Knowledge (XXG)

Neurolaw

Source 📝

94:'s Initiative on Neuroscience and the Law, now known as the national nonprofit, called the Center for Science & Law. SciLaw, as the organization is known, seeks to leverage neuroscience, law, ethics, programming, and data science to analyze policies and develop solutions to advance the criminal justice system. Their stated goal is to 'steer social policy in an evidenced-based manner, thereby reducing rates of incarceration and providing innovative options for improving the criminal justice system in a cost effective and humane way'. The 475:, brain scan results have been increasingly utilized during the sentencing phase of trials, with the rate of cases involving neuroscience evidence doubling from 2006 to 2009. In two instances occurring in California and New York, defendants were able to reduce their sentence of first-degree murder to manslaughter using neuroimaging. Each case presented brain scans suggesting hindered neurological function hoping to mitigate their responsibility in the crime. Brain images were also used in the case of 59:(fMRI) research has led to new insights on neuroanatomical structure and function, which has led to a greater understanding of human behavior and cognition. As a response, there has been an emergence of questions regarding how these findings can be applied to criminology and legal processes. Major areas of current neurolaw research include courtroom applications, legal implications of neuroscience findings, and how neuroscience-related jurisdiction can be created and applied. 507:
enhance the focus and memories of soldiers, allowing for better recognition of dangers and improved performance. However, this has led to questions regarding the personal privacy of soldiers and detainees, and the compliance requirements that may come with performance enhancement. Although the civilian court system is reluctant to use unproven technologies, the military's future use of them may generate controversy over the possible innocence or guilt of enemy combatants.
4006: 4680: 4020: 241:
activity in specific regions of the brain. Particularly, she exhibited increased activity in the middle and superior temporal gyri similar to the way that a healthy individual would. This positive response revealed potential for medical imaging to be used to understand the implications of brain death, and to help answer legal, scientific, and ethical questions pertaining to individuals in vegetative states.
161:
empathy, decision making, and impulsivity -- without reference to race -- the group states they can build better and fairer inroads to rehabilitation. As a risk assessment, it was found to be as predictive or more so than risk assessments commonly used. Holding consistent with their mission to "advance justice", the NCRA does not collect race data making for a more fair and unbiased assessment.
550:. A current operation of DARPA is named the Preventing Sleep Deprivation Program, which conducts research on the molecular processes and changes in the brain involved with sleep deprivation, with the ultimate purpose to maximize warfighters’ cognitive abilities, even with sleep deprivation. As a result of this research, sleep deprivation prevention drugs such as 4692: 4238: 204:" as legitimate grounds for mental illness. One of the factors neurosciences have added to the insanity defense is the claim that the brain “made someone do it.” In these cases, the argument is based on the notion that individuals' decisions are made for them, before they are able to consciously realize what they are doing. 519:, address only the use of certain chemical agents and are not regulating the fast-paced evolution of recent advancements in cognitive science research. Due to this ambiguity and the potential of technology misuse, it has become increasingly pressing to address the regulations and ethics needed for neuroscience research. 212:
will lead to immediate satisfaction. It is responsible for moral reasoning, including regret. Individual variations that impair the PFC are extremely detrimental to the decision-making process and give an individual a greater likelihood in a committing a crime he or she would have otherwise not committed.
575:
Neuroscience is still not fully understood. There is not enough evidence of structural and functional relationships to be able to confidently link a brain feature to a criminal behavior or issue. This uncertainty leaves room for misuse of neuroscientific evidence in a courtroom. American professor of
420:
Future research aims to differentiate between when someone has genuinely forgotten an experience and when someone has made an active choice to withhold or fabricate information. Developing this distinction to the point of scientific validity would help discern when defendants are being truthful about
343:
Findings like this have sparked a conversation about 'neuroprediction' or using genetics and neuroimaging modalities to predict criminal behavior and assess individual risk. If the science behind prediction improves, lawmakers will need to decide the role that genetic, neuroanatomical, or neuropathic
240:
from an automobile accident. The woman was declared to be in a vegetative state; after five months she continued to be unresponsive, but brain pattern measurements indicated normal sleep and wake cycles. Using fMRI technology, researchers concluded that she was able to understand external stimuli via
592:
Although some experts recognize the possibilities and drawbacks of brain imaging, others still completely reject the field. In the future, judges must decide on the relevance and validity of neurological evidence so that it can enter the courtroom, and juries must be open to understanding scientific
588:
Lawmakers and judges are cautious due to the lack of concrete findings in neurolaw. Before making decisions on how to regulate and utilize neuroscience research in court, lawmakers and judges must consider the implications that will come with suggested changes. Neuroimaging and genetic evidence have
510:
With the advent of novel technological innovations and information in the field of neuroscience, the military has begun to anticipate specific uses for such neuroscience research. However, these approaches, which can alter human cognitive abilities as well as infringe on an individual's right to the
462:
Neurolaw techniques and policies are slowly entering the legal system due to professional and general public skepticism about its validity. Currently two companies, No Lie MRI and Cephos Corp, offer lie-detection services that utilize neuroimaging. Their services are considered to be a more advanced
453:
hearing concerning its admissibility in a criminal trial. Ultimately, the images were excluded based on doubts about neuroimaging validity. A 2012 appeal of the case failed to change the court's view of the matter. Legal professionals suggest that there are currently too many serious, open questions
160:
The Center for Science & Law has developed a suite of mobile and gamified NeuroCognitive Risk Assessments (NCRA) to help steer people to the proper post-conviction rehabilitation programs by harnessing what drives individual decision making. By understanding individual differences in aggression,
437:
function need to be considered when viewing an fMRI image, and the sensitivity of the scanner needs to be considered as well. If the person being scanned is moving or inaccurately completing assigned tasks, the images produced will be invalid. Other critics highlight that the image derived from the
404:
False memories are a barrier in validating witness testimonies. Research has shown that when presented a list of semantically related words, participant recollection can often be unintentionally false and additive of words that were not originally present. This is a normal psychological occurrence
74:
journal article analyzing the role of psychologists and lawyers in the criminal justice system. After this publication, scholars from both fields began to network through presentations and dialogs, and start to publish books, articles, and other literature about this intersection. Parallel to the
211:
is evidence that a prime factor in mental illness is disrupted volition. Many experiments using fMRI show that one of the functions of the PFC is to bias a person towards taking the more difficult action. This action is representative of a long-term reward, and it is competing with an action that
506:
The United States Military has become increasingly interested in the possibilities of neuroscience research. Brain imaging could help to distinguish between enemy combatants from those who pose no risk or determine the mental stability of their own soldiers. Nootropic drugs could also be used to
82:
The intersection of neurolaw and ethics was able to be better scrutinized by the initiation of the Law and Neuroscience Project by The MacArthur Foundation. Phase I of this project was launched in 2007 with a $ 10 million grant. The initiative sustained forty projects addressing a multitude of
567:
Public opinion of neurolaw is influenced by cultural, political, and media-related factors. Surveys show that the general public does not have a well-formed understanding of neurolaw. Approval seems to depend highly on how the topic is framed and may even vary depending on partisanship. Due to
378:
Neuroimaging modalities can also be used to analyze neuroanatomical structures in terms of size and shape. Researchers are working towards defining the characteristics of healthy, well-functioning brain structures, which may help us better understand the dysfunctions and deficits in atypical,
416:
activates when a subject presents false recognition in contrast to lying or accurately telling a truth. This indicates that there may be two separate neural pathways for lying and false memory recall. However, there are limitations to how much brain imaging can distinguish between truths and
152:
evidence offer potentially more accurate modalities for predicting human behavior. Developing these tools to be used in criminology would be beneficial particularly in determining criminal sentence length and in assessing risk for which criminals should remain in jail or be released based on
235:
Research initiatives in cognition have helped to develop an understanding of the vegetative state. Research has shown that although a person can be awake and conscious, he or she may not show any signs of awareness or recognition to external stimulation. In 2005, research was conducted on a
136:
Recently, Petoft and his colleagues introduced a newly coined term: "Criminal perception" "as an ability that makes it possible for a child to understand criminal situations and behave lawfully." The term encompasses two distinct intertwined characteristics of children mean Social and Moral
157:, but they could also show indications for the need for personal rehabilitation. In light of this information and its potential applications, the legal system seeks to create a balance between punishment and penalties based on the ability to predict additional criminal activity. 137:
Personalities. The former employs the areas of the brain which contribute to normative cognition and person perception; and the latter stems from the cognitive networks by which gut feeling, emotional awareness, and conscious deliberation are realized in a criminal situation.
281:
Scientists and ethicists have attempted to answer these questions while analyzing the overall effect on society. For example, it is largely accepted that mind-enhancing drugs are acceptable for use on patients diagnosed with cognitive disorders, as in a case of prescribing
363:(BOLD) contrast, which allows us to view the most active areas of the brain at a given moment based on blood flow. This imaging modality allows researchers to identify and understand complex neural pathways and mechanisms. Relevant mechanisms in neurolaw research are 257:. The potential to significantly improve one's concentration, memory, or cognition through drug-use has raised numerous questions on the legality of these substances, and their appropriateness in everyday life. Analogous to the controversy over the use of 584:
or no responsibility for their actions because those actions were caused by "the brain", in situations where the science could not support such causal claims. He raises the question of whether brains should be blamed for crimes, or the people behind them.
589:
the potential to be helpful in legal processes and ensure that dangerous criminals stay behind bars, but it also has the potential to be abused in a way that imprisons undeserving parties on purpose or due to negligent use of the science.
114:(1997), which was used as a resource for attorneys to properly introduce medical jargon into the courtroom and to further develop the implications of neuroscience on litigation. In this book, Taylor also explained the consequences of 298:
It is ethically questionable whether individuals who do not need nootropics should use them, and mostly unknown how continued usage could impact the brain chemistry of someone who is using nootropics for non-prescriptive reasons.
294:
have also become popular black-market drugs, most notably on college campuses. Students often use them to maintain focus when struggling to complete large amounts of schoolwork, and often become dependent on the effects produced.
52:, neurolaw practitioners seek to address not only the descriptive and predictive issues of how neuroscience is and will be used in the legal system, but also the normative issues of how neuroscience should and should not be used. 339:
gene. Preliminary research suggests that males that have this dysfunctional gene and have experienced childhood abuse are several hundred times more likely to commit a violent crime than those with normal MAOA gene expression.
463:
form of a polygraph test but are rarely accepted as evidence in the courtroom. Use of neuroimaging evidence for structural and functional analysis varies greatly by geographic region and cultural acceptance of the modality.
572:". It is possible that some people have a false understanding of forensic science based on inaccurate portrayals. This could lead to them having a stronger opinion about technological evidence or neurolaw initiatives. 189:, which asserted that unless one was able to prove that a mental illness kept him or her from knowing that their actions were wrong, or knowing the disposition of the criminal act, one would not be able to be tried as 429:
The use of neuroimaging in the legal system creates a very divided audience. Many argue for its potential, while others argue it will not accurately replace human investigation of criminal decision-making processes.
2217:
Francis X. Shen; Dena M. Gromet (2015-02-08). "Red States, Blue States, and Brain States: Issue Framing, Partisanship, and the Future of Neurolaw in the United States - Francis X. Shen, Dena M. Gromet, 2015".
494:, including a brain scan that suggested her guilt. This conviction was sharply criticized by Hank Greely, a professor of law at Stanford University. Greely contested the scan based on evidence produced by a 442:. Functional neuroimaging was not intended to calculate volition, and while it may offer insight into the processes that cause behavior, it is debated whether or not the images can objectively narrow in on 558:
CX717 have increased in significance. However, because these chemical drugs directly affect natural chemical reactions and receptors in the body, the ethics of their use as well as safety are in question.
20:
An example of an fMRI brain scan. fMRI BOLD outputs (yellow) are overlaid on a brain anatomy image (gray) averaged from several humans. Similar images are used in a variety of applications, now including
83:
issues, including experimental and theoretical data that will provide further evidence as to how neuroscience may eventually shape the law. The Gruter Institute for Law and Behavioral Research and the
490:, the legal system has taken a more rapid approach in applying neuroscience and has already incorporated it into criminal convictions. In 2008, an Indian woman was convicted of murder based on strong 62:
Despite the growing interest in neurolaw and its potential applications, the legal realm recognizes the substantial opportunity for misuse and is proceeding cautiously with novel research outcomes.
1607:
Lanni, Cristina; Silvia C. Lenzken; Alessia Pascale; Igor Del Vecchio; Marco Racchi; Francesca Pistoia; Stefano Govoni (Mar 2008). "Cognition enhancers between treating and doping the mind".
185:
was acquitted due to insanity in 1982, a reversal of this opinion occurred, which spurred a narrowing definition of mental illness. Insanity decisions became increasingly based on the
2727:
Jones, Owen, & Francis X. Shen (2012). "Law and Neuroscience in the United States". International Neurolaw: A Comparative Analysis, p. 349, T.M. Spranger, ed. Springer-Verlag.
498:
test (BEOSP). No scientific peer-review studies had ever been published demonstrating the efficacy of BEOS, raising questions about its reliability in such an important decision.
307:
Neurolaw advancements depend on state-of-the-art medical technology and grant-funded research. Among the most prominent technologies and disciplines used in neurolaw research are
417:
deceptions because these regions are common areas of executive control function; It is difficult to tell if the activation seen is due to the lie told, or something unrelated.
4718: 2099:
Farah, Martha J.; Hutchinson, Benjamin; Phelps, Elizabeth A.; Wagner, Anthony D. (20 January 2014). "Functional MRI-based lie detection: scientific and societal challenges".
128:, which sets rules regarding the use of scientific evidence in the courtroom. This standard governs the way that neuroscience evidence can be presented during a court case. 483:, the brain images were solely shown to the judge and not a jury panel, reducing the ability of this case to be used as precedent for utilizing brain imaging as evidence. 446:
and specific thought processes. These factors make neuroimaging results hard to assess precisely, which is why there is hesitation towards presenting them in court cases.
331:
Current research is exploring how genetic analysis can be used to assess risk and predict atypical behaviors. Studies have shown links between violent behaviors and a low
253:, or mind-enhancing drugs. Current research suggests that the future may hold powerful medications that can specifically target and alter brain function by bypassing the 1467: 2746: 2667: 495: 17: 4600: 433:
Even considering recent research findings, neuroimaging is still inadequately understood. Additional medical factors like age, medication history, diet, and
98:’s Center for Neuroscience and Society began in July 2009, and is working towards confronting the social, legal, and ethical inferences of neuroscience. 261:
in professional sports, many high schools and universities are wary of students eventually using nootropics to artificially boost academic performance.
1243:
Aharoni, Eyal; Vincent, Gina M.; Harenski, Carla L.; Calhoun, Vince D.; Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter; Gazzaniga, Michael S.; Kiehl, Kent A. (2013-04-09).
580:
described the abuse of neuroscience in courtrooms with a pseudo-disease he called "brain overclaim syndrome". He comments on the idea of people having
3987: 866:
Button, Katherine S.; Ioannidis, John P. A.; Mokrysz, Claire; Nosek, Brian A.; Flint, Jonathan; Robinson, Emma S. J.; Munafò, Marcus R. (May 2013).
1333:
Ormachea, P.A.; Lovins, B.K.; Eagleman, D.M.; Davenport, S.; Jarman, A. (2017). "The role of tablet-based psychological tasks in risk assessment".
839: 207:
Further research on control and inhibition mechanisms will allow for further modifications to the insanity defense. Impaired functioning of the
4072: 1872: 116: 2714:
Jones, Owen; et al. (2009). "Brain Imaging for Legal Thinkers: A Guide for the Perplexed". Vol. 5. Stanford Technology Law Review.
2525: 2307: 979: 512: 308: 56: 2428: 1722:"Performance enhancement at the cost of potential brain plasticity: neural ramifications of nootropic drugs in the healthy developing brain" 963: 360: 352:
Understanding structural and mechanistic neural dysfunction in criminals can help to determine motives and define criminal responsibility.
228:. From the exterior, it is a difficult to know when a patient is beyond hope for recovery, as well as to decide who has the right to end 1411:"Assessing Risk Among Correctional Community Probation Populations: Predicting Reoffense With Mobile Neurocognitive Assessment Software" 531: 274:
How does society distinguish between what is an acceptable substance (e.g., caffeine) and an unacceptable substance to alter one's mind?
110:
A few important sources have shaped the way that neuroscience is currently used in the courtroom. Primarily, J. Sherrod Taylor's book,
2290:
Jones, Owen D.; Jones, Owen D.; Shen, Francis X. (2012), Spranger, Tade Matthias (ed.), "Law and Neuroscience in the United States",
4580: 3413: 2971: 2870: 1311: 3527: 3396: 538:
in 2013, DARPA began to support this initiative through a number of programs involving under-researched neuroscience topics like
169:
The tendency of the United States criminal justice system has been to limit the degree to which one can claim innocence based on
2771:
Wagner, Anthony; et al. (2016). "fMRI and Lie Detection". "MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Law and Neuroscience".
3982: 3329: 3230: 1508: 3489: 3123: 2278: 409: 1977:
Shen, Francis X.; Jones, Owen D. (2011-02-23). "Brain Scans as Evidence: Truths, Proofs, Lies, and Lessons". Rochester, NY.
1779:
Nadelhoffer, Thomas; Sinnott‐Armstrong, Walter (2012-09-01). "Neurolaw and Neuroprediction: Potential Promises and Perils".
2805: 1016: 4421: 2842: 2642:
Ienca, Marcello, & Roberto Andorno (2017). "Towards New Human Rights in the Age of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology".
344:
predictions can play in legal decisions for risk assessment, particularly when a criminal is being sentenced or released.
4575: 2484:
Jones, Owen D.; Wagner, Anthony D. (2018-04-01). "Law and Neuroscience: Progress, Promise, and Pitfalls". Rochester, NY.
622: 534:, is responsible for significant amount of military research and development of technology. With the announcement of the 4396: 3649: 3128: 312: 1370:"Enabling Individualized Criminal Sentencing While Reducing Subjectivity: A Tablet-Based Assessment of Recidivism Risk" 4615: 3644: 516: 221: 196:
Contemporary research conducted on the prefrontal cortex has criticized this standpoint because it considers impaired
121: 1702: 1542: 511:
privacy of his or her own thoughts, are still innovatory and early in development. Present day treaties, such as the
623:"A Historical Overview of Law and Neuroscience: From the Emergence of Medico-Legal Discourses to Developed Neurolaw" 568:
glorified depictions of forensics labs on popular television shows, brain imaging has faced criticism for having a "
4142: 4065: 3619: 3118: 539: 316: 95: 91: 2600: 4610: 4585: 4454: 3702: 581: 71: 408:
fMRI imaging is also being used to analyze brain activity during intentional lies. Findings have shown that the
87:
are some of the prominent institutions that receive grants and conduct neurolaw research under this initiative.
4723: 4549: 4524: 4449: 4356: 4261: 4157: 3497: 3479: 3148: 254: 4696: 837:
Goodenough, Oliver R. and Macaela Tucker; Tucker, Micaela (December 2010). "Law and Cognitive Neuroscience".
737: 728: 4386: 4097: 4092: 3872: 3659: 3133: 2699: 2376: 491: 1188:"Toward children's cognitive development from the perspective of neurolaw: implications of Roper v Simmons" 1080: 16: 4381: 4371: 4281: 4162: 4117: 3927: 3912: 2583:
Morse, S. (2006). Brain Overclaim Syndrome and Criminal Responsibility: A Diagnostic Note. Retrieved from
2108: 1563: 237: 177:
and the American Law Institute Model Penal Code, regarded impaired volition as legitimate grounds for the
45: 1034: 4684: 4444: 4439: 4246: 4137: 4058: 4031: 3624: 3302: 3113: 2497: 1990: 1129: 989: 801: 197: 145: 99: 1104: 915:
Taylor, J. Sherrod; J. Anderson Harp; Tyron Elliott (Oct 1991). "Neuropsychologists and Neurolawyers".
4665: 4416: 4256: 4227: 4122: 3752: 3098: 2540: 1659: 1568: 1256: 364: 201: 2400:
Clancy, Frank (2006-01-17). "At Military's Behest, Darpa Uses Neuroscience To Harness Brain Power".
1913: 186: 4559: 4459: 4336: 4306: 4291: 3907: 3047: 2964: 2113: 336: 449:
Controversy over the science behind fMRI lie detection entered a federal courtroom in 2010 with a
153:
prediction of future offenses. Not only could the adaptation of these tools aid in the process of
4635: 4529: 4469: 4192: 4172: 3722: 3381: 3235: 3220: 3198: 2942: 2922: 2875: 2865: 2740: 2661: 2634: 2617: 2566: 2436: 2231: 2134: 1959: 1683: 1589: 1386: 1369: 1350: 1225: 1168: 749: 397:, particularly in identifying the regions of the brain involved in truth telling, deception, and 388: 2810: 2694: 2079:"Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee at Jackson" 2078: 1148: 4554: 4489: 4464: 4316: 4276: 3707: 3629: 3467: 3210: 3205: 3158: 3083: 3077: 2917: 2835: 2776: 2772: 2732: 2728: 2719: 2715: 2558: 2489: 2485: 2463: 2303: 2269: 2196: 2178: 2126: 2060: 2030: 2026: 1982: 1978: 1951: 1905: 1853: 1835: 1796: 1761: 1743: 1675: 1632: 1624: 1581: 1500: 1442: 1391: 1292: 1274: 1217: 975: 948: 944: 897: 889: 771: 706: 688: 644: 602: 258: 208: 190: 41: 2676: 4595: 4479: 4406: 4321: 4202: 4152: 3712: 3679: 3178: 3042: 3037: 3002: 2647: 2548: 2409: 2295: 2223: 2186: 2168: 2118: 1943: 1895: 1887: 1843: 1827: 1788: 1751: 1733: 1667: 1616: 1573: 1490: 1482: 1432: 1422: 1381: 1342: 1282: 1264: 1207: 1199: 1160: 971: 967: 924: 879: 852: 848: 761: 696: 680: 634: 577: 535: 434: 178: 125: 2257: 4655: 4650: 4645: 4640: 4534: 4474: 4411: 4326: 4286: 4271: 4222: 4212: 4167: 3961: 3934: 3922: 3902: 3836: 3831: 3814: 3794: 3789: 3769: 3634: 3614: 3609: 3512: 3472: 3183: 3108: 3032: 3017: 2937: 2510: 2003: 1463: 1409:
Haarsma, G.; Davenport, S.; White, D.C.; Ormachea, P.A.; Sheena, E.; Eagleman, D. (2020).
1002: 814: 547: 405:
but presents numerous problems to a jury when attempting to sort out the facts of a case.
271:
Will it become necessary to use an enhancing drug simply to remain competitive in society?
84: 1930:
Farah, Martha; Hutchinson, J. Benjamin; Phelps, Elizabeth; Wagner, Anthony (2014-01-01).
2544: 1663: 1260: 1212: 1187: 4620: 4590: 4519: 4494: 4484: 4331: 4311: 4301: 4187: 4107: 4038: 3846: 3764: 3353: 3319: 3270: 3255: 3027: 2932: 2912: 2902: 2358: 2191: 2156: 1900: 1848: 1816:"Using Brain Imaging for Lie Detection: Where Science, Law and Research Policy Collide" 1815: 1756: 1721: 1495: 1437: 1410: 1287: 1244: 766: 701: 668: 639: 543: 439: 170: 1529: 4712: 4544: 4539: 4504: 4401: 4391: 4351: 4197: 4132: 4127: 3892: 3851: 3737: 3717: 3689: 3639: 3604: 3578: 3573: 3566: 3517: 3457: 3297: 3287: 3245: 3168: 3163: 3093: 3052: 2976: 2570: 2413: 2326: 2235: 1792: 1354: 1229: 1172: 472: 394: 368: 356: 277:
Do people have the right to experiment with substances to modify their own cognition?
182: 2339: 1931: 1593: 4630: 4625: 4509: 4341: 4266: 4217: 4207: 4182: 4177: 4147: 4081: 4024: 3774: 3742: 3697: 3435: 3430: 3401: 3314: 3292: 3260: 3193: 3173: 3067: 3007: 2997: 2949: 2907: 2885: 2828: 2138: 1963: 1687: 527: 398: 229: 224:
have come to the forefront of many ethical, legal, and scientific issues regarding
149: 33: 29: 2755: 2584: 1650:
Sahakian, Barbara; Sharon Morein-Zamir (2007-12-20). "Professor's little helper".
1203: 1081:"Dual Degree Programs | Prospective Students | Law School | Vanderbilt University" 28:
is a field of interdisciplinary study that explores the effects of discoveries in
2451: 2299: 868:"Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience" 4499: 4346: 4005: 3946: 3887: 3877: 3674: 3669: 3507: 3408: 3324: 3283: 3250: 3215: 3138: 3062: 3012: 2927: 2045: 1020: 522:
Another area of interest to the military is the use of human enhancement drugs.
413: 372: 320: 225: 174: 76: 49: 2321:
Church, D. J. (2012). Neuroscience in the Courtroom: An International Concern.
1620: 1554:
Owen; et al. (2006-09-08). "Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State".
1164: 268:
How will these enhancers affect performance gaps between family income classes?
4660: 4361: 4010: 3939: 3819: 3757: 3502: 3423: 3418: 3376: 3358: 3346: 3307: 3153: 3143: 3103: 3088: 3072: 3022: 2959: 2954: 2652: 2626: 2609: 1368:
Ormachea, P.A.; Davenport, S.; Haarsma, G.; Jarman, A.; Henderson, H. (2016).
928: 569: 250: 154: 37: 2273: 2227: 2182: 2173: 1839: 1800: 1747: 1738: 1628: 1427: 1346: 1278: 893: 692: 421:
their actions and when witnesses are being truthful about their experiences.
4605: 4296: 3917: 3882: 3824: 3799: 3664: 3561: 3549: 3534: 3522: 3450: 3368: 3341: 3225: 1891: 1577: 1269: 551: 2795: 2763: 2562: 2467: 2200: 2130: 2064: 1955: 1909: 1857: 1765: 1679: 1636: 1585: 1504: 1486: 1446: 1395: 1296: 1221: 901: 775: 710: 648: 454:
about the suitability of neuroimaging for legal or other high stakes uses.
2796:
The MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Law and Neuroscience homepage
2017:
Kuersten, Andreas (2016). "When a Picture is Not Worth a Thousand Words".
3966: 3951: 3654: 3539: 3336: 2880: 555: 412:
activates when subjects are pretending to know information, but that the
355:
fMRI is particularly important because it allows for detailed functional
283: 1932:"Functional MRI-Based Lie Detection: Scientific and Societal Challenges" 90:
Neurolaw has also piqued the interests of several universities, such as
3856: 3804: 3784: 3732: 3544: 3462: 3278: 3240: 3188: 2815: 684: 450: 291: 2800: 264:
Some of the questions raised regarding the use of nootropics include:
70:
The term neurolaw was first coined by J. Sherrod Taylor in 1991, in a
3956: 3809: 3554: 3445: 3440: 3386: 3057: 2685: 1831: 1671: 790: 487: 443: 332: 2553: 2157:"Prospects of functional magnetic resonance imaging as lie detector" 2122: 1947: 884: 867: 593:
concepts but not be too willing to place all faith in neuroscience.
200:
as a factor. Many researchers and courts are beginning to consider "
4237: 669:"Neurolaw: recognizing opportunities and challenges for psychiatry" 393:
There is potential to use fMRI evidence as a more advanced form of
3897: 3841: 3747: 3588: 3391: 2890: 2688:. International Journal of Public Mental Health and Neurosciences. 2220:
The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
796:. International Journal of Public Mental Health and Neurosciences. 523: 15: 2686:"Toward Human Behavior Sciences from the Perspective of Neurolaw" 791:"Toward Human Behavior Sciences from the Perspective of Neurolaw" 173:. During the middle of the 20th century many courts, through the 3779: 3727: 3583: 2981: 2897: 2340:"A Pentagon Agency Is Looking at Brains -- And Raising Eyebrows" 1066: 287: 4054: 4050: 2824: 1873:"Neural Correlates of True Memory, False Memory, and Deception" 2851: 1105:"A Vanderbilt First - Vanderbilt Lawyer (Volume 40, Number 1)" 1038: 102:
created the first dual J.D./PhD in the United States in 2010.
479:
in 2003 as evidence for the defense. However, in the case of
1814:
Langleben, Daniel D.; Moriarty, Jane Campbell (2013-05-01).
2456:
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
2053:
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
2155:
Rusconi, Elena; Mitchener-Nissen, Timothy (2013-09-24).
1312:"Neuroimaging and the Complexity of Capital Punishment" 1149:"Children's Criminal Perception; Lessons from Neurolaw" 1130:"Book Review: Neurolaw: Brain and Spinal Cord Injuries" 2820: 2429:"Safety Concerns Raised Over Popular Wakefulness Drug" 249:
Neurolaw also encompasses ethical questions regarding
2790: 2357:
Huang, Jonathan Y.; Margaret E. Kosal (2008-06-20).
2086:
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1468:"The frontal cortex and the criminal justice system" 1052: 1019:. The Law & Neuroscience Project. Archived from 4568: 4430: 4370: 4245: 4106: 3975: 3865: 3688: 3597: 3488: 3367: 3269: 2990: 2858: 2610:"Neuroscience and the Legal System: David Eagleman" 2327:http://www.antoniocasella.eu/dnlaw/Church_2012.pdf 937:Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 2811:NPR: Jeffrey Rosen on 'Neurolaw' in the Courtroom 935:Erickson, Steven K. (2010). "Blaming the Brain". 2294:, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 349–380, 2046:"Neuroimaging, Culture, and Forensic Psychiatry" 1128:Juliano, Elizabeth; James R. Fell (April 1998). 496:Brain Electrical Oscillation Signature Profiling 2585:http://repository.upenn.edu/neuroethics_pubs/28 1720:Urban, Kimberly R.; Gao, Wen-Jun (2014-05-13). 1523: 1521: 1249:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 526:(Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), a 2292:International Neurolaw: A Comparative Analysis 2150: 2148: 4066: 2836: 8: 4601:Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring 2745:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 2666:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 1387:10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.3.stas1-1603 1037:. Baylor College of Medicine. Archived from 832: 830: 828: 826: 824: 1458: 1456: 32:on legal rules and standards. Drawing from 4719:Interdisciplinary branches of neuroscience 4073: 4059: 4051: 2843: 2829: 2821: 2452:"Commentary: Functional MRI Lie Detection" 2359:"The security impact of the neurosciences" 722: 720: 2651: 2552: 2190: 2172: 2112: 1899: 1847: 1755: 1737: 1567: 1494: 1436: 1426: 1385: 1286: 1268: 1211: 883: 765: 700: 638: 3988:History of the American legal profession 2627:"David Eagleman - The Brain and The Law" 2526:"Science in court: Arrested development" 673:Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience 438:technology does not display the brain's 2251: 2249: 2247: 2245: 1528:Eagleman, David M. (March–April 2008). 853:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131523 840:Annual Review of Law and Social Science 727:Eagleman, David M. (July–August 2011). 613: 75:expansion of neurolaw, an emergence of 2738: 2659: 2506: 2495: 1999: 1988: 998: 987: 810: 799: 124:case resulted in what is now known as 117:Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals 112:Neurolaw: Brain and Spinal Cord Injury 2603:. No. July/August. The Atlantic. 2479: 2477: 2212: 2210: 2019:George Washington Law Review Arguendo 1067:"Center for Neuroscience and Society" 972:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935314.013.45 309:functional magnetic resonance imaging 220:Injuries or illnesses that lead to a 57:functional magnetic resonance imaging 7: 4691: 2325:, 53(5), 1825–1854. Retrieved from 1245:"Neuroprediction of future rearrest" 662: 660: 658: 2816:Law and Neuroscience Email Listserv 2764:"Law and Neuroscience Bibliography" 532:United States Department of Defense 2801:Law and Neuroscience at Vanderbilt 2608:The Lavin Agency Speakers Bureau. 1820:Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 14: 4581:Development of the nervous system 2972:Restitution and unjust enrichment 2644:Life Sciences, Society and Policy 2363:Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 1726:Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 4690: 4679: 4678: 4236: 4019: 4018: 4004: 2677:"Neurolaw: a brief introduction" 2637:from the original on 2021-12-15. 2620:from the original on 2021-12-15. 2414:10.1097/00132985-200601170-00004 2377:"DARPA and the Brain Initiative" 1793:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00494.x 962:Morse, Stephen J. (2017-02-06). 750:"Neurolaw: a brief introduction" 513:U.N. Declaration of Human Rights 236:23-year-old female who suffered 3983:History of the legal profession 2806:Neurolaw: The Scales of Justice 2756:"Law and Neuroscience Casebook" 2679:. Iranian Journal of Neurology. 2161:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 1871:Abe, Nobuhito (December 2008). 1701:Talbot, Margaret (2009-04-27). 2427:Kluger, Jeffrey (2009-03-17). 1316:New York University Law Review 1192:Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 410:dorsolateral prefrontal cortex 1: 4422:Social cognitive neuroscience 2693:Rosen, Jeffrey (2007-03-11). 2450:Merikangas, James R. (2008). 2338:Begley, Sharon (2006-12-15). 2323:William & Mary Law Review 1335:Criminal Justice and Behavior 1204:10.1080/13218719.2021.2003267 1069:. University of Pennsylvania. 4397:Molecular cellular cognition 2646:. Vol. 13, no. 5. 2300:10.1007/978-3-642-21541-4_19 1475:Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 517:Chemical Weapons Conventions 361:blood oxygen level dependent 313:positron emission tomography 286:to children and adults with 4616:Neurodevelopmental disorder 4591:Neural network (biological) 4586:Neural network (artificial) 2524:Buchen, L (18 April 2012). 2256:Chen, Ingfei (2009-10-21). 2101:Nature Reviews Neuroscience 1936:Nature Reviews Neuroscience 872:Nature Reviews Neuroscience 481:Harrington v. State of Iowa 477:Harrington v. State of Iowa 222:persistent vegetative state 122:United States Supreme Court 4740: 4143:Computational neuroscience 3650:International legal theory 3129:International slavery laws 3124:International human rights 3119:International criminal law 2044:Aggarwal, Neil K. (2009). 1621:10.1016/j.phrs.2008.02.004 1530:"Neuroscience and the Law" 1165:10.1007/s12187-022-09928-2 414:right anterior hippocampus 386: 357:mapping of the human brain 317:magnetic resonance imaging 96:University of Pennsylvania 92:Baylor College of Medicine 4674: 4611:Neurodegenerative disease 4455:Evolutionary neuroscience 4234: 4088: 3998: 3703:Administration of justice 2791:Center of Science and Law 2754:Jones, Owen; et al. 2653:10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1 1310:Snead, O. Carter (2007). 1153:Child Indicators Research 1035:"Goals of the Initiative" 929:10.1037/0894-4105.5.4.293 582:diminished responsibility 4576:Brain–computer interface 4525:Neuromorphic engineering 4450:Educational neuroscience 4357:Nutritional neuroscience 4262:Clinical neurophysiology 4158:Integrative neuroscience 3480:Basic structure doctrine 3330:Natural and legal rights 3211:Public international law 2695:"The Brain on the Stand" 2599:Eagleman, David (2011). 2228:10.1177/0002716214555693 2174:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00594 1739:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00038 1609:Pharmacological Research 1428:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02926 1347:10.1177/0093854817714018 375:, and deceit circuitry. 290:. However, Adderall and 4387:Behavioral neuroscience 3660:Principle of typicality 3134:International trade law 2700:New York Times Magazine 2344:The Wall Street Journal 1578:10.1126/science.1130197 1415:Frontiers in Psychology 1270:10.1073/pnas.1219302110 667:Meynen, Gerben (2019). 502:Government and military 492:circumstantial evidence 458:Application in practice 425:Neuroimaging criticisms 4382:Affective neuroscience 4163:Molecular neuroscience 4118:Behavioral epigenetics 2684:Petoft, Arian (2015). 2675:Petoft, Arian (2015). 2505:Cite journal requires 1998:Cite journal requires 1487:10.1098/rstb.2004.1547 1186:Petoft, Arian (2022). 1147:Petoft, Arian (2022). 997:Cite journal requires 809:Cite journal requires 789:Petoft, Arian (2015). 748:Petoft, Arian (2015). 621:Petoft, Arian (2019). 238:traumatic brain injury 46:cognitive neuroscience 22: 4445:Cultural neuroscience 4440:Consumer neuroscience 4282:Neurogastroenterology 4138:Cellular neuroscience 3655:Principle of legality 3414:Delegated legislation 3114:Intellectual property 1892:10.1093/cercor/bhn037 1374:AMA Journal of Ethics 563:Cautions and concerns 100:Vanderbilt University 19: 4417:Sensory neuroscience 4257:Behavioral neurology 4228:Systems neuroscience 3873:Barristers' chambers 3815:Legal representation 3753:Justice of the peace 3099:Financial regulation 2601:"The Brain on Trial" 729:"The Brain on Trial" 202:irresistible impulse 55:The rapid growth of 4560:Social neuroscience 4460:Global neurosurgery 4337:Neurorehabilitation 4307:Neuro-ophthalmology 4292:Neurointensive care 4123:Behavioral genetics 3908:Election commission 3620:Expressive function 3149:Landlord–tenant law 3048:Consumer protection 2545:2012Natur.484..304B 1664:2007Natur.450.1157S 1658:(7173): 1157–1159. 1481:(1451): 1787–1796. 1464:Sapolsky, Robert M. 1261:2013PNAS..110.6223A 576:law and psychology 255:blood brain barrier 132:Criminal perception 4636:Neuroimmune system 4530:Neurophenomenology 4470:Neural engineering 4193:Neuroendocrinology 4173:Neural engineering 3866:Legal institutions 3733:Lawsuit/Litigation 3723:Dispute resolution 3528:Catholic canon law 3236:State of emergency 3199:Will and testament 2923:Law of obligations 2876:Constitutional law 2866:Administrative law 2439:on March 18, 2009. 1781:Philosophy Compass 1534:The Houston Lawyer 1109:law.vanderbilt.edu 1085:law.vanderbilt.edu 1017:"History: Phase I" 685:10.1503/jpn.150317 389:FMRI lie detection 146:Behavioral testing 23: 4706: 4705: 4555:Paleoneurobiology 4490:Neuroepistemology 4465:Neuroanthropology 4431:Interdisciplinary 4317:Neuropharmacology 4277:Neuroepidemiology 4048: 4047: 3708:Constitutionalism 3630:Law and economics 3468:Act of parliament 3206:Product liability 3159:Legal archaeology 3084:Environmental law 3078:Entertainment law 2918:International law 2309:978-3-642-21541-4 1886:(12): 2811–2819. 1255:(15): 6223–6228. 981:978-0-19-993531-4 603:Cognitive liberty 379:criminal brains. 259:anabolic steroids 191:criminally insane 42:social psychology 4731: 4694: 4693: 4682: 4681: 4596:Detection theory 4480:Neurocriminology 4407:Neurolinguistics 4322:Neuroprosthetics 4240: 4203:Neuroinformatics 4153:Imaging genetics 4075: 4068: 4061: 4052: 4023: 4022: 4021: 4009: 4008: 3832:Question of fact 3713:Criminal justice 3043:Construction law 3038:Conflict of laws 3003:Agricultural law 2845: 2838: 2831: 2822: 2780: 2767: 2759: 2750: 2744: 2736: 2723: 2710: 2708: 2707: 2689: 2680: 2671: 2665: 2657: 2655: 2638: 2621: 2604: 2587: 2581: 2575: 2574: 2556: 2530: 2521: 2515: 2514: 2508: 2503: 2501: 2493: 2481: 2472: 2471: 2447: 2441: 2440: 2435:. Archived from 2424: 2418: 2417: 2397: 2391: 2390: 2388: 2387: 2373: 2367: 2366: 2354: 2348: 2347: 2335: 2329: 2319: 2313: 2312: 2287: 2281: 2277: 2253: 2240: 2239: 2214: 2205: 2204: 2194: 2176: 2152: 2143: 2142: 2116: 2096: 2090: 2089: 2083: 2075: 2069: 2068: 2050: 2041: 2035: 2034: 2014: 2008: 2007: 2001: 1996: 1994: 1986: 1974: 1968: 1967: 1927: 1921: 1920: 1918: 1912:. Archived from 1903: 1877: 1868: 1862: 1861: 1851: 1832:10.1037/a0028841 1811: 1805: 1804: 1776: 1770: 1769: 1759: 1741: 1717: 1711: 1710: 1698: 1692: 1691: 1672:10.1038/4501157a 1647: 1641: 1640: 1604: 1598: 1597: 1571: 1569:10.1.1.1022.2193 1551: 1545: 1541: 1525: 1516: 1515: 1513: 1507:. Archived from 1498: 1472: 1460: 1451: 1450: 1440: 1430: 1406: 1400: 1399: 1389: 1365: 1359: 1358: 1330: 1324: 1323: 1307: 1301: 1300: 1290: 1272: 1240: 1234: 1233: 1215: 1183: 1177: 1176: 1159:(1): 1905–1920. 1144: 1138: 1137: 1134:The MIM Reporter 1125: 1119: 1118: 1116: 1115: 1101: 1095: 1094: 1092: 1091: 1077: 1071: 1070: 1063: 1057: 1056: 1049: 1043: 1042: 1031: 1025: 1024: 1013: 1007: 1006: 1000: 995: 993: 985: 959: 953: 952: 932: 912: 906: 905: 887: 863: 857: 856: 834: 819: 818: 812: 807: 805: 797: 795: 786: 780: 779: 769: 745: 739: 736: 724: 715: 714: 704: 664: 653: 652: 642: 618: 578:Stephen J. Morse 536:BRAIN Initiative 359:. fMRI measures 303:Current research 181:. However, when 179:insanity defense 165:Insanity defense 141:Crime prediction 126:Daubert Standard 106:Neurocriminology 79:was developing. 4739: 4738: 4734: 4733: 4732: 4730: 4729: 4728: 4724:Science and law 4709: 4708: 4707: 4702: 4670: 4656:Neurotechnology 4651:Neuroplasticity 4646:Neuromodulation 4641:Neuromanagement 4564: 4535:Neurophilosophy 4432: 4426: 4412:Neuropsychology 4373: 4366: 4327:Neuropsychiatry 4287:Neuroimmunology 4272:Neurocardiology 4248: 4241: 4232: 4223:Neurophysiology 4213:Neuromorphology 4168:Neural decoding 4109: 4102: 4084: 4079: 4049: 4044: 4017: 4003: 3994: 3971: 3962:Political party 3935:Legal education 3923:Law enforcement 3903:Court of equity 3861: 3837:Question of law 3790:Practice of law 3770:Judicial review 3684: 3635:Legal formalism 3615:Comparative law 3610:Contract theory 3593: 3513:Legal pluralism 3484: 3473:Act of Congress 3397:Executive order 3363: 3265: 3184:Nationality law 3109:Immigration law 3033:Competition law 2986: 2854: 2849: 2787: 2770: 2762: 2753: 2737: 2726: 2713: 2705: 2703: 2692: 2683: 2674: 2658: 2641: 2624: 2607: 2598: 2595: 2593:Further reading 2590: 2582: 2578: 2554:10.1038/484304a 2539:(7394): 304–6. 2528: 2523: 2522: 2518: 2504: 2494: 2483: 2482: 2475: 2449: 2448: 2444: 2426: 2425: 2421: 2402:Neurology Today 2399: 2398: 2394: 2385: 2383: 2375: 2374: 2370: 2356: 2355: 2351: 2337: 2336: 2332: 2320: 2316: 2310: 2289: 2288: 2284: 2262:Stanford Lawyer 2255: 2254: 2243: 2216: 2215: 2208: 2154: 2153: 2146: 2123:10.1038/nrn3665 2098: 2097: 2093: 2081: 2077: 2076: 2072: 2048: 2043: 2042: 2038: 2016: 2015: 2011: 1997: 1987: 1976: 1975: 1971: 1948:10.1038/nrn3665 1929: 1928: 1924: 1916: 1880:Cerebral Cortex 1875: 1870: 1869: 1865: 1813: 1812: 1808: 1778: 1777: 1773: 1719: 1718: 1714: 1700: 1699: 1695: 1649: 1648: 1644: 1606: 1605: 1601: 1553: 1552: 1548: 1527: 1526: 1519: 1511: 1470: 1462: 1461: 1454: 1408: 1407: 1403: 1367: 1366: 1362: 1341:(8): 993–1008. 1332: 1331: 1327: 1309: 1308: 1304: 1242: 1241: 1237: 1185: 1184: 1180: 1146: 1145: 1141: 1127: 1126: 1122: 1113: 1111: 1103: 1102: 1098: 1089: 1087: 1079: 1078: 1074: 1065: 1064: 1060: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1033: 1032: 1028: 1015: 1014: 1010: 996: 986: 982: 961: 960: 956: 934: 917:Neuropsychology 914: 913: 909: 885:10.1038/nrn3475 865: 864: 860: 836: 835: 822: 808: 798: 793: 788: 787: 783: 747: 746: 742: 726: 725: 718: 666: 665: 656: 627:Archivio Penale 620: 619: 615: 611: 599: 565: 548:neurotechnology 540:neuromodulation 504: 469: 460: 444:human reasoning 427: 391: 385: 350: 335:variant of the 329: 305: 247: 218: 187:M’Naghten Rules 167: 143: 134: 108: 85:Dana Foundation 72:Neuropsychology 68: 12: 11: 5: 4737: 4735: 4727: 4726: 4721: 4711: 4710: 4704: 4703: 4701: 4700: 4688: 4675: 4672: 4671: 4669: 4668: 4666:Self-awareness 4663: 4658: 4653: 4648: 4643: 4638: 4633: 4628: 4623: 4621:Neurodiversity 4618: 4613: 4608: 4603: 4598: 4593: 4588: 4583: 4578: 4572: 4570: 4566: 4565: 4563: 4562: 4557: 4552: 4547: 4542: 4537: 4532: 4527: 4522: 4520:Neuromarketing 4517: 4512: 4507: 4502: 4497: 4495:Neuroesthetics 4492: 4487: 4485:Neuroeconomics 4482: 4477: 4472: 4467: 4462: 4457: 4452: 4447: 4442: 4436: 4434: 4428: 4427: 4425: 4424: 4419: 4414: 4409: 4404: 4399: 4394: 4389: 4384: 4378: 4376: 4368: 4367: 4365: 4364: 4359: 4354: 4349: 4344: 4339: 4334: 4332:Neuroradiology 4329: 4324: 4319: 4314: 4312:Neuropathology 4309: 4304: 4302:Neuro-oncology 4299: 4294: 4289: 4284: 4279: 4274: 4269: 4264: 4259: 4253: 4251: 4243: 4242: 4235: 4233: 4231: 4230: 4225: 4220: 4215: 4210: 4205: 4200: 4195: 4190: 4188:Neurochemistry 4185: 4180: 4175: 4170: 4165: 4160: 4155: 4150: 4145: 4140: 4135: 4130: 4125: 4120: 4114: 4112: 4104: 4103: 4101: 4100: 4095: 4089: 4086: 4085: 4080: 4078: 4077: 4070: 4063: 4055: 4046: 4045: 4043: 4042: 4035: 4028: 4014: 4011:Law portal 3999: 3996: 3995: 3993: 3992: 3991: 3990: 3979: 3977: 3973: 3972: 3970: 3969: 3964: 3959: 3954: 3949: 3944: 3943: 3942: 3932: 3931: 3930: 3920: 3915: 3910: 3905: 3900: 3895: 3890: 3885: 3880: 3875: 3869: 3867: 3863: 3862: 3860: 3859: 3854: 3849: 3847:Trial advocacy 3844: 3839: 3834: 3829: 3828: 3827: 3822: 3817: 3812: 3807: 3802: 3797: 3787: 3782: 3777: 3772: 3767: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3755: 3745: 3740: 3735: 3730: 3725: 3720: 3715: 3710: 3705: 3700: 3694: 3692: 3686: 3685: 3683: 3682: 3677: 3672: 3667: 3662: 3657: 3652: 3647: 3642: 3637: 3632: 3627: 3622: 3617: 3612: 3607: 3601: 3599: 3595: 3594: 3592: 3591: 3586: 3581: 3576: 3571: 3570: 3569: 3559: 3558: 3557: 3552: 3547: 3542: 3537: 3532: 3531: 3530: 3515: 3510: 3505: 3500: 3494: 3492: 3486: 3485: 3483: 3482: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3470: 3465: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3443: 3438: 3433: 3428: 3427: 3426: 3421: 3416: 3406: 3405: 3404: 3399: 3394: 3384: 3379: 3377:Ballot measure 3373: 3371: 3365: 3364: 3362: 3361: 3356: 3354:Legal treatise 3351: 3350: 3349: 3344: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3322: 3320:Letters patent 3317: 3312: 3311: 3310: 3300: 3295: 3290: 3281: 3275: 3273: 3271:Sources of law 3267: 3266: 3264: 3263: 3258: 3256:Unenforced law 3253: 3248: 3243: 3238: 3233: 3228: 3223: 3218: 3213: 3208: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3196: 3186: 3181: 3176: 3171: 3166: 3161: 3156: 3151: 3146: 3141: 3136: 3131: 3126: 3121: 3116: 3111: 3106: 3101: 3096: 3091: 3086: 3081: 3075: 3070: 3065: 3060: 3055: 3050: 3045: 3040: 3035: 3030: 3028:Commercial law 3025: 3020: 3015: 3010: 3005: 3000: 2994: 2992: 2988: 2987: 2985: 2984: 2979: 2974: 2969: 2968: 2967: 2957: 2952: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2940: 2930: 2925: 2920: 2915: 2910: 2905: 2900: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2883: 2878: 2873: 2868: 2862: 2860: 2856: 2855: 2850: 2848: 2847: 2840: 2833: 2825: 2819: 2818: 2813: 2808: 2803: 2798: 2793: 2786: 2785:External links 2783: 2782: 2781: 2768: 2760: 2751: 2724: 2711: 2690: 2681: 2672: 2639: 2622: 2605: 2594: 2591: 2589: 2588: 2576: 2516: 2507:|journal= 2473: 2462:(4): 499–501. 2442: 2419: 2408:(2): 4, 8–10. 2392: 2368: 2349: 2330: 2314: 2308: 2282: 2241: 2206: 2144: 2114:10.1.1.731.755 2107:(9): 123–131. 2091: 2070: 2059:(2): 239–244. 2036: 2009: 2000:|journal= 1969: 1942:(2): 123–131. 1922: 1919:on 2011-01-14. 1863: 1826:(2): 222–234. 1806: 1787:(9): 631–642. 1771: 1712: 1707:The New Yorker 1693: 1642: 1615:(3): 196–213. 1599: 1562:(5792): 1402. 1546: 1517: 1514:on 2010-06-14. 1466:(2004-11-26). 1452: 1401: 1380:(3): 243–251. 1360: 1325: 1302: 1235: 1198:(1): 144–160. 1178: 1139: 1120: 1096: 1072: 1058: 1044: 1041:on 2011-05-14. 1026: 1023:on 2011-01-30. 1008: 999:|journal= 980: 954: 923:(4): 293–305. 907: 878:(5): 365–376. 858: 820: 811:|journal= 781: 740: 716: 654: 612: 610: 607: 606: 605: 598: 595: 564: 561: 544:proprioception 530:branch of the 503: 500: 468: 465: 459: 456: 440:intentionality 426: 423: 399:false memories 387:Main article: 384: 381: 349: 346: 328: 325: 304: 301: 279: 278: 275: 272: 269: 246: 243: 217: 214: 171:mental illness 166: 163: 142: 139: 133: 130: 107: 104: 67: 64: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4736: 4725: 4722: 4720: 4717: 4716: 4714: 4699: 4698: 4689: 4687: 4686: 4677: 4676: 4673: 4667: 4664: 4662: 4659: 4657: 4654: 4652: 4649: 4647: 4644: 4642: 4639: 4637: 4634: 4632: 4629: 4627: 4624: 4622: 4619: 4617: 4614: 4612: 4609: 4607: 4604: 4602: 4599: 4597: 4594: 4592: 4589: 4587: 4584: 4582: 4579: 4577: 4574: 4573: 4571: 4567: 4561: 4558: 4556: 4553: 4551: 4550:Neurotheology 4548: 4546: 4545:Neurorobotics 4543: 4541: 4540:Neuropolitics 4538: 4536: 4533: 4531: 4528: 4526: 4523: 4521: 4518: 4516: 4513: 4511: 4508: 4506: 4505:Neuroethology 4503: 4501: 4498: 4496: 4493: 4491: 4488: 4486: 4483: 4481: 4478: 4476: 4473: 4471: 4468: 4466: 4463: 4461: 4458: 4456: 4453: 4451: 4448: 4446: 4443: 4441: 4438: 4437: 4435: 4429: 4423: 4420: 4418: 4415: 4413: 4410: 4408: 4405: 4403: 4402:Motor control 4400: 4398: 4395: 4393: 4392:Chronobiology 4390: 4388: 4385: 4383: 4380: 4379: 4377: 4375: 4369: 4363: 4360: 4358: 4355: 4353: 4352:Neurovirology 4350: 4348: 4345: 4343: 4340: 4338: 4335: 4333: 4330: 4328: 4325: 4323: 4320: 4318: 4315: 4313: 4310: 4308: 4305: 4303: 4300: 4298: 4295: 4293: 4290: 4288: 4285: 4283: 4280: 4278: 4275: 4273: 4270: 4268: 4265: 4263: 4260: 4258: 4255: 4254: 4252: 4250: 4244: 4239: 4229: 4226: 4224: 4221: 4219: 4216: 4214: 4211: 4209: 4206: 4204: 4201: 4199: 4198:Neurogenetics 4196: 4194: 4191: 4189: 4186: 4184: 4181: 4179: 4176: 4174: 4171: 4169: 4166: 4164: 4161: 4159: 4156: 4154: 4151: 4149: 4146: 4144: 4141: 4139: 4136: 4134: 4133:Brain-reading 4131: 4129: 4128:Brain mapping 4126: 4124: 4121: 4119: 4116: 4115: 4113: 4111: 4105: 4099: 4096: 4094: 4091: 4090: 4087: 4083: 4076: 4071: 4069: 4064: 4062: 4057: 4056: 4053: 4041: 4040: 4036: 4034: 4033: 4029: 4027: 4026: 4015: 4013: 4012: 4007: 4001: 4000: 3997: 3989: 3986: 3985: 3984: 3981: 3980: 3978: 3974: 3968: 3965: 3963: 3960: 3958: 3955: 3953: 3950: 3948: 3945: 3941: 3938: 3937: 3936: 3933: 3929: 3926: 3925: 3924: 3921: 3919: 3916: 3914: 3911: 3909: 3906: 3904: 3901: 3899: 3896: 3894: 3893:Civil society 3891: 3889: 3886: 3884: 3881: 3879: 3876: 3874: 3871: 3870: 3868: 3864: 3858: 3855: 3853: 3852:Trier of fact 3850: 3848: 3845: 3843: 3840: 3838: 3835: 3833: 3830: 3826: 3823: 3821: 3818: 3816: 3813: 3811: 3808: 3806: 3803: 3801: 3798: 3796: 3793: 3792: 3791: 3788: 3786: 3783: 3781: 3778: 3776: 3773: 3771: 3768: 3766: 3763: 3759: 3756: 3754: 3751: 3750: 3749: 3746: 3744: 3741: 3739: 3738:Legal opinion 3736: 3734: 3731: 3729: 3726: 3724: 3721: 3719: 3718:Court-martial 3716: 3714: 3711: 3709: 3706: 3704: 3701: 3699: 3696: 3695: 3693: 3691: 3690:Jurisprudence 3687: 3681: 3678: 3676: 3673: 3671: 3668: 3666: 3663: 3661: 3658: 3656: 3653: 3651: 3648: 3646: 3643: 3641: 3638: 3636: 3633: 3631: 3628: 3626: 3623: 3621: 3618: 3616: 3613: 3611: 3608: 3606: 3603: 3602: 3600: 3596: 3590: 3587: 3585: 3582: 3580: 3579:Statutory law 3577: 3575: 3574:Socialist law 3572: 3568: 3567:Byzantine law 3565: 3564: 3563: 3560: 3556: 3553: 3551: 3548: 3546: 3543: 3541: 3538: 3536: 3533: 3529: 3526: 3525: 3524: 3521: 3520: 3519: 3518:Religious law 3516: 3514: 3511: 3509: 3506: 3504: 3501: 3499: 3496: 3495: 3493: 3491: 3490:Legal systems 3487: 3481: 3478: 3474: 3471: 3469: 3466: 3464: 3461: 3460: 3459: 3458:Statutory law 3456: 3452: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3444: 3442: 3439: 3437: 3434: 3432: 3429: 3425: 3422: 3420: 3417: 3415: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3407: 3403: 3400: 3398: 3395: 3393: 3390: 3389: 3388: 3385: 3383: 3380: 3378: 3375: 3374: 3372: 3370: 3366: 3360: 3357: 3355: 3352: 3348: 3345: 3343: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3335: 3331: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3323: 3321: 3318: 3316: 3313: 3309: 3306: 3305: 3304: 3301: 3299: 3296: 3294: 3291: 3289: 3288:Statutory law 3285: 3282: 3280: 3277: 3276: 3274: 3272: 3268: 3262: 3259: 3257: 3254: 3252: 3249: 3247: 3246:Transport law 3244: 3242: 3239: 3237: 3234: 3232: 3229: 3227: 3224: 3222: 3219: 3217: 3214: 3212: 3209: 3207: 3204: 3200: 3197: 3195: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3187: 3185: 3182: 3180: 3177: 3175: 3172: 3170: 3167: 3165: 3164:Legal fiction 3162: 3160: 3157: 3155: 3152: 3150: 3147: 3145: 3142: 3140: 3137: 3135: 3132: 3130: 3127: 3125: 3122: 3120: 3117: 3115: 3112: 3110: 3107: 3105: 3102: 3100: 3097: 3095: 3094:Financial law 3092: 3090: 3087: 3085: 3082: 3079: 3076: 3074: 3071: 3069: 3066: 3064: 3061: 3059: 3056: 3054: 3053:Corporate law 3051: 3049: 3046: 3044: 3041: 3039: 3036: 3034: 3031: 3029: 3026: 3024: 3021: 3019: 3016: 3014: 3011: 3009: 3006: 3004: 3001: 2999: 2996: 2995: 2993: 2989: 2983: 2980: 2978: 2977:Statutory law 2975: 2973: 2970: 2966: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2958: 2956: 2953: 2951: 2948: 2944: 2941: 2939: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2931: 2929: 2926: 2924: 2921: 2919: 2916: 2914: 2911: 2909: 2906: 2904: 2901: 2899: 2896: 2892: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2884: 2882: 2879: 2877: 2874: 2872: 2869: 2867: 2864: 2863: 2861: 2859:Core subjects 2857: 2853: 2846: 2841: 2839: 2834: 2832: 2827: 2826: 2823: 2817: 2814: 2812: 2809: 2807: 2804: 2802: 2799: 2797: 2794: 2792: 2789: 2788: 2784: 2778: 2774: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2757: 2752: 2748: 2742: 2734: 2730: 2725: 2721: 2717: 2712: 2702: 2701: 2696: 2691: 2687: 2682: 2678: 2673: 2669: 2663: 2654: 2649: 2645: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2628: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2606: 2602: 2597: 2596: 2592: 2586: 2580: 2577: 2572: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2555: 2550: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2534: 2527: 2520: 2517: 2512: 2499: 2491: 2487: 2480: 2478: 2474: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2446: 2443: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2423: 2420: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2396: 2393: 2382: 2381:www.darpa.mil 2378: 2372: 2369: 2364: 2360: 2353: 2350: 2345: 2341: 2334: 2331: 2328: 2324: 2318: 2315: 2311: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2286: 2283: 2280: 2275: 2271: 2268:(81): 14–21. 2267: 2263: 2259: 2252: 2250: 2248: 2246: 2242: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2213: 2211: 2207: 2202: 2198: 2193: 2188: 2184: 2180: 2175: 2170: 2166: 2162: 2158: 2151: 2149: 2145: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2115: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2095: 2092: 2087: 2080: 2074: 2071: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2047: 2040: 2037: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2013: 2010: 2005: 1992: 1984: 1980: 1973: 1970: 1965: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1926: 1923: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1902: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1874: 1867: 1864: 1859: 1855: 1850: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1810: 1807: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1775: 1772: 1767: 1763: 1758: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1740: 1735: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1716: 1713: 1708: 1704: 1697: 1694: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1646: 1643: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1603: 1600: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1570: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1550: 1547: 1544: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1524: 1522: 1518: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1497: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1469: 1465: 1459: 1457: 1453: 1448: 1444: 1439: 1434: 1429: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1405: 1402: 1397: 1393: 1388: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1364: 1361: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1329: 1326: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1306: 1303: 1298: 1294: 1289: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1271: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1239: 1236: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1214: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1182: 1179: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1143: 1140: 1135: 1131: 1124: 1121: 1110: 1106: 1100: 1097: 1086: 1082: 1076: 1073: 1068: 1062: 1059: 1054: 1048: 1045: 1040: 1036: 1030: 1027: 1022: 1018: 1012: 1009: 1004: 991: 983: 977: 973: 969: 965: 964:"Neuroethics" 958: 955: 950: 946: 942: 938: 930: 926: 922: 918: 911: 908: 903: 899: 895: 891: 886: 881: 877: 873: 869: 862: 859: 854: 850: 846: 842: 841: 833: 831: 829: 827: 825: 821: 816: 803: 792: 785: 782: 777: 773: 768: 763: 759: 755: 754:Iran J Neurol 751: 744: 741: 738: 734: 730: 723: 721: 717: 712: 708: 703: 698: 694: 690: 686: 682: 678: 674: 670: 663: 661: 659: 655: 650: 646: 641: 636: 632: 628: 624: 617: 614: 608: 604: 601: 600: 596: 594: 590: 586: 583: 579: 573: 571: 562: 560: 557: 553: 549: 545: 541: 537: 533: 529: 525: 520: 518: 514: 508: 501: 499: 497: 493: 489: 488:Mumbai, India 484: 482: 478: 474: 473:United States 466: 464: 457: 455: 452: 447: 445: 441: 436: 431: 424: 422: 418: 415: 411: 406: 402: 400: 396: 395:lie detection 390: 383:Lie detection 382: 380: 376: 374: 370: 366: 362: 358: 353: 347: 345: 341: 338: 334: 326: 324: 322: 318: 314: 310: 302: 300: 296: 293: 289: 285: 276: 273: 270: 267: 266: 265: 262: 260: 256: 252: 244: 242: 239: 233: 231: 227: 223: 215: 213: 210: 205: 203: 199: 194: 192: 188: 184: 183:John Hinckley 180: 176: 172: 164: 162: 158: 156: 151: 147: 140: 138: 131: 129: 127: 123: 119: 118: 113: 105: 103: 101: 97: 93: 88: 86: 80: 78: 73: 65: 63: 60: 58: 53: 51: 47: 43: 39: 35: 31: 27: 18: 4695: 4683: 4631:Neuroimaging 4626:Neurogenesis 4514: 4510:Neurohistory 4475:Neurobiotics 4374:neuroscience 4342:Neurosurgery 4267:Epileptology 4249:neuroscience 4218:Neurophysics 4208:Neurometrics 4183:Neurobiology 4178:Neuroanatomy 4148:Connectomics 4082:Neuroscience 4037: 4030: 4016: 4002: 3775:Jurisdiction 3743:Legal remedy 3698:Adjudication 3598:Legal theory 3436:Ratification 3431:Promulgation 3402:Proclamation 3382:Codification 3315:Human rights 3303:Divine right 3293:Constitution 3261:Women in law 3179:Military law 3174:Marriage law 3169:Maritime law 3068:Election law 3008:Aviation law 2998:Abortion law 2950:Property law 2886:Criminal law 2704:. Retrieved 2698: 2643: 2630: 2613: 2579: 2536: 2532: 2519: 2498:cite journal 2459: 2455: 2445: 2437:the original 2432: 2422: 2405: 2401: 2395: 2384:. Retrieved 2380: 2371: 2362: 2352: 2343: 2333: 2322: 2317: 2291: 2285: 2265: 2261: 2219: 2164: 2160: 2104: 2100: 2094: 2085: 2073: 2056: 2052: 2039: 2022: 2018: 2012: 1991:cite journal 1972: 1939: 1935: 1925: 1914:the original 1883: 1879: 1866: 1823: 1819: 1809: 1784: 1780: 1774: 1729: 1725: 1715: 1706: 1703:"Brain Gain" 1696: 1655: 1651: 1645: 1612: 1608: 1602: 1559: 1555: 1549: 1537: 1533: 1509:the original 1478: 1474: 1421:(2926): 13. 1418: 1414: 1404: 1377: 1373: 1363: 1338: 1334: 1328: 1319: 1315: 1305: 1252: 1248: 1238: 1195: 1191: 1181: 1156: 1152: 1142: 1133: 1123: 1112:. Retrieved 1108: 1099: 1088:. Retrieved 1084: 1075: 1061: 1047: 1039:the original 1029: 1021:the original 1011: 990:cite journal 957: 940: 936: 920: 916: 910: 875: 871: 861: 844: 838: 802:cite journal 784: 757: 753: 743: 733:The Atlantic 732: 676: 672: 630: 626: 616: 591: 587: 574: 566: 521: 509: 505: 485: 480: 476: 470: 467:Criminal law 461: 448: 432: 428: 419: 407: 403: 392: 377: 354: 351: 348:Neuroimaging 342: 330: 315:(PET scan), 306: 297: 280: 263: 248: 234: 230:life support 219: 206: 195: 175:Durham Rules 168: 159: 150:neuroimaging 144: 135: 115: 111: 109: 89: 81: 69: 61: 54: 34:neuroscience 30:neuroscience 25: 24: 4500:Neuroethics 4347:Neurotology 3947:Legislature 3878:Bureaucracy 3675:Rule of man 3670:Rule of law 3645:Libertarian 3508:Chinese law 3409:Legislation 3359:Regulations 3347:Law reports 3325:Natural law 3221:Reparations 3216:Refugee law 3139:Jurimetrics 3080:(Media law) 3018:Banking law 3013:Amnesty law 2991:Disciplines 2928:Private law 1540:(6): 36–40. 943:(2009–34). 760:(1): 53–8. 633:(3): 53–8. 327:Epigenetics 321:epigenetics 319:(MRI), and 226:brain death 216:Brain death 77:neuroethics 50:criminology 4713:Categories 4661:Neurotoxin 4362:Psychiatry 3940:Law school 3820:Prosecutor 3758:Magistrate 3545:Jewish law 3503:Common law 3424:Rulemaking 3419:Regulation 3369:Law making 3308:Divine law 3284:Legal code 3231:Sports law 3154:Law of war 3104:Health law 3089:Family law 3073:Energy law 3023:Bankruptcy 2960:Punishment 2955:Public law 2706:2011-03-22 2386:2019-12-01 2258:"Neurolaw" 1114:2019-12-01 1090:2019-12-01 933:See also: 679:(1): 3–5. 609:References 570:CSI effect 251:nootropics 245:Nootropics 155:recidivism 38:philosophy 4606:Neurochip 4372:Cognitive 4297:Neurology 3918:Judiciary 3913:Executive 3888:The bench 3825:Solicitor 3800:Barrister 3680:Sociology 3665:Pseudolaw 3605:Anarchist 3562:Roman law 3550:Parsi law 3535:Hindu law 3523:Canon law 3498:Civil law 3451:Concordat 3342:Precedent 3251:Trust law 3226:Space law 3063:Drugs law 2933:Procedure 2871:Civil law 2741:cite news 2662:cite news 2625:The RSA. 2571:205071132 2274:0585-0576 2236:145117821 2183:1662-5161 2109:CiteSeerX 1840:1076-8971 1801:1747-9991 1748:1662-5137 1629:1043-6618 1564:CiteSeerX 1355:148995296 1279:0027-8424 1230:247032069 1173:247300498 1055:. SciLaw. 894:1471-0048 847:: 61–92. 693:1180-4882 552:Modafinil 435:endocrine 4685:Category 4569:Concepts 4515:Neurolaw 4247:Clinical 4025:Category 3967:Tribunal 3952:Military 3795:Attorney 3765:Judgment 3625:Feminist 3540:Jain law 3337:Case law 3058:Cyberlaw 2965:Corporal 2943:Criminal 2913:Evidence 2903:Doctrine 2881:Contract 2635:Archived 2618:Archived 2563:22517146 2468:19092067 2201:24065912 2131:24588019 2065:19535562 1956:24588019 1910:18372290 1858:23772173 1766:24860437 1680:18097378 1637:18353672 1594:54524352 1586:16959998 1505:15590619 1447:32038355 1396:27002995 1297:23536303 1222:36950188 1213:10026748 1053:"SciLaw" 902:23571845 776:25874060 711:26674511 649:25874060 597:See also 556:Ampakine 528:Pentagon 515:and the 311:(fMRI), 284:Adderall 198:volition 120:. This 26:Neurolaw 4697:Commons 4110:science 4098:History 4093:Outline 4039:Outline 3976:History 3883:The bar 3857:Verdict 3805:Counsel 3785:Justice 3640:History 3463:Statute 3279:Charter 3241:Tax law 3189:Probate 2777:2881586 2733:2001085 2720:1563612 2631:YouTube 2614:YouTube 2541:Bibcode 2490:3178272 2192:3781577 2167:: 594. 2139:8480199 2031:2878876 1983:1736288 1964:8480199 1901:2583150 1849:3680134 1757:4026746 1688:2051062 1660:Bibcode 1556:Science 1496:1693445 1438:6992536 1322:: 1265. 1288:3625297 1257:Bibcode 949:1472245 767:4395810 702:4688026 640:4395810 471:In the 451:Daubert 373:impulse 292:Ritalin 66:History 4433:fields 3957:Police 3928:Agency 3810:Lawyer 3555:Sharia 3446:Treaty 3441:Repeal 3387:Decree 3298:Custom 3194:Estate 3144:Labour 2908:Equity 2775:  2731:  2718:  2569:  2561:  2533:Nature 2488:  2466:  2306:  2272:  2234:  2199:  2189:  2181:  2137:  2129:  2111:  2063:  2029:  2025:: 14. 1981:  1962:  1954:  1908:  1898:  1856:  1846:  1838:  1799:  1764:  1754:  1746:  1732:: 38. 1686:  1678:  1652:Nature 1635:  1627:  1592:  1584:  1566:  1503:  1493:  1445:  1435:  1394:  1353:  1295:  1285:  1277:  1228:  1220:  1210:  1171:  978:  947:  900:  892:  774:  764:  709:  699:  691:  647:  637:  546:, and 369:reward 365:memory 333:allele 48:, and 4108:Basic 4032:Index 3898:Court 3842:Trial 3748:Judge 3589:Yassa 3392:Edict 2938:Civil 2891:Crime 2567:S2CID 2529:(PDF) 2232:S2CID 2135:S2CID 2082:(PDF) 2049:(PDF) 1960:S2CID 1917:(PDF) 1876:(PDF) 1684:S2CID 1590:S2CID 1512:(PDF) 1471:(PDF) 1351:S2CID 1226:S2CID 1169:S2CID 794:(PDF) 524:DARPA 3780:Jury 3728:Fiqh 3584:Xeer 2982:Tort 2898:Deed 2773:SSRN 2747:link 2729:SSRN 2716:SSRN 2668:link 2559:PMID 2511:help 2486:SSRN 2464:PMID 2433:Time 2304:ISBN 2270:ISSN 2197:PMID 2179:ISSN 2127:PMID 2061:PMID 2027:SSRN 2004:help 1979:SSRN 1952:PMID 1906:PMID 1854:PMID 1836:ISSN 1797:ISSN 1762:PMID 1744:ISSN 1676:PMID 1633:PMID 1625:ISSN 1582:PMID 1501:PMID 1443:PMID 1392:PMID 1293:PMID 1275:ISSN 1218:PMID 1003:help 976:ISBN 945:SSRN 898:PMID 890:ISSN 815:help 772:PMID 707:PMID 689:ISSN 645:PMID 554:and 337:MAOA 288:ADHD 148:and 21:law. 2852:Law 2648:doi 2549:doi 2537:484 2410:doi 2296:doi 2279:PDF 2224:doi 2187:PMC 2169:doi 2119:doi 1944:doi 1896:PMC 1888:doi 1844:PMC 1828:doi 1789:doi 1752:PMC 1734:doi 1668:doi 1656:450 1617:doi 1574:doi 1560:313 1543:PDF 1491:PMC 1483:doi 1479:359 1433:PMC 1423:doi 1382:doi 1343:doi 1283:PMC 1265:doi 1253:110 1208:PMC 1200:doi 1161:doi 968:doi 925:doi 880:doi 849:doi 762:PMC 697:PMC 681:doi 635:PMC 486:In 209:PFC 4715:: 3286:/ 2743:}} 2739:{{ 2697:. 2664:}} 2660:{{ 2633:. 2629:. 2616:. 2612:. 2565:. 2557:. 2547:. 2535:. 2531:. 2502:: 2500:}} 2496:{{ 2476:^ 2460:36 2458:. 2454:. 2431:. 2404:. 2379:. 2361:. 2342:. 2302:, 2266:44 2264:. 2260:. 2244:^ 2230:. 2222:. 2209:^ 2195:. 2185:. 2177:. 2163:. 2159:. 2147:^ 2133:. 2125:. 2117:. 2105:15 2103:. 2084:. 2057:37 2055:. 2051:. 2023:84 2021:. 1995:: 1993:}} 1989:{{ 1958:. 1950:. 1940:15 1938:. 1934:. 1904:. 1894:. 1884:18 1882:. 1878:. 1852:. 1842:. 1834:. 1824:19 1822:. 1818:. 1795:. 1783:. 1760:. 1750:. 1742:. 1728:. 1724:. 1705:. 1682:. 1674:. 1666:. 1654:. 1631:. 1623:. 1613:57 1611:. 1588:. 1580:. 1572:. 1558:. 1538:16 1536:. 1532:. 1520:^ 1499:. 1489:. 1477:. 1473:. 1455:^ 1441:. 1431:. 1419:10 1417:. 1413:. 1390:. 1378:18 1376:. 1372:. 1349:. 1339:44 1337:. 1320:82 1318:. 1314:. 1291:. 1281:. 1273:. 1263:. 1251:. 1247:. 1224:. 1216:. 1206:. 1194:. 1190:. 1167:. 1155:. 1151:. 1132:. 1107:. 1083:. 994:: 992:}} 988:{{ 974:. 966:. 941:11 939:. 919:. 896:. 888:. 876:14 874:. 870:. 843:. 823:^ 806:: 804:}} 800:{{ 770:. 758:14 756:. 752:. 731:. 719:^ 705:. 695:. 687:. 677:41 675:. 671:. 657:^ 643:. 629:. 625:. 542:, 401:. 371:, 367:, 323:. 232:. 193:. 44:, 40:, 36:, 4074:e 4067:t 4060:v 2844:e 2837:t 2830:v 2779:. 2766:. 2758:. 2749:) 2735:. 2722:. 2709:. 2670:) 2656:. 2650:: 2573:. 2551:: 2543:: 2513:) 2509:( 2492:. 2470:. 2416:. 2412:: 2406:6 2389:. 2365:. 2346:. 2298:: 2276:. 2238:. 2226:: 2203:. 2171:: 2165:7 2141:. 2121:: 2088:. 2067:. 2033:. 2006:) 2002:( 1985:. 1966:. 1946:: 1890:: 1860:. 1830:: 1803:. 1791:: 1785:7 1768:. 1736:: 1730:8 1709:. 1690:. 1670:: 1662:: 1639:. 1619:: 1596:. 1576:: 1485:: 1449:. 1425:: 1398:. 1384:: 1357:. 1345:: 1299:. 1267:: 1259:: 1232:. 1202:: 1196:1 1175:. 1163:: 1157:1 1136:. 1117:. 1093:. 1005:) 1001:( 984:. 970:: 951:. 931:. 927:: 921:5 904:. 882:: 855:. 851:: 845:6 817:) 813:( 778:. 735:. 713:. 683:: 651:. 631:1

Index


neuroscience
neuroscience
philosophy
social psychology
cognitive neuroscience
criminology
functional magnetic resonance imaging
Neuropsychology
neuroethics
Dana Foundation
Baylor College of Medicine
University of Pennsylvania
Vanderbilt University
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
United States Supreme Court
Daubert Standard
Behavioral testing
neuroimaging
recidivism
mental illness
Durham Rules
insanity defense
John Hinckley
M’Naghten Rules
criminally insane
volition
irresistible impulse
PFC
persistent vegetative state

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑