131:. NDAs are commonly signed when two companies, individuals, or other entities (such as partnerships, societies, etc.) are considering doing business and need to understand the processes used in each other's business for the purpose of evaluating the potential business relationship. NDAs can be "mutual", meaning both parties are restricted in their use of the materials provided, or they can restrict the use of material by a single party. An employee can be required to sign an NDA or NDA-like agreement with an employer, protecting trade secrets. In fact, some employment agreements include a clause restricting employees' use and dissemination of company-owned confidential information. In legal disputes resolved by
33:
178:
reason (e.g., maintaining the secrecy necessary to satisfy patent laws or legal protection for trade secrets, limiting disclosure of information prior to issuing a press release for a major announcement, or simply ensuring that a receiving party does not use or disclose information without compensating the disclosing party).
199:
A multilateral NDA involves three or more parties where at least one of the parties anticipates disclosing information to the other parties and requires that the information be protected from further disclosure. This type of NDA eliminates the need for separate unilateral or bilateral NDAs between
177:
A unilateral NDA (sometimes referred to as a one-way NDA) involves two parties where only one party (i.e., the disclosing party) anticipates disclosing certain information to the other party (i.e., the receiving party) and requires that the information be protected from further disclosure for some
212:
A NDA can protect any type of information that is not generally known. They may also contain clauses that will protect the person receiving the information so that if they lawfully obtained the information through other sources they would not be obligated to keep the information secret. In other
190:
When presented with a unilateral NDA, some parties may insist upon a bilateral NDA, even though they anticipate that only one of the parties will disclose information under the NDA. This approach is intended to incentivize the drafter to make the provisions in the NDA more "fair and balanced" by
186:
A bilateral NDA (sometimes referred to as a mutual NDA, MNDA, or a two-way NDA) involves two parties where both parties anticipate disclosing information to one another that each intends to protect from further disclosure. This type of NDA is common for businesses considering some kind of joint
614:
If you've ever signed a settlement agreement resolving some dispute, chances are pretty good it contained a confidentiality provision. In many cases, one side or both wish to keep the terms of a settlement to themselves – whether to avoid disclosure of amounts paid to settle or for some other
299:
to use appropriate efforts (not less than reasonable efforts) to keep the information secure. Reasonable efforts is often defined as a standard of care relating to confidential information that is no less rigorous than that which the recipient uses to keep its own similar information secure;
200:
only two parties. E.g., a single multiparty NDA entered into by three parties who each intend to disclose information to the other two parties could be used in place of three separate bilateral NDAs between the first and second parties, second and third parties, and third and first parties.
203:
A multilateral NDA can be advantageous because the parties involved review, execute, and implement just one agreement. This advantage can be offset by more complex negotiations that may be required for the parties involved to reach a unanimous consensus on a multilateral agreement.
154:), or discrimination against and harassment of themselves, may be paid compensation subject to an NDA forbidding them from disclosing the events complained about. Such conditions in an NDA may not be enforceable in law, although they may intimidate the former employee into silence.
319:(many NDAs require the receiving party to give the disclosing party prompt notice of any efforts to obtain such disclosure, and possibly to cooperate with any attempt by the disclosing party to seek judicial protection for the relevant confidential information).
595:
ost landlords and tenants are united in interest in not wanting the terms of their settlement publicized in a public forum where they may be misunderstood or misinterpreted as being weak, scared or simply not feeling strongly about their business and their
122:
It is a contract through which the parties agree not to disclose any information covered by the agreement. An NDA creates a confidential relationship between the parties, typically to protect any type of confidential and proprietary information or
405:, the term "back-to-back agreement" refers to an NDA entered into with a third party who legitimately receives confidential information, putting them under similar non-disclosure obligations as the initial party granted the information.
1055:
438:
based on an account of the commercial profits which might have been earned if the agreement had been honoured, or damages based on the price of releasing the other party from its obligations under the agreement.
578:
463:
442:
Commercial entities entering into confidentiality agreements need to ensure that the scope of their agreement does not go beyond what is necessary to protect commercial information. In the case of
303:
to ensure that anyone to whom the information is disclosed further abides by obligations restricting use, restricting disclosure, and ensuring security at least as protective as the agreement; and
696:
427:
NDAs are often used as a condition of a financial settlement in an attempt to silence whistleblowing employees from making public the misdeeds of their former employers. There is law, the
639:
1073:
630:
462:, and the court agreed that the relevant wording "went further than could reasonably be required" to protect commercial information. The agreement was held to be in breach of
213:
words, the NDA typically only requires the receiving party to maintain information in confidence when that information has been directly supplied by the disclosing party
582:
103:
that outlines confidential material, knowledge, or information that the parties wish to share with one another for certain purposes, but wish to restrict access to.
389:, NDAs "are crucial". "Non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements ... are ... generally enforceable as long as they are reasonable." Sometimes NDAs have been
135:, the parties often sign a confidentiality agreement relating to the terms of the settlement. Examples of such agreements are The Dolby Trademark Agreement with
431:, which allows "protected disclosure" despite the existence of an NDA, although employers sometimes intimidate the former employee into silence despite this.
679:
700:
191:
introducing the possibility that a receiving party could later become a disclosing party or vice versa, which is not an entirely uncommon occurrence.
241:
the disclosure period – information not disclosed during the disclosure period (e.g., one year after the date of the NDA) is not deemed confidential;
1042:
1004:
244:
the exclusions from what must be kept confidential. Typically, the restrictions on the disclosure or use of confidential data will be invalid if
981:
947:
913:
879:
845:
811:
777:
743:
421:
1056:
UK: Too Wide a
Restriction on Contractual Non-Compete Clause Between Non-Competitors Breached EU Competition Law – Jones v Ricoh, High Court
428:
410:
1213:
1099:
513:
have signaled that they generally value an employee's mobility and entrepreneurship more highly than they do protectionist doctrine.
434:
In some legal cases where the conditions of a confidentiality agreement have been breached, the successful party may choose between
1208:
1184:
552:
104:
1188:
1174:
654:
353:
of confidentiality and fidelity (also referred to as deeds of confidentiality or confidentiality deeds) are commonly used in
527:
112:
108:
41:
226:
the definition of what is confidential, i.e. the information to be held confidential. Modern NDAs will typically include a
1170:
290:
the obligations of the recipient regarding the confidential information, typically including some version of obligations:
157:
A similar concept is expressed in the term "non-disparagement agreement", which prevents one party from stating anything '
510:
466:, which prohibits agreements which had the object or effect of distorting competition, and was therefore unenforceable.
458:
for a contract with a third party. Ricoh sought release from its obligations under the agreement via an application for
373:
knowledge through employee turnover in Indian IT firms". They are often used by companies from other countries who are
32:
390:
450:
in 2010, Jones brought an action against the photocopier Ricoh for breach of their confidentiality agreement when
522:
1218:
370:
127:. As such, an NDA protects non-public business information. Like all contracts, they cannot be enforced if the
1138:
609:
474:
NDAs are very common in the United States, with more than one-third of jobs in
America containing an NDA. The
357:. These documents generally serve the same purpose as and contain provisions similar to NDAs used elsewhere.
1074:"Biden signs law curbing nondisclosure agreements that block victims of sexual harassment from speaking out"
132:
942:. Elgar Intellectual Property Law and Practice series. Edward Elgar Publishing, Incorporated. p. 198.
1233:
475:
284:
description of the actions that need to be done with the confidential materials upon the agreement ending;
119:
agreements are examples of NDAs, which are often not enshrined in a written contract between the parties.
447:
37:
238:
information, verbal representations, customer lists, vendor lists, business practices/strategies, etc.;
455:
150:
In some cases, employees who are dismissed following their complaints about unacceptable practices (
1223:
715:
271:
the term and conditions (in years) of the confidentiality, i.e. the time period of confidentiality;
684:
Second, the use of confidentiality agreements can prevent the forfeiture of valuable patent rights
1143:
869:
671:
547:
502:
231:
136:
385:
to India use them, and Indian companies in pharmaceuticals are "competent" in their use. In the
977:
943:
937:
909:
903:
875:
841:
807:
801:
773:
739:
579:"Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Clauses in Commercial Contracts – Is it worth the Effort?"
557:
506:
483:
420:) confirmed that a confidentiality agreement will be interpreted as a contract subject to the
382:
265:
264:
provisions restricting the transfer of data in violation of laws governing export control and
169:
A non-disclosure agreement (NDA) may be classified as unilateral, bilateral, or multilateral:
128:
971:
835:
767:
1228:
459:
140:
1118:
1103:
17:
1009:
871:
Competitive
Conditions for Foreign Direct Investment in India, Staff Research Study #30
487:
402:
386:
772:. World Scientific series on 21st century business. World Scientific Pub. p. 46.
369:. They have been described as "an increasingly popular way of restricting the loss of
296:
to disclose it only to persons with a need to know the information for those purposes;
1202:
537:
479:
326:
governing the parties. The parties may choose exclusive jurisdiction of a court of a
151:
227:
532:
323:
124:
116:
45:
1100:"The Impact of the Mark Hurd Saga on California's Ban on Covenants Not to Compete"
733:
1024:
416:
374:
316:
100:
655:
Director Paul
Schrader Says His New Nicolas Cage Movie "Was Taken Away From Me"
250:
the recipient gained subsequent knowledge of the materials from another source;
498:
381:
work to companies in India. Companies outsourcing research and development of
378:
278:
158:
1148:
542:
491:
354:
144:
840:. Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomedicine. Elsevier Science. p. 13.
40:
maintain client privacy through confidentiality agreements. Some, akin to
406:
257:
96:
908:. Management for Professionals. Springer Nature Singapore. p. 107.
1043:
VC firm accused of stealing business plan must pay damages, not profits
435:
327:
235:
464:
Article 101 of the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union
451:
366:
350:
223:
whether confidential information must be labeled as confidential
939:
Trade
Secrecy and International Transactions: Law and Practice
312:
93:
1171:
Confidentiality and
Confidential Disclosure Agreements (CDA)
1139:"How the NDA became the defining legal document of our time"
311:
types of permissible disclosure – such as those required by
27:
Contractual agreement not to disclose specified information
230:
of types of items that are covered, including unpublished
697:"Intellectual Property: Using Confidentiality Agreements"
640:
Department for
Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy
714:
Hanson, by Mark J.; Thompson, Joe R.; Dahlgren, Joel J.
253:
the materials are generally available to the public; or
610:"Confidentiality Provisions in Settlement Agreements"
293:
to use the information only for enumerated purposes;
1045:, published 29 March 2010, accessed 6 November 2023
247:
the recipient had prior knowledge of the materials;
1185:Information about non-disclosure-agreements (NDAs)
727:
725:
501:, have special circumstances relating to NDAs and
1062:, published 27 July 2010, accessed 5 October 2023
659:, published 16 October 2014, accessed 6 July 2023
1025:"UK universities face 'gagging order' criticism"
1013:, published 19 April 2013, accessed 27 July 2023
970:Bharadwaj, A.; Devaiah, V.H.; Gupta, I. (2022).
490:, and the bill was signed into law by President
216:Some common issues addressed in an NDA include:
718:. Iowa State University Extension and Outreach.
769:Indian Economic Superpower: Fiction Or Future?
905:Doing Business in India: The PESTEL Framework
424:which generally apply in the English courts.
274:the term (in years) the agreement is binding;
8:
973:Locating Legal Certainty in Patent Licensing
680:The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society
806:. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p. 120.
482:in 2022, which prohibits them in regard to
336:who owns or has rights over the information
99:or part of a contract between at least two
735:The Oxford Companion to Economics in India
672:"Understanding Confidentiality Agreements"
333:whether or not juries, arbitration allowed
976:. Springer Nature Singapore. p. 91.
631:"Consultation on Confidentiality Clauses"
625:
623:
139:, the Windows Insider Agreement, and the
738:. Oxford University Press. p. 327.
716:"Overview of Confidentiality Agreements"
581:. Real Estate Drill Down. Archived from
31:
1005:Back-to-back confidentiality agreements
803:Outsourcing to India - A Legal Handbook
699:. Yahoo! Small Business. Archived from
569:
287:what/when it can be modified by a court
220:outlining the parties to the agreement;
1072:Price, Michelle L. (7 December 2022).
837:Outsourcing Biopharma R&D to India
393:and this has led to legal challenges.
143:CFP (Community Feedback Program) with
7:
1119:"NDA Experiment Set up by Mark Hurd"
874:. DIANE Publishing. p. 8-PA14.
429:Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998
422:rules of contractual interpretation
936:Rowe, E.A.; Sandeen, S.K. (2015).
306:destruction or return upon request
25:
1023:Rianna Croxford (17 April 2019).
577:Henry Pharr III (17 March 2016).
129:contracted activities are illegal
78:proprietary information agreement
70:confidential disclosure agreement
1137:Wiedeman, Reeves (1 July 2024).
1117:Gromov, Gregory (October 2010).
1098:Chapman, Lisa (September 2010).
415:Dorchester Project Management v
341:Law and practice by jurisdiction
1189:UK Intellectual Property Office
1175:UK Intellectual Property Office
256:the materials are subject to a
107:(physician–patient privilege),
105:Doctor–patient confidentiality
1:
553:Physician–patient privilege
533:Bank–client confidentiality
117:bank–client confidentiality
1250:
766:Swaminathan, J.M. (2009).
279:ex-parte injunctive relief
1214:Intellectual property law
670:Radack, David V. (1994).
528:Attorney–client privilege
523:Arrow information paradox
161:' about the other party.
113:priest–penitent privilege
109:attorney–client privilege
62:confidentiality agreement
42:attorney–client privilege
834:Chowdhury, P.R. (2011).
657:, The Hollywood Reporter
54:non-disclosure agreement
18:Non disclosure agreement
1209:Information sensitivity
497:Some states, including
46:banker–client privilege
1173:booklet edited by the
902:Agarwal, A.K. (2022).
476:United States Congress
49:
868:Commission, U.S.I.T.
494:on December 7, 2022.
277:permission to obtain
35:
1106:on 14 February 2017.
800:Vagadia, B. (2007).
234:, know-how, schema,
38:banking institutions
608:Joe Davies (2014).
507:California's courts
503:non-compete clauses
232:patent applications
187:venture or merger.
60:), also known as a
612:. Vann Attorneys.
548:Non-compete clause
137:Dolby Laboratories
50:
1187:published by the
1147:. New York City:
983:978-981-15-0181-4
949:978-1-78254-078-6
915:978-981-16-9045-7
881:978-1-4578-1829-5
847:978-1-908818-01-0
813:978-3-540-72220-5
779:978-981-281-465-4
745:978-0-19-566984-8
732:Basu, K. (2007).
703:on 23 March 2009.
585:on 26 August 2018
558:Severance package
484:sexual harassment
365:NDAs are used in
266:national security
86:secrecy agreement
16:(Redirected from
1241:
1159:
1157:
1155:
1123:
1122:
1114:
1108:
1107:
1102:. Archived from
1095:
1089:
1088:
1086:
1084:
1069:
1063:
1054:Gerschlick, P.,
1052:
1046:
1041:Pinsent Masons,
1039:
1033:
1032:
1020:
1014:
1001:
995:
994:
992:
990:
967:
961:
960:
958:
956:
933:
927:
926:
924:
922:
899:
893:
892:
890:
888:
865:
859:
858:
856:
854:
831:
825:
824:
822:
820:
797:
791:
790:
788:
786:
763:
757:
756:
754:
752:
729:
720:
719:
711:
705:
704:
693:
687:
686:
667:
661:
651:
645:
644:
635:
627:
618:
617:
605:
599:
598:
592:
590:
574:
460:summary judgment
391:anti-competitive
21:
1249:
1248:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1219:Legal documents
1199:
1198:
1167:
1162:
1153:
1151:
1136:
1132:
1130:Further reading
1127:
1126:
1116:
1115:
1111:
1097:
1096:
1092:
1082:
1080:
1071:
1070:
1066:
1053:
1049:
1040:
1036:
1022:
1021:
1017:
1002:
998:
988:
986:
984:
969:
968:
964:
954:
952:
950:
935:
934:
930:
920:
918:
916:
901:
900:
896:
886:
884:
882:
867:
866:
862:
852:
850:
848:
833:
832:
828:
818:
816:
814:
799:
798:
794:
784:
782:
780:
765:
764:
760:
750:
748:
746:
731:
730:
723:
713:
712:
708:
695:
694:
690:
669:
668:
664:
652:
648:
633:
629:
628:
621:
607:
606:
602:
588:
586:
576:
575:
571:
566:
519:
472:
446:, heard by the
411:Court of Appeal
399:
363:
348:
343:
210:
197:
184:
175:
167:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1247:
1245:
1237:
1236:
1231:
1226:
1221:
1216:
1211:
1201:
1200:
1197:
1196:
1182:
1166:
1165:External links
1163:
1161:
1160:
1133:
1131:
1128:
1125:
1124:
1109:
1090:
1064:
1047:
1034:
1015:
1010:Taylor Wessing
996:
982:
962:
948:
928:
914:
894:
880:
860:
846:
826:
812:
792:
778:
758:
744:
721:
706:
688:
662:
646:
619:
600:
568:
567:
565:
562:
561:
560:
555:
550:
545:
540:
535:
530:
525:
518:
515:
488:sexual assault
471:
468:
403:United Kingdom
398:
397:United Kingdom
395:
387:space industry
362:
359:
347:
344:
342:
339:
338:
337:
334:
331:
320:
309:
308:
307:
304:
301:
297:
294:
288:
285:
282:
275:
272:
269:
262:
261:
260:
254:
251:
248:
242:
239:
224:
221:
209:
206:
196:
193:
183:
180:
174:
171:
166:
163:
152:whistleblowers
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1246:
1235:
1234:Trade secrets
1232:
1230:
1227:
1225:
1222:
1220:
1217:
1215:
1212:
1210:
1207:
1206:
1204:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1183:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1169:
1168:
1164:
1150:
1146:
1145:
1140:
1135:
1134:
1129:
1120:
1113:
1110:
1105:
1101:
1094:
1091:
1079:
1075:
1068:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1051:
1048:
1044:
1038:
1035:
1030:
1026:
1019:
1016:
1012:
1011:
1006:
1000:
997:
985:
979:
975:
974:
966:
963:
951:
945:
941:
940:
932:
929:
917:
911:
907:
906:
898:
895:
883:
877:
873:
872:
864:
861:
849:
843:
839:
838:
830:
827:
815:
809:
805:
804:
796:
793:
781:
775:
771:
770:
762:
759:
747:
741:
737:
736:
728:
726:
722:
717:
710:
707:
702:
698:
692:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
666:
663:
660:
656:
650:
647:
643:. March 2019.
642:
641:
632:
626:
624:
620:
616:
611:
604:
601:
597:
584:
580:
573:
570:
563:
559:
556:
554:
551:
549:
546:
544:
541:
539:
538:Due diligence
536:
534:
531:
529:
526:
524:
521:
520:
516:
514:
512:
508:
504:
500:
495:
493:
489:
485:
481:
480:Speak Out Act
477:
470:United States
469:
467:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
444:Jones v Ricoh
440:
437:
432:
430:
425:
423:
419:
418:
412:
408:
404:
396:
394:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
360:
358:
356:
352:
345:
340:
335:
332:
329:
325:
321:
318:
314:
310:
305:
302:
298:
295:
292:
291:
289:
286:
283:
280:
276:
273:
270:
267:
263:
259:
255:
252:
249:
246:
245:
243:
240:
237:
233:
229:
225:
222:
219:
218:
217:
214:
207:
205:
201:
194:
192:
188:
181:
179:
172:
170:
165:General types
164:
162:
160:
155:
153:
148:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
125:trade secrets
120:
118:
114:
110:
106:
102:
98:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
63:
59:
55:
47:
43:
39:
34:
30:
19:
1192:
1178:
1152:. Retrieved
1142:
1121:. NetValley.
1112:
1104:the original
1093:
1081:. Retrieved
1077:
1067:
1059:
1050:
1037:
1028:
1018:
1008:
1003:Howell, A.,
999:
987:. Retrieved
972:
965:
953:. Retrieved
938:
931:
919:. Retrieved
904:
897:
885:. Retrieved
870:
863:
851:. Retrieved
836:
829:
817:. Retrieved
802:
795:
783:. Retrieved
768:
761:
749:. Retrieved
734:
709:
701:the original
691:
683:
675:
665:
658:
653:Kilday, G.,
649:
637:
613:
603:
594:
587:. Retrieved
583:the original
572:
496:
473:
454:submitted a
443:
441:
433:
426:
414:
400:
364:
349:
324:jurisdiction
322:the law and
228:laundry list
215:
211:
202:
198:
195:Multilateral
189:
185:
176:
168:
156:
149:
121:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
65:
61:
57:
53:
51:
29:
511:legislature
478:passed the
417:BNP Paribas
375:outsourcing
317:court order
1224:Labour law
1203:Categories
1193:2018-01-15
1083:7 December
589:8 February
564:References
499:California
448:High Court
413:decision (
409:in a 2013
379:offshoring
173:Unilateral
159:derogatory
133:settlement
1149:Vox Media
543:Gag order
492:Joe Biden
383:biopharma
355:Australia
346:Australia
236:financial
182:Bilateral
145:Microsoft
1029:BBC News
596:actions.
517:See also
407:Case law
258:subpoena
97:contract
92:), is a
44:, offer
1229:Secrecy
1179:2005-01
1144:The Cut
615:reason.
436:damages
401:In the
371:R&D
328:country
208:Content
101:parties
1154:2 July
1060:Mondaq
989:2 July
980:
955:2 July
946:
921:2 July
912:
887:2 July
878:
853:2 July
844:
819:2 July
810:
785:2 July
776:
751:2 July
742:
456:tender
84:), or
634:(PDF)
452:Ricoh
367:India
361:India
351:Deeds
94:legal
36:Many
1156:2024
1085:2022
991:2023
978:ISBN
957:2023
944:ISBN
923:2023
910:ISBN
889:2023
876:ISBN
855:2023
842:ISBN
821:2023
808:ISBN
787:2023
774:ISBN
753:2023
740:ISBN
591:2018
509:and
486:and
141:Halo
115:and
1191:- (
1177:- (
1078:PBS
676:JOM
638:UK
377:or
315:or
313:law
300:and
82:PIA
76:),
74:CDA
68:),
58:NDA
1205::
1141:.
1076:.
1058:,
1027:.
1007:,
724:^
682:.
678:.
674:.
636:.
622:^
593:.
505:.
147:.
111:,
90:SA
66:CA
52:A
1195:)
1181:)
1158:.
1087:.
1031:.
993:.
959:.
925:.
891:.
857:.
823:.
789:.
755:.
330:.
281:;
268:;
88:(
80:(
72:(
64:(
56:(
48:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
