Knowledge (XXG)

Ohio v. EPA

Source đź“ť

29: 287:. The EPA argued that the plan contained important public benefits that if halted would cause delays in improving air quality that could be harmful. The EPA also argued that Ohio did not demonstrate any harm that would arise if the plan remained in effect while the legal proceedings continued. The Supreme Court did not put the EPA plan on hold while legal proceedings were underway. In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court decided that the EPA plan would be 322:
joined. They claimed that the EPA's methodology in their report was misreported and incorrect. They applied the Clean Air Act's section that allows a court to reverse a federal implementation plan if it is "arbitrary or capricious" and found in favor of Ohio.
101:(1) Whether the court should stay the Environmental Protection Agency’s federal emission reductions rule, the Good Neighbor Plan; and (2) whether the emissions controls imposed by the rule are reasonable regardless of the number of states subject to the rule. 1517: 901: 111:
The applications for a stay are granted; enforcement of EPA’s rule against the applicants shall be stayed pending the disposition of the applicants’ petition for review in the D. C. Circuit and any petition for writ of certiorari, timely
1119: 776: 1036: 1189: 909: 1453: 858: 1173: 1143: 1729: 2253: 1415: 1399: 1251: 917: 1533: 1323: 1873: 1970: 1501: 1485: 1469: 1461: 1407: 2149: 1075: 728: 247:. In the Clean Air Act, there is a section called the "Good Neighbor" provision, which mandates states to implement policies to reduce the impact of air pollution on other states, such as 712: 1785: 1181: 2278: 2211: 2128: 2116: 1963: 1423: 1267: 1691: 490: 77: 2036: 1939: 1779: 1909: 1891: 1549: 1509: 1020: 383: 2021: 1243: 1151: 996: 760: 549: 2263: 2031: 1275: 1197: 696: 2268: 2041: 2013: 1068: 1004: 256: 1976: 1956: 1259: 1028: 2283: 1897: 1213: 1205: 850: 267:(SIPs). In 2022, the EPA announced that it would be denying 23 states' SIPs. In response, the EPA proposed a Federal Implementation Plan that amended the 2248: 1299: 1291: 826: 752: 611: 941: 1649: 1612: 1061: 2258: 2184: 2046: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1012: 2139: 1982: 1879: 1867: 1541: 1343: 268: 346:. The dissent argued that the petition did not meet the criteria for emergency relief and that the case should be re-evaluated on its merits. 2227: 1748: 1525: 720: 1927: 1885: 973: 2199: 2051: 1361: 1307: 1221: 542: 1921: 1685: 1445: 1383: 1353: 1092: 260: 33: 1754: 1697: 1661: 1493: 1163: 2273: 2179: 2159: 2026: 1915: 1861: 1736: 558: 1815: 1772: 1084: 2106: 2086: 1797: 1742: 1624: 1391: 1373: 893: 818: 617: 535: 1135: 1715: 1233: 582: 240: 228: 214: 271:. The EPA had a right to do this under the Clean Air Act. Three plaintiffs, collectively referred to as "Ohio," filed an 1679: 933: 792: 605: 2144: 2091: 2061: 1944: 1766: 949: 877: 641: 1571: 885: 655: 623: 2134: 2071: 1950: 1933: 1803: 1709: 1673: 264: 2222: 2217: 2154: 1477: 2002: 1809: 685: 587: 61: 1667: 2122: 2111: 1996: 1989: 1703: 1579: 1111: 744: 494: 343: 179: 72: 1655: 2205: 1331: 1283: 965: 784: 2101: 2096: 1618: 1103: 768: 288: 434: 1127: 519: 2164: 1791: 1721: 1637: 834: 736: 331: 171: 283:
Ohio claimed that the EPA's federal implementation plan would put undue pressure on the U.S.
2081: 648: 1760: 1597: 1435: 1315: 957: 925: 661: 597: 501: 335: 319: 315: 284: 167: 147: 135: 2174: 842: 678: 2242: 2189: 2169: 244: 2076: 572: 527: 311: 307: 303: 159: 143: 127: 1053: 2194: 409: 339: 155: 1630: 1518:
Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Natural Resources Defense Council
577: 384:"Supreme Court Decides Ohio, et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al" 292: 252: 472:, www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23a349_0813.pdf. Accessed 29 June 2024. 1903: 1643: 1561: 227:, 603 U.S. ___ (2024), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding the 510: 89: 1190:
Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council
272: 248: 1730:
Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power Commission
1416:
Weyerhaeuser Company v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service
1400:
Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter of Communities for a Great Oregon
1057: 531: 28: 1534:
National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense
1486:
National Association of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife
1408:
National Association of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife
1324:
HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining v. Renewable Fuels Association
1502:
Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council
1470:
S. D. Warren Co. v. Maine Board of Environmental Protection
1462:
South Florida Water Management District v. Miccosukee Tribe
2150:
National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
729:
Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of Equalization
1182:
Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy
2254:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
1424:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service v. Sierra Club
1268:
Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. EPA
1144:
Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services
369:
www.oyez.org/cases/2023/23A349. Accessed 29 June 2024.
1940:
Alien Species Prevention and Enforcement Act of 1992
196:
Gorsuch, joined by Roberts, Alito, Thomas, Kavanaugh
2060: 2012: 1780:
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
1594: 1560: 1434: 1372: 1342: 1232: 1162: 1091: 988: 869: 810: 803: 704: 695: 670: 633: 596: 565: 208: 200: 192: 187: 116: 105: 95: 85: 67: 57: 52:
Ohio et al v. Environmental Protection Agency et al
47: 40: 21: 1910:Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act 1964:Coalition for Responsible Regulation, Inc. v. EPA 382:Jones, Bruce; Weymiller, Marcus (June 27, 2024). 2022:Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry 1786:Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act 1152:BP P.L.C. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore 408:Blum, Garry; Perrault, Griffin (June 29, 2024). 2032:National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1276:Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen 1198:Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen 2279:United States Environmental Protection Agency 2042:United States Environmental Protection Agency 1692:Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act 1069: 543: 8: 1252:Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council 204:Barrett, joined by Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson 1898:Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act 1214:Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council 1206:Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance 365:"Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency." 243:is a law intended to reduce the impacts of 1892:Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act 1300:American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut 1292:Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corp. 1244:Train v. Natural Resources Defense Council 1159: 1076: 1062: 1054: 827:Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe 807: 753:Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth 701: 550: 536: 528: 460:United States, U.S. Supreme Court (U.S.). 306:delivered the opinion of the court, which 18: 1650:North Pacific Fur Seal Convention of 1911 1619:Forest Service Organic Administration Act 1260:Whitman v. American Trucking Associations 435:"Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency" 410:"Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency" 1613:Yellowstone National Park Protection Act 2047:United States Fish and Wildlife Service 1013:Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital 462:Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency 355: 224:Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency 22:Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency 2140:National Ambient Air Quality Standards 1983:Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act 1880:Resource Conservation and Recovery Act 1868:Hazardous Materials Transportation Act 1542:County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund 269:National Ambient Air Quality Standards 2264:United States administrative case law 2228:Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action 1749:Environmental Quality Improvement Act 1526:Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co. 1136:Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation 16:2024 United States Supreme Court case 7: 2269:United States environmental case law 1957:Energy Independence and Security Act 1928:National Environmental Education Act 974:Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo 456: 454: 377: 375: 361: 359: 2200:Significant New Alternatives Policy 2052:U.S. Global Change Research Program 1362:Southern Union Co. v. United States 1308:Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA 1222:Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms 2284:Air pollution in the United States 1977:America's Water Infrastructure Act 1967:(D.C. Cir. Court of Appeals, 2012) 1686:Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act 1446:United States v. Riverside Bayview 1384:Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill 1354:City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey 259:set new standard for reduction of 34:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 2249:United States Supreme Court cases 1993:(5th Cir. Court of Appeals, 2022) 1755:National Environmental Policy Act 1733:(2nd Cir. Court of Appeals, 1965) 1494:Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper Inc. 1454:SWANCC v. Army Corps of Engineers 497:___ (2024) is available from: 334:delivered the dissent, joined by 263:. This required states to submit 2180:Presidential Climate Action Plan 2160:New Source Performance Standards 2027:Council on Environmental Quality 1916:Emergency Wetlands Resources Act 559:United States administrative law 291:pending petition for review and 27: 1816:Water Resources Development Act 1773:Coastal Zone Management Program 1085:United States environmental law 257:Environmental Protection Agency 2259:2024 in United States case law 2107:Environmental impact statement 2087:Corporate average fuel economy 1971:Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act 1392:Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife 894:Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB 819:Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner 618:Government in the Sunshine Act 1: 1886:Toxic Substances Control Act 934:Christensen v. Harris County 793:Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co. 606:Administrative Procedure Act 520:Supreme Court (slip opinion) 2145:National Climate Assessment 2092:Discharge Monitoring Report 1945:Food Quality Protection Act 1767:Coastal Zone Management Act 950:United States v. Mead Corp. 886:Skidmore v. Swift & Co. 878:NLRB v. Hearst Publications 642:Code of Federal Regulations 2300: 1922:Global Change Research Act 1572:United States v. Bestfoods 656:Emergency Federal Register 624:Regulatory Flexibility Act 612:Freedom of Information Act 511:Oyez (oral argument audio) 468:, vol. 603, 27 June 2024. 265:State Implementation Plans 2195:Section 608 Certification 2135:Maximum contaminant level 2072:Best available technology 1718:(1963, 1970, 1977, 1990) 1698:Air Pollution Control Act 1662:Migratory Bird Treaty Act 213: 121: 110: 100: 26: 2223:Toxicity category rating 2218:Total maximum daily load 2155:National Priorities List 2037:Office of Surface Mining 1862:Federal Noxious Weed Act 1763:(1972, 1977, 1987, 2014) 1737:Solid Waste Disposal Act 1478:Rapanos v. United States 41:Argued February 21, 2024 2274:2024 in the environment 2185:Renewable Fuel Standard 2003:Inflation Reduction Act 1810:Safe Drinking Water Act 697:Supreme Court decisions 255:. In October 2015, the 1798:Endangered Species Act 1743:Endangered Species Act 1625:Rivers and Harbors Act 1174:United States v. SCRAP 1120:Vermont Yankee v. NRDC 777:Vermont Yankee v. NRDC 761:United States v. FECRC 686:Foreign Affairs Manual 588:Nondelegation doctrine 275:to the Supreme Court. 2123:Executive Order 13990 2117:Executive Order 13432 2112:Environmental justice 1997:CHIPS and Science Act 1704:Fish and Wildlife Act 1580:Guam v. United States 1112:Sierra Club v. Morton 745:Richardson v. Perales 466:United States Reports 344:Ketanji Brown Jackson 180:Ketanji Brown Jackson 43:Decided June 27, 2024 2206:State of the Climate 1874:Magnuson–Stevens Act 1680:McSweeney-McNary Act 1332:West Virginia v. EPA 1284:Massachusetts v. EPA 966:West Virginia v. EPA 785:Califano v. Yamasaki 671:Policies and manuals 2170:Not-To-Exceed (NTE) 2102:Environmental crime 2097:Effluent guidelines 1858:, 2014, 2016, 2022) 1598:federal legislation 1104:Missouri v. Holland 769:Mathews v. Eldridge 598:Federal legislation 96:Questions presented 1990:Louisiana v. Biden 1904:CERCLA (Superfund) 1812:(1974, 1986, 1996) 1128:Hughes v. Oklahoma 902:MVMA v. State Farm 859:Corner Post v. FRB 721:Londoner v. Denver 713:CMSPR v. Minnesota 293:writ of certiorari 239:The United States 132:Associate Justices 2236: 2235: 2165:New Source Review 1951:Energy Policy Act 1934:Oil Pollution Act 1804:Oil Pollution Act 1792:Noise Control Act 1722:Acid Rain Program 1710:Oil Pollution Act 1674:Oil Pollution Act 1668:Clarke–McNary Act 1590: 1589: 1550:Sackett v. EPA II 1051: 1050: 1047: 1046: 984: 983: 835:Heckler v. Chaney 737:Goldberg v. Kelly 332:Amy Coney Barrett 220: 219: 172:Amy Coney Barrett 2291: 2082:Clean Power Plan 2014:Federal agencies 1656:Weeks–McLean Act 1510:Sackett v. EPA I 1160: 1078: 1071: 1064: 1055: 808: 702: 649:Federal Register 552: 545: 538: 529: 524: 518: 515: 509: 506: 500: 473: 458: 449: 448: 446: 445: 431: 425: 424: 422: 420: 405: 399: 398: 396: 394: 379: 370: 363: 299:Majority opinion 273:emergency appeal 117:Court membership 31: 30: 19: 2299: 2298: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2232: 2064: 2056: 2008: 1761:Clean Water Act 1605: 1604:and lower court 1603: 1601: 1596: 1586: 1556: 1430: 1368: 1338: 1316:Michigan v. EPA 1228: 1158: 1095: 1087: 1082: 1052: 1043: 1037:NCTA v. Brand X 980: 958:Kisor v. Wilkie 926:Auer v. Robbins 918:Chevron v. NRDC 865: 804:Judicial Review 799: 691: 666: 662:Regulations.gov 629: 592: 561: 556: 522: 516: 513: 507: 504: 498: 482: 477: 476: 459: 452: 443: 441: 433: 432: 428: 418: 416: 407: 406: 402: 392: 390: 381: 380: 373: 364: 357: 352: 336:Sonia Sotomayor 329: 320:Brett Kavanaugh 316:Clarence Thomas 301: 285:electrical grid 281: 261:ozone pollution 237: 170: 168:Brett Kavanaugh 158: 148:Sonia Sotomayor 146: 136:Clarence Thomas 42: 36: 17: 12: 11: 5: 2297: 2295: 2287: 2286: 2281: 2276: 2271: 2266: 2261: 2256: 2251: 2241: 2240: 2234: 2233: 2231: 2230: 2225: 2220: 2215: 2212:Tailoring Rule 2209: 2202: 2197: 2192: 2187: 2182: 2177: 2175:PACE financing 2172: 2167: 2162: 2157: 2152: 2147: 2142: 2137: 2132: 2126: 2120: 2114: 2109: 2104: 2099: 2094: 2089: 2084: 2079: 2074: 2068: 2066: 2058: 2057: 2055: 2054: 2049: 2044: 2039: 2034: 2029: 2024: 2018: 2016: 2010: 2009: 2007: 2006: 2000: 1994: 1986: 1980: 1974: 1968: 1960: 1954: 1948: 1942: 1937: 1931: 1925: 1919: 1913: 1907: 1901: 1895: 1889: 1883: 1877: 1871: 1865: 1859: 1813: 1807: 1801: 1795: 1789: 1783: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1764: 1758: 1752: 1746: 1740: 1734: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1713: 1707: 1701: 1695: 1689: 1683: 1677: 1671: 1665: 1659: 1653: 1647: 1641: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1622: 1616: 1609: 1607: 1592: 1591: 1588: 1587: 1585: 1584: 1576: 1567: 1565: 1558: 1557: 1555: 1554: 1546: 1538: 1530: 1522: 1514: 1506: 1498: 1490: 1482: 1474: 1466: 1458: 1450: 1441: 1439: 1432: 1431: 1429: 1428: 1420: 1412: 1404: 1396: 1388: 1379: 1377: 1370: 1369: 1367: 1366: 1358: 1349: 1347: 1340: 1339: 1337: 1336: 1328: 1320: 1312: 1304: 1296: 1288: 1280: 1272: 1264: 1256: 1248: 1239: 1237: 1230: 1229: 1227: 1226: 1218: 1210: 1202: 1194: 1186: 1178: 1169: 1167: 1157: 1156: 1148: 1140: 1132: 1124: 1116: 1108: 1099: 1097: 1089: 1088: 1083: 1081: 1080: 1073: 1066: 1058: 1049: 1048: 1045: 1044: 1042: 1041: 1033: 1029:Whitman v. ATA 1025: 1017: 1009: 1001: 992: 990: 986: 985: 982: 981: 979: 978: 970: 962: 954: 946: 938: 930: 922: 914: 906: 898: 890: 882: 873: 871: 867: 866: 864: 863: 855: 851:Norton v. SUWA 847: 843:Webster v. Doe 839: 831: 823: 814: 812: 805: 801: 800: 798: 797: 789: 781: 773: 765: 757: 749: 741: 733: 725: 717: 708: 706: 699: 693: 692: 690: 689: 682: 679:Justice Manual 674: 672: 668: 667: 665: 664: 659: 652: 645: 637: 635: 631: 630: 628: 627: 621: 615: 609: 602: 600: 594: 593: 591: 590: 585: 580: 575: 569: 567: 563: 562: 557: 555: 554: 547: 540: 532: 526: 525: 481: 480:External links 478: 475: 474: 450: 426: 400: 388:faegre drinker 371: 354: 353: 351: 348: 328: 325: 300: 297: 280: 277: 236: 233: 218: 217: 211: 210: 206: 205: 202: 198: 197: 194: 190: 189: 185: 184: 183: 182: 133: 130: 125: 119: 118: 114: 113: 108: 107: 103: 102: 98: 97: 93: 92: 87: 83: 82: 69: 65: 64: 59: 55: 54: 49: 48:Full case name 45: 44: 38: 37: 32: 24: 23: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2296: 2285: 2282: 2280: 2277: 2275: 2272: 2270: 2267: 2265: 2262: 2260: 2257: 2255: 2252: 2250: 2247: 2246: 2244: 2229: 2226: 2224: 2221: 2219: 2216: 2213: 2210: 2208: 2207: 2203: 2201: 2198: 2196: 2193: 2191: 2190:Right to know 2188: 2186: 2183: 2181: 2178: 2176: 2173: 2171: 2168: 2166: 2163: 2161: 2158: 2156: 2153: 2151: 2148: 2146: 2143: 2141: 2138: 2136: 2133: 2130: 2127: 2124: 2121: 2118: 2115: 2113: 2110: 2108: 2105: 2103: 2100: 2098: 2095: 2093: 2090: 2088: 2085: 2083: 2080: 2078: 2075: 2073: 2070: 2069: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2053: 2050: 2048: 2045: 2043: 2040: 2038: 2035: 2033: 2030: 2028: 2025: 2023: 2020: 2019: 2017: 2015: 2011: 2004: 2001: 1998: 1995: 1992: 1991: 1987: 1984: 1981: 1978: 1975: 1972: 1969: 1966: 1965: 1961: 1958: 1955: 1952: 1949: 1946: 1943: 1941: 1938: 1935: 1932: 1929: 1926: 1923: 1920: 1917: 1914: 1911: 1908: 1905: 1902: 1899: 1896: 1893: 1890: 1887: 1884: 1881: 1878: 1875: 1872: 1869: 1866: 1863: 1860: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1814: 1811: 1808: 1805: 1802: 1799: 1796: 1793: 1790: 1787: 1784: 1781: 1778: 1774: 1771: 1770: 1768: 1765: 1762: 1759: 1756: 1753: 1750: 1747: 1744: 1741: 1738: 1735: 1732: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1720: 1719: 1717: 1716:Clean Air Act 1714: 1711: 1708: 1705: 1702: 1699: 1696: 1693: 1690: 1687: 1684: 1681: 1678: 1675: 1672: 1669: 1666: 1663: 1660: 1657: 1654: 1651: 1648: 1645: 1642: 1639: 1636: 1632: 1629: 1628: 1626: 1623: 1620: 1617: 1614: 1611: 1610: 1608: 1599: 1593: 1582: 1581: 1577: 1574: 1573: 1569: 1568: 1566: 1563: 1559: 1552: 1551: 1547: 1544: 1543: 1539: 1536: 1535: 1531: 1528: 1527: 1523: 1520: 1519: 1515: 1512: 1511: 1507: 1504: 1503: 1499: 1496: 1495: 1491: 1488: 1487: 1483: 1480: 1479: 1475: 1472: 1471: 1467: 1464: 1463: 1459: 1456: 1455: 1451: 1448: 1447: 1443: 1442: 1440: 1437: 1433: 1426: 1425: 1421: 1418: 1417: 1413: 1410: 1409: 1405: 1402: 1401: 1397: 1394: 1393: 1389: 1386: 1385: 1381: 1380: 1378: 1375: 1371: 1364: 1363: 1359: 1356: 1355: 1351: 1350: 1348: 1345: 1341: 1334: 1333: 1329: 1326: 1325: 1321: 1318: 1317: 1313: 1310: 1309: 1305: 1302: 1301: 1297: 1294: 1293: 1289: 1286: 1285: 1281: 1278: 1277: 1273: 1270: 1269: 1265: 1262: 1261: 1257: 1254: 1253: 1249: 1246: 1245: 1241: 1240: 1238: 1235: 1231: 1224: 1223: 1219: 1216: 1215: 1211: 1208: 1207: 1203: 1200: 1199: 1195: 1192: 1191: 1187: 1184: 1183: 1179: 1176: 1175: 1171: 1170: 1168: 1165: 1161: 1154: 1153: 1149: 1146: 1145: 1141: 1138: 1137: 1133: 1130: 1129: 1125: 1122: 1121: 1117: 1114: 1113: 1109: 1106: 1105: 1101: 1100: 1098: 1094: 1093:Supreme Court 1090: 1086: 1079: 1074: 1072: 1067: 1065: 1060: 1059: 1056: 1039: 1038: 1034: 1031: 1030: 1026: 1023: 1022: 1021:Gade v. NSWMA 1018: 1015: 1014: 1010: 1007: 1006: 1005:CFTC v. Schor 1002: 999: 998: 997:INS v. Chadha 994: 993: 991: 989:Agency Action 987: 976: 975: 971: 968: 967: 963: 960: 959: 955: 952: 951: 947: 944: 943: 939: 936: 935: 931: 928: 927: 923: 920: 919: 915: 912: 911: 907: 904: 903: 899: 896: 895: 891: 888: 887: 883: 880: 879: 875: 874: 872: 868: 861: 860: 856: 853: 852: 848: 845: 844: 840: 837: 836: 832: 829: 828: 824: 821: 820: 816: 815: 813: 811:Reviewability 809: 806: 802: 795: 794: 790: 787: 786: 782: 779: 778: 774: 771: 770: 766: 763: 762: 758: 755: 754: 750: 747: 746: 742: 739: 738: 734: 731: 730: 726: 723: 722: 718: 715: 714: 710: 709: 707: 703: 700: 698: 694: 688: 687: 683: 681: 680: 676: 675: 673: 669: 663: 660: 658: 657: 653: 651: 650: 646: 644: 643: 639: 638: 636: 632: 625: 622: 619: 616: 613: 610: 607: 604: 603: 601: 599: 595: 589: 586: 584: 581: 579: 576: 574: 571: 570: 568: 564: 560: 553: 548: 546: 541: 539: 534: 533: 530: 521: 512: 503: 496: 492: 488: 484: 483: 479: 471: 470:Supreme Court 467: 463: 457: 455: 451: 440: 436: 430: 427: 415: 411: 404: 401: 389: 385: 378: 376: 372: 368: 362: 360: 356: 349: 347: 345: 341: 337: 333: 326: 324: 321: 317: 313: 309: 305: 298: 296: 294: 290: 286: 279:Supreme Court 278: 276: 274: 270: 266: 262: 258: 254: 250: 246: 245:air pollution 242: 241:Clean Air Act 234: 232: 230: 229:Clean Air Act 226: 225: 216: 215:Clean Air Act 212: 207: 203: 199: 195: 191: 188:Case opinions 186: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 161: 157: 153: 149: 145: 141: 137: 134: 131: 129: 126: 124:Chief Justice 123: 122: 120: 115: 109: 104: 99: 94: 91: 90:Oral argument 88: 84: 80: 79: 74: 70: 66: 63: 60: 56: 53: 50: 46: 39: 35: 25: 20: 2204: 2077:Citizen suit 2065:and concepts 1988: 1962: 1728: 1578: 1570: 1548: 1540: 1532: 1524: 1516: 1508: 1500: 1492: 1484: 1476: 1468: 1460: 1452: 1444: 1422: 1414: 1406: 1398: 1390: 1382: 1360: 1352: 1330: 1322: 1314: 1306: 1298: 1290: 1282: 1274: 1266: 1258: 1250: 1242: 1220: 1212: 1204: 1196: 1188: 1180: 1172: 1150: 1142: 1134: 1126: 1118: 1110: 1102: 1035: 1027: 1019: 1011: 1003: 995: 972: 964: 956: 948: 940: 932: 924: 916: 910:BGLC v. NRDC 908: 900: 892: 884: 876: 857: 849: 841: 833: 825: 817: 791: 783: 775: 767: 759: 751: 743: 735: 727: 719: 711: 684: 677: 654: 647: 640: 573:Adjudication 486: 469: 465: 461: 442:. Retrieved 438: 429: 417:. Retrieved 413: 403: 391:. Retrieved 387: 366: 330: 312:Samuel Alito 308:John Roberts 304:Neil Gorsuch 302: 282: 238: 223: 222: 221: 209:Laws applied 175: 163: 160:Neil Gorsuch 151: 144:Samuel Alito 139: 128:John Roberts 76: 51: 2062:Regulations 942:FDA v. BWTC 705:Due Process 634:Regulations 487:Ohio v. EPA 439:Ballotpedia 414:Cornell Law 340:Elena Kagan 156:Elena Kagan 2243:Categories 1631:Refuse Act 578:Rulemaking 444:2024-06-29 350:References 253:bronchitis 235:Background 58:Docket no. 1644:Weeks Act 1638:Lacey Act 1606:decisions 1602:treaties, 1096:decisions 68:Citations 2129:LDV Rule 870:Standard 566:Concepts 485:Text of 419:June 29, 393:June 29, 193:Majority 86:Argument 1769:(1972) 1627:(1899) 327:Dissent 201:Dissent 106:Holding 2214:(2010) 2131:(2010) 2125:(2022) 2119:(2007) 2005:(2022) 1999:(2022) 1985:(2021) 1979:(2018) 1973:(2016) 1959:(2007) 1953:(2005) 1947:(1996) 1936:(1990) 1930:(1990) 1924:(1990) 1918:(1986) 1912:(1986) 1906:(1980) 1900:(1978) 1894:(1977) 1888:(1976) 1882:(1976) 1876:(1976) 1870:(1975) 1864:(1975) 1806:(1973) 1800:(1973) 1794:(1972) 1788:(1972) 1782:(1972) 1757:(1970) 1751:(1970) 1745:(1969) 1739:(1965) 1712:(1961) 1706:(1956) 1700:(1955) 1694:(1954) 1688:(1934) 1682:(1928) 1676:(1924) 1670:(1924) 1664:(1918) 1658:(1913) 1652:(1911) 1646:(1911) 1640:(1900) 1621:(1897) 1615:(1872) 1583:(2021) 1575:(1998) 1562:CERCLA 1553:(2023) 1545:(2020) 1537:(2018) 1529:(2016) 1521:(2013) 1513:(2012) 1505:(2009) 1497:(2009) 1489:(2007) 1481:(2006) 1473:(2006) 1465:(2004) 1457:(2001) 1449:(1985) 1427:(2021) 1419:(2018) 1411:(2007) 1403:(1995) 1395:(1992) 1387:(1978) 1365:(2012) 1357:(1978) 1335:(2022) 1327:(2021) 1319:(2015) 1311:(2014) 1303:(2011) 1295:(2007) 1287:(2007) 1279:(2004) 1271:(2004) 1263:(2001) 1255:(1984) 1247:(1975) 1225:(2010) 1217:(2008) 1209:(2004) 1201:(2004) 1193:(1983) 1185:(1983) 1177:(1973) 1155:(2021) 1147:(2000) 1139:(1990) 1131:(1979) 1123:(1978) 1115:(1972) 1107:(1920) 1040:(2005) 1032:(2001) 1024:(1992) 1016:(1988) 1008:(1986) 1000:(1983) 977:(2024) 969:(2022) 961:(2019) 953:(2001) 945:(2000) 937:(2000) 929:(1997) 921:(1984) 913:(1983) 905:(1983) 897:(1951) 889:(1944) 881:(1944) 862:(2024) 854:(2004) 846:(1988) 838:(1985) 830:(1971) 822:(1967) 796:(1982) 788:(1979) 780:(1978) 772:(1976) 764:(1973) 756:(1972) 748:(1971) 740:(1970) 732:(1915) 724:(1908) 716:(1890) 626:(1980) 620:(1976) 614:(1966) 608:(1946) 583:Notice 523:  517:  514:  508:  505:  502:Justia 499:  342:, and 318:, and 289:stayed 249:asthma 178: 176:· 174:  166: 164:· 162:  154: 152:· 150:  142: 140:· 138:  112:sought 62:23A349 1595:Major 1564:cases 1438:cases 1376:cases 1346:cases 1236:cases 1166:cases 493: 367:Oyez, 1856:2007 1852:2000 1848:1999 1844:1996 1840:1992 1836:1990 1832:1988 1828:1986 1824:1976 1820:1974 1344:RCRA 1164:NEPA 495:U.S. 421:2024 395:2024 78:more 75:__ ( 73:U.S. 71:603 1436:CWA 1374:ESA 1234:CAA 491:603 251:or 2245:: 1854:, 1850:, 1846:, 1842:, 1838:, 1834:, 1830:, 1826:, 1822:, 489:, 464:. 453:^ 437:. 412:. 386:. 374:^ 358:^ 338:, 314:, 310:, 295:. 231:. 1818:( 1600:, 1077:e 1070:t 1063:v 551:e 544:t 537:v 447:. 423:. 397:. 81:)

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
23A349
U.S.
more
Oral argument
John Roberts
Clarence Thomas
Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch
Brett Kavanaugh
Amy Coney Barrett
Ketanji Brown Jackson
Clean Air Act
Clean Air Act
Clean Air Act
air pollution
asthma
bronchitis
Environmental Protection Agency
ozone pollution
State Implementation Plans
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
emergency appeal
electrical grid
stayed
writ of certiorari
Neil Gorsuch
John Roberts

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑