Knowledge (XXG)

Anti-tank mine

Source đź“ť

454:
the points where wheels touch the ground–where any detonations are likely to centre. Another way to protect a vehicle from mines was to attach wooden planks to the sides of armored vehicles to prevent enemy soldiers from attaching magnetic mines. In the close combat on Iwo Jima, for example, some tanks were protected in this manner. A Japanese soldier running up from a concealed foxhole would not be able to stick a magnetic mine on the side of a tank encased in wood. A simple, and highly effective, technique to protect the occupants of a wheeled vehicle is to fill the tires with water. This will have the effect of absorbing and deflecting the mine's blast energy. Steel plates between the cabin and the wheels can absorb the energy and their effectiveness is enhanced if they can be angled to deflect it away from the cabin. Increasing the distance between the wheels and passenger cabin, as is done on the South African
476: 171: 446: 396: 246: 212:, a thin rod standing approximately two feet up from the center of the charge and nearly impossible to see after the mine had been buried. As a tank passed over the mine, the rod was pushed forward, causing the charge to detonate directly beneath it. The blast often killed the crew and sometimes exploded onboard ammunition. Now that tank crews were directly at risk, they were less likely to plow through a minefield." 531: 286: 20: 442:
specially designed plow attached to the front end of a heavily armored tank is used to push aside the earth and any mines embedded in it, clearing a path as wide as the pushing tank. In pressure-forced detonation, a heavily armored tank pushes a heavy spherical or cylindrical solid metal roller ahead of it, causing mines to detonate.
369: 618: 637:
armoured fighting vehicle. They employed v-shaped hulls that deflected the blast force away from occupants. In most cases occupants survived anti-tank mine detonations with only minor injuries. The vehicles themselves could often be repaired by replacing the wheels or some drive train components that
453:
There are also several ways of making vehicles resistant to the effects of a mine detonation to reduce the chance of crew injury. In case of a mine's blast effect, this can be done by absorbing the blast energy, deflecting it away from the vehicle hull or increasing the distance between the crew and
359:
or be artillery fired. Cluster bombs contain several mines each, which could be a mixture of anti-personnel mines. When the cluster bomb reaches a preset altitude it disperses the mines over a wide area. Some anti-tank mines are designed to be fired by artillery, and arm themselves once they impact
510:
Furthermore, mobile detachments were tasked with laying more mines directly in the path of advancing enemy tanks. According to one source: "... Each artillery battalion and, in some cases, each artillery battery, had a mobile reserve of 5 to 8 combat engineers equipped with 4 to 5 mines each.
466:
Steel plates on the floor and sides and armoured glass will protect the occupants from fragments. Mounting seats from the sides or roof of the vehicle, rather than the floor, will help protect occupants from shocks transmitted through the structure of the vehicle and a four-point seat harness will
191:
was a purpose-built anti-tank mine developed during the period between the first and second world wars, the first model being introduced in 1929. Some variants were of a rectangular shape, but in all cases the outer casing served only as container for the explosives and fuze, without being used to
441:
Plofadder 160 AT, involve laying explosives across a minefield, either by propelling the charges across the field with rockets, or by dropping them from aircraft, and then detonating the explosive, clearing a path. Mechanical methods include plowing and pressure-forced detonation. In plowing, a
462:
vehicle uses a wedge-shaped passenger cabin, with the thin edge of the wedge downwards, to divert blast energy away from occupants. Improvised measures such as sandbags in the vehicle floor or bulletproof vests placed on the floor may offer a small measure of protection against tiny mines.
613:
Mines were often laid in complex arrangements. One tactic was to lay multiple mines on top of each other to increase the blast effect. Another common tactic was to link together several mines placed within a few metres of each other, so that all would detonate when any one was triggered.
203:
As one source has it: "Since they were pressure-detonated, these early anti-tank mines typically did most of their damage to a tank's treads, leaving its crew unharmed and its guns still operational but immobilised and vulnerable to aircraft and enemy anti-tank weapons ... During
518:, having planted six million mines of all types in Northern France alone. Mines were usually laid in staggered rows about 500 yards (460 meters) deep. Along with the anti-personnel types, there were various model of Tellermines, Topfmines, and Riegel mines. On the 161:
between the Soviet Union and Finland also saw widespread use of anti-tank mines. Finnish forces, facing a general shortage of anti-tank weapons, could exploit the predictable movements of motorized units imposed by difficult terrain and weather conditions.
134:. The mine, which was developed by Yegorov and Zelinskiy, had a 1 kg charge, which was enough to break the tracks of contemporary tanks. Meanwhile, in Germany, defeat spurred the development of anti-tank mines, with the first truly modern mine, the 610:, it was easy for small groups to infiltrate and lay their mines on roads before escaping again often undetected. The anti-tank mines were most often placed on public roads used by civilian and military vehicles and had a great psychological effect. 200:(among others). Because of its rather high operating pressure, a vehicle would need to pass directly over top of the mine to set it off. But since the tracks represent only about 20% of a tank's width, the pressure fuse had a limited area of effect. 102:, which was simply a wooden box packed with explosives and triggered either remotely or by a pressure fuze. By the end of the war, the Germans had developed row mining techniques, and mines accounted for 15% of U.S. tank casualties during the 379:
Off-route mines are designed to be effective when detonated next to a vehicle instead of underneath the vehicle. They are useful in cases where the ground or surface is not suitable for burying or concealing a mine. They normally employ a
414:
The term "off-route mine" refers to purpose-designed and manufactured anti-tank mines. Explosively Formed Projectiles (EFPs) are one type of IED that was used in Iraq, but most "home made" IEDs are not employed in this manner.
538:
During the Vietnam War, both 'regular' NVA and Viet Cong forces used AT mines. These were of Soviet, Chinese or local manufacture. Anti-tank mines were also used extensively in Cambodia and along the Thai border, planted by
522:, anti-tank mines were responsible for 20-22% of Allied tank losses. Since the majority of these mines were equipped with pressure fuzes (rather than tilt-rods), tanks were more often crippled than destroyed outright. 511:
Their function was to mine unguarded tank approaches after the direction of the enemy attack had been definitely ascertained. These mines proved highly effective in stopping and even in destroying many enemy tanks."
346:
Most modern mine bodies or casings are made of plastic material to avoid easy detection. They feature combinations of pressure or magnetically activated detonators to ensure that they are only triggered by vehicles.
467:
minimise the chance of injury if the vehicle is flung onto its side or its roof–a mine may throw a vehicle 5 – 10 m from the detonation point. Police and military can use a robot to remove mines from an area.
322:
More modern anti-tank mines are usually more advanced than simple containers full of explosives detonated by remote or the vehicles pressure. The biggest advances were made in the following areas:
231:
was a British anti-tank device that could be employed as a mine laid on the road surface for a tank to run over setting off a crush fuze or thrown at the tank in which case a timer fuze was used.
269:. These were long mines designed to increase the probability of a vehicle triggering it, the B2 consisted of multiple small shaped-charge explosive charges along its length designed to ensure a 625:
It was because of this threat that some of the first successful mine protected vehicles were developed by South African military and police forces. Chief amongst these were the
903: 238:
were also developed by Germany later in the war, although these did not see widespread use. The most advanced German anti-tank mine of the war was their minimal metal
355:
There are several systems for dispersing mines to quickly cover wide areas, as opposed to a soldier laying each one individually. These system can take the form of
83: 571:. What makes these conflicts significant to the study of anti-tank mines is that they featured the widespread use of these mines in situations other than 503:, combat engineers laid a staggering 503,663 AT mines, for a density of 1500 mines per kilometer. This was four times greater than what was seen in the 150:. Notably, Republican forces lifted mines placed by Nationalist forces and used them against the Nationalists. This spurred the development of 475: 170: 1025: 878: 411:
are more rarely encountered, though the British/French/German ARGES mine with a tandem warhead is an example of one of the more successful.
1109: 547:. Millions of these mines remain in the area, despite clearing efforts. It is estimated that they cause hundreds of deaths annually. 499:, where they were used in huge quantities by Soviet troops. The most common included the TM-41, TM-44, TMSB, YAM-5, and AKS. In the 914: 671: 458:
personnel carrier, is an effective technique, although there are mobility and ease of driving problems with such a vehicle. A
196:). Tellermine was the prototypical anti-tank mine, with many elements of its design emulated in the Pignone P-1, NR 25, and 385: 1135: 1094: 519: 496: 138:, entering service in 1929. It was a disc-shaped device approximately 30 cm across filled with about 5 kg of 389: 310:, or which ignore the first target vehicle to drive over it and therefore can be used against convoys or mine rollers) 743: 381: 403:
Due to the critical standoff necessary for penetration and the development of standoff neutralization technologies,
1130: 1145: 963: 107: 1140: 599: 193: 47: 115: 1115: 1041: 223:
and bombs designed to magnetically adhere to tanks were developed, they do not fall within the category of
103: 273:
against enemy vehicles by destroying their tracks. This form of mine was the inspiration for the British
235: 938: 687: 682: 666: 650: 572: 307: 151: 840: 621:
RG-31 Mine Protected Armored Personnel Carrier (MP APC) in service with the US Army in Iraq in 2006
54: 564: 87: 388:
principle has been used for some French and Soviet off route mines and has earned infamy as an
1021: 1017: 1011: 971: 874: 868: 828: 816: 676: 595: 568: 487:
Anti-tank mines have played an important role in most wars fought since they were first used.
266: 147: 130:
began developing mines in the early 1920s, and in 1924 produced its first anti-tank mine, the
31: 131: 504: 445: 395: 306:
more sophisticated fuzes (e.g. triggered by magnetic and seismic effects, which make a mine
543:'s Maoist guerrillas and the Vietnamese army, which invaded Cambodia in 1979 to topple the 297:
more effective explosive payloads (different explosive compounds and shaped charge effects)
1105: 893:
Leckie, Robert, The Battle for Iwo Jima, Random House, New York, copyright 1967, page 142.
796: 500: 111: 91: 86:
towards the end of the war. Initially they were nothing more than a buried high-explosive
79: 293:
Several advances have been made in the development of modern anti-tank mines, including:
579:) and also saw the development of effective mine resistant vehicles. As a result, both 433:, using either explosive methods or mechanical methods. Explosive methods, such as the 262: 245: 216: 139: 62: 989: 1124: 515: 408: 404: 333: 270: 209: 143: 135: 313:
sophisticated "anti-handling" devices to prevent or discourage tampering or removal.
760: 726: 560: 556: 356: 228: 205: 174: 127: 99: 1100: 784: 642: 544: 434: 274: 220: 180:
at the Museum of Heroic Defense and Liberation of Sevastopol on Sapun Mountain,
748: 732: 711: 584: 530: 188: 181: 177: 158: 24: 1042:"On Allied Tank Casualties in the ETO and German AT Weapons | For the Record" 975: 913:. Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining. 2004. Archived from 645:
peace keeping missions deploy modern developments of these vehicles like the
772: 634: 576: 285: 224: 39: 19: 146:
was developed in 1935. Anti-tank mines were used by both sides during the
715: 588: 430: 424: 384:
shaped charge to fire a penetrating slug through the target armour. This
373: 239: 1062: 699: 630: 607: 540: 455: 197: 57:, anti-tank mines typically have a much larger explosive charge, and a 638:
were designed to be modular and replaceable for exactly this reason.
626: 603: 580: 459: 514:
The Wehrmacht also relied heavily on anti-tank mines to defend the
1089: 654: 646: 616: 529: 480: 474: 444: 429:
The most effective countermeasure deployed against mine fields is
394: 368: 367: 284: 244: 227:
as they are not buried and detonated remotely or by pressure. The
169: 98:
upright. Later, purpose-built mines were developed, including the
18: 617: 555:
Conflict in southern Africa since the 1960s have often involved
438: 95: 58: 43: 327: 82:
as a countermeasure against the first tanks introduced by the
303:
new methods of deployment (from aircraft or with artillery)
300:
use of non-ferrous materials making them harder to detect
61:
designed to be triggered by vehicles or, in some cases,
806:
a WWII munition that was used as a mine, not a grenade.
602:
that covered vast sparsely populated area of southern
534:
M23 and M15 landmines have broadly similar mechanisms.
479:
The humanitarian landmine clearance project MASAM in
78:
The first anti-tank mines were improvised during the
587:
are littered with such devices to this day (as with
970:. U.S. Army Command and General Staff College: 19. 845: 833: 821: 801: 789: 777: 765: 753: 737: 720: 704: 42:designed to damage or destroy vehicles including 1063:"Humanitarian | Thomson Reuters Foundation News" 904:"A Study of Mechanical Application in Demining" 679:(provides extensive details of different types) 392:(IED) technique in Israel and especially Iraq. 208:they (the Wehrmacht) began using a mine with a 964:"Soviet Defensive Tactics at Kursk, July 1943" 939:"Uran-6 Mine-Clearing Robot - Army Technology" 342:More advanced or specific detonation triggers. 8: 867:Barrett Hazeltine; Christopher Bull (2003). 326:Power of the explosives (explosives such as 495:Anti-tank mines played a major role on the 16:Type of land mine designed to destroy tanks 399:How to use an American M-24 antitank mine 257:mines such as the German Tellermine were 990:"RUSSIAN ANTITANK TACTICS, January 1943" 38:(abbreviated to "AT mine") is a type of 859: 336:to increase the armour piercing effect. 289:Anti-tank mine used by the Indian Army 870:Field Guide to Appropriate Technology 7: 1016:. Rosen Publishing Group. pp.  14: 672:Swiss Foundation for Mine Action 633:armoured personnel carriers and 215:Although other measures such as 873:. Academic Press. p. 853. 754:United Kingdom, France, Germany 234:Shaped charge devices like the 65:or by tampering with the mine. 742:, an off route mine using the 567:armies or fighters engaged in 1: 1013:The Allied Invasion Of Europe 1116:Tank casualties during WWII 1095:German mines of World War 2 694:Examples of Anti-tank mines 641:Most countries involved in 390:improvised explosive device 339:Advanced dispersal systems. 1162: 422: 407:off-route mines using the 25:TM-46 anti-tank blast mine 992:. Lone Sentry. 2007-05-10 449:Casspir Personnel Carrier 192:destructive effect (e.g. 108:Third Battle of the Aisne 48:armored fighting vehicles 962:David M. Glantz (1986). 600:South African Border War 943:www.army-technology.com 386:self forging projectile 116:Meuse-Argonne Offensive 1106:German anti-tank mines 811:Mine dispersal systems 744:Misnay–Schardin effect 622: 535: 484: 450: 400: 376: 290: 250: 184: 104:Battle of Saint-Mihiel 27: 1010:Peter Darman (2012). 653:, United States) and 620: 533: 478: 448: 398: 371: 288: 249:German Riegel mine 43 248: 236:Hohl-Sprung mine 4672 173: 154:for anti-tank mines. 152:anti-handling devices 142:. A second mine, the 22: 1090:Mines Advisory Group 738:Soviet Union, Russia 688:Anti-handling device 683:Blast resistant mine 667:Mines Advisory Group 651:United Arab Emirates 573:conventional warfare 55:anti-personnel mines 1136:Area denial weapons 841:Volcano mine system 559:, United States or 261:such as the German 253:In contrast to the 1044:. 26 December 2013 623: 536: 485: 451: 401: 377: 291: 251: 185: 28: 1131:Explosive weapons 1027:978-1-4488-9234-1 880:978-0-12-335185-2 829:GATOR mine system 817:GEMSS mine system 677:List of landmines 596:Angolan Civil War 569:guerrilla warfare 360:the target area. 351:Dispersal systems 148:Spanish Civil War 32:anti-tank warfare 1153: 1146:Armoured warfare 1077: 1076: 1074: 1073: 1059: 1053: 1052: 1050: 1049: 1038: 1032: 1031: 1007: 1001: 1000: 998: 997: 986: 980: 979: 959: 953: 952: 950: 949: 935: 929: 928: 926: 925: 919: 911:Mechanical Study 908: 900: 894: 891: 885: 884: 864: 849: 847: 837: 835: 825: 823: 805: 803: 793: 791: 781: 779: 769: 767: 757: 755: 741: 739: 724: 722: 708: 706: 505:Battle of Moscow 491:Second World War 166:Second World War 122:Inter-War Period 1161: 1160: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1141:Anti-tank mines 1121: 1120: 1101:How Stuff Works 1086: 1081: 1080: 1071: 1069: 1061: 1060: 1056: 1047: 1045: 1040: 1039: 1035: 1028: 1009: 1008: 1004: 995: 993: 988: 987: 983: 961: 960: 956: 947: 945: 937: 936: 932: 923: 921: 917: 906: 902: 901: 897: 892: 888: 881: 866: 865: 861: 856: 843: 831: 819: 799: 797:Hawkins grenade 787: 775: 763: 751: 735: 718: 702: 663: 553: 551:Southern Africa 528: 501:Battle of Kursk 493: 473: 427: 421: 419:Countermeasures 382:Misnay–Schardin 366: 364:Off-route mines 353: 320: 308:blast resistant 283: 217:satchel charges 168: 140:high explosives 124: 112:Battle of Selle 80:First World War 76: 74:First World War 71: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1159: 1157: 1149: 1148: 1143: 1138: 1133: 1123: 1122: 1119: 1118: 1113: 1103: 1098: 1092: 1085: 1084:External links 1082: 1079: 1078: 1067:news.trust.org 1054: 1033: 1026: 1002: 981: 968:Kindle Edition 954: 930: 895: 886: 879: 858: 857: 855: 852: 851: 850: 838: 826: 813: 812: 808: 807: 802:United Kingdom 794: 782: 770: 758: 746: 730: 709: 696: 695: 691: 690: 685: 680: 674: 669: 662: 659: 643:Middle Eastern 552: 549: 527: 524: 492: 489: 472: 469: 423:Main article: 420: 417: 365: 362: 352: 349: 344: 343: 340: 337: 334:Shaped charges 331: 319: 316: 315: 314: 311: 304: 301: 298: 282: 279: 263:Riegel mine 43 167: 164: 123: 120: 94:bomb with its 75: 72: 70: 67: 36:anti-tank mine 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1158: 1147: 1144: 1142: 1139: 1137: 1134: 1132: 1129: 1128: 1126: 1117: 1114: 1111: 1107: 1104: 1102: 1099: 1096: 1093: 1091: 1088: 1087: 1083: 1068: 1064: 1058: 1055: 1043: 1037: 1034: 1029: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1014: 1006: 1003: 991: 985: 982: 977: 973: 969: 965: 958: 955: 944: 940: 934: 931: 920:on 2007-09-28 916: 912: 905: 899: 896: 890: 887: 882: 876: 872: 871: 863: 860: 853: 846:United States 842: 839: 834:United States 830: 827: 822:United States 818: 815: 814: 810: 809: 798: 795: 786: 783: 774: 771: 762: 759: 750: 747: 745: 734: 731: 728: 717: 713: 710: 701: 698: 697: 693: 692: 689: 686: 684: 681: 678: 675: 673: 670: 668: 665: 664: 660: 658: 656: 652: 648: 644: 639: 636: 632: 628: 619: 615: 611: 609: 606:and northern 605: 601: 597: 592: 590: 586: 582: 578: 574: 570: 566: 562: 561:South African 558: 550: 548: 546: 542: 532: 525: 523: 521: 520:Western front 517: 516:Atlantic Wall 512: 508: 506: 502: 498: 497:Eastern front 490: 488: 482: 477: 470: 468: 464: 461: 457: 447: 443: 440: 436: 432: 431:mine clearing 426: 418: 416: 412: 410: 409:Munroe effect 406: 405:shaped charge 397: 393: 391: 387: 383: 375: 370: 363: 361: 358: 357:cluster bombs 350: 348: 341: 338: 335: 332: 329: 325: 324: 323: 317: 312: 309: 305: 302: 299: 296: 295: 294: 287: 280: 278: 276: 272: 271:mobility kill 268: 264: 260: 256: 247: 243: 241: 237: 232: 230: 226: 222: 218: 213: 211: 210:tilt-rod fuze 207: 201: 199: 195: 190: 183: 179: 176: 172: 165: 163: 160: 155: 153: 149: 145: 144:Tellermine 35 141: 137: 136:Tellermine 29 133: 129: 121: 119: 117: 113: 109: 105: 101: 97: 93: 89: 85: 81: 73: 68: 66: 64: 60: 56: 51: 49: 45: 41: 37: 33: 26: 21: 1070:. Retrieved 1066: 1057: 1046:. Retrieved 1036: 1012: 1005: 994:. Retrieved 984: 967: 957: 946:. Retrieved 942: 933: 922:. Retrieved 915:the original 910: 898: 889: 869: 862: 761:FFV 028 mine 727:World War II 721:Nazi Germany 640: 624: 612: 593: 554: 537: 513: 509: 494: 486: 465: 452: 428: 413: 402: 378: 354: 345: 321: 292: 265:and Italian 258: 255:dinner plate 254: 252: 233: 229:Hawkins mine 221:sticky bombs 214: 206:World War II 202: 186: 156: 128:Soviet Union 125: 100:Flachmine 17 77: 53:Compared to 52: 35: 29: 1112:2009-10-25) 785:VS-HCT mine 575:(or static 545:Khmer Rouge 526:Vietnam War 435:Giant Viper 275:L9 bar mine 187:The German 1125:Categories 1072:2021-09-01 1048:2021-09-01 996:2015-10-23 948:2021-09-01 924:2007-07-23 854:References 749:ARGES mine 733:TM-83 mine 712:Tellermine 657:(Sweden). 585:Mozambique 577:minefields 563:supported 471:Combat use 225:land mines 189:Tellermine 182:Sevastopol 178:TM-35 mine 159:Winter War 23:A Russian 976:320412485 844:– ( 832:– ( 820:– ( 800:– ( 788:– ( 776:– ( 773:ATM 2000E 764:– ( 752:– ( 736:– ( 719:– ( 703:– ( 649:(Canada, 565:irregular 259:bar mines 40:land mine 1110:Archived 716:Topfmine 661:See also 589:Cambodia 437:and the 425:Demining 374:MPB mine 267:B-2 mine 240:Topfmine 194:shrapnel 63:remotely 778:Austria 700:Type 72 631:Casspir 608:Namibia 594:In the 541:Pol Pot 456:Casspir 372:Polish 198:M6 mine 132:EZ mine 84:British 69:History 1024:  974:  877:  766:Sweden 627:Buffel 604:Angola 581:Angola 557:Soviet 483:, 2022 460:V-hull 318:Design 281:Modern 175:Soviet 92:mortar 918:(PDF) 907:(PDF) 790:Italy 705:China 655:RG-32 647:RG-31 635:Ratel 481:Yemen 88:shell 44:tanks 34:, an 1022:ISBN 972:OCLC 875:ISBN 714:and 629:and 583:and 439:SADF 157:The 126:The 114:and 96:fuze 59:fuze 46:and 1018:8–9 598:or 591:). 328:RDX 90:or 30:In 1127:: 1065:. 1020:. 966:. 941:. 909:. 725:({ 507:. 330:). 277:. 242:. 219:, 118:. 110:, 106:, 50:. 1108:( 1097:. 1075:. 1051:. 1030:. 999:. 978:. 951:. 927:. 883:. 848:) 836:) 824:) 804:) 792:) 780:) 768:) 756:) 740:) 729:) 723:) 707:)

Index


TM-46 anti-tank blast mine
anti-tank warfare
land mine
tanks
armored fighting vehicles
anti-personnel mines
fuze
remotely
First World War
British
shell
mortar
fuze
Flachmine 17
Battle of Saint-Mihiel
Third Battle of the Aisne
Battle of Selle
Meuse-Argonne Offensive
Soviet Union
EZ mine
Tellermine 29
high explosives
Tellermine 35
Spanish Civil War
anti-handling devices
Winter War

Soviet
TM-35 mine

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑