Knowledge (XXG)

Argument from ignorance

Source πŸ“

31: 1727: 70:
entitled to conclude, solely on that basis, that it is true. Another way of expressing this is that a proposition is true only if proven true, and a proposition is false only if proven false. If no proof is offered (in either direction), then the proposition can be called unproven, undecided, inconclusive, an open problem or a conjecture. In debates, appealing to ignorance is sometimes an attempt to shift the
260: 69:
is true because it has not yet been proven false or a proposition is false because it has not yet been proven true. If a proposition has not yet been proven true, one is not entitled to conclude, solely on that basis, that it is false, and if a proposition has not yet been proven false, one is not
180:
is a logically valid rule of inference that allows the creation of a new proposition from the negation and reordering of an existing one. The method applies to any proposition of the type "If A then B" and says that negating all the variables and switching them back to front leads to a new
98:
This example clearly states what appeal to ignorance is: "Although we have proven that the moon is not made of spare ribs, we have not proven that its core cannot be filled with them; therefore, the moon's core is filled with spare
87:"I take the view that this lack (of enemy subversive activity in the west coast) is the most ominous sign in our whole situation. It convinces me more than perhaps any other factor that the sabotage we are to get, the 329:
Though the authors here caution that this may not be an entirely appropriate use of the argument as the onus of providing proof for a substantive statement, like "there are WMDs in Iraq",
493: 844: 849: 181:
proposition i.e. "If Not-B then Not-A" that is just as true as the original one and that the first implies the second and the second implies the first.
161:
There may be seventy kazillion other worlds, but not one is known to have the moral advancement of the Earth, so we're still central to the Universe.
157:
There is no compelling evidence that UFOs are not visiting the Earth; therefore, UFOs exist, and there is intelligent life elsewhere in the Universe.
110: 501: 1761: 639: 1227: 884: 726: 91:
activities are to get, are timed just like Pearl Harbor ... I believe we are just being lulled into a false sense of security." –
590: 413: 177: 106: 527: 1038: 388: 363: 118:"Simply because you do not have evidence that something exists does not mean that you have evidence that it doesn't exist." 1646: 854: 1751: 1682: 1658: 1247: 1259: 1003: 71: 206:. A search for water on the ground may yield a null result (the ground is dry); therefore, it probably did not rain. 1269: 1677: 1234: 1130: 163:) This impatience with ambiguity can be criticized in the phrase: absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. 1672: 1512: 980: 816: 772: 467: 1692: 1507: 1023: 719: 545: 303: 248:
is probably not fallacious and depends entirely on the truth of the first premise (the ability to know it).
143: 95:, then California's Attorney General (before a congressional hearing in San Francisco on 21 February 1942). 1614: 1604: 1554: 1528: 1304: 1178: 1145: 1046: 1028: 928: 777: 759: 578: 291: 1652: 1640: 1620: 1609: 1524: 1337: 1313: 1135: 1091: 943: 869: 782: 273: 184: 276: β€“ Argument based on the absence of statements in historical documents, rather than their presence 1667: 1571: 1535: 1450: 1406: 1242: 1173: 963: 792: 767: 128: 1545: 1444: 1391: 1367: 1290: 1193: 1125: 1051: 864: 859: 836: 811: 330: 309: 279: 220: 202: 1756: 1730: 1663: 1477: 1362: 1347: 1294: 1254: 1203: 1140: 1099: 1076: 1056: 959: 803: 787: 712: 609: 463: 30: 1549: 1386: 1376: 1352: 1329: 1285: 1211: 1163: 1121: 1081: 923: 918: 740: 680: 635: 596: 586: 419: 409: 384: 359: 285: 265: 1699: 1540: 1439: 1381: 1319: 1114: 993: 988: 973: 938: 898: 826: 821: 670: 662: 297: 232:
If Q were false then I would know it; in fact I do not know it; therefore Q cannot be false.
62: 1420: 1396: 1216: 1188: 1168: 1016: 984: 968: 229:
If P were true then I would know it; in fact I do not know it; therefore P cannot be true.
102: 1456: 933: 438: 155:: the claim that whatever has not been proved false must be true, and vice versa. (e.g., 17: 1357: 1342: 1264: 1183: 1109: 749: 675: 650: 44: 236:
In practice these arguments are often unsound and rely on the truth of the supporting
1745: 1482: 1372: 1104: 1067: 1011: 879: 874: 1494: 913: 88: 629: 1687: 1464: 1401: 574: 196: 187:
is exactly the same thing as Contraposition, described in a different language.
92: 66: 1597: 1591: 1518: 1430: 541: 255: 138: 75: 34: 666: 600: 494:"You look but do not find: why the absence of evidence can be a useful thing" 1704: 1488: 1472: 1155: 698: 523: 423: 243: 132: 1634: 704: 684: 1582: 124: 736: 237: 29: 109:, argued against the argument from ignorance when discussing the 708: 383:(11th ed.). Boston, Mass.: Cengage Learning. p. 140. 408:. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press. 282: β€“ General rule rejecting claims made without evidence 358:(14th ed.). Routledge Publication. p. 146. 1581: 1569: 1428: 1419: 1328: 1303: 1278: 1202: 1154: 1090: 1065: 1037: 1002: 952: 906: 897: 835: 801: 757: 748: 544:. "Chapter 12: The Fine Art of Baloney Detection". 65:. The fallacy is committed when one asserts that a 528:"Logical Fallacies Bootcamp: Appeal to Ignorance" 651:"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" 404:Hansen, Hans V.; Pinto, Robert C., eds. (1995). 294: β€“ Labelling real experiences as delusional 61:represents "a lack of contrary evidence"), is a 300: β€“ Philosophical problem-solving principle 150: 116: 845:Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise 567:Fallacies: classical and contemporary readings 406:Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings 850:Negative conclusion from affirmative premises 720: 8: 649:Alton, Douglas G.; Bland, J. Martin (1995). 492:Brown, Deborah; Key, Brian (22 April 2019). 200:is a term often used in science to indicate 74:. The term was likely coined by philosopher 312: β€“ Analogy devised by Bertrand Russell 225:Arguments from self-knowing take the form: 1578: 1425: 1300: 903: 754: 727: 713: 705: 674: 610:"Nonfallacious Arguments From Ignorance" 634:. Pennsylvania State University Press. 443:An Essay Concerning Human Understanding 346: 322: 288: β€“ List of faulty argument types 7: 331:lies with the party making the claim 565:Hansen, Hans V.; Pinto, Robert C. 439:"Book IV, Chapter XVII: Of Reason" 25: 111:lack of evidence for WMDs in Iraq 1726: 1725: 701:– article on Appeal to Ignorance 617:American Philosophical Quarterly 306: β€“ Risk management strategy 258: 173:Contraposition and transposition 381:A Concise Introduction to Logic 131:". The usefulness of this as a 1223:Correlation implies causation 240:. For example, the claim that 1: 1762:Barriers to critical thinking 333:, not with those opposing it. 585:(14th ed.). Routledge. 242:If I had just sat on a wild 472:www.LogicallyFallacious.com 78:in the late 17th century. 1778: 1647:I'm entitled to my opinion 379:Hurley, Patrick J (2012). 218: 215:Argument from self-knowing 1721: 1630: 1503: 468:"Argument from Ignorance" 63:fallacy in informal logic 50:argumentum ad ignorantiam 18:Argumentum ad ignorantiam 1673:Motte-and-bailey fallacy 773:Affirming the consequent 667:10.1136/bmj.311.7003.485 631:Arguments from Ignorance 1693:Two wrongs make a right 1024:Denying the correlative 547:The Demon-Haunted World 354:Copi, Irving M (2016). 304:Precautionary principle 144:The Demon-Haunted World 107:US Secretary of Defense 41:Argument from ignorance 1678:Psychologist's fallacy 1615:Argument to moderation 1605:Argument from anecdote 1555:Chronological snobbery 1179:Quoting out of context 1146:Overwhelming exception 1029:Suppressed correlative 929:Quoting out of context 804:quantificational logic 778:Denying the antecedent 292:Martha Mitchell effect 165: 120: 113:prior to the invasion: 48: 37: 1641:The Four Great Errors 1621:Argumentum ad populum 1610:Argument from silence 1314:Argumentum ad baculum 1092:Faulty generalization 783:Argument from fallacy 583:Introduction to Logic 356:Introduction to logic 274:Argument from silence 141:explains in his book 33: 1659:Invincible ignorance 1465:Reductio ad Stalinum 1451:Reductio ad Hitlerum 1407:Wisdom of repugnance 1174:Moving the goalposts 1039:Illicit transference 964:Begging the question 885:Undistributed middle 793:Mathematical fallacy 768:Affirming a disjunct 437:Locke, John (1690). 246:then I would know it 135:may vary by context. 129:No news is good news 1752:Relevance fallacies 1392:Parade of horribles 1368:In-group favoritism 1194:Syntactic ambiguity 837:Syllogistic fallacy 760:propositional logic 628:Walton, D. (2010). 608:Walton, D. (1992). 221:Autoepistemic logic 203:evidence of absence 153:Appeal to ignorance 55:appeal to ignorance 1478:Poisoning the well 1295:Proof by assertion 1270:Texas sharpshooter 1204:Questionable cause 1141:Slothful induction 1100:Anecdotal evidence 960:Circular reasoning 855:Exclusive premises 817:Illicit conversion 38: 1739: 1738: 1717: 1716: 1713: 1712: 1653:Ignoratio elenchi 1565: 1564: 1415: 1414: 1377:Not invented here 1082:Converse accident 1004:Correlative-based 981:Compound question 924:False attribution 919:False equivalence 893: 892: 641:978-0-271-04196-4 286:List of fallacies 266:Philosophy portal 210:Related arguments 53:), also known as 16:(Redirected from 1769: 1729: 1728: 1700:Special pleading 1579: 1440:Appeal to motive 1426: 1402:Stirring symbols 1382:Island mentality 1320:Wishful thinking 1301: 1017:Perfect solution 994:No true Scotsman 989:Complex question 974:Leading question 953:Question-begging 939:No true Scotsman 904: 827:Quantifier shift 822:Proof by example 755: 729: 722: 715: 706: 688: 678: 645: 624: 614: 604: 570: 552: 551: 538: 532: 531: 520: 514: 513: 511: 509: 500:. Archived from 498:The Conversation 489: 483: 482: 480: 478: 460: 454: 453: 451: 449: 434: 428: 427: 401: 395: 394: 376: 370: 369: 351: 334: 327: 310:Russell's teapot 280:Hitchens's razor 268: 263: 262: 261: 27:Informal fallacy 21: 1777: 1776: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1735: 1709: 1683:Rationalization 1626: 1573: 1561: 1499: 1421:Genetic fallacy 1411: 1324: 1299: 1274: 1198: 1189:Sorites paradox 1169:False precision 1150: 1131:Double counting 1086: 1061: 1033: 998: 985:Loaded question 969:Loaded language 948: 889: 831: 797: 744: 733: 695: 648: 642: 627: 612: 607: 593: 573: 564: 561: 559:Further reading 556: 555: 540: 539: 535: 522: 521: 517: 507: 505: 504:on 15 June 2021 491: 490: 486: 476: 474: 462: 461: 457: 447: 445: 436: 435: 431: 416: 403: 402: 398: 391: 378: 377: 373: 366: 353: 352: 348: 343: 338: 337: 328: 324: 319: 264: 259: 257: 254: 223: 217: 212: 193: 175: 170: 103:Donald Rumsfeld 84: 72:burden of proof 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1775: 1773: 1765: 1764: 1759: 1754: 1744: 1743: 1737: 1736: 1734: 1733: 1722: 1719: 1718: 1715: 1714: 1711: 1710: 1708: 1707: 1702: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1685: 1680: 1675: 1670: 1661: 1656: 1649: 1644: 1637: 1631: 1628: 1627: 1625: 1624: 1617: 1612: 1607: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1587: 1585: 1576: 1567: 1566: 1563: 1562: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1543: 1538: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1522: 1515: 1513:Accomplishment 1504: 1501: 1500: 1498: 1497: 1492: 1485: 1480: 1475: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1442: 1436: 1434: 1423: 1417: 1416: 1413: 1412: 1410: 1409: 1404: 1399: 1394: 1389: 1384: 1379: 1370: 1365: 1360: 1355: 1350: 1345: 1340: 1334: 1332: 1326: 1325: 1323: 1322: 1317: 1309: 1307: 1298: 1297: 1288: 1282: 1280: 1276: 1275: 1273: 1272: 1267: 1265:Slippery slope 1262: 1257: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1231: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1208: 1206: 1200: 1199: 1197: 1196: 1191: 1186: 1184:Slippery slope 1181: 1176: 1171: 1166: 1160: 1158: 1152: 1151: 1149: 1148: 1143: 1138: 1133: 1128: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1112: 1110:Cherry picking 1102: 1096: 1094: 1088: 1087: 1085: 1084: 1079: 1073: 1071: 1063: 1062: 1060: 1059: 1054: 1049: 1043: 1041: 1035: 1034: 1032: 1031: 1026: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1008: 1006: 1000: 999: 997: 996: 991: 978: 977: 976: 966: 956: 954: 950: 949: 947: 946: 941: 936: 931: 926: 921: 916: 910: 908: 901: 895: 894: 891: 890: 888: 887: 882: 877: 872: 867: 862: 857: 852: 847: 841: 839: 833: 832: 830: 829: 824: 819: 814: 808: 806: 799: 798: 796: 795: 790: 785: 780: 775: 770: 764: 762: 752: 746: 745: 734: 732: 731: 724: 717: 709: 703: 702: 694: 693:External links 691: 690: 689: 646: 640: 625: 605: 592:978-0205820375 591: 575:Copi, Irving M 571: 560: 557: 554: 553: 533: 515: 484: 455: 429: 415:978-0271014166 414: 396: 389: 371: 364: 345: 344: 342: 339: 336: 335: 321: 320: 318: 315: 314: 313: 307: 301: 295: 289: 283: 277: 270: 269: 253: 250: 234: 233: 230: 216: 213: 211: 208: 192: 189: 178:Contraposition 174: 171: 169: 166: 149: 148: 136: 115: 114: 100: 96: 83: 80: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1774: 1763: 1760: 1758: 1755: 1753: 1750: 1749: 1747: 1732: 1724: 1723: 1720: 1706: 1703: 1701: 1698: 1694: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1686: 1684: 1681: 1679: 1676: 1674: 1671: 1669: 1665: 1662: 1660: 1657: 1655: 1654: 1650: 1648: 1645: 1643: 1642: 1638: 1636: 1633: 1632: 1629: 1623: 1622: 1618: 1616: 1613: 1611: 1608: 1606: 1603: 1599: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1589: 1588: 1586: 1584: 1580: 1577: 1575: 1568: 1556: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1547: 1544: 1542: 1539: 1537: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1523: 1521: 1520: 1516: 1514: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1506: 1505: 1502: 1496: 1493: 1491: 1490: 1486: 1484: 1481: 1479: 1476: 1474: 1471: 1467: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1443: 1441: 1438: 1437: 1435: 1433: 1432: 1427: 1424: 1422: 1418: 1408: 1405: 1403: 1400: 1398: 1395: 1393: 1390: 1388: 1385: 1383: 1380: 1378: 1374: 1373:Invented here 1371: 1369: 1366: 1364: 1361: 1359: 1356: 1354: 1351: 1349: 1346: 1344: 1341: 1339: 1336: 1335: 1333: 1331: 1327: 1321: 1318: 1316: 1315: 1311: 1310: 1308: 1306: 1302: 1296: 1292: 1289: 1287: 1284: 1283: 1281: 1277: 1271: 1268: 1266: 1263: 1261: 1258: 1256: 1253: 1249: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1241: 1237: 1236: 1232: 1230: 1229: 1225: 1224: 1222: 1218: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1210: 1209: 1207: 1205: 1201: 1195: 1192: 1190: 1187: 1185: 1182: 1180: 1177: 1175: 1172: 1170: 1167: 1165: 1162: 1161: 1159: 1157: 1153: 1147: 1144: 1142: 1139: 1137: 1136:False analogy 1134: 1132: 1129: 1127: 1123: 1120: 1116: 1113: 1111: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105:Sampling bias 1103: 1101: 1098: 1097: 1095: 1093: 1089: 1083: 1080: 1078: 1075: 1074: 1072: 1070: 1069: 1068:Secundum quid 1064: 1058: 1055: 1053: 1050: 1048: 1045: 1044: 1042: 1040: 1036: 1030: 1027: 1025: 1022: 1018: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012:False dilemma 1010: 1009: 1007: 1005: 1001: 995: 992: 990: 986: 982: 979: 975: 972: 971: 970: 967: 965: 961: 958: 957: 955: 951: 945: 942: 940: 937: 935: 932: 930: 927: 925: 922: 920: 917: 915: 912: 911: 909: 905: 902: 900: 896: 886: 883: 881: 880:Illicit minor 878: 876: 875:Illicit major 873: 871: 868: 866: 863: 861: 858: 856: 853: 851: 848: 846: 843: 842: 840: 838: 834: 828: 825: 823: 820: 818: 815: 813: 810: 809: 807: 805: 800: 794: 791: 789: 786: 784: 781: 779: 776: 774: 771: 769: 766: 765: 763: 761: 756: 753: 751: 747: 742: 738: 730: 725: 723: 718: 716: 711: 710: 707: 700: 699:Fallacy Files 697: 696: 692: 686: 682: 677: 672: 668: 664: 661:(7003): 485. 660: 656: 652: 647: 643: 637: 633: 632: 626: 623:(4): 381–387. 622: 618: 611: 606: 602: 598: 594: 588: 584: 580: 576: 572: 568: 563: 562: 558: 549: 548: 543: 537: 534: 529: 525: 519: 516: 503: 499: 495: 488: 485: 473: 469: 465: 459: 456: 444: 440: 433: 430: 425: 421: 417: 411: 407: 400: 397: 392: 390:9780840034175 386: 382: 375: 372: 367: 365:9780205820375 361: 357: 350: 347: 340: 332: 326: 323: 316: 311: 308: 305: 302: 299: 298:Occam's razor 296: 293: 290: 287: 284: 281: 278: 275: 272: 271: 267: 256: 251: 249: 247: 245: 239: 231: 228: 227: 226: 222: 214: 209: 207: 205: 204: 199: 198: 190: 188: 186: 185:Transposition 182: 179: 172: 168:Related terms 167: 164: 162: 158: 154: 146: 145: 140: 137: 134: 130: 126: 122: 121: 119: 112: 108: 104: 101: 97: 94: 90: 86: 85: 81: 79: 77: 73: 68: 64: 60: 56: 52: 51: 46: 42: 36: 32: 19: 1668:Naturalistic 1651: 1639: 1619: 1590: 1574:of relevance 1517: 1495:Whataboutism 1487: 1463: 1457:Godwin's law 1449: 1429: 1312: 1305:Consequences 1286:Law/Legality 1260:Single cause 1233: 1226: 1066: 934:Loki's Wager 914:Equivocation 907:Equivocation 658: 654: 630: 620: 616: 582: 566: 546: 536: 518: 506:. Retrieved 502:the original 497: 487: 475:. Retrieved 471: 458: 446:. Retrieved 442: 432: 405: 399: 380: 374: 355: 349: 325: 241: 235: 224: 201: 195: 194: 183: 176: 160: 156: 152: 151: 142: 117: 89:Fifth Column 58: 54: 49: 40: 39: 1688:Red herring 1445:Association 1126:Conjunction 1047:Composition 944:Reification 860:Existential 812:Existential 579:Cohen, Carl 542:Sagan, Carl 477:23 November 464:Bennett, Bo 197:Null result 191:Null result 93:Earl Warren 67:proposition 1746:Categories 1664:Moralistic 1598:Sealioning 1592:Ad nauseam 1519:Ipse dixit 1431:Ad hominem 1255:Regression 1057:Ecological 870:Four terms 788:Masked man 341:References 219:See also: 139:Carl Sagan 76:John Locke 57:(in which 35:John Locke 1757:Ignorance 1705:Straw man 1583:Arguments 1572:fallacies 1546:Tradition 1536:Etymology 1508:Authority 1489:Tu quoque 1473:Bulverism 1243:Gambler's 1212:Animistic 1156:Ambiguity 1122:Base rate 865:Necessity 737:fallacies 601:862726425 524:Daily Kos 244:porcupine 133:heuristic 59:ignorance 1731:Category 1363:Ridicule 1348:Flattery 1338:Children 1235:Post hoc 1115:McNamara 1077:Accident 1052:Division 899:Informal 581:(2010). 448:12 March 424:30624864 252:See also 125:aphorism 82:Examples 1550:Novelty 1525:Poverty 1387:Loyalty 1353:Novelty 1330:Emotion 1279:Appeals 1248:Inverse 1228:Cum hoc 1217:Furtive 735:Common 685:7647644 676:2550545 508:20 June 238:premise 105:, then 1635:ClichΓ© 1570:Other 1541:Nature 1529:Wealth 1164:Accent 750:Formal 683:  673:  638:  599:  589:  422:  412:  387:  362:  99:ribs." 43:(from 1397:Spite 1291:Stone 613:(PDF) 317:Notes 45:Latin 1483:Tone 1358:Pity 1343:Fear 741:list 681:PMID 636:ISBN 597:OCLC 587:ISBN 510:2022 479:2016 450:2015 420:OCLC 410:ISBN 385:ISBN 360:ISBN 159:Or: 123:The 802:In 758:In 671:PMC 663:doi 659:311 655:BMJ 1748:: 1666:/ 1548:/ 1527:/ 1375:/ 1293:/ 1124:/ 987:/ 983:/ 962:/ 679:. 669:. 657:. 653:. 621:29 619:. 615:. 595:. 577:; 526:. 496:. 470:. 466:. 441:. 418:. 47:: 743:) 739:( 728:e 721:t 714:v 687:. 665:: 644:. 603:. 569:. 550:. 530:. 512:. 481:. 452:. 426:. 393:. 368:. 147:: 127:" 20:)

Index

Argumentum ad ignorantiam

John Locke
Latin
fallacy in informal logic
proposition
burden of proof
John Locke
Fifth Column
Earl Warren
Donald Rumsfeld
US Secretary of Defense
lack of evidence for WMDs in Iraq
aphorism
No news is good news
heuristic
Carl Sagan
The Demon-Haunted World
Contraposition
Transposition
Null result
evidence of absence
Autoepistemic logic
premise
porcupine
Philosophy portal
Argument from silence
Hitchens's razor
List of fallacies
Martha Mitchell effect

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑