Knowledge

Ground Combat Vehicle

Source đź“ť

703:
costs ranging from $ 29–34 billion. Several options were being considered to make the program more affordable, including reducing the squad size from nine men and using new emerging and undeveloped technologies to reduce the weight of the vehicle to 30 tons for operations in urban environments. The two contractors would run out of money for development of their prototype vehicles by June 2014 unless the Army funded the rest of the technology development phase. The Pentagon and Army tried to find ways to continue the program, without actually starting vehicle production, through new technologies like advanced fire control systems and hybrid engines. Although the Army wanted 1,894 Ground Combat Vehicles with a target price of $ 9–10.5 million per unit, the Pentagon's Office of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation estimated a unit cost of up to $ 17 million. The 83 percent cut in funding essentially scaled back the GCV program to a research effort. The program had declined in support over the past months with the Army determining that the desired vehicle was no longer feasible in the near term due to budget reductions, suspicion from the contractors that the program would not move past technology development, and Congress's belief it would not succeed.
744:
Dynamic's vehicle with a diesel engine weighed 62 tons in its most heavily armored configuration, which increased to 76 tons with the 20 percent future upgrade margin. Removing protection for easier air transportation would have reduced it to 56 tons. The Army's consideration to slow down the GCV development program gave time to the companies to refine their designs and reduce weight. One way would have been to reduce squad size. A nine-man squad has been identified as best for being able to fight with the possibility of taking casualties with single-vehicle transportability. With a three-man crew, the GCV had to carry 12 men. A greater number of lighter IFVs that carry fewer soldiers would have similar carrying capacity and combined costs and weight to planned GCV numbers. Another way would be an advance in armor designs. Lighter and stronger armor materials had not made radical progressions in recent history, and domestic active protection intercept systems were not yet mature. Foreign systems like the Israeli
773:. Vehicles like the Bradley and Abrams have been upgraded since the 1980s with new armor, sensors, and other gear that have maxed out the platforms for further horsepower and electrical advances, so the requirement for an entirely new ground combat vehicle built from the outset from lessons learned in combat from the previous decade remains. The Army's own budget proposal unveiled in March discontinued the program, and instead funds were shifted to the AMPV program as the main vehicle priority and to improving the Bradley IFV in the interim until more resources become available. Incremental improvements will be made to current vehicle fleets to improve protection and networking abilities. $ 131 million will be directed into science and technology to look at the feasibility of future combat vehicle technologies, and Secretary Hagel has directed the Army, as well as the Marine Corps, to deliver "realistic" visions for vehicle modernization by the end of FY 2014. 1372:(HED), which was developed by Northrop Grumman, that produced 1,100 kW of electricity. Advantages to it are fewer components and lower volume and weight compared to current power plants. The transmission was 40 percent smaller and the drive train had half the moving parts. The hybrid drive train cost 5 percent more than a mechanical system, but had a 20 percent reduction in life-cycle cost. The electric drive allows for smoother low-speed operation and less noise. The vehicle burned 20 percent less fuel while running, with 4.61 gallons (17.45 liters) per hour used while stationary. It had a top speed of 43 mph (70 km/h), could go from 0 to 20 mph (32.18 km/h) in 7.8 seconds, and had a range of 186 mi (299 km) with a 255-gallon fuel capacity. Disadvantages to the BAE design included a weight of 70 tons and fuel efficiency of 0.73 mpg. BAE integrated the 1082:, should be composed of nine to eleven soldiers. The M2 Bradley cannot carry a complete squad from one vehicle, creating risk when transitioning from mounted to dismounted operations. The Bradley's lower carrying capacity was accepted for greater (than previous vehicles) mounted lethality and cost savings, leading to squads being broken apart for transport. A GCV with a nine-man squad would have allowed the squad leader to control and communicate with the squad while mounted, simplify the transition to dismounted operations in complex terrain, and allow the squad to conduct independent fire and maneuver immediately upon dismount. Replacing the Bradley on a one-for-one basis would have four GCVs per mechanized infantry platoon carrying one full nine-man squad in a single vehicle, with three vehicles carrying squads and one carrying the platoon's organic and attached enablers. 662:
requirements made by the Army or the advancements made in the technology development phase of the program. They also criticized the comparisons of the other vehicles. The report factored cost, survivability, mobility, and lethality, ranking the GCV's capabilities as lower than all others. The Army questioned the suitability of existing design. An Army test of currently fielded vehicles in 2012 revealed that some met critical GCV requirements, but none met enough without needing significant redesign. They also note that lethality was judged with a 25 mm cannon for analysis, before the Army planned to mount a 30 mm cannon. The CBO report did give credit to cost, assuming the Army's goal of $ 13 million per vehicle. However, Pentagon cost assessments estimated the price at $ 16–$ 17 million per vehicle.
1385:
acceleration than ordinary engines. While powering a vehicle concept that reached 70 tons proved impractical, its benefits of providing power for onboard electronics, silent overwatch, and short, stealthy movements are still promising. BAE has pledged to support future Army developmental efforts with technologies from their GCV entry. In July 2014, BAE Systems was awarded a $ 7.9 million study contract for technical, cost, and risk assessments to utilize the GCV TD phase integrated hybrid-electric propulsion and mobility subsystems Automotive Test Rig (ATR) and the hybrid-electric integrated propulsion subsystem (Hotbuck) for the Future Fighting Vehicle (FFV) effort.
458:. An acquisition decision memorandum in August 2011 allowed the program to award technology development contracts. It also initiated two reviews of alternatives including a revised analysis of alternatives and an analysis of non-developmental vehicles. In August, the Army awarded technology development contracts to BAE and GDLS. BAE was awarded $ 450 million while GDLS was awarded $ 440 million. SAIC protest the award later that month, saying it believed the evaluations process was flawed and the evaluation took factors into consideration that were not stated in the request for proposal. The Army suspended work on the GCV until December, when the 637:(CBO) issued a report on the progress of the GCV program. The report questioned the program, estimated to cost $ 28 billion from 2014 to 2030, with the possibility of alternate vehicle options. While none met overall Army goals desired in the GCV, they offered advantages in being less costly and delayed. Planned GCV prototypes were heavy, weighing up to 84 tons, to be better protected and seat a nine-man squad. Officials said that a vehicle of that size would not be well suited to operations faced in Iraq or Afghanistan. Alternate vehicles would be cheaper and more maneuverable in urban settings. The CBO report analyzed four alternative options: 402: 294: 777:
to 2014, the Army spent over $ 1 billion on the GCV. Although there was criticism that vehicle weight could not be kept at a reasonable level while meeting its size and power requirements, the Army maintains the official reason for the cancellation was budgetary pressures. BAE Systems and General Dynamics will each receive $ 50 million in FY 2015 to continue technology development. The next follow-up IFV development program is currently named the Future Fighting Vehicle (FFV).
496: 884: 728:) as good as or better than other vehicles can protect against specific threats individually. This worked against the vehicle; as weight increases, cost goes up and maneuverability goes down. The contractors worked to bring the weight down. The Army maintained that heavy armor was needed to protect the squad from acceleration forces that come with an underside blast, and that thicker underbelly plates and 934:. The GCV was to have good cross-country mobility, with a baseline requirement of 30 mph off-road speed. The GCV should have delivered higher sustainability levels and consume less fuel than the Bradley or other vehicles of similar weight and power. The Army did not specify whether it preferred a tracked or wheeled solution, though the requirements seemed to suggest a tracked design was called for. 653:– More lethal than the GCV, combat survival and protection at better rates, and just as mobile. Purchasing the Puma would save $ 14.8 billion and was considered the most capable of the vehicles. Puma IFVs only carry six infantrymen, which would require five vehicles to replace every four Bradleys. Development and production would require collaboration with foreign companies and governments. 1029:. An array of hit avoidance systems would be leveraged and the Army offered the various active protection systems developed for the Manned Ground Vehicle program. The GCV enabled the detection and neutralization of mines at standoff ranges. The vehicle was to be equipped with an engagement detection system. The Army required the IFV to have the passive blast protection level equal to the 51: 527:, a double v-hulled M1126 infantry carrier vehicle and a turretless Bradley. The tests, completed that month, were carried out to determine what vehicle variants and configurations fulfill the Army's needs. The Army found that although the vehicles assessed met some GCV requirements, no currently fielded vehicle met enough without needing significant redesign. 484: 5052: 1133: 707:
development with the contractors was good. Science and technology investments were to be made to address the size and weight of armored ground vehicles to make it easier and cheaper to transport greater numbers of them across the world. On the recommendation of the Army, the DoD formally canceled the GCV program in February 2014.
792:
from the GCV program for the Future Fighting Vehicle (FFV) program. Citing budget constraints, in August 2015, the Army delayed the FFV's acquisition decision from FY2021 to FY2029. The Army said it was choosing to instead work on short-term capability gaps. In June 2018, the Army established what would become the
766:
entirely on budget calculations, with no possible way to come up with funds no matter how many other areas were reduced Money will be redistributed to engineering change proposals (ECP) on existing platforms until budget difficulties pass to allow investment in next-generation capabilities in about seven years.
1402:
Reports suggest that the SAIC–Boeing GCV proposal was rejected by the Army primarily due to concerns over the proposed vehicle’s survivability. The Army’s primary concern appeared to have been the vehicle’s proposed active protection system and the underbody armor designed to protect crewmembers from
776:
The cancellation of the GCV is the second time in 15 years an Army program to replace the Bradley has failed. FCS ran from 1999 to 2009, with the Manned Ground Vehicles portion for replacing several armored vehicle classes costing "hundreds of millions" of dollars out of $ 20 billion total. From 2010
748:
had seen combat but cannot yet intercept tank shells. The GCV program originally included an APS, but was then delayed as a feature for later upgrades. The last effort to replace the Bradley had been FCS from 2003 to 2009, which developed a vehicle that relied on sensors to avoid danger and an APS in
732:
do not give enough protection. More armor would come from the vehicle being larger for more internal space for the soldiers, and to allow for features such as floating floors for blast deflection and extra headroom. The Army also said heavy weight would not affect deployability because the Bradley it
678:
outlined two basic results if the effects of sequestration continued: modernization programs like the GCV would be cut to maintain troop levels, or high-end capability efforts like the GCV would be preserved to continue modernization and keep equipment technologically advanced with troop levels being
656:
Cancel the Ground Combat Vehicle – If the Army reconditioned its current Bradley instead of replacing them, the current capability of the IFV fleet could be maintained through 2030. The Army could continue to investigate ways to improve the current Bradleys, but it would not field any new or improved
645:
Upgrade the Bradley IFV – An upgraded Bradley would be more lethal than the GCV against enemy forces and would probably survive combat at about the same rates as would the GCV, saving $ 19.8 billion. Upgrading the Bradley would make it "significantly more capable" than the GCV. The Bradley still only
470:
The Army requested $ 884 million to fund the GCV in FY 2012. The technology development phase was to be a 24 months long, 3 months shorter than the previous plan. The Engineering and Manufacturing Development phase was to be 48 months long. The Army planned on acquiring 1,874 GCVs to replace Bradleys
1406:
While SAIC and the German MOD offered potential solutions, the Army judged these as inadequate to address its concerns. There were also additional Army concerns—such as insufficient head clearance for crew members, problems with vehicle occupant seating, a risk of toxic fumes in the crew compartment
698:
By mid-November 2013, both BAE and General Dynamics designs had passed Preliminary Design Reviews (PDR), but neither company had commenced building prototypes. The Army was increasingly willing to slow down the GCV program or push it back from EMD to research and development. While the Army had said
351:
Up to three competitive contracts were to be awarded by early fall. A prototype development contract decision would have followed by 2013. The Technology Development Phase (or Milestone A) would begin in the fourth quarter of Fiscal Year 2010 with the award of up to three vehicle contracts. This was
325:
met in Washington D.C. to determine the requirements for the Ground Combat Vehicle. It was concluded at this meeting that an infantry fighting vehicle (IFV) was to be the first vehicle variant fielded. Later that month, FCS was formally dissolved and many programs including the Manned Ground Vehicle
1384:
Although dramatic funding cuts for the GCV program in January 2014 put the very completion of the acquisition effort in jeopardy, funding remained for research on a hybrid-electric propulsion system. The BAE GCV's hybrid-electric engine is more fuel efficient, has fewer moving parts, and has faster
961:
system. The weapons suite had to be manually operable when damaged and the commander's weapon station had to incorporate a shield. Additionally, a dismountable anti-armor weapon would be carried on board. The Army also stated that the weapon suite would emphasize modularity, be able to defeat other
765:
said that criticism of the program was "unfortunate" and cancelling it had nothing to do with vehicle performance. Shyu said the program had been doing "remarkably well" and wasn't having technical issues, and that the contracts were being executed well. The decision to cancel development was based
702:
In January 2014, a spending bill passed by the House appropriated $ 100 million for the GCV program, even though the Army had requested $ 592 million for the program for FY2014. The Army planned to spend 80 percent of its ground vehicle modernization budget on the GCV over the next five years, with
694:
report suggested that given budgetary constraints, the GCV program may be unrealistic, and that one potential discussion could focus on a decision by the Army to replace the GCV with the AMPV as their number one ground combat vehicle acquisition priority. An October 2013 Congressional Budget Office
624:
The Army revised the GCV acquisition strategy in January 2013 to reduce risk and maintain affordability of the program. The revision extended the technology development phase by six months to give industry more time to refine vehicle designs. Milestone B would occur in 2014, with the selection of a
615:
were each awarded engineering and manufacturing development (EMD) phase contracts in August 2011. The EMD phase was to last 48 months for both contractors. Senate appropriators were also concerned that the GCV would compete with the Army's other combat modernization priorities. Though the GCV would
329:
In October and November 2009, the Army held informational sessions for potential GCV contractors. Also that month, Program Executive Office Integration was established to oversee subsystems of BCT Modernization including the GCV. A required review was held and passed in February 2010 in Washington.
1040:
shield would provide protection for the vehicle commander when exposed through the turret. In addition, a Vehicle Health Management System would provide vehicle diagnostic monitoring systems for commanders. A fire suppression system and ammunition detonation protection would be utilized for damage
791:
At the time of the GCV's cancelation, it was thought that the Army might direct some funds for technology development so that it could start another program within "three to four years." In August 2014 GDLS and BAE Systems Land and Armaments were awarded $ 7.9 million each to develop technologies
982:
for 30x173 mm ammunition: High Explosive Incendiary-Tracer (HEI-T), Piercing Fin Stabilized Discarding Sabot-Tracer (APFSDS-T); Armor Piercing Fin Stabilized Discarding Sabot-Tracer (APFSDS-T); and Target Practice Discarding Sabot-Tracer (TPDS-T). The announcement called for the cartridges to be
743:
Both contractors claimed their designs were below the 70–84 tons expectation of what the GCV will weigh. BAE's vehicle weighed 60–70 tons, based on modular armor package, and a 20 percent margin for weight increase the Army had planned for future upgrades would bring it up to 84 tons. General
661:
General Dynamics and BAE Systems, who received contracts in the Ground Combat Vehicle program, criticized the CBO report, saying they used the wrong vehicle in its analysis. Officials from both companies said they used the wrong notional model of the GCV that did not account for the change in
641:
Purchase the Namer APC – Seats 9 soldiers with combat survival rates expected slightly higher than the GCV, and costs $ 9 billion less. The Namer has less ability to destroy other enemy vehicles and is less mobile. Production would be conducted in part domestically, but fielding would require
706:
In January 2014, Odierno confirmed that the GCV program was being put on hold due to budget difficulties. Odierno said that the Army needed a new IFV but that they could not afford one at the time. Odierno said that he was pleased with the requirements for the vehicle and that progress and
1393:
In October 2013, General Dynamics successfully completed a preliminary design review of their GCV design. Subsystem and component design reviews were held from August to October of that year and led to the four-day PDR. General Dynamics demonstrated their vehicle met Tier 1 affordability,
1091: 1014:
system. By incorporating an APS, the GCV would only need 18 tons of ballistic armor protection, compared to 52 tons of armor required without it. Developers were considering modular armor technology, with the ability to add on and remove armor plates depending on threat levels and mission
1376:
Iron Curtain active protection system to defeat incoming rockets and missiles before they can hit the vehicle. The Army conducted tests on the system in April 2013, and it successfully passed all tests. BAE tested a system for the vehicle to drive in low visibility conditions using a
1367:
The BAE Systems GCV design had a steel-core hull and an integrated electronic network capability with embedded intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance equipment. Its turret was unmanned. The centerpiece of the vehicle was its simplified drive train. It was propelled by a
606:
In December 2012, it was reported that the Army may need to cut $ 150 million from the GCV program in 2014, with deeper cuts between $ 600–700 million between 2014 and 2018. This put the program, one of the Army's highest priorities, at serious risk. With the drawdown of the
438:
An industry day was held in October in Dearborn, Michigan. The Army reduced its requested FY 2011 budget to $ 462 million. Advanced Defense Vehicle Systems, General Dynamics Land Systems, and BAE Systems announced their intention of re-competing soon after the cancellation.
1098:
The Army was using an incremental approach to combat vehicle modernization, centered on the Ground Combat Vehicle. The deployment was to be synchronized with upgrades, reset, and divestiture of existing vehicles. Vehicles displaced by the IFV may then replace selected
625:
single vendor for the engineering and manufacturing development (EMD) phase of the program. Budgetary pressures caused the Army to reduce the number of vendors to be selected for EMD from two to one. The Army expected this change would save the DoD $ 2.5 billion.
4886: 1141:
BAE Systems, Northrop Grumman, QinetiQ and Saft Group were working jointly on development. The program was managed by Mark Signorelli. The team believed it could field the vehicle up to two years sooner than projected. Development cost were "tens of millions of
449:
were to be awarded nine months after the RfP was released. The Army delivered an analysis of alternatives to Congress in April 2011. The notional GCV fared well compared to comparable vehicles including the Stryker and foreign counterparts such as the Israeli
715:
In November 2012, estimates of the GCV's weight, depending on armor packages, put the General Dynamics entry vehicle at 64–70 tons, and the BAE Systems entry vehicle at 70–84 tons. This made the planned infantry fighting vehicle designs heavier than the
4975: 4297: 3800: 172:
The Army canceled the GCV program in 2014 due to the service's budget constraints. The cancellation of the GCV program marked a setback for the U.S. Army, which had been looking to modernize its armored fighting vehicle fleet for many years. The
3091: 381:
In August 2010 the Army retracted its request for proposals after the team assembled in May recommended that the Army either upgrade the existing ground vehicle fleet or rewrite the requirements. A new RFP was to be issued 60 days later. When
145:
The program was intended to provide increased protection and firepower for ground troops, with a focus on improved crew survivability. The Army planned on acquiring 1,874 GCV infantry fighting vehicles to replace Bradleys in 16 active and 8
5284: 977:
rounds to defeat material threats, and training ammunition for each tactical round. Potential candidates included five U.S. produced and three foreign-made rounds. In August 2013, a sources sought announcement was made for a
874:
The GCV was to be networked and offer improved survivability. Elements of the Manned Ground Vehicles program were provided—such as the armor matrix—were provided to contractors to be utilized in design proposals for the GCV.
4878: 348:. In May, a team was formed to expedite the GCV's seven-year development time. For fiscal year 2011, the U.S. Army sought to spend $ 934 million of the $ 2.5 billion allocated for BCT Modernization to develop the GCV. 3484: 1115:
The infantry fighting vehicle variant replaced the previous infantry carrier replacement effort, the XM1206 Infantry Carrier Vehicle of the FCS MGV program. The IFV was to hold a crew of three and a squad of nine.
5304: 2830: 5105:
Pernin, Christopher; Axelband, Elliot; Drezner, Jeffrey; Dille, Brian; Gordon IV, John; Held, Bruce; McMahon, Scott; Perry, Walter; Rizzi, Christopher; Shah, Akhil; Wilson, Peter; Sollinger, Sollinger (2012).
4301: 856:
said that the "four main fundamentals" of the vehicle were: The ability to carry 12 soldiers and operate in all forms of combat; have significant protection; and deliver the first production vehicle by 2018.
253:
laid out his vision for a lighter, more transportable force. He called for a mid-weight unit that would strike a balance between heavy armor and infantry. Shinseki said such a unit would be geared toward for
2610: 164:
The program faced significant challenges from the start, including limited funding and concerns about the weight of the vehicle. The GCV was designed to be heavily armored and to transport a fully equipped
3792: 4660: 3831: 3414: 1894: 1921: 3662: 1403:
IEDs. As part of GAO’s examination of the protest, it was noted that the Army identified 20 significant weaknesses and informed SAIC that it was "of utmost importance" for the firm to address them.
1107:
and Stryker vehicles may have been considered as risk mitigation based on the rate at which the GCV was introduced. Although upgraded, the Bradley and Stryker would also be replaced in the midterm.
4722: 4344: 2689: 412:
The Engineering and Manufacturing Development Phase was to begin with two prototype development contracts awarded in the beginning of FY2013. The first prototypes would be manufactured mid-FY2015.
3005: 1338:
Advanced Defense Vehicle Systems (ADVS) submitted its wheeled proposal which was rejected for being non-compliant. ADVS protested the decision, but withdrew it after the Army canceled the RfP.
3738: 2220: 1569: 5294: 2807: 5299: 3099: 2713:"Stryker not lethal enough, Bradley not big enough JOURNAL ARTICLE Stryker not lethal enough, Bradley not big enough: Lawmakers, Auditors Get A Chance to Examine Army's Analysis On GCV" 2457: 5250: 5243: 5231: 3700: 390: 3498: 3443: 3313: 3647: 4322: 2167: 3272: 2943: 3217: 699:
previously that the GCV was their highest priority acquisition program, they had since shifted their main modernization priority to an integrated electronic command network.
616:
make up only 10 percent of the Army combat vehicle fleet, the Army had programmed 80 percent of its combat vehicle modernization budget for the GCV over the next five years.
3238: 906:
The Mounted Soldier System was to enhance situational awareness through wireless communications and input from vehicle sensors and external sources such as other vehicles.
4848: 3557: 1381:
with blacked out windows as a surrogate. In August 2013, the BAE GCV's hybrid electric drive completed 2,000 miles of testing on a fully integrated stationary test stand.
4940: 2494: 3595: 409:
The Technology Development Phase was to begin with the award of up to three vehicle contracts in late FY2010. The Army planned to spend $ 7.6 billion during this phase.
4453: 4275: 258:. The Army was to do this by investing in an interim fleet that would herald the way to a much more advanced subsequent generation of vehicles. The Army initiated the 4776: 941:. The Army stated no preference as to whether the IFV should be tracked or wheeled but suggested that it be tracked due to the weight stemming from the requirements. 3038: 2606: 1506: 686:(AMPV) program to replace the M113 family of vehicles was being favored over the GCV program. While procurement of the AMPV fleet would cost over $ 5 billion, the 4218: 4074: 1407:
due to battery pack location, and various hazards affecting a soldier’s ability to exit the rear of the GCV—that played a role in GAO’s denial of SAIC’s protest.
1394:
reliability, and other requirements. The success of the PDR meant that the General Dynamics GCV IFV could be expected to be operationally effective and suitable.
1100: 979: 574: 419:
Phase was to begin with a low-rate production contract awarded in mid FY2016. Less than two years after the contract award LRIP would begin. After more testing a
4916: 2072: 1103:
such as command and control, medical evacuation, and mortar carrier, allowing the Army to begin divestiture of the M113 family of vehicles. Upgrades to existing
841:
6. The shortfalls of rapid deployment would be mitigated through an incremental addition of components as technology matures. The Army provided details from the
4568: 383: 3823: 3422: 3191: 4107: 868:
and offer improved survivability, mobility, and power management functions. The GCV family would use technologies pioneered with the IFV lead vehicle effort.
1917: 1886: 1454: 181: 101: 4035: 3895: 3769: 3391: 1536: 1284:
SAIC led a consortium called Team Full Spectrum which included Boeing, Krauss-Maffei and Rheinmetall. The SAIC consortium is using a derivative of the Puma.
3659: 4714: 4336: 3681: 2685: 285:
being the limiting factor. This weight requirement proved difficult to meet. Weight at full combat capability (FCC) had risen to 27 tons by January 2007.
4959: 3068: 2278: 4754: 4687: 1577: 4856: 4009: 2997: 430:
The Army would then decide whether to go into full-rate production. The Army planned on procuring 1,450 IFVs at a total program cost of $ 40 billion.
169:
of nine soldiers, something the Bradley could not do. This requirement necessitated adding significant weight to the vehicle, making it less mobile.
3457: 899:. It would provide exportable electrical power, and a battery charging capability for external hardware including vehicles and electronics from the 674:
warned that the GCV program might be delayed or possibly even cancelled because of the sequestration budget cuts. In August 2013, Defense Secretary
359:
Nine vehicles were evaluated in the Army's 2011 Analysis of Alternatives (AOA) for the GCV. The four primary vehicles included in the AOA were the
318:
representatives outlined plans for the cancellation of Future Combat Systems and the initiation of the Ground Combat Vehicle program in its place.
238:
program. The Army studied a family of vehicles utilizing common components. A heavy chassis variant would replace vehicles ranging from howitzers,
3730: 1724: 1078:
The Army placed importance on the GCV's ability to carry a full nine-man squad. Numerous Army studies have concluded that a squad, made up of two
786: 255: 245:
The post–Cold War period saw the Army begin to realize the importance of deploying globally on short notice to small-scale contingencies. In 2000
3930: 3716: 749:
place of heavy armor. It was too ambitious for the time and the vehicle's weight had grown from 19 tons to 30 tons by the time it was cancelled.
3321: 2803: 2464: 1836: 837:
The Army emphasized affordability, rapid deployment, and low-risk technology for the GCV. The Army required that all aspects of the GCV be at
608: 5190: 5075: 5022: 3697: 5289: 5200: 4177: 1025:
Thermal management and acoustic noise reduction would be utilized to avoid detection. The vehicle would be able to avoid threats by laying
922:
The GCV must have been transportable by cargo aircraft, rail, and ship. The Army required it to meet the availability rates of the current
297: 4825: 2637: 2427: 2095: 2037: 1944: 937:
In its standard configuration, the IFV would have a crew of three and carry a squad of nine. The vehicle could be reconfigured to support
679:
cut. Odierno was committed to balancing soldiers, readiness, and modernization, and was intent on the need for the Ground Combat Vehicle.
5144: 4538: 4483: 4366: 3294: 1831: 1627: 1161:
Northrop Grumman would provide technology pertaining to command, control, communications, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance.
2978: 2159: 3961: 3264: 2950: 1857: 1460: 793: 769:
The decision had to be made to either exclusively fund the GCV or ECPs, so upgrades were chosen for the Bradley, Abrams, Stryker, and
204: 5139: 1488: 5114: 4403: 4142: 442:
The revised RfP was issued in November. ADVS announced that it would not submit a proposal due to the program's extended timeline.
4605: 2517: 2253: 5221: 3565: 3231: 849:(MGV) effort to utilize on the GCV. The GCV was required to have better protection than any vehicle in the military's inventory. 687: 459: 401: 4937: 720:
tank. The reason was the vehicle had to have enough armor to protect a squad of nine troops from all battlefield threats (from
4804: 3587: 5132: 2490: 1464: 1448: 1442: 800:
and GDLS to go forward in the competition for the OMFV contract, now designated the XM30 Mechanized Infantry Combat Vehicle.
691: 368: 200: 196: 4461: 4267: 2777: 695:
report found that $ 16 billion could be saved over the next 13 years if the GCV were canceled in favor of Bradley upgrades.
4780: 3626: 3030: 1421: 1212: 1007: 683: 561: 235: 192: 158: 5279: 5236: 3855:"First Configuration to Be Infantry Fighting Vehicle: Chiarelli: Ground Combat Vehicle Will Be 'Upgradeable,' Versatile" 3153:"Move to single EMD vendor would save $ 2.5 billion: Pentagon Affirms Major GCV Program Changes For Billions In Savings" 1243:
General Dynamics Land Systems led the team as systems integrator and was responsible for soldier interfaces and chassis.
389:
was asked if the Army was developing an alternative to the GCV, Chiarelli replied "We're totally committed to GCV." The
344:
In July, management of the GCV was transferred from PEO Integration to PEO Ground Combat Systems with Andrew DiMarco as
4210: 4066: 4908: 2396: 2365: 2334: 2068: 737: 725: 634: 416: 353: 4575: 973:
capability to defeat infantry targets (with high explosive incendiary recognized as a "less effective alternative"),
1655:"Service Wants to Be Lighter, Faster, More Lethal: Army Chief of Staff's 'vision' Is Focused on Medium-weight Force" 611:
and budgetary concerns, the expensive development of a new combat vehicle was not seen as feasible. BAE Systems and
5274: 3870: 3360: 3168: 2869: 2728: 1470: 846: 838: 274: 5195: 4043: 3903: 3761: 3383: 2892: 809: 512: 228: 188: 135: 64: 3129: 281:
for armor, the Army sought to reduce the weight of a Manned Ground Vehicle to 20 tons, with transportability by
5149: 4511: 4115: 3678: 1427: 1104: 1000: 958: 721: 293: 278: 246: 131: 4956: 2282: 883: 5107: 4750: 4683: 1022:(MSS) was being developed for GCV crew members. Dismounted leaders would utilize the Ground Soldier Systems. 187:
After the cancelation of the GCV program, the U.S. Army shifted its focus to upgrading its existing fleet of
1774: 1433: 1011: 827: 745: 259: 4013: 378:, and a modernized M1 Abrams. Vehicles included the AOA were determined to be inferior to the planned GCV. 231:
entered service in 1983. Although production ended in 1995, it was upgraded numerous times over the years.
4631: 3064: 2751: 2660: 1030: 1019: 1071:
would have 4. Platoons were to be led by platoon leader GCV which would be accompanied by platoon medic,
5216: 3345:"Pros, cons and billions in savings: CBO Lays Out Potential Plan To Cancel Army's Ground Combat Vehicle" 2308: 1369: 914:
The IFV would provide exportable electrical power, and battery charging capability for soldier systems.
842: 582: 515:
to prepare the Army for Milestone B. The non-developmental vehicle analysis assessed five vehicles, the
315: 270: 178: 174: 28: 1728: 1203:
Wider and taller than a Bradley. All or most of the storage was internal accounting for the extra size.
3926: 1980: 1003:. The Army wanted to install an active protection system on the Ground Combat Vehicle. BAE tested the 903:
subsystems. The system would be capable of integration with unmanned systems and dismounted soldiers.
5175: 4426: 2918: 2577: 2548: 2435: 2216: 2103: 2045: 1954: 931: 331: 308: 1158:
BAE would provide general vehicle design, program management, integration of the vehicle components.
930:, which, in the past, constrained many designs. Air mobility would be provided by the more spacious 812:(IFV) would be its first priority with the GCV program. The Army determined that it would reset the 4879:"BAE Systems Ground Combat Vehicle Hybrid Electric Drive successfully completed 2000 miles testing" 1826: 1060: 1053: 965:
The Army evaluated weapons solutions ranging from 25 mm to 50 mm caliber, and identified
938: 586: 472: 150: 147: 2126: 830:
in the meantime while the GCV was undergoing development. The GCV could later serve as the common
203:, which includes AMPV within its scope. In 2018 the Army established what came to be known as the 5008: 4184: 3862: 3518: 3352: 3211: 3160: 2861: 2854:"Puma still in play for AOA: Army Lifts Stop-Work Order On GCV After GAO Denies SAIC Bid Protest" 2720: 1662: 1072: 984: 853: 446: 386: 335: 301: 127: 17: 4241: 1090: 4957:
Army asks BAE Systems and General Dynamics to recycle GCV vetronics for Future Fighting Vehicle
2633: 2008: 234:
The U.S. Army's efforts to develop a successor to the Bradley began in the mid-1980s under the
5185: 5160: 5071: 5018: 4821: 4400:
Understanding Why a Ground Combat Vehicle That Carries Nine Dismounts Is Important to the Army
2190: 1037: 524: 500: 495: 322: 239: 4542: 4491: 4373: 1036:
The Army made available the composition of the armor of the Manned Ground Vehicle program. A
1751: 816: 612: 551: 543: 375: 3968: 1868: 969:
as "the most likely" design to meet the GCV's requirements. Specific requirements were for
808:
Following the cancelation of the Future Combat Systems family the Army assessed that a new
5063: 5033: 4963: 4944: 4808: 3704: 3685: 3666: 3531: 1827:"Future Combat System (FCS) Program Transitions to Army Brigade Combat Team Modernization" 1216: 1052:
The Infantry Fighting Vehicle variant was intended to fill the infantry transport role in
895:
but would gradually use a more state-of-the-art networked integration system known as the
565: 345: 199:
family. The Army has embarked on a comprehensive combat vehicle acquisition effort called
1075:, Radio Transmission Operator, and other attachments and would command three other GCVs. 5154: 4601: 4399: 4149: 3824:"OMFV finalists: Rheinmetall, GDLS again square off for Bradley replacement competition" 367:
Plus MRAP. The five secondary vehicles included two unnamed foreign-made platforms, the
242:
and Bradleys. This effort was canceled in 1992 due to the collapse of the Soviet Union.
5012: 2525: 1220: 974: 970: 954: 927: 861: 796:(OMFV) program to replace the M2 Bradley. In June 2023, the Army downselected American 314:
announced his intention of halting funding for the FCS in April 2009. In May, Army and
334:(RFP) was issued in February 2010. It was revealed in the RfP that the GCV would be a 5268: 5056: 2998:"Army assesses current vehicles as part of Ground Combat Vehicle development process" 250: 5120:
from the original on 25 March 2020 – via Defense Technical Information Center.
4976:
General Dynamics completed Preliminary Design Review of Ground Combat Vehicle design
1129:
There were four known competing contractors for the Ground Combat Vehicle contract.
761:
canceled the GCV, accepting the Army's request to do so. Army acquisition executive
5150:
Popsci.com: The U.S. Army's New 84-Ton Tank Prototype Is Nearly IED-Proof (Updated)
4801: 4431: 1985: 1949: 1887:"U.S. Army Meets with Industry Representatives to Conceive a Ground Combat Vehicle" 1026: 824: 770: 516: 311: 27:
This article is about the U.S. Army program. For the class of combat vehicles, see
5034:
The Army's Ground Combat Vehicle (GCV) Program: Background and Issues for Congress
1044:
A secondary squad egress was to be provided for the squad to exit in emergencies.
2404: 2373: 2342: 1800: 352:
to be followed by an Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD) phase and
5180: 4849:"Undeterred By Possible Delays, BAE Continues Ground Combat Vehicle Development" 3618: 1918:"Army Establishes Program Executive Office Integration to Support Modernization" 1510: 1190:
Baseline weight of 53 tons with a weight tolerance of 75 tons for modular armor.
962:
IFVs, and provide non-lethal capability to enable use in civilian environments.
900: 896: 865: 797: 758: 675: 671: 539: 154: 5086: 3731:"General Dynamics, BAE Systems Win Study Contracts For Future Fighting Vehicle" 2634:"Military vehicle maker drops protest, will try again for government contracts" 1132: 535:
There were three competing contractors for the Ground Combat Vehicle contract.
1825:
Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs) (23 June 2009),
1494: 1482: 1373: 950: 820: 762: 650: 508: 455: 364: 360: 225: 139: 3619:"Hagel Cuts Army's Size, Kills GCV, Backs Service Aviation Restructure Plans" 2069:"The future of ground combat vehicles resides with PEO Ground Combat Systems" 363:
II, a modernized Stryker, an M2A3 Bradley variant used in Iraq, and a XM1230
3660:
Shyu Sings The Army Electric: 2015 Budget Sacrifices Weapons For Electronics
1064: 1004: 813: 717: 657:
vehicles. The $ 24 billion saved in funding could be used on other programs.
488: 420: 372: 221: 191:. Canceling the GCV freed up Army development resources to proceed with the 4398:
Held, Bruce; Lorell, Mark A.; Quinlivan, James T.; Chad C., Serena (2013).
995:
The Army wanted the GCV to have a blast protection level equivalent to the
207:
program, the modern successor to the GCV infantry fighting vehicle effort.
50: 4143:"The Ground Combat Vehicle In the Conduct of Future Operational Concepts" 3098:. Vol. 24, no. 49. Inside Washington Publishers. Archived from 1224: 1079: 966: 569: 3866: 3854: 3356: 3344: 3164: 3152: 2865: 2853: 2724: 2712: 1666: 1654: 483: 1437: 1068: 983:
compatible with the Bushmaster III weapon system, such as XM813 and/or
923: 831: 734: 547: 507:
Testing of commercially available combat vehicles began in May 2012 at
424: 263: 2279:"Army Evaluated Nine Vehicles Against GCV In Analysis Of Alternatives" 1661:. Vol. 15, no. 41. Inside Washington Publishers. p. 6. 1436:, a U.S. Army combat vehicle acquisition program that resulted in the 949:
The Army wanted the vehicle to feature a commander's weapons station,
277:
program, a family of eight vehicles including an IFV. By substituting
5087:
Technical Challenges of the U.S. Army's Ground Combat Vehicle Program
3698:
FY15 Army budget, request includes small pay raise, 490K end strength
3121: 2686:"10--Ground Combat Vehicle Technology Development Phase Solicitation" 1463:, a current U.S. Army infantry fighting vehicle program (part of the 1378: 1197: 729: 578: 555: 5017:(32nd ed.). Surrey: Janes Information Group. pp. 458–464. 2607:"Contractors to resubmit bids for revamped military vehicle program" 4715:"General Dynamics Team Submits Army Ground Combat Vehicle Proposal" 3198:. Military Advantage. Archived from the original on 23 October 2017 1537:"Ground Combat Vehicle Infantry Fighting Vehicle Statement of Work" 273:(FCS) program in 2000. The combat vehicle component of FCS was the 1476: 1473:, the planned set of armored cavalry vehicles for the British Army 1131: 1089: 882: 690:
estimated the GCV fleet would cost $ 37 billion. A September 2013
520: 494: 482: 451: 400: 292: 282: 166: 5055:
This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the
1479:, a heavy infantry fighting vehicle of the Israeli Defence Forces 503:
demonstrator vehicle for the non-developmental vehicle assessment
3415:"Ground Combat Vehicle Budget Slashed, Cancellation More Likely" 996: 5158: 3962:"The Ground Combat Vehicle Strategy: Optimizing for the Future" 3558:"Bradley Offspring, GCV, May Top 84 Tons, Heavier Than M1 Tank" 3485:
US Army Chief Confirms: Ground Combat Vehicle Is Dead (For Now)
4137: 4135: 4133: 3717:
Army Budget Makes Force Structure, Modernization Cuts Official
1570:"US Army, Marines Struggle With Infantry Vehicle Replacements" 1500: 1252:
Raytheon would develop the active protection systems, sensors.
926:. The Army did not limit the vehicle by the dimensions of the 834:
for a family of vehicles to replace legacy armored vehicles.
393:
suggested deferring development of the GCV until after 2015.
5285:
Post–Cold War armored fighting vehicles of the United States
5068:
Bradley: A History of American Fighting and Support Vehicles
4779:. Inside Washington Publishers. 28 June 2010. Archived from 4777:"Michigan Company Protests Rejection Of Its Wheeled GCV Bid" 1531: 1529: 1527: 1329:
Used conventional diesel and a six-road-wheel configuration.
4300:. Defence Market Intelligence. 24 June 2013. Archived from 4298:"US Army; Two contenders gear up for GCV active protection" 4036:"U.S. Army Defines Ground Combat Vehicles (GCV) Priorities" 3351:. Vol. 25, no. 46. Inside Washington Publishers. 2860:. Vol. 23, no. 49. Inside Washington Publishers. 2804:"SAIC-Led Team Protests U.S. Army Combat Vehicle Contracts" 2719:. Vol. 23, no. 15. Inside Washington Publishers. 2281:. Inside Washington Publisher. January 2010. Archived from 1164:
QinetiQ would provide the electric drive propulsion system.
1010:
and General Dynamics demonstrated a version of the Israeli
871:
The Army's GCV requirements were left somewhat open-ended.
134:. The first variant of the GCV to be developed would be an 4986: 4984: 3625:. Vol. 30, no. 9. Inside Washington Publishers. 1710: 1698: 1686: 5085:
Kempinski, Bernard; Murphy, Christopher (November 2012).
3896:"US Army Defines Ground Combat Vehicles (GCV) Priorities" 3232:
The Army's Ground Combat Vehicle Program and Alternatives
3122:"Army Ground Combat Vehicle Acquisition Strategy Revised" 3092:"Massive GCV Cuts On The Table As Army 'Reviews' Program" 1597: 1595: 1445:, a canceled U.S. Marine Corps amphibious assault vehicle 177:
had canceled the Army's previous combat vehicle program,
2518:"Panel rejects bid to divert funds for Bradley upgrades" 1858:"U.S. Army Announces Ground Combat Vehicle Industry Day" 1457:, a canceled tracked U.S. Army infantry fighting vehicle 1306:
Both Krauss-Maffei and Rheinmetall's roles were unknown.
1059:
In the U.S. Army, as part of the ongoing restructuring,
5232:
Multifunctional Utility/Logistics and Equipment vehicle
5011:, ed. (2011). "Armoured Personnel Carriers (Tracked)". 3314:"US Army Looks To Delay, Increase Cost of AMPV Program" 391:
National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform
266:
wheeled combat vehicle family entered service in 2002.
130:
in 2009, with the goal of developing a next-generation
5305:
Infantry fighting vehicles of the post–Cold War period
3320:. Gannett Government Media Corporation. Archived from 1246:
Lockheed Martin would develop the turret and weaponry.
1200:
and Hard-Kill and Soft-Kill active protection systems.
423:-sized team would be attained in FY2018 followed by a 5169:
Early Infantry Brigade Combat Team Capability Package
5108:
Lessons from the Army's Future Combat Systems Program
4454:"Army Partially Terminates FCS Manned Ground Vehicle" 3890: 3888: 3480: 3478: 1563: 1561: 642:
collaboration with foreign companies and governments.
598:
A Milestone C decision could have been made in 2019.
4709: 4707: 4705: 4533: 4531: 4529: 4490:. The Associated Press. 1 March 2010. Archived from 4484:"BAE, Northrop to develop new ground combat vehicle" 4108:"US Army Outlines Ground Combat Vehicles Priorities" 3295:"Ground Combat Vehicle may be delayed – or canceled" 341:
By the May deadline, four proposals were submitted.
5209: 5168: 4539:"BAE, Northrop expand team to bid on Army contract" 3237:(Report). Congressional Budget Office. April 2013. 2802:Roxana Tiron and Brendan McGarry (26 August 2011). 2397:"Malcolm O'Neill, Acquisition Executive, U.S. Army" 2248: 2246: 2244: 2242: 2240: 2238: 2038:"U.S. Army GCV Protest Not Expected to Cause Delay" 1249:
Detroit Diesel would develop the propulsion system.
108: 96: 91: 83: 78: 70: 60: 41: 4337:"Army Looks Beyond Armor to Upgrade Vehicle Fleet" 2600: 2598: 2549:"U.S. Army to Set Out Tiered Requirements for GCV" 2307:Bennett, John T.; Brannen, Kate (26 August 2010). 2217:"Budget cuts for vehicles hit defense contractors" 4632:"Firm wants Army to use hybrid technology on GCV" 4003: 4001: 3999: 3997: 3995: 3993: 3991: 3989: 3444:US Army's GCV Program Downgraded To Study Project 2778:"BAE, GD awarded Ground Combat Vehicle contracts" 1485:, an infantry fighting vehicle of the German Army 1187:Tracked with an E-X-Drive hybrid-electric engine. 356:(LRIP) phase before full production could start. 5295:Abandoned military projects of the United States 5070:. Battleboro, VT: Echo Point Books & Media. 4938:Army Attempts to Salvage GCV Technology Advances 3216:: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown ( 3192:"Report: GCV is worst choice to replace Bradley" 2571: 2569: 5300:Infantry fighting vehicles of the United States 4427:"U.S. Army Details Ground Combat Vehicle Plans" 3793:"MPF, AMPV now part of NGCV family of vehicles" 3617:Bertuca, Tony; Judson, Jen (27 February 2014). 3384:"Big Army For Big Wars? Yes! GCV? Probably Not" 3031:"Army, industry slam CBO's scathing GCV report" 2096:"Experts Study U.S. Army's GCV Plans, Schedule" 1981:"Army to Issue Ground Combat Vehicle RfP Today" 1801:"U.S. Army Details Ground Combat Vehicle Plans" 893:battle command control and communications suite 4602:"Army sees new rules for combat vehicles soon" 4268:"Army Refines 30mm Ammunition Efforts for GCV" 3762:"Army Delays Future Fighting Vehicle To FY-29" 3648:US Army Official Defends GCV Against 'Attacks' 3499:"Army leaders preview lighter, faster service" 3458:"GCV's Loss Will Reset Army Buying Priorities" 980:Cooperative Research and Development Agreement 5134:Official U.S. Army Ground Combat Vehicle page 4654: 4652: 4541:. Bloomberg L.P. 26 July 2010. Archived from 3956: 3954: 3952: 3950: 3948: 3382:Freedberg Jr., Sydney J. (13 November 2013). 2893:"Army seeks 30 percent less for overseas ops" 2831:"U.S. Ground Combat Vehicle Work Put On Hold" 2009:"Army launches Ground Combat Vehicle contest" 1167:Saft would provide the energy storage system. 384:Vice Chief of Staff of the United States Army 8: 4909:"Hopes Dim for BAE's 'Green' Combat Vehicle" 3588:"BAE, GD: We Can Cut Weight From Army's GCV" 3505:. Gannett. Archived from on 28 January 2014 2491:"Contractors vie for lucrative vehicle work" 1945:"DoD Postpones Ground Combat Vehicle Review" 1775:"Panel to Discuss New Ground Combat Vehicle" 1752:"US Army outlines how it will 'devolve' FCS" 1300:SAIC would lead the team as project manager. 891:The GCV was to be operable with the current 646:carries a 7-man squad and has less mobility. 4855:. National Defense Industrial Association. 4802:BAE Systems releases details of hybrid tank 4625: 4623: 4512:"BAE Offers Hybrid-Electric Combat Vehicle" 4242:"Casey: Make Ground Combat Vehicle lighter" 4102: 4100: 4098: 4096: 4094: 4092: 3719:- Nationaldefensemagazine.org, 4 March 2014 3025: 3023: 2919:"U.S. Army To Host GCV Industry Day Oct. 1" 2752:"GCV moves ahead, but more studies ordered" 2153: 2151: 2149: 2147: 1628:"Army drops contracts for armored vehicles" 491:during non-developmental vehicle assessment 5155: 4367:"Towards a Comprehensive Vehicle Strategy" 3679:Army 2015 Budget Kills GCV, Cuts Readiness 2578:"Fewer FCS Technologies for GCV Round Two" 2366:"U.S. Army's GCV Delay: Lesson Unlearned?" 2127:"No More Humvees in 2011 Procurement Plan" 670:In July 2013, Army Chief of Staff General 195:(AMPV), the service's replacement for the 38: 4822:"Iron Curtain Successful in Firing Tests" 4505: 4503: 4501: 3058: 3056: 2661:"4th GCV team withdraws from competition" 2191:"Army Vague on New Ground Combat Vehicle" 1613: 1503:, tracked South Korean Army troop carrier 1430:, wheeled U.S. Marine Corps troop carrier 4990: 4744: 4742: 4740: 4661:"BAE-Northrop GCV Hybrid Drive A Gamble" 4562: 4560: 3544: 2524:. National Journal Group. Archived from 2335:"U.S. Army Delays Ground Combat Vehicle" 2302: 2300: 733:was planned to replace already requires 4966:- Militaryaerospace.com, 18 August 2014 4947:- Defensemedianetwork.com, 25 July 2014 3265:"Odierno: GCV in Danger of Cancelation" 3065:"Army: GCV Needs to Be Big and Tracked" 2458:"$ 200 BILLION IN ILLUSTRATIVE SAVINGS" 2031: 2029: 1974: 1972: 1727:. Watertown Daily Times. Archived from 1523: 787:XM30 Mechanized Infantry Combat Vehicle 4978:- Armyrecognition.com, 9 November 2013 4323:US-Israeli Team To Demo APS for Canada 4172: 4170: 3853:Censer, Marjorie (14 September 2009). 3564:, AOL, 8 November 2012, archived from 3527: 3516: 3209: 2973: 2971: 1626:Schafer, Susanne M. (9 October 1992). 1507:VĂ©hicule BlindĂ© de Combat d'Infanterie 1497:, tracked Singapore Army troop carrier 161:to move forward with the GCV program. 5191:XM501 Non-Line-of-Sight Launch System 5092:(Report). Congressional Budget Office 5014:Jane's Armour and Artillery 2011–2012 4600:Andrea Shalal-Esa (22 October 2010). 3834:from the original on 21 December 2023 3803:from the original on 25 December 2023 3132:from the original on 24 February 2013 2613:from the original on 6 September 2017 2158:Chavanne, Bettina (4 December 2009). 1885:Nelson, Margaret (25 November 2009). 1653:MacRae, Catherine (14 October 1999). 1491:, a wheeled German Army troop carrier 7: 5201:XM1216 Small Unmanned Ground Vehicle 4919:from the original on 10 January 2023 4889:from the original on 11 January 2023 4608:from the original on 25 October 2010 4406:from the original on 10 January 2023 4347:from the original on 10 January 2023 4266:Gourley, Scott R. (18 August 2013). 4114:. Lance & Shield. Archived from 3902:. Lance & Shield. Archived from 3873:from the original on 10 January 2023 3772:from the original on 22 January 2022 3629:from the original on 10 January 2023 3598:from the original on 3 December 2013 3394:from the original on 11 January 2023 3363:from the original on 10 January 2023 3275:from the original on 11 January 2023 3171:from the original on 10 January 2023 3071:from the original on 25 January 2021 3041:from the original on 10 January 2023 2872:from the original on 11 January 2023 2810:from the original on 6 November 2012 2731:from the original on 10 January 2023 2223:from the original on 14 January 2023 2075:from the original on 3 November 2012 1897:from the original on 2 December 2009 1839:from the original on 1 December 2009 1601: 1227:were working jointly on development. 887:The GCV was planned to be networked. 757:In February 2014, Defense Secretary 298:Vice Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army 4847:Insinna, Valerie (28 August 2013). 4690:from the original on 6 January 2023 4278:from the original on 6 January 2023 3791:Tressel, Ashley (12 October 2018). 3669:- Breakingdefense.com, 3 March 2014 3650:- Defensenews.com, 25 February 2014 3413:Bacon, Lance M. (15 January 2014). 3244:from the original on 28 August 2022 2917:Brannen, Kate (22 September 2010). 2640:from the original on 30 August 2010 2576:Brannen, Kate (22 September 2010). 2333:Bennett, John T. (25 August 2010). 2309:"Army delays Ground Combat Vehicle" 1832:United States Department of Defense 1451:, a wheeled U.S. Army troop carrier 558:were working jointly on development 405:The IFV schedule as of January 2010 5210:Follow On Incremental Capabilities 5032:Feickert, Andrew (14 March 2014). 4684:"BAE's GCV Weighs 53 Tons, Hybrid" 4425:Cox, Matthew (10 September 2009). 4325:- Defensenews.com, 15 October 2013 4221:from the original on 28 April 2011 4077:from the original on 28 April 2011 3933:from the original on 24 April 2010 3760:Mitchell, Ellen (31 August 2015). 3487:– Defensenews.com, 23 January 2014 3446:– Defensenews.com, 18 January 2014 3343:Bertuca, Tony (18 November 2013). 3090:Bertuca, Tony (10 December 2012). 2891:Brannen, Kate (15 February 2011). 2852:Tony, Bertuca (12 December 2011). 2395:Brannen, Kate (6 September 2010). 2189:Scutro, Andrew (10 January 2010). 2170:from the original on 29 April 2011 2160:"New Combat Vehicle for U.S. Army" 2007:Brannen, Kate (26 February 2010). 1979:Brannen, Kate (25 February 2010). 1943:Brannen, Kate (11 February 2010). 1924:from the original on 20 April 2010 1916:Jimmie Cummings (2 October 2009). 1461:Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle 1326:Larger, reconfigured Puma chassis. 1136:A concept image of a BAE contender 794:Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle 471:in 16 active and 8 National Guard 205:Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle 25: 4824:. Defense Update. 29 April 2013. 4372:. 13 October 2009. Archived from 3729:Roosevelt, Ann (19 August 2014). 3497:McLeary, Paul (28 January 2014). 3190:Hoffman, Michael (3 April 2013). 3151:Bertuca, Tony (21 January 2013). 2659:Brannen, Kate (18 January 2011). 2605:Chad Halcom (26 September 2010). 2497:from the original on 22 June 2011 2463:. 10 October 2010. Archived from 2426:Brannen, Kate (25 October 2010). 1303:Boeing would supply the weaponry. 602:Budget concerns and proposed cuts 262:program that year. The resulting 126:) was a program initiated by the 18:BCT Ground Combat Vehicle Program 5050: 4859:from the original on 18 May 2015 4828:from the original on 18 May 2022 4757:from the original on 25 May 2010 4725:from the original on 24 May 2010 4663:. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc 4567:Scott R. Gourley (August 2010). 4335:Osborn, Kris (30 October 2013). 3861:. Inside Washington Publishers. 3741:from the original on 2 July 2023 3456:Cox, Matthew (22 January 2014). 3312:McLeary, Paul (2 October 2013). 3008:from the original on 5 June 2015 2949:. 1 October 2010. Archived from 2776:Brannen, Kate (18 August 2011). 2750:Brannen, Kate (18 August 2011). 2692:from the original on 1 June 2012 2547:Brannen, Kate (5 October 2010). 2364:Brannen, Kate (27 August 2010). 2215:Halcom, Chad (7 February 2010). 2125:Cox, Matthew (1 February 2010). 1773:Cavallaro, Gina (11 June 2009). 1750:Daniel Wasserbly (28 May 2009). 1056:replacing the aging M2 Bradley. 688:Government Accountability Office 682:Some reports suggested that the 460:Government Accountability Office 49: 4811:- Gizmag.com, November 22, 2012 4209:White, Andrew (19 April 2010). 4065:White, Andrew (19 April 2010). 2829:Paul McLeary (29 August 2011). 2711:Bertuca, Tony (18 April 2011). 1455:XM1206 Infantry Carrier Vehicle 1275:Used active protection systems. 326:program were canceled with it. 5038:Congressional Research Service 4659:Michael Fabey (28 July 2010). 4630:Brannen, Kate (26 July 2010). 4460:. 21 July 2009. Archived from 4178:"Mounted Soldier System (MSS)" 3822:Roque, Ashley (26 June 2023). 3263:Sisk, Richard (30 July 2013). 3063:Cox, Matt (21 February 2013). 2632:Chad Halcom (27 August 2010). 2516:Megan Scully (4 August 2010). 2489:Roxana Tiron (6 August 2010). 1867:. October 2009. Archived from 1725:"McHugh nervous about changes" 1465:Next Generation Combat Vehicle 1449:M1126 infantry carrier vehicle 1443:Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle 1063:Brigades would have 62 IFV's, 692:Congressional Research Service 666:Funding cut and prioritization 304:hosts the second industry day. 201:Next Generation Combat Vehicle 197:M113 armored personnel carrier 153:. In 2011, the Army selected 1: 4240:Cox, Matthew (21 June 2010). 4211:"US Army delays GCV deadline" 4148:. August 2010. Archived from 4067:"US Army delays GCV deadline" 3927:"Army Wants Tough GCV Battle" 2094:Brannen, Kate (10 May 2010). 1723:Marc Heller (10 April 2009). 1422:Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle 1213:General Dynamics Land Systems 684:Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle 562:General Dynamics Land Systems 236:Armored Systems Modernization 193:Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle 159:General Dynamics Land Systems 5113:(Report). RAND Corporation. 4682:Colin Clark (28 July 2010). 4514:. National Journal Group Inc 4402:(Report). Rand Corporation. 3159:. Vol. 25, no. 3. 2996:Ashley Piper (21 May 2012). 2636:. Crain Communications Inc. 2609:. Crain Communications Inc. 2219:. Crain Communications Inc. 1799:Matthew Cox (10 June 2009). 1424:, U.S. Army M113 replacement 5290:United States Army projects 3967:. U.S. Army. Archived from 3925:Greg Grant (5 March 2010). 3688:- DoDBuzz.com, 4 March 2014 2067:Lori Grein (27 July 2010). 635:Congressional Budget Office 417:Low Rate Initial Production 354:Low Rate Initial Production 5321: 4753:. Shephard Group Limited. 4217:. Shephard Group Limited. 4183:. May 2010. Archived from 4073:. Shephard Group Limited. 1471:Future Rapid Effect System 1054:Heavy Brigade Combat Teams 839:technology readiness level 784: 589:(not awarded EMD contract) 473:Heavy Brigade Combat Teams 427:-sized arsenal in FY2019. 151:Heavy Brigade Combat Teams 102:Government Furnished E/I/M 55:Ground Combat Vehicle logo 26: 5196:Unattended Ground Sensors 5145:GCV on Defense-Update.com 5064:Hunnicutt, Richard Pearce 3301:. Gannett. 5 August 2013. 2985:. Gannett. 27 March 2012. 1632:Austin American-Statesman 1576:. Gannett. Archived from 1272:Used conventional diesel. 1111:Infantry fighting vehicle 1061:Heavy Brigade Combat Team 810:infantry fighting vehicle 722:rocket-propelled grenades 564:led a team that included 513:White Sands Missile Range 279:active protection systems 229:infantry fighting vehicle 189:Bradley Fighting Vehicles 136:infantry fighting vehicle 71:Place of origin 65:Infantry fighting vehicle 48: 36:Infantry fighting vehicle 4751:"GCV shortlist revealed" 4510:Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. 3707:- Army.mil, 4 March 2014 1428:Marine Personnel Carrier 959:anti-tank guided missile 577:led a team that include 247:U.S. Army Chief of Staff 132:armored fighting vehicle 4569:"Ground Combat Vehicle" 2979:"BAE Offers 70-ton GCV" 1434:Interim Armored Vehicle 1101:M113 family of vehicles 828:self-propelled howitzer 462:denied SAIC's protest. 269:The Army initiated the 260:Interim Armored Vehicle 256:operations short of war 5066:(15 September 2015) . 4962:20 August 2014 at the 4686:. Military Advantage. 4574:. AUSA. Archived from 3929:. Military Advantage. 3271:. Military Advantage. 2428:"Gen. Peter Chiarelli" 2071:. GlobalSecurity.org. 1137: 1095: 1020:Mounted Soldier System 945:Offensive capabilities 888: 847:Manned Ground Vehicles 504: 492: 406: 305: 275:Manned Ground Vehicles 182:Manned Ground Vehicles 100:Industry and US Army ( 43:Ground Combat Vehicle 5227:Ground Combat Vehicle 4272:Defense Media Network 1370:hybrid electric drive 1135: 1093: 1001:hit avoidance systems 886: 843:Future Combat Systems 583:Krauss-Maffei Wegmann 498: 486: 404: 332:request for proposals 316:Department of Defense 296: 271:Future Combat Systems 179:Future Combat Systems 175:Department of Defense 120:Ground Combat Vehicle 29:ground combat vehicle 5176:Future Force Warrior 4943:3 April 2015 at the 4807:27 July 2016 at the 4379:on 27 September 2012 3703:6 March 2014 at the 3684:6 March 2014 at the 3665:9 March 2014 at the 3594:, 27 November 2013, 2522:Government Executive 2285:on 28 September 2010 1754:. IHS Global Limited 932:C-17 Globemaster III 373:M1A2 SEP TUSK Abrams 309:Secretary of Defense 104:and synchronization) 5280:Military technology 5163:capability packages 5009:Foss, Christopher F 4915:. 22 January 2014. 4604:. Thomson Reuters. 4494:on 30 January 2016. 3623:Inside the Pentagon 3568:on 12 November 2012 3128:. 18 January 2013. 3126:Army Public Affairs 2470:on 19 November 2010 1067:would have 29, and 939:casualty evacuation 633:In April 2013, the 587:Rheinmetall Defence 447:cost-plus contracts 5244:XM1218 Countermine 5222:XM157 Class IV UAV 4885:. 27 August 2013. 4545:on 25 October 2012 4304:on 20 October 2013 4155:on 11 October 2010 4118:on 16 January 2010 3425:on 16 January 2014 3390:. Breaking Media. 3102:on 27 January 2013 2944:"GCV Industry Day" 2688:. 8 October 2010. 2438:on 22 January 2013 2254:"GCV PROGRAM PLAN" 2106:on 21 January 2013 2048:on 21 January 2013 1891:United States Army 1865:United States Army 1711:Pernin et al. 2012 1699:Pernin et al. 2012 1687:Pernin et al. 2012 1634:. Associated Press 1604:, p. 458–464. 1544:United States Army 1138: 1096: 999:and would utilize 889: 854:Peter W. Chiarelli 738:transport aircraft 609:War in Afghanistan 505: 493: 407: 336:cost-plus contract 306: 128:United States Army 92:Production history 5275:BCT Modernization 5260: 5259: 5253: 5246: 5239: 5217:Common Controller 5186:XM156 Class I UAV 5161:BCT Modernization 5077:978-1-62654-153-5 5024:978-0-71062-960-9 4721:(Press release). 4581:on 27 August 2010 4190:on 24 August 2010 4010:"Industry day #1" 3324:on 6 October 2013 2806:. Bloomberg L.P. 2528:on 26 August 2010 2259:. 29 January 2010 1874:on 30 April 2011. 1713:, p. 95-118. 1580:on 23 August 2014 1038:transparent armor 860:The IFV would be 735:strategic airlift 323:blue-ribbon panel 240:main battle tanks 116: 115: 16:(Redirected from 5312: 5251:XM1217 Transport 5249: 5242: 5235: 5156: 5121: 5119: 5112: 5101: 5099: 5097: 5091: 5081: 5054: 5053: 5049: 5047: 5045: 5028: 4994: 4988: 4979: 4973: 4967: 4954: 4948: 4935: 4929: 4928: 4926: 4924: 4905: 4899: 4898: 4896: 4894: 4883:Army Recognition 4875: 4869: 4868: 4866: 4864: 4853:National Defense 4844: 4838: 4837: 4835: 4833: 4818: 4812: 4799: 4793: 4792: 4790: 4788: 4773: 4767: 4766: 4764: 4762: 4746: 4735: 4734: 4732: 4730: 4711: 4700: 4699: 4697: 4695: 4679: 4673: 4672: 4670: 4668: 4656: 4647: 4646: 4644: 4642: 4627: 4618: 4617: 4615: 4613: 4597: 4591: 4590: 4588: 4586: 4580: 4573: 4564: 4555: 4554: 4552: 4550: 4535: 4524: 4523: 4521: 4519: 4507: 4496: 4495: 4480: 4474: 4473: 4471: 4469: 4450: 4444: 4443: 4441: 4439: 4422: 4416: 4415: 4413: 4411: 4395: 4389: 4388: 4386: 4384: 4378: 4371: 4363: 4357: 4356: 4354: 4352: 4332: 4326: 4320: 4314: 4313: 4311: 4309: 4294: 4288: 4287: 4285: 4283: 4263: 4257: 4256: 4254: 4252: 4237: 4231: 4230: 4228: 4226: 4206: 4200: 4199: 4197: 4195: 4189: 4182: 4174: 4165: 4164: 4162: 4160: 4154: 4147: 4139: 4128: 4127: 4125: 4123: 4104: 4087: 4086: 4084: 4082: 4062: 4056: 4055: 4053: 4051: 4046:on 16 March 2010 4042:. Archived from 4032: 4026: 4025: 4023: 4021: 4012:. Archived from 4005: 3984: 3983: 3981: 3979: 3974:on 30 April 2011 3973: 3966: 3958: 3943: 3942: 3940: 3938: 3922: 3916: 3915: 3913: 3911: 3906:on 16 March 2010 3892: 3883: 3882: 3880: 3878: 3850: 3844: 3843: 3841: 3839: 3828:Breaking Defense 3819: 3813: 3812: 3810: 3808: 3788: 3782: 3781: 3779: 3777: 3757: 3751: 3750: 3748: 3746: 3726: 3720: 3714: 3708: 3695: 3689: 3676: 3670: 3657: 3651: 3645: 3639: 3638: 3636: 3634: 3614: 3608: 3606: 3605: 3603: 3592:Breaking defense 3584: 3578: 3576: 3575: 3573: 3554: 3548: 3542: 3536: 3535: 3529: 3524: 3522: 3514: 3512: 3510: 3494: 3488: 3482: 3473: 3472: 3470: 3468: 3453: 3447: 3441: 3435: 3434: 3432: 3430: 3421:. Archived from 3410: 3404: 3403: 3401: 3399: 3388:Breaking Defense 3379: 3373: 3372: 3370: 3368: 3340: 3334: 3333: 3331: 3329: 3309: 3303: 3302: 3291: 3285: 3284: 3282: 3280: 3260: 3254: 3253: 3251: 3249: 3243: 3236: 3228: 3222: 3221: 3215: 3207: 3205: 3203: 3187: 3181: 3180: 3178: 3176: 3148: 3142: 3141: 3139: 3137: 3118: 3112: 3111: 3109: 3107: 3087: 3081: 3080: 3078: 3076: 3060: 3051: 3050: 3048: 3046: 3037:. 4 April 2013. 3027: 3018: 3017: 3015: 3013: 2993: 2987: 2986: 2975: 2966: 2965: 2963: 2961: 2955: 2948: 2940: 2934: 2933: 2931: 2929: 2914: 2908: 2907: 2905: 2903: 2888: 2882: 2881: 2879: 2877: 2849: 2843: 2842: 2840: 2838: 2826: 2820: 2819: 2817: 2815: 2799: 2793: 2792: 2790: 2788: 2773: 2767: 2766: 2764: 2762: 2747: 2741: 2740: 2738: 2736: 2708: 2702: 2701: 2699: 2697: 2682: 2676: 2675: 2673: 2671: 2656: 2650: 2649: 2647: 2645: 2629: 2623: 2622: 2620: 2618: 2602: 2593: 2592: 2590: 2588: 2573: 2564: 2563: 2561: 2559: 2544: 2538: 2537: 2535: 2533: 2513: 2507: 2506: 2504: 2502: 2486: 2480: 2479: 2477: 2475: 2469: 2462: 2454: 2448: 2447: 2445: 2443: 2434:. Archived from 2423: 2417: 2416: 2414: 2412: 2403:. Archived from 2392: 2386: 2385: 2383: 2381: 2372:. Archived from 2361: 2355: 2354: 2352: 2350: 2341:. Archived from 2330: 2324: 2323: 2321: 2319: 2304: 2295: 2294: 2292: 2290: 2275: 2269: 2268: 2266: 2264: 2258: 2250: 2233: 2232: 2230: 2228: 2212: 2206: 2205: 2203: 2201: 2186: 2180: 2179: 2177: 2175: 2155: 2142: 2141: 2139: 2137: 2122: 2116: 2115: 2113: 2111: 2102:. Archived from 2091: 2085: 2084: 2082: 2080: 2064: 2058: 2057: 2055: 2053: 2044:. Archived from 2033: 2024: 2023: 2021: 2019: 2004: 1998: 1997: 1995: 1993: 1976: 1967: 1966: 1964: 1962: 1953:. Archived from 1940: 1934: 1933: 1931: 1929: 1913: 1907: 1906: 1904: 1902: 1882: 1876: 1875: 1873: 1862: 1854: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1844: 1822: 1816: 1815: 1813: 1811: 1796: 1790: 1789: 1787: 1785: 1770: 1764: 1763: 1761: 1759: 1747: 1741: 1740: 1738: 1736: 1731:on 22 March 2012 1720: 1714: 1708: 1702: 1696: 1690: 1684: 1678: 1677: 1675: 1673: 1650: 1644: 1643: 1641: 1639: 1623: 1617: 1611: 1605: 1599: 1590: 1589: 1587: 1585: 1568:McCleary, Paul. 1565: 1556: 1555: 1553: 1551: 1541: 1533: 1389:General Dynamics 1073:forward observer 910:Electrical power 817:main battle tank 613:General Dynamics 550:North America, 544:Northrop Grumman 376:main battle tank 321:In June 2009, a 53: 44: 39: 21: 5320: 5319: 5315: 5314: 5313: 5311: 5310: 5309: 5265: 5264: 5261: 5256: 5205: 5164: 5129: 5124: 5117: 5110: 5104: 5095: 5093: 5089: 5084: 5078: 5062: 5051: 5043: 5041: 5031: 5025: 5007: 5003: 4998: 4997: 4989: 4982: 4974: 4970: 4964:Wayback Machine 4955: 4951: 4945:Wayback Machine 4936: 4932: 4922: 4920: 4907: 4906: 4902: 4892: 4890: 4877: 4876: 4872: 4862: 4860: 4846: 4845: 4841: 4831: 4829: 4820: 4819: 4815: 4809:Wayback Machine 4800: 4796: 4786: 4784: 4775: 4774: 4770: 4760: 4758: 4749:White, Andrew. 4748: 4747: 4738: 4728: 4726: 4713: 4712: 4703: 4693: 4691: 4681: 4680: 4676: 4666: 4664: 4658: 4657: 4650: 4640: 4638: 4629: 4628: 4621: 4611: 4609: 4599: 4598: 4594: 4584: 4582: 4578: 4571: 4566: 4565: 4558: 4548: 4546: 4537: 4536: 4527: 4517: 4515: 4509: 4508: 4499: 4482: 4481: 4477: 4467: 4465: 4452: 4451: 4447: 4437: 4435: 4424: 4423: 4419: 4409: 4407: 4397: 4396: 4392: 4382: 4380: 4376: 4369: 4365: 4364: 4360: 4350: 4348: 4334: 4333: 4329: 4321: 4317: 4307: 4305: 4296: 4295: 4291: 4281: 4279: 4265: 4264: 4260: 4250: 4248: 4239: 4238: 4234: 4224: 4222: 4208: 4207: 4203: 4193: 4191: 4187: 4180: 4176: 4175: 4168: 4158: 4156: 4152: 4145: 4141: 4140: 4131: 4121: 4119: 4106: 4105: 4090: 4080: 4078: 4064: 4063: 4059: 4049: 4047: 4034: 4033: 4029: 4019: 4017: 4016:on 22 July 2011 4007: 4006: 3987: 3977: 3975: 3971: 3964: 3960: 3959: 3946: 3936: 3934: 3924: 3923: 3919: 3909: 3907: 3894: 3893: 3886: 3876: 3874: 3859:Inside the Army 3852: 3851: 3847: 3837: 3835: 3821: 3820: 3816: 3806: 3804: 3790: 3789: 3785: 3775: 3773: 3759: 3758: 3754: 3744: 3742: 3728: 3727: 3723: 3715: 3711: 3705:Wayback Machine 3696: 3692: 3686:Wayback Machine 3677: 3673: 3667:Wayback Machine 3658: 3654: 3646: 3642: 3632: 3630: 3616: 3615: 3611: 3601: 3599: 3586: 3585: 3581: 3571: 3569: 3556: 3555: 3551: 3543: 3539: 3525: 3515: 3508: 3506: 3496: 3495: 3491: 3483: 3476: 3466: 3464: 3455: 3454: 3450: 3442: 3438: 3428: 3426: 3412: 3411: 3407: 3397: 3395: 3381: 3380: 3376: 3366: 3364: 3349:Inside the Army 3342: 3341: 3337: 3327: 3325: 3311: 3310: 3306: 3293: 3292: 3288: 3278: 3276: 3262: 3261: 3257: 3247: 3245: 3241: 3234: 3230: 3229: 3225: 3208: 3201: 3199: 3189: 3188: 3184: 3174: 3172: 3157:Inside the Army 3150: 3149: 3145: 3135: 3133: 3120: 3119: 3115: 3105: 3103: 3096:Inside the Army 3089: 3088: 3084: 3074: 3072: 3067:. DefenseTech. 3062: 3061: 3054: 3044: 3042: 3029: 3028: 3021: 3011: 3009: 2995: 2994: 2990: 2977: 2976: 2969: 2959: 2957: 2956:on 22 July 2011 2953: 2946: 2942: 2941: 2937: 2927: 2925: 2916: 2915: 2911: 2901: 2899: 2890: 2889: 2885: 2875: 2873: 2858:Inside the Army 2851: 2850: 2846: 2836: 2834: 2833:. Bloomberg L.P 2828: 2827: 2823: 2813: 2811: 2801: 2800: 2796: 2786: 2784: 2775: 2774: 2770: 2760: 2758: 2749: 2748: 2744: 2734: 2732: 2717:Inside the Army 2710: 2709: 2705: 2695: 2693: 2684: 2683: 2679: 2669: 2667: 2658: 2657: 2653: 2643: 2641: 2631: 2630: 2626: 2616: 2614: 2604: 2603: 2596: 2586: 2584: 2575: 2574: 2567: 2557: 2555: 2546: 2545: 2541: 2531: 2529: 2515: 2514: 2510: 2500: 2498: 2488: 2487: 2483: 2473: 2471: 2467: 2460: 2456: 2455: 2451: 2441: 2439: 2425: 2424: 2420: 2410: 2408: 2407:on 23 July 2012 2394: 2393: 2389: 2379: 2377: 2376:on 30 July 2012 2363: 2362: 2358: 2348: 2346: 2345:on 30 July 2012 2332: 2331: 2327: 2317: 2315: 2306: 2305: 2298: 2288: 2286: 2277: 2276: 2272: 2262: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2251: 2236: 2226: 2224: 2214: 2213: 2209: 2199: 2197: 2188: 2187: 2183: 2173: 2171: 2157: 2156: 2145: 2135: 2133: 2124: 2123: 2119: 2109: 2107: 2093: 2092: 2088: 2078: 2076: 2066: 2065: 2061: 2051: 2049: 2036:Brannen, Kate. 2035: 2034: 2027: 2017: 2015: 2006: 2005: 2001: 1991: 1989: 1978: 1977: 1970: 1960: 1958: 1957:on 29 July 2012 1942: 1941: 1937: 1927: 1925: 1915: 1914: 1910: 1900: 1898: 1884: 1883: 1879: 1871: 1860: 1856: 1855: 1851: 1842: 1840: 1824: 1823: 1819: 1809: 1807: 1798: 1797: 1793: 1783: 1781: 1772: 1771: 1767: 1757: 1755: 1749: 1748: 1744: 1734: 1732: 1722: 1721: 1717: 1709: 1705: 1697: 1693: 1685: 1681: 1671: 1669: 1659:Inside the Army 1652: 1651: 1647: 1637: 1635: 1625: 1624: 1620: 1612: 1608: 1600: 1593: 1583: 1581: 1567: 1566: 1559: 1549: 1547: 1546:. 15 March 2009 1539: 1535: 1534: 1525: 1520: 1413: 1400: 1391: 1365: 1217:Lockheed Martin 1122: 1113: 1088: 1050: 993: 991:Countermeasures 947: 920: 912: 881: 806: 789: 783: 755: 713: 668: 631: 622: 604: 566:Lockheed Martin 436: 434:Revised program 387:Peter Chiarelli 346:project manager 302:Peter Chiarelli 291: 289:Initial program 218: 213: 138:to replace the 84:In service 79:Service history 56: 42: 37: 32: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 5318: 5316: 5308: 5307: 5302: 5297: 5292: 5287: 5282: 5277: 5267: 5266: 5258: 5257: 5255: 5254: 5247: 5240: 5229: 5224: 5219: 5213: 5211: 5207: 5206: 5204: 5203: 5198: 5193: 5188: 5183: 5178: 5172: 5170: 5166: 5165: 5159: 5153: 5152: 5147: 5142: 5137: 5128: 5127:External links 5125: 5123: 5122: 5102: 5082: 5076: 5060: 5029: 5023: 5004: 5002: 4999: 4996: 4995: 4980: 4968: 4949: 4930: 4900: 4870: 4839: 4813: 4794: 4783:on 9 July 2011 4768: 4736: 4701: 4674: 4648: 4619: 4592: 4556: 4525: 4497: 4475: 4445: 4417: 4390: 4358: 4327: 4315: 4289: 4258: 4232: 4201: 4166: 4129: 4112:Defense Update 4088: 4057: 4040:Defense Update 4027: 3985: 3944: 3917: 3900:Defense Update 3884: 3845: 3814: 3797:Inside Defense 3783: 3766:Inside Defense 3752: 3721: 3709: 3690: 3671: 3652: 3640: 3609: 3579: 3549: 3537: 3503:Military Times 3489: 3474: 3448: 3436: 3419:Military Times 3405: 3374: 3335: 3304: 3286: 3255: 3223: 3182: 3143: 3113: 3082: 3052: 3019: 2988: 2967: 2935: 2909: 2883: 2844: 2821: 2794: 2768: 2742: 2703: 2677: 2651: 2624: 2594: 2565: 2539: 2508: 2481: 2449: 2418: 2387: 2356: 2325: 2296: 2270: 2234: 2207: 2181: 2143: 2117: 2086: 2059: 2025: 1999: 1968: 1935: 1908: 1877: 1849: 1817: 1791: 1765: 1742: 1715: 1703: 1691: 1679: 1645: 1618: 1616:, p. 298. 1614:Hunnicutt 2015 1606: 1591: 1557: 1522: 1521: 1519: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1504: 1498: 1492: 1486: 1480: 1474: 1468: 1458: 1452: 1446: 1440: 1431: 1425: 1418: 1417: 1412: 1409: 1399: 1396: 1390: 1387: 1364: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1349: 1348: 1340: 1339: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1327: 1321: 1320: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1304: 1301: 1295: 1294: 1292:Work breakdown 1286: 1285: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1273: 1267: 1266: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1250: 1247: 1244: 1238: 1237: 1235:Work breakdown 1229: 1228: 1221:Detroit Diesel 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1201: 1194: 1193:Manned turret. 1191: 1188: 1182: 1181: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1165: 1162: 1159: 1153: 1152: 1150:Work breakdown 1144: 1143: 1127: 1126: 1121: 1118: 1112: 1109: 1094:A notional GCV 1087: 1084: 1049: 1046: 1015:requirements. 992: 989: 975:armor-piercing 955:coaxial weapon 946: 943: 928:C-130 Hercules 919: 916: 911: 908: 880: 877: 805: 802: 785:Main article: 782: 779: 754: 751: 730:V-shaped hulls 712: 709: 667: 664: 659: 658: 654: 647: 643: 630: 627: 621: 618: 603: 600: 596: 595: 591: 590: 572: 559: 533: 532: 481: 480: 468: 467: 435: 432: 399: 398: 290: 287: 217: 214: 212: 209: 148:National Guard 114: 113: 110: 106: 105: 98: 94: 93: 89: 88: 85: 81: 80: 76: 75: 72: 68: 67: 62: 58: 57: 54: 46: 45: 35: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5317: 5306: 5303: 5301: 5298: 5296: 5293: 5291: 5288: 5286: 5283: 5281: 5278: 5276: 5273: 5272: 5270: 5263: 5252: 5248: 5245: 5241: 5238: 5233: 5230: 5228: 5225: 5223: 5220: 5218: 5215: 5214: 5212: 5208: 5202: 5199: 5197: 5194: 5192: 5189: 5187: 5184: 5182: 5179: 5177: 5174: 5173: 5171: 5167: 5162: 5157: 5151: 5148: 5146: 5143: 5141: 5138: 5136: 5135: 5131: 5130: 5126: 5116: 5109: 5103: 5088: 5083: 5079: 5073: 5069: 5065: 5061: 5058: 5057:public domain 5039: 5035: 5030: 5026: 5020: 5016: 5015: 5010: 5006: 5005: 5000: 4993:, p. 12. 4992: 4991:Feickert 2014 4987: 4985: 4981: 4977: 4972: 4969: 4965: 4961: 4958: 4953: 4950: 4946: 4942: 4939: 4934: 4931: 4918: 4914: 4910: 4904: 4901: 4888: 4884: 4880: 4874: 4871: 4858: 4854: 4850: 4843: 4840: 4827: 4823: 4817: 4814: 4810: 4806: 4803: 4798: 4795: 4782: 4778: 4772: 4769: 4756: 4752: 4745: 4743: 4741: 4737: 4724: 4720: 4716: 4710: 4708: 4706: 4702: 4689: 4685: 4678: 4675: 4662: 4655: 4653: 4649: 4637: 4633: 4626: 4624: 4620: 4607: 4603: 4596: 4593: 4577: 4570: 4563: 4561: 4557: 4544: 4540: 4534: 4532: 4530: 4526: 4513: 4506: 4504: 4502: 4498: 4493: 4489: 4485: 4479: 4476: 4464:on 1 May 2011 4463: 4459: 4455: 4449: 4446: 4434: 4433: 4428: 4421: 4418: 4405: 4401: 4394: 4391: 4375: 4368: 4362: 4359: 4346: 4342: 4338: 4331: 4328: 4324: 4319: 4316: 4303: 4299: 4293: 4290: 4277: 4273: 4269: 4262: 4259: 4247: 4243: 4236: 4233: 4220: 4216: 4212: 4205: 4202: 4186: 4179: 4173: 4171: 4167: 4151: 4144: 4138: 4136: 4134: 4130: 4117: 4113: 4109: 4103: 4101: 4099: 4097: 4095: 4093: 4089: 4076: 4072: 4068: 4061: 4058: 4045: 4041: 4037: 4031: 4028: 4015: 4011: 4004: 4002: 4000: 3998: 3996: 3994: 3992: 3990: 3986: 3970: 3963: 3957: 3955: 3953: 3951: 3949: 3945: 3932: 3928: 3921: 3918: 3905: 3901: 3897: 3891: 3889: 3885: 3872: 3868: 3864: 3860: 3856: 3849: 3846: 3833: 3829: 3825: 3818: 3815: 3802: 3798: 3794: 3787: 3784: 3771: 3767: 3763: 3756: 3753: 3740: 3736: 3735:Defense Daily 3732: 3725: 3722: 3718: 3713: 3710: 3706: 3702: 3699: 3694: 3691: 3687: 3683: 3680: 3675: 3672: 3668: 3664: 3661: 3656: 3653: 3649: 3644: 3641: 3628: 3624: 3620: 3613: 3610: 3597: 3593: 3589: 3583: 3580: 3567: 3563: 3559: 3553: 3550: 3546: 3545:Feickert 2014 3541: 3538: 3533: 3520: 3504: 3500: 3493: 3490: 3486: 3481: 3479: 3475: 3463: 3459: 3452: 3449: 3445: 3440: 3437: 3424: 3420: 3416: 3409: 3406: 3393: 3389: 3385: 3378: 3375: 3362: 3358: 3354: 3350: 3346: 3339: 3336: 3323: 3319: 3315: 3308: 3305: 3300: 3296: 3290: 3287: 3274: 3270: 3266: 3259: 3256: 3240: 3233: 3227: 3224: 3219: 3213: 3197: 3193: 3186: 3183: 3170: 3166: 3162: 3158: 3154: 3147: 3144: 3131: 3127: 3123: 3117: 3114: 3101: 3097: 3093: 3086: 3083: 3070: 3066: 3059: 3057: 3053: 3040: 3036: 3032: 3026: 3024: 3020: 3007: 3003: 2999: 2992: 2989: 2984: 2980: 2974: 2972: 2968: 2952: 2945: 2939: 2936: 2924: 2920: 2913: 2910: 2898: 2894: 2887: 2884: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2859: 2855: 2848: 2845: 2832: 2825: 2822: 2809: 2805: 2798: 2795: 2783: 2779: 2772: 2769: 2757: 2753: 2746: 2743: 2730: 2726: 2722: 2718: 2714: 2707: 2704: 2691: 2687: 2681: 2678: 2666: 2662: 2655: 2652: 2639: 2635: 2628: 2625: 2612: 2608: 2601: 2599: 2595: 2583: 2579: 2572: 2570: 2566: 2554: 2550: 2543: 2540: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2512: 2509: 2496: 2492: 2485: 2482: 2466: 2459: 2453: 2450: 2437: 2433: 2429: 2422: 2419: 2406: 2402: 2398: 2391: 2388: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2360: 2357: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2329: 2326: 2314: 2310: 2303: 2301: 2297: 2284: 2280: 2274: 2271: 2255: 2249: 2247: 2245: 2243: 2241: 2239: 2235: 2222: 2218: 2211: 2208: 2196: 2192: 2185: 2182: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2154: 2152: 2150: 2148: 2144: 2132: 2128: 2121: 2118: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2090: 2087: 2074: 2070: 2063: 2060: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2032: 2030: 2026: 2014: 2010: 2003: 2000: 1988: 1987: 1982: 1975: 1973: 1969: 1956: 1952: 1951: 1946: 1939: 1936: 1923: 1919: 1912: 1909: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1881: 1878: 1870: 1866: 1859: 1853: 1850: 1838: 1834: 1833: 1828: 1821: 1818: 1806: 1802: 1795: 1792: 1780: 1776: 1769: 1766: 1753: 1746: 1743: 1730: 1726: 1719: 1716: 1712: 1707: 1704: 1701:, p. 69. 1700: 1695: 1692: 1689:, p. 24. 1688: 1683: 1680: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1649: 1646: 1633: 1629: 1622: 1619: 1615: 1610: 1607: 1603: 1598: 1596: 1592: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1564: 1562: 1558: 1545: 1538: 1532: 1530: 1528: 1524: 1517: 1513:troop carrier 1512: 1508: 1505: 1502: 1499: 1496: 1493: 1490: 1487: 1484: 1481: 1478: 1475: 1472: 1469: 1466: 1462: 1459: 1456: 1453: 1450: 1447: 1444: 1441: 1439: 1435: 1432: 1429: 1426: 1423: 1420: 1419: 1415: 1414: 1410: 1408: 1404: 1397: 1395: 1388: 1386: 1382: 1380: 1375: 1371: 1362: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1347: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1337: 1336: 1328: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1319: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1305: 1302: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1293: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1283: 1282: 1274: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1265: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1251: 1248: 1245: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1236: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1211: 1210: 1202: 1199: 1195: 1192: 1189: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1180: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1166: 1163: 1160: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1151: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1140: 1139: 1134: 1130: 1124: 1123: 1119: 1117: 1110: 1108: 1106: 1102: 1092: 1085: 1083: 1081: 1076: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1057: 1055: 1047: 1045: 1042: 1039: 1034: 1032: 1028: 1023: 1021: 1016: 1013: 1009: 1006: 1002: 998: 990: 988: 986: 981: 976: 972: 968: 963: 960: 956: 952: 944: 942: 940: 935: 933: 929: 925: 917: 915: 909: 907: 904: 902: 898: 894: 885: 878: 876: 872: 869: 867: 863: 858: 855: 852:Army General 850: 848: 844: 840: 835: 833: 829: 826: 822: 818: 815: 811: 803: 801: 799: 795: 788: 780: 778: 774: 772: 767: 764: 760: 752: 750: 747: 741: 739: 736: 731: 727: 723: 719: 711:Weight issues 710: 708: 704: 700: 696: 693: 689: 685: 680: 677: 673: 665: 663: 655: 652: 649:Purchase the 648: 644: 640: 639: 638: 636: 628: 626: 619: 617: 614: 610: 601: 599: 593: 592: 588: 584: 580: 576: 573: 571: 567: 563: 560: 557: 553: 549: 545: 541: 538: 537: 536: 530: 529: 528: 526: 522: 518: 514: 510: 502: 497: 490: 485: 478: 477: 476: 474: 465: 464: 463: 461: 457: 453: 448: 443: 440: 433: 431: 428: 426: 422: 418: 413: 410: 403: 396: 395: 394: 392: 388: 385: 379: 377: 374: 370: 369:M1126 Stryker 366: 362: 357: 355: 349: 347: 342: 339: 337: 333: 327: 324: 319: 317: 313: 310: 303: 299: 295: 288: 286: 284: 280: 276: 272: 267: 265: 261: 257: 252: 251:Eric Shinseki 248: 243: 241: 237: 232: 230: 227: 223: 215: 210: 208: 206: 202: 198: 194: 190: 185: 183: 180: 176: 170: 168: 162: 160: 156: 152: 149: 143: 141: 137: 133: 129: 125: 121: 111: 107: 103: 99: 95: 90: 86: 82: 77: 74:United States 73: 69: 66: 63: 59: 52: 47: 40: 34: 30: 19: 5262: 5226: 5133: 5096:20 September 5094:. Retrieved 5067: 5042:. Retrieved 5037: 5013: 5001:Bibliography 4971: 4952: 4933: 4921:. Retrieved 4913:Military.com 4912: 4903: 4891:. Retrieved 4882: 4873: 4861:. Retrieved 4852: 4842: 4830:. Retrieved 4816: 4797: 4785:. Retrieved 4781:the original 4771: 4759:. Retrieved 4727:. Retrieved 4718: 4692:. Retrieved 4677: 4665:. Retrieved 4639:. Retrieved 4635: 4610:. Retrieved 4595: 4583:. Retrieved 4576:the original 4547:. Retrieved 4543:the original 4516:. Retrieved 4492:the original 4488:BusinessWeek 4487: 4478: 4466:. Retrieved 4462:the original 4457: 4448: 4436:. Retrieved 4432:Defense News 4430: 4420: 4408:. Retrieved 4393: 4383:20 September 4381:. Retrieved 4374:the original 4361: 4349:. Retrieved 4341:Military.com 4340: 4330: 4318: 4306:. Retrieved 4302:the original 4292: 4280:. Retrieved 4271: 4261: 4249:. Retrieved 4245: 4235: 4223:. Retrieved 4214: 4204: 4192:. Retrieved 4185:the original 4157:. Retrieved 4150:the original 4120:. Retrieved 4116:the original 4111: 4079:. Retrieved 4070: 4060: 4048:. Retrieved 4044:the original 4039: 4030: 4020:19 September 4018:. Retrieved 4014:the original 3976:. Retrieved 3969:the original 3935:. Retrieved 3920: 3908:. Retrieved 3904:the original 3899: 3875:. Retrieved 3858: 3848: 3836:. Retrieved 3827: 3817: 3805:. Retrieved 3796: 3786: 3774:. Retrieved 3765: 3755: 3743:. Retrieved 3734: 3724: 3712: 3693: 3674: 3655: 3643: 3631:. Retrieved 3622: 3612: 3600:, retrieved 3591: 3582: 3570:, retrieved 3566:the original 3561: 3552: 3547:, p. 9. 3540: 3507:. Retrieved 3502: 3492: 3465:. Retrieved 3462:Military.com 3461: 3451: 3439: 3427:. Retrieved 3423:the original 3418: 3408: 3396:. Retrieved 3387: 3377: 3365:. Retrieved 3348: 3338: 3326:. Retrieved 3322:the original 3318:Defense News 3317: 3307: 3298: 3289: 3277:. Retrieved 3269:Military.com 3268: 3258: 3246:. Retrieved 3226: 3200:. Retrieved 3195: 3185: 3173:. Retrieved 3156: 3146: 3134:. Retrieved 3125: 3116: 3104:. Retrieved 3100:the original 3095: 3085: 3073:. Retrieved 3043:. Retrieved 3035:Military.com 3034: 3010:. Retrieved 3001: 2991: 2982: 2958:. Retrieved 2951:the original 2938: 2928:22 September 2926:. Retrieved 2923:Defense News 2922: 2912: 2900:. Retrieved 2896: 2886: 2874:. Retrieved 2857: 2847: 2837:11 September 2835:. Retrieved 2824: 2814:11 September 2812:. Retrieved 2797: 2787:11 September 2785:. Retrieved 2781: 2771: 2761:11 September 2759:. Retrieved 2755: 2745: 2733:. Retrieved 2716: 2706: 2694:. Retrieved 2680: 2668:. Retrieved 2664: 2654: 2642:. Retrieved 2627: 2617:27 September 2615:. Retrieved 2587:23 September 2585:. Retrieved 2582:Defense News 2581: 2556:. Retrieved 2553:Defense News 2552: 2542: 2530:. Retrieved 2526:the original 2521: 2511: 2499:. Retrieved 2484: 2472:. Retrieved 2465:the original 2452: 2440:. Retrieved 2436:the original 2431: 2421: 2411:20 September 2409:. Retrieved 2405:the original 2401:Defense News 2400: 2390: 2380:20 September 2378:. Retrieved 2374:the original 2370:Defense News 2369: 2359: 2349:20 September 2347:. Retrieved 2343:the original 2339:Defense News 2338: 2328: 2316:. Retrieved 2312: 2287:. Retrieved 2283:the original 2273: 2261:. Retrieved 2225:. Retrieved 2210: 2198:. Retrieved 2194: 2184: 2172:. Retrieved 2164:Aviationweek 2163: 2134:. Retrieved 2130: 2120: 2108:. Retrieved 2104:the original 2100:Defense News 2099: 2089: 2077:. Retrieved 2062: 2050:. Retrieved 2046:the original 2041: 2016:. Retrieved 2012: 2002: 1990:. Retrieved 1986:Defense News 1984: 1959:. Retrieved 1955:the original 1950:Defense News 1948: 1938: 1926:. Retrieved 1911: 1899:. Retrieved 1890: 1880: 1869:the original 1864: 1852: 1841:, retrieved 1830: 1820: 1808:. Retrieved 1804: 1794: 1782:. Retrieved 1778: 1768: 1756:. Retrieved 1745: 1733:. Retrieved 1729:the original 1718: 1706: 1694: 1682: 1670:. Retrieved 1658: 1648: 1636:. Retrieved 1631: 1621: 1609: 1582:. Retrieved 1578:the original 1574:Defense News 1573: 1548:. Retrieved 1543: 1509:, a wheeled 1405: 1401: 1392: 1383: 1366: 1345: 1317: 1291: 1263: 1234: 1196:Leveraged a 1178: 1149: 1128: 1114: 1097: 1077: 1058: 1051: 1043: 1035: 1024: 1017: 1008:Iron Curtain 994: 964: 948: 936: 921: 913: 905: 892: 890: 873: 870: 859: 851: 836: 825:M109 Paladin 823:IFV and the 807: 790: 775: 771:M109 Paladin 768: 756: 742: 714: 705: 701: 697: 681: 669: 660: 632: 623: 605: 597: 534: 517:M2A3 Bradley 506: 469: 445:Up to three 444: 441: 437: 429: 414: 411: 408: 380: 361:M2A3 Bradley 358: 350: 343: 340: 328: 320: 312:Robert Gates 307: 268: 244: 233: 219: 186: 171: 163: 144: 123: 119: 117: 33: 4719:PR Newswire 4438:13 December 3978:14 December 3572:13 November 3075:26 February 2960:13 November 2902:15 February 2474:11 November 1992:25 February 1961:11 February 1901:25 November 1843:13 November 1784:14 December 1638:18 November 1511:French Army 1398:SAIC–Boeing 1363:BAE Systems 1125:Competitors 1120:Competitors 985:Mk 44 Mod 1 901:BCT Soldier 897:BCT Network 798:Rheinmetall 759:Chuck Hagel 753:Termination 676:Chuck Hagel 672:Ray Odierno 594:Milestone C 540:BAE Systems 531:Competitors 479:Milestone A 466:Projections 454:and German 397:Projections 211:Development 155:BAE Systems 5269:Categories 5237:XM1219 ARV 5140:TACOM page 4923:10 January 4893:11 January 4863:11 January 4636:Army Times 4612:23 October 4468:27 January 4410:10 January 4351:10 January 4308:29 January 4282:10 January 4246:Army Times 4122:26 January 4008:Kash, MT. 3877:10 January 3807:21 January 3776:22 January 3745:22 January 3633:10 January 3528:|url= 3429:15 January 3398:11 January 3367:10 January 3328:11 January 3299:Army Times 3279:11 January 3248:10 January 3202:10 January 3175:10 January 3136:22 January 3106:10 January 3045:10 January 2983:Army Times 2897:Army Times 2876:11 January 2782:Army Times 2756:Army Times 2735:10 January 2696:16 October 2670:19 January 2665:Army Times 2558:26 October 2442:24 October 2432:Army Times 2313:Army Times 2289:12 January 2227:8 February 2200:26 January 2195:Army Times 2174:8 December 2136:2 February 2131:Army Times 2042:Army Times 2013:Army Times 1805:Army Times 1779:Army Times 1672:7 February 1518:References 1495:Bionix AFV 1065:battalions 1027:obscurants 951:autocannon 821:M2 Bradley 763:Heidi Shyu 629:CBO report 552:Saft Group 509:Fort Bliss 226:M2 Bradley 216:Background 140:M2 Bradley 4694:6 January 4585:21 August 4251:16 August 4159:17 August 3937:11 August 3519:cite news 3212:cite news 3002:Army News 2644:30 August 2318:26 August 2079:11 August 2018:1 October 1928:11 August 1810:20 August 1602:Foss 2011 1489:GTK Boxer 1142:dollars". 1080:fireteams 1041:control. 1005:Artis LLC 957:, and an 866:networked 814:M1 Abrams 718:M1 Abrams 489:Namer APC 421:battalion 371:IFV, the 222:U.S. Army 184:in 2009. 112:2009–2014 5115:Archived 5040:(Report) 4960:Archived 4941:Archived 4917:Archived 4887:Archived 4857:Archived 4826:Archived 4805:Archived 4787:6 August 4755:Archived 4723:Archived 4688:Archived 4606:Archived 4458:ASD News 4404:Archived 4345:Archived 4276:Archived 4225:19 April 4219:Archived 4215:Shephard 4194:9 August 4081:19 April 4075:Archived 4071:Shephard 4050:29 March 3931:Archived 3910:29 March 3871:Archived 3867:24831175 3832:Archived 3801:Archived 3770:Archived 3739:Archived 3701:Archived 3682:Archived 3663:Archived 3627:Archived 3596:archived 3392:Archived 3361:Archived 3357:24836079 3273:Archived 3239:Archived 3196:DoD Buzz 3169:Archived 3165:24836807 3130:Archived 3069:Archived 3039:Archived 3006:Archived 2870:Archived 2866:24834209 2808:Archived 2729:Archived 2725:24833515 2690:Archived 2638:Archived 2611:Archived 2532:4 August 2501:6 August 2495:Archived 2263:5 August 2221:Archived 2168:Archived 2073:Archived 1922:Archived 1895:Archived 1837:archived 1758:9 August 1735:9 August 1667:43995956 1483:SPz Puma 1467:program) 1416:Vehicles 1411:See also 1354:Wheeled. 1346:Features 1318:Features 1264:Features 1225:Raytheon 1179:Features 1086:Variants 1069:platoons 971:airburst 967:30x173mm 918:Mobility 620:Revision 570:Raytheon 330:The GCV 300:General 249:General 109:Designed 97:Designer 87:Canceled 5181:Network 4667:28 July 4641:27 July 4549:27 July 4518:18 June 3838:26 June 3602:14 July 3562:Defense 3530:value ( 2052:23 June 1550:7 April 1438:Stryker 1105:Bradley 1048:Tactics 924:Stryker 879:Network 862:modular 832:chassis 548:QinetiQ 525:CV-9035 501:CV-9035 425:brigade 264:Stryker 5074:  5044:13 May 5021:  4761:21 May 4729:21 May 3865:  3526:Check 3509:13 May 3467:13 May 3355:  3163:  3012:8 June 2864:  2723:  2110:11 May 1665:  1584:12 May 1379:Humvee 1198:V-hull 1012:Trophy 845:(FCS) 819:, the 804:Design 781:Legacy 746:Trophy 579:Boeing 556:iRobot 554:, and 365:Caiman 5118:(PDF) 5111:(PDF) 5090:(PDF) 4832:8 May 4579:(PDF) 4572:(PDF) 4377:(PDF) 4370:(PDF) 4188:(PDF) 4181:(PDF) 4153:(PDF) 4146:(PDF) 3972:(PDF) 3965:(PDF) 3863:JSTOR 3353:JSTOR 3242:(PDF) 3235:(PDF) 3161:JSTOR 2954:(PDF) 2947:(PDF) 2862:JSTOR 2721:JSTOR 2468:(PDF) 2461:(PDF) 2257:(PDF) 1872:(PDF) 1861:(PDF) 1663:JSTOR 1540:(PDF) 1477:Namer 1374:Artis 521:Namer 452:Namer 283:C-130 167:squad 5098:2023 5072:ISBN 5046:2024 5019:ISBN 4925:2023 4895:2023 4865:2023 4834:2013 4789:2010 4763:2010 4731:2010 4696:2023 4669:2010 4643:2010 4614:2010 4587:2010 4551:2010 4520:2010 4470:2010 4440:2009 4412:2023 4385:2010 4353:2023 4310:2015 4284:2023 4253:2010 4227:2010 4196:2010 4161:2010 4124:2010 4083:2010 4052:2010 4022:2010 3980:2009 3939:2010 3912:2010 3879:2023 3840:2023 3809:2022 3778:2022 3747:2022 3635:2023 3604:2022 3574:2012 3532:help 3511:2024 3469:2024 3431:2014 3400:2023 3369:2023 3330:2023 3281:2023 3250:2023 3218:link 3204:2023 3177:2023 3138:2013 3108:2023 3077:2013 3047:2023 3014:2012 2962:2010 2930:2010 2904:2011 2878:2023 2839:2011 2816:2011 2789:2011 2763:2011 2737:2023 2698:2010 2672:2011 2646:2010 2619:2010 2589:2010 2560:2010 2534:2010 2503:2010 2476:2010 2444:2010 2413:2010 2382:2010 2351:2010 2320:2010 2291:2011 2265:2010 2229:2010 2202:2009 2176:2009 2138:2010 2112:2010 2081:2010 2054:2010 2020:2010 1994:2010 1963:2010 1930:2010 1903:2009 1845:2013 1812:2010 1786:2009 1760:2010 1737:2010 1674:2022 1640:2021 1586:2024 1552:2010 1223:and 1031:MRAP 1018:The 997:MRAP 864:and 726:IEDs 651:Puma 585:and 575:SAIC 568:and 511:and 456:Puma 415:The 220:The 157:and 118:The 61:Type 1501:K21 724:to 224:'s 124:GCV 5271:: 5234:: 5036:. 4983:^ 4911:. 4881:. 4851:. 4739:^ 4717:. 4704:^ 4651:^ 4634:. 4622:^ 4559:^ 4528:^ 4500:^ 4486:. 4456:. 4429:. 4343:. 4339:. 4274:. 4270:. 4244:. 4213:. 4169:^ 4132:^ 4110:. 4091:^ 4069:. 4038:. 3988:^ 3947:^ 3898:. 3887:^ 3869:. 3857:. 3830:. 3826:. 3799:. 3795:. 3768:. 3764:. 3737:. 3733:. 3621:. 3590:, 3560:, 3523:: 3521:}} 3517:{{ 3501:. 3477:^ 3460:. 3417:. 3386:. 3359:. 3347:. 3316:. 3297:. 3267:. 3214:}} 3210:{{ 3194:. 3167:. 3155:. 3124:. 3094:. 3055:^ 3033:. 3022:^ 3004:. 3000:. 2981:. 2970:^ 2921:. 2895:. 2868:. 2856:. 2780:. 2754:. 2727:. 2715:. 2663:. 2597:^ 2580:. 2568:^ 2551:. 2520:. 2493:. 2430:. 2399:. 2368:. 2337:. 2311:. 2299:^ 2237:^ 2193:. 2166:. 2162:. 2146:^ 2129:. 2098:. 2040:. 2028:^ 2011:. 1983:. 1971:^ 1947:. 1920:. 1893:. 1889:. 1863:. 1835:, 1829:, 1803:. 1777:. 1657:. 1630:. 1594:^ 1572:. 1560:^ 1542:. 1526:^ 1219:, 1215:, 1033:. 987:. 953:, 740:. 581:, 546:, 542:, 523:, 519:, 499:A 487:A 475:. 338:. 142:. 5100:. 5080:. 5059:. 5048:. 5027:. 4927:. 4897:. 4867:. 4836:. 4791:. 4765:. 4733:. 4698:. 4671:. 4645:. 4616:. 4589:. 4553:. 4522:. 4472:. 4442:. 4414:. 4387:. 4355:. 4312:. 4286:. 4255:. 4229:. 4198:. 4163:. 4126:. 4085:. 4054:. 4024:. 3982:. 3941:. 3914:. 3881:. 3842:. 3811:. 3780:. 3749:. 3637:. 3607:. 3577:. 3534:) 3513:. 3471:. 3433:. 3402:. 3371:. 3332:. 3283:. 3252:. 3220:) 3206:. 3179:. 3140:. 3110:. 3079:. 3049:. 3016:. 2964:. 2932:. 2906:. 2880:. 2841:. 2818:. 2791:. 2765:. 2739:. 2700:. 2674:. 2648:. 2621:. 2591:. 2562:. 2536:. 2505:. 2478:. 2446:. 2415:. 2384:. 2353:. 2322:. 2293:. 2267:. 2231:. 2204:. 2178:. 2140:. 2114:. 2083:. 2056:. 2022:. 1996:. 1965:. 1932:. 1905:. 1814:. 1788:. 1762:. 1739:. 1676:. 1642:. 1588:. 1554:. 122:( 31:. 20:)

Index

BCT Ground Combat Vehicle Program
ground combat vehicle

Infantry fighting vehicle
Government Furnished E/I/M
United States Army
armored fighting vehicle
infantry fighting vehicle
M2 Bradley
National Guard
Heavy Brigade Combat Teams
BAE Systems
General Dynamics Land Systems
squad
Department of Defense
Future Combat Systems
Manned Ground Vehicles
Bradley Fighting Vehicles
Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle
M113 armored personnel carrier
Next Generation Combat Vehicle
Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle
U.S. Army
M2 Bradley
infantry fighting vehicle
Armored Systems Modernization
main battle tanks
U.S. Army Chief of Staff
Eric Shinseki
operations short of war

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑