Knowledge

Chicago plan

Source 📝

80:. Its main provision was to require 100% reserves on deposits subject to check, so that "the creation and destruction of effective money through private lending operations would be impossible". The plan, in other words, envisaged to separate the issuing from the lending of money. This, according to its authors, would prevent the money supply from cyclically varying as bank loans were expanded or contracted. In addition, the payment system would become perfectly safe. No 625:"I am not convinced that eliminating the role of private banks in the supply of ‘broad’ money is a good idea, as there is no guarantee that governments would, on the whole, do a better job at providing financing for the real economy. Furthermore, if banks face such severe restrictions on their ability to lend, one can expect that private credit would quickly migrate to unregulated parts of the financial system, with unknown consequences." 664: 688: 676: 123:. Other proponents of 100% reserves, however, such as Currie and Fisher, would still have allowed commercial banks to make loans out of savings deposits, as long as these could not be made transferable by check. As Fisher put it in 1936, the banks would be free to lend money “provided we now no longer allow them to manufacture the money that they lend”. 249:. In the paper, the authors have updated the original Chicago plan proposal to fit into today's economy. They conclude that the advantages of such a system, according to the authors, are a more balanced economy without the booms and busts of the current system, the elimination of bank runs, and a drastic reduction of both public and 171:
Between March and November 1933, the Chicago economists received comments from a number of individuals on their proposal, and in November 1933, another memorandum was prepared. The memorandum was expanded to thirteen pages; there was a supplementary memorandum on "Long-time Objectives of Monetary
221:
The proposal was never published. A copy of the paper was apparently preserved in a college library. Copies of the paper, stamped on the bottom of the first and last pages, “LIBRARY – COLORADO STATE COLLEGE OF A. & M. A. – FORT COLLINS COLORADO” were circulated at the 5th Annual
218:, Wilford I. King, and Charles R. Whittlesey. It claimed that 235 economists from 157 universities and colleges had expressed approval of the draft with 40 more had "approved it with reservations" and "43 have expressed disapproval." 106:
Although the Chicago Plan is often likened to other 100% reserve plans (such as Fisher's), there were some important differences between them, for example regarding bank intermediation. The Chicago Plan would not only have subjected
130:
of the banking sector, which, in the context of the Great Depression, was considered by some as a real possibility. This concern was shared by Fisher: "In short: nationalize money, but do not nationalize banking”.
183:
institutionalized federal deposit insurance and the separation of commercial and investment banking. It successfully restored the public's confidence in the banking system and ended discussion of banking reform.
144:
A six-page memorandum on banking reform was given limited and confidential distribution to about forty individuals on 16 March 1933. The plan was supported by such notable economists as
642: 531: 514: 383: 310: 268:
when the paper was published), said she was not convinced "that eliminating the role of private banks in the supply of ‘broad’ money is a good idea".
646: 535: 518: 563: 175:
These memoranda generated much interest and discussion among lawmakers. However, the suggested reforms, such as the imposition of 100% reserves on
395:
Demeulemeester, S. (2018). The 100% Money Proposal and its Implications for Banking: The Currie–Fisher approach versus the Chicago Plan Approach,
203: 149: 61: 641:
Douglas, Paul H.; Hamilton, Earl J.; Fisher, Irving; King, Willford I.; Graham, Frank D.; Whittlesey, Charles R. (July 1939),
530:
Douglas, Paul H.; Hamilton, Earl J.; Fisher, Irving; King, Willford I.; Graham, Frank D.; Whittlesey, Charles R. (July 1939),
513:
Douglas, Paul H.; Hamilton, Earl J.; Fisher, Irving; King, Willford I.; Graham, Frank D.; Whittlesey, Charles R. (July 1939),
198:, this caused renewed discussion of the key elements of the Chicago plan, and in July 1939 a new proposal was drafted, titled 495: 680: 369:
Simons, H.C. et al. Banking and Currency Reform, Memorandum dated November 1933, reprinted in Samuels, W. (ed.), 1994,
265: 238: 223: 654: 708: 718: 713: 283:
Phillips, R.J. (1995), The Chicago Plan and New Deal Banking Reform, Armonk, NY, M.E. Sharpe, pp. 45, 63, 191
195: 211: 45: 626: 328:. Banking and Currency Reform, Memorandum dated November 1933, reprinted in Samuels, W. (ed.), 1994, 296:. Banking and Currency Reform, Memorandum dated November 1933, reprinted in Samuels, W. (ed.), 1994, 88: 49: 65: 601: 242: 180: 229:
The Chicago plan, and was submitted to the Government, but did not result in any new legislation.
435: 261: 108: 81: 17: 215: 172:
Management" (seven pages) and an appendix titled "Banking and Business Cycles" (six pages).
120: 116: 41: 226:
Monetary Reform Conference (2009) and the images were scanned for display on the internet.
161: 153: 145: 127: 92: 53: 37: 356: 246: 176: 165: 100: 57: 702: 207: 157: 96: 77: 91:
on checking deposits would be advocated by other economists in the 1930s, including
692: 668: 250: 69: 73: 549: 475: 202:. The draft paper was attributed on its cover page to six American economists: 588: 253:. The authors rely on economic theory and historical examples, and state that 627:
Answers by Christine Lagarde to the questionnaire by the European Parliament
254: 675: 99:
of Yale. A more recent variant of this reform idea is to be found in the "
119:, and would be replaced in their lending function by equity-financed 111:
to 100% reserves, but further eliminated fractional-reserve banking
477:
The 'Chicago Plan' and New Deal Banking Reform,Working Paper No. 76
237:
In August 2012, the proposal was given renewed attention after the
27:
Collection of narrow banking reforms proposed for the US in 1935
126:
An important motivation of the Chicago Plan was to prevent the
564:"IMF's epic plan to conjure away debt and dethrone bankers" 371:
Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology
330:
Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology
298:
Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology
373:, Archival Supplement 4, JAI Press Inc., 31–40 (pp. 34-35) 179:, were shelved and replaced by less drastic measures. The 397:
The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
332:, Archival Supplement 4, JAI Press Inc., 31–40 (p. 35) 257:, according to their calculations, would be very low. 652: 343:
The Supply and Control of Money in the United States
649:), archived from the original (PDF) on 26 July 2011 538:), archived from the original (PDF) on 26 July 2011 521:), archived from the original (PDF) on 26 July 2011 345:, New York, NY, Russell & Russell, pp. 151-156 503:, Ludwig von Mises Institute, pp. 731–735 300:, Archival Supplement 4, JAI Press Inc., 31–40 232: 84:as that of 1929-1933 could ever occur again. 8: 550:The Chicago Plan and New Deal Banking Reform 423:The Chicago Plan and New Deal Banking Reform 115:: banks could no longer make loans out of 386:. The University of Chicago Press, p. 25 659: 497:Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles 276: 602:"On Kumhof The Chicago Plan Revisited" 360:, 2nd ed., 1936, New York, NY: Adelphi 40:program suggested in the wake of the 7: 384:A Positive Program for Laissez Faire 312:A Positive Program for Laissez Faire 189:A Program for Monetary Reform (1939) 241:(IMF) published a working paper by 233:IMF's Chicago plan revisited (2012) 25: 474:Phillips, Ronnie J. (June 1992), 315:. The University of Chicago Press 686: 674: 662: 425:, Armonk, NY, M.E. Sharpe, p. 53 156:, as well as by Lloyd W. Mints, 483:, The Levy Economics Institute. 260:Asked about the paper in 2019, 589:Presentation by Michael Kumhof 494:Huerta de Soto, JesĂșs (2006), 436:100% Money and the Public Debt 1: 643:A Program for Monetary Reform 532:A Program for Monetary Reform 515:A Program for Monetary Reform 200:A Program for Monetary Reform 18:A Program for Monetary Reform 264:, (managing director of the 239:International Monetary Fund 224:American Monetary Institute 38:monetary and banking reform 735: 82:great monetary contraction 645:(original scanned PDF), ( 534:(original scanned PDF), ( 517:(original scanned PDF), ( 399:, vol. 25, no. 2, 357–87 421:Phillips, R.J. (1995), 382:Simons, Henry C. 1934. 309:Simons, Henry C. 1934. 194:As America entered the 168:, and Albert G. Hart. 681:Business and economics 196:Recession of 1937-1938 341:Currie, L.B. (1934), 48:economists including 46:University of Chicago 647:transcript text here 591:, 12. September 2012 536:transcript text here 519:transcript text here 464:(London 2017) p. 262 451:(London 2017) p. 388 434:Fisher, I., 2009, “ 412:(London 2017) p. 263 354:Fisher, I. (1935), 181:Banking Act of 1935 462:The End of Alchemy 449:The End of Alchemy 410:The End of Alchemy 408:Quoted in M King, 570:. 21 October 2012 262:Christine Lagarde 121:investment trusts 109:checking deposits 16:(Redirected from 726: 709:Great Depression 691: 690: 689: 679: 678: 667: 666: 665: 658: 630: 629:, September 2019 623: 617: 616: 614: 612: 598: 592: 586: 580: 579: 577: 575: 560: 554: 545: 539: 528: 522: 511: 505: 504: 502: 491: 485: 484: 482: 471: 465: 458: 452: 445: 439: 432: 426: 419: 413: 406: 400: 393: 387: 380: 374: 367: 361: 352: 346: 339: 333: 322: 316: 307: 301: 290: 284: 281: 216:Earl J. Hamilton 117:savings deposits 42:Great Depression 21: 734: 733: 729: 728: 727: 725: 724: 723: 719:Monetary reform 714:Monetary policy 699: 698: 697: 687: 685: 673: 663: 661: 653: 638: 633: 624: 620: 610: 608: 606:sovereign money 600: 599: 595: 587: 583: 573: 571: 562: 561: 557: 546: 542: 529: 525: 512: 508: 500: 493: 492: 488: 480: 473: 472: 468: 459: 455: 446: 442: 433: 429: 420: 416: 407: 403: 394: 390: 381: 377: 368: 364: 353: 349: 340: 336: 323: 319: 308: 304: 291: 287: 282: 278: 274: 235: 212:Frank D. Graham 204:Paul H. Douglas 192: 177:demand deposits 162:Garfield V. Cox 154:Henry C. Simons 150:Paul H. Douglas 146:Frank H. Knight 142: 137: 128:nationalization 95:of Harvard and 93:Lauchlin Currie 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 732: 730: 722: 721: 716: 711: 701: 700: 696: 695: 683: 671: 651: 650: 637: 634: 632: 631: 618: 593: 581: 555: 540: 523: 506: 486: 466: 453: 440: 427: 414: 401: 388: 375: 362: 347: 334: 317: 302: 285: 275: 273: 270: 247:Michael Kumhof 234: 231: 191: 186: 166:Aaron Director 141: 140:Origins (1933) 138: 136: 133: 101:narrow banking 66:Albert G. Hart 58:Aaron Director 44:by a group of 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 731: 720: 717: 715: 712: 710: 707: 706: 704: 694: 684: 682: 677: 672: 670: 660: 656: 648: 644: 640: 639: 635: 628: 622: 619: 607: 603: 597: 594: 590: 585: 582: 569: 568:The Telegraph 565: 559: 556: 553:(1992) p. 158 552: 551: 544: 541: 537: 533: 527: 524: 520: 516: 510: 507: 499: 498: 490: 487: 479: 478: 470: 467: 463: 457: 454: 450: 444: 441: 437: 431: 428: 424: 418: 415: 411: 405: 402: 398: 392: 389: 385: 379: 376: 372: 366: 363: 359: 358: 351: 348: 344: 338: 335: 331: 327: 324:Simons, H.C. 321: 318: 314: 313: 306: 303: 299: 295: 292:Simons, H.C. 289: 286: 280: 277: 271: 269: 267: 263: 258: 256: 252: 248: 244: 243:Jaromir Benes 240: 230: 227: 225: 219: 217: 213: 209: 208:Irving Fisher 205: 201: 197: 190: 187: 185: 182: 178: 173: 169: 167: 163: 159: 158:Henry Schultz 155: 151: 147: 139: 134: 132: 129: 124: 122: 118: 114: 110: 104: 102: 98: 97:Irving Fisher 94: 90: 89:100% reserves 87:This idea of 85: 83: 79: 78:Henry Schultz 75: 71: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 47: 43: 39: 35: 30: 19: 636:Bibliography 621: 609:. Retrieved 605: 596: 584: 572:. Retrieved 567: 558: 548: 547:R Phillips, 543: 526: 509: 496: 489: 476: 469: 461: 456: 448: 443: 430: 422: 417: 409: 404: 396: 391: 378: 370: 365: 355: 350: 342: 337: 329: 325: 320: 311: 305: 297: 293: 288: 279: 259: 251:private debt 236: 228: 220: 199: 193: 188: 174: 170: 143: 125: 112: 105: 103:" proposal. 86: 70:Frank Knight 62:Paul Douglas 54:Garfield Cox 50:Henry Simons 34:Chicago plan 33: 31: 29: 611:30 November 574:30 November 74:Lloyd Mints 703:Categories 357:100% Money 272:References 255:inflation 460:M King, 447:M King, 438:”, p. 15 655:Portals 135:History 152:, and 113:per se 36:was a 693:Money 669:Banks 501:(PDF) 481:(PDF) 326:et al 294:et al 613:2020 576:2020 245:and 76:and 32:The 266:IMF 705:: 604:. 566:. 214:, 210:, 206:, 164:, 160:, 148:, 72:, 68:, 64:, 60:, 56:, 52:, 657:: 615:. 578:. 20:)

Index

A Program for Monetary Reform
monetary and banking reform
Great Depression
University of Chicago
Henry Simons
Garfield Cox
Aaron Director
Paul Douglas
Albert G. Hart
Frank Knight
Lloyd Mints
Henry Schultz
great monetary contraction
100% reserves
Lauchlin Currie
Irving Fisher
narrow banking
checking deposits
savings deposits
investment trusts
nationalization
Frank H. Knight
Paul H. Douglas
Henry C. Simons
Henry Schultz
Garfield V. Cox
Aaron Director
demand deposits
Banking Act of 1935
Recession of 1937-1938

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑