Golden Liberty - Knowledge (XXG)

31: 504:, had many values in common with the reformist noblemen of the Commonwealth. However, the comparison is very weak, as the so-called Southern aristocracy was not limited to a hereditary caste; the social structure, based simply on the acquisition (or loss) of wealth and property, was fluid; and there was of course no monarchy or nobility in the United States. 395:) were a substantially larger percentage than in any other European country, and the nobles extended from powerful princes to knights poorer than many peasants; in comparison, in France, only about 1% of the population had the right to vote in 1831, and in 1832, in the United Kingdom, only about 14% of male adults could vote 480:

citizens of the Commonwealth praised the right of resistance, the social contract, the liberty of the individual, the principle of government by consent, the value of self-reliance, all widespread concepts found in the modern, liberal democracies. Just like liberal democrats of the 19th and 20th

520: 549:" was a statement of social satire, and it should be evaluated whether it reflected the fact of the age. A number of Russian peasants fled from their far more brutal lords to settle in liberal Poland, which might stand out as example of counterevidence to the "Hell for the Peasants" claim. 327:), the right of an individual land envoy to oppose a decision by the majority in a Sejm session; the voicing of such a "free veto" nullified all the legislation that had been passed at that session; during the crisis of the second half of the 17th century, Polish nobles could also use the 588:

refusing to pay taxes for a larger and modern army and magnates bribed by foreign powers paralyzing the Commonwealth political system, the Commonwealth was unable to keep up with its increasingly militarized and efficient (through

240:. Over time, King Henry's Articles were merged with the pacta conventa, specific pledges agreed to by the king-elect. From then on, the king was effectively a partner with the noble class and was always supervised by a group of 235:

The monarch's power was limited, in favour of the sizable noble class. Each new king had to subscribe to King Henry's Articles, which were the basis of Poland's political system and included almost unprecedented guarantees of

391:(the adoption of new laws), foreign affairs, declaration of war and taxation (changes of existing taxes or the levying of new ones). Also, the 10% of Commonwealth population who enjoyed those political rights (the 624:

A similar fate was averted by Italy; first due to a secular inability of the kings of France and Spain, and the Papacy, to come to terms on how to divide the country, then through the reaction against

432:

was developing in the stronger countries of Europe, but the exception was characterized by a striking similarity to certain modern values. At a time that most European countries were headed toward

552:

In its extreme, the Golden Liberty has been criticized as being responsible for "civil wars and invasions, national weakness, irresolution, and poverty of spirit". Failing to evolve into the "

428:

The "Golden Liberty" was a unique and controversial feature of Poland's political system. It was an exception, characterized by a strong aristocracy and a feeble king, in an age when

30: 218: 270: 135: 515:

to the majority of the population, failing them by failing to protect them from the excesses of the nobility, resulting in the slow development of cities and the

507:

Others however criticize the Golden Liberty, pointing out it was limited only to the nobility, excluding peasants or townsfolk and gave no legal system to grant

1450: 861: 370:

of its regions. It is, however, difficult to decisively call the Commonwealth either confederation or federation, as it had some qualities of both of them

1416: 244:. The doctrine had ancient republican thought at its roots, which was then reapplied with varying success to an elective monarchy's political reality. 1305: 1118: 816:# Norman Davies, God's Playground. A History of Poland, Vol. 1: The Origins to 1795, Vol. 2: 1795 to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 481:

centuries, the Polish noblemen were concerned about the power of the state. The Polish noblemen were strongly opposed to the very concept of the

928: 1402: 1470: 1154: 355:

The Commonwealth's political system is difficult to fit into a simple category, but it can be tentatively described as a mixture of these:

1012: 982: 955: 1460: 120: 1435: 112: 1455: 1398: 1356: 1325: 1301: 1274: 1253: 1233: 1202: 1177: 1150: 1100: 1076: 1056: 1032: 1008: 978: 951: 920: 880: 857: 829: 821: 285:), "agreed-to agreements" negotiated with the king-elect, including a bill of rights, binding on the king, derived from the earlier 1329: 1465: 1036: 205:

The political doctrine of the Commonwealth of the Two Nations was "our state is a republic under the presidency of the King".

766: 628:

domination which, as late as 1861, finally aligned most of the country's states in support of a national monarchy under King

1278: 1237: 1104: 1060: 557: 488:

Perhaps the closest parallels to Poland's 'Noble Democracy' can be found outside Europe altogether, in America, among the

429: 1421: 1181: 129:), regardless of rank, economic status or their ethnic background were considered to have equal legal status and enjoyed 1209: 1430: 1475: 1359: 1016: 260: 39: 996: 286: 223: 186: 173: 1130: 469: 461: 412: 408: 277: 228: 191: 1115: 493: 1340: 966: 729: 1318:

The Military Revolution and Political Change: Origins of Democracy and Autocracy in Early Modern Europe

1370: 845: 387:

were equal in rights and privileges, and the Sejm could veto the king on important matters, including

734: 618: 598: 594: 573: 313: 308: 216:" ("The King reigns and does not govern"). The Commonwealth had a parliament, the Sejm, as well as a 1248: