Knowledge (XXG)

Barron v. Baltimore

Source đź“ť

34: 257:
Barron. The material settled into the water near the wharf, decreasing the depth of the water to a point where it was nearly impossible for ships to approach it. As it was no longer easily accessible for ships, the business's profitability declined substantially. Barron sued the City of Baltimore for losses, arguing that he was deprived of his property without the due process afforded him by the Fifth Amendment. Barron was awarded $ 4,500 in compensation by the trial court, but a Maryland appellate court reversed the decision.
488: 284:
The third clause (of Section 9), for example, declares that "no bill of attainder or ex post facto law shall be passed." No language can be more general; yet the demonstration is complete that it applies solely to the government of the United States.... the succeeding section, the avowed purpose of
256:
initiated a public works project that involved the modification of several streams that emptied into Baltimore Harbor. City construction resulted in large amounts of sediment being deposited into the streams, which then emptied into the harbor near a profitable wharf owned and operated by John
285:
which is to restrain state legislation... declares that "no state shall pass any bill of attainder or ex post facto law.” This provision, then, of the ninth section, however comprehensive its language, contains no restriction on state legislation.
2086: 2254: 1797: 2214: 2399: 2118: 511: 1894: 337:
Barron v. Baltimore clarified federalism and highlighted the need for constitutional protections, which helped allow for the Fourteenth Amendment to extend the Bill of Rights to the states.
301:, some of whom maintained that Congress could constitutionally abolish slavery, under the Bill of Rights. The case was largely unknown in the 1860s; during a debate in Congress on the 302: 241: 204: 359: 218: 503: 75: 2278: 2262: 2102: 657: 616: 266: 2030: 648: 1469: 660: 2062: 277:
held that the first ten "amendments contain no expression indicating an intention to apply them to the State governments. This court cannot so apply them."
1958: 2404: 2318: 326:
of the Fourteenth Amendment, which was interpreted to have the same meaning as the Fifth Amendment, to apply most of the Bill of Rights to the states by
294:
The case was particularly important in terms of American government because it stated that the Bill of Rights did not restrict the state governments.
280:
To demonstrate that Constitutional limits did not apply to states unless expressly stated, Marshall used the example of Article I, Sections 9 and 10:
2302: 2182: 607: 2369: 2158: 2126: 265:
The Supreme Court heard arguments on the case on February 8 and 11 and decided on February 16, 1833. It held that the Bill of Rights, such as the
2238: 1477: 273:
for takings of private property for public use, are restrictions on the federal government alone. Writing for a unanimous court, Chief Justice
237: 1733: 1129: 1982: 641: 2070: 1525: 390: 2286: 2270: 2094: 2054: 1878: 221: 38: 674: 298: 57:
John Barron, survivor of John Craig, for the use of Luke Tiernan, Executor of John Craig v. The Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
2394: 2142: 1453: 1278: 874: 1934: 2389: 1813: 1725: 1054: 634: 225: 2222: 2190: 1942: 1926: 1805: 327: 1966: 1886: 2384: 2334: 2310: 2230: 941: 2198: 1078: 1011: 775: 600: 2374: 2078: 818: 318: 1990: 1765: 527: 2246: 2038: 2022: 1366: 1294: 703: 2379: 2206: 2134: 1870: 1789: 1621: 1178: 842: 719: 82: 2006: 2326: 2046: 1773: 1549: 1286: 1145: 2150: 1902: 1094: 1862: 1581: 1334: 1190: 581:
Original Maryland lower court documents with outline courtesy of the Maryland State Archives, http://mdsa.net
2166: 1974: 1910: 1517: 1326: 1086: 1030: 976: 909: 901: 834: 735: 626: 593: 140: 826: 554: 433:
Randy E. Barnett (2010). "Whence Comes Section One? The Abolitionist Origins of the Fourteenth Amendment."
2014: 1685: 1661: 1541: 1445: 1437: 1310: 1254: 960: 933: 925: 858: 799: 791: 756: 1509: 1461: 1854: 1701: 1637: 1358: 1230: 1198: 1070: 968: 687: 507: 492: 414: 363: 229: 172: 67: 2294: 1717: 1669: 1214: 1950: 1653: 1645: 1597: 380:"DATES OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS AND ARGUMENTS. UNITED STATES REPORTS. VOLUMES 2 – 107 (1791 – 1882)" 1605: 1573: 1121: 992: 536: 1693: 1613: 1589: 1557: 1350: 1318: 1270: 1262: 1222: 1038: 882: 467: 418: 253: 2342: 1741: 1565: 1425: 1302: 1238: 1206: 1153: 1137: 727: 354: 323: 103:
Accepted on writ of error to the Court of Appeals for the Western Shore of the State of Maryland.
2174: 1757: 1533: 1493: 1485: 1342: 1046: 984: 866: 457: 438: 270: 233: 114: 379: 1998: 1709: 1501: 1390: 1246: 1113: 1062: 322:, 92 U.S. 542 (1876). However, since the early 20th century, the Supreme Court has used the 2110: 1677: 1382: 917: 850: 783: 585: 1918: 1834: 1629: 1374: 711: 580: 518: 473: 366: 160: 148: 545: 2363: 1749: 1398: 695: 274: 132: 1781: 306: 152: 70: 164: 2087:
Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City
572: 2255:
Stop the Beach Renourishment v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection
487: 1798:
Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California
2215:
Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
472:
Outline, Notes and Documents Concerning Barron v Baltimore, 32 U.S. 243,
86: 442: 563: 334:
and its progeny have been circumvented, if not actually overruled.
1895:
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago
2119:
First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Los Angeles County
1832: 1423: 1176: 754: 672: 630: 589: 33: 16:
1833 U.S. Supreme Court case on the scope of the Bill of Rights
309:
had to read part of Marshall's opinion aloud to the Senate.
2239:
San Remo Hotel, L.P. v. City & County of San Francisco
240:, establishing a precedent until the ratification of the 2400:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Marshall Court
242:
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
2263:
Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States
474:
http://mdhistory.net/msaref06/barron/html/index.html
2279:
Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District
1105: 1022: 1003: 952: 893: 810: 767: 185: 180: 121: 107: 99: 94: 62: 52: 45: 26: 297:The decision was initially ignored by the growing 316:to reaffirm its central holding, most notably in 224:case in 1833, which helped define the concept of 2031:Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City 330:. Therefore, as to most of the Bill of Rights, 1470:Railroad Retirement Board v. Alton Railroad Co. 282: 2103:Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. DeBenedictis 642: 601: 8: 2063:Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp. 2055:Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. Beckwith 312:Later Supreme Court rulings would return to 2143:Preseault v. Interstate Commerce Commission 1959:Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Radford 464:, New York: Henry Holt & Company, 1996. 435:The Journal of Legal Analysis, Vol. 3, 2011 2319:Pakdel v. City and County of San Francisco 1935:Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. United States 1829: 1420: 1173: 764: 751: 669: 649: 635: 627: 608: 594: 586: 23: 2303:Knick v. Township of Scott, Pennsylvania 2183:Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency 2223:Brown v. Legal Foundation of Washington 2191:Phillips v. Washington Legal Foundation 2159:Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council 2127:Nollan v. California Coastal Commission 1943:Rindge Company v. County of Los Angeles 514:) 243 (1833) is available from: 346: 113:State governments are not bound by the 1478:United States v. Carolene Products Co. 423:Federalism in America: An Encyclopedia 396:from the original on December 11, 2017 2287:Horne v. Department of Agriculture II 1967:United States v. General Motors Corp. 1887:Monongahela Nav. Co. v. United States 1130:Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber 21:1833 United States Supreme Court case 7: 2271:Horne v. Department of Agriculture I 1983:Kimball Laundry Co. v. United States 217:, 32 U.S. (7 Pet.) 243 (1833), is a 2071:Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff 1526:Department of Agriculture v. Moreno 2095:United States v. Riverside Bayview 1879:Head v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co. 1734:Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña 462:John Marshall: Definer Of A Nation 387:Supreme Court of the United States 39:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 2405:United States Supreme Court cases 2079:Ruckelshaus v. Montanato Company 875:Bravo-Fernandez v. United States 486: 32: 1991:United States v. Pewee Coal Co. 1726:Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC 2370:1833 in United States case law 1927:Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon 1806:United States v. Vaello Madero 1766:Flores-Villar v. United States 1: 2335:Sheetz v. County of El Dorado 2311:Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid 2231:Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. 2039:Kaiser Aetna v. United States 1454:Adkins v. Children's Hospital 658:United States Fifth Amendment 617:United States Fifth Amendment 2199:Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel 1814:Department of State v. Muñoz 1079:Puerto Rico v. Sanchez Valle 1012:Blockburger v. United States 776:Blockburger v. United States 2135:Pennell v. City of San Jose 1790:Sessions v. Morales-Santana 819:United States v. Randenbush 319:United States v. Cruikshank 232:. The Court ruled that the 222:United States Supreme Court 2421: 2247:Kelo v. City of New London 2023:Armstrong v. United States 2007:Nelson v. City of New York 1367:J. D. B. v. North Carolina 1295:Dickerson v. United States 704:Wong Wing v. United States 573:Oyez (oral argument audio) 2207:Palazzolo v. Rhode Island 1871:Cole v. City of La Grange 1841: 1828: 1622:United States v. Antelope 1432: 1419: 1279:Mitchell v. United States 1185: 1179:Self-Incrimination Clause 1172: 1023:Dual sovereignty doctrine 843:Fong Foo v. United States 768:Meaning of "same offense" 763: 750: 720:United States v. Moreland 682: 668: 624: 203: 196: 126: 112: 48:Decided February 16, 1833 31: 2327:Tyler v. Hennepin County 2151:Yee v. City of Escondido 2047:Agins v. City of Tiburon 1903:Peabody v. United States 1774:United States v. Windsor 1550:Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld 1287:United States v. Hubbell 1146:North Carolina v. Pearce 1095:Denezpi v. United States 1055:United States v. Wheeler 46:Argued February 11, 1833 2395:Takings Clause case law 2167:Dolan v. City of Tigard 1975:United States v. Causby 1863:United States v. Lawton 1582:Hampton v. Mow Sun Wong 1518:Frontiero v. Richardson 1335:Corley v. United States 1327:United States v. Patane 1191:Curcio v. United States 1087:Gamble v. United States 977:United States v. Dinitz 910:Ludwig v. Massachusetts 902:United States v. Wilson 835:Burton v. United States 736:United States v. Cotton 328:selective incorporation 2390:Incorporation case law 1911:United States v. Cress 1686:Fullilove v. Klutznick 1542:Schlesinger v. Ballard 1446:Adair v. United States 1438:Dred Scott v. Sandford 1311:Yarborough v. Alvarado 1031:United States v. Lanza 961:United States v. Perez 942:Smith v. United States 934:United States v. Dixon 926:United States v. Felix 859:Burks v. United States 800:United States v. Dixon 792:United States v. Felix 757:Double Jeopardy Clause 287: 205:U.S. Const. amend. XIV 1855:Kohl v. United States 1359:Berghuis v. Thompkins 1199:Griffin v. California 1071:United States v. Lara 969:United States v. Jorn 827:Ball v. United States 688:Hurtado v. California 299:abolitionist movement 236:did not apply to the 230:US constitutional law 2385:February 1833 events 2015:United States v. Dow 1662:Califano v. Westcott 1606:Califano v. Goldfarb 1255:Doe v. United States 1122:Palko v. Connecticut 993:Blueford v. Arkansas 303:Fourteenth Amendment 189:Marshall, joined by 1847:Barron v. Baltimore 1694:Rostker v. Goldberg 1614:Califano v. Webster 1590:Washington v. Davis 1558:Mathews v. Eldridge 1510:Richardson v. Davis 1462:Nichols v. Coolidge 1351:Maryland v. Shatzer 1319:Missouri v. Seibert 1271:McNeil v. Wisconsin 1263:Illinois v. Perkins 1223:Williams v. Florida 1039:Bartkus v. Illinois 1004:Multiple punishment 883:McElrath v. Georgia 555:Library of Congress 500:Barron v. Baltimore 493:Barron v. Baltimore 468:Edward C. Papenfuse 419:Barron v. Baltimore 415:Cortner, Richard C. 254:Baltimore, Maryland 214:Barron v. Baltimore 27:Barron v. Baltimore 2375:1830s in Baltimore 2343:DeVillier v. Texas 1742:Miller v. Albright 1702:Heckler v. Mathews 1638:Califano v. Torres 1566:Hills v. Gautreaux 1426:Due Process Clause 1303:Chavez v. Martinez 1239:Edwards v. Arizona 1231:Michigan v. Tucker 1207:Miranda v. Arizona 1154:Benton v. Maryland 1138:Baxstrom v. Herold 728:Beck v. Washington 661:criminal procedure 452:General references 355:Gitlow v. New York 324:Due Process Clause 137:Associate Justices 2357: 2356: 2353: 2352: 2295:Murr v. Wisconsin 2175:Babbitt v. Youpee 1824: 1823: 1758:Zadvydas v. Davis 1718:Bowen v. Gilliard 1670:Harris v. Rosario 1534:Morton v. Mancari 1494:Schneider v. Rusk 1486:Bolling v. Sharpe 1413: 1412: 1409: 1408: 1343:Florida v. Powell 1215:Boulden v. Holman 1168: 1167: 1164: 1163: 1047:Waller v. Florida 985:Oregon v. Kennedy 867:Evans v. Michigan 746: 745: 491:Works related to 458:Jean Edward Smith 271:just compensation 238:state governments 210: 209: 2412: 2380:1833 in Maryland 1999:Berman v. Parker 1951:Leonard v. Earle 1830: 1710:Lyng v. Castillo 1654:Davis v. Passman 1646:Vance v. Bradley 1598:Mathews v. Lucas 1502:Rogers v. Bellei 1421: 1391:Salinas v. Texas 1247:Oregon v. Elstad 1174: 1114:Ex parte Bigelow 1063:Heath v. Alabama 894:After conviction 765: 752: 670: 651: 644: 637: 628: 610: 603: 596: 587: 577: 571: 568: 562: 559: 553: 550: 544: 541: 535: 532: 526: 523: 517: 490: 445: 431: 425: 412: 406: 405: 403: 401: 395: 384: 376: 370: 351: 269:'s guarantee of 122:Court membership 36: 35: 24: 2420: 2419: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2349: 2111:Hodel v. Irving 1837: 1820: 1678:Harris v. McRae 1574:Mathews v. Diaz 1428: 1415: 1414: 1405: 1383:Howes v. Fields 1181: 1160: 1101: 1018: 999: 948: 918:Grady v. Corbin 889: 851:Ashe v. Swenson 811:After acquittal 806: 784:Grady v. Corbin 759: 742: 678: 664: 655: 620: 614: 575: 569: 566: 560: 557: 551: 548: 542: 539: 533: 530: 524: 521: 515: 483: 454: 449: 448: 432: 428: 413: 409: 399: 397: 393: 382: 378: 377: 373: 352: 348: 343: 292: 267:Fifth Amendment 263: 250: 199: 163: 151: 141:William Johnson 90: 47: 41: 22: 17: 12: 11: 5: 2418: 2416: 2408: 2407: 2402: 2397: 2392: 2387: 2382: 2377: 2372: 2362: 2361: 2355: 2354: 2351: 2350: 2348: 2347: 2339: 2331: 2323: 2315: 2307: 2299: 2291: 2283: 2275: 2267: 2259: 2251: 2243: 2235: 2227: 2219: 2211: 2203: 2195: 2187: 2179: 2171: 2163: 2155: 2147: 2139: 2131: 2123: 2115: 2107: 2099: 2091: 2083: 2075: 2067: 2059: 2051: 2043: 2035: 2027: 2019: 2011: 2003: 1995: 1987: 1979: 1971: 1963: 1955: 1947: 1939: 1931: 1923: 1919:Block v. Hirsh 1915: 1907: 1899: 1891: 1883: 1875: 1867: 1859: 1851: 1842: 1839: 1838: 1835:Takings Clause 1833: 1826: 1825: 1822: 1821: 1819: 1818: 1810: 1802: 1794: 1786: 1778: 1770: 1762: 1754: 1746: 1738: 1730: 1722: 1714: 1706: 1698: 1690: 1682: 1674: 1666: 1658: 1650: 1642: 1634: 1630:Fiallo v. Bell 1626: 1618: 1610: 1602: 1594: 1586: 1578: 1570: 1562: 1554: 1546: 1538: 1530: 1522: 1514: 1506: 1498: 1490: 1482: 1474: 1466: 1458: 1450: 1442: 1433: 1430: 1429: 1424: 1417: 1416: 1411: 1410: 1407: 1406: 1404: 1403: 1395: 1387: 1379: 1375:Bobby v. Dixon 1371: 1363: 1355: 1347: 1339: 1331: 1323: 1315: 1307: 1299: 1291: 1283: 1275: 1267: 1259: 1251: 1243: 1235: 1227: 1219: 1211: 1203: 1195: 1186: 1183: 1182: 1177: 1170: 1169: 1166: 1165: 1162: 1161: 1159: 1158: 1150: 1142: 1134: 1126: 1118: 1109: 1107: 1103: 1102: 1100: 1099: 1091: 1083: 1075: 1067: 1059: 1051: 1043: 1035: 1026: 1024: 1020: 1019: 1017: 1016: 1007: 1005: 1001: 1000: 998: 997: 989: 981: 973: 965: 956: 954: 953:After mistrial 950: 949: 947: 946: 938: 930: 922: 914: 906: 897: 895: 891: 890: 888: 887: 879: 871: 863: 855: 847: 839: 831: 823: 814: 812: 808: 807: 805: 804: 796: 788: 780: 771: 769: 761: 760: 755: 748: 747: 744: 743: 741: 740: 732: 724: 716: 712:Maxwell v. Dow 708: 700: 692: 683: 680: 679: 673: 666: 665: 656: 654: 653: 646: 639: 631: 625: 622: 621: 615: 613: 612: 605: 598: 590: 584: 583: 578: 537:Google Scholar 496: 482: 481:External links 479: 478: 477: 465: 453: 450: 447: 446: 426: 407: 371: 345: 344: 342: 339: 305:, Congressman 291: 288: 262: 259: 249: 246: 234:Bill of Rights 208: 207: 201: 200: 197: 194: 193: 187: 183: 182: 178: 177: 176: 175: 161:Smith Thompson 149:Gabriel Duvall 138: 135: 130: 124: 123: 119: 118: 115:Bill of Rights 110: 109: 105: 104: 101: 97: 96: 92: 91: 80: 64: 60: 59: 54: 53:Full case name 50: 49: 43: 42: 37: 29: 28: 20: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2417: 2406: 2403: 2401: 2398: 2396: 2393: 2391: 2388: 2386: 2383: 2381: 2378: 2376: 2373: 2371: 2368: 2367: 2365: 2345: 2344: 2340: 2337: 2336: 2332: 2329: 2328: 2324: 2321: 2320: 2316: 2313: 2312: 2308: 2305: 2304: 2300: 2297: 2296: 2292: 2289: 2288: 2284: 2281: 2280: 2276: 2273: 2272: 2268: 2265: 2264: 2260: 2257: 2256: 2252: 2249: 2248: 2244: 2241: 2240: 2236: 2233: 2232: 2228: 2225: 2224: 2220: 2217: 2216: 2212: 2209: 2208: 2204: 2201: 2200: 2196: 2193: 2192: 2188: 2185: 2184: 2180: 2177: 2176: 2172: 2169: 2168: 2164: 2161: 2160: 2156: 2153: 2152: 2148: 2145: 2144: 2140: 2137: 2136: 2132: 2129: 2128: 2124: 2121: 2120: 2116: 2113: 2112: 2108: 2105: 2104: 2100: 2097: 2096: 2092: 2089: 2088: 2084: 2081: 2080: 2076: 2073: 2072: 2068: 2065: 2064: 2060: 2057: 2056: 2052: 2049: 2048: 2044: 2041: 2040: 2036: 2033: 2032: 2028: 2025: 2024: 2020: 2017: 2016: 2012: 2009: 2008: 2004: 2001: 2000: 1996: 1993: 1992: 1988: 1985: 1984: 1980: 1977: 1976: 1972: 1969: 1968: 1964: 1961: 1960: 1956: 1953: 1952: 1948: 1945: 1944: 1940: 1937: 1936: 1932: 1929: 1928: 1924: 1921: 1920: 1916: 1913: 1912: 1908: 1905: 1904: 1900: 1897: 1896: 1892: 1889: 1888: 1884: 1881: 1880: 1876: 1873: 1872: 1868: 1865: 1864: 1860: 1857: 1856: 1852: 1849: 1848: 1844: 1843: 1840: 1836: 1831: 1827: 1816: 1815: 1811: 1808: 1807: 1803: 1800: 1799: 1795: 1792: 1791: 1787: 1784: 1783: 1779: 1776: 1775: 1771: 1768: 1767: 1763: 1760: 1759: 1755: 1752: 1751: 1750:Nguyen v. INS 1747: 1744: 1743: 1739: 1736: 1735: 1731: 1728: 1727: 1723: 1720: 1719: 1715: 1712: 1711: 1707: 1704: 1703: 1699: 1696: 1695: 1691: 1688: 1687: 1683: 1680: 1679: 1675: 1672: 1671: 1667: 1664: 1663: 1659: 1656: 1655: 1651: 1648: 1647: 1643: 1640: 1639: 1635: 1632: 1631: 1627: 1624: 1623: 1619: 1616: 1615: 1611: 1608: 1607: 1603: 1600: 1599: 1595: 1592: 1591: 1587: 1584: 1583: 1579: 1576: 1575: 1571: 1568: 1567: 1563: 1560: 1559: 1555: 1552: 1551: 1547: 1544: 1543: 1539: 1536: 1535: 1531: 1528: 1527: 1523: 1520: 1519: 1515: 1512: 1511: 1507: 1504: 1503: 1499: 1496: 1495: 1491: 1488: 1487: 1483: 1480: 1479: 1475: 1472: 1471: 1467: 1464: 1463: 1459: 1456: 1455: 1451: 1448: 1447: 1443: 1440: 1439: 1435: 1434: 1431: 1427: 1422: 1418: 1401: 1400: 1399:Vega v. Tekoh 1396: 1393: 1392: 1388: 1385: 1384: 1380: 1377: 1376: 1372: 1369: 1368: 1364: 1361: 1360: 1356: 1353: 1352: 1348: 1345: 1344: 1340: 1337: 1336: 1332: 1329: 1328: 1324: 1321: 1320: 1316: 1313: 1312: 1308: 1305: 1304: 1300: 1297: 1296: 1292: 1289: 1288: 1284: 1281: 1280: 1276: 1273: 1272: 1268: 1265: 1264: 1260: 1257: 1256: 1252: 1249: 1248: 1244: 1241: 1240: 1236: 1233: 1232: 1228: 1225: 1224: 1220: 1217: 1216: 1212: 1209: 1208: 1204: 1201: 1200: 1196: 1193: 1192: 1188: 1187: 1184: 1180: 1175: 1171: 1156: 1155: 1151: 1148: 1147: 1143: 1140: 1139: 1135: 1132: 1131: 1127: 1124: 1123: 1119: 1116: 1115: 1111: 1110: 1108: 1104: 1097: 1096: 1092: 1089: 1088: 1084: 1081: 1080: 1076: 1073: 1072: 1068: 1065: 1064: 1060: 1057: 1056: 1052: 1049: 1048: 1044: 1041: 1040: 1036: 1033: 1032: 1028: 1027: 1025: 1021: 1014: 1013: 1009: 1008: 1006: 1002: 995: 994: 990: 987: 986: 982: 979: 978: 974: 971: 970: 966: 963: 962: 958: 957: 955: 951: 944: 943: 939: 936: 935: 931: 928: 927: 923: 920: 919: 915: 912: 911: 907: 904: 903: 899: 898: 896: 892: 885: 884: 880: 877: 876: 872: 869: 868: 864: 861: 860: 856: 853: 852: 848: 845: 844: 840: 837: 836: 832: 829: 828: 824: 821: 820: 816: 815: 813: 809: 802: 801: 797: 794: 793: 789: 786: 785: 781: 778: 777: 773: 772: 770: 766: 762: 758: 753: 749: 738: 737: 733: 730: 729: 725: 722: 721: 717: 714: 713: 709: 706: 705: 701: 698: 697: 696:Ex parte Bain 693: 690: 689: 685: 684: 681: 676: 671: 667: 662: 659: 652: 647: 645: 640: 638: 633: 632: 629: 623: 618: 611: 606: 604: 599: 597: 592: 591: 588: 582: 579: 574: 565: 556: 547: 538: 529: 520: 513: 509: 505: 501: 497: 495:at Wikisource 494: 489: 485: 484: 480: 476: 475: 469: 466: 463: 459: 456: 455: 451: 444: 440: 436: 430: 427: 424: 420: 416: 411: 408: 392: 388: 381: 375: 372: 368: 365: 361: 357: 356: 350: 347: 340: 338: 335: 333: 329: 325: 321: 320: 315: 310: 308: 304: 300: 295: 289: 286: 281: 278: 276: 275:John Marshall 272: 268: 260: 258: 255: 247: 245: 243: 239: 235: 231: 227: 223: 220: 216: 215: 206: 202: 198:Superseded by 195: 192: 188: 184: 179: 174: 173:Henry Baldwin 170: 166: 162: 158: 154: 150: 146: 142: 139: 136: 134: 133:John Marshall 131: 129:Chief Justice 128: 127: 125: 120: 116: 111: 106: 102: 98: 93: 88: 84: 78: 77: 72: 69: 65: 61: 58: 55: 51: 44: 40: 30: 25: 19: 2341: 2333: 2325: 2317: 2309: 2301: 2293: 2285: 2277: 2269: 2261: 2253: 2245: 2237: 2229: 2221: 2213: 2205: 2197: 2189: 2181: 2173: 2165: 2157: 2149: 2141: 2133: 2125: 2117: 2109: 2101: 2093: 2085: 2077: 2069: 2061: 2053: 2045: 2037: 2029: 2021: 2013: 2005: 1997: 1989: 1981: 1973: 1965: 1957: 1949: 1941: 1933: 1925: 1917: 1909: 1901: 1893: 1885: 1877: 1869: 1861: 1853: 1846: 1845: 1812: 1804: 1796: 1788: 1782:Kerry v. Din 1780: 1772: 1764: 1756: 1748: 1740: 1732: 1724: 1716: 1708: 1700: 1692: 1684: 1676: 1668: 1660: 1652: 1644: 1636: 1628: 1620: 1612: 1604: 1596: 1588: 1580: 1572: 1564: 1556: 1548: 1540: 1532: 1524: 1516: 1508: 1500: 1492: 1484: 1476: 1468: 1460: 1452: 1444: 1436: 1397: 1389: 1381: 1373: 1365: 1357: 1349: 1341: 1333: 1325: 1317: 1309: 1301: 1293: 1285: 1277: 1269: 1261: 1253: 1245: 1237: 1229: 1221: 1213: 1205: 1197: 1189: 1152: 1144: 1136: 1128: 1120: 1112: 1093: 1085: 1077: 1069: 1061: 1053: 1045: 1037: 1029: 1010: 991: 983: 975: 967: 959: 940: 932: 924: 916: 908: 900: 881: 873: 865: 857: 849: 841: 833: 825: 817: 798: 790: 782: 774: 734: 726: 718: 710: 702: 694: 686: 499: 471: 461: 434: 429: 422: 410: 398:. Retrieved 386: 374: 369: (1925). 353: 349: 336: 331: 317: 313: 311: 307:John Bingham 296: 293: 283: 279: 264: 252:The city of 251: 213: 212: 211: 190: 181:Case opinion 168: 156: 153:Joseph Story 144: 95:Case history 74: 56: 18: 165:John McLean 2364:Categories 675:Grand Jury 564:OpenJurist 341:References 248:Background 226:federalism 290:Aftermath 191:unanimous 63:Citations 663:case law 619:case law 498:Text of 400:March 2, 391:Archived 261:Decision 219:landmark 186:Majority 528:Findlaw 519:Cornell 443:1538862 417:2006. " 108:Holding 85:243; 8 2346:(2024) 2338:(2024) 2330:(2023) 2322:(2021) 2314:(2021) 2306:(2019) 2298:(2017) 2290:(2015) 2282:(2013) 2274:(2013) 2266:(2012) 2258:(2010) 2250:(2005) 2242:(2005) 2234:(2005) 2226:(2003) 2218:(2002) 2210:(2001) 2202:(1998) 2194:(1998) 2186:(1997) 2178:(1997) 2170:(1994) 2162:(1992) 2154:(1992) 2146:(1990) 2138:(1988) 2130:(1987) 2122:(1987) 2114:(1987) 2106:(1987) 2098:(1985) 2090:(1985) 2082:(1984) 2074:(1984) 2066:(1982) 2058:(1980) 2050:(1980) 2042:(1979) 2034:(1978) 2026:(1960) 2018:(1958) 2010:(1956) 2002:(1954) 1994:(1951) 1986:(1949) 1978:(1946) 1970:(1945) 1962:(1935) 1954:(1929) 1946:(1923) 1938:(1923) 1930:(1922) 1922:(1921) 1914:(1917) 1906:(1913) 1898:(1897) 1890:(1893) 1882:(1885) 1874:(1885) 1866:(1884) 1858:(1875) 1850:(1833) 1817:(2024) 1809:(2022) 1801:(2020) 1793:(2017) 1785:(2015) 1777:(2013) 1769:(2011) 1761:(2001) 1753:(2001) 1745:(1998) 1737:(1995) 1729:(1990) 1721:(1987) 1713:(1986) 1705:(1984) 1697:(1981) 1689:(1980) 1681:(1980) 1673:(1980) 1665:(1979) 1657:(1979) 1649:(1979) 1641:(1978) 1633:(1977) 1625:(1977) 1617:(1977) 1609:(1977) 1601:(1976) 1593:(1976) 1585:(1976) 1577:(1976) 1569:(1976) 1561:(1976) 1553:(1975) 1545:(1975) 1537:(1974) 1529:(1973) 1521:(1973) 1513:(1972) 1505:(1971) 1497:(1964) 1489:(1954) 1481:(1938) 1473:(1935) 1465:(1927) 1457:(1923) 1449:(1908) 1441:(1857) 1402:(2022) 1394:(2013) 1386:(2012) 1378:(2011) 1370:(2011) 1362:(2010) 1354:(2010) 1346:(2010) 1338:(2009) 1330:(2004) 1322:(2004) 1314:(2004) 1306:(2003) 1298:(2000) 1290:(2000) 1282:(1999) 1274:(1991) 1266:(1990) 1258:(1988) 1250:(1985) 1242:(1981) 1234:(1974) 1226:(1970) 1218:(1969) 1210:(1966) 1202:(1965) 1194:(1957) 1157:(1969) 1149:(1969) 1141:(1966) 1133:(1947) 1125:(1937) 1117:(1885) 1098:(2022) 1090:(2019) 1082:(2016) 1074:(2004) 1066:(1985) 1058:(1978) 1050:(1970) 1042:(1959) 1034:(1922) 1015:(1932) 996:(2012) 988:(1982) 980:(1976) 972:(1971) 964:(1824) 945:(2023) 937:(1993) 929:(1992) 921:(1990) 913:(1976) 905:(1833) 886:(2024) 878:(2016) 870:(2013) 862:(1978) 854:(1970) 846:(1962) 838:(1906) 830:(1896) 822:(1834) 803:(1993) 795:(1992) 787:(1990) 779:(1932) 739:(2002) 731:(1962) 723:(1922) 715:(1900) 707:(1896) 699:(1887) 691:(1884) 677:Clause 576:  570:  567:  561:  558:  552:  549:  546:Justia 543:  540:  534:  531:  525:  522:  516:  441:  332:Barron 314:Barron 171: 169:· 167:  159: 157:· 155:  147: 145:· 143:  87:L. Ed. 1106:Other 506: 394:(PDF) 383:(PDF) 362: 100:Prior 512:Pet. 508:U.S. 439:SSRN 402:2018 364:U.S. 83:Pet. 76:more 68:U.S. 510:(7 437:. 421:". 367:652 360:268 228:in 89:672 71:243 66:32 2366:: 504:32 502:, 470:, 460:, 389:. 385:. 358:, 244:. 81:7 650:e 643:t 636:v 609:e 602:t 595:v 404:. 117:. 79:) 73:(

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
U.S.
243
more
Pet.
L. Ed.
Bill of Rights
John Marshall
William Johnson
Gabriel Duvall
Joseph Story
Smith Thompson
John McLean
Henry Baldwin
U.S. Const. amend. XIV
landmark
United States Supreme Court
federalism
US constitutional law
Bill of Rights
state governments
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Baltimore, Maryland
Fifth Amendment
just compensation
John Marshall
abolitionist movement
Fourteenth Amendment
John Bingham
United States v. Cruikshank

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑