Knowledge

Ohio v. Robinette

Source 📝

101: 24: 499: 439:
consent to a search. For the same reason, the Court reasoned it would be "unrealistic to require police officers to always inform detainees that they are free to go before a consent to search may be deemed voluntary." Rather, voluntariness is a fact to be determined from all the circumstances surrounding the search.
417:, writing for the majority, stated that "The touchstone of the Fourth Amendment is reasonableness," and reasonableness is measured by examining the totality of the circumstances. This kind of fact-specific inquiry does not accommodate bright-line rules, as the Court has repeatedly held. In fact, in 465:
Robinette left. Stevens argued that a reasonable person, when faced with such a question from a police officer during a traffic stop, would not feel free to leave and not feel free to refuse to answer. Accordingly, the officer had continued to detain Robinette beyond the end of the traffic stop.
448:
concurred in the judgment of the Court. Ginsburg emphasized that the Court's holding only construed the Fourth Amendment, and that in light of the particular circumstances present in Ohio—where stops similar to Robinette's were frequently used as a pretext to search for drugs—the Ohio
438:
the Court refused to adopt a rule that a search predicated on a suspect's consent is unreasonable unless the suspect knew he had the right to refuse to consent to the search. The Court reasoned it would be impractical to require the police to explain to a suspect in any detail his right to refuse
466:
These conclusions of the Ohio Supreme Court were derived entirely from federal law, and thus did not impose a new obligation on other states in the guise of interpreting federal law. For this reason, Justice Stevens noted he would have affirmed the judgment of the Ohio Supreme Court.
402:
affirmed, ruling that the police must end a traffic stop by informing a motorist that they are free to leave before attempting to engage the motorist in a consensual interrogation or search their car. The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review the case.
367:, Robert Robinette was stopped for speeding. After verifying that Robinette had no prior violations, the officer asked Robinette to step out of his car before issuing him a verbal warning. The officer handed over Robinette's 603: 442: 394:
Before trial, Robinette moved to suppress the evidence seized from his car, but the trial court denied that request. Robinette then pleaded no contest to the charge. On appeal, the
573: 514: 475: 424: 183: 142: 485: 340: 322: 201: 588: 411: 53: 449:
Supreme Court was free to adopt the first-tell-then-ask rule it articulated as part of Ohio law, without imposing that requirement on the rest of the states.
379:
in his car. Robinette said he did not. The officer asked Robinette if he could search the car, and Robinette agreed. The officer found a small amount of
593: 480: 598: 336: 105: 75: 347:
to inform a motorist at the end of a traffic stop that they are free to go before seeking permission to search the motorist's
395: 384: 434: (1973), the Court had rejected a rule similar to the one adopted by the Ohio Supreme Court in this case. In 461:
concluded that the traffic stop was unlawful. The officer asked Robinette if he could ask him one more question
419: 36: 46: 40: 32: 552: 243: 57: 518: 428: 187: 134: 388: 503: 445: 368: 271: 399: 175: 458: 414: 235: 227: 160:
739; 96 Cal. Daily Op. Service 8278; 96 Daily Journal DAR 13761; 10 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 200
534: 267: 255: 398:
reversed the conviction, ruling that the search resulted from an illegal detention. The
525: 212:
that they are "free to go" before asking questions unrelated to the purpose of the stop.
431: 344: 279: 247: 543: 582: 360: 364: 259: 209: 137: 157: 569: 498: 153: 380: 149: 561: 205: 376: 296:
Rehnquist, joined by O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Breyer
179: 372: 100: 348: 17: 604:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
574:
National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws
476:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 519
486:
Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume
316: 308: 300: 292: 287: 216: 194: 170: 165: 129: 119: 112: 93: 124:State of Ohio, Petitioner v. Robert D. Robinette 45:but its sources remain unclear because it lacks 387:. Robinette was arrested for possession of a 8: 90: 481:List of United States Supreme Court cases 76:Learn how and when to remove this message 204:does not require the police to inform a 589:United States Fourth Amendment case law 339:case in which the Court held that the 182:695 (Ohio 1995); certiorari granted, 88:1996 United States Supreme Court case 7: 371:, and then asked him if he had any 106:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 594:United States Supreme Court cases 521:33 (1996) is available from: 497: 99: 22: 599:1996 in United States case law 359:While driving on a stretch of 1: 396:Ohio District Court of Appeal 335:, 519 U.S. 33 (1996), was a 156:6971; 65 U.S.L.W. 4013; 148 337:United States Supreme Court 174:Conviction reversed by the 620: 562:Oyez (oral argument audio) 420:Schneckloth v. Bustamonte 321: 221: 199: 115:Decided November 18, 1996 98: 31:This article includes a 60:more precise citations. 113:Argued October 8, 1996 323:U.S. Const. amend. IV 389:controlled substance 148:117 S. Ct. 417; 136 553:Library of Congress 446:Ruth Bader Ginsburg 272:Ruth Bader Ginsburg 244:Sandra Day O'Connor 453:Dissenting opinion 400:Ohio Supreme Court 232:Associate Justices 176:Ohio Supreme Court 33:list of references 511:Ohio v. Robinette 504:Ohio v. Robinette 502:Works related to 459:John Paul Stevens 415:William Rehnquist 343:does not require 332:Ohio v. Robinette 328: 327: 228:William Rehnquist 94:Ohio v. Robinette 86: 85: 78: 611: 566: 560: 557: 551: 548: 542: 539: 533: 530: 524: 501: 407:Majority opinion 383:and a tablet of 369:driver's license 341:Fourth Amendment 217:Court membership 202:Fourth Amendment 190:1157 (1996). 103: 102: 91: 81: 74: 70: 67: 61: 56:this article by 47:inline citations 26: 25: 18: 619: 618: 614: 613: 612: 610: 609: 608: 579: 578: 564: 558: 555: 549: 546: 540: 537: 531: 528: 522: 494: 472: 455: 409: 357: 345:police officers 270: 268:Clarence Thomas 258: 256:Anthony Kennedy 246: 236:John P. Stevens 161: 114: 108: 89: 82: 71: 65: 62: 51: 37:related reading 27: 23: 12: 11: 5: 617: 615: 607: 606: 601: 596: 591: 581: 580: 577: 576: 567: 507: 493: 492:External links 490: 489: 488: 483: 478: 471: 468: 454: 451: 408: 405: 356: 353: 326: 325: 319: 318: 314: 313: 310: 306: 305: 302: 298: 297: 294: 290: 289: 285: 284: 283: 282: 280:Stephen Breyer 248:Antonin Scalia 233: 230: 225: 219: 218: 214: 213: 197: 196: 192: 191: 172: 168: 167: 163: 162: 147: 131: 127: 126: 121: 120:Full case name 117: 116: 110: 109: 104: 96: 95: 87: 84: 83: 41:external links 30: 28: 21: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 616: 605: 602: 600: 597: 595: 592: 590: 587: 586: 584: 575: 571: 570:Press release 568: 563: 554: 545: 536: 527: 520: 516: 512: 508: 506:at Wikisource 505: 500: 496: 495: 491: 487: 484: 482: 479: 477: 474: 473: 469: 467: 464: 460: 452: 450: 447: 444: 440: 437: 433: 430: 426: 422: 421: 416: 413: 412:Chief Justice 406: 404: 401: 397: 392: 390: 386: 382: 378: 374: 370: 366: 362: 361:Interstate 70 354: 352: 350: 346: 342: 338: 334: 333: 324: 320: 315: 311: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 288:Case opinions 286: 281: 277: 273: 269: 265: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 237: 234: 231: 229: 226: 224:Chief Justice 223: 222: 220: 215: 211: 207: 203: 198: 193: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 169: 164: 159: 155: 151: 145: 144: 139: 136: 132: 128: 125: 122: 118: 111: 107: 97: 92: 80: 77: 69: 59: 55: 49: 48: 42: 38: 34: 29: 20: 19: 16: 510: 462: 456: 441: 435: 418: 410: 393: 365:Dayton, Ohio 358: 331: 330: 329: 317:Laws applied 275: 263: 260:David Souter 251: 239: 210:traffic stop 166:Case history 141: 123: 72: 63: 52:Please help 44: 15: 436:Schneckloth 301:Concurrence 158:A.L.R. Fed. 58:introducing 583:Categories 355:Background 154:U.S. LEXIS 152:347; 1996 381:marijuana 363:north of 208:during a 150:L. Ed. 2d 130:Citations 509:Text of 470:See also 457:Justice 304:Ginsburg 293:Majority 206:motorist 66:May 2024 535:Findlaw 526:Cornell 443:Justice 385:ecstasy 377:weapons 312:Stevens 309:Dissent 195:Holding 54:improve 565:  559:  556:  550:  547:  544:Justia 541:  538:  532:  529:  523:  463:before 278: 276:· 274:  266: 264:· 262:  254: 252:· 250:  242: 240:· 238:  180:N.E.2d 178:, 653 572:from 517: 427: 373:drugs 186: 171:Prior 39:, or 519:U.S. 429:U.S. 200:The 188:U.S. 143:more 135:U.S. 133:519 515:519 432:218 425:412 375:or 349:car 184:516 585:: 513:, 423:, 391:. 351:. 138:33 43:, 35:, 146:) 140:( 79:) 73:( 68:) 64:( 50:.

Index

list of references
related reading
external links
inline citations
improve
introducing
Learn how and when to remove this message
Supreme Court of the United States
U.S.
33
more
L. Ed. 2d
U.S. LEXIS
A.L.R. Fed.
Ohio Supreme Court
N.E.2d
516
U.S.
Fourth Amendment
motorist
traffic stop
William Rehnquist
John P. Stevens
Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy
David Souter
Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.