31:
340:. Self-representation includes certain specific rights for a defendant to have his opinion heard. "The pro se defendant must be allowed to control the organization and content of his own defense, to make motions, to argue points of law, to participate in voir dire, to question witnesses, and to address the court and the jury at appropriate points in the trial. The record reveals that Wiggins was in fact accorded all of these rights."
406:
289:
to assist him if requested. Wiggins decided to defend himself and asked that the standby counsel be barred from interfering. Multiple times, both before and during the trial, Wiggins changed his mind regarding the standby counsel's role. Wiggins sometimes allowed or even requested standby counsels'
332:
In a split 6–3 decision, the court found that
Wiggins' right to present his own defense was not violated, since "it appears that he was allowed to make his own appearances as he saw fit and that his standby counsel's unsolicited involvement was held within reasonable limits." Judge Sandra Day
333:
O'Connor delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief
Justice Burger, Powell, Rehnquist, and Stevens joined. Blackmun concurred in the result without writing a separate opinion. White filed a dissenting opinion, in which Brennan and Marshall joined.
290:
participation. He was once again convicted. After his conviction, Wiggins moved for a new trial on the grounds that his standby counsel had interfered with his presentation of his own defense. This motion was denied by the trial court.
412:
1959:
1954:
316:(1975). The federal court agreed that counsel should not interfere without permission but found that Wiggins' attorneys had not interfered and the appeal was dismissed. Upon appeal the
530:
393:
361:
72:
625:
256:
228:
1876:
111:
285:. The conviction was overturned on the technicality, that the indictment was defective and Wiggins requested counsel for the second trial. The trial court appointed
1949:
1910:
616:
1964:
1717:
1009:
1490:
921:
771:
35:
1676:
461:
1969:
1637:
1538:
1351:
1188:
1153:
929:
456:
1519:
609:
336:
The decision was based on federal and state laws preserving a defendant's right to self-representation as guaranteed in
303:
1375:
1068:
242:
945:
854:
1581:
894:
886:
348:
This case set a precedent for the boundaries on the behavior of standby counsel by refining the position taken in
1470:
1263:
1041:
878:
790:
651:
429:
1856:
1685:
1664:
1367:
1271:
1033:
1017:
993:
798:
667:
1725:
1445:
1287:
1172:
1145:
1137:
977:
822:
602:
577:
1629:
1399:
1319:
985:
937:
755:
185:
141:
1886:
1741:
1701:
1605:
961:
830:
534:
397:
312:
64:
838:
1765:
1709:
1597:
1589:
1391:
1244:
969:
675:
1797:
1613:
1482:
1343:
1335:
1327:
1076:
814:
763:
639:
559:
541:
165:
1918:
1864:
1789:
1757:
1645:
1498:
1359:
1223:
1108:
1100:
870:
862:
717:
478:
246:
1781:
1773:
1621:
1565:
1557:
1426:
1303:
1180:
1116:
1092:
1084:
913:
507:
282:
177:
173:
153:
1902:
1821:
1749:
1693:
1407:
1279:
1025:
550:
470:
321:
133:
1311:
1295:
1128:
953:
659:
317:
286:
115:
594:
1837:
1813:
1805:
1573:
1060:
846:
568:
400:
307:
161:
1943:
1829:
1383:
1001:
806:
299:
1733:
709:
696:
67:
54:
McKaskle, Acting
Director, Texas Department of Corrections v. Carl Edwin Wiggins
260:
149:
320:
reversed, holding that
Wiggins' Sixth Amendment right to represent himself was
83:
511:
79:
586:
324:
by the intrusive participation of the court-appointed standby counsel.
482:
272:
457:"The Criminal Defendant's Sixth Amendment Right to Lay Representation"
245:
case in which the court considered the role of standby counsel in a
100:
Certiorari to the United States Court of
Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
277:
251:
474:
263:
was violated by the presence of a court-appointed standby counsel.
490:
Scott, T. A. (1984). "The Role of
Standby Counsel: The Road from
202:
O'Connor, joined by Burger, Powell, Rehnquist, Blackmun, Stevens
1517:
1468:
1242:
1211:
736:
694:
637:
598:
30:
306:, claiming that standby counsel's conduct deprived him of his
298:
When
Wiggins had exhausted both direct appellate and state
1960:
United States Sixth
Amendment self-representation case law
413:
public domain material from this U.S government document
114:
was not violated by the presence of a court-appointed
1955:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court
362:
List of United States
Supreme Court cases, volume 465
469:(2). The University of Chicago Law Review: 460–480.
1875:
1848:
1675:
1656:
1549:
1530:
1437:
1418:
1255:
1164:
1127:
1052:
905:
782:
747:
310:right to conduct his own defense as guaranteed in
222:
214:
206:
198:
193:
122:
104:
96:
91:
59:
49:
42:
23:
430:"Defending Oneself in Court - The Crime library"
249:where the defendant conducted his own defense (
610:
8:
259:right to present his own case in a criminal
255:). In this case the defendant claimed his
1527:
1514:
1465:
1252:
1239:
1208:
744:
733:
691:
634:
617:
603:
595:
424:
422:
20:
1911:Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California
385:
383:
381:
379:
377:
373:
110:Respondent's Sixth Amendment right to
18:1984 United States Supreme Court case
7:
271:Carl Edwin Wiggins was on trial for
1010:Southern Union Co. v. United States
281:and was convicted and sentenced to
1491:United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal
922:Almendarez-Torres v. United States
772:Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas
352:regarding standby counsels' role.
218:White, joined by Brennan, Marshall
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
1950:United States Supreme Court cases
1438:Restrictions on cross-examination
537:168 (1984) is available from:
462:University of Chicago Law Review
404:
302:, he filed a habeas petition in
29:
1539:United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez
1965:1984 in United States case law
1352:Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts
855:Rosales-Lopez v. United States
1:
626:United States Sixth Amendment
1520:Assistance of Counsel Clause
241:, 465 U.S. 168 (1984), is a
1069:Rassmussen v. United States
243:United States Supreme Court
1986:
1419:Face-to-face confrontation
1189:Peña-Rodriguez v. Colorado
887:McDonnell v. United States
587:Oyez (oral argument audio)
411:This article incorporates
1526:
1513:
1477:
1471:Compulsory Process Clause
1464:
1264:Reynolds v. United States
1251:
1238:
1218:
1207:
1042:Erlinger v. United States
895:United States v. Tsarnaev
879:Skilling v. United States
791:Reynolds v. United States
743:
732:
704:
690:
652:Klopfer v. North Carolina
646:
633:
227:
127:
109:
28:
1857:Massiah v. United States
1686:Strickland v. Washington
1665:Glasser v. United States
1638:Nichols v. United States
1368:Bullcoming v. New Mexico
1272:Dowdell v. United States
1034:United States v. Haymond
1018:Alleyne v. United States
994:Cunningham v. California
799:Glasser v. United States
668:Doggett v. United States
455:Block, Mindy D. (1985).
45:Decided January 24, 1984
1726:Glover v. United States
1446:Chambers v. Mississippi
1288:Bruton v. United States
1256:Out-of-court statements
1173:Tanner v. United States
1165:Impeachment of verdicts
1146:Burton v. United States
1138:United States v. Dawson
978:United States v. Booker
946:Harris v. United States
823:Witherspoon v. Illinois
43:Argued November 9, 1983
1970:Legal history of Texas
1849:Uncounseled statements
1677:Ineffective assistance
1630:Pennsylvania v. Finley
1400:Samia v. United States
1320:Crawford v. Washington
1154:Smith v. United States
986:Washington v. Recuenco
938:Apprendi v. New Jersey
930:Jones v. United States
756:Cheff v. Schnackenberg
432:. www.crimelibrary.com
304:Federal District Court
142:William J. Brennan Jr.
1887:Faretta v. California
1742:Woodford v. Visciotti
1702:Kimmelman v. Morrison
1606:Argersinger v. Hamlin
962:Blakely v. Washington
831:Ham v. South Carolina
738:Impartial Jury Clause
350:Faretta v. California
313:Faretta v. California
275:and chose to proceed
229:U.S. Const. amend. VI
1766:Wright v. Van Patten
1710:Lockhart v. Fretwell
1598:Anders v. California
1590:Gideon v. Wainwright
1392:Hemphill v. New York
1376:Williams v. Illinois
1245:Confrontation Clause
970:Schriro v. Summerlin
676:Betterman v. Montana
210:Blackmun (in result)
1895:McKaskle v. Wiggins
1798:Padilla v. Kentucky
1614:Gagnon v. Scarpelli
1582:Hamilton v. Alabama
1483:Washington v. Texas
1344:Giles v. California
1336:Whorton v. Bockting
1328:Davis v. Washington
1077:Williams v. Florida
815:Sheppard v. Maxwell
764:Duncan v. Louisiana
640:Speedy Trial Clause
578:Library of Congress
527:McKaskle v. Wiggins
390:McKaskle v. Wiggins
238:McKaskle v. Wiggins
186:Sandra Day O'Connor
166:Lewis F. Powell Jr.
112:self-representation
24:McKaskle v. Wiggins
1919:Indiana v. Edwards
1865:Brewer v. Williams
1790:Porter v. McCollum
1758:Holland v. Jackson
1718:Williams v. Taylor
1646:Alabama v. Shelton
1499:Taylor v. Illinois
1360:Michigan v. Bryant
1224:Rabe v. Washington
1213:Information Clause
1109:Ramos v. Louisiana
1101:Burch v. Louisiana
1053:Size and unanimity
871:Morgan v. Illinois
863:Wainwright v. Witt
718:Presley v. Georgia
500:Howard Law Journal
138:Associate Justices
78:104 S.Ct. 944; 79
1937:
1936:
1933:
1932:
1929:
1928:
1782:Wong v. Belmontes
1774:Bobby v. Van Hook
1622:Scott v. Illinois
1566:Johnson v. Zerbst
1558:Powell v. Alabama
1509:
1508:
1460:
1459:
1456:
1455:
1427:Maryland v. Craig
1304:Illinois v. Allen
1234:
1233:
1203:
1202:
1199:
1198:
1181:Warger v. Shauers
1117:Edwards v. Vannoy
1093:Ballew v. Georgia
1085:Apodaca v. Oregon
914:Walton v. Arizona
728:
727:
686:
685:
283:life imprisonment
234:
233:
174:William Rehnquist
154:Thurgood Marshall
1977:
1903:Rock v. Arkansas
1822:Lafler v. Cooper
1750:Wiggins v. Smith
1694:Nix v. Whiteside
1528:
1515:
1466:
1408:Smith v. Arizona
1280:Pointer v. Texas
1253:
1240:
1209:
1026:Hurst v. Florida
839:Ristaino v. Ross
745:
734:
692:
635:
619:
612:
605:
596:
591:
585:
582:
576:
573:
567:
564:
558:
555:
549:
546:
540:
515:
486:
442:
441:
439:
437:
426:
417:
408:
407:
387:
318:Court of Appeals
134:Warren E. Burger
123:Court membership
33:
32:
21:
1985:
1984:
1980:
1979:
1978:
1976:
1975:
1974:
1940:
1939:
1938:
1925:
1871:
1844:
1671:
1652:
1545:
1522:
1505:
1473:
1452:
1433:
1414:
1312:Ohio v. Roberts
1296:Frazier v. Cupp
1247:
1230:
1214:
1195:
1160:
1129:Vicinage Clause
1123:
1048:
954:Ring v. Arizona
901:
778:
739:
724:
700:
682:
660:Barker v. Wingo
642:
629:
623:
589:
583:
580:
574:
571:
565:
562:
556:
553:
547:
544:
538:
522:
489:
475:10.2307/1599665
454:
451:
449:Further reading
446:
445:
435:
433:
428:
427:
420:
405:
388:
375:
370:
358:
346:
330:
296:
287:standby counsel
269:
257:Sixth Amendment
178:John P. Stevens
176:
164:
152:
116:standby counsel
87:
44:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1983:
1981:
1973:
1972:
1967:
1962:
1957:
1952:
1942:
1941:
1935:
1934:
1931:
1930:
1927:
1926:
1924:
1923:
1915:
1907:
1899:
1891:
1882:
1880:
1879:representation
1873:
1872:
1870:
1869:
1861:
1852:
1850:
1846:
1845:
1843:
1842:
1838:Garza v. Idaho
1834:
1826:
1818:
1814:Premo v. Moore
1810:
1806:Sears v. Upton
1802:
1794:
1786:
1778:
1770:
1762:
1754:
1746:
1738:
1730:
1722:
1714:
1706:
1698:
1690:
1681:
1679:
1673:
1672:
1670:
1669:
1660:
1658:
1654:
1653:
1651:
1650:
1642:
1634:
1626:
1618:
1610:
1602:
1594:
1586:
1578:
1574:Betts v. Brady
1570:
1562:
1553:
1551:
1547:
1546:
1544:
1543:
1534:
1532:
1524:
1523:
1518:
1511:
1510:
1507:
1506:
1504:
1503:
1495:
1487:
1478:
1475:
1474:
1469:
1462:
1461:
1458:
1457:
1454:
1453:
1451:
1450:
1441:
1439:
1435:
1434:
1432:
1431:
1422:
1420:
1416:
1415:
1413:
1412:
1404:
1396:
1388:
1380:
1372:
1364:
1356:
1348:
1340:
1332:
1324:
1316:
1308:
1300:
1292:
1284:
1276:
1268:
1259:
1257:
1249:
1248:
1243:
1236:
1235:
1232:
1231:
1229:
1228:
1219:
1216:
1215:
1212:
1205:
1204:
1201:
1200:
1197:
1196:
1194:
1193:
1185:
1177:
1168:
1166:
1162:
1161:
1159:
1158:
1150:
1142:
1133:
1131:
1125:
1124:
1122:
1121:
1113:
1105:
1097:
1089:
1081:
1073:
1065:
1061:Maxwell v. Dow
1056:
1054:
1050:
1049:
1047:
1046:
1038:
1030:
1022:
1014:
1006:
998:
990:
982:
974:
966:
958:
950:
942:
934:
926:
918:
909:
907:
903:
902:
900:
899:
891:
883:
875:
867:
859:
851:
847:Adams v. Texas
843:
835:
827:
819:
811:
803:
795:
786:
784:
780:
779:
777:
776:
768:
760:
751:
749:
741:
740:
737:
730:
729:
726:
725:
723:
722:
714:
705:
702:
701:
695:
688:
687:
684:
683:
681:
680:
672:
664:
656:
647:
644:
643:
638:
631:
630:
624:
622:
621:
614:
607:
599:
593:
592:
560:Google Scholar
521:
520:External links
518:
517:
516:
487:
450:
447:
444:
443:
418:
372:
371:
369:
366:
365:
364:
357:
354:
345:
342:
329:
326:
308:constitutional
295:
292:
268:
265:
247:criminal trial
232:
231:
225:
224:
220:
219:
216:
212:
211:
208:
204:
203:
200:
196:
195:
191:
190:
189:
188:
162:Harry Blackmun
139:
136:
131:
125:
124:
120:
119:
107:
106:
102:
101:
98:
94:
93:
89:
88:
77:
61:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1982:
1971:
1968:
1966:
1963:
1961:
1958:
1956:
1953:
1951:
1948:
1947:
1945:
1921:
1920:
1916:
1913:
1912:
1908:
1905:
1904:
1900:
1897:
1896:
1892:
1889:
1888:
1884:
1883:
1881:
1878:
1874:
1867:
1866:
1862:
1859:
1858:
1854:
1853:
1851:
1847:
1840:
1839:
1835:
1832:
1831:
1830:Buck v. Davis
1827:
1824:
1823:
1819:
1816:
1815:
1811:
1808:
1807:
1803:
1800:
1799:
1795:
1792:
1791:
1787:
1784:
1783:
1779:
1776:
1775:
1771:
1768:
1767:
1763:
1760:
1759:
1755:
1752:
1751:
1747:
1744:
1743:
1739:
1736:
1735:
1731:
1728:
1727:
1723:
1720:
1719:
1715:
1712:
1711:
1707:
1704:
1703:
1699:
1696:
1695:
1691:
1688:
1687:
1683:
1682:
1680:
1678:
1674:
1667:
1666:
1662:
1661:
1659:
1657:Conflict-free
1655:
1648:
1647:
1643:
1640:
1639:
1635:
1632:
1631:
1627:
1624:
1623:
1619:
1616:
1615:
1611:
1608:
1607:
1603:
1600:
1599:
1595:
1592:
1591:
1587:
1584:
1583:
1579:
1576:
1575:
1571:
1568:
1567:
1563:
1560:
1559:
1555:
1554:
1552:
1548:
1541:
1540:
1536:
1535:
1533:
1529:
1525:
1521:
1516:
1512:
1501:
1500:
1496:
1493:
1492:
1488:
1485:
1484:
1480:
1479:
1476:
1472:
1467:
1463:
1448:
1447:
1443:
1442:
1440:
1436:
1429:
1428:
1424:
1423:
1421:
1417:
1410:
1409:
1405:
1402:
1401:
1397:
1394:
1393:
1389:
1386:
1385:
1384:Ohio v. Clark
1381:
1378:
1377:
1373:
1370:
1369:
1365:
1362:
1361:
1357:
1354:
1353:
1349:
1346:
1345:
1341:
1338:
1337:
1333:
1330:
1329:
1325:
1322:
1321:
1317:
1314:
1313:
1309:
1306:
1305:
1301:
1298:
1297:
1293:
1290:
1289:
1285:
1282:
1281:
1277:
1274:
1273:
1269:
1266:
1265:
1261:
1260:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1241:
1237:
1226:
1225:
1221:
1220:
1217:
1210:
1206:
1191:
1190:
1186:
1183:
1182:
1178:
1175:
1174:
1170:
1169:
1167:
1163:
1156:
1155:
1151:
1148:
1147:
1143:
1140:
1139:
1135:
1134:
1132:
1130:
1126:
1119:
1118:
1114:
1111:
1110:
1106:
1103:
1102:
1098:
1095:
1094:
1090:
1087:
1086:
1082:
1079:
1078:
1074:
1071:
1070:
1066:
1063:
1062:
1058:
1057:
1055:
1051:
1044:
1043:
1039:
1036:
1035:
1031:
1028:
1027:
1023:
1020:
1019:
1015:
1012:
1011:
1007:
1004:
1003:
1002:Oregon v. Ice
999:
996:
995:
991:
988:
987:
983:
980:
979:
975:
972:
971:
967:
964:
963:
959:
956:
955:
951:
948:
947:
943:
940:
939:
935:
932:
931:
927:
924:
923:
919:
916:
915:
911:
910:
908:
904:
897:
896:
892:
889:
888:
884:
881:
880:
876:
873:
872:
868:
865:
864:
860:
857:
856:
852:
849:
848:
844:
841:
840:
836:
833:
832:
828:
825:
824:
820:
817:
816:
812:
809:
808:
807:Irvin v. Dowd
804:
801:
800:
796:
793:
792:
788:
787:
785:
781:
774:
773:
769:
766:
765:
761:
758:
757:
753:
752:
750:
746:
742:
735:
731:
720:
719:
715:
712:
711:
707:
706:
703:
698:
693:
689:
678:
677:
673:
670:
669:
665:
662:
661:
657:
654:
653:
649:
648:
645:
641:
636:
632:
627:
620:
615:
613:
608:
606:
601:
600:
597:
588:
579:
570:
561:
552:
543:
542:CourtListener
536:
532:
528:
524:
523:
519:
513:
509:
505:
501:
497:
493:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
463:
458:
453:
452:
448:
431:
425:
423:
419:
416:
414:
403: (1984).
402:
399:
395:
391:
386:
384:
382:
380:
378:
374:
367:
363:
360:
359:
355:
353:
351:
343:
341:
339:
334:
327:
325:
323:
319:
315:
314:
309:
305:
301:
300:habeas corpus
293:
291:
288:
284:
280:
279:
274:
267:Circumstances
266:
264:
262:
258:
254:
253:
248:
244:
240:
239:
230:
226:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
194:Case opinions
192:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
140:
137:
135:
132:
130:Chief Justice
129:
128:
126:
121:
117:
113:
108:
103:
99:
95:
90:
85:
81:
75:
74:
69:
66:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
1917:
1909:
1901:
1894:
1893:
1885:
1863:
1855:
1836:
1828:
1820:
1812:
1804:
1796:
1788:
1780:
1772:
1764:
1756:
1748:
1740:
1734:Bell v. Cone
1732:
1724:
1716:
1708:
1700:
1692:
1684:
1663:
1644:
1636:
1628:
1620:
1612:
1604:
1596:
1588:
1580:
1572:
1564:
1556:
1537:
1497:
1489:
1481:
1444:
1425:
1406:
1398:
1390:
1382:
1374:
1366:
1358:
1350:
1342:
1334:
1326:
1318:
1310:
1302:
1294:
1286:
1278:
1270:
1262:
1222:
1187:
1179:
1171:
1152:
1149:(1905, 1906)
1144:
1136:
1115:
1107:
1099:
1091:
1083:
1075:
1067:
1059:
1040:
1032:
1024:
1016:
1008:
1000:
992:
984:
976:
968:
960:
952:
944:
936:
928:
920:
912:
893:
885:
877:
869:
861:
853:
845:
837:
829:
821:
813:
805:
797:
789:
783:Impartiality
770:
762:
754:
748:Availability
716:
710:In re Oliver
708:
697:Public Trial
674:
666:
658:
650:
526:
503:
499:
495:
491:
466:
460:
434:. Retrieved
410:
389:
349:
347:
344:Significance
337:
335:
331:
311:
297:
276:
270:
250:
237:
236:
235:
223:Laws applied
181:
169:
157:
145:
92:Case history
71:
53:
15:
1550:Appointment
906:Facts found
207:Concurrence
150:Byron White
1944:Categories
368:References
84:U.S. LEXIS
82:122; 1984
512:0018-6813
436:March 28,
80:L. Ed. 2d
60:Citations
628:case law
525:Text of
506:: 1799.
356:See also
328:Decision
322:violated
199:Majority
551:Findlaw
496:Wiggins
492:Faretta
483:1599665
338:Faretta
294:Appeals
273:robbery
215:Dissent
105:Holding
1922:(2008)
1914:(2000)
1906:(1987)
1898:(1984)
1890:(1975)
1877:Pro se
1868:(1977)
1860:(1963)
1841:(2019)
1833:(2017)
1825:(2012)
1817:(2011)
1809:(2010)
1801:(2010)
1793:(2009)
1785:(2009)
1777:(2009)
1769:(2008)
1761:(2004)
1753:(2003)
1745:(2002)
1737:(2002)
1729:(2001)
1721:(2000)
1713:(1993)
1705:(1986)
1697:(1986)
1689:(1984)
1668:(1942)
1649:(2002)
1641:(1994)
1633:(1987)
1625:(1979)
1617:(1973)
1609:(1972)
1601:(1967)
1593:(1963)
1585:(1961)
1577:(1942)
1569:(1938)
1561:(1932)
1542:(2006)
1531:Choice
1502:(1988)
1494:(1982)
1486:(1967)
1449:(1973)
1430:(1990)
1411:(2024)
1403:(2023)
1395:(2022)
1387:(2015)
1379:(2012)
1371:(2011)
1363:(2011)
1355:(2009)
1347:(2008)
1339:(2007)
1331:(2006)
1323:(2004)
1315:(1980)
1307:(1970)
1299:(1969)
1291:(1968)
1283:(1965)
1275:(1911)
1267:(1878)
1227:(1972)
1192:(2017)
1184:(2014)
1176:(1987)
1157:(2023)
1141:(1853)
1120:(2021)
1112:(2020)
1104:(1979)
1096:(1978)
1088:(1972)
1080:(1970)
1072:(1905)
1064:(1900)
1045:(2024)
1037:(2019)
1029:(2016)
1021:(2013)
1013:(2012)
1005:(2009)
997:(2007)
989:(2006)
981:(2005)
973:(2004)
965:(2004)
957:(2002)
949:(2002)
941:(2000)
933:(1999)
925:(1998)
917:(1990)
898:(2022)
890:(2016)
882:(2010)
874:(1992)
866:(1985)
858:(1981)
850:(1980)
842:(1976)
834:(1973)
826:(1968)
818:(1966)
810:(1961)
802:(1942)
794:(1878)
775:(1989)
767:(1968)
759:(1966)
721:(2010)
713:(1948)
699:Clause
679:(2016)
671:(1992)
663:(1972)
655:(1967)
590:
584:
581:
575:
572:
569:Justia
566:
563:
557:
554:
548:
545:
539:
510:
481:
409:
392:,
278:pro se
252:pro se
184:
182:·
180:
172:
170:·
168:
160:
158:·
156:
148:
146:·
144:
533:
479:JSTOR
396:
261:trial
97:Prior
535:U.S.
508:ISSN
438:2008
398:U.S.
73:more
65:U.S.
63:465
531:465
498:".
494:to
471:doi
401:168
394:465
68:168
1946::
529:,
504:27
502:.
477:.
467:52
465:.
459:.
421:^
376:^
86:24
618:e
611:t
604:v
514:.
485:.
473::
440:.
415:.
118:.
76:)
70:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.