393:
activities that humans participate in, and these activities cannot be substituted out for an objective list of morals to be utilized. Humans are restrained by the fact that criticisms cannot communicate messages for forms of artwork, and only the artworks can communicate their messages. The second way in how film critics are able to write criticisms that involve critical discussions containing rationality involves critics analyzing their reasons for not liking specific movies, and critics must discover if they dislike movies for the same criteria that caused them to initially dislike specific movies. That requires utilizing criticism that is analytical and thorough with detail. The third way in how film critics are able to write criticisms that involve critical discussions containing rationality involves critics making blatant statements that are scientific in regards to the workings of films, and how the films are able to affect people. In fact, viewers can watch films to see if they are affected by the movies in the same way that the film critics were affected by them. The fourth way in how film critics are able to write criticisms that involve critical discussions containing rationality involves critics being less arrogant when they want they perceptions of films to be talked about, and critics must be aware of criticisms that have been published. The critics who want to argue must base their arguments in criticisms that have been stated by other critics. The fourth way in how film critics are able to write criticisms that involve critical discussions containing rationality pertains to critics moving away from the idea that artwork such as a film shall have clear meanings. Instead, critics must view artwork such as films to be the results of working hard, many hours of thinking, and ideas being compromised for meanings to not be clear. This research concludes that film critics must repeatedly view films as a way of studying them, if they desire to write thorough reviews on those particular films. Secondly, film critics have the task of making sure that they are highly informed about the film and film critics are also responsible for initiating the discussions about the films. Film critics are also responsible for knowing the creators of the films. Thirdly, film critics must blatantly state their own biases and preferences without associating them with any theories. Fourthly, film critics must appreciate the films that are given positive criticisms and film critics must not be ungrateful towards those films. Finally, a film critic must enjoy the movies that they are criticizing. In this specific regard, a film critic must also want to make their reviews persuade other people watch the movies that the film critic has criticized.
675:
offices over a duration of eight weeks of time, which displays the fact that film critics are influential towards how well films perform in box offices. Film critics are able to influence the choices of people in the public who decide on whether or not they will view a film. Film critics frequently receive invitations to early viewings of movies before the movies are available to all of the moviegoers who aren't film critics, and viewing films at early points in time allows the film critics to write film reviews that are influential to other moviegoers. Film critics have access to information regarding the earliest phases of films, unlike the public, and the earliest phases of films are when film critics are the only reliable sources of information pertaining to the movies that will be in theaters. Research has also displayed the fact that film critics desire to give moviegoers encouragement towards viewing films that are worth viewing while they also display innovation, instead of viewing movies that are simplistic.
730:, Kate Kilkenny argued that women were better represented in film criticism before the rise of the Internet. In the past, when film was considered less prestigious than visual art and literature, it was easier for women to break into film criticism. In the year 1929, Iris Barry was a female film critic from Britain. When Barry lived in London, she earned money from being a writer for magazines, a newspaper, and periodical articles. Barry wrote film criticisms that discussed films that were made in Britain, films that were made in America, and Barry only wrote film criticisms on a selective amount of German movies. Barry also wrote film criticisms for French movies that were made as experiments. Barry wrote film criticisms with a critical amount of analysis.
179:
having vocabularies that were limited. During the 1930s, the jobs of critics weren't perceived to be great and critics did not earn high wages for their work. The next difficult challenge involves the fact that the industry related to film even attempted to use intimidation as a way of making movie critics cease with reviewing films. In the year of 1948, a critic named Eileen Arnot
Robertson was forcibly removed from her job as a critic. Despite the fact that she filed a lawsuit against the film industry, the film industry said that Robertson's firing did not occur out of maliciousness. These difficult challenges led to the existences of movie critics who had respect for films, and those new film critics sought to make film criticism be a respected job.
115:
criticism, which is grounded in the media's effects being developed, and journalistic criticism resides in standard structures such as newspapers. Journal articles pertaining to films served as representatives for the film critics who desired to increase the amount of communication about movies to a high degree that ascended above content that was normally featured in popular publications. The critics who work in the media are normally commissionaires who affect culture, since the judgments and choices of critics have the effect of influencing what audience members perceive about objects that are supplied to them, and critics are also able to influence how the audience members choose to think about objects that are supplied to them.
402:
connection between film critics evaluating films and audience members having interests or no interests in viewing those films. Based in the perspective of an audience member, a review serves as more than an object that is useful for making decisions. Listening to a review from a critic, watching a critic's review, and reading a critic's review are all ways in which the review is useful to an audience member. The critic's review is able to be referenced in conversations where audience members communicate with other individuals, and audience members can communicate messages about the artistic film that was critically examined or connect the criticism to problems that occur in society.
519:
reviews that were posted at prior points in time also increases. This ends up making individuals experience increases in their desires to write movie reviews about films that are earning high quantities of money. When movies are given high ratings, those high ratings are able to persuade viewers of movies to watch other films that share aspects of the movies that viewers prefer to see. The explanations for why movies are given high ratings are able to reach online groups of people who watch movies, and the explanations for movies having high ratings are explained through the usage of reviews that are posted in those online groups.
66:
702:
created knowledge, which ended up appearing in areas that had been useful for writing film criticisms in a traditional style. Writing about academic films puts emphasis on generalized statements that can be verified. Writing academic films also involves film critics preferring to view films that are typical, instead of viewing films that are bizarre. That is because ordinary kinds of films can be reviewed with generalized statements that can be verified.
880:
515:, and have the same advantages and disadvantages; notably, there is no guarantee that they will be a representative sample of the film's audience. In some cases, online review sites have produced wildly differing results to scientific polling of audiences. Likewise, reviews and ratings for many movies can greatly differ between the different review sites, even though there are certain movies that are well-rated (or poorly-rated) across the board.
535:, academic critique explores cinema beyond journalistic film reviews. These film critics try to examine why film works, how it works aesthetically or politically, what it means, and what effects it has on people. Rather than write for mass-market publications their articles are usually published in scholarly journals and texts which tend to be affiliated with university presses; or sometimes in up-market magazines.
427:, which is a large data storage on the internet that stores interviews, reviews about movies, news, and other kinds of materials that pertain to specific films. These areas of storage are not intended to help people find specific films or movie content that has aired on television, but the storages are able to help people find reliable film criticisms that can be used as readings for students.
3894:
866:
471:
original statements online, but there are websites that will steal their ideas and not give credit to the author. Another challenge in film criticism pertains to film critics being pressured into writing reviews that are hasty, since users of the internet will give their attention to other topics if film critics do not post movie reviews quickly.
207:
Audience members changed how they behaved in movie theaters, since they would shush people as a way of communicating the messages related to telling other people that they needed to be silent. By keeping themselves in silence, audience members such as film critics were able to make all of their attention be on the movies that they were watching.
440:
placed alongside parts of other films for the sound effects or images from the other films to be used in criticizing the sounds or images that pertain to the YouTube clips that are being criticized. Film critics are also reviewers who are amateurs on websites such as IMDb. Also, many postings from amateur film critics are on IMDb.
119:
cultural type of criticism, which is also referred to as academic criticism, and academic criticism is able to primarily make interpretations of films from the viewpoint of directors while the interpretations place emphasis on parallels that films have with previous works that were deemed to be of high quality.
456:. Some online niche websites provide comprehensive coverage of the independent sector; usually adopting a style closer to print journalism. They tend to prohibit advertisement and offer uncompromising opinions free of any commercial interest. Their film critics normally have an academic film background.
738:
were two of the most influential film critics of the 1960s and 1970s. The
Internet led to a decline in jobs at small newspapers where women were more likely to review films, whereas the more male-dominated jobs at major newspapers survived better. The Internet also encouraged a growth in niche review
518:
Research has found that moviegoers are inclined to leave reviews for films that are not available in movie theaters, and the amount of reviews will decrease as the films earn more money each week. When the amount of money that films earn in movie theaters is increasing, the expected quantity of movie
470:
Online film criticism has provided online film critics with challenges related to journalism's purpose changing on the internet. For example, critics must contend with the drawback of too many critics being online to the extent of preventing critics from writing original statements. Critics can write
443:
Some websites specialize in narrow aspects of film reviewing. For instance, there are sites that focus on specific content advisories for parents to judge a film's suitability for children. Others focus on a religious perspective (e.g. CAP Alert). Still others highlight more esoteric subjects such as
594:
Academic film criticism tackles many aspects of film making and production as well as distribution. These disciplines include camera work, digitalization, lighting, and sound. Narratives, dialogues, themes, and genres are among many other things that academic film critics take into consideration and
710:
There have been many complaints against the film-criticism industry for its underrepresentation of women. A study of the top critics on Rotten
Tomatoes shows that 91 per cent of writers for movie or entertainment magazines and websites are men, as are 90 per cent of those for trade publications, 80
674:
Film critics are able to be influencers in the circumstances of persuading moviegoers to view or not view in the beginning weeks of movies being available for people to view them. Research has found that negative and positive film reviews are connected to the amounts of money that films earn in box
174:
were analyzing film for its merit and value, and as more than just entertainment. The growing popularity of the medium caused major newspapers to start hiring film critics. In the 1930s, the film industry saw audiences grow increasingly silent as films were now accompanied by sound. However, in the
762:
was fascinating. There's a subset of male critics that clearly see Nancy Meyers as code for chick flick and react with according bile. What's very interesting, though, is that I think female critics, working in an industry that is coded as very male, if not macho, often feel the need to go hard on
538:
Most academic criticism of film often follows a similar format. They usually include summaries of the plot of the film to either refresh the plot to the reader or reinforce an idea of repetition in the film's genre. After this, there tends to be discussions about the cultural context, major themes
479:
Community-driven review sites, that allow internet users to submit personal movie reviews, have allowed the common movie goer to express their opinion on films. Many of these sites allow users to rate films on a 0 to 10 scale, while some rely on the star rating system of 1–5, 0–5 or 0–4 stars. The
392:
Research says that there are ways in how film critics are able to write criticisms that involve critical discussions containing rationality. When critics are looking for film criticisms that are factual, they must not behave with excessive optimism or be too demanding. Creations and criticisms are
206:
The film industry also got the chance to see that sound was able to influence how people behaved in movie theaters. When people spoke or made other kinds of sounds, they would be causing disruptions that created difficulties for people to listen to the conversations that were occurring in films.
178:
In the decades of the 1930s and the 1940s, the type of criticism pertaining to films had to overcome some difficult challenges. The first difficult challenge involves how film criticism in the 1930s decade did not have any stable foundations to reside on, and film criticism also involved critics
701:
Research says that academic studies pertaining to films had a thorough histiography pertaining to films, which also included different styles of films throughout history. However, the academic studies almost made film criticism reach its end. The academic type of writing pertaining to films had
439:
where people can post their own content. That is because blogging has created new ways for people to make themselves engage with cinematic movies. People who engage themselves with movies choose to participate in various forms of film criticism by using video or DVD clips from YouTube that are
114:
Film criticism is also labeled as a type of writing that perceives films as possible achievements and wishes to convey their differences, as well as the films being made in a level of quality that is satisfactory or unsatisfactory. Film criticism is also associated with the journalistic type of
586:
Academic film criticism is associated with formalism, which involves visual aspects and the rules regarding how they are organized as if they were forms of artwork. Formalism also involves stages of development occurring in an orderly manner, such as learning easy instructions before learning
182:
In the 1940s, new forms of criticism emerged. Essays analyzing films were written with a distinctive charm and style, and sought to persuade the reader to accept the critic's argument. This trend brought film criticism into the mainstream, gaining the attention of many popular magazines; this
118:
In the current era of history, film criticism is rich in having digital devices that allow films to be analyzed through visual and auditory methods that involve critical strategies of creativity that allow people to become immersed in film criticism. Film criticism is also associated with the
401:
In the academic field of films and cinema, several studies involving research have discovered a positive connection between film critics evaluating films and how well the films perform with audience members. Also, studies involving research in the fields of films and cinema have discovered a
631:
The critics that participated in academic film criticism during the years between 2002 and 2006 had written reviews pertaining to the fact that they disapproved of modern films that were in the horror genre. In the year 2002, a critic named
Reynold Humphries made his own discussion in
660:
Green film criticism is defined as eco-cinecriticism. This pertains to the specific film critics who are interested in environmental types of films. The cinematic counterpart to writings about nature is the creation of documentaries on nature and films that are about wild creatures.
647:
philosophy that segments of films are not artistic works on their own, and they are just unemotional aspects of reality. When those segments of films are sequenced in the form of a montage, then the films are artwork. The second film theory is that films are related to reality.
838:, and they are now assessing works in all disciplines in line with wider social justice criteria. Does the artwork highlight social justice issues? Does it adequately meet Equality and Diversity briefs? Is the artwork, in one of the words of the age,
575:
Historical, a form of criticism that doesn't look at the direct things being said, but the culture and surrounding environments of a given film. The historical critic will create meaning from something that is not explicitly stated or shown in the
587:
difficult ones. Stages of development in formalism also involved organized stages of development that are orderly, and one example involves people learning simple instructions before they have to follow instructions that involve complexity.
231:, and online publications mainly review new releases, although they also review older films. An important task for these reviews is to help readers decide whether they want to see a particular film. A film review will typically explain the
154:
wrote a manifesto proclaiming cinema to be the "Sixth Art" (later "Seventh Art"). For many decades after, film was still being accorded less prestige than longer-established art forms. In Sweden, serious film criticism was spearheaded by
245:). Film reviews are created with the purposes of making the characters, movie plots, and the directors be known in detailed descriptions to influence audience members into deciding if films need to be viewed or be ignored.
853:
As of 2013, American film critics earned about US$ 82,000 a year. Newspaper and magazine critics made $ 27,364-$ 49,574. Online movie critics earned $ 2-$ 200 per review. TV critics made up to $ 40,000-$ 60,000 per month.
590:
Academic film criticism is also associated with structuralism, which involves controlling a situation in an attempt to make it be coherent, and all the aspects of a situation are assumed to be in a structured order.
682:) are increasing the collective influence of film critics. The underperformance of several films in 2017 was blamed on their low scores on Rotten Tomatoes. This has led to studies such as one commissioned by
106:
and other popular mass-media outlets. Academic film criticism rarely takes the form of a review; instead it is more likely to analyse the film and its place in the history of its genre, the industry and
636:
reach its end when he said that the horror genre's films were not good, and
Humphries also stated that films in the horror genre weren't enjoyable. A critic named Kendall Phillips wrote a book titled
919:
582:
Political and economic, which not only looks into how economics and politics are depicted directly inside the film, but also how it affects the film's creation, marketing, screening, and sale.
542:
Academic film criticism, or film studies can also be taught in academia, and is featured in many
California colleges because they are located near the home of the United States film industry:
788:
was used evaluate the representation of women in 270 films. Johanson complied statistics for the year 2015 on how having a female protagonist affected a movie, with the following results:
384:, which became syndicated in the 1980s. Both critics had established their careers in print media, and continued to write reviews for newspapers during the run of their television show.
739:
websites that were even more male-dominated than older media. Kilkenny also suggested that the shortage of female critics was related to the shortage of female opinion columnists.
643:
Film theory is also part of academic film criticism, since two main film theories have been created. The first main film theory is the part-whole theory. This theory pertains to
423:
seek to improve the usefulness of film reviews by compiling them and assigning a score to each in order to gauge the general reception a film receives. Another aggregator is the
127:
Film was introduced in the late 19th century. The earliest artistic criticism of film emerged in the early 1900s. The first paper to serve as a critique of the film came out of
3522:
693:
Today, fan-run film analysis websites like Box Office
Prophets, CineBee and Box Office Guru routinely factor more into the opinions of the general public on films produced.
183:
eventually made film reviews and critiques a staple among most print media. As the decades passed, some critics gained fame, and a few became household names, among them
2179:
Hantke, Steffen (2007). "Academic Film
Criticism, the Rhetoric of Crisis, and the Current State of American Horror Cinema: Thoughts on Canonicity and Academic Anxiety".
3836:
175:
late 1930s audiences became influenced by print news sources reporting on movies and criticism became largely centered around audience reactions within the theaters.
1095:
640:, and ending the book during the year 2006 involved Phillips saying that American horror films had fallen into the cycle of being movies that had predictability.
2656:
1972:
565:
Academic criticism is typically divided and taught in the form of many different disciplines that tackle critique in different manors. These can include:
46:
3857:
2877:
777:
pointed out that "men tend to look much more favorably on films with more masculine themes, or male leading actors." On online review sites such as
572:
Structuralism, that examines the way that movies are sequenced, have a dedicated style, and the way that language and art itself can create meaning.
435:
Blogs are a good example to view in relation to how the internet has grown to where social networks and live chats exist alongside websites such as
3515:
3850:
511:
On these online review sites, users generally only have to register with the site in order to submit reviews. This means that they are a form of
1802:"The impact of peer-produced criticism on cultural evaluation: A multilevel analysis of discourse employment in online and offline film reviews"
3646:
2407:"Academic Film Criticism, the Rhetoric of Crisis, and the Current State of American Horror Cinema: Thoughts on Canonicity and Academic Anxiety"
2933:
2376:
2258:
980:
555:
3345:
150:
which have existed since ancient times. Early writing on film sought to argue that films could also be considered a form of art. In 1911,
1999:
941:
480:
votes are then converted into an overall rating and ranking for any particular film. Some of these community driven review sites include
3135:
903:
801:
Movies that represent women well are just as likely to be profitable as movies that do not, and are less risky as business propositions.
3508:
3225:
913:
551:
2682:
1071:
908:
463:, an international professional association of Internet-based cinema reviewers, consists of writers from all over the world, while
1111:"The online place of popular music: Exploring the impact of geography and social media on pop artists' mainstream media attention"
763:
certain films for women, presumably because they worry that they'll be dismissed, critically speaking, if they praise a film like
3393:
547:
380:
3479:
3107:
3090:
1655:
3325:
2721:
2908:
3290:
3082:
2957:
1308:
996:
812:
464:
2223:
460:
91:, who study the composition of film theory and publish their findings and essays in books and journals, and general
3728:
3691:
3639:
3444:
3315:
2763:
678:
However, in recent years, there has been a growing belief in the film industry that critic aggregators (especially
1332:
Forslund, Bengt (2012). "Bengt
Idestam-Almquist". Swedish Film Database (in Swedish). Retrieved 10 September 2020.
235:
of the film before discussing its merits or flaws. The verdict is often summarized using a rating system, such as
3878:
3843:
3793:
3738:
3252:
424:
329:
65:
3813:
3676:
3335:
3210:
2454:
1872:
1011:
3918:
3454:
3423:
3360:
3215:
3128:
241:
3708:
3686:
3596:
3545:
3398:
3330:
3310:
3280:
3230:
3220:
2687:
750:
744:
543:
497:
160:
156:
87:
and the film medium. In general, film criticism can be divided into two categories: Academic criticism by
31:
3060:
3871:
3701:
3632:
3587:
3570:
3368:
3242:
1908:
Porton, Richard; Kenigsberg, Ben; Klinger, Gabe; Koresky, Michael; Reardon, Kiva; Tracy, Andrew (2013).
2165:
579:
Psychoanalysis, that breaks down the unconscious that one can experience while observing a given film.
3713:
3577:
3418:
3373:
3340:
3320:
3285:
3275:
3270:
3235:
3027:
1221:"The Creation and Operation Strategy of Disney's Mulan: Cultural Appropriation and Cultural Discount"
898:
612:
607:
232:
2563:"How Critical Are Critical Reviews? The Box Office Effects of Film Critics, Star Power, and Budgets"
3723:
3671:
3350:
3300:
3295:
3265:
3260:
3065:
781:, this leads to skewed, imbalanced review results as 70 per cent of reviewers on the site are men.
559:
3681:
3560:
3439:
3388:
3158:
3121:
3095:
2858:
2850:
2788:
2637:
2598:
2590:
2534:
2482:
2426:
2347:
2308:
2204:
2196:
2147:
2139:
2089:
2081:
1973:"Did Audiences Enjoy 'Star Wars: The Last Jedi'? Deciphering Online User Reviews From Exit Polls"
1929:
1829:
1779:
1771:
1719:
1636:
1588:
1498:
1453:
1411:
1359:
1150:
1089:
1042:
990:
353:
285:
569:
Formalism, that analyzes the way that things are done and the appearance of their form or shape.
3783:
3582:
3449:
3383:
3378:
3305:
3173:
3103:
3086:
2842:
2741:
2629:
2582:
2526:
2474:
2418:
2382:
2372:
2264:
2254:
2131:
2073:
2023:
1921:
1821:
1763:
1711:
1663:
1628:
1580:
1445:
1403:
1351:
1242:
1201:
1142:
1077:
1067:
1034:
976:
949:
885:
830:
785:
644:
625:
1847:
3864:
3803:
3778:
3755:
3565:
3205:
2978:
2834:
2733:
2574:
2518:
2466:
2339:
2300:
2188:
2123:
2065:
1813:
1755:
1703:
1572:
1274:
1232:
1191:
1181:
1132:
1122:
1026:
893:
773:
683:
617:
512:
151:
3002:
1801:
3613:
3550:
2882:
713:
687:
679:
603:
501:
416:
228:
108:
1030:
3829:
3822:
3773:
3718:
3531:
3189:
649:
621:
599:
361:
321:
53:
1196:
686:
claiming that younger viewers give the website more credibility than the major studio
3912:
3788:
3750:
3733:
3592:
3163:
2862:
2208:
1783:
1046:
818:
337:
289:
261:
200:
188:
2602:
2093:
1833:
1154:
3798:
3655:
3070:
2952:
2151:
2054:"Are Consumers More Likely to Contribute Online Reviews for Hit or Niche Products?"
1312:
824:
795:
Critics are slightly more likely to rate a film highly if it represents women well.
748:, discussed the possible effects of this on the critical response to the 2015 film
735:
731:
726:
652:'s philosophy involves movies being connected to the real world, which is reality.
532:
305:
297:
277:
192:
88:
57:
1127:
1110:
378:
popularised the practice of reviewing films via a television program, in the show
1268:
1186:
1169:
3898:
3663:
2578:
871:
528:
375:
371:
345:
269:
236:
196:
70:
3100:
Movie Wars: How
Hollywood and the Media Conspire to Limit What Films We Can See
2069:
1707:
3484:
2838:
2112:"Dynamic Effects among Movie Ratings, Movie Revenues, and Viewer Satisfaction"
861:
505:
493:
481:
420:
249:
184:
143:
92:
74:
17:
2846:
2745:
2633:
2586:
2530:
2478:
2422:
2386:
2268:
2135:
2077:
1925:
1825:
1817:
1767:
1715:
1667:
1632:
1584:
1471:
1449:
1407:
1355:
1278:
1246:
1205:
1146:
1038:
3144:
2737:
1295:, Preface by Jean-Louis Leutrat, Fasano-Paris, Schena-Didier Érudition, 1999
1270:
Everyone's a Critic: Film Criticism Through History and Into the Digital Age
1081:
508:
aggregate both scores from accredited critics and those submitted by users.
489:
220:
99:
95:
798:
Mainstream moviegoers are not turned off by films with female protagonists.
2522:
2366:
2248:
2192:
2127:
3474:
1061:
1012:"Features of interaction of factors of social and communication activity"
485:
453:
224:
147:
103:
2641:
2617:
2594:
2562:
2538:
2506:
2430:
2406:
2200:
2143:
2111:
2085:
2053:
1947:
1933:
1909:
1775:
1743:
1723:
1691:
1640:
1616:
1457:
1437:
1415:
1391:
1363:
1343:
2854:
2822:
2486:
2312:
1759:
1592:
1560:
1237:
1220:
445:
436:
2351:
2327:
2288:
2052:
DELLAROCAS, CHRYSANTHOS; GAO, GUODONG (GORDON); NARAYAN, RITU (2010).
1137:
850:
As of 2021, movie critics earned a yearly average salary of $ 63,474.
3489:
2878:"The Intern has been panned by film critics. Why am I not surprised?"
216:
171:
2470:
2304:
1576:
767:
as though they're only reviewing it favorably because they're women.
2657:"Rotten Tomatoes, Netflix And A Perfect Storm That Dooms Hollywood"
2343:
1880:
239:, academic-style grades, and pictograms (such as those used by the
139:
64:
39:
3500:
2789:"Male film critics greatly outnumber female critics, study finds"
778:
84:
3628:
3624:
3504:
3117:
2561:
Basuroy, Suman; Chatterjee, Subimal; Ravid, S. Abraham (2003).
1063:
It's only a movie! : films and critics in American culture
47:
Quentin Tarantino's unrealized projects § The Movie Critic
3057:
The Rhapsodes: How 1940s Critics Changed American Film Culture
1273:(Senior honors thesis). The College at Brockport. p. 32.
975:. 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017: Routledge. p. 1.
718:
3113:
2000:"You should ignore film ratings on IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes"
1499:"Research Guides: Film & Media: Reviews & Criticism"
1309:"How the Internet Led to the Decline of Female Film Critics"
920:
For the Love of Movies: The Story of American Film Criticism
628:. Godard, Truffaut and Eisenstein were also film directors.
539:
and repetitions, and details about the legacy of the film.
45:"Movie critic" redirects here. For the cancelled film, see
2823:"The Woman Film Critic: Newspapers, Cinema and Iris Barry"
2764:"The Curious Case of the Missing Women in Film Criticism"
717:, and 70 per cent of reviewers for radio formats such as
3079:
It's Only a Movie!: Film and Critics in American Culture
2253:. Chichester, West Sussex; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
2110:
Moon, Sangkil; Bergey, Paul K.; Iacobucci, Dawn (2010).
1392:"Search for Cinema: Film Criticism in the '30s and '40s"
816:, argued that "Previously engaging review sites such as
711:
per cent of critics for general interest magazines like
2683:"How Hollywood Came to Fear and Loathe Rotten Tomatoes"
2511:
Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment
2250:
An introduction to criticism: literature, film, culture
467:
members handle reviews in the New York tri-state area.
138:
Film is a relatively new form of art, in comparison to
1617:"The Role of Media Critics in the Cultural Industries"
1219:
Chen, Rui; Chen, Zhiyi; Yang, Yongzhong (2021-03-04).
942:"Reviews vs Criticism - Film & Television Studies"
1654:
Beam, Christopher; Singer-Vine, Jeremy (2011-06-06).
1744:"What Is Being Fought For by Today's Cinephilia(s)?"
30:"Film review" redirects here. For the magazine, see
3812:
3766:
3662:
3606:
3538:
3467:
3432:
3407:
3359:
3251:
3198:
3182:
3151:
946:
The University of Vermont Libraries Research Guides
562:, as well as many other colleges across the world.
3837:Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television
2368:Film theory and criticism: introductory readings
1109:Verboord, Marc; Noord, Sharon van (2016-04-02).
388:Format for film critics to write film criticisms
1170:"Beyond Tautology? Audio-Visual Film Criticism"
2934:"Where Are the Women? : Data Spreadsheet"
1994:
1992:
1696:Academy of Management Learning & Education
3640:
3516:
3129:
3059:, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2016,
2909:"Where Are the Women?: crunching the numbers"
1442:International Labor and Working-Class History
1348:International Labor and Working-Class History
792:22% of 2015's movies had female protagonists.
129:The Optical Lantern and Cinematograph Journal
8:
3022:
3020:
3018:
1692:"A Resource Review for Diversity Film Media"
971:Clayton, Alex; Klevan, Andrew, eds. (2011).
754:, which received mixed reviews from critics:
3068:to young, aspiring, would-be film critics (
2902:
2900:
2332:The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism
1873:"New York Film Critics Online - Who We Are"
1303:
1301:
598:Some notable academic film critics include
3647:
3633:
3625:
3523:
3509:
3501:
3429:
3136:
3122:
3114:
1848:"Our Bylaws – Online Film Critics Society"
1748:Framework: The Journal of Cinema and Media
1396:Journal of the University Film Association
1094:: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (
3858:New Review of Film and Television Studies
2328:"Structuralism, Language, and Literature"
2058:Journal of Management Information Systems
1236:
1195:
1185:
1136:
1126:
248:Some well-known journalistic critics are
3851:Journal of Popular Film & Television
1621:International Journal of Arts Management
1281:– via SUNY Open Access Repository.
1010:Mitchuk, Olha; Haidur, Nataliia (2021).
973:The Language and Style of Film Criticism
3028:"How Much Money Do Movie Critics Make?"
1554:
1552:
1550:
1548:
1546:
1544:
1542:
1540:
1538:
1438:"American Movie Audiences of the 1930s"
1344:"American Movie Audiences of the 1930s"
1293:Ricciotto Canudo ou le cinéma comme art
933:
2816:
2814:
2812:
2810:
2808:
2715:
2713:
2711:
2709:
2707:
2705:
2556:
2554:
2552:
2550:
2548:
2507:"Green Film Criticism and Its Futures"
2500:
2498:
2496:
2448:
2446:
2444:
2442:
2440:
2282:
2280:
2278:
1536:
1534:
1532:
1530:
1528:
1526:
1524:
1522:
1520:
1518:
1431:
1429:
1427:
1425:
1385:
1383:
1381:
1379:
1377:
1375:
1373:
1087:
988:
448:in fiction films. One such example is
2757:
2755:
2722:"The Rise and Fall of Film Criticism"
2720:Nowell-Smith, Geoffrey (2008-09-01).
2400:
2398:
2396:
2371:. New York: Oxford University Press.
2365:Braudy, Leo; Cohen, Marshall (2009).
2222:Svetkey, Benjamin, ed. (2018-08-16).
2105:
2103:
2047:
2045:
2043:
1910:"Film Criticism: The Next Generation"
1903:
1901:
1899:
1897:
1795:
1793:
1737:
1735:
1733:
1685:
1683:
1610:
1608:
1606:
1604:
1602:
1561:"Towards an Objective Film Criticism"
1476:At the Movies with Margaret and David
690:, which undercuts its effectiveness.
556:University of California, Los Angeles
7:
1971:D'Alessandro, Anthony (2017-12-17).
1262:
1260:
1258:
1256:
595:evaluate when engaging in critique.
904:List of film journals and magazines
2876:Clem Bastow (September 30, 2015).
2618:"FILM: The Power of Movie Critics"
2224:"The Top 25 American Film Schools"
1656:"Slate's Hollywood Career-O-Matic"
948:. October 15, 2017. Archived from
914:List of films considered the worst
552:University of California, Berkeley
83:is the analysis and evaluation of
25:
2655:Mendelson, Scott (13 June 2017).
1800:Verboord, Marc (September 2014).
1168:Grant, Catherine (January 2016).
909:List of films considered the best
546:. Some of these colleges include
397:Film critics and audience members
3892:
2932:Johanson, MaryAnn (April 2016).
2907:Johanson, MaryAnn (2016-04-11).
878:
864:
836:The World Social Justice Website
450:Insultingly Stupid Movie Physics
381:Siskel & Ebert At the Movies
165:father of Swedish film criticism
98:that appears regularly in press
27:Analysis and evaluation of films
2453:Henderson, Brian (1971-04-01).
2326:Ames, Sanford Scribner (1973).
2289:"Formalism and Its Discontents"
1031:10.21272/Obraz.2021.3(37)-17-26
742:Clem Bastow, culture writer at
548:University of California, Davis
484:, Reviewer, Movie Attractions,
3480:Appraisal (discourse analysis)
2287:Feldman, Edmund Burke (1992).
1615:Debenedetti, Stéphane (2006).
1:
3003:"Pay Scale for Movie Critics"
2979:"Pay Scale for Movie Critics"
1267:Battaglia, James (May 2010).
1128:10.1080/15405702.2015.1019073
1060:Haberski, Raymond J. (2001).
3083:University Press of Kentucky
2951:Harris, James (2022-10-17).
2762:Adams, Thelma (2015-12-29).
1187:10.3998/fc.13761232.0040.113
465:New York Film Critics Online
3066:Peter Bradshaw gives advice
2787:Devan Coggan (2016-06-23).
2579:10.1509/jmkg.67.4.103.18692
2024:"Top 10 Movies of All Time"
461:Online Film Critics Society
34:. For the similar-sounding
3935:
3879:Television & New Media
3729:Psychoanalytic film theory
3102:, A Cappella Books, 2000.
2681:Lee, Chris (9 June 2017).
2455:"Two Types of Film Theory"
2070:10.2753/MIS0742-1222270204
1708:10.5465/amle.2008.37029279
1690:Tejeda, Manuel J. (2008).
1197:2027/spo.13761232.0040.113
810:James Harris, writing for
51:
44:
29:
3888:
3844:Journal of Film and Video
3739:Structuralist film theory
3077:Haberski, Raymond J. Jr.
2953:"Criticising the critics"
2839:10.2979/FIL.2006.18.2.154
1503:guides.library.queensu.ca
923:, a 2009 documentary film
758:The critical response to
425:Movie Review Query Engine
2616:FARBER, STEPHEN (1976).
2505:Ivakhiv, Adrian (2008).
2405:Hantke, Steffen (2007).
2293:Studies in Art Education
2028:www.alltopeverything.com
1948:"Rotten Tomatoes: About"
1818:10.1177/1461444813495164
1436:Butsch, Richard (2001).
1342:Butsch, Richard (2001).
995:: CS1 maint: location (
665:Issues and controversies
634:The American Horror Film
52:Not to be confused with
40:Revue § Film revues
3424:Criticism of technology
2821:Wasson, Haidee (2006).
2738:10.1525/fq.2008.62.1.10
1806:New Media & Society
1742:Shambu, Girish (2009).
1390:Lentz, Tony M. (1973).
523:Academic film criticism
242:San Francisco Chronicle
3687:Linguistic film theory
3546:Architecture criticism
2247:Ryan, Michael (2012).
2228:The Hollywood Reporter
2166:"Faculty publications"
1952:www.rottentomatoes.com
769:
745:The Guardian Australia
475:User-submitted reviews
211:Journalistic criticism
161:Swedish Film Institute
157:Bengt Idestam-Almquist
77:
73:(right) with director
32:Film Review (magazine)
3872:The Velvet Light Trap
3702:Formalist film theory
3677:Cognitive film theory
3588:Video game journalism
3571:Rockism and poptimism
3226:Intellectual property
2193:10.1353/lit.2007.0045
2128:10.1509/jmkg.74.1.108
1115:Popular Communication
756:
706:Female representation
406:Online film criticism
68:
3714:Feminist film theory
3593:Visual art criticism
3578:Television criticism
3419:Criticism of science
3408:Science, technology,
2622:The American Scholar
2567:Journal of Marketing
2116:Journal of Marketing
1559:Jarvie, Ian (1961).
899:List of film critics
656:Green film criticism
527:More often known as
350:Good Morning America
195:, and more recently
3724:Marxist film theory
3346:Walt Disney Company
3096:Rosenbaum, Jonathan
2913:FlickFilosopher.com
2523:10.1093/isle/15.2.1
1497:Gibson, Elizabeth.
560:Stanford University
498:Everyone's a Critic
431:Online film critics
237:5- or 4-star scales
3682:Historical poetics
3561:Literary criticism
3159:Literary criticism
2411:College Literature
2181:College Literature
1760:10.1353/frm.0.0038
1238:10.3390/su13052751
952:on October 6, 2017
354:Jonathan Rosenbaum
286:James Berardinelli
266:The New York Times
131:, followed by the
78:
3906:
3905:
3814:Academic journals
3784:Sergei Eisenstein
3622:
3621:
3583:Theatre criticism
3498:
3497:
3463:
3462:
3410:engineering, and
3174:Theatre criticism
2378:978-0-19-536562-7
2260:978-1-4051-8283-6
1291:Giovanni Dotoli,
1279:20.500.12648/6777
1066:. Lexington, Ky.
982:978-0-203-81731-5
886:Journalism portal
831:The Onion AV Club
786:Johanson analysis
771:Matt Reynolds of
626:Sergei Eisenstein
613:Cahiers du Cinéma
610:(all writers for
608:François Truffaut
444:the depiction of
415:Websites such as
342:The Village Voice
274:Chicago Sun-Times
16:(Redirected from
3926:
3897:
3896:
3895:
3804:Kristin Thompson
3779:Thomas Elsaesser
3756:Schreiber theory
3746:Critical methods
3649:
3642:
3635:
3626:
3566:Music journalism
3525:
3518:
3511:
3502:
3468:Similar concepts
3430:
3326:Paramount Global
3206:Social criticism
3138:
3131:
3124:
3115:
3055:Bordwell, Davd:
3042:
3041:
3039:
3038:
3024:
3013:
3012:
3010:
3009:
2999:
2993:
2992:
2990:
2989:
2983:Work - Chron.com
2975:
2969:
2968:
2966:
2965:
2948:
2942:
2941:
2929:
2923:
2922:
2920:
2919:
2904:
2895:
2894:
2892:
2890:
2873:
2867:
2866:
2818:
2803:
2802:
2800:
2799:
2784:
2778:
2777:
2775:
2774:
2759:
2750:
2749:
2717:
2700:
2699:
2697:
2695:
2678:
2672:
2671:
2669:
2667:
2652:
2646:
2645:
2613:
2607:
2606:
2558:
2543:
2542:
2502:
2491:
2490:
2450:
2435:
2434:
2402:
2391:
2390:
2362:
2356:
2355:
2323:
2317:
2316:
2284:
2273:
2272:
2244:
2238:
2237:
2235:
2234:
2219:
2213:
2212:
2176:
2170:
2169:
2162:
2156:
2155:
2107:
2098:
2097:
2049:
2038:
2037:
2035:
2034:
2020:
2014:
2013:
2011:
2010:
1996:
1987:
1986:
1984:
1983:
1968:
1962:
1961:
1959:
1958:
1944:
1938:
1937:
1905:
1892:
1891:
1889:
1888:
1879:. Archived from
1869:
1863:
1862:
1860:
1859:
1844:
1838:
1837:
1797:
1788:
1787:
1754:(1/2): 218–220.
1739:
1728:
1727:
1687:
1678:
1677:
1675:
1674:
1651:
1645:
1644:
1612:
1597:
1596:
1556:
1513:
1512:
1510:
1509:
1494:
1488:
1487:
1485:
1483:
1468:
1462:
1461:
1433:
1420:
1419:
1387:
1368:
1367:
1339:
1333:
1330:
1324:
1323:
1321:
1320:
1305:
1296:
1289:
1283:
1282:
1264:
1251:
1250:
1240:
1216:
1210:
1209:
1199:
1189:
1165:
1159:
1158:
1140:
1130:
1106:
1100:
1099:
1093:
1085:
1057:
1051:
1050:
1021:(in Ukrainian).
1016:
1007:
1001:
1000:
994:
986:
968:
962:
961:
959:
957:
938:
894:Prestige picture
888:
883:
882:
881:
874:
869:
868:
867:
834:have all become
684:20th Century Fox
618:Kristin Thompson
513:open access poll
366:What The Flick?!
330:Michael Phillips
310:The New Republic
152:Ricciotto Canudo
21:
3934:
3933:
3929:
3928:
3927:
3925:
3924:
3923:
3909:
3908:
3907:
3902:
3899:Film portal
3893:
3891:
3884:
3808:
3762:
3658:
3653:
3623:
3618:
3614:Arts journalism
3602:
3551:Dance criticism
3534:
3529:
3499:
3494:
3459:
3428:
3411:
3409:
3403:
3394:Washington Post
3355:
3291:Electronic Arts
3247:
3194:
3178:
3147:
3142:
3112:
3051:
3049:Further reading
3046:
3045:
3036:
3034:
3026:
3025:
3016:
3007:
3005:
3001:
3000:
2996:
2987:
2985:
2977:
2976:
2972:
2963:
2961:
2950:
2949:
2945:
2931:
2930:
2926:
2917:
2915:
2906:
2905:
2898:
2888:
2886:
2883:theguardian.com
2875:
2874:
2870:
2820:
2819:
2806:
2797:
2795:
2786:
2785:
2781:
2772:
2770:
2761:
2760:
2753:
2719:
2718:
2703:
2693:
2691:
2680:
2679:
2675:
2665:
2663:
2654:
2653:
2649:
2615:
2614:
2610:
2560:
2559:
2546:
2504:
2503:
2494:
2471:10.2307/1210090
2452:
2451:
2438:
2404:
2403:
2394:
2379:
2364:
2363:
2359:
2325:
2324:
2320:
2305:10.2307/1320360
2286:
2285:
2276:
2261:
2246:
2245:
2241:
2232:
2230:
2221:
2220:
2216:
2178:
2177:
2173:
2164:
2163:
2159:
2109:
2108:
2101:
2051:
2050:
2041:
2032:
2030:
2022:
2021:
2017:
2008:
2006:
1998:
1997:
1990:
1981:
1979:
1970:
1969:
1965:
1956:
1954:
1946:
1945:
1941:
1907:
1906:
1895:
1886:
1884:
1871:
1870:
1866:
1857:
1855:
1846:
1845:
1841:
1799:
1798:
1791:
1741:
1740:
1731:
1689:
1688:
1681:
1672:
1670:
1653:
1652:
1648:
1614:
1613:
1600:
1577:10.2307/1210064
1558:
1557:
1516:
1507:
1505:
1496:
1495:
1491:
1481:
1479:
1470:
1469:
1465:
1444:(59): 106–120.
1435:
1434:
1423:
1389:
1388:
1371:
1350:(59): 106–120.
1341:
1340:
1336:
1331:
1327:
1318:
1316:
1307:
1306:
1299:
1290:
1286:
1266:
1265:
1254:
1218:
1217:
1213:
1167:
1166:
1162:
1108:
1107:
1103:
1086:
1074:
1059:
1058:
1054:
1014:
1009:
1008:
1004:
987:
983:
970:
969:
965:
955:
953:
940:
939:
935:
930:
884:
879:
877:
870:
865:
863:
860:
848:
808:
708:
699:
680:Rotten Tomatoes
672:
667:
658:
638:Projected Fears
604:Jean-Luc Godard
525:
502:Rotten Tomatoes
477:
433:
417:Rotten Tomatoes
413:
408:
399:
390:
334:Chicago Tribune
229:broadcast media
213:
163:has called the
125:
69:Chicago critic
61:
50:
43:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
3932:
3930:
3922:
3921:
3919:Film criticism
3911:
3910:
3904:
3903:
3889:
3886:
3885:
3883:
3882:
3875:
3868:
3861:
3854:
3847:
3840:
3833:
3830:Film Quarterly
3826:
3823:Cinema Journal
3818:
3816:
3810:
3809:
3807:
3806:
3801:
3796:
3794:Christian Metz
3791:
3786:
3781:
3776:
3774:David Bordwell
3770:
3768:
3764:
3763:
3761:
3760:
3759:
3758:
3753:
3743:
3742:
3741:
3736:
3731:
3726:
3721:
3719:Film semiotics
3716:
3706:
3705:
3704:
3696:
3695:
3694:
3689:
3684:
3679:
3668:
3666:
3660:
3659:
3654:
3652:
3651:
3644:
3637:
3629:
3620:
3619:
3617:
3616:
3610:
3608:
3604:
3603:
3601:
3600:
3590:
3585:
3580:
3575:
3574:
3573:
3563:
3558:
3556:Film criticism
3553:
3548:
3542:
3540:
3536:
3535:
3532:Arts criticism
3530:
3528:
3527:
3520:
3513:
3505:
3496:
3495:
3493:
3492:
3487:
3482:
3477:
3471:
3469:
3465:
3464:
3461:
3460:
3458:
3457:
3452:
3447:
3442:
3436:
3434:
3427:
3426:
3421:
3415:
3413:
3405:
3404:
3402:
3401:
3396:
3391:
3386:
3381:
3376:
3371:
3365:
3363:
3357:
3356:
3354:
3353:
3348:
3343:
3338:
3333:
3328:
3323:
3318:
3313:
3308:
3303:
3298:
3293:
3288:
3283:
3278:
3273:
3268:
3263:
3257:
3255:
3249:
3248:
3246:
3245:
3240:
3239:
3238:
3233:
3223:
3218:
3213:
3208:
3202:
3200:
3199:Social systems
3196:
3195:
3193:
3192:
3190:Self-criticism
3186:
3184:
3183:Human behavior
3180:
3179:
3177:
3176:
3171:
3169:Film criticism
3166:
3161:
3155:
3153:
3149:
3148:
3143:
3141:
3140:
3133:
3126:
3118:
3111:
3110:
3093:
3075:
3074:, 8 July 2008)
3063:
3052:
3050:
3047:
3044:
3043:
3014:
2994:
2970:
2943:
2924:
2896:
2868:
2833:(2): 154–162.
2804:
2779:
2751:
2726:Film Quarterly
2701:
2673:
2647:
2628:(3): 419–423.
2608:
2573:(4): 103–117.
2544:
2492:
2459:Film Quarterly
2436:
2417:(4): 191–202.
2392:
2377:
2357:
2344:10.2307/428706
2318:
2299:(2): 122–126.
2274:
2259:
2239:
2214:
2187:(4): 191–202.
2171:
2157:
2122:(1): 108–121.
2099:
2064:(2): 127–157.
2039:
2015:
1988:
1963:
1939:
1893:
1864:
1839:
1812:(6): 921–940.
1789:
1729:
1702:(3): 434–439.
1679:
1646:
1598:
1565:Film Quarterly
1514:
1489:
1463:
1421:
1369:
1334:
1325:
1297:
1284:
1252:
1225:Sustainability
1211:
1174:Film Criticism
1160:
1101:
1072:
1052:
1002:
981:
963:
932:
931:
929:
926:
925:
924:
916:
911:
906:
901:
896:
890:
889:
875:
859:
856:
847:
844:
807:
804:
803:
802:
799:
796:
793:
784:A study using
707:
704:
698:
695:
671:
668:
666:
663:
657:
654:
622:David Bordwell
584:
583:
580:
577:
573:
570:
524:
521:
476:
473:
432:
429:
412:
409:
407:
404:
398:
395:
389:
386:
362:Christy Lemire
358:Chicago Reader
322:Peter Bradshaw
302:The New Yorker
212:
209:
170:By the 1920s,
124:
121:
81:Film criticism
54:cinematography
26:
24:
18:Movie reviewer
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3931:
3920:
3917:
3916:
3914:
3901:
3900:
3887:
3881:
3880:
3876:
3874:
3873:
3869:
3867:
3866:
3862:
3860:
3859:
3855:
3853:
3852:
3848:
3846:
3845:
3841:
3839:
3838:
3834:
3832:
3831:
3827:
3825:
3824:
3820:
3819:
3817:
3815:
3811:
3805:
3802:
3800:
3797:
3795:
3792:
3790:
3789:Colin MacCabe
3787:
3785:
3782:
3780:
3777:
3775:
3772:
3771:
3769:
3765:
3757:
3754:
3752:
3751:Auteur theory
3749:
3748:
3747:
3744:
3740:
3737:
3735:
3734:Screen theory
3732:
3730:
3727:
3725:
3722:
3720:
3717:
3715:
3712:
3711:
3710:
3707:
3703:
3700:
3699:
3697:
3693:
3690:
3688:
3685:
3683:
3680:
3678:
3675:
3674:
3673:
3670:
3669:
3667:
3665:
3661:
3657:
3650:
3645:
3643:
3638:
3636:
3631:
3630:
3627:
3615:
3612:
3611:
3609:
3605:
3598:
3594:
3591:
3589:
3586:
3584:
3581:
3579:
3576:
3572:
3569:
3568:
3567:
3564:
3562:
3559:
3557:
3554:
3552:
3549:
3547:
3544:
3543:
3541:
3537:
3533:
3526:
3521:
3519:
3514:
3512:
3507:
3506:
3503:
3491:
3488:
3486:
3483:
3481:
3478:
3476:
3473:
3472:
3470:
3466:
3456:
3453:
3451:
3448:
3446:
3445:Desktop Linux
3443:
3441:
3438:
3437:
3435:
3431:
3425:
3422:
3420:
3417:
3416:
3414:
3406:
3400:
3397:
3395:
3392:
3390:
3387:
3385:
3382:
3380:
3377:
3375:
3372:
3370:
3367:
3366:
3364:
3362:
3358:
3352:
3349:
3347:
3344:
3342:
3339:
3337:
3334:
3332:
3329:
3327:
3324:
3322:
3319:
3317:
3314:
3312:
3309:
3307:
3304:
3302:
3299:
3297:
3294:
3292:
3289:
3287:
3284:
3282:
3279:
3277:
3274:
3272:
3269:
3267:
3264:
3262:
3259:
3258:
3256:
3254:
3250:
3244:
3241:
3237:
3234:
3232:
3229:
3228:
3227:
3224:
3222:
3219:
3217:
3214:
3212:
3209:
3207:
3204:
3203:
3201:
3197:
3191:
3188:
3187:
3185:
3181:
3175:
3172:
3170:
3167:
3165:
3164:Art criticism
3162:
3160:
3157:
3156:
3154:
3150:
3146:
3139:
3134:
3132:
3127:
3125:
3120:
3119:
3116:
3109:
3105:
3101:
3097:
3094:
3092:
3088:
3084:
3080:
3076:
3073:
3072:
3067:
3064:
3062:
3058:
3054:
3053:
3048:
3033:
3029:
3023:
3021:
3019:
3015:
3004:
2998:
2995:
2984:
2980:
2974:
2971:
2960:
2959:
2954:
2947:
2944:
2939:
2935:
2928:
2925:
2914:
2910:
2903:
2901:
2897:
2885:
2884:
2879:
2872:
2869:
2864:
2860:
2856:
2852:
2848:
2844:
2840:
2836:
2832:
2828:
2824:
2817:
2815:
2813:
2811:
2809:
2805:
2794:
2790:
2783:
2780:
2769:
2765:
2758:
2756:
2752:
2747:
2743:
2739:
2735:
2731:
2727:
2723:
2716:
2714:
2712:
2710:
2708:
2706:
2702:
2690:
2689:
2684:
2677:
2674:
2662:
2658:
2651:
2648:
2643:
2639:
2635:
2631:
2627:
2623:
2619:
2612:
2609:
2604:
2600:
2596:
2592:
2588:
2584:
2580:
2576:
2572:
2568:
2564:
2557:
2555:
2553:
2551:
2549:
2545:
2540:
2536:
2532:
2528:
2524:
2520:
2516:
2512:
2508:
2501:
2499:
2497:
2493:
2488:
2484:
2480:
2476:
2472:
2468:
2464:
2460:
2456:
2449:
2447:
2445:
2443:
2441:
2437:
2432:
2428:
2424:
2420:
2416:
2412:
2408:
2401:
2399:
2397:
2393:
2388:
2384:
2380:
2374:
2370:
2369:
2361:
2358:
2353:
2349:
2345:
2341:
2337:
2333:
2329:
2322:
2319:
2314:
2310:
2306:
2302:
2298:
2294:
2290:
2283:
2281:
2279:
2275:
2270:
2266:
2262:
2256:
2252:
2251:
2243:
2240:
2229:
2225:
2218:
2215:
2210:
2206:
2202:
2198:
2194:
2190:
2186:
2182:
2175:
2172:
2167:
2161:
2158:
2153:
2149:
2145:
2141:
2137:
2133:
2129:
2125:
2121:
2117:
2113:
2106:
2104:
2100:
2095:
2091:
2087:
2083:
2079:
2075:
2071:
2067:
2063:
2059:
2055:
2048:
2046:
2044:
2040:
2029:
2025:
2019:
2016:
2005:
2001:
1995:
1993:
1989:
1978:
1974:
1967:
1964:
1953:
1949:
1943:
1940:
1935:
1931:
1927:
1923:
1919:
1915:
1911:
1904:
1902:
1900:
1898:
1894:
1883:on 2015-12-05
1882:
1878:
1877:www.nyfco.net
1874:
1868:
1865:
1854:. 28 May 2012
1853:
1849:
1843:
1840:
1835:
1831:
1827:
1823:
1819:
1815:
1811:
1807:
1803:
1796:
1794:
1790:
1785:
1781:
1777:
1773:
1769:
1765:
1761:
1757:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1738:
1736:
1734:
1730:
1725:
1721:
1717:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1701:
1697:
1693:
1686:
1684:
1680:
1669:
1665:
1661:
1657:
1650:
1647:
1642:
1638:
1634:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1618:
1611:
1609:
1607:
1605:
1603:
1599:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1555:
1553:
1551:
1549:
1547:
1545:
1543:
1541:
1539:
1537:
1535:
1533:
1531:
1529:
1527:
1525:
1523:
1521:
1519:
1515:
1504:
1500:
1493:
1490:
1477:
1473:
1472:"The Classic"
1467:
1464:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1432:
1430:
1428:
1426:
1422:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1386:
1384:
1382:
1380:
1378:
1376:
1374:
1370:
1365:
1361:
1357:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1338:
1335:
1329:
1326:
1314:
1310:
1304:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1288:
1285:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1271:
1263:
1261:
1259:
1257:
1253:
1248:
1244:
1239:
1234:
1230:
1226:
1222:
1215:
1212:
1207:
1203:
1198:
1193:
1188:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1164:
1161:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1139:
1134:
1129:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1105:
1102:
1097:
1091:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1073:0-8131-2193-0
1069:
1065:
1064:
1056:
1053:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1013:
1006:
1003:
998:
992:
984:
978:
974:
967:
964:
951:
947:
943:
937:
934:
927:
922:
921:
917:
915:
912:
910:
907:
905:
902:
900:
897:
895:
892:
891:
887:
876:
873:
862:
857:
855:
851:
845:
843:
841:
837:
833:
832:
827:
826:
821:
820:
815:
814:
805:
800:
797:
794:
791:
790:
789:
787:
782:
780:
776:
775:
768:
766:
761:
755:
753:
752:
747:
746:
740:
737:
733:
729:
728:
722:
720:
716:
715:
705:
703:
697:Controversies
696:
694:
691:
689:
685:
681:
676:
669:
664:
662:
655:
653:
651:
646:
641:
639:
635:
629:
627:
623:
619:
615:
614:
609:
605:
601:
596:
592:
588:
581:
578:
574:
571:
568:
567:
566:
563:
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
540:
536:
534:
530:
522:
520:
516:
514:
509:
507:
503:
499:
495:
491:
487:
483:
474:
472:
468:
466:
462:
457:
455:
451:
447:
441:
438:
430:
428:
426:
422:
418:
410:
405:
403:
396:
394:
387:
385:
383:
382:
377:
373:
369:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
338:Andrew Sarris
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
290:Philip French
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
262:Vincent Canby
259:
255:
251:
246:
244:
243:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
210:
208:
204:
202:
201:Peter Travers
198:
194:
190:
189:Andrew Sarris
186:
180:
176:
173:
168:
166:
162:
158:
153:
149:
145:
141:
136:
134:
130:
122:
120:
116:
112:
110:
105:
101:
97:
94:
90:
89:film scholars
86:
82:
76:
72:
67:
63:
59:
55:
48:
41:
37:
33:
19:
3890:
3877:
3870:
3863:
3856:
3849:
3842:
3835:
3828:
3821:
3799:Laura Mulvey
3745:
3692:Neoformalism
3656:Film studies
3555:
3253:Corporations
3168:
3099:
3078:
3071:The Guardian
3069:
3056:
3035:. Retrieved
3031:
3006:. Retrieved
2997:
2986:. Retrieved
2982:
2973:
2962:. Retrieved
2956:
2946:
2937:
2927:
2916:. Retrieved
2912:
2889:December 15,
2887:. Retrieved
2881:
2871:
2830:
2827:Film History
2826:
2796:. Retrieved
2792:
2782:
2771:. Retrieved
2767:
2732:(1): 10–11.
2729:
2725:
2692:. Retrieved
2686:
2676:
2664:. Retrieved
2660:
2650:
2625:
2621:
2611:
2570:
2566:
2514:
2510:
2465:(3): 33–42.
2462:
2458:
2414:
2410:
2367:
2360:
2338:(1): 89–94.
2335:
2331:
2321:
2296:
2292:
2249:
2242:
2231:. Retrieved
2227:
2217:
2184:
2180:
2174:
2160:
2119:
2115:
2061:
2057:
2031:. Retrieved
2027:
2018:
2007:. Retrieved
2003:
1980:. Retrieved
1976:
1966:
1955:. Retrieved
1951:
1942:
1920:(2): 35–40.
1917:
1913:
1885:. Retrieved
1881:the original
1876:
1867:
1856:. Retrieved
1851:
1842:
1809:
1805:
1751:
1747:
1699:
1695:
1671:. Retrieved
1659:
1649:
1627:(3): 30–42.
1624:
1620:
1571:(3): 19–23.
1568:
1564:
1506:. Retrieved
1502:
1492:
1480:. Retrieved
1478:. ABC.net.au
1475:
1466:
1441:
1402:(4): 69–84.
1399:
1395:
1347:
1337:
1328:
1317:. Retrieved
1315:. 2015-12-27
1313:The Atlantic
1292:
1287:
1269:
1228:
1224:
1214:
1177:
1173:
1163:
1121:(2): 59–72.
1118:
1114:
1104:
1062:
1055:
1025:(3): 17–26.
1022:
1018:
1005:
972:
966:
954:. Retrieved
950:the original
945:
936:
918:
852:
849:
839:
835:
829:
825:The Guardian
823:
817:
811:
809:
783:
772:
770:
764:
759:
757:
749:
743:
741:
736:Pauline Kael
732:Judith Crist
727:The Atlantic
725:
724:Writing for
723:
712:
709:
700:
692:
677:
673:
659:
645:Eisenstein's
642:
637:
633:
630:
611:
597:
593:
589:
585:
564:
541:
537:
533:film studies
526:
517:
510:
478:
469:
458:
449:
442:
434:
414:
400:
391:
379:
370:
365:
357:
349:
341:
333:
326:The Guardian
325:
317:
313:
309:
306:Manny Farber
301:
298:Pauline Kael
294:The Observer
293:
282:The Observer
281:
278:Mark Kermode
273:
265:
257:
253:
247:
240:
219:working for
214:
205:
193:Pauline Kael
181:
177:
169:
164:
137:
132:
128:
126:
117:
113:
111:as a whole.
109:film history
93:journalistic
80:
79:
62:
58:film studies
35:
3709:Continental
3412:mathematics
3336:Tesla, Inc.
3211:Advertising
2938:Google Docs
2688:Vanity Fair
2517:(2): 1–28.
1231:(5): 2751.
956:October 23,
872:Film portal
840:problematic
600:André Bazin
529:film theory
411:Aggregators
376:Gene Siskel
372:Roger Ebert
346:Joel Siegel
270:Roger Ebert
197:Roger Ebert
159:, whom the
71:Roger Ebert
3698:Classical
3664:Approaches
3485:Evaluation
3455:Windows 10
3361:Mass media
3216:Capitalism
3108:1556524544
3091:0813121930
3037:2018-05-02
3008:2018-05-02
2988:2021-11-03
2964:2023-06-25
2958:The Critic
2918:2020-07-16
2798:2017-10-25
2773:2017-10-24
2233:2021-11-04
2033:2019-11-30
2009:2019-11-30
1982:2017-12-18
1957:2017-10-25
1887:2017-10-25
1858:2017-10-25
1673:2017-10-25
1508:2022-10-12
1319:2018-06-21
1138:1765/87688
928:References
813:The Critic
765:The Intern
760:The Intern
751:The Intern
506:Metacritic
494:Flickchart
482:Letterboxd
421:Metacritic
318:The Nation
258:The Nation
250:James Agee
221:newspapers
185:James Agee
144:literature
100:newspapers
75:Russ Meyer
36:Film revue
3399:Knowledge
3331:Starbucks
3316:McDonalds
3311:Microsoft
3281:Coca-Cola
3231:Copyright
3221:Democracy
3145:Criticism
3032:Bizfluent
2863:194069701
2847:0892-2160
2746:0015-1386
2634:0003-0937
2587:0022-2429
2531:1076-0962
2479:0015-1386
2423:0093-3139
2387:262430698
2269:752909880
2209:170518242
2136:0022-2429
2078:0742-1222
1926:0009-7004
1826:1461-4448
1784:191336566
1768:0306-7661
1716:1537-260X
1668:1091-2339
1633:1480-8986
1585:0015-1386
1450:0147-5479
1408:0041-9311
1356:0147-5479
1247:2071-1050
1206:2471-4364
1147:1540-5702
1090:cite book
1047:250471376
1039:2415-8496
991:cite book
688:marketing
670:Influence
544:Hollywood
490:FilmCrave
225:magazines
135:in 1908.
104:magazines
96:criticism
3913:Category
3767:Scholars
3672:Analytic
3607:See also
3597:Feminist
3475:Critique
3433:Software
3369:Fox News
3271:AT&T
3243:Religion
3152:The arts
3085:, 2001.
2642:41207394
2603:17913431
2595:30040552
2539:44086718
2431:25115464
2201:25115464
2144:20619083
2094:36573602
2086:29780173
2004:Wired UK
1977:Deadline
1934:43500817
1914:Cinéaste
1852:ofcs.org
1834:34276023
1776:41552556
1724:40214564
1641:41064885
1458:27672712
1416:20687223
1364:27672712
1155:54768350
1082:45230353
858:See also
806:Ideology
486:Flixster
454:Intuitor
148:painting
133:Bioscope
3341:Walmart
3321:Netflix
3286:Comcast
3276:Chevron
3236:Patents
3061:Details
2855:3815632
2768:Variety
2694:14 June
2666:14 June
2487:1210090
2313:1320360
2152:3914043
1593:1210064
446:science
437:YouTube
360:); and
233:premise
217:critics
172:critics
123:History
3865:Screen
3539:Topics
3490:Review
3351:Yahoo!
3301:Huawei
3296:Google
3266:Amazon
3261:Airbnb
3106:
3089:
2861:
2853:
2845:
2793:EW.com
2744:
2661:Forbes
2640:
2632:
2601:
2593:
2585:
2537:
2529:
2485:
2477:
2429:
2421:
2385:
2375:
2352:428706
2350:
2311:
2267:
2257:
2207:
2199:
2150:
2142:
2134:
2092:
2084:
2076:
1932:
1924:
1832:
1824:
1782:
1774:
1766:
1722:
1714:
1666:
1639:
1631:
1591:
1583:
1482:26 May
1456:
1448:
1414:
1406:
1362:
1354:
1245:
1204:
1153:
1145:
1080:
1070:
1045:
1037:
979:
846:Salary
624:, and
280:(BBC,
38:, see
3389:MSNBC
2859:S2CID
2851:JSTOR
2638:JSTOR
2599:S2CID
2591:JSTOR
2535:JSTOR
2483:JSTOR
2427:JSTOR
2348:JSTOR
2309:JSTOR
2205:S2CID
2197:JSTOR
2148:S2CID
2140:JSTOR
2090:S2CID
2082:JSTOR
1930:JSTOR
1830:S2CID
1780:S2CID
1772:JSTOR
1720:JSTOR
1660:Slate
1637:JSTOR
1589:JSTOR
1454:JSTOR
1412:JSTOR
1360:JSTOR
1180:(1).
1151:S2CID
1043:S2CID
1019:Obraz
1015:(PDF)
774:Wired
650:Bazin
576:film.
215:Film
140:music
85:films
3450:Java
3384:ESPN
3379:CNBC
3306:IKEA
3104:ISBN
3087:ISBN
2891:2015
2843:ISSN
2742:ISSN
2696:2017
2668:2017
2630:ISSN
2583:ISSN
2527:ISSN
2475:ISSN
2419:ISSN
2383:OCLC
2373:ISBN
2265:OCLC
2255:ISBN
2132:ISSN
2074:ISSN
1922:ISSN
1822:ISSN
1764:ISSN
1712:ISSN
1664:ISSN
1629:ISSN
1581:ISSN
1484:2014
1446:ISSN
1404:ISSN
1352:ISSN
1243:ISSN
1202:ISSN
1143:ISSN
1096:link
1078:OCLC
1068:ISBN
1035:ISSN
997:link
977:ISBN
958:2017
828:and
779:IMDb
734:and
714:Time
606:and
504:and
496:and
459:The
419:and
374:and
314:Time
254:Time
199:and
146:and
3440:C++
3374:BBC
2835:doi
2734:doi
2575:doi
2519:doi
2467:doi
2340:doi
2301:doi
2189:doi
2124:doi
2066:doi
1814:doi
1756:doi
1704:doi
1573:doi
1275:hdl
1233:doi
1192:hdl
1182:doi
1133:hdl
1123:doi
1027:doi
842:?"
819:Vox
719:NPR
616:);
531:or
452:by
368:).
352:);
344:);
336:);
328:);
320:);
304:);
296:);
284:);
276:);
268:);
260:);
56:or
3915::
3098:.
3081:,
3030:.
3017:^
2981:.
2955:.
2936:.
2911:.
2899:^
2880:.
2857:.
2849:.
2841:.
2831:18
2829:.
2825:.
2807:^
2791:.
2766:.
2754:^
2740:.
2730:62
2728:.
2724:.
2704:^
2685:.
2659:.
2636:.
2626:45
2624:.
2620:.
2597:.
2589:.
2581:.
2571:67
2569:.
2565:.
2547:^
2533:.
2525:.
2515:15
2513:.
2509:.
2495:^
2481:.
2473:.
2463:24
2461:.
2457:.
2439:^
2425:.
2415:34
2413:.
2409:.
2395:^
2381:.
2346:.
2336:32
2334:.
2330:.
2307:.
2297:33
2295:.
2291:.
2277:^
2263:.
2226:.
2203:.
2195:.
2185:34
2183:.
2146:.
2138:.
2130:.
2120:74
2118:.
2114:.
2102:^
2088:.
2080:.
2072:.
2062:27
2060:.
2056:.
2042:^
2026:.
2002:.
1991:^
1975:.
1950:.
1928:.
1918:38
1916:.
1912:.
1896:^
1875:.
1850:.
1828:.
1820:.
1810:16
1808:.
1804:.
1792:^
1778:.
1770:.
1762:.
1752:50
1750:.
1746:.
1732:^
1718:.
1710:.
1698:.
1694:.
1682:^
1662:.
1658:.
1635:.
1623:.
1619:.
1601:^
1587:.
1579:.
1569:14
1567:.
1563:.
1517:^
1501:.
1474:.
1452:.
1440:.
1424:^
1410:.
1400:25
1398:.
1394:.
1372:^
1358:.
1346:.
1311:.
1300:^
1255:^
1241:.
1229:13
1227:.
1223:.
1200:.
1190:.
1178:40
1176:.
1172:.
1149:.
1141:.
1131:.
1119:14
1117:.
1113:.
1092:}}
1088:{{
1076:.
1041:.
1033:.
1023:37
1017:.
993:}}
989:{{
944:.
822:,
721:.
620:,
602:,
558:,
554:,
550:,
500:.
492:,
488:,
316:,
312:,
288:;
256:,
227:,
223:,
203:.
191:,
187:,
167:.
142:,
102:,
3648:e
3641:t
3634:v
3599:)
3595:(
3524:e
3517:t
3510:v
3137:e
3130:t
3123:v
3040:.
3011:.
2991:.
2967:.
2940:.
2921:.
2893:.
2865:.
2837::
2801:.
2776:.
2748:.
2736::
2698:.
2670:.
2644:.
2605:.
2577::
2541:.
2521::
2489:.
2469::
2433:.
2389:.
2354:.
2342::
2315:.
2303::
2271:.
2236:.
2211:.
2191::
2168:.
2154:.
2126::
2096:.
2068::
2036:.
2012:.
1985:.
1960:.
1936:.
1890:.
1861:.
1836:.
1816::
1786:.
1758::
1726:.
1706::
1700:7
1676:.
1643:.
1625:8
1595:.
1575::
1511:.
1486:.
1460:.
1418:.
1366:.
1322:.
1277::
1249:.
1235::
1208:.
1194::
1184::
1157:.
1135::
1125::
1098:)
1084:.
1049:.
1029::
999:)
985:.
960:.
364:(
356:(
348:(
340:(
332:(
324:(
308:(
300:(
292:(
272:(
264:(
252:(
60:.
49:.
42:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.