Knowledge (XXG)

Baxstrom v. Herold

Source 📝

1114: 89: 24: 1189: 1179: 130: 346: 337: 349: 1194: 1174: 1184: 1155: 818: 330: 1121: 266: 93: 363: 63: 967: 563: 205: 743: 323: 630: 45: 34: 767: 700: 464: 507: 1055: 983: 392: 1148: 867: 531: 408: 975: 834: 1113: 783: 1023: 879: 1015: 775: 719: 665: 598: 590: 523: 424: 315: 41: 515: 999: 943: 649: 622: 614: 547: 488: 480: 445: 209: 1047: 919: 887: 759: 657: 376: 122: 903: 1141: 810: 681: 1039: 1007: 959: 951: 911: 727: 571: 991: 927: 895: 842: 416: 193: 1031: 735: 673: 555: 1125: 1079: 935: 802: 751: 270: 155: 1071: 606: 539: 472: 274: 159: 1063: 400: 217: 1168: 1087: 384: 197: 125: 310: 221: 177: 229: 185: 141: 137: 246:
Warren, joined by Douglas, Clark, Harlan, Brennan, Stewart, White, Fortas
158:
following a prison term does not constitute an unconstitutional
865: 443: 361: 319: 88: 17: 1129: 1190:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court
44:. Please help to ensure that disputed statements are 794: 711: 692: 641: 582: 499: 456: 250: 242: 237: 166: 149: 117: 107: 100: 81: 265:, 383 U.S. 107 (1966), was a case decided by the 273:following a prison term does not run afoul of 1180:United States Double Jeopardy Clause case law 1149: 331: 8: 112:Baxstrom v. Herold, State Hospital Director 1156: 1142: 862: 453: 440: 358: 338: 324: 316: 78: 64:Learn how and when to remove this message 311:Full text of the opinion from Justia.com 40:Relevant discussion may be found on the 286: 819:Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber 76:1966 United States Supreme Court case 7: 1110: 1108: 1128:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by 1122:Supreme Court of the United States 297:Foundation Press, NY: 2004, p. 664 267:Supreme Court of the United States 94:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 1195:United States Supreme Court stubs 1175:United States Supreme Court cases 1112: 564:Bravo-Fernandez v. United States 87: 22: 1185:1966 in United States case law 1: 347:United States Fifth Amendment 295:Criminal Law, Second Edition. 1120:This article related to the 768:Puerto Rico v. Sanchez Valle 701:Blockburger v. United States 465:Blockburger v. United States 508:United States v. Randenbush 1211: 1107: 1056:J. D. B. v. North Carolina 984:Dickerson v. United States 393:Wong Wing v. United States 968:Mitchell v. United States 874: 868:Self-Incrimination Clause 861: 712:Dual sovereignty doctrine 532:Fong Foo v. United States 457:Meaning of "same offense" 452: 439: 409:United States v. Moreland 371: 357: 171: 154: 103:Decided February 23, 1966 86: 976:United States v. Hubbell 835:North Carolina v. Pearce 784:Denezpi v. United States 744:United States v. Wheeler 1024:Corley v. United States 1016:United States v. Patane 880:Curcio v. United States 776:Gamble v. United States 666:United States v. Dinitz 599:Ludwig v. Massachusetts 591:United States v. Wilson 524:Burton v. United States 425:United States v. Cotton 101:Argued December 9, 1965 1000:Yarborough v. Alvarado 720:United States v. Lanza 650:United States v. Perez 631:Smith v. United States 623:United States v. Dixon 615:United States v. Felix 548:Burks v. United States 489:United States v. Dixon 481:United States v. Felix 446:Double Jeopardy Clause 210:William J. Brennan Jr. 1048:Berghuis v. Thompkins 888:Griffin v. California 760:United States v. Lara 658:United States v. Jorn 516:Ball v. United States 377:Hurtado v. California 293:Bonnie, R.J. et al. 944:Doe v. United States 811:Palko v. Connecticut 682:Blueford v. Arkansas 33:factual accuracy is 1040:Maryland v. Shatzer 1008:Missouri v. Seibert 960:McNeil v. Wisconsin 952:Illinois v. Perkins 912:Williams v. Florida 728:Bartkus v. Illinois 693:Multiple punishment 572:McElrath v. Georgia 254:Black (in judgment) 992:Chavez v. Martinez 928:Edwards v. Arizona 920:Michigan v. Tucker 896:Miranda v. Arizona 843:Benton v. Maryland 827:Baxstrom v. Herold 417:Beck v. Washington 350:criminal procedure 262:Baxstrom v. Herold 194:William O. Douglas 182:Associate Justices 136:86 S. Ct. 760; 15 82:Baxstrom v. Herold 1137: 1136: 1102: 1101: 1098: 1097: 1032:Florida v. Powell 904:Boulden v. Holman 857: 856: 853: 852: 736:Waller v. Florida 674:Oregon v. Kennedy 556:Evans v. Michigan 435: 434: 258: 257: 206:John M. Harlan II 74: 73: 66: 1202: 1158: 1151: 1144: 1116: 1109: 1080:Salinas v. Texas 936:Oregon v. Elstad 863: 803:Ex parte Bigelow 752:Heath v. Alabama 583:After conviction 454: 441: 359: 340: 333: 326: 317: 298: 291: 271:civil commitment 167:Court membership 156:Civil commitment 91: 90: 79: 69: 62: 58: 55: 49: 46:reliably sourced 26: 25: 18: 1210: 1209: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1105: 1103: 1094: 1072:Howes v. Fields 870: 849: 790: 707: 688: 637: 607:Grady v. Corbin 578: 540:Ashe v. Swenson 500:After acquittal 495: 473:Grady v. Corbin 448: 431: 367: 353: 344: 307: 302: 301: 292: 288: 283: 275:double jeopardy 269:that held that 220: 208: 196: 160:double jeopardy 145: 102: 96: 77: 70: 59: 53: 50: 39: 31:This article's 27: 23: 12: 11: 5: 1208: 1206: 1198: 1197: 1192: 1187: 1182: 1177: 1167: 1166: 1161: 1160: 1153: 1146: 1138: 1135: 1134: 1117: 1100: 1099: 1096: 1095: 1093: 1092: 1084: 1076: 1068: 1064:Bobby v. Dixon 1060: 1052: 1044: 1036: 1028: 1020: 1012: 1004: 996: 988: 980: 972: 964: 956: 948: 940: 932: 924: 916: 908: 900: 892: 884: 875: 872: 871: 866: 859: 858: 855: 854: 851: 850: 848: 847: 839: 831: 823: 815: 807: 798: 796: 792: 791: 789: 788: 780: 772: 764: 756: 748: 740: 732: 724: 715: 713: 709: 708: 706: 705: 696: 694: 690: 689: 687: 686: 678: 670: 662: 654: 645: 643: 642:After mistrial 639: 638: 636: 635: 627: 619: 611: 603: 595: 586: 584: 580: 579: 577: 576: 568: 560: 552: 544: 536: 528: 520: 512: 503: 501: 497: 496: 494: 493: 485: 477: 469: 460: 458: 450: 449: 444: 437: 436: 433: 432: 430: 429: 421: 413: 405: 401:Maxwell v. Dow 397: 389: 381: 372: 369: 368: 362: 355: 354: 345: 343: 342: 335: 328: 320: 314: 313: 306: 305:External links 303: 300: 299: 285: 284: 282: 279: 256: 255: 252: 248: 247: 244: 240: 239: 235: 234: 233: 232: 218:Potter Stewart 183: 180: 175: 169: 168: 164: 163: 152: 151: 147: 146: 135: 119: 115: 114: 109: 108:Full case name 105: 104: 98: 97: 92: 84: 83: 75: 72: 71: 30: 28: 21: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1207: 1196: 1193: 1191: 1188: 1186: 1183: 1181: 1178: 1176: 1173: 1172: 1170: 1159: 1154: 1152: 1147: 1145: 1140: 1139: 1133: 1131: 1127: 1123: 1118: 1115: 1111: 1106: 1090: 1089: 1088:Vega v. Tekoh 1085: 1082: 1081: 1077: 1074: 1073: 1069: 1066: 1065: 1061: 1058: 1057: 1053: 1050: 1049: 1045: 1042: 1041: 1037: 1034: 1033: 1029: 1026: 1025: 1021: 1018: 1017: 1013: 1010: 1009: 1005: 1002: 1001: 997: 994: 993: 989: 986: 985: 981: 978: 977: 973: 970: 969: 965: 962: 961: 957: 954: 953: 949: 946: 945: 941: 938: 937: 933: 930: 929: 925: 922: 921: 917: 914: 913: 909: 906: 905: 901: 898: 897: 893: 890: 889: 885: 882: 881: 877: 876: 873: 869: 864: 860: 845: 844: 840: 837: 836: 832: 829: 828: 824: 821: 820: 816: 813: 812: 808: 805: 804: 800: 799: 797: 793: 786: 785: 781: 778: 777: 773: 770: 769: 765: 762: 761: 757: 754: 753: 749: 746: 745: 741: 738: 737: 733: 730: 729: 725: 722: 721: 717: 716: 714: 710: 703: 702: 698: 697: 695: 691: 684: 683: 679: 676: 675: 671: 668: 667: 663: 660: 659: 655: 652: 651: 647: 646: 644: 640: 633: 632: 628: 625: 624: 620: 617: 616: 612: 609: 608: 604: 601: 600: 596: 593: 592: 588: 587: 585: 581: 574: 573: 569: 566: 565: 561: 558: 557: 553: 550: 549: 545: 542: 541: 537: 534: 533: 529: 526: 525: 521: 518: 517: 513: 510: 509: 505: 504: 502: 498: 491: 490: 486: 483: 482: 478: 475: 474: 470: 467: 466: 462: 461: 459: 455: 451: 447: 442: 438: 427: 426: 422: 419: 418: 414: 411: 410: 406: 403: 402: 398: 395: 394: 390: 387: 386: 385:Ex parte Bain 382: 379: 378: 374: 373: 370: 365: 360: 356: 351: 348: 341: 336: 334: 329: 327: 322: 321: 318: 312: 309: 308: 304: 296: 290: 287: 280: 278: 276: 272: 268: 264: 263: 253: 249: 245: 241: 238:Case opinions 236: 231: 227: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 199: 195: 191: 187: 184: 181: 179: 176: 174:Chief Justice 173: 172: 170: 165: 161: 157: 153: 148: 143: 139: 133: 132: 127: 124: 120: 116: 113: 110: 106: 99: 95: 85: 80: 68: 65: 57: 54:February 2021 47: 43: 37: 36: 29: 20: 19: 16: 1130:expanding it 1119: 1104: 1086: 1078: 1070: 1062: 1054: 1046: 1038: 1030: 1022: 1014: 1006: 998: 990: 982: 974: 966: 958: 950: 942: 934: 926: 918: 910: 902: 894: 886: 878: 841: 833: 826: 825: 817: 809: 801: 782: 774: 766: 758: 750: 742: 734: 726: 718: 699: 680: 672: 664: 656: 648: 629: 621: 613: 605: 597: 589: 570: 562: 554: 546: 538: 530: 522: 514: 506: 487: 479: 471: 463: 423: 415: 407: 399: 391: 383: 375: 294: 289: 277:principles. 261: 260: 259: 225: 213: 201: 198:Tom C. Clark 189: 129: 111: 60: 51: 32: 15: 251:Concurrence 222:Byron White 178:Earl Warren 1169:Categories 364:Grand Jury 281:References 230:Abe Fortas 186:Hugo Black 142:U.S. LEXIS 140:620; 1966 138:L. Ed. 2d 118:Citations 42:talk page 352:case law 243:Majority 35:disputed 150:Holding 1091:(2022) 1083:(2013) 1075:(2012) 1067:(2011) 1059:(2011) 1051:(2010) 1043:(2010) 1035:(2010) 1027:(2009) 1019:(2004) 1011:(2004) 1003:(2004) 995:(2003) 987:(2000) 979:(2000) 971:(1999) 963:(1991) 955:(1990) 947:(1988) 939:(1985) 931:(1981) 923:(1974) 915:(1970) 907:(1969) 899:(1966) 891:(1965) 883:(1957) 846:(1969) 838:(1969) 830:(1966) 822:(1947) 814:(1937) 806:(1885) 787:(2022) 779:(2019) 771:(2016) 763:(2004) 755:(1985) 747:(1978) 739:(1970) 731:(1959) 723:(1922) 704:(1932) 685:(2012) 677:(1982) 669:(1976) 661:(1971) 653:(1824) 634:(2023) 626:(1993) 618:(1992) 610:(1990) 602:(1976) 594:(1833) 575:(2024) 567:(2016) 559:(2013) 551:(1978) 543:(1970) 535:(1962) 527:(1906) 519:(1896) 511:(1834) 492:(1993) 484:(1992) 476:(1990) 468:(1932) 428:(2002) 420:(1962) 412:(1922) 404:(1900) 396:(1896) 388:(1887) 380:(1884) 366:Clause 228: 226:· 224:  216: 214:· 212:  204: 202:· 200:  192: 190:· 188:  1124:is a 795:Other 1126:stub 144:2214 131:more 123:U.S. 121:383 126:107 1171:: 1157:e 1150:t 1143:v 1132:. 339:e 332:t 325:v 162:. 134:) 128:( 67:) 61:( 56:) 52:( 48:. 38:.

Index

disputed
talk page
reliably sourced
Learn how and when to remove this message
Supreme Court of the United States
U.S.
107
more
L. Ed. 2d
U.S. LEXIS
Civil commitment
double jeopardy
Earl Warren
Hugo Black
William O. Douglas
Tom C. Clark
John M. Harlan II
William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart
Byron White
Abe Fortas
Supreme Court of the United States
civil commitment
double jeopardy
Full text of the opinion from Justia.com
v
t
e
United States Fifth Amendment
criminal procedure

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.