136:
construed. To put it another way, the coronary which left him unable to work again was an unexpected occurrence which made his performance of his contractual obligation – to work – impossible and brought about such a change in the significance of the mutual obligations that the contract, if performed, would be a different thing from that contracted for... Accordingly though I feel much sympathy with the employee in that his working life has been cut short by illness or incapacity, I would dismiss the appeal.
31:
135:
when more than six months later the doctor made his report, both parties appreciated, on the judge’s findings, that he was not going to work again. He was totally incapacitated from performing the contract. That was a situation which, in my judgment, was outside the scope of the contract properly
106:. The doctor said it was unlikely he would ever work again. His employers gave the statutory 12-week notice to terminate his contract, but made no payment of wages on the ground that the employee was not entitled to sick pay. Mr Notcutt sued under
110:
section 88(1)(b) which says that normal wages must be paid in the period of notice if an employee is incapable of work due to sickness. Then the employer argued the contract was frustrated.
182:
131:
held a contract was frustrated when a man was sentenced to 12 months prison, on a supposed analogy with someone that was grievously injured an incapacitated in a road accident.
553:
445:
166:
107:
429:
185:
558:
543:
485:
213:
293:
253:
159:
548:
319:
267:
401:
333:
387:
152:
361:
190:
128:
347:
415:
241:
479:
199:
91:
69:
123:
373:
307:
281:
474:
83:
227:
30:
506:
351:
323:
463:
337:
377:
271:
405:
297:
257:
537:
459:
203:
87:
435:
231:
217:
103:
419:
391:
118:
144:
148:
63:
53:
45:
37:
23:
121:held the contract was frustrated. He referred to
507:"Employment Protection (Consolidation) Act 1978"
447:Nelson v British Broadcasting Corporation (No 2)
133:
108:Employment Protection (Consolidation) Act 1978
160:
79:Notcutt v Universal Equipment Co (London) Ltd
8:
431:Dunnachie v Kingston-upon-Hull City Council
16:English contract law and UK labour law case
187:Termination of Employment Convention, 1982
167:
153:
145:
29:
20:
554:Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases
498:
486:Igbo v Johnson, Matthey Chemicals Ltd
214:R (Seymour-Smith) v SS for Employment
7:
294:Notcutt v Universal Equipment Co Ltd
254:Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp
24:Notcutt v Universal Equipment Co Ltd
320:British Home Stores Ltd v Burchell
14:
268:Buckland v Bournemouth University
402:Port of London Authority v Payne
334:Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones
559:1986 in United Kingdom case law
388:Polkey v AE Dayton Services Ltd
544:United Kingdom labour case law
362:British Leyland UK Ltd v Swift
1:
348:Williams v Compair Maxam Ltd
416:Norton Tool Co Ltd v Tewson
242:Kwik-Fit (GB) Ltd v Lineham
575:
480:Frustration in English law
200:Employment Rights Act 1996
124:Hare v Murphy Brothers Ltd
549:English contract case law
456:
442:
426:
412:
398:
384:
370:
358:
344:
330:
316:
304:
290:
278:
264:
250:
238:
224:
210:
197:
180:
68:
58:
28:
374:HSBC Bank plc v Madden
308:Ford v Warwickshire CC
175:Unfair dismissal cases
138:
90:case, concerning the
475:English contract law
84:English contract law
282:Adamas Ltd v Cheung
228:Gisda Cyf v Barratt
470:
469:
102:Mr Notcutt had a
94:of an agreement.
75:
74:
566:
520:
517:
511:
510:
503:
464:unfair dismissal
448:
432:
188:
169:
162:
155:
146:
33:
21:
574:
573:
569:
568:
567:
565:
564:
563:
534:
533:
528:
523:
518:
514:
505:
504:
500:
496:
471:
466:
452:
446:
438:
430:
422:
408:
394:
380:
366:
354:
340:
326:
312:
300:
286:
274:
260:
246:
234:
220:
206:
193:
186:
176:
173:
143:
129:Lord Denning MR
116:
100:
41:Court of Appeal
17:
12:
11:
5:
572:
570:
562:
561:
556:
551:
546:
536:
535:
532:
531:
527:
524:
522:
521:
512:
497:
495:
492:
491:
490:
482:
477:
468:
467:
457:
454:
453:
443:
440:
439:
427:
424:
423:
413:
410:
409:
399:
396:
395:
385:
382:
381:
371:
368:
367:
359:
356:
355:
345:
342:
341:
331:
328:
327:
317:
314:
313:
305:
302:
301:
291:
288:
287:
279:
276:
275:
265:
262:
261:
251:
248:
247:
239:
236:
235:
225:
222:
221:
211:
208:
207:
198:
195:
194:
181:
178:
177:
174:
172:
171:
164:
157:
149:
142:
139:
115:
112:
99:
96:
82:ICR 414 is an
73:
72:
66:
65:
61:
60:
56:
55:
51:
50:
47:
43:
42:
39:
35:
34:
26:
25:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
571:
560:
557:
555:
552:
550:
547:
545:
542:
541:
539:
530:
529:
525:
516:
513:
508:
502:
499:
493:
488:
487:
483:
481:
478:
476:
473:
472:
465:
461:
460:UK labour law
455:
450:
449:
441:
437:
434:
433:
425:
421:
418:
417:
411:
407:
404:
403:
397:
393:
390:
389:
383:
379:
378:EWCA Civ 3030
376:
375:
369:
364:
363:
357:
353:
350:
349:
343:
339:
336:
335:
329:
325:
322:
321:
315:
310:
309:
303:
299:
296:
295:
289:
284:
283:
277:
273:
270:
269:
263:
259:
256:
255:
249:
244:
243:
237:
233:
230:
229:
223:
219:
216:
215:
209:
205:
201:
196:
192:
189:
184:
179:
170:
165:
163:
158:
156:
151:
150:
147:
140:
137:
132:
130:
126:
125:
120:
113:
111:
109:
105:
97:
95:
93:
89:
88:UK labour law
85:
81:
80:
71:
67:
62:
57:
54:Case opinions
52:
48:
44:
40:
36:
32:
27:
22:
19:
515:
501:
484:
444:
428:
414:
400:
386:
372:
360:
346:
332:
318:
306:
292:
280:
272:EWCA Civ 121
266:
252:
240:
226:
212:
134:
122:
117:
104:heart attack
101:
78:
77:
76:
18:
406:EWCA Civ 26
92:frustration
70:Frustration
538:Categories
526:References
298:EWCA Civ 3
258:EWCA Civ 2
420:EW Misc 1
119:Dillon LJ
59:Dillon LJ
141:See also
114:Judgment
64:Keywords
46:Citation
519:ICR 603
489:ICR 505
451:ICR 110
436:UKHL 36
365:IRLR 91
352:ICR 156
324:ICR 303
311:2 AC 71
285:UKPC 32
245:ICR 183
232:UKSC 41
218:UKHL 12
49:ICR 414
392:UKHL 8
338:ICR 17
204:94-132
127:where
494:Notes
191:C 158
98:Facts
38:Court
462:and
458:see
86:and
202:ss
183:ILO
540::
509:.
168:e
161:t
154:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
