Knowledge

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

Source 📝

31: 285:
A majority of the Supreme Court held that when a "clear and convincing" standard applies, it applies as well to summary judgment. It vacated the Court of Appeals' ruling and remanded the case for further proceedings. Justices Rehnquist, Burger and (separately) Brennan dissented on the grounds that
281:
had duly researched its statements and granted the motion. Summary judgment was reversed on appeal with respect to some of the alleged defamatory statements, with the Court of Appeals stating that evidence need not be clear and convincing for the purpose of summary judgment.
228:. Summary judgment will lie when, taking all factual inferences in the non-movant's favor, there exists no genuine issue as to a material fact and the movant deserves judgment as a matter of law. Because courts almost always cite 422: 97:
Summary judgment will not lie if the dispute about a material fact is "genuine," that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.
351: 72: 412: 407: 417: 35: 207: 265: 270: 221: 255:
antisemitic, racist and Fascist. Liberty Lobby and Carto sued Investigator Publishing and its publisher, journalist
256: 296: 389: 164: 120: 355: 64: 371: 144: 330: 326: 156: 152: 132: 362: 225: 112: 286:
the Court's reasoning was too abstract to provide the necessary guidance to lower courts.
300:(1986), another major case on summary judgment under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 380: 140: 401: 274: 248: 252: 67: 86:
115; 54 U.S.L.W. 4755; 4 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1041; 12 Media L. Rep. 2297
317:
Steinman, Adam (March 27, 2016). "The Rise and Fall of Plausibility Pleading?".
128: 83: 79: 232:
in their opinions for the standard regarding motions for summary judgment,
263:. The defendants moved for summary judgment under the standard set by 247:, an investigative news magazine, published three articles about the 260: 30: 181:
White, joined by Marshall, Blackmun, Powell, Stevens, O'Connor
54:
Jack Anderson, et al. v. Liberty Lobby, Incorporated, et al.
224:
case articulating the standard for a trial court to grant
423:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court
201: 193: 185: 177: 172: 101: 91: 59: 49: 42: 23: 208:Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8: 269:, which requires a plaintiff to prove with 251:, calling the organization and its founder 273:that a defamatory statement was made with 20: 413:United States summary judgment case law 309: 236:is the most cited Supreme Court case. 18:1986 United States Supreme Court case 7: 36:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 408:United States Supreme Court cases 358:242 (1986) is available from: 277:. The District Court ruled that 29: 217:Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. 24:Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. 418:1986 in United States case law 266:New York Times Co. v. Sullivan 1: 271:clear and convincing evidence 220:, 477 U.S. 242 (1986), is a 222:United States Supreme Court 197:Rehnquist, joined by Burger 439: 348:Anderson v. Liberty Lobby 206: 106: 96: 28: 297:Celotex Corp. v. Catrett 43:Argued December 3, 1985 121:William J. Brennan Jr. 319:Vanderbilt Law Review 45:Decided June 25, 1986 78:106 S. Ct. 2505; 91 390:Library of Congress 165:Sandra Day O'Connor 145:Lewis F. Powell Jr. 117:Associate Justices 213: 212: 153:William Rehnquist 133:Thurgood Marshall 430: 394: 388: 385: 379: 376: 370: 367: 361: 335: 334: 314: 279:The Investigator 245:The Investigator 226:summary judgment 113:Warren E. Burger 102:Court membership 33: 32: 21: 438: 437: 433: 432: 431: 429: 428: 427: 398: 397: 392: 386: 383: 377: 374: 368: 365: 359: 343: 338: 316: 315: 311: 307: 292: 242: 157:John P. Stevens 155: 143: 131: 87: 44: 38: 19: 12: 11: 5: 436: 434: 426: 425: 420: 415: 410: 400: 399: 396: 395: 372:Google Scholar 342: 341:External links 339: 337: 336: 308: 306: 303: 302: 301: 291: 288: 241: 238: 211: 210: 204: 203: 199: 198: 195: 191: 190: 187: 183: 182: 179: 175: 174: 170: 169: 168: 167: 141:Harry Blackmun 118: 115: 110: 104: 103: 99: 98: 94: 93: 89: 88: 77: 61: 57: 56: 51: 50:Full case name 47: 46: 40: 39: 34: 26: 25: 17: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 435: 424: 421: 419: 416: 414: 411: 409: 406: 405: 403: 391: 382: 373: 364: 357: 353: 349: 345: 344: 340: 332: 328: 324: 320: 313: 310: 304: 299: 298: 294: 293: 289: 287: 283: 280: 276: 275:actual malice 272: 268: 267: 262: 258: 257:Jack Anderson 254: 250: 249:Liberty Lobby 246: 239: 237: 235: 234:Liberty Lobby 231: 230:Liberty Lobby 227: 223: 219: 218: 209: 205: 200: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 173:Case opinions 171: 166: 162: 158: 154: 150: 146: 142: 138: 134: 130: 126: 122: 119: 116: 114: 111: 109:Chief Justice 108: 107: 105: 100: 95: 90: 85: 81: 75: 74: 69: 66: 62: 58: 55: 52: 48: 41: 37: 27: 22: 16: 347: 322: 318: 312: 295: 284: 278: 264: 253:Willis Carto 244: 243: 233: 229: 216: 215: 214: 202:Laws applied 160: 148: 136: 124: 71: 53: 15: 325:(333): 68. 129:Byron White 402:Categories 305:References 240:Background 84:U.S. LEXIS 82:202; 1986 80:L. Ed. 2d 60:Citations 346:Text of 290:See also 178:Majority 363:Findlaw 331:2753142 194:Dissent 189:Brennan 186:Dissent 92:Holding 393:  387:  384:  381:Justia 378:  375:  369:  366:  360:  329:  163: 161:· 159:  151: 149:· 147:  139: 137:· 135:  127: 125:· 123:  354: 261:libel 356:U.S. 327:SSRN 259:for 73:more 65:U.S. 63:477 352:477 68:242 404:: 350:, 323:69 321:. 333:. 76:) 70:(

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
U.S.
242
more
L. Ed. 2d
U.S. LEXIS
Warren E. Burger
William J. Brennan Jr.
Byron White
Thurgood Marshall
Harry Blackmun
Lewis F. Powell Jr.
William Rehnquist
John P. Stevens
Sandra Day O'Connor
Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
United States Supreme Court
summary judgment
Liberty Lobby
Willis Carto
Jack Anderson
libel
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
clear and convincing evidence
actual malice
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett
SSRN
2753142
477
U.S.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.