Knowledge (XXG)

Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority

Source 📝

367:, looked closely at the specifics of the financing of the parking garage and the building plan's dependence on retail rental income to determine that the Eagle Coffee Shoppe was integral to the government purpose of building and financing a parking garage. Also, a close symbiosis was noted between retail businesses having nearby parking and a garage being close to shopping opportunities to the point that they were a "joint participant." Based on the close interplay between the government and the company, the court found that the exclusion of black customers was a violation even though no government agency was directly discriminating: "the exclusion of appellant under the circumstances shown to be present here was discriminatory state action in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment." 37: 272: 450: 350:
No keeper of an inn, tavern, hotel, or restaurant, or other place of public entertainment or refreshment of travelers, guests, or customers shall be obliged, by law, to furnish entertainment or refreshment to persons whose reception or entertainment by him would be offensive to the major part of his
299:
on the downtown block in Wilmington between 8th, Orange, 9th, and Shipley Streets. The city's economic analysis showed that the bonds could be repaid only if the parking income was augmented with rental income from a strip of storefronts built along 9th Street. The Eagle Coffee Shoppe, Inc., was one
118:
In view of all the circumstances of this case, including the facts that the restaurant was physically and financially an integral part of a public building, built and maintained with public funds, devoted to a public parking service, and owned and operated by an agency of the State for public
374:
concurred with the verdict but felt that since no evidence had been submitted that Burton had bothered other customers, the Delaware law allowing restaurants to exclude customers was a pretense to allow racial discrimination and so was itself unconstitutional. In dissent, Justice
333:
by claiming that the discrimination was sanctioned by the state by virtue of the landlord and the close relationship between the business and state agency. The lawsuit sought to force the Eagle Coffee Shoppe to integrate its dining room or to terminate its lease.
321:, became involved in the dispute. Rather than appeal those arrests, he had City Councilman William H. Burton park at the garage and then go to the Eagle Coffee Shoppe, where he was refused service explicitly because he was an African American. 395:
The case broadened the reach of the Equal Protection Clause to include not only direct government action but also actions by private companies acting in close relationship to a government agency. The impact of the ruling was later limited in
345:
overruled that decision found that Eagle Coffee Shoppe's refusal to serve black clientele was legal because of a state law, 24 Del.C. § 1501, which allowed restaurants to refuse service if a person was disturbing other customers.
456: 932: 237: 119:
purposes, the State was a joint participant in the operation of the restaurant, and its refusal to serve appellant violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
819: 791: 437: 409: 78: 942: 937: 957: 774: 501: 625: 967: 927: 584: 972: 947: 400:
to situations in which the government support of the business was substantial before private discrimination could be considered a "state action."
546: 758: 485: 41: 952: 630: 383:, found the state court ruling so ambiguous that they preferred to return the case to the lower court for clarification. Justice 166: 666: 894: 515: 962: 259:
applies to private business that operates in a relationship to a government that is close to the point that it becomes a "
519: 280: 28: 839: 317: 252: 311:
at the counter and refused to leave until they were served in an unsuccessful attempt to desegregate the restaurant.
341:
ruled that the government lease to a discriminating company was a violation of Burton's civil rights. However, the
338: 599: 380: 376: 256: 178: 875: 342: 174: 106: 295:
for initial construction. The first project of the new agency was to build the Midtown Parking Center, a
823: 795: 441: 296: 271: 70: 288: 857: 750: 768: 635: 495: 154: 866: 754: 744: 481: 384: 287:
in 1951 to encourage parking access. Although a state agency, the WPA worked closely with the
284: 150: 24: 471: 848: 312: 304: 292: 830: 798: 444: 371: 186: 921: 740: 387:
wrote a separate dissent that also called for returning the case to the state court.
662: 364: 162: 329:
A suit was filed in 1958 on Burton's behalf against the parking authority and the
73: 523: 330: 260: 134: 142: 89: 626:"Local legal historic sites – Midtown Parking Center and Eagle Coffee Shoppe" 561: 548: 85: 275:
Former location of restaurant, on far end, just prior to garage demolition
477: 884: 657: 308: 60:
William H. Burton, Appellant, v. Wilmington Parking Authority, et al.
270: 355:
Redding then appealed to the federal courts on behalf of Burton.
36: 457:
public domain material from this U.S government document
307:
workers were arrested for trespass when they staged a
933:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court
410:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 365
315:, a local civil rights attorney who helped litigate 730:, 365 U.S. at 727-28 (Frankfurter, J., dissenting). 300:of the tenants and signed a 20-year lease in 1957. 231: 223: 215: 207: 199: 194: 123: 112: 102: 97: 65: 55: 48: 23: 682:, 365 U.S. at 717, n.1 (quoting 24 Del.C. § 1501). 283:(WPA) is a government agency established by the 203:Clark, joined by Warren, Black, Douglas, Brennan 706:, 365 U.S. at 726-27 (Stewart, J., concurring). 348: 718:, 365 U.S. at 728-30 (Harlan, J., dissenting). 8: 943:United States racial desegregation case law 773:: CS1 maint: location missing publisher ( 500:: CS1 maint: location missing publisher ( 20: 429: 427: 425: 363:The majority opinion, written by Justice 351:customers, and would injure his business. 473:Equality, Affirmative Action and Justice 938:United States equal protection case law 421: 958:Garages (parking) in the United States 816:Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority 766: 658:Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority 624:Lindenmuth, Janet (February 8, 2012). 493: 434:Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority 248:Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority 303:Shortly after it opened, seven black 18:1961 United States Supreme Court case 7: 968:African-American history of Delaware 583:Williams, Leonard L. (Summer 1998). 669: (last visited June 23, 2018). 42:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 928:United States Supreme Court cases 895:"Basic Equal Protection Analysis" 893:Galloway Jr., Russell W. (1989). 826:715 (1961) is available from: 448: 35: 973:Civil rights movement case law 948:1961 in United States case law 1: 251:, 365 U.S. 715 (1961), was a 788:Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis 520:Wilmington Parking Authority 398:Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis 281:Wilmington Parking Authority 29:Wilmington Parking Authority 667:Chicago–Kent College of Law 318:Brown v. Board of Education 255:case that decided that the 253:United States Supreme Court 227:Harlan, joined by Whittaker 989: 885:Oyez (oral argument audio) 455:This article incorporates 339:Delaware Court of Chancery 236: 128: 117: 34: 656: 291:, which would issue the 49:Argued February 21, 1961 953:Delaware state case law 257:Equal Protection Clause 899:Santa Clara Law Review 746:Collected Legal Essays 353: 343:Delaware Supreme Court 276: 175:William J. Brennan Jr. 107:Delaware Supreme Court 51:Decided April 17, 1961 631:Delaware Library Blog 274: 963:Wilmington, Delaware 470:Rabe, Johan (2001). 238:Fourteenth Amendment 179:Charles E. Whittaker 876:Library of Congress 751:Littleton, Colorado 598:(2). Archived from 562:39.7450°N 75.5496°W 558: /  240:, the Delaware Code 694:, 365 U.S. at 717. 636:Widener University 605:on October 5, 2013 585:"Louis L. Redding" 526:on October 5, 2013 391:Legal consequences 289:City of Wilmington 277: 155:William O. Douglas 139:Associate Justices 567:39.7450; -75.5496 385:Felix Frankfurter 381:Charles Whittaker 285:State of Delaware 244: 243: 167:John M. Harlan II 151:Felix Frankfurter 84:81 S. Ct. 856; 6 980: 914: 912: 910: 889: 883: 880: 874: 871: 865: 862: 856: 853: 847: 844: 838: 835: 829: 802: 785: 779: 778: 772: 764: 741:Bittker, Boris I 737: 731: 725: 719: 713: 707: 701: 695: 689: 683: 677: 671: 670: 660: 653: 647: 646: 644: 642: 621: 615: 614: 612: 610: 604: 589: 580: 574: 573: 572: 570: 569: 568: 563: 559: 556: 555: 554: 551: 542: 536: 535: 533: 531: 522:. Archived from 512: 506: 505: 499: 491: 467: 461: 452: 451: 431: 325:Prior litigation 313:Louis L. Redding 124:Court membership 39: 38: 21: 988: 987: 983: 982: 981: 979: 978: 977: 918: 917: 908: 906: 892: 887: 881: 878: 872: 869: 863: 860: 854: 851: 845: 842: 836: 833: 827: 811: 806: 805: 786: 782: 765: 761: 753:. p. 202. 739: 738: 734: 726: 722: 714: 710: 702: 698: 690: 686: 678: 674: 655: 654: 650: 640: 638: 623: 622: 618: 608: 606: 602: 592:Delaware Lawyer 587: 582: 581: 577: 566: 564: 560: 557: 552: 549: 547: 545: 544: 543: 539: 529: 527: 514: 513: 509: 492: 488: 469: 468: 464: 449: 432: 423: 418: 406: 393: 361: 327: 269: 177: 165: 153: 93: 50: 44: 19: 12: 11: 5: 986: 984: 976: 975: 970: 965: 960: 955: 950: 945: 940: 935: 930: 920: 919: 916: 915: 890: 858:Google Scholar 810: 809:External links 807: 804: 803: 780: 760:978-0837703589 759: 732: 720: 708: 696: 684: 672: 648: 616: 575: 537: 507: 487:978-3831128327 486: 480:. p. 69. 462: 420: 419: 417: 414: 413: 412: 405: 402: 392: 389: 377:John Harlan II 372:Potter Stewart 360: 357: 326: 323: 305:local Chrysler 268: 265: 242: 241: 234: 233: 229: 228: 225: 221: 220: 217: 213: 212: 209: 205: 204: 201: 197: 196: 192: 191: 190: 189: 187:Potter Stewart 140: 137: 132: 126: 125: 121: 120: 115: 114: 110: 109: 104: 100: 99: 95: 94: 83: 67: 63: 62: 57: 56:Full case name 53: 52: 46: 45: 40: 32: 31: 17: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 985: 974: 971: 969: 966: 964: 961: 959: 956: 954: 951: 949: 946: 944: 941: 939: 936: 934: 931: 929: 926: 925: 923: 904: 900: 896: 891: 886: 877: 868: 859: 850: 841: 840:CourtListener 832: 825: 821: 817: 813: 812: 808: 800: 797: 793: 789: 784: 781: 776: 770: 762: 756: 752: 748: 747: 742: 736: 733: 729: 724: 721: 717: 712: 709: 705: 700: 697: 693: 688: 685: 681: 676: 673: 668: 664: 659: 652: 649: 637: 633: 632: 627: 620: 617: 601: 597: 593: 586: 579: 576: 571: 541: 538: 525: 521: 517: 511: 508: 503: 497: 489: 483: 479: 475: 474: 466: 463: 460: 458: 447: (1961). 446: 443: 439: 435: 430: 428: 426: 422: 415: 411: 408: 407: 403: 401: 399: 390: 388: 386: 382: 378: 373: 368: 366: 358: 356: 352: 347: 344: 340: 335: 332: 324: 322: 320: 319: 314: 310: 306: 301: 298: 294: 290: 286: 282: 273: 266: 264: 262: 258: 254: 250: 249: 239: 235: 230: 226: 222: 218: 214: 210: 206: 202: 198: 195:Case opinions 193: 188: 184: 180: 176: 172: 168: 164: 160: 156: 152: 148: 144: 141: 138: 136: 133: 131:Chief Justice 130: 129: 127: 122: 116: 111: 108: 105: 101: 96: 91: 87: 81: 80: 75: 72: 68: 64: 61: 58: 54: 47: 43: 33: 30: 26: 22: 16: 907:. Retrieved 902: 898: 815: 801: (1972). 787: 783: 745: 735: 727: 723: 715: 711: 703: 699: 691: 687: 679: 675: 663:Oyez Project 651: 639:. Retrieved 629: 619: 607:. Retrieved 600:the original 595: 591: 578: 540: 528:. Retrieved 524:the original 510: 472: 465: 454: 433: 397: 394: 379:, joined by 369: 362: 354: 349: 336: 328: 316: 302: 278: 247: 246: 245: 232:Laws applied 182: 170: 163:Tom C. Clark 158: 146: 98:Case history 77: 59: 15: 909:February 8, 565: / 331:coffeehouse 261:state actor 219:Frankfurter 208:Concurrence 135:Earl Warren 922:Categories 641:October 2, 609:October 2, 553:75°32′59″W 550:39°44′42″N 530:October 2, 516:"About US" 416:References 267:Background 143:Hugo Black 90:U.S. LEXIS 769:cite book 496:cite book 365:Tom Clark 88:45; 1961 86:L. Ed. 2d 66:Citations 814:Text of 743:(1989). 404:See also 370:Justice 359:Decision 200:Majority 849:Findlaw 831:Cornell 478:Hamburg 224:Dissent 216:Dissent 211:Stewart 113:Holding 888:  882:  879:  873:  870:  867:Justia 864:  861:  855:  852:  846:  843:  837:  834:  828:  790:, 757:  728:Burton 716:Burton 704:Burton 692:Burton 680:Burton 484:  453:  436:, 309:sit-in 297:garage 185: 183:· 181:  173: 171:· 169:  161: 159:· 157:  149: 147:· 145:  25:Burton 822: 794: 603:(PDF) 588:(PDF) 440: 293:bonds 103:Prior 911:2021 824:U.S. 796:U.S. 775:link 755:ISBN 643:2013 611:2013 532:2013 502:link 482:ISBN 442:U.S. 337:The 279:The 92:1297 79:more 71:U.S. 69:365 905:(1) 820:365 799:163 792:407 445:715 438:365 263:." 74:715 27:v. 924:: 903:29 901:. 897:. 818:, 771:}} 767:{{ 749:. 665:, 661:, 634:. 628:. 596:16 594:. 590:. 518:. 498:}} 494:{{ 476:. 424:^ 913:. 777:) 763:. 645:. 613:. 534:. 504:) 490:. 459:. 82:) 76:(

Index

Burton
Wilmington Parking Authority
Supreme Court of the United States
U.S.
715
more
L. Ed. 2d
U.S. LEXIS
Delaware Supreme Court
Earl Warren
Hugo Black
Felix Frankfurter
William O. Douglas
Tom C. Clark
John M. Harlan II
William J. Brennan Jr.
Charles E. Whittaker
Potter Stewart
Fourteenth Amendment
United States Supreme Court
Equal Protection Clause
state actor

Wilmington Parking Authority
State of Delaware
City of Wilmington
bonds
garage
local Chrysler
sit-in

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.