94:'s Initiative on Neuroscience and the Law, now known as the national nonprofit, called the Center for Science & Law. SciLaw, as the organization is known, seeks to leverage neuroscience, law, ethics, programming, and data science to analyze policies and develop solutions to advance the criminal justice system. Their stated goal is to 'steer social policy in an evidenced-based manner, thereby reducing rates of incarceration and providing innovative options for improving the criminal justice system in a cost effective and humane way'. The
475:, brain scan results have been increasingly utilized during the sentencing phase of trials, with the rate of cases involving neuroscience evidence doubling from 2006 to 2009. In two instances occurring in California and New York, defendants were able to reduce their sentence of first-degree murder to manslaughter using neuroimaging. Each case presented brain scans suggesting hindered neurological function hoping to mitigate their responsibility in the crime. Brain images were also used in the case of
59:(fMRI) research has led to new insights on neuroanatomical structure and function, which has led to a greater understanding of human behavior and cognition. As a response, there has been an emergence of questions regarding how these findings can be applied to criminology and legal processes. Major areas of current neurolaw research include courtroom applications, legal implications of neuroscience findings, and how neuroscience-related jurisdiction can be created and applied.
507:
enhance the focus and memories of soldiers, allowing for better recognition of dangers and improved performance. However, this has led to questions regarding the personal privacy of soldiers and detainees, and the compliance requirements that may come with performance enhancement. Although the civilian court system is reluctant to use unproven technologies, the military's future use of them may generate controversy over the possible innocence or guilt of enemy combatants.
4006:
4680:
4020:
241:
activity in specific regions of the brain. Particularly, she exhibited increased activity in the middle and superior temporal gyri similar to the way that a healthy individual would. This positive response revealed potential for medical imaging to be used to understand the implications of brain death, and to help answer legal, scientific, and ethical questions pertaining to individuals in vegetative states.
161:
empathy, decision making, and impulsivity -- without reference to race -- the group states they can build better and fairer inroads to rehabilitation. As a risk assessment, it was found to be as predictive or more so than risk assessments commonly used. Holding consistent with their mission to "advance justice", the NCRA does not collect race data making for a more fair and unbiased assessment.
550:. A current operation of DARPA is named the Preventing Sleep Deprivation Program, which conducts research on the molecular processes and changes in the brain involved with sleep deprivation, with the ultimate purpose to maximize warfightersâ cognitive abilities, even with sleep deprivation. As a result of this research, sleep deprivation prevention drugs such as
4692:
4238:
204:" as legitimate grounds for mental illness. One of the factors neurosciences have added to the insanity defense is the claim that the brain âmade someone do it.â In these cases, the argument is based on the notion that individuals' decisions are made for them, before they are able to consciously realize what they are doing.
519:, address only the use of certain chemical agents and are not regulating the fast-paced evolution of recent advancements in cognitive science research. Due to this ambiguity and the potential of technology misuse, it has become increasingly pressing to address the regulations and ethics needed for neuroscience research.
212:
will lead to immediate satisfaction. It is responsible for moral reasoning, including regret. Individual variations that impair the PFC are extremely detrimental to the decision-making process and give an individual a greater likelihood in a committing a crime he or she would have otherwise not committed.
575:
Neuroscience is still not fully understood. There is not enough evidence of structural and functional relationships to be able to confidently link a brain feature to a criminal behavior or issue. This uncertainty leaves room for misuse of neuroscientific evidence in a courtroom. American professor of
420:
Future research aims to differentiate between when someone has genuinely forgotten an experience and when someone has made an active choice to withhold or fabricate information. Developing this distinction to the point of scientific validity would help discern when defendants are being truthful about
343:
Findings like this have sparked a conversation about 'neuroprediction' or using genetics and neuroimaging modalities to predict criminal behavior and assess individual risk. If the science behind prediction improves, lawmakers will need to decide the role that genetic, neuroanatomical, or neuropathic
240:
from an automobile accident. The woman was declared to be in a vegetative state; after five months she continued to be unresponsive, but brain pattern measurements indicated normal sleep and wake cycles. Using fMRI technology, researchers concluded that she was able to understand external stimuli via
592:
Although some experts recognize the possibilities and drawbacks of brain imaging, others still completely reject the field. In the future, judges must decide on the relevance and validity of neurological evidence so that it can enter the courtroom, and juries must be open to understanding scientific
588:
Lawmakers and judges are cautious due to the lack of concrete findings in neurolaw. Before making decisions on how to regulate and utilize neuroscience research in court, lawmakers and judges must consider the implications that will come with suggested changes. Neuroimaging and genetic evidence have
510:
With the advent of novel technological innovations and information in the field of neuroscience, the military has begun to anticipate specific uses for such neuroscience research. However, these approaches, which can alter human cognitive abilities as well as infringe on an individual's right to the
462:
Neurolaw techniques and policies are slowly entering the legal system due to professional and general public skepticism about its validity. Currently two companies, No Lie MRI and Cephos Corp, offer lie-detection services that utilize neuroimaging. Their services are considered to be a more advanced
453:
hearing concerning its admissibility in a criminal trial. Ultimately, the images were excluded based on doubts about neuroimaging validity. A 2012 appeal of the case failed to change the court's view of the matter. Legal professionals suggest that there are currently too many serious, open questions
160:
The Center for
Science & Law has developed a suite of mobile and gamified NeuroCognitive Risk Assessments (NCRA) to help steer people to the proper post-conviction rehabilitation programs by harnessing what drives individual decision making. By understanding individual differences in aggression,
437:
function need to be considered when viewing an fMRI image, and the sensitivity of the scanner needs to be considered as well. If the person being scanned is moving or inaccurately completing assigned tasks, the images produced will be invalid. Other critics highlight that the image derived from the
404:
False memories are a barrier in validating witness testimonies. Research has shown that when presented a list of semantically related words, participant recollection can often be unintentionally false and additive of words that were not originally present. This is a normal psychological occurrence
74:
journal article analyzing the role of psychologists and lawyers in the criminal justice system. After this publication, scholars from both fields began to network through presentations and dialogs, and start to publish books, articles, and other literature about this intersection. Parallel to the
211:
is evidence that a prime factor in mental illness is disrupted volition. Many experiments using fMRI show that one of the functions of the PFC is to bias a person towards taking the more difficult action. This action is representative of a long-term reward, and it is competing with an action that
506:
The United States
Military has become increasingly interested in the possibilities of neuroscience research. Brain imaging could help to distinguish between enemy combatants from those who pose no risk or determine the mental stability of their own soldiers. Nootropic drugs could also be used to
82:
The intersection of neurolaw and ethics was able to be better scrutinized by the initiation of the Law and
Neuroscience Project by The MacArthur Foundation. Phase I of this project was launched in 2007 with a $ 10 million grant. The initiative sustained forty projects addressing a multitude of
567:
Public opinion of neurolaw is influenced by cultural, political, and media-related factors. Surveys show that the general public does not have a well-formed understanding of neurolaw. Approval seems to depend highly on how the topic is framed and may even vary depending on partisanship. Due to
378:
Neuroimaging modalities can also be used to analyze neuroanatomical structures in terms of size and shape. Researchers are working towards defining the characteristics of healthy, well-functioning brain structures, which may help us better understand the dysfunctions and deficits in atypical,
416:
activates when a subject presents false recognition in contrast to lying or accurately telling a truth. This indicates that there may be two separate neural pathways for lying and false memory recall. However, there are limitations to how much brain imaging can distinguish between truths and
152:
evidence offer potentially more accurate modalities for predicting human behavior. Developing these tools to be used in criminology would be beneficial particularly in determining criminal sentence length and in assessing risk for which criminals should remain in jail or be released based on
235:
Research initiatives in cognition have helped to develop an understanding of the vegetative state. Research has shown that although a person can be awake and conscious, he or she may not show any signs of awareness or recognition to external stimulation. In 2005, research was conducted on a
136:
Recently, Petoft and his colleagues introduced a newly coined term: "Criminal perception" "as an ability that makes it possible for a child to understand criminal situations and behave lawfully." The term encompasses two distinct intertwined characteristics of children mean Social and Moral
157:, but they could also show indications for the need for personal rehabilitation. In light of this information and its potential applications, the legal system seeks to create a balance between punishment and penalties based on the ability to predict additional criminal activity.
137:
Personalities. The former employs the areas of the brain which contribute to normative cognition and person perception; and the latter stems from the cognitive networks by which gut feeling, emotional awareness, and conscious deliberation are realized in a criminal situation.
281:
Scientists and ethicists have attempted to answer these questions while analyzing the overall effect on society. For example, it is largely accepted that mind-enhancing drugs are acceptable for use on patients diagnosed with cognitive disorders, as in a case of prescribing
363:(BOLD) contrast, which allows us to view the most active areas of the brain at a given moment based on blood flow. This imaging modality allows researchers to identify and understand complex neural pathways and mechanisms. Relevant mechanisms in neurolaw research are
257:. The potential to significantly improve one's concentration, memory, or cognition through drug-use has raised numerous questions on the legality of these substances, and their appropriateness in everyday life. Analogous to the controversy over the use of
584:
or no responsibility for their actions because those actions were caused by "the brain", in situations where the science could not support such causal claims. He raises the question of whether brains should be blamed for crimes, or the people behind them.
589:
the potential to be helpful in legal processes and ensure that dangerous criminals stay behind bars, but it also has the potential to be abused in a way that imprisons undeserving parties on purpose or due to negligent use of the science.
114:(1997), which was used as a resource for attorneys to properly introduce medical jargon into the courtroom and to further develop the implications of neuroscience on litigation. In this book, Taylor also explained the consequences of
298:
It is ethically questionable whether individuals who do not need nootropics should use them, and mostly unknown how continued usage could impact the brain chemistry of someone who is using nootropics for non-prescriptive reasons.
294:
have also become popular black-market drugs, most notably on college campuses. Students often use them to maintain focus when struggling to complete large amounts of schoolwork, and often become dependent on the effects produced.
52:, neurolaw practitioners seek to address not only the descriptive and predictive issues of how neuroscience is and will be used in the legal system, but also the normative issues of how neuroscience should and should not be used.
339:
gene. Preliminary research suggests that males that have this dysfunctional gene and have experienced childhood abuse are several hundred times more likely to commit a violent crime than those with normal MAOA gene expression.
463:
form of a polygraph test but are rarely accepted as evidence in the courtroom. Use of neuroimaging evidence for structural and functional analysis varies greatly by geographic region and cultural acceptance of the modality.
572:". It is possible that some people have a false understanding of forensic science based on inaccurate portrayals. This could lead to them having a stronger opinion about technological evidence or neurolaw initiatives.
189:, which asserted that unless one was able to prove that a mental illness kept him or her from knowing that their actions were wrong, or knowing the disposition of the criminal act, one would not be able to be tried as
429:
The use of neuroimaging in the legal system creates a very divided audience. Many argue for its potential, while others argue it will not accurately replace human investigation of criminal decision-making processes.
2217:
Francis X. Shen; Dena M. Gromet (2015-02-08). "Red States, Blue States, and Brain States: Issue
Framing, Partisanship, and the Future of Neurolaw in the United States - Francis X. Shen, Dena M. Gromet, 2015".
494:, including a brain scan that suggested her guilt. This conviction was sharply criticized by Hank Greely, a professor of law at Stanford University. Greely contested the scan based on evidence produced by a
442:. Functional neuroimaging was not intended to calculate volition, and while it may offer insight into the processes that cause behavior, it is debated whether or not the images can objectively narrow in on
558:
CX717 have increased in significance. However, because these chemical drugs directly affect natural chemical reactions and receptors in the body, the ethics of their use as well as safety are in question.
20:
An example of an fMRI brain scan. fMRI BOLD outputs (yellow) are overlaid on a brain anatomy image (gray) averaged from several humans. Similar images are used in a variety of applications, now including
83:
issues, including experimental and theoretical data that will provide further evidence as to how neuroscience may eventually shape the law. The Gruter
Institute for Law and Behavioral Research and the
490:, the legal system has taken a more rapid approach in applying neuroscience and has already incorporated it into criminal convictions. In 2008, an Indian woman was convicted of murder based on strong
62:
Despite the growing interest in neurolaw and its potential applications, the legal realm recognizes the substantial opportunity for misuse and is proceeding cautiously with novel research outcomes.
1607:
Lanni, Cristina; Silvia C. Lenzken; Alessia
Pascale; Igor Del Vecchio; Marco Racchi; Francesca Pistoia; Stefano Govoni (Mar 2008). "Cognition enhancers between treating and doping the mind".
185:
was acquitted due to insanity in 1982, a reversal of this opinion occurred, which spurred a narrowing definition of mental illness. Insanity decisions became increasingly based on the
2727:
Jones, Owen, & Francis X. Shen (2012). "Law and
Neuroscience in the United States". International Neurolaw: A Comparative Analysis, p. 349, T.M. Spranger, ed. Springer-Verlag.
498:
test (BEOSP). No scientific peer-review studies had ever been published demonstrating the efficacy of BEOS, raising questions about its reliability in such an important decision.
307:
Neurolaw advancements depend on state-of-the-art medical technology and grant-funded research. Among the most prominent technologies and disciplines used in neurolaw research are
417:
deceptions because these regions are common areas of executive control function; It is difficult to tell if the activation seen is due to the lie told, or something unrelated.
4718:
2099:
Farah, Martha J.; Hutchinson, Benjamin; Phelps, Elizabeth A.; Wagner, Anthony D. (20 January 2014). "Functional MRI-based lie detection: scientific and societal challenges".
128:, which sets rules regarding the use of scientific evidence in the courtroom. This standard governs the way that neuroscience evidence can be presented during a court case.
483:, the brain images were solely shown to the judge and not a jury panel, reducing the ability of this case to be used as precedent for utilizing brain imaging as evidence.
446:
and specific thought processes. These factors make neuroimaging results hard to assess precisely, which is why there is hesitation towards presenting them in court cases.
331:
Current research is exploring how genetic analysis can be used to assess risk and predict atypical behaviors. Studies have shown links between violent behaviors and a low
253:, or mind-enhancing drugs. Current research suggests that the future may hold powerful medications that can specifically target and alter brain function by bypassing the
1467:
2746:
2667:
495:
17:
4600:
433:
Even considering recent research findings, neuroimaging is still inadequately understood. Additional medical factors like age, medication history, diet, and
98:âs Center for Neuroscience and Society began in July 2009, and is working towards confronting the social, legal, and ethical inferences of neuroscience.
261:
in professional sports, many high schools and universities are wary of students eventually using nootropics to artificially boost academic performance.
1243:
Aharoni, Eyal; Vincent, Gina M.; Harenski, Carla L.; Calhoun, Vince D.; Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter; Gazzaniga, Michael S.; Kiehl, Kent A. (2013-04-09).
580:
described the abuse of neuroscience in courtrooms with a pseudo-disease he called "brain overclaim syndrome". He comments on the idea of people having
3987:
866:
Button, Katherine S.; Ioannidis, John P. A.; Mokrysz, Claire; Nosek, Brian A.; Flint, Jonathan; Robinson, Emma S. J.; Munafò, Marcus R. (May 2013).
1333:
Ormachea, P.A.; Lovins, B.K.; Eagleman, D.M.; Davenport, S.; Jarman, A. (2017). "The role of tablet-based psychological tasks in risk assessment".
839:
207:
Further research on control and inhibition mechanisms will allow for further modifications to the insanity defense. Impaired functioning of the
4072:
1872:
116:
2714:
Jones, Owen; et al. (2009). "Brain
Imaging for Legal Thinkers: A Guide for the Perplexed". Vol. 5. Stanford Technology Law Review.
2525:
2307:
979:
512:
308:
56:
2428:
1722:"Performance enhancement at the cost of potential brain plasticity: neural ramifications of nootropic drugs in the healthy developing brain"
963:
360:
352:
Understanding structural and mechanistic neural dysfunction in criminals can help to determine motives and define criminal responsibility.
228:. From the exterior, it is a difficult to know when a patient is beyond hope for recovery, as well as to decide who has the right to end
1411:"Assessing Risk Among Correctional Community Probation Populations: Predicting Reoffense With Mobile Neurocognitive Assessment Software"
531:
274:
How does society distinguish between what is an acceptable substance (e.g., caffeine) and an unacceptable substance to alter one's mind?
110:
A few important sources have shaped the way that neuroscience is currently used in the courtroom. Primarily, J. Sherrod Taylor's book,
2290:
Jones, Owen D.; Jones, Owen D.; Shen, Francis X. (2012), Spranger, Tade
Matthias (ed.), "Law and Neuroscience in the United States",
4580:
3413:
2971:
2870:
1311:
3527:
3396:
538:
in 2013, DARPA began to support this initiative through a number of programs involving under-researched neuroscience topics like
169:
The tendency of the United States criminal justice system has been to limit the degree to which one can claim innocence based on
2771:
Wagner, Anthony; et al. (2016). "fMRI and Lie
Detection". "MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Law and Neuroscience".
3982:
3329:
3230:
1508:
3489:
3123:
2278:
409:
1977:
Shen, Francis X.; Jones, Owen D. (2011-02-23). "Brain Scans as Evidence: Truths, Proofs, Lies, and Lessons". Rochester, NY.
1779:
Nadelhoffer, Thomas; SinnottâArmstrong, Walter (2012-09-01). "Neurolaw and Neuroprediction: Potential Promises and Perils".
2805:
1016:
4421:
2842:
2642:
Ienca, Marcello, & Roberto Andorno (2017). "Towards New Human Rights in the Age of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology".
344:
predictions can play in legal decisions for risk assessment, particularly when a criminal is being sentenced or released.
4575:
2484:
Jones, Owen D.; Wagner, Anthony D. (2018-04-01). "Law and Neuroscience: Progress, Promise, and Pitfalls". Rochester, NY.
622:
534:, is responsible for significant amount of military research and development of technology. With the announcement of the
4396:
3649:
3128:
312:
1370:"Enabling Individualized Criminal Sentencing While Reducing Subjectivity: A Tablet-Based Assessment of Recidivism Risk"
4615:
3644:
516:
221:
196:
Contemporary research conducted on the prefrontal cortex has criticized this standpoint because it considers impaired
121:
1702:
1542:
511:
privacy of his or her own thoughts, are still innovatory and early in development. Present day treaties, such as the
623:"A Historical Overview of Law and Neuroscience: From the Emergence of Medico-Legal Discourses to Developed Neurolaw"
568:
glorified depictions of forensics labs on popular television shows, brain imaging has faced criticism for having a "
4142:
4065:
3619:
3118:
539:
316:
95:
91:
2600:
4610:
4585:
4454:
3702:
581:
71:
408:
fMRI imaging is also being used to analyze brain activity during intentional lies. Findings have shown that the
87:
are some of the prominent institutions that receive grants and conduct neurolaw research under this initiative.
4723:
4549:
4524:
4449:
4356:
4261:
4157:
3497:
3479:
3148:
254:
4696:
837:
Goodenough, Oliver R. and Macaela Tucker; Tucker, Micaela (December 2010). "Law and Cognitive Neuroscience".
737:
728:
4386:
4097:
4092:
3872:
3659:
3133:
2699:
2376:
491:
1188:"Toward children's cognitive development from the perspective of neurolaw: implications of Roper v Simmons"
1080:
16:
4381:
4371:
4281:
4162:
4117:
3927:
3912:
2583:
Morse, S. (2006). Brain Overclaim Syndrome and Criminal Responsibility: A Diagnostic Note. Retrieved from
2108:
1563:
237:
177:
and the American Law Institute Model Penal Code, regarded impaired volition as legitimate grounds for the
45:
1034:
4684:
4444:
4439:
4246:
4137:
4058:
4031:
3624:
3302:
3113:
2497:
1990:
1129:
989:
801:
197:
145:
99:
1104:
915:
Taylor, J. Sherrod; J. Anderson Harp; Tyron Elliott (Oct 1991). "Neuropsychologists and Neurolawyers".
4665:
4416:
4256:
4227:
4122:
3752:
3098:
2540:
1659:
1568:
1256:
364:
201:
2400:
Clancy, Frank (2006-01-17). "At Military's Behest, Darpa Uses Neuroscience To Harness Brain Power".
1913:
186:
4559:
4459:
4336:
4306:
4291:
3907:
3047:
2964:
2113:
336:
449:
Controversy over the science behind fMRI lie detection entered a federal courtroom in 2010 with a
153:
prediction of future offenses. Not only could the adaptation of these tools aid in the process of
4635:
4529:
4469:
4192:
4172:
3722:
3381:
3235:
3220:
3198:
2942:
2922:
2875:
2865:
2740:
2661:
2634:
2617:
2566:
2436:
2231:
2134:
1959:
1683:
1589:
1386:
1369:
1350:
1225:
1168:
749:
397:, particularly in identifying the regions of the brain involved in truth telling, deception, and
388:
2810:
2694:
2079:"Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee at Jackson"
2078:
1148:
4554:
4489:
4464:
4316:
4276:
3707:
3629:
3467:
3210:
3205:
3158:
3083:
3077:
2917:
2835:
2776:
2772:
2732:
2728:
2719:
2715:
2558:
2489:
2485:
2463:
2303:
2269:
2196:
2178:
2126:
2060:
2030:
2026:
1982:
1978:
1951:
1905:
1853:
1835:
1796:
1761:
1743:
1675:
1632:
1624:
1581:
1500:
1442:
1391:
1292:
1274:
1217:
975:
948:
944:
897:
889:
771:
706:
688:
644:
602:
258:
208:
190:
41:
2676:
4595:
4479:
4406:
4321:
4202:
4152:
3712:
3679:
3178:
3042:
3037:
3002:
2647:
2548:
2409:
2295:
2223:
2186:
2168:
2118:
1943:
1895:
1887:
1843:
1827:
1788:
1751:
1733:
1667:
1616:
1573:
1490:
1482:
1432:
1422:
1381:
1342:
1282:
1264:
1207:
1199:
1160:
971:
967:
924:
879:
852:
848:
761:
696:
680:
634:
577:
535:
434:
178:
125:
2257:
4655:
4650:
4645:
4640:
4534:
4474:
4411:
4326:
4286:
4271:
4222:
4212:
4167:
3961:
3934:
3922:
3902:
3836:
3831:
3814:
3794:
3789:
3769:
3634:
3614:
3609:
3512:
3472:
3183:
3108:
3032:
3017:
2937:
2510:
2003:
1463:
1409:
Haarsma, G.; Davenport, S.; White, D.C.; Ormachea, P.A.; Sheena, E.; Eagleman, D. (2020).
1002:
814:
547:
405:
but presents numerous problems to a jury when attempting to sort out the facts of a case.
271:
Will it become necessary to use an enhancing drug simply to remain competitive in society?
84:
1930:
Farah, Martha; Hutchinson, J. Benjamin; Phelps, Elizabeth; Wagner, Anthony (2014-01-01).
2544:
1663:
1260:
1212:
1187:
4620:
4590:
4519:
4494:
4484:
4331:
4311:
4301:
4187:
4107:
4038:
3846:
3764:
3353:
3319:
3270:
3255:
3027:
2932:
2912:
2902:
2358:
2191:
2156:
1900:
1848:
1816:"Using Brain Imaging for Lie Detection: Where Science, Law and Research Policy Collide"
1815:
1756:
1721:
1495:
1437:
1410:
1287:
1244:
766:
701:
668:
639:
543:
439:
170:
1529:
4712:
4544:
4539:
4504:
4401:
4391:
4351:
4197:
4132:
4127:
3892:
3851:
3737:
3717:
3689:
3639:
3604:
3578:
3573:
3566:
3517:
3457:
3297:
3287:
3245:
3168:
3163:
3093:
3052:
2976:
2570:
2413:
2326:
2235:
1792:
1354:
1229:
1172:
472:
394:
368:
356:
277:
Do people have the right to experiment with substances to modify their own cognition?
182:
2339:
1931:
1593:
4630:
4625:
4509:
4341:
4266:
4217:
4207:
4182:
4177:
4147:
4081:
4024:
3774:
3742:
3697:
3435:
3430:
3401:
3314:
3292:
3260:
3193:
3173:
3067:
3007:
2997:
2949:
2907:
2885:
2828:
2138:
1963:
1687:
527:
398:
229:
224:
have come to the forefront of many ethical, legal, and scientific issues regarding
149:
33:
29:
2755:
2584:
1650:
Sahakian, Barbara; Sharon Morein-Zamir (2007-12-20). "Professor's little helper".
1203:
1081:"Dual Degree Programs | Prospective Students | Law School | Vanderbilt University"
28:
is a field of interdisciplinary study that explores the effects of discoveries in
2451:
2299:
868:"Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience"
4499:
4346:
4005:
3946:
3887:
3877:
3674:
3669:
3507:
3408:
3324:
3283:
3250:
3215:
3138:
3062:
3012:
2927:
2045:
1020:
522:
Another area of interest to the military is the use of human enhancement drugs.
413:
372:
320:
225:
174:
76:
49:
2321:
Church, D. J. (2012). Neuroscience in the Courtroom: An International Concern.
1620:
1554:
Owen; et al. (2006-09-08). "Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State".
1164:
268:
How will these enhancers affect performance gaps between family income classes?
4660:
4361:
4010:
3939:
3819:
3757:
3502:
3423:
3418:
3376:
3358:
3346:
3307:
3153:
3143:
3103:
3088:
3072:
3022:
2959:
2954:
2652:
2626:
2609:
1368:
Ormachea, P.A.; Davenport, S.; Haarsma, G.; Jarman, A.; Henderson, H. (2016).
928:
569:
250:
154:
37:
2273:
2227:
2182:
2173:
1839:
1800:
1747:
1738:
1628:
1427:
1346:
1278:
893:
692:
421:
their actions and when witnesses are being truthful about their experiences.
4605:
4296:
3917:
3882:
3824:
3799:
3664:
3561:
3549:
3534:
3522:
3450:
3368:
3341:
3225:
1891:
1577:
1269:
551:
2795:
2763:
2562:
2467:
2200:
2130:
2064:
1955:
1909:
1857:
1765:
1679:
1636:
1585:
1504:
1486:
1446:
1395:
1296:
1221:
901:
775:
710:
648:
454:
about the suitability of neuroimaging for legal or other high stakes uses.
2796:
The MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Law and Neuroscience homepage
2017:
Kuersten, Andreas (2016). "When a Picture is Not Worth a Thousand Words".
3966:
3951:
3654:
3539:
3336:
2880:
555:
412:
activates when subjects are pretending to know information, but that the
355:
fMRI is particularly important because it allows for detailed functional
283:
1932:"Functional MRI-Based Lie Detection: Scientific and Societal Challenges"
90:
Neurolaw has also piqued the interests of several universities, such as
3856:
3804:
3784:
3732:
3544:
3462:
3278:
3240:
3188:
2815:
684:
450:
291:
2800:
264:
Some of the questions raised regarding the use of nootropics include:
70:
The term neurolaw was first coined by J. Sherrod Taylor in 1991, in a
3956:
3809:
3554:
3445:
3440:
3386:
3057:
2685:
1831:
1671:
790:
487:
443:
332:
2553:
2157:"Prospects of functional magnetic resonance imaging as lie detector"
2122:
1947:
884:
867:
593:
concepts but not be too willing to place all faith in neuroscience.
200:
as a factor. Many researchers and courts are beginning to consider "
4237:
669:"Neurolaw: recognizing opportunities and challenges for psychiatry"
393:
There is potential to use fMRI evidence as a more advanced form of
3897:
3841:
3747:
3588:
3391:
2890:
2688:. International Journal of Public Mental Health and Neurosciences.
2220:
The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
796:. International Journal of Public Mental Health and Neurosciences.
523:
15:
2686:"Toward Human Behavior Sciences from the Perspective of Neurolaw"
791:"Toward Human Behavior Sciences from the Perspective of Neurolaw"
173:. During the middle of the 20th century many courts, through the
3779:
3727:
3583:
2981:
2897:
2340:"A Pentagon Agency Is Looking at Brains -- And Raising Eyebrows"
1066:
287:
4054:
4050:
2824:
1873:"Neural Correlates of True Memory, False Memory, and Deception"
2851:
1105:"A Vanderbilt First - Vanderbilt Lawyer (Volume 40, Number 1)"
1038:
102:
created the first dual J.D./PhD in the United States in 2010.
479:
in 2003 as evidence for the defense. However, in the case of
1814:
Langleben, Daniel D.; Moriarty, Jane Campbell (2013-05-01).
2456:
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
2053:
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
2155:
Rusconi, Elena; Mitchener-Nissen, Timothy (2013-09-24).
1312:"Neuroimaging and the Complexity of Capital Punishment"
1149:"Children's Criminal Perception; Lessons from Neurolaw"
1130:"Book Review: Neurolaw: Brain and Spinal Cord Injuries"
2820:
2429:"Safety Concerns Raised Over Popular Wakefulness Drug"
249:
Neurolaw also encompasses ethical questions regarding
2790:
2357:
Huang, Jonathan Y.; Margaret E. Kosal (2008-06-20).
2086:
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1468:"The frontal cortex and the criminal justice system"
1052:
1019:. The Law & Neuroscience Project. Archived from
4568:
4430:
4370:
4245:
4106:
3975:
3865:
3688:
3597:
3488:
3367:
3269:
2990:
2858:
2610:"Neuroscience and the Legal System: David Eagleman"
2327:http://www.antoniocasella.eu/dnlaw/Church_2012.pdf
937:Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology
2811:NPR: Jeffrey Rosen on 'Neurolaw' in the Courtroom
935:Erickson, Steven K. (2010). "Blaming the Brain".
2294:, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 349â380,
2046:"Neuroimaging, Culture, and Forensic Psychiatry"
1128:Juliano, Elizabeth; James R. Fell (April 1998).
496:Brain Electrical Oscillation Signature Profiling
2585:http://repository.upenn.edu/neuroethics_pubs/28
1720:Urban, Kimberly R.; Gao, Wen-Jun (2014-05-13).
1523:
1521:
1249:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
526:(Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), a
2292:International Neurolaw: A Comparative Analysis
2150:
2148:
4066:
2836:
8:
4601:Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring
2745:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
2666:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
1387:10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.3.stas1-1603
1037:. Baylor College of Medicine. Archived from
832:
830:
828:
826:
824:
1458:
1456:
32:on legal rules and standards. Drawing from
4719:Interdisciplinary branches of neuroscience
4073:
4059:
4051:
2843:
2829:
2821:
2452:"Commentary: Functional MRI Lie Detection"
2359:"The security impact of the neurosciences"
722:
720:
2651:
2552:
2190:
2172:
2112:
1899:
1847:
1755:
1737:
1567:
1494:
1436:
1426:
1385:
1286:
1268:
1211:
883:
765:
700:
638:
3988:History of the American legal profession
2627:"David Eagleman - The Brain and The Law"
2526:"Science in court: Arrested development"
673:Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience
438:technology does not display the brain's
2251:
2249:
2247:
2245:
1528:Eagleman, David M. (MarchâApril 2008).
853:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131523
840:Annual Review of Law and Social Science
727:Eagleman, David M. (JulyâAugust 2011).
613:
75:expansion of neurolaw, an emergence of
2738:
2659:
2506:
2495:
1999:
1988:
998:
987:
810:
799:
124:case resulted in what is now known as
117:Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
112:Neurolaw: Brain and Spinal Cord Injury
2603:. No. July/August. The Atlantic.
2479:
2477:
2212:
2210:
2019:George Washington Law Review Arguendo
1067:"Center for Neuroscience and Society"
972:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935314.013.45
309:functional magnetic resonance imaging
220:Injuries or illnesses that lead to a
57:functional magnetic resonance imaging
7:
4691:
2325:, 53(5), 1825â1854. Retrieved from
1245:"Neuroprediction of future rearrest"
662:
660:
658:
2816:Law and Neuroscience Email Listserv
2764:"Law and Neuroscience Bibliography"
532:United States Department of Defense
2801:Law and Neuroscience at Vanderbilt
2608:The Lavin Agency Speakers Bureau.
1820:Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
14:
4581:Development of the nervous system
2972:Restitution and unjust enrichment
2644:Life Sciences, Society and Policy
2363:Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
1726:Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
4690:
4679:
4678:
4236:
4019:
4018:
4004:
2677:"Neurolaw: a brief introduction"
2637:from the original on 2021-12-15.
2620:from the original on 2021-12-15.
2414:10.1097/00132985-200601170-00004
2377:"DARPA and the Brain Initiative"
1793:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00494.x
962:Morse, Stephen J. (2017-02-06).
750:"Neurolaw: a brief introduction"
513:U.N. Declaration of Human Rights
236:23-year-old female who suffered
3983:History of the legal profession
2806:Neurolaw: The Scales of Justice
2756:"Law and Neuroscience Casebook"
2679:. Iranian Journal of Neurology.
2161:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
1871:Abe, Nobuhito (December 2008).
1701:Talbot, Margaret (2009-04-27).
2427:Kluger, Jeffrey (2009-03-17).
1316:New York University Law Review
1192:Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
410:dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
1:
4422:Social cognitive neuroscience
2693:Rosen, Jeffrey (2007-03-11).
2450:Merikangas, James R. (2008).
2338:Begley, Sharon (2006-12-15).
2323:William & Mary Law Review
1335:Criminal Justice and Behavior
1204:10.1080/13218719.2021.2003267
1069:. University of Pennsylvania.
4397:Molecular cellular cognition
2646:. Vol. 13, no. 5.
2300:10.1007/978-3-642-21541-4_19
1475:Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B
517:Chemical Weapons Conventions
361:blood oxygen level dependent
313:positron emission tomography
286:to children and adults with
4616:Neurodevelopmental disorder
4591:Neural network (biological)
4586:Neural network (artificial)
2524:Buchen, L (18 April 2012).
2256:Chen, Ingfei (2009-10-21).
2101:Nature Reviews Neuroscience
1936:Nature Reviews Neuroscience
872:Nature Reviews Neuroscience
481:Harrington v. State of Iowa
477:Harrington v. State of Iowa
222:persistent vegetative state
122:United States Supreme Court
4740:
4143:Computational neuroscience
3650:International legal theory
3129:International slavery laws
3124:International human rights
3119:International criminal law
2044:Aggarwal, Neil K. (2009).
1621:10.1016/j.phrs.2008.02.004
1530:"Neuroscience and the Law"
1165:10.1007/s12187-022-09928-2
414:right anterior hippocampus
386:
357:mapping of the human brain
317:magnetic resonance imaging
96:University of Pennsylvania
92:Baylor College of Medicine
4674:
4611:Neurodegenerative disease
4455:Evolutionary neuroscience
4234:
4088:
3998:
3703:Administration of justice
2791:Center of Science and Law
2754:Jones, Owen; et al.
2653:10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1
1310:Snead, O. Carter (2007).
1153:Child Indicators Research
1035:"Goals of the Initiative"
929:10.1037/0894-4105.5.4.293
582:diminished responsibility
4576:Brainâcomputer interface
4525:Neuromorphic engineering
4450:Educational neuroscience
4357:Nutritional neuroscience
4262:Clinical neurophysiology
4158:Integrative neuroscience
3480:Basic structure doctrine
3330:Natural and legal rights
3211:Public international law
2695:"The Brain on the Stand"
2599:Eagleman, David (2011).
2228:10.1177/0002716214555693
2174:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00594
1739:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00038
1609:Pharmacological Research
1428:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02926
1347:10.1177/0093854817714018
375:, and deceit circuitry.
290:. However, Adderall and
4387:Behavioral neuroscience
3660:Principle of typicality
3134:International trade law
2700:New York Times Magazine
2344:The Wall Street Journal
1578:10.1126/science.1130197
1415:Frontiers in Psychology
1270:10.1073/pnas.1219302110
667:Meynen, Gerben (2019).
502:Government and military
492:circumstantial evidence
458:Application in practice
425:Neuroimaging criticisms
4382:Affective neuroscience
4163:Molecular neuroscience
4118:Behavioral epigenetics
2684:Petoft, Arian (2015).
2675:Petoft, Arian (2015).
2505:Cite journal requires
1998:Cite journal requires
1487:10.1098/rstb.2004.1547
1186:Petoft, Arian (2022).
1147:Petoft, Arian (2022).
997:Cite journal requires
809:Cite journal requires
789:Petoft, Arian (2015).
748:Petoft, Arian (2015).
621:Petoft, Arian (2019).
238:traumatic brain injury
46:cognitive neuroscience
22:
4445:Cultural neuroscience
4440:Consumer neuroscience
4282:Neurogastroenterology
4138:Cellular neuroscience
3655:Principle of legality
3414:Delegated legislation
3114:Intellectual property
1892:10.1093/cercor/bhn037
1374:AMA Journal of Ethics
563:Cautions and concerns
100:Vanderbilt University
19:
4417:Sensory neuroscience
4257:Behavioral neurology
4228:Systems neuroscience
3873:Barristers' chambers
3815:Legal representation
3753:Justice of the peace
3099:Financial regulation
2601:"The Brain on Trial"
729:"The Brain on Trial"
202:irresistible impulse
55:The rapid growth of
4560:Social neuroscience
4460:Global neurosurgery
4337:Neurorehabilitation
4307:Neuro-ophthalmology
4292:Neurointensive care
4123:Behavioral genetics
3908:Election commission
3620:Expressive function
3149:Landlordâtenant law
3048:Consumer protection
2545:2012Natur.484..304B
1664:2007Natur.450.1157S
1658:(7173): 1157â1159.
1481:(1451): 1787â1796.
1464:Sapolsky, Robert M.
1261:2013PNAS..110.6223A
576:law and psychology
255:blood brain barrier
132:Criminal perception
4636:Neuroimmune system
4530:Neurophenomenology
4470:Neural engineering
4193:Neuroendocrinology
4173:Neural engineering
3866:Legal institutions
3733:Lawsuit/Litigation
3723:Dispute resolution
3528:Catholic canon law
3236:State of emergency
3199:Will and testament
2923:Law of obligations
2876:Constitutional law
2866:Administrative law
2439:on March 18, 2009.
1781:Philosophy Compass
1534:The Houston Lawyer
1109:law.vanderbilt.edu
1085:law.vanderbilt.edu
1017:"History: Phase I"
685:10.1503/jpn.150317
389:FMRI lie detection
146:Behavioral testing
23:
4706:
4705:
4555:Paleoneurobiology
4490:Neuroepistemology
4465:Neuroanthropology
4431:Interdisciplinary
4317:Neuropharmacology
4277:Neuroepidemiology
4048:
4047:
3708:Constitutionalism
3630:Law and economics
3468:Act of parliament
3206:Product liability
3159:Legal archaeology
3084:Environmental law
3078:Entertainment law
2918:International law
2309:978-3-642-21541-4
1886:(12): 2811â2819.
1255:(15): 6223â6228.
981:978-0-19-993531-4
603:Cognitive liberty
379:criminal brains.
259:anabolic steroids
191:criminally insane
42:social psychology
4731:
4694:
4693:
4682:
4681:
4596:Detection theory
4480:Neurocriminology
4407:Neurolinguistics
4322:Neuroprosthetics
4240:
4203:Neuroinformatics
4153:Imaging genetics
4075:
4068:
4061:
4052:
4023:
4022:
4021:
4009:
4008:
3832:Question of fact
3713:Criminal justice
3043:Construction law
3038:Conflict of laws
3003:Agricultural law
2845:
2838:
2831:
2822:
2780:
2767:
2759:
2750:
2744:
2736:
2723:
2710:
2708:
2707:
2689:
2680:
2671:
2665:
2657:
2655:
2638:
2621:
2604:
2587:
2581:
2575:
2574:
2556:
2530:
2521:
2515:
2514:
2508:
2503:
2501:
2493:
2481:
2472:
2471:
2447:
2441:
2440:
2435:. Archived from
2424:
2418:
2417:
2397:
2391:
2390:
2388:
2387:
2373:
2367:
2366:
2354:
2348:
2347:
2335:
2329:
2319:
2313:
2312:
2287:
2281:
2277:
2253:
2240:
2239:
2214:
2205:
2204:
2194:
2176:
2152:
2143:
2142:
2116:
2096:
2090:
2089:
2083:
2075:
2069:
2068:
2050:
2041:
2035:
2034:
2014:
2008:
2007:
2001:
1996:
1994:
1986:
1974:
1968:
1967:
1927:
1921:
1920:
1918:
1912:. Archived from
1903:
1877:
1868:
1862:
1861:
1851:
1832:10.1037/a0028841
1811:
1805:
1804:
1776:
1770:
1769:
1759:
1741:
1717:
1711:
1710:
1698:
1692:
1691:
1672:10.1038/4501157a
1647:
1641:
1640:
1604:
1598:
1597:
1571:
1569:10.1.1.1022.2193
1551:
1545:
1541:
1525:
1516:
1515:
1513:
1507:. Archived from
1498:
1472:
1460:
1451:
1450:
1440:
1430:
1406:
1400:
1399:
1389:
1365:
1359:
1358:
1330:
1324:
1323:
1307:
1301:
1300:
1290:
1272:
1240:
1234:
1233:
1215:
1183:
1177:
1176:
1159:(1): 1905â1920.
1144:
1138:
1137:
1134:The MIM Reporter
1125:
1119:
1118:
1116:
1115:
1101:
1095:
1094:
1092:
1091:
1077:
1071:
1070:
1063:
1057:
1056:
1049:
1043:
1042:
1031:
1025:
1024:
1013:
1007:
1006:
1000:
995:
993:
985:
959:
953:
952:
932:
912:
906:
905:
887:
863:
857:
856:
834:
819:
818:
812:
807:
805:
797:
795:
786:
780:
779:
769:
745:
739:
736:
724:
715:
714:
704:
664:
653:
652:
642:
618:
578:Stephen J. Morse
536:BRAIN Initiative
359:. fMRI measures
303:Current research
181:. However, when
179:insanity defense
165:Insanity defense
141:Crime prediction
126:Daubert Standard
106:Neurocriminology
79:was developing.
4739:
4738:
4734:
4733:
4732:
4730:
4729:
4728:
4724:Science and law
4709:
4708:
4707:
4702:
4670:
4656:Neurotechnology
4651:Neuroplasticity
4646:Neuromodulation
4641:Neuromanagement
4564:
4535:Neurophilosophy
4432:
4426:
4412:Neuropsychology
4373:
4366:
4327:Neuropsychiatry
4287:Neuroimmunology
4272:Neurocardiology
4248:
4241:
4232:
4223:Neurophysiology
4213:Neuromorphology
4168:Neural decoding
4109:
4102:
4084:
4079:
4049:
4044:
4017:
4003:
3994:
3971:
3962:Political party
3935:Legal education
3923:Law enforcement
3903:Court of equity
3861:
3837:Question of law
3790:Practice of law
3770:Judicial review
3684:
3635:Legal formalism
3615:Comparative law
3610:Contract theory
3593:
3513:Legal pluralism
3484:
3473:Act of Congress
3397:Executive order
3363:
3265:
3184:Nationality law
3109:Immigration law
3033:Competition law
2986:
2854:
2849:
2787:
2770:
2762:
2753:
2737:
2726:
2713:
2705:
2703:
2692:
2683:
2674:
2658:
2641:
2624:
2607:
2598:
2595:
2593:Further reading
2590:
2582:
2578:
2554:10.1038/484304a
2539:(7394): 304â6.
2528:
2523:
2522:
2518:
2504:
2494:
2483:
2482:
2475:
2449:
2448:
2444:
2426:
2425:
2421:
2402:Neurology Today
2399:
2398:
2394:
2385:
2383:
2375:
2374:
2370:
2356:
2355:
2351:
2337:
2336:
2332:
2320:
2316:
2310:
2289:
2288:
2284:
2262:Stanford Lawyer
2255:
2254:
2243:
2216:
2215:
2208:
2154:
2153:
2146:
2123:10.1038/nrn3665
2098:
2097:
2093:
2081:
2077:
2076:
2072:
2048:
2043:
2042:
2038:
2016:
2015:
2011:
1997:
1987:
1976:
1975:
1971:
1948:10.1038/nrn3665
1929:
1928:
1924:
1916:
1880:Cerebral Cortex
1875:
1870:
1869:
1865:
1813:
1812:
1808:
1778:
1777:
1773:
1719:
1718:
1714:
1700:
1699:
1695:
1649:
1648:
1644:
1606:
1605:
1601:
1553:
1552:
1548:
1527:
1526:
1519:
1511:
1470:
1462:
1461:
1454:
1408:
1407:
1403:
1367:
1366:
1362:
1341:(8): 993â1008.
1332:
1331:
1327:
1309:
1308:
1304:
1242:
1241:
1237:
1185:
1184:
1180:
1146:
1145:
1141:
1127:
1126:
1122:
1113:
1111:
1103:
1102:
1098:
1089:
1087:
1079:
1078:
1074:
1065:
1064:
1060:
1051:
1050:
1046:
1033:
1032:
1028:
1015:
1014:
1010:
996:
986:
982:
961:
960:
956:
934:
917:Neuropsychology
914:
913:
909:
885:10.1038/nrn3475
865:
864:
860:
836:
835:
822:
808:
798:
793:
788:
787:
783:
747:
746:
742:
726:
725:
718:
666:
665:
656:
627:Archivio Penale
620:
619:
615:
611:
599:
565:
548:neurotechnology
540:neuromodulation
504:
469:
460:
444:human reasoning
427:
391:
385:
350:
335:variant of the
329:
305:
247:
218:
187:MâNaghten Rules
167:
143:
134:
108:
85:Dana Foundation
72:Neuropsychology
68:
12:
11:
5:
4737:
4735:
4727:
4726:
4721:
4711:
4710:
4704:
4703:
4701:
4700:
4688:
4675:
4672:
4671:
4669:
4668:
4666:Self-awareness
4663:
4658:
4653:
4648:
4643:
4638:
4633:
4628:
4623:
4621:Neurodiversity
4618:
4613:
4608:
4603:
4598:
4593:
4588:
4583:
4578:
4572:
4570:
4566:
4565:
4563:
4562:
4557:
4552:
4547:
4542:
4537:
4532:
4527:
4522:
4520:Neuromarketing
4517:
4512:
4507:
4502:
4497:
4495:Neuroesthetics
4492:
4487:
4485:Neuroeconomics
4482:
4477:
4472:
4467:
4462:
4457:
4452:
4447:
4442:
4436:
4434:
4428:
4427:
4425:
4424:
4419:
4414:
4409:
4404:
4399:
4394:
4389:
4384:
4378:
4376:
4368:
4367:
4365:
4364:
4359:
4354:
4349:
4344:
4339:
4334:
4332:Neuroradiology
4329:
4324:
4319:
4314:
4312:Neuropathology
4309:
4304:
4302:Neuro-oncology
4299:
4294:
4289:
4284:
4279:
4274:
4269:
4264:
4259:
4253:
4251:
4243:
4242:
4235:
4233:
4231:
4230:
4225:
4220:
4215:
4210:
4205:
4200:
4195:
4190:
4188:Neurochemistry
4185:
4180:
4175:
4170:
4165:
4160:
4155:
4150:
4145:
4140:
4135:
4130:
4125:
4120:
4114:
4112:
4104:
4103:
4101:
4100:
4095:
4089:
4086:
4085:
4080:
4078:
4077:
4070:
4063:
4055:
4046:
4045:
4043:
4042:
4035:
4028:
4014:
4011:Law portal
3999:
3996:
3995:
3993:
3992:
3991:
3990:
3979:
3977:
3973:
3972:
3970:
3969:
3964:
3959:
3954:
3949:
3944:
3943:
3942:
3932:
3931:
3930:
3920:
3915:
3910:
3905:
3900:
3895:
3890:
3885:
3880:
3875:
3869:
3867:
3863:
3862:
3860:
3859:
3854:
3849:
3847:Trial advocacy
3844:
3839:
3834:
3829:
3828:
3827:
3822:
3817:
3812:
3807:
3802:
3797:
3787:
3782:
3777:
3772:
3767:
3762:
3761:
3760:
3755:
3745:
3740:
3735:
3730:
3725:
3720:
3715:
3710:
3705:
3700:
3694:
3692:
3686:
3685:
3683:
3682:
3677:
3672:
3667:
3662:
3657:
3652:
3647:
3642:
3637:
3632:
3627:
3622:
3617:
3612:
3607:
3601:
3599:
3595:
3594:
3592:
3591:
3586:
3581:
3576:
3571:
3570:
3569:
3559:
3558:
3557:
3552:
3547:
3542:
3537:
3532:
3531:
3530:
3515:
3510:
3505:
3500:
3494:
3492:
3486:
3485:
3483:
3482:
3477:
3476:
3475:
3470:
3465:
3455:
3454:
3453:
3443:
3438:
3433:
3428:
3427:
3426:
3421:
3416:
3406:
3405:
3404:
3399:
3394:
3384:
3379:
3377:Ballot measure
3373:
3371:
3365:
3364:
3362:
3361:
3356:
3354:Legal treatise
3351:
3350:
3349:
3344:
3334:
3333:
3332:
3322:
3320:Letters patent
3317:
3312:
3311:
3310:
3300:
3295:
3290:
3281:
3275:
3273:
3271:Sources of law
3267:
3266:
3264:
3263:
3258:
3256:Unenforced law
3253:
3248:
3243:
3238:
3233:
3228:
3223:
3218:
3213:
3208:
3203:
3202:
3201:
3196:
3186:
3181:
3176:
3171:
3166:
3161:
3156:
3151:
3146:
3141:
3136:
3131:
3126:
3121:
3116:
3111:
3106:
3101:
3096:
3091:
3086:
3081:
3075:
3070:
3065:
3060:
3055:
3050:
3045:
3040:
3035:
3030:
3028:Commercial law
3025:
3020:
3015:
3010:
3005:
3000:
2994:
2992:
2988:
2987:
2985:
2984:
2979:
2974:
2969:
2968:
2967:
2957:
2952:
2947:
2946:
2945:
2940:
2930:
2925:
2920:
2915:
2910:
2905:
2900:
2895:
2894:
2893:
2883:
2878:
2873:
2868:
2862:
2860:
2856:
2855:
2850:
2848:
2847:
2840:
2833:
2825:
2819:
2818:
2813:
2808:
2803:
2798:
2793:
2786:
2785:External links
2783:
2782:
2781:
2768:
2760:
2751:
2724:
2711:
2690:
2681:
2672:
2639:
2622:
2605:
2594:
2591:
2589:
2588:
2576:
2516:
2507:|journal=
2473:
2462:(4): 499â501.
2442:
2419:
2408:(2): 4, 8â10.
2392:
2368:
2349:
2330:
2314:
2308:
2282:
2241:
2206:
2144:
2114:10.1.1.731.755
2107:(9): 123â131.
2091:
2070:
2059:(2): 239â244.
2036:
2009:
2000:|journal=
1969:
1942:(2): 123â131.
1922:
1919:on 2011-01-14.
1863:
1826:(2): 222â234.
1806:
1787:(9): 631â642.
1771:
1712:
1707:The New Yorker
1693:
1642:
1615:(3): 196â213.
1599:
1562:(5792): 1402.
1546:
1517:
1514:on 2010-06-14.
1466:(2004-11-26).
1452:
1401:
1380:(3): 243â251.
1360:
1325:
1302:
1235:
1198:(1): 144â160.
1178:
1139:
1120:
1096:
1072:
1058:
1044:
1041:on 2011-05-14.
1026:
1023:on 2011-01-30.
1008:
999:|journal=
980:
954:
923:(4): 293â305.
907:
878:(5): 365â376.
858:
820:
811:|journal=
781:
740:
716:
654:
612:
610:
607:
606:
605:
598:
595:
564:
561:
544:proprioception
530:branch of the
503:
500:
468:
465:
459:
456:
440:intentionality
426:
423:
399:false memories
387:Main article:
384:
381:
349:
346:
328:
325:
304:
301:
279:
278:
275:
272:
269:
246:
243:
217:
214:
171:mental illness
166:
163:
142:
139:
133:
130:
107:
104:
67:
64:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4736:
4725:
4722:
4720:
4717:
4716:
4714:
4699:
4698:
4689:
4687:
4686:
4677:
4676:
4673:
4667:
4664:
4662:
4659:
4657:
4654:
4652:
4649:
4647:
4644:
4642:
4639:
4637:
4634:
4632:
4629:
4627:
4624:
4622:
4619:
4617:
4614:
4612:
4609:
4607:
4604:
4602:
4599:
4597:
4594:
4592:
4589:
4587:
4584:
4582:
4579:
4577:
4574:
4573:
4571:
4567:
4561:
4558:
4556:
4553:
4551:
4550:Neurotheology
4548:
4546:
4545:Neurorobotics
4543:
4541:
4540:Neuropolitics
4538:
4536:
4533:
4531:
4528:
4526:
4523:
4521:
4518:
4516:
4513:
4511:
4508:
4506:
4505:Neuroethology
4503:
4501:
4498:
4496:
4493:
4491:
4488:
4486:
4483:
4481:
4478:
4476:
4473:
4471:
4468:
4466:
4463:
4461:
4458:
4456:
4453:
4451:
4448:
4446:
4443:
4441:
4438:
4437:
4435:
4429:
4423:
4420:
4418:
4415:
4413:
4410:
4408:
4405:
4403:
4402:Motor control
4400:
4398:
4395:
4393:
4392:Chronobiology
4390:
4388:
4385:
4383:
4380:
4379:
4377:
4375:
4369:
4363:
4360:
4358:
4355:
4353:
4352:Neurovirology
4350:
4348:
4345:
4343:
4340:
4338:
4335:
4333:
4330:
4328:
4325:
4323:
4320:
4318:
4315:
4313:
4310:
4308:
4305:
4303:
4300:
4298:
4295:
4293:
4290:
4288:
4285:
4283:
4280:
4278:
4275:
4273:
4270:
4268:
4265:
4263:
4260:
4258:
4255:
4254:
4252:
4250:
4244:
4239:
4229:
4226:
4224:
4221:
4219:
4216:
4214:
4211:
4209:
4206:
4204:
4201:
4199:
4198:Neurogenetics
4196:
4194:
4191:
4189:
4186:
4184:
4181:
4179:
4176:
4174:
4171:
4169:
4166:
4164:
4161:
4159:
4156:
4154:
4151:
4149:
4146:
4144:
4141:
4139:
4136:
4134:
4133:Brain-reading
4131:
4129:
4128:Brain mapping
4126:
4124:
4121:
4119:
4116:
4115:
4113:
4111:
4105:
4099:
4096:
4094:
4091:
4090:
4087:
4083:
4076:
4071:
4069:
4064:
4062:
4057:
4056:
4053:
4041:
4040:
4036:
4034:
4033:
4029:
4027:
4026:
4015:
4013:
4012:
4007:
4001:
4000:
3997:
3989:
3986:
3985:
3984:
3981:
3980:
3978:
3974:
3968:
3965:
3963:
3960:
3958:
3955:
3953:
3950:
3948:
3945:
3941:
3938:
3937:
3936:
3933:
3929:
3926:
3925:
3924:
3921:
3919:
3916:
3914:
3911:
3909:
3906:
3904:
3901:
3899:
3896:
3894:
3893:Civil society
3891:
3889:
3886:
3884:
3881:
3879:
3876:
3874:
3871:
3870:
3868:
3864:
3858:
3855:
3853:
3852:Trier of fact
3850:
3848:
3845:
3843:
3840:
3838:
3835:
3833:
3830:
3826:
3823:
3821:
3818:
3816:
3813:
3811:
3808:
3806:
3803:
3801:
3798:
3796:
3793:
3792:
3791:
3788:
3786:
3783:
3781:
3778:
3776:
3773:
3771:
3768:
3766:
3763:
3759:
3756:
3754:
3751:
3750:
3749:
3746:
3744:
3741:
3739:
3738:Legal opinion
3736:
3734:
3731:
3729:
3726:
3724:
3721:
3719:
3718:Court-martial
3716:
3714:
3711:
3709:
3706:
3704:
3701:
3699:
3696:
3695:
3693:
3691:
3690:Jurisprudence
3687:
3681:
3678:
3676:
3673:
3671:
3668:
3666:
3663:
3661:
3658:
3656:
3653:
3651:
3648:
3646:
3643:
3641:
3638:
3636:
3633:
3631:
3628:
3626:
3623:
3621:
3618:
3616:
3613:
3611:
3608:
3606:
3603:
3602:
3600:
3596:
3590:
3587:
3585:
3582:
3580:
3579:Statutory law
3577:
3575:
3574:Socialist law
3572:
3568:
3567:Byzantine law
3565:
3564:
3563:
3560:
3556:
3553:
3551:
3548:
3546:
3543:
3541:
3538:
3536:
3533:
3529:
3526:
3525:
3524:
3521:
3520:
3519:
3518:Religious law
3516:
3514:
3511:
3509:
3506:
3504:
3501:
3499:
3496:
3495:
3493:
3491:
3490:Legal systems
3487:
3481:
3478:
3474:
3471:
3469:
3466:
3464:
3461:
3460:
3459:
3458:Statutory law
3456:
3452:
3449:
3448:
3447:
3444:
3442:
3439:
3437:
3434:
3432:
3429:
3425:
3422:
3420:
3417:
3415:
3412:
3411:
3410:
3407:
3403:
3400:
3398:
3395:
3393:
3390:
3389:
3388:
3385:
3383:
3380:
3378:
3375:
3374:
3372:
3370:
3366:
3360:
3357:
3355:
3352:
3348:
3345:
3343:
3340:
3339:
3338:
3335:
3331:
3328:
3327:
3326:
3323:
3321:
3318:
3316:
3313:
3309:
3306:
3305:
3304:
3301:
3299:
3296:
3294:
3291:
3289:
3288:Statutory law
3285:
3282:
3280:
3277:
3276:
3274:
3272:
3268:
3262:
3259:
3257:
3254:
3252:
3249:
3247:
3246:Transport law
3244:
3242:
3239:
3237:
3234:
3232:
3229:
3227:
3224:
3222:
3219:
3217:
3214:
3212:
3209:
3207:
3204:
3200:
3197:
3195:
3192:
3191:
3190:
3187:
3185:
3182:
3180:
3177:
3175:
3172:
3170:
3167:
3165:
3164:Legal fiction
3162:
3160:
3157:
3155:
3152:
3150:
3147:
3145:
3142:
3140:
3137:
3135:
3132:
3130:
3127:
3125:
3122:
3120:
3117:
3115:
3112:
3110:
3107:
3105:
3102:
3100:
3097:
3095:
3094:Financial law
3092:
3090:
3087:
3085:
3082:
3079:
3076:
3074:
3071:
3069:
3066:
3064:
3061:
3059:
3056:
3054:
3053:Corporate law
3051:
3049:
3046:
3044:
3041:
3039:
3036:
3034:
3031:
3029:
3026:
3024:
3021:
3019:
3016:
3014:
3011:
3009:
3006:
3004:
3001:
2999:
2996:
2995:
2993:
2989:
2983:
2980:
2978:
2977:Statutory law
2975:
2973:
2970:
2966:
2963:
2962:
2961:
2958:
2956:
2953:
2951:
2948:
2944:
2941:
2939:
2936:
2935:
2934:
2931:
2929:
2926:
2924:
2921:
2919:
2916:
2914:
2911:
2909:
2906:
2904:
2901:
2899:
2896:
2892:
2889:
2888:
2887:
2884:
2882:
2879:
2877:
2874:
2872:
2869:
2867:
2864:
2863:
2861:
2859:Core subjects
2857:
2853:
2846:
2841:
2839:
2834:
2832:
2827:
2826:
2823:
2817:
2814:
2812:
2809:
2807:
2804:
2802:
2799:
2797:
2794:
2792:
2789:
2788:
2784:
2778:
2774:
2769:
2765:
2761:
2757:
2752:
2748:
2742:
2734:
2730:
2725:
2721:
2717:
2712:
2702:
2701:
2696:
2691:
2687:
2682:
2678:
2673:
2669:
2663:
2654:
2649:
2645:
2640:
2636:
2632:
2628:
2623:
2619:
2615:
2611:
2606:
2602:
2597:
2596:
2592:
2586:
2580:
2577:
2572:
2568:
2564:
2560:
2555:
2550:
2546:
2542:
2538:
2534:
2527:
2520:
2517:
2512:
2499:
2491:
2487:
2480:
2478:
2474:
2469:
2465:
2461:
2457:
2453:
2446:
2443:
2438:
2434:
2430:
2423:
2420:
2415:
2411:
2407:
2403:
2396:
2393:
2382:
2381:www.darpa.mil
2378:
2372:
2369:
2364:
2360:
2353:
2350:
2345:
2341:
2334:
2331:
2328:
2324:
2318:
2315:
2311:
2305:
2301:
2297:
2293:
2286:
2283:
2280:
2275:
2271:
2268:(81): 14â21.
2267:
2263:
2259:
2252:
2250:
2248:
2246:
2242:
2237:
2233:
2229:
2225:
2221:
2213:
2211:
2207:
2202:
2198:
2193:
2188:
2184:
2180:
2175:
2170:
2166:
2162:
2158:
2151:
2149:
2145:
2140:
2136:
2132:
2128:
2124:
2120:
2115:
2110:
2106:
2102:
2095:
2092:
2087:
2080:
2074:
2071:
2066:
2062:
2058:
2054:
2047:
2040:
2037:
2032:
2028:
2024:
2020:
2013:
2010:
2005:
1992:
1984:
1980:
1973:
1970:
1965:
1961:
1957:
1953:
1949:
1945:
1941:
1937:
1933:
1926:
1923:
1915:
1911:
1907:
1902:
1897:
1893:
1889:
1885:
1881:
1874:
1867:
1864:
1859:
1855:
1850:
1845:
1841:
1837:
1833:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1810:
1807:
1802:
1798:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1782:
1775:
1772:
1767:
1763:
1758:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1740:
1735:
1731:
1727:
1723:
1716:
1713:
1708:
1704:
1697:
1694:
1689:
1685:
1681:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1665:
1661:
1657:
1653:
1646:
1643:
1638:
1634:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1603:
1600:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1570:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1550:
1547:
1544:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1524:
1522:
1518:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1497:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1469:
1465:
1459:
1457:
1453:
1448:
1444:
1439:
1434:
1429:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1412:
1405:
1402:
1397:
1393:
1388:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1371:
1364:
1361:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1329:
1326:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1306:
1303:
1298:
1294:
1289:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1271:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1239:
1236:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1214:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1182:
1179:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1143:
1140:
1135:
1131:
1124:
1121:
1110:
1106:
1100:
1097:
1086:
1082:
1076:
1073:
1068:
1062:
1059:
1054:
1048:
1045:
1040:
1036:
1030:
1027:
1022:
1018:
1012:
1009:
1004:
991:
983:
977:
973:
969:
965:
964:"Neuroethics"
958:
955:
950:
946:
942:
938:
930:
926:
922:
918:
911:
908:
903:
899:
895:
891:
886:
881:
877:
873:
869:
862:
859:
854:
850:
846:
842:
841:
833:
831:
829:
827:
825:
821:
816:
803:
792:
785:
782:
777:
773:
768:
763:
759:
755:
754:Iran J Neurol
751:
744:
741:
738:
734:
730:
723:
721:
717:
712:
708:
703:
698:
694:
690:
686:
682:
678:
674:
670:
663:
661:
659:
655:
650:
646:
641:
636:
632:
628:
624:
617:
614:
608:
604:
601:
600:
596:
594:
590:
586:
583:
579:
573:
571:
562:
560:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
520:
518:
514:
508:
501:
499:
497:
493:
489:
488:Mumbai, India
484:
482:
478:
474:
473:United States
466:
464:
457:
455:
452:
447:
445:
441:
436:
431:
424:
422:
418:
415:
411:
406:
402:
400:
396:
395:lie detection
390:
383:Lie detection
382:
380:
376:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
353:
347:
345:
341:
338:
334:
326:
324:
322:
318:
314:
310:
302:
300:
296:
293:
289:
285:
276:
273:
270:
267:
266:
265:
262:
260:
256:
252:
244:
242:
239:
233:
231:
227:
223:
215:
213:
210:
205:
203:
199:
194:
192:
188:
184:
183:John Hinckley
180:
176:
172:
164:
162:
158:
156:
151:
147:
140:
138:
131:
129:
127:
123:
119:
118:
113:
105:
103:
101:
97:
93:
88:
86:
80:
78:
73:
65:
63:
60:
58:
53:
51:
47:
43:
39:
35:
31:
27:
18:
4695:
4683:
4631:Neuroimaging
4626:Neurogenesis
4514:
4510:Neurohistory
4475:Neurobiotics
4374:neuroscience
4342:Neurosurgery
4267:Epileptology
4249:neuroscience
4218:Neurophysics
4208:Neurometrics
4183:Neurobiology
4178:Neuroanatomy
4148:Connectomics
4082:Neuroscience
4037:
4030:
4016:
4002:
3775:Jurisdiction
3743:Legal remedy
3698:Adjudication
3598:Legal theory
3436:Ratification
3431:Promulgation
3402:Proclamation
3382:Codification
3315:Human rights
3303:Divine right
3293:Constitution
3261:Women in law
3179:Military law
3174:Marriage law
3169:Maritime law
3068:Election law
3008:Aviation law
2998:Abortion law
2950:Property law
2886:Criminal law
2704:. Retrieved
2698:
2643:
2630:
2613:
2579:
2536:
2532:
2519:
2498:cite journal
2459:
2455:
2445:
2437:the original
2432:
2422:
2405:
2401:
2395:
2384:. Retrieved
2380:
2371:
2362:
2352:
2343:
2333:
2322:
2317:
2291:
2285:
2265:
2261:
2219:
2164:
2160:
2104:
2100:
2094:
2085:
2073:
2056:
2052:
2039:
2022:
2018:
2012:
1991:cite journal
1972:
1939:
1935:
1925:
1914:the original
1883:
1879:
1866:
1823:
1819:
1809:
1784:
1780:
1774:
1729:
1725:
1715:
1706:
1703:"Brain Gain"
1696:
1655:
1651:
1645:
1612:
1608:
1602:
1559:
1555:
1549:
1537:
1533:
1509:the original
1478:
1474:
1421:(2926): 13.
1418:
1414:
1404:
1377:
1373:
1363:
1338:
1334:
1328:
1319:
1315:
1305:
1252:
1248:
1238:
1195:
1191:
1181:
1156:
1152:
1142:
1133:
1123:
1112:. Retrieved
1108:
1099:
1088:. Retrieved
1084:
1075:
1061:
1047:
1039:the original
1029:
1021:the original
1011:
990:cite journal
957:
940:
936:
920:
916:
910:
875:
871:
861:
844:
838:
802:cite journal
784:
757:
753:
743:
733:The Atlantic
732:
676:
672:
630:
626:
616:
591:
587:
574:
566:
521:
509:
505:
485:
480:
476:
470:
467:Criminal law
461:
448:
432:
428:
419:
407:
403:
392:
377:
354:
351:
348:Neuroimaging
342:
330:
315:(PET scan),
306:
297:
280:
263:
248:
234:
230:life support
219:
206:
195:
175:Durham Rules
168:
159:
150:neuroimaging
144:
135:
115:
111:
109:
89:
81:
69:
61:
54:
34:neuroscience
30:neuroscience
25:
24:
4500:Neuroethics
4347:Neurotology
3947:Legislature
3878:Bureaucracy
3675:Rule of man
3670:Rule of law
3645:Libertarian
3508:Chinese law
3409:Legislation
3359:Regulations
3347:Law reports
3325:Natural law
3221:Reparations
3216:Refugee law
3139:Jurimetrics
3080:(Media law)
3018:Banking law
3013:Amnesty law
2991:Disciplines
2928:Private law
1540:(6): 36â40.
943:(2009â34).
760:(1): 53â8.
633:(3): 53â8.
327:Epigenetics
321:epigenetics
319:(MRI), and
226:brain death
216:Brain death
77:neuroethics
50:criminology
4713:Categories
4661:Neurotoxin
4362:Psychiatry
3940:Law school
3820:Prosecutor
3758:Magistrate
3545:Jewish law
3503:Common law
3424:Rulemaking
3419:Regulation
3369:Law making
3308:Divine law
3284:Legal code
3231:Sports law
3154:Law of war
3104:Health law
3089:Family law
3073:Energy law
3023:Bankruptcy
2960:Punishment
2955:Public law
2706:2011-03-22
2386:2019-12-01
2258:"Neurolaw"
1114:2019-12-01
1090:2019-12-01
933:See also:
679:(1): 3â5.
609:References
570:CSI effect
251:nootropics
245:Nootropics
155:recidivism
38:philosophy
4606:Neurochip
4372:Cognitive
4297:Neurology
3918:Judiciary
3913:Executive
3888:The bench
3825:Solicitor
3800:Barrister
3680:Sociology
3665:Pseudolaw
3605:Anarchist
3562:Roman law
3550:Parsi law
3535:Hindu law
3523:Canon law
3498:Civil law
3451:Concordat
3342:Precedent
3251:Trust law
3226:Space law
3063:Drugs law
2933:Procedure
2871:Civil law
2741:cite news
2662:cite news
2625:The RSA.
2571:205071132
2274:0585-0576
2236:145117821
2183:1662-5161
2109:CiteSeerX
1840:1076-8971
1801:1747-9991
1748:1662-5137
1629:1043-6618
1564:CiteSeerX
1355:148995296
1279:0027-8424
1230:247032069
1173:247300498
1055:. SciLaw.
894:1471-0048
847:: 61â92.
693:1180-4882
552:Modafinil
435:endocrine
4685:Category
4569:Concepts
4515:Neurolaw
4247:Clinical
4025:Category
3967:Tribunal
3952:Military
3795:Attorney
3765:Judgment
3625:Feminist
3540:Jain law
3337:Case law
3058:Cyberlaw
2965:Corporal
2943:Criminal
2913:Evidence
2903:Doctrine
2881:Contract
2635:Archived
2618:Archived
2563:22517146
2468:19092067
2201:24065912
2131:24588019
2065:19535562
1956:24588019
1910:18372290
1858:23772173
1766:24860437
1680:18097378
1637:18353672
1594:54524352
1586:16959998
1505:15590619
1447:32038355
1396:27002995
1297:23536303
1222:36950188
1213:10026748
1053:"SciLaw"
902:23571845
776:25874060
711:26674511
649:25874060
597:See also
556:Ampakine
528:Pentagon
515:and the
311:(fMRI),
284:Adderall
198:volition
120:. This
26:Neurolaw
4697:Commons
4110:science
4098:History
4093:Outline
4039:Outline
3976:History
3883:The bar
3857:Verdict
3805:Counsel
3785:Justice
3640:History
3463:Statute
3279:Charter
3241:Tax law
3189:Probate
2777:2881586
2733:2001085
2720:1563612
2631:YouTube
2614:YouTube
2541:Bibcode
2490:3178272
2192:3781577
2167:: 594.
2139:8480199
2031:2878876
1983:1736288
1964:8480199
1901:2583150
1849:3680134
1757:4026746
1688:2051062
1660:Bibcode
1556:Science
1496:1693445
1438:6992536
1322:: 1265.
1288:3625297
1257:Bibcode
949:1472245
767:4395810
702:4688026
640:4395810
471:In the
451:Daubert
373:impulse
292:Ritalin
66:History
4433:fields
3957:Police
3928:Agency
3810:Lawyer
3555:Sharia
3446:Treaty
3441:Repeal
3387:Decree
3298:Custom
3194:Estate
3144:Labour
2908:Equity
2775:
2731:
2718:
2569:
2561:
2533:Nature
2488:
2466:
2306:
2272:
2234:
2199:
2189:
2181:
2137:
2129:
2111:
2063:
2029:
2025:: 14.
1981:
1962:
1954:
1908:
1898:
1856:
1846:
1838:
1799:
1764:
1754:
1746:
1732:: 38.
1686:
1678:
1652:Nature
1635:
1627:
1592:
1584:
1566:
1503:
1493:
1445:
1435:
1394:
1353:
1295:
1285:
1277:
1228:
1220:
1210:
1171:
978:
947:
900:
892:
774:
764:
709:
699:
691:
647:
637:
546:, and
369:reward
365:memory
333:allele
48:, and
4108:Basic
4032:Index
3898:Court
3842:Trial
3748:Judge
3589:Yassa
3392:Edict
2938:Civil
2891:Crime
2567:S2CID
2529:(PDF)
2232:S2CID
2135:S2CID
2082:(PDF)
2049:(PDF)
1960:S2CID
1917:(PDF)
1876:(PDF)
1684:S2CID
1590:S2CID
1512:(PDF)
1471:(PDF)
1351:S2CID
1226:S2CID
1169:S2CID
794:(PDF)
524:DARPA
3780:Jury
3728:Fiqh
3584:Xeer
2982:Tort
2898:Deed
2773:SSRN
2747:link
2729:SSRN
2716:SSRN
2668:link
2559:PMID
2511:help
2486:SSRN
2464:PMID
2433:Time
2304:ISBN
2270:ISSN
2197:PMID
2179:ISSN
2127:PMID
2061:PMID
2027:SSRN
2004:help
1979:SSRN
1952:PMID
1906:PMID
1854:PMID
1836:ISSN
1797:ISSN
1762:PMID
1744:ISSN
1676:PMID
1633:PMID
1625:ISSN
1582:PMID
1501:PMID
1443:PMID
1392:PMID
1293:PMID
1275:ISSN
1218:PMID
1003:help
976:ISBN
945:SSRN
898:PMID
890:ISSN
815:help
772:PMID
707:PMID
689:ISSN
645:PMID
554:and
337:MAOA
288:ADHD
148:and
21:law.
2852:Law
2648:doi
2549:doi
2537:484
2410:doi
2296:doi
2279:PDF
2224:doi
2187:PMC
2169:doi
2119:doi
1944:doi
1896:PMC
1888:doi
1844:PMC
1828:doi
1789:doi
1752:PMC
1734:doi
1668:doi
1656:450
1617:doi
1574:doi
1560:313
1543:PDF
1491:PMC
1483:doi
1479:359
1433:PMC
1423:doi
1382:doi
1343:doi
1283:PMC
1265:doi
1253:110
1208:PMC
1200:doi
1161:doi
968:doi
925:doi
880:doi
849:doi
762:PMC
697:PMC
681:doi
635:PMC
486:In
209:PFC
4715::
3286:/
2743:}}
2739:{{
2697:.
2664:}}
2660:{{
2633:.
2629:.
2616:.
2612:.
2565:.
2557:.
2547:.
2535:.
2531:.
2502::
2500:}}
2496:{{
2476:^
2460:36
2458:.
2454:.
2431:.
2404:.
2379:.
2361:.
2342:.
2302:,
2266:44
2264:.
2260:.
2244:^
2230:.
2222:.
2209:^
2195:.
2185:.
2177:.
2163:.
2159:.
2147:^
2133:.
2125:.
2117:.
2105:15
2103:.
2084:.
2057:37
2055:.
2051:.
2023:84
2021:.
1995::
1993:}}
1989:{{
1958:.
1950:.
1940:15
1938:.
1934:.
1904:.
1894:.
1884:18
1882:.
1878:.
1852:.
1842:.
1834:.
1824:19
1822:.
1818:.
1795:.
1783:.
1760:.
1750:.
1742:.
1728:.
1724:.
1705:.
1682:.
1674:.
1666:.
1654:.
1631:.
1623:.
1613:57
1611:.
1588:.
1580:.
1572:.
1558:.
1538:16
1536:.
1532:.
1520:^
1499:.
1489:.
1477:.
1473:.
1455:^
1441:.
1431:.
1419:10
1417:.
1413:.
1390:.
1378:18
1376:.
1372:.
1349:.
1339:44
1337:.
1320:82
1318:.
1314:.
1291:.
1281:.
1273:.
1263:.
1251:.
1247:.
1224:.
1216:.
1206:.
1194:.
1190:.
1167:.
1155:.
1151:.
1132:.
1107:.
1083:.
994::
992:}}
988:{{
974:.
966:.
941:11
939:.
919:.
896:.
888:.
876:14
874:.
870:.
843:.
823:^
806::
804:}}
800:{{
770:.
758:14
756:.
752:.
731:.
719:^
705:.
695:.
687:.
677:41
675:.
671:.
657:^
643:.
629:.
625:.
542:,
401:.
371:,
367:,
323:.
232:.
193:.
44:,
40:,
36:,
4074:e
4067:t
4060:v
2844:e
2837:t
2830:v
2779:.
2766:.
2758:.
2749:)
2735:.
2722:.
2709:.
2670:)
2656:.
2650::
2573:.
2551::
2543::
2513:)
2509:(
2492:.
2470:.
2416:.
2412::
2406:6
2389:.
2365:.
2346:.
2298::
2276:.
2238:.
2226::
2203:.
2171::
2165:7
2141:.
2121::
2088:.
2067:.
2033:.
2006:)
2002:(
1985:.
1966:.
1946::
1890::
1860:.
1830::
1803:.
1791::
1785:7
1768:.
1736::
1730:8
1709:.
1690:.
1670::
1662::
1639:.
1619::
1596:.
1576::
1485::
1449:.
1425::
1398:.
1384::
1357:.
1345::
1299:.
1267::
1259::
1232:.
1202::
1196:1
1175:.
1163::
1157:1
1136:.
1117:.
1093:.
1005:)
1001:(
984:.
970::
951:.
931:.
927::
921:5
904:.
882::
855:.
851::
845:6
817:)
813:(
778:.
735:.
713:.
683::
651:.
631:1
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.