Knowledge

Coding interview

Source 📝

424: 202:
research paper entitled "Why Are Manhole Covers Round? A Laboratory Study of Reactions to Puzzle Interviews". Poundstone, who had written puzzle interview guides for Microsoft and Google, referred to puzzle questions in 2012 as "a sort of fad" that lost popularity because of a lack of evidence of their effectiveness.
201:
associate professor of psychology Chris Wright found that puzzle interview questions annoyed job applicants. "Methods that had a transparent relationship between test content and job duties, such as interviews, work samples, and reference checks were perceived more favorably," Wright wrote in a
139:
The questions asked during a coding interview are crafted to determine a candidate's problem solving, coding and design abilities. Eccentric questions (such as "Which of the fifty states would you remove?") test a candidate's ability to come to a decision and articulate it. Candidates answering
185:
are typically round (in some countries) when they began asking it as a job interview question. Originally meant as a psychological assessment of how one approaches a question with more than one correct answer, the problem has produced a number of alternative explanations, from the
130:
wrote, "Puzzles test competitive edge as well as intelligence. Like business or football, a logic puzzle divides the world into winners and losers. You either get the answer, or you don't. … Winning has to matter."
343: 147:
A coding interview is intended to seek out creative thinkers and those who can adapt their solutions to rapidly changing and dynamic scenarios.
319: 292: 461: 114:
Microsoft's interview style was distinctive in that it concerned technical knowledge, problem solving and creativity as opposed to the
388: 251: 223: 74:. Coding interviews test candidates' technical knowledge, coding ability, problem solving skills, and creativity, typically on a 198: 126:, or sometimes logic problems, and have eventually transitioned over the years into questions relevant to programming. As 480: 376: 490: 454: 95: 307: 485: 91: 150:
Typical questions that a candidate might be asked to answer during the second-round interview include:
187: 87: 55: 51: 447: 83: 404: 366: 337: 127: 266: 384: 325: 315: 288: 380: 370: 122:'s obsession with puzzles, many of the puzzles presented during interviews started off being 194: 79: 255: 165: 431: 281: 247: 182: 141: 474: 123: 115: 47: 17: 144:. Some questions involve projects that the candidate has worked on in the past. 158: 197:
questions had declined at companies including Microsoft and Google. A study by
190:("Manhole covers are round because manholes are round.") to the philosophical. 140:
questions should consider the use of technology in the present and future, and
119: 99: 75: 63: 329: 312:
Cracking the coding interview : 189 programming questions and solutions
59: 62:
during the 1990s and adopted by other large technology companies including
423: 67: 103: 71: 106:. Coding interviews are typically conducted in-person or virtually. 283:
Programming Interviews Exposed: Secrets to Landing Your Next Job
58:
position. Modern coding interview techniques were pioneered by
224:"No-Brainer: 'Brainteaser' Job Interview Questions Don't Work" 269:. Retrieved from the World Wide Web on January 16, 2006. 435: 118:
most companies used at the time. Initially based on
280: 455: 8: 361: 359: 357: 355: 353: 217: 215: 157:Design a communication device for Canadian 462: 448: 342:: CS1 maint: location missing publisher ( 181:Microsoft popularized the question of why 154:Design a GPS navigation unit for a hiker. 211: 335: 78:. Candidates usually have a degree in 267:Job Interviews Get Creative, NPR 2003 222:White, Martha C. (October 23, 2012). 50:technique to assess applicants for a 27:Problem-based job interview technique 7: 420: 418: 405:"Typical Coding Interview Questions" 25: 279:John Mongan (December 11, 2023), 422: 193:By 2012, the practice of asking 314:(6th ed.). Palo Alto, CA. 407:. OmniJobs. September 4, 2024. 199:San Francisco State University 116:goal and weaknesses interviews 1: 372:How Would You Move Mount Fuji 172:bytes, using no extra memory. 46:is a technical problem-based 434:. You can help Knowledge by 430:This computing article is a 507: 417: 377:Little, Brown and Company 94:, and are asked to solve 308:McDowell, Gayle Laakmann 250:after Google interview. 164:Shift all elements of a 254:March 13, 2011, at the 287:(2nd ed.), Wrox, 92:electrical engineering 40:programming interview 88:computer engineering 56:software development 52:computer programming 367:Poundstone, William 84:information science 44:Microsoft interview 36:technical interview 18:Microsoft Interview 128:William Poundstone 481:Microsoft culture 443: 442: 321:978-0-9847828-5-7 294:978-0-470-12167-2 16:(Redirected from 498: 464: 457: 450: 426: 419: 409: 408: 401: 395: 394: 363: 348: 347: 341: 333: 304: 298: 297: 286: 276: 270: 264: 258: 245: 239: 238: 236: 234: 219: 195:lateral thinking 80:computer science 32:coding interview 21: 506: 505: 501: 500: 499: 497: 496: 495: 491:Computing stubs 471: 470: 469: 468: 415: 413: 412: 403: 402: 398: 391: 365: 364: 351: 334: 322: 306: 305: 301: 295: 278: 277: 273: 265: 261: 256:Wayback Machine 248:Applicants blog 246: 242: 232: 230: 221: 220: 213: 208: 179: 137: 112: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 504: 502: 494: 493: 488: 483: 473: 472: 467: 466: 459: 452: 444: 441: 440: 427: 411: 410: 396: 389: 349: 320: 299: 293: 271: 259: 240: 210: 209: 207: 204: 183:manhole covers 178: 175: 174: 173: 166:circular array 162: 155: 142:user scenarios 136: 133: 124:Fermi problems 111: 108: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 503: 492: 489: 487: 486:Job interview 484: 482: 479: 478: 476: 465: 460: 458: 453: 451: 446: 445: 439: 437: 433: 428: 425: 421: 416: 406: 400: 397: 392: 390:0-316-91916-0 386: 382: 378: 374: 373: 368: 362: 360: 358: 356: 354: 350: 345: 339: 331: 327: 323: 317: 313: 309: 303: 300: 296: 290: 285: 284: 275: 272: 268: 263: 260: 257: 253: 249: 244: 241: 229: 225: 218: 216: 212: 205: 203: 200: 196: 191: 189: 184: 176: 171: 167: 163: 160: 156: 153: 152: 151: 148: 145: 143: 134: 132: 129: 125: 121: 117: 109: 107: 105: 101: 97: 93: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 65: 61: 57: 53: 49: 48:job interview 45: 41: 37: 33: 19: 436:expanding it 429: 414: 399: 371: 311: 302: 282: 274: 262: 243: 231:. Retrieved 227: 192: 188:tautological 180: 177:Manhole test 169: 159:park rangers 149: 146: 138: 113: 43: 39: 35: 31: 29: 379:. pp.  96:programming 475:Categories 375:. Boston: 206:References 120:Bill Gates 110:Innovation 100:algorithms 98:problems, 76:whiteboard 338:cite book 330:913477191 135:Questions 60:Microsoft 369:(2003). 310:(2015). 252:Archived 68:Facebook 233:July 4, 104:puzzles 387:  328:  318:  291:  72:Google 70:, and 64:Amazon 381:50–90 102:, or 432:stub 385:ISBN 344:link 326:OCLC 316:ISBN 289:ISBN 235:2022 228:Time 168:by 90:or 54:or 42:or 477:: 383:. 352:^ 340:}} 336:{{ 324:. 226:. 214:^ 86:, 82:, 66:, 38:, 34:, 30:A 463:e 456:t 449:v 438:. 393:. 346:) 332:. 237:. 170:k 161:. 20:)

Index

Microsoft Interview
job interview
computer programming
software development
Microsoft
Amazon
Facebook
Google
whiteboard
computer science
information science
computer engineering
electrical engineering
programming
algorithms
puzzles
goal and weaknesses interviews
Bill Gates
Fermi problems
William Poundstone
user scenarios
park rangers
circular array
manhole covers
tautological
lateral thinking
San Francisco State University


"No-Brainer: 'Brainteaser' Job Interview Questions Don't Work"

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.