Knowledge (XXG)

Access to public information in Montenegro

Source 📝

115:(BIRN), problems in realizing the right of access to public information arise in particular when journalists and NGOs seek information about the privatization process or seek information that could potentially reveal cases of corruption or illegal activity. According to the NGO MANS, the respect of the law on access to public information is particularly problematic when it comes to make public information concerning enterprises where the State owns the majority of shares. 44:, access to information is a right guaranteed by the Constitution and regulated under the law. Montenegro first adopted the Law on Free Access to Information in 2005; in 2013 a new law entered into force, providing a better standard of protection for freedom of information than the previous legal act. However, despite some positive developments achieved with the adoption of the new Law, Montenegro still has problems with its implementation. 105:
avoid their disclosure. Indeed, according to the NGO MANS, the law includes a series of unnecessary reasons for exceptions for limiting disclosure. The formulation of the exceptions enshrined in the law seems to be too vague and too general, thus giving room for public institutions to interpret it in a way that restricts access to information.
100:
The majority of FOI requests, around 70%, are filed by NGOs, among which stands the NGO MANS. This data shows the low awareness and knowledge by the general public of the right of access to information and its legal provisions. In the majority of cases applicants are get the required information with
64:
establishes a precise procedure for obtaining public information. The law entitles any natural or legal person the right to access information held in any form by state and local authorities, public companies and other entities which exercise public functions. Public authorities have 15 working days
88:
In the last years the proportion of requests refused by public authorities in Montenegro improved from 24% in 2014 to 18% in 2015. Also, the 2016 budget of the Agency for the Protection of Personal Data and Access to Information was increased by 50%. The limited capacity and resources of the Agency
36:
held by public bodies also known as "right to know". Access to public information is considered of fundamental importance for the effective functioning of democratic systems, as it enhances governments' and public officials' accountability, boosting people participation and allowing their informed
104:
Another issue of concern is that court decisions on cases concerning access to information are not effectively enforced. The report of the EC also points out that in some cases public authorities in Montenegro seem to abuse the possibility of declaring requested documents confidential in order to
92:
In 2015, out of a total of 4.434 requests for access to information, the information requested was not provided in 805 cases. The Agency for Personal Data Protection and Free Access to Information received a total of 1.431 complaints in 2015. The majority of cases received by the Agency concerned
68:
The new law introduced a new supervisory body, called Agency for the Protection of Personal Data and Free Access to Information which works on the appeal process of freedom of information requests. Another positive development in the 2013 law is the introduction of fines to be imposed upon public
37:
participation into public life. The fundamental premise of the right of access to public information is that the information held by governmental institutions is in principle public and may be concealed only on the basis of legitimate reasons which should be detailed in the law.
59:
The Constitution of Montenegro states, in Article 51, that everyone shall have the right of access to public information held by state authorities and organisations exercising public functions. Furthermore, the
200:"Freedom of information in Montenegro. Analysis of the Legal Framework, Practice and Implementation of ECHR Case Law and other International Standards with Recommendations for Improvement" 495: 47:
Recently, Montenegro started the process of reforming the current law: a draft proposal was formulated by the Culture of Ministry in 2016 following some pressure from the
85:, the experience of journalists and NGOs in the country shows that, despite FOI legal provisions, in practice it is difficult to get information of public importance. 627: 289: 142: 672: 500: 697: 647: 607: 505: 470: 460: 725: 692: 662: 550: 510: 446: 437: 137: 127: 17: 250: 565: 81:
Progress Report on Montenegro, the law on Access to public information lack effective monitoring and supervision. According to the newspaper
347: 171: 702: 515: 763: 540: 778: 730: 622: 735: 587: 740: 687: 657: 597: 577: 480: 809: 768: 592: 788: 773: 720: 667: 642: 560: 555: 545: 530: 525: 520: 490: 485: 475: 465: 783: 682: 652: 637: 632: 612: 582: 535: 758: 677: 602: 572: 101:
large delays, beyond the time frame established by the law, and often after having filed a complaint to the Ombudsbam.
199: 819: 430: 118:
The EC Progress Report recommends to enhance the implementation of the law especially in corruption-prone cases.
94: 132: 27: 423: 392: 308: 218: 33: 152: 147: 78: 373: 814: 405: 321: 231: 415: 112: 48: 803: 108:
Another reason of concern is the high percentage of requests that remain unanswered.
69:
bodies which fail to fulfill with their duties with regard to access to information.
41: 89:
was an issue of concern for some NGOs advocating for access to information.
82: 354:(in Italian). Osservatorio Balcani Caucasto Transeuropa / Vijesti 419: 65:
for deciding on the disclosure of a required information.
374:"Montenegro 2015 Human Rights Report. Executive Summary" 348:"Montenegro: i silenzi della pubblica amministrazione" 51:
to align Montenegrin legislation with EU standards.
749: 711: 453: 97:: in these cases the request remained unanswered. 251:"Montenegro Plan to Open Public Records Doubted" 431: 205:. MANS. Network for Affirmation of NGO Sector 153:Transparency of media ownership in Montenegro 8: 438: 424: 416: 143:Transparency of media ownership in Europe 73:Access to public information in practice 447:Access to public information in Europe 164: 401: 390: 341: 339: 337: 335: 333: 331: 317: 306: 245: 243: 241: 227: 216: 194: 192: 190: 188: 186: 184: 182: 138:Freedom of information laws by country 128:Access to public information in Europe 113:Balkan Investigative Reporting Network 62:2013 Law on Free Access to Information 18:Access to public information in Europe 7: 346:Čađenović, Ivan (10 February 2017). 284: 282: 280: 278: 276: 274: 272: 14: 172:Freedom of Information, UNESCO. 1: 257:. BalkanInsight. 1 April 2016 23:Access to public information 379:. US State Department. 2015 295:. European Commission. 2016 836: 15: 174:Retrieved 2016-10-16. 290:"Montenegro 2016 Report" 810:Freedom of information 496:Bosnia and Herzegovina 400:Cite journal requires 316:Cite journal requires 226:Cite journal requires 133:Freedom of information 95:administrative silence 77:According to the 2016 32:refer to the right of 28:freedom of information 34:access to information 712:States with limited 148:Media of Montenegro 79:European Commission 352:balcanicaucaso.org 820:Freedom of speech 797: 796: 255:Balkaninsight.com 111:According to the 827: 750:Dependencies and 454:Sovereign states 440: 433: 426: 417: 410: 409: 403: 398: 396: 388: 386: 384: 378: 370: 364: 363: 361: 359: 343: 326: 325: 319: 314: 312: 304: 302: 300: 294: 286: 267: 266: 264: 262: 247: 236: 235: 229: 224: 222: 214: 212: 210: 204: 196: 177: 175: 169: 835: 834: 830: 829: 828: 826: 825: 824: 800: 799: 798: 793: 751: 745: 731:Northern Cyprus 713: 707: 628:North Macedonia 449: 444: 414: 413: 399: 389: 382: 380: 376: 372: 371: 367: 357: 355: 345: 344: 329: 315: 305: 298: 296: 292: 288: 287: 270: 260: 258: 249: 248: 239: 225: 215: 208: 206: 202: 198: 197: 180: 173: 170: 166: 161: 124: 75: 57: 55:Legal framework 20: 12: 11: 5: 833: 831: 823: 822: 817: 812: 802: 801: 795: 794: 792: 791: 786: 781: 776: 771: 766: 761: 755: 753: 752:other entities 747: 746: 744: 743: 738: 733: 728: 723: 717: 715: 709: 708: 706: 705: 703:United Kingdom 700: 695: 690: 685: 680: 675: 670: 665: 660: 655: 650: 645: 640: 635: 630: 625: 620: 615: 610: 605: 600: 595: 590: 585: 580: 575: 570: 568: 563: 558: 553: 548: 543: 538: 533: 528: 523: 518: 516:Czech Republic 513: 508: 503: 498: 493: 488: 483: 478: 473: 468: 463: 457: 455: 451: 450: 445: 443: 442: 435: 428: 420: 412: 411: 402:|journal= 365: 327: 318:|journal= 268: 237: 228:|journal= 178: 163: 162: 160: 157: 156: 155: 150: 145: 140: 135: 130: 123: 120: 74: 71: 56: 53: 49:European Union 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 832: 821: 818: 816: 813: 811: 808: 807: 805: 790: 787: 785: 782: 780: 777: 775: 772: 770: 767: 765: 764:Faroe Islands 762: 760: 757: 756: 754: 748: 742: 739: 737: 736:South Ossetia 734: 732: 729: 727: 724: 722: 719: 718: 716: 710: 704: 701: 699: 696: 694: 691: 689: 686: 684: 681: 679: 676: 674: 671: 669: 666: 664: 661: 659: 656: 654: 651: 649: 646: 644: 641: 639: 636: 634: 631: 629: 626: 624: 621: 619: 616: 614: 611: 609: 606: 604: 601: 599: 596: 594: 591: 589: 588:Liechtenstein 586: 584: 581: 579: 576: 574: 571: 569: 567: 564: 562: 559: 557: 554: 552: 549: 547: 544: 542: 539: 537: 534: 532: 529: 527: 524: 522: 519: 517: 514: 512: 509: 507: 504: 502: 499: 497: 494: 492: 489: 487: 484: 482: 479: 477: 474: 472: 469: 467: 464: 462: 459: 458: 456: 452: 448: 441: 436: 434: 429: 427: 422: 421: 418: 407: 394: 375: 369: 366: 353: 349: 342: 340: 338: 336: 334: 332: 328: 323: 310: 291: 285: 283: 281: 279: 277: 275: 273: 269: 256: 252: 246: 244: 242: 238: 233: 220: 201: 195: 193: 191: 189: 187: 185: 183: 179: 176: 168: 165: 158: 154: 151: 149: 146: 144: 141: 139: 136: 134: 131: 129: 126: 125: 121: 119: 116: 114: 109: 106: 102: 98: 96: 90: 86: 84: 80: 72: 70: 66: 63: 54: 52: 50: 45: 43: 38: 35: 31: 29: 24: 19: 741:Transnistria 617: 393:cite journal 381:. Retrieved 368: 356:. Retrieved 351: 309:cite journal 297:. Retrieved 259:. Retrieved 254: 219:cite journal 207:. Retrieved 167: 117: 110: 107: 103: 99: 91: 87: 76: 67: 61: 58: 46: 39: 26: 22: 21: 779:Isle of Man 714:recognition 688:Switzerland 623:Netherlands 358:21 February 804:Categories 658:San Marino 618:Montenegro 598:Luxembourg 578:Kazakhstan 481:Azerbaijan 383:9 February 299:9 February 261:9 February 209:9 February 159:References 42:Montenegro 16:See also: 769:Gibraltar 593:Lithuania 789:Svalbard 774:Guernsey 721:Abkhazia 673:Slovenia 668:Slovakia 643:Portugal 501:Bulgaria 122:See also 698:Ukraine 648:Romania 608:Moldova 566:Ireland 561:Iceland 556:Hungary 546:Germany 541:Georgia 531:Finland 526:Estonia 521:Denmark 506:Croatia 491:Belgium 486:Belarus 476:Austria 471:Armenia 466:Andorra 461:Albania 83:Vijesti 815:Rights 784:Jersey 726:Kosovo 693:Turkey 683:Sweden 663:Serbia 653:Russia 638:Poland 633:Norway 613:Monaco 583:Latvia 551:Greece 536:France 511:Cyprus 759:Åland 678:Spain 603:Malta 573:Italy 377:(PDF) 293:(PDF) 203:(PDF) 30:(FOI) 406:help 385:2017 360:2017 322:help 301:2017 263:2017 232:help 211:2017 25:and 40:In 806:: 397:: 395:}} 391:{{ 350:. 330:^ 313:: 311:}} 307:{{ 271:^ 253:. 240:^ 223:: 221:}} 217:{{ 181:^ 439:e 432:t 425:v 408:) 404:( 387:. 362:. 324:) 320:( 303:. 265:. 234:) 230:( 213:.

Index

Access to public information in Europe
freedom of information
access to information
Montenegro
European Union
European Commission
Vijesti
administrative silence
Balkan Investigative Reporting Network
Access to public information in Europe
Freedom of information
Freedom of information laws by country
Transparency of media ownership in Europe
Media of Montenegro
Transparency of media ownership in Montenegro
Freedom of Information, UNESCO. Retrieved 2016-10-16.







"Freedom of information in Montenegro. Analysis of the Legal Framework, Practice and Implementation of ECHR Case Law and other International Standards with Recommendations for Improvement"
cite journal
help



"Montenegro Plan to Open Public Records Doubted"

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.