29:
238:
244:
303:
194:
McIntyre J, writing for a unanimous Court, held
Simpons-Sears had discriminated against O'Malley. Despite the reasonable basis for the requirement, the company had not tried to make any changes to the work schedule to accommodate O'Malley's religious requirements.
179:. As part of her religion, she was forbidden from working from sundown on Friday to sundown on Saturday. There were no full-time shifts available that did not require work on Friday and Saturday and so the company terminated her employment.
182:
Simpsons-Sears argued that by requiring all its employees to work
Fridays and Saturdays, it was not intentionally trying to discriminate against her, but it was a neutral requirement it imposed on all employees.
389:
344:
204:
186:
The issue before the
Supreme Court was whether the requirement for all employees to work on Friday and Saturday was discriminatory against her religion.
287:
379:
384:
337:
414:
394:
399:
404:
330:
280:
310:
172:
409:
273:
109:
217:
156:
34:
225:
361:
28:
221:
129:
113:
237:
314:
257:
160:
125:
54:
Ontario Human Rights
Commission and Theresa O'Malley (Vincent) v Simpsons‑Sears Limited
373:
121:
117:
105:
94:
60:
253:
176:
101:
302:
318:
261:
152:
Ontario (Human Rights
Commission) v Simpsons-Sears Ltd
22:
Ontario (Human Rights
Commission) v Simpsons-Sears Ltd
159:, which first acknowledged the existence of indirect
140:
135:
85:
77:
69:
59:
49:
42:
21:
163:through conduct that creates prejudicial effect.
205:Central Okanagan School District No 23 v Renaud
338:
281:
8:
390:History of the Seventh-day Adventist Church
345:
331:
288:
274:
155:, 2 SCR 536 is a leading decision by the
354:
18:
7:
299:
297:
233:
231:
362:SCC Case Information - Docket 17328
14:
175:who was employed by the retailer
301:
242:
236:
27:
380:Canadian civil rights case law
1:
385:Supreme Court of Canada cases
317:. You can help Knowledge by
260:. You can help Knowledge by
16:Supreme Court of Canada case
415:Seventh-day Adventist stubs
45:Judgment: December 17, 1985
431:
395:Labour relations in Canada
296:
230:
43:Hearing: January 29, 1985
400:1985 in Canadian case law
90:
26:
405:Religious discrimination
364:Supreme Court of Canada
218:Supreme Court of Canada
171:Theresa O'Malley was a
157:Supreme Court of Canada
35:Supreme Court of Canada
313:-related article is a
311:Seventh-day Adventist
173:Seventh-day Adventist
141:Unanimous reasons by
252:This article about
81:OHRC appeal allowed
410:Canadian law stubs
326:
325:
269:
268:
148:
147:
422:
365:
359:
347:
340:
333:
305:
298:
290:
283:
276:
248:
247:
246:
245:
240:
232:
130:GĂ©rard La Forest
114:Julien Chouinard
110:William McIntyre
99:Puisne Justices:
86:Court membership
31:
19:
430:
429:
425:
424:
423:
421:
420:
419:
370:
369:
368:
360:
356:
352:
351:
295:
294:
243:
241:
235:
213:
201:
192:
169:
97:
44:
38:
17:
12:
11:
5:
428:
426:
418:
417:
412:
407:
402:
397:
392:
387:
382:
372:
371:
367:
366:
353:
350:
349:
342:
335:
327:
324:
323:
306:
293:
292:
285:
278:
270:
267:
266:
249:
229:
228:
212:
211:External links
209:
208:
207:
200:
197:
191:
188:
177:Simpsons-Sears
168:
165:
161:discrimination
146:
145:
142:
138:
137:
133:
132:
126:Gerald Le Dain
92:Chief Justice:
88:
87:
83:
82:
79:
75:
74:
71:
67:
66:
63:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
32:
24:
23:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
427:
416:
413:
411:
408:
406:
403:
401:
398:
396:
393:
391:
388:
386:
383:
381:
378:
377:
375:
363:
358:
355:
348:
343:
341:
336:
334:
329:
328:
322:
320:
316:
312:
307:
304:
300:
291:
286:
284:
279:
277:
272:
271:
265:
263:
259:
255:
250:
239:
234:
227:
223:
219:
216:Full text of
215:
214:
210:
206:
203:
202:
198:
196:
189:
187:
184:
180:
178:
174:
166:
164:
162:
158:
154:
153:
143:
139:
136:Reasons given
134:
131:
127:
123:
122:Bertha Wilson
119:
118:Antonio Lamer
115:
111:
107:
106:Willard Estey
103:
100:
96:
95:Brian Dickson
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
36:
30:
25:
20:
357:
319:expanding it
308:
262:expanding it
254:Canadian law
251:
220:decision at
193:
185:
181:
170:
151:
150:
149:
98:
91:
53:
33:
374:Categories
224: and
167:Background
144:McIntyre J
102:Jean Beetz
70:Docket No.
65:2 SCR 536
61:Citations
199:See also
190:Decision
226:CanLII
78:Ruling
73:17328
309:This
256:is a
222:LexUM
315:stub
258:stub
376::
128:,
124:,
120:,
116:,
112:,
108:,
104:,
346:e
339:t
332:v
321:.
289:e
282:t
275:v
264:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
