Knowledge (XXG)

Mitchell v. United States (1999)

Source 📝

367:
drug, her counsel argued that the quantity of cocaine attributable to her for sentencing purposes was less than the threshold. The District Court ruled that as a result of her guilty plea, Mitchell had forfeited the right to remain silent about the crime's details. The District Court accepted the testimony of her co-defendants' that put her over the five-kilogram threshold and that therefore the 10-year minimum sentence was mandated. It also noted that her failure to testify contributed to the court's decision to accept the co-defendants' testimony. The Court of Appeals affirmed this decision.
38: 376:
that a court's ruling can be made on assumption. The court's decision supported that a ruling should be made based on facts. In addition, had the court allowed for an inference to be made from silence, suspicions would then inherently supersede and contradict the principle that defendants are innocent until proven guilty.
375:
The court held that a guilty plea is not also a waiver of the privilege at sentencing. It also held that the trial court may not draw adverse inference by the defendant's silence while facts bearing upon the severity of the sentence are considered. Any inference of the defendant's silence advocates
366:
During the sentencing hearing, the District Court heard testimony from some of Mitchell's codefendants, that the amount of Mitchell's alleged drug sales put her over the five-kilogram threshold. Although Mitchell did not testify in defense of the government's changes regarding the quantity of the
358:
for the conspiracy offense and a mandatory minimum of ten years in prison if the prosecution could prove the amount of cocaine involved was the required five kilograms necessary for the longer sentence. Mitchell was told that by making a guilty plea she was waiving her
173:
privilege against self-incrimination at sentencing, and the sentencing court may not draw adverse inferences in determining facts related to the circumstances of the crime and bearing upon the sentence when a defendant invokes
333:
during the sentencing phase of the trial, and that the court cannot draw an adverse inference from the defendant's silence when determining facts related to the crime which affect the severity of the sentence.
1315: 1325: 474: 421: 385: 79: 395: 156: 119: 354:
quantity under the conspiracy count during her sentencing hearing. She was told before her plea was accepted, that she faced a mandatory minimum sentence of one year in
542: 360: 310: 284: 170: 533: 545: 1310: 17: 390: 1320: 1014: 526: 288: 42: 559: 759: 939: 519: 826: 963: 896: 660: 703: 306: 1251: 1179: 588: 1063: 727: 604: 1171: 1030: 979: 1219: 1075: 1211: 971: 915: 861: 794: 786: 719: 620: 511: 711: 152: 115: 1195: 1139: 845: 818: 810: 743: 684: 676: 641: 322: 205: 1243: 1115: 1083: 955: 853: 572: 478: 425: 133: 71: 1099: 1006: 877: 330: 1235: 1203: 1155: 1147: 1107: 923: 767: 233: 1187: 1123: 1091: 1038: 1022: 612: 343: 318: 1227: 931: 869: 751: 197: 189: 1275: 1131: 998: 947: 149: 112: 1267: 802: 735: 668: 444: 229: 217: 485: 1259: 596: 494: 428: 241: 209: 1304: 1283: 580: 221: 74: 292: 326: 124: 90: 314: 86: 503: 350:
and pleaded guilty. However, Mitchell reserved the right to contest the
342:
Amanda Mitchell was indicted, along with co-defendants, for one count of
347: 355: 351: 1061: 639: 557: 515: 37: 1316:
United States Fifth Amendment self-incrimination case law
1326:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
386:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 526
396:
Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume
258:
Kennedy, joined by Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
990: 907: 888: 837: 778: 695: 652: 278: 270: 262: 254: 249: 178: 163: 140: 103: 98: 66: 56: 49: 30: 325:. The court ruled that a defendant who waives the 527: 266:Scalia, joined by Rehnquist, O'Connor, Thomas 144:Sentence vacated, remanded for resentencing, 8: 61:Amanda Mitchell v. United States of America 1058: 649: 636: 554: 534: 520: 512: 27: 413: 411: 391:List of United States Supreme Court cases 363:right to remain silent during the trial. 346:to distribute five or more kilograms of 407: 439: 437: 1015:Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber 25:1999 United States Supreme Court case 7: 43:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 1311:United States Supreme Court cases 481:314 (1999) is available from: 313:privileges related to a criminal 169:A guilty plea does not waive the 760:Bravo-Fernandez v. United States 36: 1321:1999 in United States case law 1: 543:United States Fifth Amendment 964:Puerto Rico v. Sanchez Valle 897:Blockburger v. United States 661:Blockburger v. United States 305:, 526 U.S. 314 (1999), is a 704:United States v. Randenbush 445:"Mitchell v. United States" 309:case that considered two 307:United States Supreme Court 1342: 1252:J. D. B. v. North Carolina 1180:Dickerson v. United States 589:Wong Wing v. United States 504:Oyez (oral argument audio) 15: 1164:Mitchell v. United States 1070: 1064:Self-Incrimination Clause 1057: 908:Dual sovereignty doctrine 728:Fong Foo v. United States 653:Meaning of "same offense" 648: 635: 605:United States v. Moreland 567: 553: 471:Mitchell v. United States 418:Mitchell v. United States 302:Mitchell v. United States 283: 183: 168: 146:United States v. Mitchell 130:Mitchell v. United States 109:United States v. Mitchell 35: 31:Mitchell v. United States 18:Mitchell v. United States 1172:United States v. Hubbell 1031:North Carolina v. Pearce 980:Denezpi v. United States 940:United States v. Wheeler 329:does not also waive the 1220:Corley v. United States 1212:United States v. Patane 1076:Curcio v. United States 972:Gamble v. United States 862:United States v. Dinitz 795:Ludwig v. Massachusetts 787:United States v. Wilson 720:Burton v. United States 621:United States v. Cotton 50:Argued December 9, 1998 1196:Yarborough v. Alvarado 916:United States v. Lanza 846:United States v. Perez 827:Smith v. United States 819:United States v. Dixon 811:United States v. Felix 744:Burks v. United States 685:United States v. Dixon 677:United States v. Felix 642:Double Jeopardy Clause 323:Federal District Court 1244:Berghuis v. Thompkins 1084:Griffin v. California 956:United States v. Lara 854:United States v. Jorn 712:Ball v. United States 573:Hurtado v. California 85:119 S. Ct. 1307; 143 52:Decided April 5, 1999 1140:Doe v. United States 1007:Palko v. Connecticut 878:Blueford v. Arkansas 285:U.S. Const. amend. V 16:For other uses, see 1236:Maryland v. Shatzer 1204:Missouri v. Seibert 1156:McNeil v. Wisconsin 1148:Illinois v. Perkins 1108:Williams v. Florida 924:Bartkus v. Illinois 889:Multiple punishment 768:McElrath v. Georgia 317:’s rights against 234:Ruth Bader Ginsburg 206:Sandra Day O'Connor 107:Sentence affirmed, 1188:Chavez v. Martinez 1124:Edwards v. Arizona 1116:Michigan v. Tucker 1092:Miranda v. Arizona 1039:Benton v. Maryland 1023:Baxstrom v. Herold 613:Beck v. Washington 546:criminal procedure 319:self-incrimination 194:Associate Justices 1298: 1297: 1294: 1293: 1228:Florida v. Powell 1100:Boulden v. Holman 1053: 1052: 1049: 1048: 932:Waller v. Florida 870:Oregon v. Kennedy 752:Evans v. Michigan 631: 630: 298: 297: 190:William Rehnquist 1333: 1276:Salinas v. Texas 1132:Oregon v. Elstad 1059: 999:Ex parte Bigelow 948:Heath v. Alabama 779:After conviction 650: 637: 555: 536: 529: 522: 513: 508: 502: 499: 493: 490: 484: 457: 456: 454: 452: 441: 432: 415: 179:Court membership 40: 39: 28: 1341: 1340: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1290: 1268:Howes v. Fields 1066: 1045: 986: 903: 884: 833: 803:Grady v. Corbin 774: 736:Ashe v. Swenson 696:After acquittal 691: 669:Grady v. Corbin 644: 627: 563: 549: 540: 506: 500: 497: 491: 488: 482: 466: 461: 460: 450: 448: 443: 442: 435: 416: 409: 404: 382: 373: 361:Fifth Amendment 340: 311:Fifth Amendment 232: 230:Clarence Thomas 220: 218:Anthony Kennedy 208: 198:John P. Stevens 171:Fifth Amendment 94: 51: 45: 26: 21: 12: 11: 5: 1339: 1337: 1329: 1328: 1323: 1318: 1313: 1303: 1302: 1296: 1295: 1292: 1291: 1289: 1288: 1280: 1272: 1264: 1260:Bobby v. Dixon 1256: 1248: 1240: 1232: 1224: 1216: 1208: 1200: 1192: 1184: 1176: 1168: 1160: 1152: 1144: 1136: 1128: 1120: 1112: 1104: 1096: 1088: 1080: 1071: 1068: 1067: 1062: 1055: 1054: 1051: 1050: 1047: 1046: 1044: 1043: 1035: 1027: 1019: 1011: 1003: 994: 992: 988: 987: 985: 984: 976: 968: 960: 952: 944: 936: 928: 920: 911: 909: 905: 904: 902: 901: 892: 890: 886: 885: 883: 882: 874: 866: 858: 850: 841: 839: 838:After mistrial 835: 834: 832: 831: 823: 815: 807: 799: 791: 782: 780: 776: 775: 773: 772: 764: 756: 748: 740: 732: 724: 716: 708: 699: 697: 693: 692: 690: 689: 681: 673: 665: 656: 654: 646: 645: 640: 633: 632: 629: 628: 626: 625: 617: 609: 601: 597:Maxwell v. Dow 593: 585: 577: 568: 565: 564: 558: 551: 550: 541: 539: 538: 531: 524: 516: 510: 509: 465: 464:External links 462: 459: 458: 433: 406: 405: 403: 400: 399: 398: 393: 388: 381: 378: 372: 369: 339: 336: 296: 295: 289:18 U.S.C. 281: 280: 276: 275: 272: 268: 267: 264: 260: 259: 256: 252: 251: 247: 246: 245: 244: 242:Stephen Breyer 210:Antonin Scalia 195: 192: 187: 181: 180: 176: 175: 166: 165: 161: 160: 142: 138: 137: 105: 101: 100: 96: 95: 84: 68: 64: 63: 58: 57:Full case name 54: 53: 47: 46: 41: 33: 32: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1338: 1327: 1324: 1322: 1319: 1317: 1314: 1312: 1309: 1308: 1306: 1286: 1285: 1284:Vega v. Tekoh 1281: 1278: 1277: 1273: 1270: 1269: 1265: 1262: 1261: 1257: 1254: 1253: 1249: 1246: 1245: 1241: 1238: 1237: 1233: 1230: 1229: 1225: 1222: 1221: 1217: 1214: 1213: 1209: 1206: 1205: 1201: 1198: 1197: 1193: 1190: 1189: 1185: 1182: 1181: 1177: 1174: 1173: 1169: 1166: 1165: 1161: 1158: 1157: 1153: 1150: 1149: 1145: 1142: 1141: 1137: 1134: 1133: 1129: 1126: 1125: 1121: 1118: 1117: 1113: 1110: 1109: 1105: 1102: 1101: 1097: 1094: 1093: 1089: 1086: 1085: 1081: 1078: 1077: 1073: 1072: 1069: 1065: 1060: 1056: 1041: 1040: 1036: 1033: 1032: 1028: 1025: 1024: 1020: 1017: 1016: 1012: 1009: 1008: 1004: 1001: 1000: 996: 995: 993: 989: 982: 981: 977: 974: 973: 969: 966: 965: 961: 958: 957: 953: 950: 949: 945: 942: 941: 937: 934: 933: 929: 926: 925: 921: 918: 917: 913: 912: 910: 906: 899: 898: 894: 893: 891: 887: 880: 879: 875: 872: 871: 867: 864: 863: 859: 856: 855: 851: 848: 847: 843: 842: 840: 836: 829: 828: 824: 821: 820: 816: 813: 812: 808: 805: 804: 800: 797: 796: 792: 789: 788: 784: 783: 781: 777: 770: 769: 765: 762: 761: 757: 754: 753: 749: 746: 745: 741: 738: 737: 733: 730: 729: 725: 722: 721: 717: 714: 713: 709: 706: 705: 701: 700: 698: 694: 687: 686: 682: 679: 678: 674: 671: 670: 666: 663: 662: 658: 657: 655: 651: 647: 643: 638: 634: 623: 622: 618: 615: 614: 610: 607: 606: 602: 599: 598: 594: 591: 590: 586: 583: 582: 581:Ex parte Bain 578: 575: 574: 570: 569: 566: 561: 556: 552: 547: 544: 537: 532: 530: 525: 523: 518: 517: 514: 505: 496: 487: 480: 476: 472: 468: 467: 463: 446: 440: 438: 434: 430: 427: 423: 419: 414: 412: 408: 401: 397: 394: 392: 389: 387: 384: 383: 379: 377: 370: 368: 364: 362: 357: 353: 349: 345: 338:Circumstances 337: 335: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 303: 294: 290: 286: 282: 277: 273: 269: 265: 261: 257: 253: 250:Case opinions 248: 243: 239: 235: 231: 227: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 199: 196: 193: 191: 188: 186:Chief Justice 185: 184: 182: 177: 172: 167: 162: 158: 154: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 131: 127: 126: 121: 117: 114: 110: 106: 102: 97: 92: 88: 82: 81: 76: 73: 69: 65: 62: 59: 55: 48: 44: 34: 29: 23: 19: 1282: 1274: 1266: 1258: 1250: 1242: 1234: 1226: 1218: 1210: 1202: 1194: 1186: 1178: 1170: 1163: 1162: 1154: 1146: 1138: 1130: 1122: 1114: 1106: 1098: 1090: 1082: 1074: 1037: 1029: 1021: 1013: 1005: 997: 978: 970: 962: 954: 946: 938: 930: 922: 914: 895: 876: 868: 860: 852: 844: 825: 817: 809: 801: 793: 785: 766: 758: 750: 742: 734: 726: 718: 710: 702: 683: 675: 667: 659: 619: 611: 603: 595: 587: 579: 571: 470: 451:February 14, 449:. Retrieved 431: (1999). 417: 374: 365: 341: 301: 300: 299: 279:Laws applied 237: 225: 222:David Souter 213: 201: 145: 129: 123: 108: 99:Case history 78: 60: 22: 327:guilty plea 1305:Categories 560:Grand Jury 447:. oyez.org 344:conspiracy 293:§ 846 141:Subsequent 125:certiorari 91:U.S. LEXIS 89:424; 1999 402:Footnotes 331:privilege 315:defendant 128:granted, 87:L. Ed. 2d 67:Citations 548:case law 469:Text of 380:See also 371:Decision 255:Majority 486:Cornell 348:cocaine 271:Dissent 263:Dissent 164:Holding 157:3d Cir. 122:1997); 120:3d Cir. 1287:(2022) 1279:(2013) 1271:(2012) 1263:(2011) 1255:(2011) 1247:(2010) 1239:(2010) 1231:(2010) 1223:(2009) 1215:(2004) 1207:(2004) 1199:(2004) 1191:(2003) 1183:(2000) 1175:(2000) 1167:(1999) 1159:(1991) 1151:(1990) 1143:(1988) 1135:(1985) 1127:(1981) 1119:(1974) 1111:(1970) 1103:(1969) 1095:(1966) 1087:(1965) 1079:(1957) 1042:(1969) 1034:(1969) 1026:(1966) 1018:(1947) 1010:(1937) 1002:(1885) 983:(2022) 975:(2019) 967:(2016) 959:(2004) 951:(1985) 943:(1978) 935:(1970) 927:(1959) 919:(1922) 900:(1932) 881:(2012) 873:(1982) 865:(1976) 857:(1971) 849:(1824) 830:(2023) 822:(1993) 814:(1992) 806:(1990) 798:(1976) 790:(1833) 771:(2024) 763:(2016) 755:(2013) 747:(1978) 739:(1970) 731:(1962) 723:(1906) 715:(1896) 707:(1834) 688:(1993) 680:(1992) 672:(1990) 664:(1932) 624:(2002) 616:(1962) 608:(1922) 600:(1900) 592:(1896) 584:(1887) 576:(1884) 562:Clause 507:  501:  498:  495:Justia 492:  489:  483:  356:prison 291:  274:Thomas 240: 238:· 236:  228: 226:· 224:  216: 214:· 212:  204: 202:· 200:  148:, 187 132:, 524 111:, 122 991:Other 477: 424: 321:in a 159:1999) 104:Prior 479:U.S. 453:2008 426:U.S. 352:drug 150:F.3d 136:925. 134:U.S. 113:F.3d 93:2348 80:more 72:U.S. 70:526 475:526 429:314 422:526 174:it. 153:331 116:185 75:314 1307:: 473:, 436:^ 420:, 410:^ 287:; 535:e 528:t 521:v 455:. 155:( 118:( 83:) 77:( 20:.

Index

Mitchell v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
U.S.
314
more
L. Ed. 2d
U.S. LEXIS
F.3d
185
3d Cir.
certiorari
U.S.
F.3d
331
3d Cir.
Fifth Amendment
William Rehnquist
John P. Stevens
Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy
David Souter
Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer
U.S. Const. amend. V
18 U.S.C.
§ 846
United States Supreme Court
Fifth Amendment

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.