Knowledge (XXG)

Administrative subpoena

Source 📝

111: 471: 203:(OFAC) also frequently utilizes administrative subpoenas to initiate civil investigations of U.S. economic sanctions violations. OFAC subpoenas are typically to be responded to in 30 days and require the subpoenaed party to turn over full and complete information, as well as, supporting documentation to verify the information provided in the response. 25: 169: 181: 95: 541: 196: 512: 450: 292:"Administrative Subpoenas and National Security Letters in Criminal and Foreign Intelligence Investigations: Background and Proposed Adjustments" 87: 216: 211:
Courts typically exercise substantial deference to the agency requesting the subpoena in deciding whether to enforce it. The decision of a
43: 185: 267: 61: 531: 200: 161: 173: 165: 212: 505: 381: 259: 396:"Report to Congress on the Use of Administrative Subpoena Authorities by Executive Branch Agencies and Entities" 188:
has attempted to expand administrative subpoena authority to terrorism investigations through amendments to the
536: 232: 498: 456: 324: 546: 325:"We Don't Need No Stinking Warrant: The Disturbing, Unchecked Rise of the Administrative Subpoena" 220: 91: 263: 177: 146: 482: 395: 141:
Historical antecedents for the modern-day administrative subpoena date back as far as the
110: 525: 150: 142: 470: 189: 154: 153:
and subpoenas that were not subject to significant procedural safeguards or the
367:"Administrative Subpoenas Blur the Line between Civil and Criminal Enforcement" 366: 291: 94:. Critics say that administrative subpoena authority is a violation of the 172:. In 1996, Congress expanded the authority to issue the subpoenas to the 83: 79: 255: 98:, while proponents say that it provides a valuable investigative tool. 34:
provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject
184:. More recently, public law 106-544 dated December 19, 2000, the 160:
Administrative subpoenas have most commonly been issued by the
478: 105: 18: 170:
Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970
168:
was granted administrative subpoena authority under the
486: 122: 39: 435:
Federal Practice & Procedure (Wright & Miller)
182:
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
96:Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution 318: 316: 506: 8: 433:Koch, Charles H. (2020). "Judicial Review". 513: 499: 16:Subpoena issues without judicial oversight 420: 360: 358: 349: 215:to enforce an administrative subpoena is 62:Learn how and when to remove this message 197:United States Department of the Treasury 282: 365:Sklaire, Michael R. (December 2005). 44:providing more context for the reader 7: 467: 465: 485:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by 223:, itself a deferential standard. 164:of various federal agencies. The 14: 542:United States administrative law 469: 301:. Congressional Research Service 201:Office of Foreign Assets Control 162:Offices of the Inspector General 109: 23: 252:Is Administrative Law Unlawful? 174:Federal Bureau of Investigation 166:Drug Enforcement Administration 1: 323:Kravets, David (2012-08-28). 290:Doyle, Charles (2005-04-15). 382:Washington Legal Foundation 260:University of Chicago Press 563: 464: 250:Hamburger, Philip (2014). 400:US Department of Justice 233:National security letter 532:Legal terminology stubs 437:. Vol. 32. § 8145. 402:. US Justice department 299:CRS Report for Congress 76:administrative subpoena 457:137 S.Ct. 1159 186:Department of Justice 449:McLane Co., Inc. v. 374:Legal Opinion Letter 352:, pp. 134, 176. 221:abuse of discretion 176:when investigating 40:improve the article 459:, 1163 (2017). 147:prerogative courts 121:. You can help by 92:judicial oversight 494: 493: 178:health care fraud 139: 138: 72: 71: 64: 554: 515: 508: 501: 473: 466: 460: 454: 445: 439: 438: 430: 424: 418: 412: 411: 409: 407: 392: 386: 385: 371: 362: 353: 347: 341: 340: 338: 336: 320: 311: 310: 308: 306: 296: 287: 273: 207:Legal background 180:cases under the 134: 131: 113: 106: 67: 60: 56: 53: 47: 27: 26: 19: 562: 561: 557: 556: 555: 553: 552: 551: 537:Legal documents 522: 521: 520: 519: 463: 447: 446: 442: 432: 431: 427: 419: 415: 405: 403: 394: 393: 389: 369: 364: 363: 356: 348: 344: 334: 332: 322: 321: 314: 304: 302: 294: 289: 288: 284: 280: 270: 249: 246: 241: 229: 209: 149:, which issued 135: 129: 126: 119:needs expansion 104: 68: 57: 51: 48: 37: 28: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 560: 558: 550: 549: 544: 539: 534: 524: 523: 518: 517: 510: 503: 495: 492: 491: 474: 462: 461: 440: 425: 423:, p. 276. 421:Hamburger 2014 413: 387: 354: 350:Hamburger 2014 342: 312: 281: 279: 276: 275: 274: 268: 245: 242: 240: 237: 236: 235: 228: 225: 213:district court 208: 205: 137: 136: 116: 114: 103: 100: 90:without prior 88:federal agency 70: 69: 31: 29: 22: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 559: 548: 545: 543: 540: 538: 535: 533: 530: 529: 527: 516: 511: 509: 504: 502: 497: 496: 490: 488: 484: 481:article is a 480: 475: 472: 468: 458: 453: 452: 444: 441: 436: 429: 426: 422: 417: 414: 401: 397: 391: 388: 383: 379: 375: 368: 361: 359: 355: 351: 346: 343: 330: 326: 319: 317: 313: 300: 293: 286: 283: 277: 271: 269:9780226116457 265: 261: 257: 253: 248: 247: 243: 238: 234: 231: 230: 226: 224: 222: 218: 214: 206: 204: 202: 198: 193: 191: 187: 183: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 158: 156: 152: 148: 144: 133: 124: 120: 117:This section 115: 112: 108: 107: 101: 99: 97: 93: 89: 85: 81: 77: 66: 63: 55: 52:November 2020 45: 41: 35: 32:This article 30: 21: 20: 487:expanding it 476: 448: 443: 434: 428: 416: 404:. Retrieved 399: 390: 377: 373: 345: 333:. Retrieved 331:. Condé Nast 328: 303:. Retrieved 298: 285: 251: 210: 194: 159: 143:Star Chamber 140: 127: 123:adding to it 118: 86:issued by a 75: 73: 58: 49: 38:Please help 33: 547:Patriot Act 190:Patriot Act 155:rule of law 130:August 2012 526:Categories 479:legal term 335:August 29, 305:August 29, 278:References 239:References 406:5 October 329:wired.com 451:E.E.O.C. 227:See also 217:reviewed 151:warrants 145:and the 84:subpoena 80:U.S. law 256:Chicago 244:Sources 102:History 455:, 380:(23). 266:  78:under 477:This 370:(PDF) 295:(PDF) 82:is a 483:stub 408:2015 337:2012 307:2012 264:ISBN 219:for 195:The 199:'s 125:. 74:An 42:by 528:: 398:. 378:15 376:. 372:. 357:^ 327:. 315:^ 297:. 262:. 258:: 254:. 192:. 157:. 514:e 507:t 500:v 489:. 410:. 384:. 339:. 309:. 272:. 132:) 128:( 65:) 59:( 54:) 50:( 46:. 36:.

Index

improve the article
providing more context for the reader
Learn how and when to remove this message
U.S. law
subpoena
federal agency
judicial oversight
Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution

adding to it
Star Chamber
prerogative courts
warrants
rule of law
Offices of the Inspector General
Drug Enforcement Administration
Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970
Federal Bureau of Investigation
health care fraud
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Department of Justice
Patriot Act
United States Department of the Treasury
Office of Foreign Assets Control
district court
reviewed
abuse of discretion
National security letter
Chicago
University of Chicago Press

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.