20:
134:, and Dhāreśvara, other commentators, as authoritative sources. Derrett places the text between 1121 CE and 1125 CE, a much shorter time frame than Kane, but Kane claims that this time frame is purely arbitrary, and Derrett does not provide the evidence to support his claim. Lingat, however, is content to place the
115:
system," a system of exegetical thought focused on the interpretation of the Vedas. Contrary to
Derrett's opinion based on Yajnavalkya 2.4 and 2.305 that Vijñāneśvara was a judge, Kane holds that these passages about characteristics of judges do not reflect a social or historical reality, but rather
239:
prevailed as an authority for law. The
British were interested in administering law in India, but they wanted to administer the law that already existed to the people. Thus, they searched for a text that could be used to help solve disputes among the people of India in manners which were already
273:
in 1810 because there was an immediate need in the
British courts for the "law" (or as close as they could get to the law) regarding inheritance that already existed among the people of India. W. Macnaghten did the second translation, dealing with procedure, in 1829. Finally, J. R. Gharpure
177:." In this sense, the commentary is similar to a digest (nibandha) in that it attempts to draw into the commentary outside opinions about the same passages of the text which he is commenting on. Although he is commenting on the
195:'s most important topics include property rights, property distribution, and inheritance. This text has become the authority, especially on inheritance, throughout most of India after the British began to move in.
584:
Velcheru
Narayana Rao; Sanjay Subrahmanyam (2013). "Notes on Political Thought in Medieval and Early Modern South India". In Richard M. Eaton; Munis D. Faruqui; David Gilmartin; Sunil Kumar (eds.).
148:, and he was criticizing and discussing earlier commentaries on the same text in an attempt to reconcile differences and further explain the meaning and the significance of the text.
130:
between 974 CE and 1000 CE, but he says, "there is no evidence to establish the exact time when the work was undertaken." He places it after 1050 CE because it names Viśvarūpa,
614:
Suryanath U. Kamat, A Concise history of
Karnataka from pre-historic times to the present, Jupiter books, MCC, Bangalore, 2001 (Reprinted 2002) OCLC: 7796041
671:
414:, (Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 1975), Volume I, Part II, 610. Kane's opinion is confirmed in Ludo Rocher, "Schools of Hindu Law,"
168:
system, brings about order by assigning to various dicta their proper scope and province...and effects a synthesis of apparently unconnected
256:
held the status of a legislative text because it was used as a direct resource regarding inheritance in the courts of law in most of India.
250:
in 1810, and it was only this section of the text that gave the
British insight on how to deal with inheritance issues. At that point, the
240:
customary in the sub continent. These disputes often involved property rights or inheritance issues. Thus, the first translation of the
617:
K.A. Nilakanta Sastri, History of South India, From
Prehistoric times to fall of Vijayanagar, 1955, OUP, New Delhi (Reprinted 2002),
622:
595:
558:
140:
simply at the end of the eleventh century. Historically, Vijñāneśvara was attempting to clarify and explain parts of the
666:
490:
180:
143:
418:(Gonda Volume). Leiden, 1972, 172, who emphasizes Vijñāneśvara's self-presentation as a yogi, ascetic, or hermit.
19:
111:
of the Cālukya dynasty of Kalyāni, one of the great rulers of the Deccan. He was a "profound student of the
329:
264:
247:
164:
passages, explains away contradictions among them by following the rules of interpretation laid down in the
50:
58:
661:
54:
633:
Texts
Surrounding Texts: Satellite Stanzas, Prefaces and Colophons in South-Indian Manuscripts.
618:
591:
554:
62:
186:
587:
Expanding
Frontiers in South Asian and World History: Essays in Honour of John F. Richards
347:
342:
108:
236:
210:
70:
646:
506:
655:
131:
585:
470:, (Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 1975), Volume I, Part II, 600.
444:, (Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 1975), Volume I, Part II, 609.
431:, (Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 1975), Volume I, Part II, 609.
401:, (Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 1975), Volume I, Part II, 603.
375:, (Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 1975), Volume I, Part II, 604.
174:
100:
159:
104:
74:
66:
647:
The
Importance of Mitakshara in the 21st century by Justice Markandey Katju
504:
488:
481:
333:
322:
315:
308:
300:
289:
275:
268:
251:
241:
214:
204:
190:
178:
169:
157:
141:
135:
125:
85:
78:
43:
35:
24:
77:
from the time the British began administering laws in India. The entire
629:"Lakṣmīdevī’s 'intellectual petticoats' and the flamewar they inspired."
185:, he cites numerous earlier commentators as well, including Viśvarūpa,
165:
112:
57:
best known for its theory of "inheritance by birth." It was written by
228:
220:
338:, and also for possibly having been written by a woman, Lakṣmīdevī.
572:
Lakṣmīdevi's "intellectual petticoats" and the flamewar it inspired
628:
553:, Vol.II, Calcutta: The Ramakrishna Mission Institute of Culture,
232:
224:
18:
213:, became an influential source for British Courts in India. The
65:
court in the late eleventh century in the modern day state of
631:
219:
was influential throughout the majority of India, except in
107:), near the end of the eleventh century during the reign of
156:
Vijñāneśvara's commentary "brings together numerous
73:, it was considered one of the main authorities on
288:Several sub-commentaries have been written on the
274:provided us with a complete translation of the
91:, is approximately 492 closely printed pages.
8:
590:. Cambridge University Press. p. 176.
306:of Bālaṃbhaṭṭa Payagunde (c.1770). and the
364:
328:is notable for having greatly informed
116:an interpretation based upon Mimamsa.
7:
536:, (New York: Oxford UP, 1973), 113.
523:, (New York: Oxford UP, 1973), 113.
457:, (New York: Oxford UP, 1973), 113.
388:, (New York: Oxford UP, 1973), 113.
99:Vijñāneśvara lived at Marthur near
14:
267:did the first translation of the
672:11th-century Sanskrit literature
16:Ancient Indian legal commentary
551:The Cultural Heritage in India
503:An earlier commentator on the
1:
83:, along with the text of the
298:of Viśveśvara (c.1375), the
103:(in the modern-day state of
545:Bhattacharya, D.C. (1962).
505:
489:
482:
399:The History of Dharmaśāstra
334:
323:
316:
309:
301:
290:
276:
269:
252:
242:
215:
205:
191:
179:
170:
158:
142:
136:
126:
120:Date and historical context
86:
79:
44:
36:
25:
688:
549:in S. Radhakrishnan (ed.)
534:The Classical Law of India
521:The Classical Law of India
455:The Classical Law of India
386:The Classical Law of India
227:and some of the parts in
468:History of Dharmaśāstra
442:History of Dharmaśāstra
429:History of Dharmaśāstra
412:History of Dharmaśāstra
373:History of Dharmaśāstra
199:Effect on British India
189:, and Dhāreśvara. The
487:, a commentary of the
332:'s translation of the
30:
22:
29:, c. 18th century CE
61:, a scholar in the
667:Ancient Indian law
152:Sources and topics
55:Yajnavalkya Smriti
31:
23:Manuscript of the
491:Yājñavalkya Smṛti
341:The 13th-century
209:, along with the
181:Yājñavalkya Smṛti
144:Yājñavalkya Smṛti
87:Yājñavalkya-smṝti
69:. Along with the
679:
602:
601:
581:
575:
568:
562:
543:
537:
532:Lingat, Robert,
530:
524:
519:Lingat, Robert,
517:
511:
510:
501:
495:
494:
485:
477:
471:
464:
458:
453:Lingat, Robert,
451:
445:
438:
432:
425:
419:
408:
402:
395:
389:
384:Lingat, Robert,
382:
376:
369:
337:
326:
319:
312:
304:
294:, including the
293:
284:Sub-commentaries
279:
272:
255:
245:
218:
208:
194:
184:
173:
163:
147:
139:
129:
124:Kane places the
89:
82:
63:Kalyani Chalukya
47:
39:
28:
687:
686:
682:
681:
680:
678:
677:
676:
652:
651:
643:
611:
606:
605:
598:
583:
582:
578:
569:
565:
544:
540:
531:
527:
518:
514:
502:
498:
478:
474:
465:
461:
452:
448:
439:
435:
426:
422:
409:
405:
396:
392:
383:
379:
370:
366:
361:
348:Vijnaneshvaramu
343:Telugu language
286:
262:
201:
154:
122:
109:Vikramaditya VI
97:
17:
12:
11:
5:
685:
683:
675:
674:
669:
664:
654:
653:
650:
649:
642:
641:External links
639:
638:
637:
625:
615:
610:
607:
604:
603:
596:
576:
563:
538:
525:
512:
496:
479:Author of the
472:
459:
446:
433:
420:
403:
390:
377:
363:
362:
360:
357:
285:
282:
261:
258:
200:
197:
153:
150:
121:
118:
96:
93:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
684:
673:
670:
668:
665:
663:
660:
659:
657:
648:
645:
644:
640:
636:11 June 2021.
635:
634:
630:
626:
624:
623:0-19-560686-8
620:
616:
613:
612:
608:
599:
597:9781107034280
593:
589:
588:
580:
577:
573:
570:Li, Charles,
567:
564:
560:
559:81-85843-03-1
556:
552:
548:
547:The Nibandhas
542:
539:
535:
529:
526:
522:
516:
513:
509:
508:
500:
497:
493:
492:
486:
484:
476:
473:
469:
466:Kane, P. V.,
463:
460:
456:
450:
447:
443:
440:Kane, P. V.,
437:
434:
430:
427:Kane, P. V.,
424:
421:
417:
413:
410:Kane, P. V.,
407:
404:
400:
397:Kane, P. V.,
394:
391:
387:
381:
378:
374:
371:Kane, P. V.,
368:
365:
358:
356:
354:
350:
349:
344:
339:
336:
331:
327:
325:
318:
313:
311:
305:
303:
297:
292:
283:
281:
278:
271:
266:
259:
257:
254:
249:
244:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
217:
212:
207:
198:
196:
193:
188:
183:
182:
176:
172:
167:
162:
161:
151:
149:
146:
145:
138:
133:
128:
119:
117:
114:
110:
106:
102:
94:
92:
90:
88:
81:
76:
72:
68:
64:
60:
56:
52:
48:
46:
40:
38:
27:
21:
632:
627:Charles Li,
586:
579:
571:
566:
550:
546:
541:
533:
528:
520:
515:
499:
480:
475:
467:
462:
454:
449:
441:
436:
428:
423:
415:
411:
406:
398:
393:
385:
380:
372:
367:
352:
351:is based on
346:
340:
321:
317:Nandapaṇḍita
310:Pratītākṣarā
307:
299:
295:
287:
263:
260:Translations
235:, where the
202:
155:
123:
98:
84:
59:Vijñāneśvara
42:
34:
32:
416:India Maior
324:Bālaṃbhaṭṭī
302:Bālaṃbhaṭṭī
175:injunctions
656:Categories
609:References
330:Colebrooke
265:Colebrooke
248:Colebrooke
187:Mēdhātithi
132:Medhātithi
101:Kalaburagi
51:commentary
662:Hindu law
507:Manusmṛti
483:Bālakrīḍā
353:Mitākṣarā
335:Mitākṣarā
296:Subodhinī
291:Mitākṣarā
277:Mitākṣarā
270:Mitākṣarā
253:Mitākṣarā
243:Mitākṣarā
237:Dāyabhāga
216:Mitākṣarā
211:Dāyabhāga
206:Mitākṣarā
192:Mitākṣarā
137:Mitākṣarā
127:Mitākṣarā
105:Karnataka
80:Mitākṣarā
75:Hindu Law
71:Dāyabhāga
67:Karnataka
53:) on the
37:Mitākṣarā
26:Mitākṣarā
574:, 2021.
561:, p.366
246:was by
166:Mimamsa
113:Mimamsa
49:(legal
621:
594:
557:
320:. The
229:Odisha
221:Bengal
95:Author
45:vivṛti
359:Notes
345:text
233:Bihar
225:Assam
171:smṛti
160:smṛti
41:is a
619:ISBN
592:ISBN
555:ISBN
231:and
203:The
33:The
314:of
658::
355:.
280:.
223:,
600:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
