Knowledge

Mate choice in humans

Source đź“ť

268:, members would derive greater evolutionary advantage from selecting for physical attractiveness/good looks in mate choice compared to that derived by members of societies with lower prevalence. Humans could use physical attractiveness to determine resistance to parasites and diseases, which are believed to lower their sufferers' ability to portray attractive traits from then on and limit the number of high-quality pathogen-resistant mates. In cultures where parasitic infection is especially high, members could use cues available to them to determine the physical health status of the potential mate. Regardless of the wealth or ideology, the females in areas that are more at risk or have higher rates of parasites and diseases would weigh masculinity more highly when rating potential mates. 130:
than men. However, many other traits exist that may act as cues towards a man's ability to provide resources that have been sexually selected for in women's evolutionary history. These include older age—older males have had more time to accrue resources—industriousness, dependability and stability—if a woman's long-term partner is not emotionally stable or is not dependable then their provision of resources to her and her offspring are likely to be inconsistent. Additionally, the costs associated with an emotionally unstable partner such as jealousy and manipulation may outweigh the benefits associated with the resources they are able to provide.
275:: In pre-industrial societies, body markings such as tattoos or scarifications are predicted to have been a way in which individuals could attract potential mates, by indicating the reproductive quality of a person. Meaning, scars on the body could be viewed by prospective mates as evidence that a person has overcome parasites and is thus more attractive to potential mates. Research investigating this hypothesis (Singh and Bronstad 1997) found that in instances of increased pathogen prevalence, the only anatomical area with evidence of scarification in females was found on the stomach, with no evidence found for male scarification. 292:: Tropical areas were originally associated with polygynous societies as a result of the surrounding environment being both ecologically richer and homogeneous. However, whilst tropical areas were associated with polygamy, pathogen stress is predicted as a better indicator of polygamy and has been positively correlated with it. Furthermore, over the course of human evolution, areas which had high levels of parasite-stress may have shifted the polygamy threshold and increased the presence of certain types of polygamy in a society. 83:
phenotypic traits are thought to be selected for as they act as an indication of one of these three major traits. The relative importance of these traits when considering mate selection differ depending on the type of mating arrangement females engage in. Human women typically employ long-term mating strategies when choosing a mate, however they also engage in short-term mating arrangements, so their mate choice preferences change depending on the function of the type of arrangement.
358:
re-runs the analysis of the previous studies. By using the larger data set to conduct analysis on 30 couples of European descent, they generate findings contrary to previous studies that identified significant divergence in the mate choice with accordance to HLA genotyping. Additional studies have been conducted simultaneously on African and European populations that only show correlation of MHC divergence in European but not African populations.
233:: The pigmentation of nipples and breasts appears to be the most important quality of breast attractiveness. Men rated women with dark nipples and dark areola as significantly more attractive than those with light-colored nipppes or areola. Breasts of medium cup size were found to be the most attractive, however authors noted that men focused primarily on the coloration of nipples and areola rather than breast size. 261:) showed that, within one species (brightly colored birds), there was greater sexual selection for males that had brighter plumage (feathers). In addition, Hamilton and Zuk showed that, comparing across multiple species, there is greater selection for physical attributes in species under greater parasitic stress. This has influenced research regarding human mate choice. 104:
men who may capture or sexually coerce them, or status, by providing the woman with a higher social standing. Women may also benefit from having several short-term mating arrangements through paternity confusion—if the paternity of her offspring is not certain, she may be able to accrue resources from several men as a result of this uncertainty.
184:
consensual relationship. Romantic love is the mechanism through which long-term mate choice occurs in human males. For long-term sexual relationships, men are usually equally choosy because they have a similar parental investment like the women, as they heavily invest in the offspring in form of resource provisioning.
150:
When finding a short-term mate, males highly value women with sexual experience and physical attractiveness. Men seeking short-term sexual relationships are likely to avoid women who are interested in commitment or require investment. In short-term sexual relationships, men are less choosy because of
107:
Genetic benefit hypothesis: Women may choose to engage in short-term mating arrangements in order to aid conception if her long-term partner is infertile, to gain superior genes to those of her long-term partner, or to acquire different genes to those of her partner and increase the genetic diversity
103:
Resource hypothesis: Women may engage in short-term mating in order to gain resources that they may not be able to gain from a long-term partner, or that a long-term partner may not be able to provide consistently. These resources may be food, protection for the woman and her children from aggressive
357:
A review article published in June 2018 concluded that there is no correlation between HLA and mate choice. In addition to assessing previous studies on HLA-Mate choice analysis to identify errors in their research methods (such as small population sizes), the study collects a larger set of data and
334:
by testing males' odor preferences on women's odors. The study concludes that there is no correlation in attraction between men and women of dissimilar HLA proteins. Research completed on a Southern Brazilian student population resulted in similar findings that found significant differences in the
329:
In humans, there is evidence that women will rate men's odor as more pleasant if the odor has MHC-dissimilar antigens, which is proposed as a way of avoiding inbreeding and increasing heterozygosity. However, women on contraceptive pills rate the odor of MHC-similar men as being more pleasant, it is
798:
P.1213: "Female faces had greater facial contrast than male faces in both the East Asian and the Caucasian samples, and the East Asian faces (with dark eyes) had greater facial contrast than the Caucasian faces (with lighter eyes). A 2 (sex) 62 (race) analysis of variance (ANOVA) of facial contrast
739:
The luminance of the eyebrows, eyes and mouth is lower than that of the surrounding skin in younger women , and decreasing the luminance of the features and increasing that of overall facial skin makes female faces more attractive and male faces less attractive . Female faces exhibit greater facial
348:
hasn't been correlated with MHC-heterozygosity, the perceived healthiness of skin appears to be. It appears to be that only MHC-heterozygosity and no other genetic markers are correlated with facial attractiveness in males and it has been shown that so far that there is no correlation that has been
220:
Physical beauty: Observable characteristics of a woman can indicate good health and the ability to reproduce, qualities which are likely to be desired by a male. This may include smooth skin, absence of lesions, muscle tone, long hair and high energy levels. Women with darker features (lips, eyes,
115:
Mate expulsion and mate switching: Women may engage in a short-term mating arrangement in order to cause an end to a long-term relationship; in other words, to facilitate a break-up. Women may also use short-term mating if their current partner has depreciated in value, and they wish to 'trade up'
82:
Female mate choice hinges on many different coinciding male traits, and the trade-off between many of these traits must be assessed. The ultimate traits most salient to female human mate choice, however, are parental investment, resource provision and the provision of good genes to offspring. Many
200:
will be passed on to the children of his offspring. Also, a male who is interested in committing to a female may be more attractive to potential mates. A male who can promise resources and future parental investment is likely to be more appealing to women than a male who is unwilling to commit to
191:
Commitment and marriage: A human male may be interested in mating with a female who seeks marriage. This is because he has exclusive sexual access to the female, so any offspring produced in the relationship will be genetically related to him (unless the female has sexual intercourse with another
129:
The provision of economic resources, or the potential to acquire many economic resources, is the most obvious cue towards the ability of a man to provide resources, and women in the United States have been shown experimentally to rate the importance of their partner's financial status more highly
78:
Human female sexual selection can be examined by looking at ways in which males and females are sexually dimorphic, especially in traits that serve little other evolutionary purpose. For example, male traits such as the presence of beards, overall lower voice pitch, and average greater height are
161:
Physical attractiveness: Men who are interested in a short-term sexual relationship are more likely to prioritise information about the body of potential partners, rather than their faces. When finding a female for a short-term relationship, compared with a long-term relationship, males are less
301:
Gangested and Buss (2009) say that research indicates that parasite stress may have only influenced mate choice through females searching for "good genes" which show parasite resistance, in areas which have high prevalence of parasites. John Cartwright also points out that females may be simply
165:
Relaxation of standards: It has been reported that men are more likely to engage in a sexual relationship with women who have lower levels of intelligence, independence, honesty, generosity, athleticism, responsibility and cooperativeness, when this relationship is short-term. Men may be more
343:
Human facial preferences have been shown to correlate with both MHC-similarity and MHC-heterozygosity. Research into MHC-similarity with regards to facial attractiveness is limited. One study found that women may prefer mates with MHC-similar faces, despite evidence that they prefer men with
183:
of reproductive success and non-biological signals, such as the female's willingness to marry. Unlike many animals, humans are not able to consciously display physical changes to their body when they are ready to mate, so they have to rely on other forms of communication before engaging in a
54:
Although human males and females are both selective in deciding with whom to mate, females exhibit more mate choice selectivity than males, as is seen in nature. Relative to most other animals however, female and male mating strategies are found to be more similar to each other. According to
45:
While there are a few common mating systems seen among humans, the amount of variation in mating strategies is relatively large. This is due to how humans evolved in diverse niches that were geographically and ecologically expansive. This diversity, as well as cultural practices and human
227:: A waist-to-hip ratio of 0.7 is an indicator of fertility, lower long-term health risks and suggests that the woman isn't already pregnant. A male is likely to desire these qualities in a mate, as it will increase the chance of survival of any offspring the couple have together. 133:
Women's mate choices will also be constrained by the context in which they are making them, resulting in conditional mate choices. Some of the conditions that may influence female mate choice include the woman's own perceived attractiveness, the woman's personal resources,
317:(HLA) produces proteins that are essential for immune system functioning. The genes of the MHC complex have extremely high variability, assumed to be a result of frequency-dependent parasite-driven selection and mate choice. This is believed to be so it promotes 908:
Antfolk, Jan; Salo, Benny; Alanko, Katarina; Bergen, Emilia; Corander, Jukka; Sandnabba, N. Kenneth; Santtila, Pekka (2015). "Women's and men's sexual preferences and activities with respect to the partner's age: Evidence for female choice".
285:
in their mate preferences. Women look for signs of masculinity in areas such as the voice, face and body shape of males. The face, in particular, may hold several cues for parasitic resistance and has been the subject of most attractiveness
213:: A feminine face can be a signal of youth, which in turn signals strong reproductive value. As a woman gets older, her facial features become less feminine due to ageing. Femininity can also be linked to disease-resistance and high 330:
unknown why women on contraceptive pills rate smell in this way. It was found that when processing MHC-similar smells were processed faster. Contrary to these findings, other studies have found that there is no correlation between
1562:
Probst, F., Fischbacher, U., Lobmaier, J. S., WirthmĂĽller, U., & Knoch, D. (2017). Men's preferences for women's body odours are not associated with human leucocyte antigen. Proceedings. Biological sciences, 284(1864),
740:
contrast at the eyes and mouth than do male faces, to the extent that varying the contrast of an androgynous face while keeping the shape of the face constant can induce the viewer to perceive the face as male or female .
169:
Sexual experience: Many men assume that women who have engaged in sexual experiences beforehand are likely to have a higher sex drive than women who haven't. These women may also be more accessible and require less
79:
thought to be sexually selected traits as they confer benefits to either the women selecting for them, or to their offspring. Experimentally, women have reported a preference for men with beards and lower voices.
119:
Short-term for long-term goals: Women may use short-term sexual relationships in order to assess a mate's value as a long-term partner, or in the hopes that the short-term arrangement will result in one that is
25:
In humans, males and females differ in their strategies to acquire mates and focus on certain qualities. There are two main categories of strategies that both sexes utilize: short-term and long-term. Human
1573:
Santos, Pablo; Schinemann, Juliano; Gabardo, Juarez; Bicalho, Maria (2005). "New evidence that the MHC influences odor perception in humans: a study with 58 Southern Brazilian students".
257:
put stress on the life development of an organism, leading to a change in the appearance of their sexually attractive traits. The initial research on the Hamilton–Zuk hypothesis (see
1659:
Roberts, S. C.; Little, A. C.; Gosling, L. M.; Perrett, D. I.; Carter, V.; Jones, B. C.; Penton-Voak, I. S.; Petrie, M. (2005). "MHC-heterozygosity and human facial attractiveness".
814:
Dixson, Barnaby J.; Grimshaw, Gina M.; Linklater, Wayne L.; Dixson, Alan F. (19 February 2010). "Eye Tracking of Men's Preferences for Female Breast Size and Areola Pigmentation".
302:
avoiding the transmission of parasites to themselves rather than it being them choosing males with good genes and that females look for more than just parasite-resistant genes.
349:
found in females. Slightly different from facial attractiveness, facial masculinity is not shown to correlate with MHC heterogeneity (a common measure of immunocompetence).
221:
eyebrows) relative to their facial skin have been found to be more attractive, as this increases facial contrast (the same features appear to decrease male attractiveness).
281:: In societies where there are high levels of parasites or diseases, the females, as the overall health of members decreases, are predicted to increasingly emphasize 207:: Symmetrical faces have been judged to signal good general health and the ability for a woman to withstand adverse environmental factors, such as illness. 112:; if a woman acquires genes from a high quality male, her offspring will likely have higher mate value, resulting in their increased reproductive success. 158:
Multiple sexual partners: When looking for short-term sexual relationships, men may wish for there to be as little time as possible between each partner.
236:
Youth: Both young and old men are attracted to women in their twenties. Faces that appear younger are usually rated as more attractive by males.
1255:
DeBruine, Lisa M.; Little, Anthony C.; Jones, Benedict C. (2012). "Extending parasite-stress theory to variation in human mate preferences".
1048: 683: 645: 549: 404: 46:
consciousness, have all led to a large amount of variation in mating systems. Below are some of the overarching trends of mate choice.
1126:"The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: cross-cultural variation in women's preferences for masculinized male faces" 166:
accepting of lower standards, than what they usually prefer, because they are not entering a long-term relationship with this person.
496: 1173:
Jones, Benedict C.; Feinberg, David R.; Watkins, Christopher D.; Fincher, Corey L.; Little, Anthony C.; DeBruine, Lisa M. (2012).
331: 310: 1823:"Facial masculinity does not appear to be a condition-dependent male ornament in humans and does not reflect MHC heterozygosity" 1093:"Sex differences in the anatomical locations of human body scarification and tattooing as a function of pathogen prevalence" 1981: 1064:
Ludvico, L.R.; Kurland, J.A. (1995). "Symbolic or not-so symbolic wounds: The behavioral ecology of human scarification".
1516:"The human brain is a detector of chemosensorily transmitted HLA-class I-similarity in same- and opposite-sex relations" 463:
Barber, Nigel (1995). "The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology".
196:. With two married parents investing in the offspring, their chance of survival may increase; therefore the male's 31: 1821:
Zaidi, Arslan; White, Julie; Mattern, Brooke; Liebowitz, Corey; Puts, David; Claes, Peter; Shriver, Mark (2018).
492:"Attractive Women Want it All: Good Genes, Economic Investment, Parenting Proclivities, and Emotional Commitment" 1822: 1467:"Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity?" 367: 314: 1871: 1514:
Pause, B. M.; Krauel, K.; Schraders, C.; Sojka, B.; Westphal, E.; Muller-Ruchholtz, W.; Ferstl, R. (2005).
1416:
Roberts, S. C.; Little, A. C.; Gosling, L. M.; Jones, B. C.; Perrett, D. I.; Carter, V.; Petrie, M (2005).
34:, depends on a variety of factors, such as ecology, demography, access to resources, rank/social standing, 1385: 1124:
DeBruine, Lisa M.; Jones, Benedict C.; Crawford, John R.; Welling, Lisa L. M.; Little, Anthony C. (2010).
936:
Hamilton, William; Zuk, Marlene (1982). "Heritable True Fitness and Bright Birds: A Role for Parasites?".
246: 139: 56: 39: 1892: 1843: 63:, human females display the least variance of the two sexes in their LRS due to their high obligatory 1775: 945: 60: 1390: 224: 135: 109: 64: 1731:"Major histocompatibility complex genes, symmetry, and body scent attractiveness in men and women" 1308:
White, D. R.; Burton, M. L. (1988). "Causes of polygyny: Ecology, economy, kinship, and warfare".
1175:"Pathogen disgust predicts women's preferences for masculinity in men's voices, faces, and bodies" 1729:
Thornhill, R.; Gangestad, S. W.; Miller, R.; Scheyd, G.; McCollough, J. K.; Franklin, M. (2003).
1711: 1641: 1598: 1325: 1290: 961: 789: 445: 372: 1376:
Gangestad, Steven W.; Buss, David M. (1993). "Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences".
1952: 1803: 1703: 1633: 1590: 1545: 1496: 1447: 1282: 1237: 1155: 1044: 1018: 969: 890: 839: 831: 781: 773: 730: 679: 641: 609: 591: 545: 437: 400: 142:. Romantic love is the mechanism through which long-term mate choice occurs in human females. 75:
following birth in order to feed offspring so that their brain can grow to the required size.
989:"Pathogen prevalence predicts human cross-cultural variability in individualism/collectivism" 1942: 1932: 1878: 1829: 1793: 1783: 1762:
Coetzee, V.; Barrett, L.; Greeff, J. M.; Henzi, S. P.; Perrett, D. I.; Wadee, A. A. (2007).
1742: 1695: 1668: 1625: 1582: 1535: 1527: 1486: 1478: 1437: 1429: 1395: 1356: 1317: 1272: 1264: 1227: 1219: 1186: 1145: 1137: 1104: 1073: 1008: 1000: 953: 918: 880: 870: 823: 765: 720: 712: 599: 581: 505: 472: 429: 345: 1616:
Havlicek, Jan; Roberts, S. Craig (2009). "MHC-correlated mate choice in humans: A review".
1976: 1905: 1856: 204: 1779: 949: 885: 858: 1947: 1920: 1798: 1763: 1672: 1540: 1515: 1491: 1466: 1442: 1417: 1232: 1207: 1150: 1125: 1013: 988: 922: 725: 700: 604: 569: 318: 180: 1686:
Lie, H.; Simmons, L.; Rhodes, G. (2008). "Genetic diversity revealed in human faces".
1109: 1092: 859:"Age Limits: Men's and Women's Youngest and Oldest Considered and Actual Sex Partners" 1970: 1699: 1399: 1077: 476: 272: 1715: 1645: 449: 1629: 1602: 1329: 1294: 99:
outlines several hypotheses as to the function of women's short-term mate choices:
1321: 809: 807: 793: 1937: 1788: 1586: 987:
Fincher, Corey; Thornhill, Randy; Murray, Damian; Schaller, Mark (7 June 2018).
282: 278: 27: 19: 1764:"Common HLA alleles associated with health, but not with facial attractiveness" 510: 491: 1268: 827: 586: 217:
levels, which are factors that suggest reproductive value to a potential mate.
210: 96: 875: 835: 777: 595: 1747: 1730: 1191: 1174: 957: 265: 250: 72: 68: 1956: 1807: 1707: 1637: 1594: 1549: 1531: 1482: 1451: 1433: 1361: 1344: 1286: 1241: 1223: 1159: 1141: 1022: 1004: 894: 843: 785: 734: 716: 613: 441: 433: 1500: 973: 753: 289: 254: 214: 965: 754:"A Sex Difference in Facial Contrast and its Exaggeration by Cosmetics" 230: 193: 1277: 705:
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
1041:
Evolution and human behavior: Darwinian perspectives on human nature
1883: 1834: 769: 1872:"No evidence that mate choice in humans is dependent on the MHC" 192:
male outside of the marriage). This increases the likelihood of
35: 335:
attraction ratings of giving to male sweat and MHC-difference.
420:
Collins, Sarah A. (2000). "Men's voices and women's choices".
197: 1870:
Stancu, Mircea; Kloosterman, Wigard; Pulit, Sara (2018).
1345:"Marriage Systems and Pathogen Stress in Human Societies" 1208:"Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes" 1520:
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
1471:
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
1212:
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
1130:
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
993:
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
108:
of her offspring. This relates to what is known as the
1919:
Chaix, Raphaelle; Cao, Chen; Donnelley, Peter (2008).
1206:
Thornhill, R; Gangestad, S. W.; Scheib, J. E. (1999).
570:"Proximate and Ultimate Perspectives on Romantic Love" 116:
and find a partner that they believe has higher value.
822:(1). Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 51–58. 395:
Barrett, Louise; Dunbar, Robin; Lycett, John (2002).
321:
improving the chances of survival for the offspring.
264:
In societies with a high prevalence of parasites or
154:Examples of short-term mating strategies in males: 249:, otherwise known as pathogen stress, states that 676:Evolutionary Psychology, The New Science of Mind 638:Evolutionary Psychology, The New Science of Mind 542:Evolutionary Psychology, The New Science of Mind 162:likely to prioritise factors such as commitment. 799:found significant main effects of sex and race. 1418:"MHC-assortative facial preferences in humans" 490:Buss, David M.; Shackelford, Todd K. (2008). 8: 1043:. Basingstoke: Macmillan. pp. 146–147. 1034: 1032: 701:"Human color in mate choice and competition" 1411: 1409: 1091:Singh, Devendra; Mathew, Bronstad (1997). 1946: 1936: 1921:"Is Mate Choice in Humans MHC-Dependent?" 1882: 1833: 1797: 1787: 1746: 1539: 1490: 1441: 1389: 1360: 1276: 1231: 1190: 1149: 1108: 1012: 884: 874: 724: 699:Rowland, Hannah; Burriss, Robert (2017). 678:. New York: Routledge. pp. 133–162. 640:. New York: Routledge. pp. 163–176. 603: 585: 544:. New York: Routledge. pp. 103–104. 509: 384: 1901: 1890: 1852: 1841: 258: 7: 669: 667: 665: 663: 661: 659: 657: 631: 629: 627: 625: 623: 568:Bode, Adam; Kushnick, Geoff (2021). 563: 561: 535: 533: 531: 529: 527: 525: 523: 521: 390: 388: 764:(8). SAGE Publications: 1211–1219. 752:Russell, Richard (1 January 2009). 179:Humans have the ability to rely on 61:Lifespan Reproductive Success (LRS) 1673:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.09.002 923:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.09.003 14: 1700:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00478.x 1465:Wedekind, C.; Fu¨ri, S. (1997). 311:Major histocompatibility complex 1630:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.007 241:Parasite stress on mate choice 1: 1322:10.1525/aa.1988.90.4.02a00060 1257:Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1110:10.1016/S1090-5138(97)00089-5 397:Human Evolutionary Psychology 344:dissimilar body odors. While 1938:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000184 1789:10.1371/journal.pone.0000640 1661:Evolution and Human Behavior 1400:10.1016/0162-3095(93)90009-7 1097:Evolution and Human Behavior 1078:10.1016/0162-3095(94)00075-i 911:Evolution and Human Behavior 477:10.1016/0162-3095(95)00068-2 1587:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.11.005 816:Archives of Sexual Behavior 1998: 511:10.1177/147470490800600116 306:MHC-correlated mate choice 151:low parental investment. 32:sexual selection in humans 17: 1378:Ethology and Sociobiology 1269:10.1017/s0140525x11000987 1066:Ethology and Sociobiology 1039:Cartwright, John (2000). 828:10.1007/s10508-010-9601-8 587:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.573123 465:Ethology and Sociobiology 1618:Psychoneuroendocrinology 876:10.1177/1474704917690401 1310:American Anthropologist 958:10.1126/science.7123238 863:Evolutionary Psychology 574:Frontiers in Psychology 497:Evolutionary Psychology 399:. Hampshire: Palgrave. 368:Human mating strategies 315:human leukocyte antigen 67:, that is a nine-month 18:For other animals, see 1900:Cite journal requires 1851:Cite journal requires 1532:10.1098/rspb.2005.3342 1483:10.1098/rspb.1997.0204 1434:10.1098/rsbl.2005.0343 1343:Low, Bobbi S. (1990). 1224:10.1098/rspb.1999.0866 1142:10.1098/rspb.2009.2184 1005:10.1098/rspb.2008.0094 869:(1): 147470491769040. 717:10.1098/rstb.2016.0350 434:10.1006/anbe.2000.1523 247:parasite-stress theory 1748:10.1093/beheco/arg043 1575:Hormones and Behavior 1192:10.1093/beheco/ars173 857:Antfolk, Jan (2017). 313:(MHC) or, in humans, 1982:Evolutionary biology 1362:10.1093/icb/30.2.325 674:Buss, David (2016). 636:Buss, David (2016). 540:Buss, David (2016). 187:Males may look for: 1780:2007PLoSO...2..640C 1477:(1387): 1471–1479. 1218:(1431): 1913–1917. 1136:(1692): 2405–2410. 999:(1640): 1279–1285. 950:1982Sci...218..384H 332:attraction and odor 194:paternity certainty 110:sexy son hypothesis 71:period, as well as 65:parental investment 57:Bateman's principle 1735:Behavioral Ecology 1349:American Zoologist 1179:Behavioral Ecology 711:(1724): 20160350. 373:Mating preferences 339:Facial preferences 225:Waist-to-hip ratio 181:biological signals 50:Female mate choice 1694:(10): 2473–2486. 1526:(1585): 471–478. 1050:978-0-333-71457-7 944:(4570): 384–387. 685:978-0-205-99212-6 647:978-0-205-99212-6 551:978-0-205-99212-6 406:978-0-333-72558-0 92:Female short-term 87:Mating strategies 1989: 1961: 1960: 1950: 1940: 1916: 1910: 1909: 1903: 1898: 1896: 1888: 1886: 1876: 1867: 1861: 1860: 1854: 1849: 1847: 1839: 1837: 1827: 1818: 1812: 1811: 1801: 1791: 1759: 1753: 1752: 1750: 1726: 1720: 1719: 1683: 1677: 1676: 1656: 1650: 1649: 1613: 1607: 1606: 1570: 1564: 1560: 1554: 1553: 1543: 1511: 1505: 1504: 1494: 1462: 1456: 1455: 1445: 1413: 1404: 1403: 1393: 1373: 1367: 1366: 1364: 1340: 1334: 1333: 1305: 1299: 1298: 1280: 1252: 1246: 1245: 1235: 1203: 1197: 1196: 1194: 1170: 1164: 1163: 1153: 1121: 1115: 1114: 1112: 1088: 1082: 1081: 1061: 1055: 1054: 1036: 1027: 1026: 1016: 984: 978: 977: 933: 927: 926: 905: 899: 898: 888: 878: 854: 848: 847: 811: 802: 801: 749: 743: 742: 728: 696: 690: 689: 671: 652: 651: 633: 618: 617: 607: 589: 565: 556: 555: 537: 516: 515: 513: 487: 481: 480: 460: 454: 453: 422:Animal Behaviour 417: 411: 410: 392: 346:facial asymmetry 325:Odor preferences 259:indicator traits 125:Female long-term 1997: 1996: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1931:(9): e1000184. 1918: 1917: 1913: 1899: 1889: 1874: 1869: 1868: 1864: 1850: 1840: 1825: 1820: 1819: 1815: 1761: 1760: 1756: 1728: 1727: 1723: 1685: 1684: 1680: 1658: 1657: 1653: 1615: 1614: 1610: 1572: 1571: 1567: 1561: 1557: 1513: 1512: 1508: 1464: 1463: 1459: 1422:Biology Letters 1415: 1414: 1407: 1391:10.1.1.496.1320 1375: 1374: 1370: 1342: 1341: 1337: 1307: 1306: 1302: 1254: 1253: 1249: 1205: 1204: 1200: 1172: 1171: 1167: 1123: 1122: 1118: 1090: 1089: 1085: 1063: 1062: 1058: 1051: 1038: 1037: 1030: 986: 985: 981: 935: 934: 930: 907: 906: 902: 856: 855: 851: 813: 812: 805: 751: 750: 746: 698: 697: 693: 686: 673: 672: 655: 648: 635: 634: 621: 567: 566: 559: 552: 539: 538: 519: 489: 488: 484: 462: 461: 457: 419: 418: 414: 407: 394: 393: 386: 381: 364: 355: 341: 327: 308: 299: 243: 205:Facial symmetry 177: 148: 146:Male short-term 140:parasite stress 127: 94: 89: 52: 40:parasite stress 30:, an aspect of 23: 12: 11: 5: 1995: 1993: 1985: 1984: 1979: 1969: 1968: 1963: 1962: 1911: 1902:|journal= 1884:10.1101/339028 1862: 1853:|journal= 1835:10.1101/322255 1813: 1754: 1741:(5): 668–678. 1721: 1678: 1667:(3): 213–226. 1651: 1624:(4): 497–512. 1608: 1581:(4): 384–388. 1565: 1555: 1506: 1457: 1428:(4): 400–403. 1405: 1368: 1355:(2): 325–339. 1335: 1316:(4): 871–887. 1300: 1247: 1198: 1185:(2): 373–379. 1165: 1116: 1103:(6): 403–416. 1083: 1072:(2): 155–172. 1056: 1049: 1028: 979: 928: 900: 849: 803: 744: 691: 684: 653: 646: 619: 557: 550: 517: 482: 471:(5): 395–424. 455: 428:(6): 773–780. 412: 405: 383: 382: 380: 377: 376: 375: 370: 363: 360: 354: 351: 340: 337: 326: 323: 319:heterozygosity 307: 304: 298: 295: 294: 293: 287: 276: 242: 239: 238: 237: 234: 228: 222: 218: 208: 202: 176: 175:Male long-term 173: 172: 171: 167: 163: 159: 147: 144: 126: 123: 122: 121: 117: 113: 105: 93: 90: 88: 85: 51: 48: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1994: 1983: 1980: 1978: 1975: 1974: 1972: 1958: 1954: 1949: 1944: 1939: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1925:PLOS Genetics 1922: 1915: 1912: 1907: 1894: 1885: 1880: 1873: 1866: 1863: 1858: 1845: 1836: 1831: 1824: 1817: 1814: 1809: 1805: 1800: 1795: 1790: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1758: 1755: 1749: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1725: 1722: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1682: 1679: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1655: 1652: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1612: 1609: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1569: 1566: 1559: 1556: 1551: 1547: 1542: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1510: 1507: 1502: 1498: 1493: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1461: 1458: 1453: 1449: 1444: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1412: 1410: 1406: 1401: 1397: 1392: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1372: 1369: 1363: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1339: 1336: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1304: 1301: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1279: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1251: 1248: 1243: 1239: 1234: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1202: 1199: 1193: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1169: 1166: 1161: 1157: 1152: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1120: 1117: 1111: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1087: 1084: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1060: 1057: 1052: 1046: 1042: 1035: 1033: 1029: 1024: 1020: 1015: 1010: 1006: 1002: 998: 994: 990: 983: 980: 975: 971: 967: 963: 959: 955: 951: 947: 943: 939: 932: 929: 924: 920: 916: 912: 904: 901: 896: 892: 887: 882: 877: 872: 868: 864: 860: 853: 850: 845: 841: 837: 833: 829: 825: 821: 817: 810: 808: 804: 800: 795: 791: 787: 783: 779: 775: 771: 770:10.1068/p6331 767: 763: 759: 755: 748: 745: 741: 736: 732: 727: 722: 718: 714: 710: 706: 702: 695: 692: 687: 681: 677: 670: 668: 666: 664: 662: 660: 658: 654: 649: 643: 639: 632: 630: 628: 626: 624: 620: 615: 611: 606: 601: 597: 593: 588: 583: 579: 575: 571: 564: 562: 558: 553: 547: 543: 536: 534: 532: 530: 528: 526: 524: 522: 518: 512: 507: 503: 499: 498: 493: 486: 483: 478: 474: 470: 466: 459: 456: 451: 447: 443: 439: 435: 431: 427: 423: 416: 413: 408: 402: 398: 391: 389: 385: 378: 374: 371: 369: 366: 365: 361: 359: 352: 350: 347: 338: 336: 333: 324: 322: 320: 316: 312: 305: 303: 296: 291: 288: 284: 280: 277: 274: 273:Scarification 271: 270: 269: 267: 262: 260: 256: 252: 248: 240: 235: 232: 229: 226: 223: 219: 216: 212: 209: 206: 203: 199: 195: 190: 189: 188: 185: 182: 174: 168: 164: 160: 157: 156: 155: 152: 145: 143: 141: 137: 131: 124: 118: 114: 111: 106: 102: 101: 100: 98: 91: 86: 84: 80: 76: 74: 70: 66: 62: 58: 49: 47: 43: 41: 37: 33: 29: 21: 16: 1928: 1924: 1914: 1893:cite journal 1865: 1844:cite journal 1816: 1771: 1767: 1757: 1738: 1734: 1724: 1691: 1687: 1681: 1664: 1660: 1654: 1621: 1617: 1611: 1578: 1574: 1568: 1558: 1523: 1519: 1509: 1474: 1470: 1460: 1425: 1421: 1384:(2): 89–96. 1381: 1377: 1371: 1352: 1348: 1338: 1313: 1309: 1303: 1263:(2): 86–87. 1260: 1256: 1250: 1215: 1211: 1201: 1182: 1178: 1168: 1133: 1129: 1119: 1100: 1096: 1086: 1069: 1065: 1059: 1040: 996: 992: 982: 941: 937: 931: 914: 910: 903: 866: 862: 852: 819: 815: 797: 761: 757: 747: 738: 708: 704: 694: 675: 637: 577: 573: 541: 501: 495: 485: 468: 464: 458: 425: 421: 415: 396: 356: 342: 328: 309: 300: 263: 244: 186: 178: 153: 149: 136:mate copying 132: 128: 95: 81: 77: 53: 44: 24: 15: 1774:(7): e640. 283:masculinity 279:Masculinity 69:gestational 28:mate choice 20:Mate choice 1971:Categories 1278:1893/17923 758:Perception 580:: 573123. 379:References 353:Criticisms 297:Criticisms 211:Femininity 170:courtship. 120:long-term. 97:David Buss 1688:Evolution 1563:20171830. 1386:CiteSeerX 917:: 73–79. 836:0004-0002 778:0301-0066 596:1664-1078 286:research. 266:pathogens 251:parasites 73:lactation 1957:18787687 1808:17653267 1768:PLOS ONE 1716:20020857 1708:18691260 1646:40332494 1638:19054623 1595:15777804 1550:16615215 1452:17148217 1287:22289354 1242:10535106 1160:20236978 1023:18302996 895:28127998 886:10367477 844:20169468 786:19817153 735:28533465 614:33912094 450:15165482 442:11124875 362:See also 290:Polygamy 255:diseases 215:estrogen 1948:2519788 1799:1919430 1776:Bibcode 1603:8568275 1541:1560206 1501:9364787 1492:1688704 1443:1626373 1330:5158340 1295:7420555 1233:1690211 1151:2894896 1014:2602680 974:7123238 966:1688879 946:Bibcode 938:Science 726:5444069 605:8074860 231:Breasts 1977:Dating 1955:  1945:  1806:  1796:  1714:  1706:  1644:  1636:  1601:  1593:  1548:  1538:  1499:  1489:  1450:  1440:  1388:  1328:  1293:  1285:  1240:  1230:  1158:  1148:  1047:  1021:  1011:  972:  964:  893:  883:  842:  834:  794:136762 792:  784:  776:  733:  723:  682:  644:  612:  602:  594:  548:  448:  440:  403:  38:, and 1875:(PDF) 1826:(PDF) 1712:S2CID 1642:S2CID 1599:S2CID 1326:S2CID 1291:S2CID 962:JSTOR 790:S2CID 504:(1). 446:S2CID 36:genes 1953:PMID 1906:help 1857:help 1804:PMID 1704:PMID 1634:PMID 1591:PMID 1546:PMID 1497:PMID 1448:PMID 1283:PMID 1238:PMID 1156:PMID 1045:ISBN 1019:PMID 970:PMID 891:PMID 840:PMID 832:ISSN 782:PMID 774:ISSN 731:PMID 680:ISBN 642:ISBN 610:PMID 592:ISSN 546:ISBN 438:PMID 401:ISBN 245:The 201:her. 138:and 1943:PMC 1933:doi 1879:doi 1830:doi 1794:PMC 1784:doi 1743:doi 1696:doi 1669:doi 1626:doi 1583:doi 1536:PMC 1528:doi 1524:273 1487:PMC 1479:doi 1475:264 1438:PMC 1430:doi 1396:doi 1357:doi 1318:doi 1273:hdl 1265:doi 1228:PMC 1220:doi 1216:266 1187:doi 1146:PMC 1138:doi 1134:277 1105:doi 1074:doi 1009:PMC 1001:doi 997:275 954:doi 942:218 919:doi 881:PMC 871:doi 824:doi 766:doi 721:PMC 713:doi 709:372 600:PMC 582:doi 506:doi 473:doi 430:doi 253:or 198:DNA 59:of 1973:: 1951:. 1941:. 1927:. 1923:. 1897:: 1895:}} 1891:{{ 1877:. 1848:: 1846:}} 1842:{{ 1828:. 1802:. 1792:. 1782:. 1770:. 1766:. 1739:14 1737:. 1733:. 1710:. 1702:. 1692:62 1690:. 1665:26 1663:. 1640:. 1632:. 1622:34 1620:. 1597:. 1589:. 1579:47 1577:. 1544:. 1534:. 1522:. 1518:. 1495:. 1485:. 1473:. 1469:. 1446:. 1436:. 1424:. 1420:. 1408:^ 1394:. 1382:14 1380:. 1353:30 1351:. 1347:. 1324:. 1314:90 1312:. 1289:. 1281:. 1271:. 1261:35 1259:. 1236:. 1226:. 1214:. 1210:. 1183:24 1181:. 1177:. 1154:. 1144:. 1132:. 1128:. 1101:18 1099:. 1095:. 1070:16 1068:. 1031:^ 1017:. 1007:. 995:. 991:. 968:. 960:. 952:. 940:. 915:36 913:. 889:. 879:. 867:15 865:. 861:. 838:. 830:. 820:40 818:. 806:^ 796:. 788:. 780:. 772:. 762:38 760:. 756:. 737:. 729:. 719:. 707:. 703:. 656:^ 622:^ 608:. 598:. 590:. 578:12 576:. 572:. 560:^ 520:^ 500:. 494:. 469:16 467:. 444:. 436:. 426:60 424:. 387:^ 42:. 1959:. 1935:: 1929:4 1908:) 1904:( 1887:. 1881:: 1859:) 1855:( 1838:. 1832:: 1810:. 1786:: 1778:: 1772:2 1751:. 1745:: 1718:. 1698:: 1675:. 1671:: 1648:. 1628:: 1605:. 1585:: 1552:. 1530:: 1503:. 1481:: 1454:. 1432:: 1426:1 1402:. 1398:: 1365:. 1359:: 1332:. 1320:: 1297:. 1275:: 1267:: 1244:. 1222:: 1195:. 1189:: 1162:. 1140:: 1113:. 1107:: 1080:. 1076:: 1053:. 1025:. 1003:: 976:. 956:: 948:: 925:. 921:: 897:. 873:: 846:. 826:: 768:: 715:: 688:. 650:. 616:. 584:: 554:. 514:. 508:: 502:6 479:. 475:: 452:. 432:: 409:. 22:.

Index

Mate choice
mate choice
sexual selection in humans
genes
parasite stress
Bateman's principle
Lifespan Reproductive Success (LRS)
parental investment
gestational
lactation
David Buss
sexy son hypothesis
mate copying
parasite stress
biological signals
paternity certainty
DNA
Facial symmetry
Femininity
estrogen
Waist-to-hip ratio
Breasts
parasite-stress theory
parasites
diseases
indicator traits
pathogens
Scarification
Masculinity
masculinity

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑