164:
43:
The court determined that the granting of an order of specific performance is entirely a matter of the discretion of the court. Apart from the rule that such discretion is to be exercised judicially upon all the relevant facts, no rules should be prescribed to regulate that discretion, as such rules
205:
239:
51:
regulating courts' discretion to order specific performance are predicated upon that remedy's availability by way of equitable relief only; they are inappropriate to
62:(granting an order of specific performance in an action for delivery of shares freely obtainable on the Stock Exchange) was by this reasoning confirmed.
234:
198:
244:
224:
191:
55:. The Appellate Division held, therefore, that the indiscriminate following of English cases in this regard is to be decried.
71:
25:
229:
128:
94:
44:
would inevitably curtail the court's discretion and negate or erode the plaintiff's right to select his remedy.
107:
29:
28:, particularly in the area of claims for specific performance. It was heard in the Appellate Division, by
171:
111:
52:
175:
218:
98:. Edited by Dale Hutchison, Chris-James Pretorius, Mark Townsend and Helena Janisch.
103:
37:
163:
48:
40:
and Cillié AJA, on 7 November 1985, with judgment handed down on 29 November.
33:
99:
179:
58:The decision of the Cape Provincial Division, in
199:
8:
206:
192:
125:Benson v SA Mutual Life Assurance Society
60:SA Mutual Life Assurance Society v Benson
21:Benson v SA Mutual Life Assurance Society
240:Appellate Division (South Africa) cases
141:
7:
160:
158:
95:The Law of Contract in South Africa
178:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
14:
162:
235:South African contract case law
1:
245:South African case law stubs
261:
157:
72:South African contract law
26:South African contract law
225:1985 in South African law
170:This article relating to
172:case law in South Africa
24:is an important case in
16:South African legal case
108:Oxford University Press
88:Du Plessis, Jacques,
148:1986 (1) SA 776 (A).
187:
186:
53:South African law
252:
230:1985 in case law
208:
201:
194:
166:
159:
149:
146:
260:
259:
255:
254:
253:
251:
250:
249:
215:
214:
213:
212:
155:
153:
152:
147:
143:
138:
121:
85:
80:
68:
17:
12:
11:
5:
258:
256:
248:
247:
242:
237:
232:
227:
217:
216:
211:
210:
203:
196:
188:
185:
184:
167:
151:
150:
140:
139:
137:
134:
133:
132:
120:
117:
116:
115:
84:
81:
79:
76:
75:
74:
67:
64:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
257:
246:
243:
241:
238:
236:
233:
231:
228:
226:
223:
222:
220:
209:
204:
202:
197:
195:
190:
189:
183:
181:
177:
173:
168:
165:
161:
156:
145:
142:
135:
130:
126:
123:
122:
118:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
96:
91:
87:
86:
82:
77:
73:
70:
69:
65:
63:
61:
56:
54:
50:
49:English rules
45:
41:
39:
35:
31:
27:
23:
22:
180:expanding it
169:
154:
144:
124:
104:Western Cape
93:
89:
59:
57:
46:
42:
32:, Kotzé JA,
20:
19:
18:
219:Categories
78:References
38:Galgut AJA
30:Corbett JA
127:1986 (1)
100:Cape Town
131:776 (A).
66:See also
34:Hefer JA
174:is a
136:Notes
119:Cases
90:et al
83:Books
176:stub
112:2010
47:The
221::
129:SA
110:,
106::
102:,
92:.
36:,
207:e
200:t
193:v
182:.
114:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
