Knowledge (XXG)

Anti-tank mine

Source đź“ť

465:
the points where wheels touch the ground–where any detonations are likely to centre. Another way to protect a vehicle from mines was to attach wooden planks to the sides of armored vehicles to prevent enemy soldiers from attaching magnetic mines. In the close combat on Iwo Jima, for example, some tanks were protected in this manner. A Japanese soldier running up from a concealed foxhole would not be able to stick a magnetic mine on the side of a tank encased in wood. A simple, and highly effective, technique to protect the occupants of a wheeled vehicle is to fill the tires with water. This will have the effect of absorbing and deflecting the mine's blast energy. Steel plates between the cabin and the wheels can absorb the energy and their effectiveness is enhanced if they can be angled to deflect it away from the cabin. Increasing the distance between the wheels and passenger cabin, as is done on the South African
487: 182: 457: 407: 257: 223:, a thin rod standing approximately two feet up from the center of the charge and nearly impossible to see after the mine had been buried. As a tank passed over the mine, the rod was pushed forward, causing the charge to detonate directly beneath it. The blast often killed the crew and sometimes exploded onboard ammunition. Now that tank crews were directly at risk, they were less likely to plow through a minefield." 542: 297: 31: 453:
specially designed plow attached to the front end of a heavily armored tank is used to push aside the earth and any mines embedded in it, clearing a path as wide as the pushing tank. In pressure-forced detonation, a heavily armored tank pushes a heavy spherical or cylindrical solid metal roller ahead of it, causing mines to detonate.
380: 629: 648:
armoured fighting vehicle. They employed v-shaped hulls that deflected the blast force away from occupants. In most cases occupants survived anti-tank mine detonations with only minor injuries. The vehicles themselves could often be repaired by replacing the wheels or some drive train components that
464:
There are also several ways of making vehicles resistant to the effects of a mine detonation to reduce the chance of crew injury. In case of a mine's blast effect, this can be done by absorbing the blast energy, deflecting it away from the vehicle hull or increasing the distance between the crew and
370:
or be artillery fired. Cluster bombs contain several mines each, which could be a mixture of anti-personnel mines. When the cluster bomb reaches a preset altitude it disperses the mines over a wide area. Some anti-tank mines are designed to be fired by artillery, and arm themselves once they impact
521:
Furthermore, mobile detachments were tasked with laying more mines directly in the path of advancing enemy tanks. According to one source: "... Each artillery battalion and, in some cases, each artillery battery, had a mobile reserve of 5 to 8 combat engineers equipped with 4 to 5 mines each.
477:
Steel plates on the floor and sides and armoured glass will protect the occupants from fragments. Mounting seats from the sides or roof of the vehicle, rather than the floor, will help protect occupants from shocks transmitted through the structure of the vehicle and a four-point seat harness will
202:
was a purpose-built anti-tank mine developed during the period between the first and second world wars, the first model being introduced in 1929. Some variants were of a rectangular shape, but in all cases the outer casing served only as container for the explosives and fuze, without being used to
452:
Plofadder 160 AT, involve laying explosives across a minefield, either by propelling the charges across the field with rockets, or by dropping them from aircraft, and then detonating the explosive, clearing a path. Mechanical methods include plowing and pressure-forced detonation. In plowing, a
473:
vehicle uses a wedge-shaped passenger cabin, with the thin edge of the wedge downwards, to divert blast energy away from occupants. Improvised measures such as sandbags in the vehicle floor or bulletproof vests placed on the floor may offer a small measure of protection against tiny mines.
624:
Mines were often laid in complex arrangements. One tactic was to lay multiple mines on top of each other to increase the blast effect. Another common tactic was to link together several mines placed within a few metres of each other, so that all would detonate when any one was triggered.
214:
As one source has it: "Since they were pressure-detonated, these early anti-tank mines typically did most of their damage to a tank's treads, leaving its crew unharmed and its guns still operational but immobilised and vulnerable to aircraft and enemy anti-tank weapons ... During
529:, having planted six million mines of all types in Northern France alone. Mines were usually laid in staggered rows about 500 yards (460 meters) deep. Along with the anti-personnel types, there were various model of Tellermines, Topfmines, and Riegel mines. On the 172:
between the Soviet Union and Finland also saw widespread use of anti-tank mines. Finnish forces, facing a general shortage of anti-tank weapons, could exploit the predictable movements of motorized units imposed by difficult terrain and weather conditions.
145:. The mine, which was developed by Yegorov and Zelinskiy, had a 1 kg charge, which was enough to break the tracks of contemporary tanks. Meanwhile, in Germany, defeat spurred the development of anti-tank mines, with the first truly modern mine, the 621:, it was easy for small groups to infiltrate and lay their mines on roads before escaping again often undetected. The anti-tank mines were most often placed on public roads used by civilian and military vehicles and had a great psychological effect. 211:(among others). Because of its rather high operating pressure, a vehicle would need to pass directly over top of the mine to set it off. But since the tracks represent only about 20% of a tank's width, the pressure fuse had a limited area of effect. 113:, which was simply a wooden box packed with explosives and triggered either remotely or by a pressure fuze. By the end of the war, the Germans had developed row mining techniques, and mines accounted for 15% of U.S. tank casualties during the 390:
Off-route mines are designed to be effective when detonated next to a vehicle instead of underneath the vehicle. They are useful in cases where the ground or surface is not suitable for burying or concealing a mine. They normally employ a
425:
The term "off-route mine" refers to purpose-designed and manufactured anti-tank mines. Explosively Formed Projectiles (EFPs) are one type of IED that was used in Iraq, but most "home made" IEDs are not employed in this manner.
549:
During the Vietnam War, both 'regular' NVA and Viet Cong forces used AT mines. These were of Soviet, Chinese or local manufacture. Anti-tank mines were also used extensively in Cambodia and along the Thai border, planted by
533:, anti-tank mines were responsible for 20-22% of Allied tank losses. Since the majority of these mines were equipped with pressure fuzes (rather than tilt-rods), tanks were more often crippled than destroyed outright. 522:
Their function was to mine unguarded tank approaches after the direction of the enemy attack had been definitely ascertained. These mines proved highly effective in stopping and even in destroying many enemy tanks."
357:
Most modern mine bodies or casings are made of plastic material to avoid easy detection. They feature combinations of pressure or magnetically activated detonators to ensure that they are only triggered by vehicles.
478:
minimise the chance of injury if the vehicle is flung onto its side or its roof–a mine may throw a vehicle 5 – 10 m from the detonation point. Police and military can use a robot to remove mines from an area.
333:
More modern anti-tank mines are usually more advanced than simple containers full of explosives detonated by remote or the vehicles pressure. The biggest advances were made in the following areas:
242:
was a British anti-tank device that could be employed as a mine laid on the road surface for a tank to run over setting off a crush fuze or thrown at the tank in which case a timer fuze was used.
280:. These were long mines designed to increase the probability of a vehicle triggering it, the B2 consisted of multiple small shaped-charge explosive charges along its length designed to ensure a 636:
It was because of this threat that some of the first successful mine protected vehicles were developed by South African military and police forces. Chief amongst these were the
914: 249:
were also developed by Germany later in the war, although these did not see widespread use. The most advanced German anti-tank mine of the war was their minimal metal
366:
There are several systems for dispersing mines to quickly cover wide areas, as opposed to a soldier laying each one individually. These system can take the form of
94: 582:. What makes these conflicts significant to the study of anti-tank mines is that they featured the widespread use of these mines in situations other than 514:, combat engineers laid a staggering 503,663 AT mines, for a density of 1500 mines per kilometer. This was four times greater than what was seen in the 161:. Notably, Republican forces lifted mines placed by Nationalist forces and used them against the Nationalists. This spurred the development of 486: 181: 1036: 889: 422:
are more rarely encountered, though the British/French/German ARGES mine with a tandem warhead is an example of one of the more successful.
1120: 558:. Millions of these mines remain in the area, despite clearing efforts. It is estimated that they cause hundreds of deaths annually. 510:, where they were used in huge quantities by Soviet troops. The most common included the TM-41, TM-44, TMSB, YAM-5, and AKS. In the 925: 682: 469:
personnel carrier, is an effective technique, although there are mobility and ease of driving problems with such a vehicle. A
207:). Tellermine was the prototypical anti-tank mine, with many elements of its design emulated in the Pignone P-1, NR 25, and 396: 1146: 1105: 530: 507: 149:, entering service in 1929. It was a disc-shaped device approximately 30 cm across filled with about 5 kg of 400: 321:, or which ignore the first target vehicle to drive over it and therefore can be used against convoys or mine rollers) 754: 392: 414:
Due to the critical standoff necessary for penetration and the development of standoff neutralization technologies,
1141: 1156: 974: 118: 1151: 610: 204: 58: 126: 1126: 1052: 234:
and bombs designed to magnetically adhere to tanks were developed, they do not fall within the category of
114: 284:
against enemy vehicles by destroying their tracks. This form of mine was the inspiration for the British
246: 949: 698: 693: 677: 661: 583: 318: 162: 851: 632:
RG-31 Mine Protected Armored Personnel Carrier (MP APC) in service with the US Army in Iraq in 2006
65: 575: 98: 399:
principle has been used for some French and Soviet off route mines and has earned infamy as an
1032: 1028: 1022: 982: 885: 879: 839: 827: 687: 606: 579: 498:
Anti-tank mines have played an important role in most wars fought since they were first used.
277: 158: 141:
began developing mines in the early 1920s, and in 1924 produced its first anti-tank mine, the
42: 142: 515: 456: 406: 317:
more sophisticated fuzes (e.g. triggered by magnetic and seismic effects, which make a mine
554:'s Maoist guerrillas and the Vietnamese army, which invaded Cambodia in 1979 to topple the 308:
more effective explosive payloads (different explosive compounds and shaped charge effects)
1116: 904:
Leckie, Robert, The Battle for Iwo Jima, Random House, New York, copyright 1967, page 142.
807: 511: 122: 102: 97:
towards the end of the war. Initially they were nothing more than a buried high-explosive
90: 304:
Several advances have been made in the development of modern anti-tank mines, including:
590:) and also saw the development of effective mine resistant vehicles. As a result, both 444:, using either explosive methods or mechanical methods. Explosive methods, such as the 273: 256: 227: 150: 73: 1000: 1135: 526: 419: 415: 344: 281: 220: 154: 146: 324:
sophisticated "anti-handling" devices to prevent or discourage tampering or removal.
771: 737: 571: 567: 367: 239: 216: 185: 138: 110: 1111: 795: 653: 555: 445: 285: 231: 191:
at the Museum of Heroic Defense and Liberation of Sevastopol on Sapun Mountain,
759: 743: 722: 595: 541: 199: 192: 188: 169: 35: 1053:"On Allied Tank Casualties in the ETO and German AT Weapons | For the Record" 986: 924:. Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining. 2004. Archived from 656:
peace keeping missions deploy modern developments of these vehicles like the
17: 783: 645: 587: 296: 235: 50: 30: 157:
was developed in 1935. Anti-tank mines were used by both sides during the
726: 599: 441: 435: 395:
shaped charge to fire a penetrating slug through the target armour. This
384: 250: 1073: 710: 641: 618: 551: 466: 208: 68:, anti-tank mines typically have a much larger explosive charge, and a 649:
were designed to be modular and replaceable for exactly this reason.
637: 614: 591: 470: 525:
The Wehrmacht also relied heavily on anti-tank mines to defend the
1100: 665: 657: 627: 540: 491: 485: 455: 440:
The most effective countermeasure deployed against mine fields is
405: 379: 378: 295: 255: 238:
as they are not buried and detonated remotely or by pressure. The
180: 109:
upright. Later, purpose-built mines were developed, including the
29: 628: 566:
Conflict in southern Africa since the 1960s have often involved
449: 106: 69: 54: 338: 93:
as a countermeasure against the first tanks introduced by the
314:
new methods of deployment (from aircraft or with artillery)
311:
use of non-ferrous materials making them harder to detect
72:
designed to be triggered by vehicles or, in some cases,
817:
a WWII munition that was used as a mine, not a grenade.
613:
that covered vast sparsely populated area of southern
545:
M23 and M15 landmines have broadly similar mechanisms.
490:
The humanitarian landmine clearance project MASAM in
89:
The first anti-tank mines were improvised during the
598:
are littered with such devices to this day (as with
981:. U.S. Army Command and General Staff College: 19. 856: 844: 832: 812: 800: 788: 776: 764: 748: 731: 715: 53:designed to damage or destroy vehicles including 1074:"Humanitarian | Thomson Reuters Foundation News" 915:"A Study of Mechanical Application in Demining" 690:(provides extensive details of different types) 403:(IED) technique in Israel and especially Iraq. 219:they (the Wehrmacht) began using a mine with a 975:"Soviet Defensive Tactics at Kursk, July 1943" 950:"Uran-6 Mine-Clearing Robot - Army Technology" 353:More advanced or specific detonation triggers. 8: 878:Barrett Hazeltine; Christopher Bull (2003). 337:Power of the explosives (explosives such as 506:Anti-tank mines played a major role on the 27:Type of land mine designed to destroy tanks 410:How to use an American M-24 antitank mine 268:mines such as the German Tellermine were 1001:"RUSSIAN ANTITANK TACTICS, January 1943" 49:(abbreviated to "AT mine") is a type of 870: 347:to increase the armour piercing effect. 300:Anti-tank mine used by the Indian Army 881:Field Guide to Appropriate Technology 7: 1027:. Rosen Publishing Group. pp.  25: 683:Swiss Foundation for Mine Action 644:armoured personnel carriers and 226:Although other measures such as 884:. Academic Press. p. 853. 765:United Kingdom, France, Germany 245:Shaped charge devices like the 76:or by tampering with the mine. 753:, an off route mine using the 578:armies or fighters engaged in 1: 1024:The Allied Invasion Of Europe 1127:Tank casualties during WWII 1106:German mines of World War 2 705:Examples of Anti-tank mines 652:Most countries involved in 401:improvised explosive device 350:Advanced dispersal systems. 1173: 433: 418:off-route mines using the 36:TM-46 anti-tank blast mine 1003:. Lone Sentry. 2007-05-10 460:Casspir Personnel Carrier 203:destructive effect (e.g. 119:Third Battle of the Aisne 59:armored fighting vehicles 973:David M. Glantz (1986). 611:South African Border War 954:www.army-technology.com 397:self forging projectile 127:Meuse-Argonne Offensive 1117:German anti-tank mines 822:Mine dispersal systems 755:Misnay–Schardin effect 633: 546: 495: 461: 411: 387: 301: 261: 195: 115:Battle of Saint-Mihiel 38: 1021:Peter Darman (2012). 664:, United States) and 631: 544: 489: 459: 409: 382: 299: 260:German Riegel mine 43 259: 247:Hohl-Sprung mine 4672 184: 165:for anti-tank mines. 163:anti-handling devices 153:. A second mine, the 33: 1101:Mines Advisory Group 749:Soviet Union, Russia 699:Anti-handling device 694:Blast resistant mine 678:Mines Advisory Group 662:United Arab Emirates 584:conventional warfare 66:anti-personnel mines 1147:Area denial weapons 852:Volcano mine system 570:, United States or 272:such as the German 264:In contrast to the 1055:. 26 December 2013 634: 547: 496: 462: 412: 388: 302: 262: 196: 39: 1142:Explosive weapons 1038:978-1-4488-9234-1 891:978-0-12-335185-2 840:GATOR mine system 828:GEMSS mine system 688:List of landmines 607:Angolan Civil War 580:guerrilla warfare 371:the target area. 362:Dispersal systems 159:Spanish Civil War 43:anti-tank warfare 16:(Redirected from 1164: 1157:Armoured warfare 1088: 1087: 1085: 1084: 1070: 1064: 1063: 1061: 1060: 1049: 1043: 1042: 1018: 1012: 1011: 1009: 1008: 997: 991: 990: 970: 964: 963: 961: 960: 946: 940: 939: 937: 936: 930: 922:Mechanical Study 919: 911: 905: 902: 896: 895: 875: 860: 858: 848: 846: 836: 834: 816: 814: 804: 802: 792: 790: 780: 778: 768: 766: 752: 750: 735: 733: 719: 717: 516:Battle of Moscow 502:Second World War 177:Second World War 133:Inter-War Period 21: 1172: 1171: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1152:Anti-tank mines 1132: 1131: 1112:How Stuff Works 1097: 1092: 1091: 1082: 1080: 1072: 1071: 1067: 1058: 1056: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1039: 1020: 1019: 1015: 1006: 1004: 999: 998: 994: 972: 971: 967: 958: 956: 948: 947: 943: 934: 932: 928: 917: 913: 912: 908: 903: 899: 892: 877: 876: 872: 867: 854: 842: 830: 810: 808:Hawkins grenade 798: 786: 774: 762: 746: 729: 713: 674: 564: 562:Southern Africa 539: 512:Battle of Kursk 504: 484: 438: 432: 430:Countermeasures 393:Misnay–Schardin 377: 375:Off-route mines 364: 331: 319:blast resistant 294: 228:satchel charges 179: 151:high explosives 135: 123:Battle of Selle 91:First World War 87: 85:First World War 82: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1170: 1168: 1160: 1159: 1154: 1149: 1144: 1134: 1133: 1130: 1129: 1124: 1114: 1109: 1103: 1096: 1095:External links 1093: 1090: 1089: 1078:news.trust.org 1065: 1044: 1037: 1013: 992: 979:Kindle Edition 965: 941: 906: 897: 890: 869: 868: 866: 863: 862: 861: 849: 837: 824: 823: 819: 818: 813:United Kingdom 805: 793: 781: 769: 757: 741: 720: 707: 706: 702: 701: 696: 691: 685: 680: 673: 670: 654:Middle Eastern 563: 560: 538: 535: 503: 500: 483: 480: 434:Main article: 431: 428: 376: 373: 363: 360: 355: 354: 351: 348: 345:Shaped charges 342: 330: 327: 326: 325: 322: 315: 312: 309: 293: 290: 274:Riegel mine 43 178: 175: 134: 131: 105:bomb with its 86: 83: 81: 78: 47:anti-tank mine 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1169: 1158: 1155: 1153: 1150: 1148: 1145: 1143: 1140: 1139: 1137: 1128: 1125: 1122: 1118: 1115: 1113: 1110: 1107: 1104: 1102: 1099: 1098: 1094: 1079: 1075: 1069: 1066: 1054: 1048: 1045: 1040: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1025: 1017: 1014: 1002: 996: 993: 988: 984: 980: 976: 969: 966: 955: 951: 945: 942: 931:on 2007-09-28 927: 923: 916: 910: 907: 901: 898: 893: 887: 883: 882: 874: 871: 864: 857:United States 853: 850: 845:United States 841: 838: 833:United States 829: 826: 825: 821: 820: 809: 806: 797: 794: 785: 782: 773: 770: 761: 758: 756: 745: 742: 739: 728: 724: 721: 712: 709: 708: 704: 703: 700: 697: 695: 692: 689: 686: 684: 681: 679: 676: 675: 671: 669: 667: 663: 659: 655: 650: 647: 643: 639: 630: 626: 622: 620: 617:and northern 616: 612: 608: 603: 601: 597: 593: 589: 585: 581: 577: 573: 572:South African 569: 561: 559: 557: 553: 543: 536: 534: 532: 531:Western front 528: 527:Atlantic Wall 523: 519: 517: 513: 509: 508:Eastern front 501: 499: 493: 488: 481: 479: 475: 472: 468: 458: 454: 451: 447: 443: 442:mine clearing 437: 429: 427: 423: 421: 420:Munroe effect 417: 416:shaped charge 408: 404: 402: 398: 394: 386: 381: 374: 372: 369: 368:cluster bombs 361: 359: 352: 349: 346: 343: 340: 336: 335: 334: 328: 323: 320: 316: 313: 310: 307: 306: 305: 298: 291: 289: 287: 283: 282:mobility kill 279: 275: 271: 267: 258: 254: 252: 248: 243: 241: 237: 233: 229: 224: 222: 221:tilt-rod fuze 218: 212: 210: 206: 201: 194: 190: 187: 183: 176: 174: 171: 166: 164: 160: 156: 155:Tellermine 35 152: 148: 147:Tellermine 29 144: 140: 132: 130: 128: 124: 120: 116: 112: 108: 104: 100: 96: 92: 84: 79: 77: 75: 71: 67: 62: 60: 56: 52: 48: 44: 37: 32: 19: 18:Antitank mine 1081:. Retrieved 1077: 1068: 1057:. Retrieved 1047: 1023: 1016: 1005:. Retrieved 995: 978: 968: 957:. Retrieved 953: 944: 933:. Retrieved 926:the original 921: 909: 900: 880: 873: 772:FFV 028 mine 738:World War II 732:Nazi Germany 651: 635: 623: 604: 565: 548: 524: 520: 505: 497: 476: 463: 439: 424: 413: 389: 365: 356: 332: 303: 276:and Italian 269: 266:dinner plate 265: 263: 244: 240:Hawkins mine 232:sticky bombs 225: 217:World War II 213: 197: 167: 139:Soviet Union 136: 111:Flachmine 17 88: 64:Compared to 63: 46: 40: 1123:2009-10-25) 796:VS-HCT mine 586:(or static 556:Khmer Rouge 537:Vietnam War 446:Giant Viper 286:L9 bar mine 198:The German 1136:Categories 1083:2021-09-01 1059:2021-09-01 1007:2015-10-23 959:2021-09-01 935:2007-07-23 865:References 760:ARGES mine 744:TM-83 mine 723:Tellermine 668:(Sweden). 596:Mozambique 588:minefields 574:supported 482:Combat use 236:land mines 200:Tellermine 193:Sevastopol 189:TM-35 mine 170:Winter War 34:A Russian 987:320412485 855:– ( 843:– ( 831:– ( 811:– ( 799:– ( 787:– ( 784:ATM 2000E 775:– ( 763:– ( 747:– ( 730:– ( 714:– ( 660:(Canada, 576:irregular 270:bar mines 51:land mine 1121:Archived 727:Topfmine 672:See also 600:Cambodia 448:and the 436:Demining 385:MPB mine 278:B-2 mine 251:Topfmine 205:shrapnel 74:remotely 789:Austria 711:Type 72 642:Casspir 619:Namibia 605:In the 552:Pol Pot 467:Casspir 383:Polish 209:M6 mine 143:EZ mine 95:British 80:History 1035:  985:  888:  777:Sweden 638:Buffel 615:Angola 592:Angola 568:Soviet 494:, 2022 471:V-hull 329:Design 292:Modern 186:Soviet 103:mortar 929:(PDF) 918:(PDF) 801:Italy 716:China 666:RG-32 658:RG-31 646:Ratel 492:Yemen 99:shell 55:tanks 45:, an 1033:ISBN 983:OCLC 886:ISBN 725:and 640:and 594:and 450:SADF 168:The 137:The 125:and 107:fuze 70:fuze 57:and 1029:8–9 609:or 602:). 339:RDX 101:or 41:In 1138:: 1076:. 1031:. 977:. 952:. 920:. 736:({ 518:. 341:). 288:. 253:. 230:, 129:. 121:, 117:, 61:. 1119:( 1108:. 1086:. 1062:. 1041:. 1010:. 989:. 962:. 938:. 894:. 859:) 847:) 835:) 815:) 803:) 791:) 779:) 767:) 751:) 740:) 734:) 718:) 20:)

Index

Antitank mine

TM-46 anti-tank blast mine
anti-tank warfare
land mine
tanks
armored fighting vehicles
anti-personnel mines
fuze
remotely
First World War
British
shell
mortar
fuze
Flachmine 17
Battle of Saint-Mihiel
Third Battle of the Aisne
Battle of Selle
Meuse-Argonne Offensive
Soviet Union
EZ mine
Tellermine 29
high explosives
Tellermine 35
Spanish Civil War
anti-handling devices
Winter War

Soviet

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑