, Volume 23 Number 3, July–September 2003.
684:
Del Valle, Alfredo, 1992. Innovative planning for development: An action-oriented approach. University of Pennsylvania, 1992.
629:
of correct policies, programs and measures will reduce numbers or consequences of crashes, but they will not be ´´solved´´.
742: 678:
Burrough P. Procedure for the Road Safety Audit of Truck Roads Schemes. 10p. (UK Department of Transportation, London)
762: 277:
Road users are responsible for following the rules for using the road transport system set by the system designers.
681:
CONASET 1993, Política Nacional de Seguridad de Tránsito. Comisión Nacional de Seguridad de Tránsito, Chile 1993.
256:
The traffic system has to adapt to take better account of the needs, mistakes and vulnerabilities of road users.
767: 737: 705: 241:
United States No more than 1.0 fatality for every 100 million vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by 2008
647: 721:
Ogden, K. W., 1996 SAFER ROADS, A guide to road safety engineering. Ashgate Publishing Limited.
713:
OECD Road Transport Research: Outlook 2000. CHAPTER V: ROAD SAFETY, (1997 ) Table V.1 Page. 17
710:
Ogden, K. W., 1996 SAFER ROADS, A guide to road safety engineering. Ashgate Publishing Limited.
440: 20:
as can be seen in the next table. Some of them can be referred to as professional folklore,
223: 16:
Progress in the area of prevention is formulated in an environment of beliefs, called
299:
to include explicitly all activities part of such system. Forming an integrated whole
756: 692: 657: 220:
0% growth in fatalities, (down from historical 5-7% annual growth), (CONASET, 1993)
714: 701: 642: 574: 246: 738:
Road Safety Management System - a successful system from a developing country
727:
TEC 2003. Traffic Engineering & Control June 2003, page 200. Hemming Group.
633:
confidence that safety resources are well-spent and likely to be effective.
17: 706:
Unsafe at any speed; the designed-in dangers of the American automobile
310:
definition i.e. it is supposed that is parts form an integrated whole.
307: 232: 245:
Sweden has developed a new concept to improve road safety called "
217: 97:
Advanced technology, systems analysis, sociology, communications
196:
Successive cycles of decrease of health risks and traffic risks
176:
The three E's doctrine, screening of accident prone drivers
193:
Rapid increase of health risk with decreasing traffic risk
94:
Traffic engineering, traffic medicine, advanced statistics
718:
OECD Economic Evaluation of Road Safety Measures (2000).
270:
Vision Zero: system designer has primary responsibility
122:
Transitional problem, passing stage of maladjustment
599:addition a general explanation of why it occurred. 693:http://www.swov.nl/rapport/Sunflower/Sunflower.pdf 190:Gradual increase in traffic risks and health risks 179:Combined samples of measures for diminishing risks 199:Continuous reduction of serious road accidents 125:Individual problem, inadequate moral and skills 653:Work-related road safety in the United States 8: 393:B-5 Supervision of vehicle inspection shops 173:Vehicle codes and inspection, school patrols 306:Please note than the following table is a 162:Programmed efforts, authorised politically 624:Old approaches emphasize the concept of 156:Separate efforts on trial and error basis 528:H6 Register of instructors and examiners 312: 27: 454:C7 Rest areas for drivers and bus stops 159:Co-ordinated efforts on voluntary basis 476:G2 Comprehensive rehabilitation system 429:C Management Of Roads And Public Space 421:F-5 Civil responsibility of the state 226:, 40% reduction in fatalities for 2010 673:International Conference, Gothenburg. 396:B-6 Supervision of maintenance shops 366:E-4 Inspection of transport services 360:E-2 Technical conditions of vehicles 341:A-6 Licensing of practical examiners 326:A-1 Training of professional drivers 238:United Kingdom 33% reduction for 2000 7: 335:A-4 Training of driving instructors 91:Car and road engineering, psychology 516:H2 Drivers and infractions register 321:A Drivers, Training & Licensing 205:From: OECD Road Transport Research 165:Decentralisation, local management 139:Basic statistics, answers on “What” 29:Evolution of road safety paradigms 487:D Management Of Transport Services 363:E-3 Technical conditions of roads 252:Vision Zero: strategic principles 153:Organisational form of safety work 14: 525:H5 Preventive indicators register 513:H1 Integrated information systems 497:D3 Permanent grading of personnel 412:F-2 Efficient infraction systems 347:A-8 Permanent grading of drivers 145:Cost/benefit ratio of means “How” 469:G Accident Control And Insurance 387:B-3 New vehicle’s certification 344:A-7 Driving schools supervision 102:Terms used about unwanted events 409:F-1 Prosecution of infractions 377:B Management Of Vehicle Quality 51:Decennia of dominating position 544:I Education And Communications 503:D5 School children’s transport 500:D4 Dangerous loads and stowing 473:G1 Comprehensive rescue system 314:Road Safety Management System 229:Denmark 40% reduction for 2000 1: 381:B-1 Technical specifications 338:A-5 Licensing of instructors 71:Control of motorised carriage 509:H Research & Information 329:A-2 Training of car drivers 74:Mastering traffic situations 418:F-4 Accident investigation 369:E-5 Pedestrian enforcement 119:Premise concerning unsafety 784: 539: 484: 426: 374: 317: 142:Causes of accidents; “Why” 80:Managing transport system 390:B-4 Technical inspection 85:Main disciplines involved 457:C8 Pedestrian facilities 357:E-1 Drivers enforcement 128:Defective traffic system 491:D1 Remuneration systems 451:C6 Road safety elements 436:C2 Signs & markings 399:B-7 Mechanics Training 182:Networking and pricing 170:Typical countermeasures 136:Data ideals in research 77:Managing traffic system 557:I4 Students protection 554:I3 Didactical materiel 235:65% reduction for 2005 748:World first car death 479:G3 Insurance coverage 463:C10 Land use planning 460:C9 Bicycle facilities 433:C1 Traffic management 415:F-3 Law modification 384:B-2 Safety equipment 332:A-3 Driver’s testing 551:I2 Teachers training 534:H8 Users information 531:H7 Accidents studies 522:H4 Accident register 519:H3 Vehicles register 315: 30: 648:Traffic psychology 603:Cause of accidents 494:D2 Work conditions 313: 286:Management systems 63:1980/85 - present 28: 763:Automotive safety 566: 565: 405:F Judicial Action 209:National programs 203: 202: 148:Multidimensional 114:Suffering, costs 60:1965/70 - 1980/85 57:1925/35 - 1965/70 775: 626:problem-solving 316: 31: 783: 782: 778: 777: 776: 774: 773: 772: 753: 752: 734: 666: 639: 622: 620:Problem-solving 605: 596: 583: 571: 288: 211: 111:Crash, casualty 88:Law enforcement 12: 11: 5: 781: 779: 771: 770: 765: 755: 754: 751: 750: 745: 740: 733: 732:External links 730: 729: 728: 725: 722: 719: 716: 711: 708: 699: 695: 688: 685: 682: 679: 676: 665: 662: 661: 660: 655: 650: 645: 638: 635: 621: 618: 604: 601: 595: 592: 582: 579: 570: 567: 564: 563: 562: 561: 558: 555: 552: 549: 541: 538: 537: 536: 535: 532: 529: 526: 523: 520: 517: 514: 506: 505: 504: 501: 498: 495: 492: 483: 482: 481: 480: 477: 474: 466: 465: 464: 461: 458: 455: 452: 449: 448:C5 Maintenance 446: 445:C4 Black spots 443: 437: 434: 425: 424: 423: 422: 419: 416: 413: 410: 402: 401: 400: 397: 394: 391: 388: 385: 382: 373: 372: 371: 370: 367: 364: 361: 358: 350: 349: 348: 345: 342: 339: 336: 333: 330: 327: 287: 284: 283: 282: 278: 275: 265: 264: 260: 257: 243: 242: 239: 236: 230: 227: 221: 210: 207: 201: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 184: 183: 180: 177: 174: 171: 167: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 150: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 133: 132: 131:Risk exposure 129: 126: 123: 120: 116: 115: 112: 109: 106: 103: 99: 98: 95: 92: 89: 86: 82: 81: 78: 75: 72: 69: 65: 64: 61: 58: 55: 54:1900 - 1925/35 52: 48: 47: 44: 41: 38: 35: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 780: 769: 766: 764: 761: 760: 758: 749: 746: 744: 741: 739: 736: 735: 731: 726: 723: 720: 717: 715: 712: 709: 707: 703: 700: 696: 694: 689: 686: 683: 680: 677: 675: 672: 668: 667: 663: 659: 658:Haddon Matrix 656: 654: 651: 649: 646: 644: 641: 640: 636: 634: 630: 627: 619: 617: 615: 611: 602: 600: 593: 591: 587: 580: 578: 576: 573:The field of 568: 559: 556: 553: 550: 547: 546: 545: 542: 540: 533: 530: 527: 524: 521: 518: 515: 512: 511: 510: 507: 502: 499: 496: 493: 490: 489: 488: 485: 478: 475: 472: 471: 470: 467: 462: 459: 456: 453: 450: 447: 444: 442: 438: 435: 432: 431: 430: 427: 420: 417: 414: 411: 408: 407: 406: 403: 398: 395: 392: 389: 386: 383: 380: 379: 378: 375: 368: 365: 362: 359: 356: 355: 354: 353:E Enforcement 351: 346: 343: 340: 337: 334: 331: 328: 325: 324: 323: 322: 318: 311: 309: 304: 300: 298: 294: 285: 279: 276: 273: 272: 271: 268: 261: 258: 255: 254: 253: 250: 248: 240: 237: 234: 231: 228: 225: 222: 219: 216: 215: 214: 208: 206: 198: 195: 192: 189: 186: 185: 181: 178: 175: 172: 169: 168: 164: 161: 158: 155: 152: 151: 147: 144: 141: 138: 135: 134: 130: 127: 124: 121: 118: 117: 113: 110: 107: 104: 101: 100: 96: 93: 90: 87: 84: 83: 79: 76: 73: 70: 67: 66: 62: 59: 56: 53: 50: 49: 45: 42: 39: 36: 33: 32: 26: 23: 19: 702:Nader, Ralph 631: 625: 623: 613: 609: 606: 597: 588: 584: 572: 560:I5 Campaigns 548:I1 Curricula 543: 508: 486: 468: 441:Safety audit 428: 404: 376: 352: 320: 319: 305: 301: 296: 292: 289: 269: 266: 251: 244: 212: 204: 46:PARADIGM IV 43:PARADIGM III 21: 15: 768:Road safety 743:VISION ZERO 643:Road safety 581:Road safety 575:Road safety 247:Vision Zero 68:Description 40:PARADIGM II 757:Categories 664:References 37:PARADIGM I 569:Semantics 263:tolerate. 105:Collision 18:paradigms 637:See also 610:factors 594:Accident 281:injured. 108:Accident 614:causes 308:systems 233:Finland 187:Effects 34:ASPECTS 691:2002. 671:IRCOBI 698:1996. 218:Chile 612:not 297:i.e. 22:i.e. 439:C3 293:3 E 759:: 704:, 616:. 224:EU

Index

paradigms
Chile
EU
Finland
Vision Zero
systems
Safety audit
Road safety
Road safety
Traffic psychology
Work-related road safety in the United States
Haddon Matrix
IRCOBI

http://www.swov.nl/rapport/Sunflower/Sunflower.pdf
Nader, Ralph
Unsafe at any speed; the designed-in dangers of the American automobile

Road Safety Management System - a successful system from a developing country
VISION ZERO
World first car death
Categories
Automotive safety
Road safety

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑