Knowledge

Intransitivity

Source 📝

761: 805:, a preference relation with a loop is not transitive. For if it is, each option in the loop is preferred to each option, including itself. This can be illustrated for this example of a loop among A, B, and C. Assume the relation is transitive. Then, since A is preferred to B and B is preferred to C, also A is preferred to C. But then, since C is preferred to A, also A is preferred to A. 896:
The first argument of the relation is a row and the second one is a column. Ones indicate the relation holds, zero indicates that it does not hold. Now, notice that the following statement is true for any pair of elements x and y drawn (with replacement) from the set {rock, scissors, paper}: If x
833:
is an example. The relation over rock, paper, and scissors is "defeats", and the standard rules of the game are such that rock defeats scissors, scissors defeats paper, and paper defeats rock. Furthermore, it is also true that scissors does not defeat rock, paper does not defeat scissors, and rock
825:
possesses cycles but is transitive. Now, consider the relation "is an enemy of" and suppose that the relation is symmetric and satisfies the condition that for any country, any enemy of an enemy of the country is not itself an enemy of the country. This is an example of an antitransitive relation
990:
tends to eliminate "intransitive loops" when large numbers of voters participate because the overall assessment criteria for voters balances out. For instance, voters may prefer candidates on several different units of measure such as by order of social consciousness or by order of most fiscally
680: 524: 184: 448: 269: 764:
Sometimes, when people are asked their preferences through a series of binary questions, they will give logically impossible responses: 1 is better than 2, and 2 is better than 3, but 3 is better than
529: 798:
are examples. Real combative relations of competing species, strategies of individual animals, and fights of remote-controlled vehicles in BattleBots shows ("robot Darwinism") can be cyclic as well.
335:: in some instances lodge A recognizes lodge B, and lodge B recognizes lodge C, but lodge A does not recognize lodge C. Thus the recognition relation among Masonic lodges is intransitive. 773:
is often used when speaking of scenarios in which a relation describes the relative preferences between pairs of options, and weighing several options produces a "loop" of preference:
358:
relation is not transitive, but it still contains some transitivity: for instance, humans feed on rabbits, rabbits feed on carrots, and humans also feed on carrots.
100: 95: 73:
A relation is transitive if, whenever it relates some A to some B, and that B to some C, it also relates that A to that C. Some authors call a relation
675:{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}&\forall a,b,c:aRb\land aRc\implies \lnot (bRc)\\&\forall a,b,c:aRc\land bRc\implies \lnot (aRb)\end{aligned}}} 1092: 977:. Economists and philosophers have questioned whether violations of transitivity must necessarily lead to 'irrational behaviour' (see Anand (1993)). 368: 994:
In such cases intransitivity reduces to a broader equation of numbers of people and the weights of their units of measure in assessing candidates.
1354: 191: 1067: 1050: 1254: 1229: 510:. If player A defeated player B and player B defeated player C, A can have never played C, and therefore, A has not defeated C. 834:
does not defeat paper. Finally, it is also true that no option defeats itself. This information can be depicted in a table:
28: 821:
Notice that a cycle is neither necessary nor sufficient for a binary relation to be not transitive. For example, an
301:
3 (6 is a multiple of 3), but 2 is neither a multiple nor a divisor of 3. This does not imply that the relation is
1016: 826:
that does not have any cycles. In particular, by virtue of being antitransitive the relation is not transitive.
921:
method in which ranking several candidates can produce a loop of preference when the weights are compared (see
1096: 966: 830: 787: 709: 514: 1218: 1265: 1323: 1177: 822: 810: 705: 691: 507: 348: 58: 54: 1011:
While each voter may not assess the units of measure identically, the trend then becomes a single
1313: 1288: 1201: 1012: 970: 1193: 1046: 955: 928: 900:
Thus, a cycle is neither necessary nor sufficient for a binary relation to be antitransitive.
791: 1219:
Leutwyler, K. (2000). Mating Lizards Play a Game of Rock-Paper-Scissors. Scientific American.
897:
defeats y, and y defeats z, then x does not defeat z. Hence the relation is antitransitive.
1331: 1280: 1185: 1168:(2002). "Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real-life game of rock–paper–scissors". 1165: 987: 918: 795: 1255:
Bar-Hillel, M., & Margalit, A. (1988). How vicious are cycles of intransitive choice?
1071: 760: 698: 324:, wolves feed on deer, and deer feed on grass, but wolves do not feed on grass. Thus, the 50: 1327: 1181: 922: 80: 17: 1348: 910: 1292: 1205: 947: 1007:
20% favor a 40/60 weighting between social consciousness and fiscal conservatism
974: 914: 802: 332: 38: 1284: 1004:
50% favor 50/50 weighting between social consciousness and fiscal conservatism
1001:
30% favor 60/40 weighting between social consciousness and fiscal conservatism
951: 943: 321: 712:) unique relation is always anti-transitive. An example of the former is the 962: 1197: 179:{\displaystyle \lnot \left(\forall a,b,c:aRb\land bRc\implies aRc\right).} 27:
This article is about intransitivity in mathematics. For other uses, see
1189: 77:
if it is not transitive, that is, (if the relation in question is named
1336: 1301: 517:, each of the following formulas is equivalent to antitransitivity of 1230:
Atherton, K. D. (2013). A brief history of the demise of battle bots.
1318: 759: 331:
Another example that does not involve preference loops arises in
1043:
Wild Health: Lessons in Natural Wellness from the Animal Kingdom
801:
Assuming no option is preferred to itself i.e. the relation is
443:{\displaystyle \forall a,b,c:aRb\land bRc\implies \lnot (aRc).} 57:. This may include any relation that is not transitive, or the 701:. On a 3-element set, the depicted cycle has both properties. 1266:"Complexity and intransitivity in technological development" 697:
An antitransitive relation on a set of ≥4 elements is never
264:{\displaystyle \exists a,b,c:aRb\land bRc\land \lnot (aRc).} 328:
relation among life forms is intransitive, in this sense.
1164:
Kerr, Benjamin; Riley, Margaret A.; Feldman, Marcus W.;
65:, which describes a relation that is never transitive. 293:. This relation is intransitive since, for example, 2 1045:(paperback ed.). Houghton Mifflin. p. 141. 1019:
agrees is a preferred balance of candidate criteria.
527: 371: 194: 103: 83: 502:
A second example of an antitransitive relation: the
1273:Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 674: 442: 263: 178: 89: 958:), potentially leading to unresolvable conflicts. 1302:"Intransitivity in Theory and in the Real World" 939:more than half the time" need not be transitive. 8: 946:, intransitivity often occurs in a person's 649: 645: 579: 575: 418: 414: 158: 154: 1335: 1317: 1247:Foundations of Rational Choice Under Risk 965:intransitivity can occur in a consumer's 528: 526: 370: 193: 102: 82: 836: 747:is antitransitive, so is each subset of 495:is even, or vice-versa. In either case, 1028: 808:Therefore such a preference loop (or 690:An antitransitive relation is always 7: 931:demonstrate that the relation "die 273:For example, consider the relation 1249:. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1150:by left uniqueness, contradicting 650: 603: 580: 533: 419: 372: 365:if this never occurs at all, i.e. 240: 195: 112: 104: 34:Property of mathematical relations 25: 973:that does not conform to perfect 188:This statement is equivalent to 1264:Klimenko, Alexander Y. (2014). 935:rolls a higher number than die 913:, in probabilistic outcomes of 909:Intransitivity can occur under 1355:Properties of binary relations 1068:"Guide to Logic, Relations II" 665: 653: 646: 595: 583: 576: 434: 422: 415: 297:6 (2 is a divisor of 6) and 6 255: 243: 155: 1: 29:Intransitive (disambiguation) 1300:Klimenko, Alexander (2015). 475:is odd, is intransitive. If 305:(see below); for example, 2 986:It has been suggested that 467:on the integers, such that 320:As another example, in the 1371: 904:Occurrences in preferences 463:For example, the relation 452:Many authors use the term 354:In the example above, the 277:on the integers such that 26: 1285:10.1007/s11518-014-5245-x 1039:in fact eat grass – see 736:cannot be the mother of 347:is used to refer to the 1257:Theory and Decision, 24 1166:Bohannan, Brendan J. M. 18:Antitransitive relation 1093:"IntransitiveRelation" 766: 676: 444: 265: 180: 91: 1041:Engel, Cindy (2003). 831:rock, paper, scissors 788:Rock, paper, scissors 763: 677: 445: 351:of antitransitivity. 266: 181: 92: 1128:would hold for some 975:economic rationality 823:equivalence relation 525: 508:knockout tournaments 369: 192: 101: 81: 55:transitive relations 1328:2015Entrp..17.4364K 1190:10.1038/nature00823 1182:2002Natur.418..171K 969:. This may lead to 783:C is preferred to A 780:B is preferred to C 777:A is preferred to B 704:An irreflexive and 49:) is a property of 971:consumer behaviour 767: 672: 670: 440: 261: 176: 87: 45:(sometimes called 1337:10.3390/e17064364 1312:(12): 4364–4412. 1245:Anand, P (1993). 1176:(6894): 171–174. 1154:by irreflexivity. 929:Intransitive dice 894: 893: 814:) is known as an 792:intransitive dice 720:is the mother of 491:are both odd and 349:stronger property 285:is a multiple of 90:{\displaystyle R} 59:stronger property 16:(Redirected from 1362: 1341: 1339: 1321: 1296: 1270: 1250: 1232: 1227: 1221: 1216: 1210: 1209: 1161: 1155: 1149: 1114: 1108: 1107: 1105: 1104: 1095:. Archived from 1089: 1083: 1082: 1080: 1079: 1070:. Archived from 1064: 1058: 1056: 1033: 988:Condorcet voting 961:Analogously, in 948:system of values 919:Condorcet voting 837: 681: 679: 678: 673: 671: 601: 531: 458:antitransitivity 449: 447: 446: 441: 339:Antitransitivity 289:or a divisor of 270: 268: 267: 262: 185: 183: 182: 177: 172: 168: 96: 94: 93: 88: 63:antitransitivity 51:binary relations 21: 1370: 1369: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1345: 1344: 1299: 1268: 1263: 1244: 1241: 1239:Further reading 1236: 1235: 1228: 1224: 1217: 1213: 1163: 1162: 1158: 1141: 1115: 1111: 1102: 1100: 1091: 1090: 1086: 1077: 1075: 1066: 1065: 1061: 1053: 1040: 1034: 1030: 1025: 984: 906: 758: 687: 669: 668: 599: 598: 523: 522: 471:if and only if 367: 366: 343:Often the term 341: 281:if and only if 190: 189: 111: 107: 99: 98: 79: 78: 71: 47:nontransitivity 35: 32: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1368: 1366: 1358: 1357: 1347: 1346: 1343: 1342: 1297: 1279:(2): 128–152. 1261: 1252: 1240: 1237: 1234: 1233: 1222: 1211: 1156: 1109: 1084: 1059: 1051: 1027: 1026: 1024: 1021: 1009: 1008: 1005: 1002: 991:conservative. 983: 980: 979: 978: 959: 940: 926: 923:voting paradox 905: 902: 892: 891: 888: 885: 882: 878: 877: 874: 871: 868: 864: 863: 860: 857: 854: 850: 849: 846: 843: 840: 817: 816:intransitivity 813: 785: 784: 781: 778: 772: 771:intransitivity 757: 754: 753: 752: 743:If a relation 741: 728:the mother of 702: 695: 686: 683: 667: 664: 661: 658: 655: 652: 648: 644: 641: 638: 635: 632: 629: 626: 623: 620: 617: 614: 611: 608: 605: 602: 600: 597: 594: 591: 588: 585: 582: 578: 574: 571: 568: 565: 562: 559: 556: 553: 550: 547: 544: 541: 538: 535: 532: 530: 483:, then either 459: 455: 454:intransitivity 439: 436: 433: 430: 427: 424: 421: 417: 413: 410: 407: 404: 401: 398: 395: 392: 389: 386: 383: 380: 377: 374: 364: 363:antitransitive 361:A relation is 357: 346: 340: 337: 327: 304: 303:antitransitive 260: 257: 254: 251: 248: 245: 242: 239: 236: 233: 230: 227: 224: 221: 218: 215: 212: 209: 206: 203: 200: 197: 175: 171: 167: 164: 161: 157: 153: 150: 147: 144: 141: 138: 135: 132: 129: 126: 123: 120: 117: 114: 110: 106: 86: 76: 70: 69:Intransitivity 67: 43:intransitivity 33: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1367: 1356: 1353: 1352: 1350: 1338: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1320: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1267: 1262: 1260: 1259:(2), 119-145. 1258: 1253: 1248: 1243: 1242: 1238: 1231: 1226: 1223: 1220: 1215: 1212: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1160: 1157: 1153: 1148: 1144: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1113: 1110: 1099:on 2016-03-03 1098: 1094: 1088: 1085: 1074:on 2008-09-16 1073: 1069: 1063: 1060: 1054: 1052:0-618-34068-8 1048: 1044: 1038: 1032: 1029: 1022: 1020: 1018: 1015:on which the 1014: 1006: 1003: 1000: 999: 998: 995: 992: 989: 981: 976: 972: 968: 964: 960: 957: 953: 949: 945: 941: 938: 934: 930: 927: 924: 920: 917:, and in the 916: 912: 911:majority rule 908: 907: 903: 901: 898: 889: 886: 883: 880: 879: 875: 872: 869: 866: 865: 861: 858: 855: 852: 851: 847: 844: 841: 839: 838: 835: 832: 827: 824: 819: 815: 812: 809: 806: 804: 799: 797: 796:Penney's game 793: 789: 782: 779: 776: 775: 774: 770: 762: 755: 750: 746: 742: 739: 735: 731: 727: 723: 719: 716:relation. If 715: 711: 707: 703: 700: 696: 693: 689: 688: 684: 682: 662: 659: 656: 642: 639: 636: 633: 630: 627: 624: 621: 618: 615: 612: 609: 606: 592: 589: 586: 572: 569: 566: 563: 560: 557: 554: 551: 548: 545: 542: 539: 536: 520: 516: 515:transposition 511: 509: 505: 500: 498: 494: 490: 486: 482: 478: 474: 470: 466: 461: 457: 453: 450: 437: 431: 428: 425: 411: 408: 405: 402: 399: 396: 393: 390: 387: 384: 381: 378: 375: 362: 359: 355: 352: 350: 344: 338: 336: 334: 329: 325: 323: 318: 316: 312: 308: 302: 300: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 271: 258: 252: 249: 246: 237: 234: 231: 228: 225: 222: 219: 216: 213: 210: 207: 204: 201: 198: 186: 173: 169: 165: 162: 159: 151: 148: 145: 142: 139: 136: 133: 130: 127: 124: 121: 118: 115: 108: 84: 74: 68: 66: 64: 60: 56: 53:that are not 52: 48: 44: 40: 30: 19: 1309: 1305: 1276: 1272: 1256: 1246: 1225: 1214: 1173: 1169: 1159: 1151: 1146: 1142: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1112: 1101:. Retrieved 1097:the original 1087: 1076:. Retrieved 1072:the original 1062: 1042: 1036: 1031: 1010: 996: 993: 985: 936: 932: 899: 895: 829:The game of 828: 820: 807: 800: 786: 768: 748: 744: 737: 733: 729: 725: 721: 717: 713: 518: 512: 506:relation in 503: 501: 496: 492: 488: 484: 480: 476: 472: 468: 464: 462: 451: 360: 353: 345:intransitive 342: 330: 319: 317:12 as well. 314: 310: 306: 298: 294: 290: 286: 282: 278: 274: 272: 187: 75:intransitive 72: 62: 46: 42: 36: 967:preferences 952:preferences 915:game theory 803:irreflexive 692:irreflexive 333:freemasonry 39:mathematics 1319:1507.03169 1103:2006-07-13 1078:2006-07-13 1023:References 982:Likelihood 944:psychology 685:Properties 322:food chain 313:12, and 2 1017:consensus 997:Such as: 963:economics 867:scissors 769:The term 651:¬ 647:⟹ 634:∧ 604:∀ 581:¬ 577:⟹ 564:∧ 534:∀ 499:is even. 420:¬ 416:⟹ 403:∧ 373:∀ 241:¬ 238:∧ 226:∧ 196:∃ 156:⟹ 143:∧ 113:∀ 105:¬ 1349:Category 1293:59390606 1198:12110887 845:scissors 504:defeated 456:to mean 1324:Bibcode 1306:Entropy 1206:4348391 1178:Bibcode 1140:, then 1035:Wolves 732:, then 356:feed on 326:feed on 1291:  1204:  1196:  1170:Nature 1124:, and 1049:  1013:vector 956:tastes 881:paper 848:paper 794:; and 756:Cycles 724:, and 714:mother 710:right- 699:connex 1314:arXiv 1289:S2CID 1269:(PDF) 1202:S2CID 954:, or 853:rock 811:cycle 706:left- 497:a + c 481:b R c 477:a R b 473:a + b 469:a R b 309:6, 6 279:a R b 1194:PMID 1047:ISBN 950:(or 842:rock 708:(or 487:and 479:and 1332:doi 1281:doi 1186:doi 1174:418 1152:aRb 1126:aRc 1122:bRc 1118:aRb 1116:If 942:In 513:By 61:of 37:In 1351:: 1330:. 1322:. 1310:17 1308:. 1304:. 1287:. 1277:23 1275:. 1271:. 1200:. 1192:. 1184:. 1172:. 1145:= 1136:, 1132:, 1120:, 1037:do 925:). 890:0 876:1 862:0 818:. 790:; 765:1. 521:: 460:. 97:) 41:, 1340:. 1334:: 1326:: 1316:: 1295:. 1283:: 1251:. 1208:. 1188:: 1180:: 1147:b 1143:a 1138:c 1134:b 1130:a 1106:. 1081:. 1057:. 1055:. 937:Y 933:X 887:0 884:1 873:0 870:0 859:1 856:0 751:. 749:R 745:R 740:. 738:C 734:A 730:C 726:B 722:B 718:A 694:. 666:) 663:b 660:R 657:a 654:( 643:c 640:R 637:b 631:c 628:R 625:a 622:: 619:c 616:, 613:b 610:, 607:a 596:) 593:c 590:R 587:b 584:( 573:c 570:R 567:a 561:b 558:R 555:a 552:: 549:c 546:, 543:b 540:, 537:a 519:R 493:b 489:c 485:a 465:R 438:. 435:) 432:c 429:R 426:a 423:( 412:c 409:R 406:b 400:b 397:R 394:a 391:: 388:c 385:, 382:b 379:, 376:a 315:R 311:R 307:R 299:R 295:R 291:b 287:b 283:a 275:R 259:. 256:) 253:c 250:R 247:a 244:( 235:c 232:R 229:b 223:b 220:R 217:a 214:: 211:c 208:, 205:b 202:, 199:a 174:. 170:) 166:c 163:R 160:a 152:c 149:R 146:b 140:b 137:R 134:a 131:: 128:c 125:, 122:b 119:, 116:a 109:( 85:R 31:. 20:)

Index

Antitransitive relation
Intransitive (disambiguation)
mathematics
binary relations
transitive relations
stronger property
food chain
freemasonry
stronger property
knockout tournaments
transposition
irreflexive
connex
left-
right-
Cycle diagram
Rock, paper, scissors
intransitive dice
Penney's game
irreflexive
cycle
equivalence relation
rock, paper, scissors
majority rule
game theory
Condorcet voting
voting paradox
Intransitive dice
psychology
system of values

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.