489:
31:
146:
Oklahoma's statutory characterization of aggravating circumstances as "especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel" is unconstitutionally vague under the Eighth
Amendment; the proper analysis focuses on whether the challenged aggravating circumstance adequately informs the jury as to what it must find in
559:
554:
339:
415:
387:
362:
324:
129:
72:
334:
311:
278:
252:
297:, that he would adhere to his view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
574:
549:
329:
569:
564:
530:
147:
order to impose the death penalty, or whether it leaves the jury with unchanneled discretion to make an arbitrary and capricious decision.
496:
266:
35:
523:
488:
290:
121:
107:
462:
202:
170:
419:
391:
366:
133:
64:
516:
426:
444:
306:
317:
294:
283:
194:
182:
162:
500:
435:
382:
214:
453:
394:
369:
206:
190:
543:
274:
67:
178:
125:
83:
111:
79:
471:
116:
340:
List of United States
Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist Court
104:
281:
was too vague. As such, Oklahoma's law was overturned based on
30:
560:
Cruel and
Unusual Punishment Clause and death penalty case law
555:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
504:
325:
List of United States
Supreme Court cases, volume 486
335:
Lists of United States
Supreme Court cases by volume
246:
238:
227:
222:
151:
140:
96:
91:
59:
49:
42:
23:
312:Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution
269:case in which a unanimous Court found that the
524:
8:
531:
517:
20:
330:List of United States Supreme Court cases
271:"especially heinous, atrocious or cruel"
351:
293:announced in a concurrence, joined by
18:1988 United States Supreme Court case
7:
485:
483:
273:standard for the application of the
503:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
497:Supreme Court of the United States
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
575:United States Supreme Court stubs
550:United States Supreme Court cases
422:356 (1988) is available from:
487:
29:
570:Capital punishment in Oklahoma
565:1988 in United States case law
1:
495:This article related to the
265:, 486 U.S. 356 (1988), is a
267:United States Supreme Court
242:Brennan, joined by Marshall
591:
482:
472:Oyez (oral argument audio)
251:
156:
145:
28:
253:U.S. Const. amend. VIII
171:William J. Brennan Jr.
412:Maynard v. Cartwright
359:Maynard v. Cartwright
262:Maynard v. Cartwright
101:Cartwright v. Maynard
78:108 S. Ct. 1853; 100
54:Maynard v. Cartwright
43:Argued April 19, 1988
114:1986); on rehearing
45:Decided June 6, 1988
463:Library of Congress
203:Sandra Day O'Connor
397:, 227, 231 (1976).
307:Capital punishment
277:as defined by the
167:Associate Justices
124:(10th Cir. 1987);
512:
511:
318:Walton v. Arizona
284:Furman v. Georgia
258:
257:
231:White, joined by
183:Thurgood Marshall
163:William Rehnquist
24:Maynard v. Howell
582:
533:
526:
519:
491:
484:
476:
470:
467:
461:
458:
452:
449:
443:
440:
434:
431:
425:
398:
383:Gregg v. Georgia
379:
373:
356:
295:Justice Marshall
279:Eighth Amendment
152:Court membership
136:1003 (1988).
33:
32:
21:
590:
589:
585:
584:
583:
581:
580:
579:
540:
539:
538:
537:
480:
474:
468:
465:
459:
456:
450:
447:
441:
438:
432:
429:
423:
407:
402:
401:
380:
376:
357:
353:
348:
303:
291:Justice Brennan
215:Anthony Kennedy
205:
195:John P. Stevens
193:
181:
87:
44:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
588:
586:
578:
577:
572:
567:
562:
557:
552:
542:
541:
536:
535:
528:
521:
513:
510:
509:
492:
478:
477:
445:Google Scholar
406:
405:External links
403:
400:
399:
374:
350:
349:
347:
344:
343:
342:
337:
332:
327:
322:
314:
309:
302:
299:
256:
255:
249:
248:
244:
243:
240:
236:
235:
229:
225:
224:
220:
219:
218:
217:
207:Antonin Scalia
191:Harry Blackmun
168:
165:
160:
154:
153:
149:
148:
143:
142:
138:
137:
98:
94:
93:
89:
88:
77:
61:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
587:
576:
573:
571:
568:
566:
563:
561:
558:
556:
553:
551:
548:
547:
545:
534:
529:
527:
522:
520:
515:
514:
508:
506:
502:
498:
493:
490:
486:
481:
473:
464:
455:
446:
437:
428:
427:CourtListener
421:
417:
413:
409:
408:
404:
396:
393:
389:
385:
384:
378:
375:
371:
368:
364:
360:
355:
352:
345:
341:
338:
336:
333:
331:
328:
326:
323:
320:
319:
315:
313:
310:
308:
305:
304:
300:
298:
296:
292:
288:
286:
285:
280:
276:
275:death penalty
272:
268:
264:
263:
254:
250:
245:
241:
237:
234:
230:
226:
223:Case opinions
221:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
164:
161:
159:Chief Justice
158:
157:
155:
150:
144:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
118:
113:
109:
106:
102:
99:
95:
90:
85:
81:
75:
74:
69:
66:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
505:expanding it
494:
479:
411:
381:
377:
372: (1988).
358:
354:
316:
289:
282:
270:
261:
260:
259:
247:Laws applied
232:
210:
198:
186:
174:
115:
100:
92:Case history
71:
53:
15:
239:Concurrence
179:Byron White
128:. granted,
120:, 822 F.2d
544:Categories
346:References
84:U.S. LEXIS
82:372; 1988
233:unanimous
112:10th Cir.
80:L. Ed. 2d
60:Citations
410:Text of
301:See also
287:(1972).
228:Majority
436:Findlaw
141:Holding
117:en banc
475:
469:
466:
460:
457:
454:Justia
451:
448:
442:
439:
433:
430:
424:
386:,
361:,
321:(1990)
213:
211:·
209:
201:
199:·
197:
189:
187:·
185:
177:
175:·
173:
103:, 802
499:is a
418:
390:
365:
132:
97:Prior
501:stub
420:U.S.
392:U.S.
367:U.S.
134:U.S.
126:cert
122:1477
108:1203
105:F.2d
86:2486
73:more
65:U.S.
63:486
416:486
395:153
388:428
370:356
363:486
130:484
68:356
546::
414:,
532:e
525:t
518:v
507:.
110:(
76:)
70:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.