Knowledge (XXG)

No true Scotsman

Source đź“ť

191:. This clearly constitutes a counter example, which definitively falsifies the universal proposition originally put forward. ('Falsifies' here is, of course, simply the opposite of 'verifies'; and it therefore means 'shows to be false'.) Allowing that this is indeed such a counter example, he ought to withdraw; retreating perhaps to a rather weaker claim about most or some. But even an imaginary Scot is, like the rest of us, human; and none of us always does what we ought to do. So what he is in fact saying is: "No true Scotsman would do such a thing!" 1556: 203:, and "emerging democracies", which may start them, with the "no true Scotsman" fallacy. Spengler alleges that political scientists have attempted to save the "US academic dogma" that democracies never start wars against other democracies from counterexamples by declaring any democracy which does indeed start a war against another democracy to be flawed, thus maintaining that no 186:
Sex Maniac Strikes Again". Our reader is, as he confidently expected, agreeably shocked: "No Scot would do such a thing!" Yet the very next Sunday he finds in that same favourite source a report of the even more scandalous on-goings of Mr Angus McSporran in
162:, when faced with falsifying facts, is transformed while you wait into an impotent tautology: if ostensible Scotsmen put sugar on their porridge, then this is by itself sufficient to prove them not 56:
by covertly modifying the initial claim. Rather than admitting error or providing evidence that would disqualify the falsifying counterexample, the claim is modified into an
469:
political-science professors... Jack Mansfield and Ed Snyder distinguish between 'mature democracies', which never, never start wars ('hardly ever', as the captain of the
673: 678: 126:
may be at stake if someone regularly considered to be Scottish commits a heinous crime. To protect people of Scottish heritage from a possible accusation of
1056: 485: 713: 555: 514: 60:
claim in order to definitionally exclude the undesirable counterexample. The modification is signalled by the use of non-substantive
867: 448: 425: 138:(definitionally) excluded from being part of our group such that they cannot serve as a counterexample to the group's good nature. 1475: 683: 214:
suggested that phrases like "no true Christian ever kills, no true communist state is repressive" exemplify the fallacy.
1511: 1487: 1076: 1580: 1088: 832: 1098: 473:
sang), and 'emerging democracies', which start them all the time, in fact far more frequently than do dictatorships
415: 1585: 1506: 1063: 959: 109: 57: 49: 1501: 1341: 809: 645: 601: 1521: 1336: 852: 548: 287: 200: 130:, one may use this fallacy to deny that the group is associated with this undesirable member or action. "No 1443: 1433: 1383: 1357: 1133: 1007: 974: 875: 857: 757: 606: 588: 1481: 1469: 1449: 1438: 1353: 1166: 1142: 964: 920: 772: 698: 611: 282: 277: 242: 237: 394: 199:, writing under his pseudonym "Spengler", compared distinguishing between "mature" democracies, which 1496: 1400: 1364: 1279: 1235: 1071: 1002: 792: 621: 596: 297: 272: 247: 232: 196: 1374: 1273: 1220: 1196: 1119: 1022: 954: 880: 693: 688: 665: 640: 127: 1559: 1492: 1306: 1191: 1176: 1123: 1083: 1032: 969: 928: 905: 885: 788: 632: 616: 541: 104:
The "no true Scotsman" fallacy is committed when the arguer satisfies the following conditions:
75:" of a refuted generalization attempt. The following is a simplified rendition of the fallacy: 1378: 1215: 1205: 1181: 1158: 1114: 1040: 992: 950: 910: 752: 747: 569: 520: 510: 421: 262: 224: 135: 61: 115:
offering a modified assertion that definitionally excludes a targeted unwanted counterexample
1528: 1369: 1268: 1210: 1148: 943: 817: 802: 727: 655: 650: 489: 444: 292: 178:
Imagine some Scottish chauvinist settled down one Sunday morning with his customary copy of
134:
Scotsman would do something so undesirable"; i.e., the people who would do such a thing are
45: 1249: 1225: 1045: 1017: 997: 845: 813: 797: 267: 80: 1285: 762: 456: 1186: 1171: 1093: 1012: 938: 578: 122:
An appeal to purity is commonly associated with protecting a preferred group. Scottish
68: 53: 1574: 1311: 1201: 933: 896: 840: 708: 703: 307: 211: 72: 31: 1323: 742: 312: 252: 493: 146:
The description of the fallacy in this form is attributed to British philosopher
1516: 1293: 1230: 257: 147: 17: 89:
Person B: "But my uncle Angus is a Scotsman and he puts sugar on his porridge."
1426: 1420: 1347: 1259: 524: 123: 1533: 1317: 1301: 984: 488:", P. Brézillon et al. (eds.): CONTEXT 2017, LNAI 10257, pp. 243–253, 2017. 363: 302: 1463: 533: 1411: 188: 84: 486:
Is Flew's No True Scotsman Fallacy a True Fallacy? A Contextual Analysis
565: 183: 537: 335: 417:
Thinking About Thinking (or, Do I Sincerely Want to be Right?)
30:
For the practice of wearing a kilt without undergarments, see
64:
such as "true", "pure", "genuine", "authentic", "real", etc.
507:
Rationality, What It Is, Why It Seems Scarce, Why It Matters
158:
In this ungracious move a brash generalization, such as
357: 355: 108:
not publicly retreating from the initial, falsified
1410: 1398: 1257: 1248: 1157: 1132: 1107: 1031: 983: 919: 894: 866: 831: 781: 735: 726: 664: 630: 586: 577: 207:democracy starts a war against a fellow democracy. 176: 156: 674:Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise 679:Negative conclusion from affirmative premises 549: 385: 383: 8: 1407: 1254: 1129: 732: 583: 556: 542: 534: 409: 407: 405: 403: 182:. He reads the story under the headline, " 118:using rhetoric to signal the modification 439: 437: 324: 160:No Scotsmen put sugar on their porridge 95:Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge." 330: 328: 7: 48:in which one attempts to protect an 340:Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy 25: 1555: 1554: 509:. New York: Viking. p. 88. 449:"No true Scotsman starts a war" 420:. Fontana/Collins. p. 47. 1052:Correlation implies causation 364:"The No-True-Scotsman Fallacy" 150:, who wrote, in his 1966 book 1: 494:10.1007/978-3-319-57837-8_19 71:explains the fallacy as an " 1602: 1476:I'm entitled to my opinion 29: 1550: 1459: 1332: 1502:Motte-and-bailey fallacy 602:Affirming the consequent 52:claim from a falsifying 27:Informal logical fallacy 1522:Two wrongs make a right 853:Denying the correlative 505:Pinker, Steven (2021). 288:Republican in Name Only 172:Thinking About Thinking 1507:Psychologist's fallacy 1444:Argument to moderation 1434:Argument from anecdote 1384:Chronological snobbery 1008:Quoting out of context 975:Overwhelming exception 858:Suppressed correlative 758:Quoting out of context 633:quantificational logic 607:Denying the antecedent 484:Robert Ian Anderson, " 193: 168: 1470:The Four Great Errors 1450:Argumentum ad populum 1439:Argument from silence 1143:Argumentum ad baculum 921:Faulty generalization 612:Argument from fallacy 283:Reification (fallacy) 278:Persuasive definition 243:Democrat in Name Only 238:Caledonian Antisyzygy 180:The News of the World 142:Origin and philosophy 67:Philosophy professor 1488:Invincible ignorance 1294:Reductio ad Stalinum 1280:Reductio ad Hitlerum 1236:Wisdom of repugnance 1003:Moving the goalposts 868:Illicit transference 793:Begging the question 714:Undistributed middle 622:Mathematical fallacy 597:Affirming a disjunct 414:Antony Flew (1975). 391:God & Philosophy 298:Tautology (language) 273:Moving the goalposts 248:Epistemic commitment 233:Begging the question 152:God & Philosophy 128:guilt by association 1221:Parade of horribles 1197:In-group favoritism 1023:Syntactic ambiguity 666:Syllogistic fallacy 589:propositional logic 397:, Hutchinson, 1966. 1581:1971 introductions 1307:Poisoning the well 1124:Proof by assertion 1099:Texas sharpshooter 1033:Questionable cause 970:Slothful induction 929:Anecdotal evidence 789:Circular reasoning 684:Exclusive premises 646:Illicit conversion 91:Person A: "But no 83:puts sugar on his 1568: 1567: 1546: 1545: 1542: 1541: 1482:Ignoratio elenchi 1394: 1393: 1244: 1243: 1206:Not invented here 911:Converse accident 833:Correlative-based 810:Compound question 753:False attribution 748:False equivalence 722: 721: 459:on 5 January 2019 445:Goldman, David P. 263:List of fallacies 170:In his 1975 book 16:(Redirected from 1593: 1586:Verbal fallacies 1558: 1557: 1529:Special pleading 1408: 1269:Appeal to motive 1255: 1231:Stirring symbols 1211:Island mentality 1149:Wishful thinking 1130: 846:Perfect solution 823:No true Scotsman 818:Complex question 803:Leading question 782:Question-begging 768:No true Scotsman 733: 656:Quantifier shift 651:Proof by example 584: 558: 551: 544: 535: 529: 528: 502: 496: 482: 476: 475: 466: 464: 455:. Archived from 441: 432: 431: 411: 398: 387: 378: 377: 375: 374: 362:Curtis, Gary N. 359: 350: 349: 347: 346: 332: 293:Special pleading 201:never start wars 197:David P. Goldman 46:informal fallacy 42:appeal to purity 38:No true Scotsman 21: 18:No True Scotsman 1601: 1600: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1564: 1538: 1512:Rationalization 1455: 1402: 1390: 1328: 1250:Genetic fallacy 1240: 1153: 1128: 1103: 1027: 1018:Sorites paradox 998:False precision 979: 960:Double counting 915: 890: 862: 827: 814:Loaded question 798:Loaded language 777: 718: 660: 626: 573: 562: 532: 517: 504: 503: 499: 483: 479: 462: 460: 447:(31 Jan 2006). 443: 442: 435: 428: 413: 412: 401: 388: 381: 372: 370: 361: 360: 353: 344: 342: 334: 333: 326: 322: 317: 268:Loaded language 220: 205:true and mature 144: 102: 97: 90: 88: 35: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1599: 1597: 1589: 1588: 1583: 1573: 1572: 1566: 1565: 1563: 1562: 1551: 1548: 1547: 1544: 1543: 1540: 1539: 1537: 1536: 1531: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1514: 1509: 1504: 1499: 1490: 1485: 1478: 1473: 1466: 1460: 1457: 1456: 1454: 1453: 1446: 1441: 1436: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1416: 1414: 1405: 1396: 1395: 1392: 1391: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1372: 1367: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1351: 1344: 1342:Accomplishment 1333: 1330: 1329: 1327: 1326: 1321: 1314: 1309: 1304: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1271: 1265: 1263: 1252: 1246: 1245: 1242: 1241: 1239: 1238: 1233: 1228: 1223: 1218: 1213: 1208: 1199: 1194: 1189: 1184: 1179: 1174: 1169: 1163: 1161: 1155: 1154: 1152: 1151: 1146: 1138: 1136: 1127: 1126: 1117: 1111: 1109: 1105: 1104: 1102: 1101: 1096: 1094:Slippery slope 1091: 1086: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1060: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1037: 1035: 1029: 1028: 1026: 1025: 1020: 1015: 1013:Slippery slope 1010: 1005: 1000: 995: 989: 987: 981: 980: 978: 977: 972: 967: 962: 957: 948: 947: 946: 941: 939:Cherry picking 931: 925: 923: 917: 916: 914: 913: 908: 902: 900: 892: 891: 889: 888: 883: 878: 872: 870: 864: 863: 861: 860: 855: 850: 849: 848: 837: 835: 829: 828: 826: 825: 820: 807: 806: 805: 795: 785: 783: 779: 778: 776: 775: 770: 765: 760: 755: 750: 745: 739: 737: 730: 724: 723: 720: 719: 717: 716: 711: 706: 701: 696: 691: 686: 681: 676: 670: 668: 662: 661: 659: 658: 653: 648: 643: 637: 635: 628: 627: 625: 624: 619: 614: 609: 604: 599: 593: 591: 581: 575: 574: 563: 561: 560: 553: 546: 538: 531: 530: 516:978-0525561996 515: 497: 477: 433: 426: 399: 379: 351: 323: 321: 318: 316: 315: 310: 305: 300: 295: 290: 285: 280: 275: 270: 265: 260: 255: 250: 245: 240: 235: 230: 221: 219: 216: 206: 174:, Flew wrote: 143: 140: 136:tautologically 133: 124:national pride 120: 119: 116: 113: 101: 98: 94: 79:Person A: "No 77: 69:Bradley Dowden 54:counterexample 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1598: 1587: 1584: 1582: 1579: 1578: 1576: 1561: 1553: 1552: 1549: 1535: 1532: 1530: 1527: 1523: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1515: 1513: 1510: 1508: 1505: 1503: 1500: 1498: 1494: 1491: 1489: 1486: 1484: 1483: 1479: 1477: 1474: 1472: 1471: 1467: 1465: 1462: 1461: 1458: 1452: 1451: 1447: 1445: 1442: 1440: 1437: 1435: 1432: 1428: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1418: 1417: 1415: 1413: 1409: 1406: 1404: 1397: 1385: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1376: 1373: 1371: 1368: 1366: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1352: 1350: 1349: 1345: 1343: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1335: 1334: 1331: 1325: 1322: 1320: 1319: 1315: 1313: 1310: 1308: 1305: 1303: 1300: 1296: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1272: 1270: 1267: 1266: 1264: 1262: 1261: 1256: 1253: 1251: 1247: 1237: 1234: 1232: 1229: 1227: 1224: 1222: 1219: 1217: 1214: 1212: 1209: 1207: 1203: 1202:Invented here 1200: 1198: 1195: 1193: 1190: 1188: 1185: 1183: 1180: 1178: 1175: 1173: 1170: 1168: 1165: 1164: 1162: 1160: 1156: 1150: 1147: 1145: 1144: 1140: 1139: 1137: 1135: 1131: 1125: 1121: 1118: 1116: 1113: 1112: 1110: 1106: 1100: 1097: 1095: 1092: 1090: 1087: 1085: 1082: 1078: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1070: 1066: 1065: 1061: 1059: 1058: 1054: 1053: 1051: 1047: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1039: 1038: 1036: 1034: 1030: 1024: 1021: 1019: 1016: 1014: 1011: 1009: 1006: 1004: 1001: 999: 996: 994: 991: 990: 988: 986: 982: 976: 973: 971: 968: 966: 965:False analogy 963: 961: 958: 956: 952: 949: 945: 942: 940: 937: 936: 935: 934:Sampling bias 932: 930: 927: 926: 924: 922: 918: 912: 909: 907: 904: 903: 901: 899: 898: 897:Secundum quid 893: 887: 884: 882: 879: 877: 874: 873: 871: 869: 865: 859: 856: 854: 851: 847: 844: 843: 842: 841:False dilemma 839: 838: 836: 834: 830: 824: 821: 819: 815: 811: 808: 804: 801: 800: 799: 796: 794: 790: 787: 786: 784: 780: 774: 771: 769: 766: 764: 761: 759: 756: 754: 751: 749: 746: 744: 741: 740: 738: 734: 731: 729: 725: 715: 712: 710: 709:Illicit minor 707: 705: 704:Illicit major 702: 700: 697: 695: 692: 690: 687: 685: 682: 680: 677: 675: 672: 671: 669: 667: 663: 657: 654: 652: 649: 647: 644: 642: 639: 638: 636: 634: 629: 623: 620: 618: 615: 613: 610: 608: 605: 603: 600: 598: 595: 594: 592: 590: 585: 582: 580: 576: 571: 567: 559: 554: 552: 547: 545: 540: 539: 536: 526: 522: 518: 512: 508: 501: 498: 495: 491: 487: 481: 478: 474: 472: 458: 454: 450: 446: 440: 438: 434: 429: 427:9780006335801 423: 419: 418: 410: 408: 406: 404: 400: 396: 392: 389:Antony Flew, 386: 384: 380: 369: 368:Fallacy Files 365: 358: 356: 352: 341: 337: 331: 329: 325: 319: 314: 311: 309: 308:True Scotsman 306: 304: 301: 299: 296: 294: 291: 289: 286: 284: 281: 279: 276: 274: 271: 269: 266: 264: 261: 259: 256: 254: 251: 249: 246: 244: 241: 239: 236: 234: 231: 229: 227: 223: 222: 217: 215: 213: 212:Steven Pinker 208: 204: 202: 198: 195:The essayist 192: 190: 185: 181: 175: 173: 167: 165: 161: 155: 153: 149: 141: 139: 137: 131: 129: 125: 117: 114: 111: 107: 106: 105: 99: 96: 92: 86: 82: 76: 74: 73:ad hoc rescue 70: 65: 63: 59: 55: 51: 47: 43: 39: 33: 32:True Scotsman 19: 1497:Naturalistic 1480: 1468: 1448: 1419: 1403:of relevance 1346: 1324:Whataboutism 1316: 1292: 1286:Godwin's law 1278: 1258: 1141: 1134:Consequences 1115:Law/Legality 1089:Single cause 1062: 1055: 895: 822: 767: 763:Loki's Wager 743:Equivocation 736:Equivocation 506: 500: 480: 470: 468: 461:. Retrieved 457:the original 452: 416: 390: 371:. Retrieved 367: 343:. Retrieved 339: 313:Whataboutism 253:Equivocation 225: 209: 194: 179: 177: 171: 169: 163: 159: 157: 151: 145: 121: 110:a posteriori 103: 78: 66: 50:a posteriori 41: 37: 36: 1517:Red herring 1274:Association 955:Conjunction 876:Composition 773:Reification 689:Existential 641:Existential 336:"Fallacies" 258:Gatekeeping 148:Antony Flew 1575:Categories 1493:Moralistic 1427:Sealioning 1421:Ad nauseam 1348:Ipse dixit 1260:Ad hominem 1084:Regression 886:Ecological 699:Four terms 617:Masked man 525:1237806678 463:1 December 453:Asia Times 373:2016-11-12 345:2022-02-09 320:References 228:hypothesis 100:Occurrence 1534:Straw man 1412:Arguments 1401:fallacies 1375:Tradition 1365:Etymology 1337:Authority 1318:Tu quoque 1302:Bulverism 1072:Gambler's 1041:Animistic 985:Ambiguity 951:Base rate 694:Necessity 566:fallacies 303:True Pole 166:Scotsmen. 112:assertion 1560:Category 1192:Ridicule 1177:Flattery 1167:Children 1064:Post hoc 944:McNamara 906:Accident 881:Division 728:Informal 471:Pinafore 218:See also 189:Aberdeen 85:porridge 81:Scotsman 62:rhetoric 58:a priori 1379:Novelty 1354:Poverty 1216:Loyalty 1182:Novelty 1159:Emotion 1108:Appeals 1077:Inverse 1057:Cum hoc 1046:Furtive 564:Common 210:Author 1464:ClichĂ© 1399:Other 1370:Nature 1358:Wealth 993:Accent 579:Formal 523:  513:  424:  395:p. 104 226:Ad hoc 184:Sidcup 44:is an 1226:Spite 1120:Stone 1312:Tone 1187:Pity 1172:Fear 570:list 521:OCLC 511:ISBN 465:2014 422:ISBN 164:true 132:true 93:true 631:In 587:In 490:doi 154:, 40:or 1577:: 1495:/ 1377:/ 1356:/ 1204:/ 1122:/ 953:/ 816:/ 812:/ 791:/ 519:. 467:. 451:. 436:^ 402:^ 393:, 382:^ 366:. 354:^ 338:. 327:^ 87:." 572:) 568:( 557:e 550:t 543:v 527:. 492:: 430:. 376:. 348:. 34:. 20:)

Index

No True Scotsman
True Scotsman
informal fallacy
a posteriori
counterexample
a priori
rhetoric
Bradley Dowden
ad hoc rescue
Scotsman
porridge
a posteriori
national pride
guilt by association
tautologically
Antony Flew
Sidcup
Aberdeen
David P. Goldman
never start wars
Steven Pinker
Ad hoc hypothesis
Begging the question
Caledonian Antisyzygy
Democrat in Name Only
Epistemic commitment
Equivocation
Gatekeeping
List of fallacies
Loaded language

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑