Knowledge (XXG)

Not invented here

Source đź“ť

1407: 87:
provides empirical evidence for the "not invented here" syndrome, showing that the performance of R&D project groups declines after about five years, which they attribute to the groups becoming increasingly insular and communicating less with key information sources outside the group.
300: 220:
Piezunka, Henning; Dahlander, Linus (26 June 2014). "Distant Search, Narrow Attention: How Crowding Alters Organizations' Filtering of Suggestions in Crowdsourcing".
524: 64:. As a social phenomenon, this tendency can manifest itself as an unwillingness to adopt an idea or product because it originates from another culture, a form of 529: 1436: 351:"Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups" 256: 907: 564: 406: 718: 283: 44:
The reasons for not wanting to use the work of others are varied, but can include a desire to support a local economy instead of
1326: 534: 1362: 1338: 927: 1431: 939: 683: 198: 56:, lack of understanding of the foreign work, an unwillingness to acknowledge or value the work of others, jealousy, 949: 1441: 1357: 914: 810: 75:
sense. The opposite predisposition is sometimes called "proudly found elsewhere" (PFE) or "invented elsewhere".
1352: 1192: 660: 496: 452: 173: 1372: 1187: 703: 399: 1294: 1284: 1234: 1208: 984: 858: 825: 726: 708: 608: 457: 439: 350: 1332: 1320: 1300: 1289: 1204: 1017: 993: 815: 771: 623: 549: 462: 183: 142: 1347: 1251: 1215: 1130: 1086: 922: 853: 643: 472: 447: 1225: 1124: 1071: 1047: 970: 873: 805: 731: 544: 539: 516: 491: 162: 108: 57: 53: 1410: 1343: 1157: 1042: 1027: 974: 934: 883: 820: 779: 756: 736: 639: 483: 467: 392: 20: 41:, or institutional cultures. Research illustrates a strong bias against ideas from the outside. 1229: 1066: 1032: 1009: 965: 891: 843: 801: 761: 603: 598: 420: 370: 279: 273: 252: 113: 38: 1379: 1220: 1119: 1061: 999: 794: 673: 668: 653: 618: 578: 506: 501: 362: 229: 188: 131: 1100: 1076: 896: 868: 848: 696: 664: 648: 325: 147: 103: 84: 45: 1136: 613: 1037: 1022: 944: 863: 789: 429: 366: 1425: 1162: 1052: 784: 747: 691: 559: 554: 178: 167: 137: 1174: 593: 98: 37:, standards, or knowledge from external origins. It is usually adopted by social, 1367: 1144: 1081: 157: 126: 1277: 1271: 1198: 1110: 193: 152: 121: 72: 374: 68:
and/or an inadequate effort in choosing the right approach for the business.
1384: 1168: 1152: 835: 301:"Build Vs. Buy: Why Most Businesses Should Buy Their Next Software Solution" 65: 61: 1314: 384: 233: 1262: 34: 416: 49: 388: 134: – ascribing higher value to what is one's own 249:
The Innovation Playbook: A Revolution in Business Excellence
16:
Type of management attitude toward innovation or development
278:. Vol. 3. Cambridge University Press. p. 100. 33:) is the tendency to avoid using or buying products, 170: – opposite. Not invented there (NIT) 1261: 1249: 1108: 1099: 1008: 983: 958: 882: 834: 770: 745: 717: 682: 632: 586: 577: 515: 481: 437: 428: 275:The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain 525:Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise 349:Katz, Ralph; Allen, Thomas J. (January 1982). 530:Negative conclusion from affirmative premises 400: 272:Floud, Roderick; Johnson, Paul, eds. (2003). 8: 324:Huston, Larry; Sakkab, Nabil (2006-03-20). 1258: 1105: 980: 583: 434: 407: 393: 385: 247:Webb, Nicholas J.; Thoen, Chris (2010). 212: 7: 1437:Economics of intellectual property 367:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1982.tb00478.x 14: 1406: 1405: 326:"P&G's New Innovation Model" 71:The term is typically used in a 83:A 1982 study by Ralph Katz and 903:Correlation implies causation 1: 222:Academy of Management Journal 60:, or forming part of a wider 1458: 1327:I'm entitled to my opinion 18: 1401: 1310: 1183: 299:Hagler, Bo (2020-03-04). 1353:Motte-and-bailey fallacy 453:Affirming the consequent 199:You aren't gonna need it 174:List of cognitive biases 19:Not to be confused with 1373:Two wrongs make a right 704:Denying the correlative 251:. John Wiley and Sons. 1358:Psychologist's fallacy 1295:Argument to moderation 1285:Argument from anecdote 1235:Chronological snobbery 859:Quoting out of context 826:Overwhelming exception 709:Suppressed correlative 609:Quoting out of context 484:quantificational logic 458:Denying the antecedent 1321:The Four Great Errors 1301:Argumentum ad populum 1290:Argument from silence 994:Argumentum ad baculum 772:Faulty generalization 463:Argument from fallacy 234:10.5465/amj.2012.0458 184:Reinventing the wheel 1339:Invincible ignorance 1145:Reductio ad Stalinum 1131:Reductio ad Hitlerum 1087:Wisdom of repugnance 854:Moving the goalposts 719:Illicit transference 644:Begging the question 565:Undistributed middle 473:Mathematical fallacy 448:Affirming a disjunct 1072:Parade of horribles 1048:In-group favoritism 874:Syntactic ambiguity 517:Syllogistic fallacy 440:propositional logic 163:In-group favoritism 109:Association fallacy 58:belief perseverance 54:patent infringement 1432:Appeals to emotion 1158:Poisoning the well 975:Proof by assertion 950:Texas sharpshooter 884:Questionable cause 821:Slothful induction 780:Anecdotal evidence 640:Circular reasoning 535:Exclusive premises 497:Illicit conversion 355:R&D Management 143:Galápagos syndrome 21:Not invented there 1419: 1418: 1397: 1396: 1393: 1392: 1333:Ignoratio elenchi 1245: 1244: 1095: 1094: 1057:Not invented here 762:Converse accident 684:Correlative-based 661:Compound question 604:False attribution 599:False equivalence 573: 572: 258:978-0-470-63796-8 52:-holder, fear of 27:Not invented here 1449: 1442:Cognitive biases 1409: 1408: 1380:Special pleading 1259: 1120:Appeal to motive 1106: 1082:Stirring symbols 1062:Island mentality 1000:Wishful thinking 981: 697:Perfect solution 674:No true Scotsman 669:Complex question 654:Leading question 633:Question-begging 619:No true Scotsman 584: 507:Quantifier shift 502:Proof by example 435: 409: 402: 395: 386: 379: 378: 346: 340: 339: 337: 336: 321: 315: 314: 312: 311: 296: 290: 289: 269: 263: 262: 244: 238: 237: 217: 189:Wishful thinking 132:Endowment effect 79:Scientific study 46:paying royalties 1457: 1456: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1415: 1389: 1363:Rationalization 1306: 1253: 1241: 1179: 1101:Genetic fallacy 1091: 1004: 979: 954: 878: 869:Sorites paradox 849:False precision 830: 811:Double counting 766: 741: 713: 678: 665:Loaded question 649:Loaded language 628: 569: 511: 477: 424: 413: 383: 382: 348: 347: 343: 334: 332: 323: 322: 318: 309: 307: 298: 297: 293: 286: 271: 270: 266: 259: 246: 245: 241: 219: 218: 214: 209: 204: 148:Genetic fallacy 104:Appeal to spite 94: 85:Thomas J. Allen 81: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1455: 1453: 1445: 1444: 1439: 1434: 1424: 1423: 1417: 1416: 1414: 1413: 1402: 1399: 1398: 1395: 1394: 1391: 1390: 1388: 1387: 1382: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1365: 1360: 1355: 1350: 1341: 1336: 1329: 1324: 1317: 1311: 1308: 1307: 1305: 1304: 1297: 1292: 1287: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1267: 1265: 1256: 1247: 1246: 1243: 1242: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1223: 1218: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1202: 1195: 1193:Accomplishment 1184: 1181: 1180: 1178: 1177: 1172: 1165: 1160: 1155: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1122: 1116: 1114: 1103: 1097: 1096: 1093: 1092: 1090: 1089: 1084: 1079: 1074: 1069: 1064: 1059: 1050: 1045: 1040: 1035: 1030: 1025: 1020: 1014: 1012: 1006: 1005: 1003: 1002: 997: 989: 987: 978: 977: 968: 962: 960: 956: 955: 953: 952: 947: 945:Slippery slope 942: 937: 932: 931: 930: 920: 919: 918: 911: 901: 900: 899: 888: 886: 880: 879: 877: 876: 871: 866: 864:Slippery slope 861: 856: 851: 846: 840: 838: 832: 831: 829: 828: 823: 818: 813: 808: 799: 798: 797: 792: 790:Cherry picking 782: 776: 774: 768: 767: 765: 764: 759: 753: 751: 743: 742: 740: 739: 734: 729: 723: 721: 715: 714: 712: 711: 706: 701: 700: 699: 688: 686: 680: 679: 677: 676: 671: 658: 657: 656: 646: 636: 634: 630: 629: 627: 626: 621: 616: 611: 606: 601: 596: 590: 588: 581: 575: 574: 571: 570: 568: 567: 562: 557: 552: 547: 542: 537: 532: 527: 521: 519: 513: 512: 510: 509: 504: 499: 494: 488: 486: 479: 478: 476: 475: 470: 465: 460: 455: 450: 444: 442: 432: 426: 425: 414: 412: 411: 404: 397: 389: 381: 380: 341: 316: 291: 284: 264: 257: 239: 228:(3): 856–880. 211: 210: 208: 205: 203: 202: 196: 191: 186: 181: 176: 171: 165: 160: 155: 150: 145: 140: 135: 129: 124: 119: 111: 106: 101: 95: 93: 90: 80: 77: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1454: 1443: 1440: 1438: 1435: 1433: 1430: 1429: 1427: 1412: 1404: 1403: 1400: 1386: 1383: 1381: 1378: 1374: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1366: 1364: 1361: 1359: 1356: 1354: 1351: 1349: 1345: 1342: 1340: 1337: 1335: 1334: 1330: 1328: 1325: 1323: 1322: 1318: 1316: 1313: 1312: 1309: 1303: 1302: 1298: 1296: 1293: 1291: 1288: 1286: 1283: 1279: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1269: 1268: 1266: 1264: 1260: 1257: 1255: 1248: 1236: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1227: 1224: 1222: 1219: 1217: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1203: 1201: 1200: 1196: 1194: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1186: 1185: 1182: 1176: 1173: 1171: 1170: 1166: 1164: 1161: 1159: 1156: 1154: 1151: 1147: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1123: 1121: 1118: 1117: 1115: 1113: 1112: 1107: 1104: 1102: 1098: 1088: 1085: 1083: 1080: 1078: 1075: 1073: 1070: 1068: 1065: 1063: 1060: 1058: 1054: 1053:Invented here 1051: 1049: 1046: 1044: 1041: 1039: 1036: 1034: 1031: 1029: 1026: 1024: 1021: 1019: 1016: 1015: 1013: 1011: 1007: 1001: 998: 996: 995: 991: 990: 988: 986: 982: 976: 972: 969: 967: 964: 963: 961: 957: 951: 948: 946: 943: 941: 938: 936: 933: 929: 926: 925: 924: 921: 917: 916: 912: 910: 909: 905: 904: 902: 898: 895: 894: 893: 890: 889: 887: 885: 881: 875: 872: 870: 867: 865: 862: 860: 857: 855: 852: 850: 847: 845: 842: 841: 839: 837: 833: 827: 824: 822: 819: 817: 816:False analogy 814: 812: 809: 807: 803: 800: 796: 793: 791: 788: 787: 786: 785:Sampling bias 783: 781: 778: 777: 775: 773: 769: 763: 760: 758: 755: 754: 752: 750: 749: 748:Secundum quid 744: 738: 735: 733: 730: 728: 725: 724: 722: 720: 716: 710: 707: 705: 702: 698: 695: 694: 693: 692:False dilemma 690: 689: 687: 685: 681: 675: 672: 670: 666: 662: 659: 655: 652: 651: 650: 647: 645: 641: 638: 637: 635: 631: 625: 622: 620: 617: 615: 612: 610: 607: 605: 602: 600: 597: 595: 592: 591: 589: 585: 582: 580: 576: 566: 563: 561: 560:Illicit minor 558: 556: 555:Illicit major 553: 551: 548: 546: 543: 541: 538: 536: 533: 531: 528: 526: 523: 522: 520: 518: 514: 508: 505: 503: 500: 498: 495: 493: 490: 489: 487: 485: 480: 474: 471: 469: 466: 464: 461: 459: 456: 454: 451: 449: 446: 445: 443: 441: 436: 433: 431: 427: 422: 418: 410: 405: 403: 398: 396: 391: 390: 387: 376: 372: 368: 364: 360: 356: 352: 345: 342: 331: 330:hbswk.hbs.edu 327: 320: 317: 306: 302: 295: 292: 287: 285:9780521527385 281: 277: 276: 268: 265: 260: 254: 250: 243: 240: 235: 231: 227: 223: 216: 213: 206: 200: 197: 195: 192: 190: 187: 185: 182: 180: 179:Protectionism 177: 175: 172: 169: 168:Invented here 166: 164: 161: 159: 156: 154: 151: 149: 146: 144: 141: 139: 138:Ethnocentrism 136: 133: 130: 128: 125: 123: 120: 118: 116: 112: 110: 107: 105: 102: 100: 97: 96: 91: 89: 86: 78: 76: 74: 69: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 48:to a foreign 47: 42: 40: 36: 32: 28: 22: 1348:Naturalistic 1331: 1319: 1299: 1270: 1254:of relevance 1197: 1175:Whataboutism 1167: 1143: 1137:Godwin's law 1129: 1109: 1056: 992: 985:Consequences 966:Law/Legality 940:Single cause 913: 906: 746: 614:Loki's Wager 594:Equivocation 587:Equivocation 358: 354: 344: 333:. Retrieved 329: 319: 308:. Retrieved 304: 294: 274: 267: 248: 242: 225: 221: 215: 114: 99:Anti-pattern 82: 70: 43: 30: 26: 25: 1368:Red herring 1125:Association 806:Conjunction 727:Composition 624:Reification 540:Existential 492:Existential 361:(1): 7–20. 158:IKEA effect 127:Editor wars 1426:Categories 1344:Moralistic 1278:Sealioning 1272:Ad nauseam 1199:Ipse dixit 1111:Ad hominem 935:Regression 737:Ecological 550:Four terms 468:Masked man 335:2020-04-18 310:2021-10-29 207:References 194:Xenophobia 153:Groupthink 122:Dogfooding 73:pejorative 1385:Straw man 1263:Arguments 1252:fallacies 1226:Tradition 1216:Etymology 1188:Authority 1169:Tu quoque 1153:Bulverism 923:Gambler's 892:Animistic 836:Ambiguity 802:Base rate 545:Necessity 417:fallacies 375:0033-6807 66:tribalism 39:corporate 1411:Category 1043:Ridicule 1028:Flattery 1018:Children 915:Post hoc 795:McNamara 757:Accident 732:Division 579:Informal 117:standard 115:De facto 92:See also 62:turf war 35:research 1230:Novelty 1205:Poverty 1067:Loyalty 1033:Novelty 1010:Emotion 959:Appeals 928:Inverse 908:Cum hoc 897:Furtive 415:Common 201:(YAGNI) 50:license 1315:ClichĂ© 1250:Other 1221:Nature 1209:Wealth 844:Accent 430:Formal 373:  305:Forbes 282:  255:  1077:Spite 971:Stone 1163:Tone 1038:Pity 1023:Fear 421:list 371:ISSN 280:ISBN 253:ISBN 482:In 438:In 363:doi 230:doi 31:NIH 1428:: 1346:/ 1228:/ 1207:/ 1055:/ 973:/ 804:/ 667:/ 663:/ 642:/ 369:. 359:12 357:. 353:. 328:. 303:. 226:58 224:. 423:) 419:( 408:e 401:t 394:v 377:. 365:: 338:. 313:. 288:. 261:. 236:. 232:: 29:( 23:.

Index

Not invented there
research
corporate
paying royalties
license
patent infringement
belief perseverance
turf war
tribalism
pejorative
Thomas J. Allen
Anti-pattern
Appeal to spite
Association fallacy
De facto standard
Dogfooding
Editor wars
Endowment effect
Ethnocentrism
Galápagos syndrome
Genetic fallacy
Groupthink
IKEA effect
In-group favoritism
Invented here
List of cognitive biases
Protectionism
Reinventing the wheel
Wishful thinking
Xenophobia

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑