36:
900:, the parties to an otherwise valid oral contract for construction services disagreed as to whether they had entered a single oral contract for work at three sites, or three separate contracts, one for each work site. Without a written agreement, the court had to examine other evidence to attempt to discern the intent of the parties, ultimately concluding that the parties were operating under a single contract.
105:
825:, the terms of which have been agreed by spoken communication. This is in contrast to a written contract, where the contract is a written document. There may be written, or other physical evidence, of an oral contract – for example where the parties write down what they have agreed – but the contract itself is not a written one.
366:
371:
874:
Provided that an oral contract satisfies any requirements imposed by law, such a requirement that contracts for a specific type of transaction be in writing, it is legally enforceable.
828:
In general, oral contracts are just as valid as written ones, but some jurisdictions either require a contract to be in writing in certain circumstances (for example where
585:
832:
is being conveyed), or that a contract be evidenced in writing (although the contract itself may be oral). An example of the latter is the requirement that a contract of
634:
46:
759:
326:
893:
with the oral contract and, after prevailing in court, was awarded $ 11.1 billion in damages, later reduced to $ 9.1 billion plus interest and penalties.
744:
3 Historically restricted in common law jurisdictions but generally accepted elsewhere; availability varies between contemporary common law jurisdictions
804:
80:
390:
354:
383:
843:
Similarly, the limitation period prescribed for an action may be shorter for an oral contract than it is for a written one.
649:
239:
1002:
134:
62:
797:
748:
669:
395:
644:
603:
515:
451:
164:
773:
624:
433:
283:
349:
309:
234:
210:
192:
1034:
890:
790:
777:
766:
639:
629:
573:
197:
657:
494:
344:
223:
129:
124:
923:
413:
304:
169:
149:
889:
later made a higher offer, and the company was sold to Texaco. Pennzoil filed a lawsuit alleging
699:
662:
504:
476:
442:
335:
320:
314:
288:
58:
953:
McNeill, W.S. (1928). "Agreements to Reduce to
Writing Contracts within the Statute of Frauds".
928:
837:
556:
545:
266:
215:
206:
187:
144:
885:
in a handshake deal, a lay term for an oral contract, which was binding under New York law.
579:
466:
461:
423:
418:
261:
244:
582:(also implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing or duty to negotiate in good faith)
471:
201:
178:
990:
776:, and Canadian jurisprudence in both Québec and the common law provinces pertaining to
717:
608:
539:
524:
272:
119:
1028:
933:
829:
508:
256:
229:
159:
1003:"Oral construction contracts: RCS Contractors Ltd v. Conway, a costly affair indeed"
712:
707:
694:
485:
139:
104:
550:
456:
361:
278:
752:
735:
154:
17:
878:
833:
703:
378:
850:
is sometimes used as a synonym for oral contract. However, since the term
906:"A verbal contract is worth about as much as the paper it's written on."
882:
822:
533:
428:
251:
96:
499:
972:
Fu, Jacqueline (2005). "International
Franchise Contracts in Taiwan".
886:
689:
679:
29:
45:
deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a
902:
769:
both in Québec and in the country's common law provinces
54:
772:
7 Specific to civil law jurisdictions, the
American
586:Contract A and Contract B in Canadian contract law
866:is recommended when maximum clarity is desired.
836:be evidenced in writing, which is found in the
741:2 Specific to civil and mixed law jurisdictions
798:
43:The examples and perspective in this article
8:
778:contractual and pre-contractual negotiation
805:
791:
92:
81:Learn how and when to remove this message
945:
725:
677:
616:
595:
565:
523:
484:
441:
405:
334:
296:
177:
111:
95:
574:Duty of honest contractual performance
1009:. Law Business Research. 18 July 2017
762:of International Commercial Contracts
7:
974:International Journal of Franchising
751:and other civil codes based on the
25:
576:(or doctrine of abuse of rights)
391:Enforcement of foreign judgments
355:Hague Choice of Court Convention
103:
34:
384:Singapore Mediation Convention
1:
898:RCS Contractors Ltd v. Conway
758:5 Explicitly rejected by the
525:Quasi-contractual obligations
57:, discuss the issue on the
1051:
896:In a United Kingdom case,
396:Hague Judgments Convention
747:4 Specific to the German
452:Anticipatory repudiation
202:unequal bargaining power
774:Uniform Commercial Code
749:BĂĽrgerliches Gesetzbuch
434:Third-party beneficiary
406:Rights of third parties
284:Accord and satisfaction
877:For example, in 1984,
505:Liquidated, stipulated
350:Forum selection clause
235:Frustration of purpose
891:tortious interference
854:could also mean just
767:Canadian contract law
135:Abstraction principle
596:Related areas of law
495:Specific performance
345:Choice of law clause
310:Contract of adhesion
224:Culpa in contrahendo
130:Meeting of the minds
125:Offer and acceptance
63:create a new article
55:improve this article
955:Virginia Law Review
924:Parol evidence rule
760:UNIDROIT Principles
534:Promissory estoppel
414:Privity of contract
367:New York Convention
327:UNIDROIT Principles
170:Collateral contract
165:Implication-in-fact
150:Invitation to treat
580:Duty of good faith
477:Fundamental breach
443:Breach of contract
372:UNCITRAL Model Law
336:Dispute resolution
321:Contra proferentem
315:Integration clause
289:Exculpatory clause
991:Pennzoil V Texaco
929:Statute of frauds
915:
914:
911:— Samuel Goldwyn
838:Statute of Frauds
815:
814:
658:England and Wales
566:Duties of parties
557:Negotiorum gestio
546:Unjust enrichment
267:Statute of frauds
216:Unconscionability
188:Misrepresentation
145:Mirror image rule
91:
90:
83:
65:, as appropriate.
16:(Redirected from
1042:
1019:
1018:
1016:
1014:
999:
993:
988:
982:
981:
969:
963:
962:
950:
903:
807:
800:
793:
635:China (mainland)
604:Conflict of laws
467:Efficient breach
462:Exclusion clause
262:Illusory promise
245:Impracticability
107:
93:
86:
79:
75:
72:
66:
38:
37:
30:
21:
1050:
1049:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1012:
1010:
1001:
1000:
996:
989:
985:
971:
970:
966:
952:
951:
947:
942:
920:
872:
848:verbal contract
811:
782:
654:United Kingdom
617:By jurisdiction
87:
76:
70:
67:
52:
39:
35:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1048:
1046:
1038:
1037:
1027:
1026:
1021:
1020:
994:
983:
964:
944:
943:
941:
938:
937:
936:
931:
926:
919:
916:
913:
912:
908:
907:
871:
868:
813:
812:
810:
809:
802:
795:
787:
784:
783:
781:
780:
770:
765:6 Specific to
763:
756:
745:
742:
739:
734:1 Specific to
731:
728:
727:
723:
722:
721:
720:
715:
710:
697:
692:
684:
683:
675:
674:
673:
672:
667:
666:
665:
660:
652:
647:
642:
637:
632:
627:
619:
618:
614:
613:
612:
611:
609:Commercial law
606:
598:
597:
593:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
577:
568:
567:
563:
562:
561:
560:
553:
548:
543:
540:Quantum meruit
536:
528:
527:
521:
520:
519:
518:
513:
512:
511:
497:
489:
488:
482:
481:
480:
479:
474:
469:
464:
459:
454:
446:
445:
439:
438:
437:
436:
431:
426:
421:
416:
408:
407:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
388:
387:
386:
376:
375:
374:
369:
359:
358:
357:
347:
339:
338:
332:
331:
330:
329:
324:
317:
312:
307:
305:Parol evidence
299:
298:
297:Interpretation
294:
293:
292:
291:
286:
281:
276:
273:Non est factum
269:
264:
259:
254:
249:
248:
247:
242:
237:
227:
220:
219:
218:
204:
195:
190:
182:
181:
175:
174:
173:
172:
167:
162:
157:
152:
147:
142:
137:
132:
127:
122:
114:
113:
109:
108:
100:
99:
89:
88:
71:September 2016
49:of the subject
47:worldwide view
42:
40:
33:
26:
24:
18:Oral agreement
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1047:
1036:
1033:
1032:
1030:
1008:
1004:
998:
995:
992:
987:
984:
979:
975:
968:
965:
960:
956:
949:
946:
939:
935:
934:Arthur Corbin
932:
930:
927:
925:
922:
921:
917:
910:
909:
905:
904:
901:
899:
894:
892:
888:
884:
880:
875:
869:
867:
865:
864:oral contract
861:
857:
853:
849:
844:
841:
839:
835:
831:
830:real property
826:
824:
820:
819:oral contract
808:
803:
801:
796:
794:
789:
788:
786:
785:
779:
775:
771:
768:
764:
761:
757:
754:
750:
746:
743:
740:
738:jurisdictions
737:
733:
732:
730:
729:
724:
719:
716:
714:
711:
709:
705:
701:
698:
696:
693:
691:
688:
687:
686:
685:
681:
676:
671:
670:United States
668:
664:
661:
659:
656:
655:
653:
651:
648:
646:
643:
641:
638:
636:
633:
631:
628:
626:
623:
622:
621:
620:
615:
610:
607:
605:
602:
601:
600:
599:
594:
587:
584:
583:
581:
578:
575:
572:
571:
570:
569:
564:
559:
558:
554:
552:
549:
547:
544:
542:
541:
537:
535:
532:
531:
530:
529:
526:
522:
517:
514:
510:
509:penal damages
506:
503:
502:
501:
500:Money damages
498:
496:
493:
492:
491:
490:
487:
483:
478:
475:
473:
470:
468:
465:
463:
460:
458:
455:
453:
450:
449:
448:
447:
444:
440:
435:
432:
430:
427:
425:
422:
420:
417:
415:
412:
411:
410:
409:
404:
397:
394:
393:
392:
389:
385:
382:
381:
380:
377:
373:
370:
368:
365:
364:
363:
360:
356:
353:
352:
351:
348:
346:
343:
342:
341:
340:
337:
333:
328:
325:
323:
322:
318:
316:
313:
311:
308:
306:
303:
302:
301:
300:
295:
290:
287:
285:
282:
280:
279:Unclean hands
277:
275:
274:
270:
268:
265:
263:
260:
258:
255:
253:
250:
246:
243:
241:
240:Impossibility
238:
236:
233:
232:
231:
230:Force majeure
228:
226:
225:
221:
217:
214:
213:
212:
211:public policy
208:
205:
203:
199:
196:
194:
191:
189:
186:
185:
184:
183:
180:
176:
171:
168:
166:
163:
161:
160:Consideration
158:
156:
153:
151:
148:
146:
143:
141:
138:
136:
133:
131:
128:
126:
123:
121:
118:
117:
116:
115:
110:
106:
102:
101:
98:
94:
85:
82:
74:
64:
60:
56:
50:
48:
41:
32:
31:
27:Legal concept
19:
1035:Contract law
1011:. Retrieved
1006:
997:
986:
977:
973:
967:
958:
954:
948:
897:
895:
881:was sold to
876:
873:
863:
860:spoken words
859:
855:
851:
847:
845:
842:
827:
818:
816:
713:Criminal law
695:Property law
650:Saudi Arabia
555:
538:
319:
271:
222:
140:Posting rule
97:Contract law
77:
68:
44:
1013:19 February
870:Enforcement
862:, the term
858:, not only
856:using words
551:Restitution
362:Arbitration
940:References
753:pandectist
736:common law
516:Rescission
424:Delegation
419:Assignment
207:Illegality
155:Firm offer
879:Getty Oil
846:The term
834:guarantee
755:tradition
625:Australia
472:Deviation
379:Mediation
112:Formation
59:talk page
1029:Category
1007:Lexology
918:See also
883:Pennzoil
823:contract
718:Evidence
690:Tort law
663:Scotland
486:Remedies
429:Novation
252:Hardship
179:Defences
120:Capacity
53:You may
708:estates
640:Ireland
257:Set-off
198:Threats
193:Mistake
961:: 553.
887:Texaco
852:verbal
706:, and
704:trusts
678:Other
630:Canada
821:is a
726:Notes
700:Wills
682:areas
645:India
507:, or
457:Cover
61:, or
1015:2021
980:: 6.
209:and
200:and
817:An
680:law
1031::
1005:.
976:.
959:15
957:.
840:.
702:,
1017:.
978:3
806:e
799:t
792:v
84:)
78:(
73:)
69:(
51:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
