Knowledge (XXG)

Bid rigging

Source đź“ť

323: 983:, in the real estate industry, may occur when the bank "tentatively" auctions a foreclosed home and gives bidders an option to give "preliminary bids" for homes that are not yet authorized for auction. If the reserve bids are not met, the home is updated as "never was available for auction" even though bids were received. Some houses are auctioned at fire-sale prices, and the auctions are closed before the auction was formally announced. Investors rush to get in their preliminary bids before the house is technically up for auction. Bidders fear losing options so it results in more bids, and naturally, higher prices. If bidders fail to reach the target bids, the item was never available for auction. Banks do that because if they unloaded all of their 1001:
behaviors, such as bid rigging, create market inefficiencies as contracts are fulfilled at elevated values. Furthermore, bid prices increase with more repeated collusion. Ultimately, the cost is typically borne by the taxpayer as government-sponsored contracts are artificially above market value. Additionally, it can be thought of as raising prices for the taxpayer (or consumer) as firms rent seek. One study found that bid rigging significantly raised prices over market value in the seafood industry in Philadelphia in a bidding scheme involving Defense Personnel Support Center, a purchaser for the Department of Defense. The high price of entry and fewer entrants in many industries results in lessened incentives for firms to behave competitively.
825:, for example in the case of government construction contracts. The typical objective of bid rigging is to enable the "winning" party to obtain contracts at uncompetitive prices (i.e., at higher prices if they are sellers, or lower prices if they are buyers). The other parties are compensated in various ways, for example, by cash payments, or by being designated to be the "winning" bidder on other contracts, or by an arrangement where some parts of the successful bidder's contract will be subcontracted to them. In this way, they "share the spoils" among themselves. Bid rigging almost always results in economic harm to the agency which is seeking the bids, and to the public, who ultimately bear the costs as taxpayers or consumers. 1189:
unit quotes. The fines from this bid rigging scheme amounted to €45 million following an initial court decision, an over-ruling, and a reinstatement of the initial verdict. In 2007, a Slovakian government ministry participated in bidder exclusion by posting a request for proposals regarding consulting on a bulletin board in an official building, though not open to the public. This resulted in a consulting firm winning a €120 million contract. The word for receiving kickbacks after participating in bid rigging is known as "tunelovanie" in Slovak.
1062:, or if there is reason to believe that officials and bidders are in contact, an open auction is preferred to sidestep potential bribery. When officials are engaged in more competitive procurement processes with regard to price but are suspected of kickbacks, a potential solution is the open auction to prevent clandestine arrangements such as change order abuse. If a closed or sealed auction process is preferred, the use of electronic bidding and investment in tamper-resistant systems is suggested. 931:, occurs when some of the bidders agree to submit bids that are intended to be unsuccessful so that another conspirator can win the contract. For example, the cover bids might contain prices that are uncompetitive in relation to the prices submitted by the conspirator, who is designated to win the contract, or the cover bids might contain conditions that the conspirators know to be unacceptable to the agency calling for the bids. 1228:"Indeed, the OFT uncovered evidence of cover pricing in over 4000 tenders involving over 1000 companies but had to focus its investigation on a limited number of companies and instances where the available evidence was strongest, in order to make best use of its resources and conclude its investigation within a reasonable timeframe. The OFT could not, therefore, pursue every firm suspected of involvement in cover pricing." 49: 1176:(TFEU). The annual cost to the EU in economic waste as a direct result of bid rigging among cartels was estimated to be between €13 billion and €37 billion in 2008. Bid rigging seems to be on the rise across Europe, raising concerns particularly over excessive expenditures and single-bid tenders. These single-bid tenders represented 17% of tenders in 2006, but 30% nine years later. 1305:
meaning that they were more likely to continue to win additional contracts in areas they were already developing. This was discovered to be a result of complementary bidding. Some legal action has been undertaken against these bid rigging schemes with nine contracting companies and several officials being charged and fined $ 5 billion in 1999.
1088:. Petrobras is suspected of having overcharged bids as much as 3% of the total cost on contracts with an alleged $ 2.1 billion being misappropriated in kickbacks. Operation Car Wash is part of a larger investigation into Brazil's government as well and has contributed to the conviction and imprisonment of former president 895:
simultaneously skimming profits from the artificially high bid price. Additionally, bidders may give low quotes for non-necessary items (knowledge gained through collusion or experience) to disadvantage other firms as their bid amount is more competitive. This also serves to increase the cost of entry for new firms.
1188:
Bid rigging is illegal in Slovakia under the Act on the Protection of Competition and by EU membership, also Article 101 of TFEU. The first charges to be brought to court in Slovakia in 2006 by the Antimonopoly Office involved six construction companies who submitted bids with suspiciously consistent
991:
Those forms of bid rigging can occur together, and two or more of the practices could occur at the same time. For example, if one member of the bidding ring is designated to win a particular contract, that bidder's conspirators could avoid winning by not bidding ("bid suppression") or by submitting a
1028:
At a very basic level, there would likely be more competitive bidding if there were more firms present in a market, outside of a cartel, as evidence shows that bids lessen in value as the number of firms rises. Furthermore, collusion becomes less frequent with better market competitiveness, a result
1000:
Many of the issues presented by bid rigging are the result of cartel involvement. Inefficient firms are not pushed out, as they would have been in a competitive market, and firms experience more profit, despite an inefficient allocation of resources. Cartels behave more like monopolies and so their
894:
involves high bid prices for commencing phases of development and low prices for later stages. That effectively increases the flow of funds for the bidding firm. This occurs when bidders cite high prices for items, intending to raise the number of units and purchase them at a competitive rate while
1304:
In a three-and-a-half-year period from 1995 to 1998 there was an estimated $ 4.13 billion surcharge attributed to bid rigging in Korea's construction industry, representing 15.5% of the total spent. It was also found that firms already present in an area enjoyed a significant degree of incumbency,
1276:
is often supported though as allowing small firms to continue to compete, though detractors are quick to point to the economic inefficiencies presented by a non-competitive market. The US Government, specifically the United States Trade Representative Office and Department of Commerce, made fierce
1260:
Although both a violation of Japanese criminal law and the Japan Anti-Monopoly Law, bid rigging is still a habitual practice of the Japanese construction industry. It has been shown by a number of academic studies both in Japan and in the US to be a system which considerably inflates the cost of
961:
are false bids to trick a legitimate bidder into bidding more than would have otherwise been the case. The seller or auctioneer hires confederates to call out the phantom bids. If the phantom bid is the winner, the lot is hidden and comes back around for a second auction, or the second-highest
937:
occurs when bidders take turns being the designated successful bidder. For example, each conspirator is designated to be the successful bidder on a certain contract, with conspirators designated to win other contracts. That is a form of market allocation in which the conspirators allocate or
1281:
as a de facto non-tariff barrier to foreign firms in the Japanese construction market. Despite years of negotiations, including promises by the Japanese government in the Structural Impediment Initiative (SII) trade talks, the practice was never fully stamped out and continued to flourish.
1126:
From 2002 until 2013, the Colombian government opened 121 investigations into bid rigging, which lead to sixty-nine entities paying fines amounting to nearly $ 23.5 million, with an additional nine entities receiving sanctions. Colombia was found to generally comply with the
868:
to reduce the minimum bid amount. That functions as contracts are split up to reduce the actual procurement amount and keep it under a threshold value. That reduces competitive bidding and enables less oversight at the project level as bid prices drop and kickbacks can be
1108:. This would not be the first instance of bid rigging by construction firms in recent Brazilian history as Andrade Gutierrez Engenharia SA, the nation's second largest construction firm, admitted to bid rigging during contract procurement for stadiums to host the 1271:
can be understood as a mutually beneficial system of bureaucracy and government and the private construction industry wherein bid rigging is incredibly common, benefiting colluding firms and officials alike in the form of kickbacks. The system of
881:
is another method for officials to choose the bidder of their choice but occurs after receipt of bids. The methods for this would include either changing bid parameters, evaluation processes, or other activity to effectively select the bidder of
938:
apportion markets, products, customers or geographic territories among themselves. This is then divided up such that each will get a "fair share" of the total business, without truly having to compete with the others for that business.
1235:
Many of the businesses involved cooperated fully with the OFT investigation and it was acknowledged that they had changed their bidding practices and provided staff training on competition law once the OFT had raised the issue.
1224:(OFT) on 103 construction companies found to have engaged in illegal bid-rigging schemes. The OFT commented that cover pricing, the form of bid rigging involved in these cases, was widespread in the UK construction industry. 1197:
Bid rigging occurs frequently in the construction industry in Switzerland. In 2007, seventeen different firms were involved in a bid rigging scheme but there was no prosecution as the ring had disbanded before
1173: 1103:
The Petrobras scandal extends beyond bid rigging in the oil sector as the investigation has also implicated Brazilian construction firms as bid rigging was discovered to be rampant in the preparations for the
842:
occurs when a contractor colludes with project officials, wins a low bid, and asks to change the contract afterwards. That is approved by officials, resulting in a much higher bid being retroactively approved.
1057:
Suggestions for ameliorating procurement auctions have also been put forth. Lengstein and Wolfstetter suggest that when a particular bidder is preferred, disregarding cost, possible reforms include a sealed
972:
is the strategy in which the auctioneer or seller bids on a lot and buys it back to protect it from being sold to the highest bidder for an insufficient price. That is fraud if the auction is advertised as
1881: 111: 2293:
in the cases of Quarmby Construction Company Limited and St James Securities Holdings Limited v Office of Fair Trading, unofficial summary published 15 April 2011, accessed 19 January 2024
851:
Instituting unreasonable qualification parameters, excluding non-preferred firms, or effectuating the same by shortening the time of acceptance periods for new bids following a request.
2015: 1025:
Bid rigging is an illegal practice under the criminal or competition laws of most developed countries. Depending on the jurisdiction, it is punishable by fines, imprisonment or both.
944:
can be a factor fostering the presence of bid rigging; for instance, it is the case of marketing agencies that bid for the same ad space on behalf of different and competing agents.).
1247:
figures for the wrong year when calculating fines, and treated the bid-rigging as more serious than it should have done, although in some other respects the OFT's ruling was upheld.
1205:, in 2011, a bid rigging scheme was discovered wherein seventeen firms were fined eight million Swiss francs though the appeals are ongoing. Multiple other cases are still ongoing. 1033: 962:
legitimate bidder is informed that the first bidder was unable to make payment. In online auctions, the latter ruse is pulled via a (secretly illegitimate) "second-chance offer."
2277: 1990: 2108: 888:
allow more bidder exclusion by officials by either tailoring requests to individual bidders or creating a vague criterion to reasonably choose a preferred bidder.
1232:
Cover pricing involves high price bidding, intended "to give the appearance of genuine competition", by businesses who, "in reality, ... are not competing".
2133: 1114: 289: 1843: 322: 2252:
Information note to procuring entities in the public and private sectors regarding the OFT’s decision on bid rigging in the construction industry
1199: 875:, which requires a relationship of some degree between the project and a bidder as the bidder is handed information to gain an unfair advantage. 537: 1885: 1053:
Reducing potential for communication between bidders and procurement officials and adhering to a strict criterion and process of evaluation.
809:
action which enables companies to submit non-competitive bids. It can be performed by corrupt officials, by firms in an orchestrated act of
1261:
construction projects, and in the Japanese public sector, considerably wasteful of annual tax money amounting to billions of Japanese yen.
901:
are bids chosen on criteria unrelated to their competitiveness. That can be performed blatantly, by falsifying bids, or by price splitting.
2464: 1296:
As of 2008, thirteen lawsuits were still pending over 1990s' bid rigging for local government contracts to supply incinerator plants.
2474: 1010: 789: 527: 258: 2038: 1017:
in 2016 aiming to promote good practice among procurement and supply staff, and detailing indications they should watch out for.
452: 2251: 447: 96: 502: 497: 2469: 2264: 1357:
Choi, Jin-Wook (2007). "Governance Structure and Administrative Corruption in Japan: An Organizational Network Approach".
1201:
In 2009, a ring of seven electricity firms from Bern were charged with bid rigging and fined two million Swiss francs. In
282: 201: 1898: 848:
allows project officials to essentially choose their bid. There are multiple methods to achieve that like the following:
2415:
Lee, In Kwon; Hahn, Kyungdong (2002). "Bid-Rigging in Auctions for Korean Public-Works Contracts and Potential Damage".
1148:. Even so, bid rigging is still rampant in the construction industry, auto sale auctions, and foreclosed home auctions. 1089: 722: 417: 1864: 1240: 577: 412: 2349: 1808:
Froeb, Luke M.; Koyak, Robert A.; Werden, Gregory J. (January 1993). "What is the effect of bid-rigging on prices?".
860:
Coercion and intimidation can also be used, as well as the simple rejection of individual bids over trivial matters.
987:
at once, the housing market would collapse, which causes foreclosed homes to be dribbled out with phantom auctions.
130: 65: 813:, or by officials and firms acting together. This form of collusion is illegal in most countries. It is a form of 2479: 1267:
refers to collusion in Japanese, or more precisely, "conference", and is an extremely prevalent system in Japan.
757: 2168: 1293:, resigned over a series of bid rigging allegations and was subsequently sentenced to over three years in jail. 917:
occurs when some of the conspirators agree not to submit bids to allow another conspirator to win the contract.
672: 275: 2324: 2290: 2280:
in the cases of G F Tomlinson Building and others, CAT 7, published 24 March 2011, accessed 16 January 2024
1765:
Gupta, Srabana (2001). "The Effect of Bid Rigging on Prices: A Study of the Highway Construction Industry".
657: 467: 782: 1221: 175: 854:
Advertising projects to select bidders or bidding markets, thereby reducing publicity of bid procurement.
1092:. In early January 2018, Petrobras settled a United States class action case for $ 2.95 billion, though 966:
is a legitimate bidder's best chance to foil a shill bidder who aims to drive up the price artificially.
717: 662: 622: 517: 512: 402: 377: 263: 1511: 1559: 1436:
Woodall, Brian (1993). "The Logic of Collusive Action: The Political Roots of Japan's Dango System".
1105: 507: 407: 218: 213: 101: 1112:. This revelation implicates an additional five domestic construction firms and was revealed by the 1290: 1214: 1109: 727: 652: 367: 350: 2189: 2440: 2160: 2087: 1947: 1790: 1744: 1719:
Black, William K. (October 2004). "The Dango Tango: Why Corruption Blocks Real Reform in Japan".
1698: 1607: 1461: 1403: 1334: 1081: 1047:
Maximizing the number of bids and potential contractors for enhanced competition among proposals.
974: 682: 522: 477: 237: 159: 2303: 2432: 2230: 2152: 2079: 2062:
Maci, Marsela (April 2012). "Private Enforcement in Bid-Rigging Cases in the European Union".
1939: 1825: 1782: 1736: 1631: 1487: 1453: 1395: 1374: 1180:
estimated that the overall annual cost posed to the EU by bid cost increases was $ 5 billion.
1144:
In the United States, bid rigging is a federal felony criminal offense under Section 1 of the
732: 687: 542: 472: 382: 362: 306: 223: 208: 91: 79: 28: 1415:
Porter, Robert; Zona, J. Douglas (1992). "Detection of Bid Rigging in Procurement Auctions".
2424: 2222: 2144: 2071: 1931: 1817: 1774: 1728: 1688: 1583: 1445: 1424: 1366: 1202: 1177: 775: 762: 677: 572: 492: 462: 457: 387: 232: 186: 182: 84: 2394: 2373: 1535: 1339: 1157: 1059: 963: 637: 602: 597: 592: 532: 487: 437: 432: 397: 345: 340: 191: 170: 116: 40: 1655: 1244: 1169: 1093: 742: 707: 647: 547: 442: 422: 392: 355: 139: 121: 1044:
Developing expertise and awareness of the market for which a tender is being designed.
2458: 2444: 2164: 2091: 1965: 1951: 1821: 1794: 1748: 1370: 1286: 822: 642: 427: 228: 196: 1702: 1277:
efforts in the late 1980s and early 1990s to urge the Japanese government to reform
1344: 984: 814: 697: 692: 667: 627: 582: 482: 242: 155: 106: 1386:
LaCasse, Chantale (1995). "Bid Rigging and the Threat of Government Prosecution".
48: 1156:
In Canada, bid rigging is an indictable criminal offence under Section 47 of the
1145: 1097: 1014: 806: 632: 567: 2075: 2428: 1778: 1329: 2436: 2395:"Builders settle damages suit over bid-rigging | The Japan Times Online" 2234: 2156: 2083: 1943: 1829: 1786: 1740: 1457: 1399: 1378: 2226: 1324: 1243:
revised the values of the fines. The tribunal decided that the OFT had used
1085: 810: 144: 74: 17: 2213:
Huschelrath, K. (2012-12-17). "Economic Approaches to Fight Bid Rigging".
1213:
In the United Kingdom, individuals can be prosecuted criminally under the
2148: 2134:"The First Bid Rigging Case in Slovakia after Years of Judicial Disputes" 1923: 1732: 1084:
is an ongoing investigation into the Brazilian semi-public multinational
818: 752: 70: 1935: 1407: 1314: 612: 557: 372: 330: 314: 2039:"Fighting Bid Rigging in Public Procurement in Colombia - 2014 - OECD" 1465: 1680: 1319: 907: 150: 1966:"Petrobras scandal | Summary, Explanation, & Operation Car Wash" 2016:"Brazil builder admits to World Cup stadium cartel in deal with..." 1991:"Petrobras to pay $ 2.95 billion to settle U.S. corruption lawsuit" 1693: 1449: 1899:"Guidelines for Fighting Bid Rigging in Public Procurement - OECD" 1428: 1174:
Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
1681:"Marketing agencies and collusive bidding in online ad auctions" 1423:. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research: 518–538. 1128: 1037: 1679:
Decarolis, Francesco; Goldmanis, Maris; Penta, Antonio (2017).
1239:
The fines were subsequently deemed to be "excessive" and the
47: 975:
an absolute auction, meaning that there are no reserve bids
1844:"Checklist to design tender methods to reduce bid rigging" 1038:
its work on bid-rigging and cartels in public procurement
1100:
had expected a settlement between $ 5 and $ 10 billion.
1131:'s recommendations regarding competitive procurement. 1040:, makes the following suggestions for better tenders: 1034:
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
1760: 1758: 2254:, published 22 September 2009, accessed 27 May 2024 2215:Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 1656:"Potential Scheme: Unjustified Sole Source Awards" 1865:CMA publishes guidance to help detect bid-rigging 1050:Striving for clarity in requirements and details. 1685:National Bureau of Economic Research, No. W23962 1922:Lengwiler, Yvan; Wolfstetter, Elmar G. (2006). 1512:"Potential Scheme: Excluding Qualified Bidders" 1226: 1560:"Potential Scheme: Leaking of Bid Information" 2289:Registry of the Competition Appeal Tribunal, 817:and market allocation, often practiced where 783: 283: 8: 2267:, published March 2024, accessed 27 May 2024 1115:Conselho Administrativo de Defesa EconĂ´mica 790: 776: 301: 290: 276: 36: 2132:Blaao, Ondrej; Sramelova, Silvia (2015). 1888:on 24 June 2016, accessed 18 January 2024 1692: 1608:"Potential Scheme: Rigged Specifications" 857:Bundling of contracts to exclude bidders. 251:Enforcement authorities and organizations 1584:"Potential Scheme: Manipulation of Bids" 1479: 741: 706: 611: 556: 329: 313: 250: 129: 57: 39: 2246: 2244: 1884:, published 20 June 2016, archived by 1632:"Potential Scheme: Unbalanced Bidding" 1488:"Potential Scheme: Change Order Abuse" 27:For the New Jersey investigation, see 2397:. Search.japantimes.co.jp. 2009-04-04 2376:. Search.japantimes.co.jp. 2009-03-28 2183: 2181: 2103: 2101: 1714: 1712: 7: 1924:"Corruption in Procurement Auctions" 2291:Judgment (Non-confidential version) 2190:"E.U. Cash Tunnel Ends in Slovakia" 2188:Castle, Stephen (9 November 2010). 1882:Detecting and deterring bid-rigging 1880:Competition and Markets Authority, 1536:"Potential Scheme: Split Purchases" 949:As a seller, auctioneer or official 1220:In 2011, fines were levied by the 1029:of reduced ability to compromise. 25: 2417:Review of Industrial Organization 2325:"New York Times report from 1995" 2304:"US Department of Justice report" 1767:Review of Industrial Organization 1011:Competition and Markets Authority 259:International Competition Network 1371:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00779.x 321: 1168:Bid rigging is illegal in the 899:Unjustified sole source awards 264:List of competition regulators 1: 2276:Competition Appeal Tribunal, 1388:The RAND Journal of Economics 2064:European Competition Journal 1822:10.1016/0165-1765(93)90095-t 1417:Journal of Political Economy 1359:Public Administration Review 992:high bid ("cover bidding"). 805:is a fraudulent scheme in a 1241:Competition Appeal Tribunal 2496: 2465:Anti-competitive practices 2076:10.5235/174410512800369973 1871:, accessed 18 January 2024 1066:Notable examples by region 873:Leaking of bid information 131:Anti-competitive practices 97:Herfindahl–Hirschman index 66:History of competition law 26: 2265:Cartels and Cover Pricing 2141:SSRN Working Paper Series 1928:SSRN Working Paper Series 1721:Business Ethics Quarterly 1090:Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva 915:Bid suppression collusion 758:Private electronic market 34:Form of procurement fraud 2475:Organized crime activity 2250:Office of Fair Trading, 1687:. Working Paper Series. 453:Generalized second-price 2429:10.1023/a:1016018505021 2306:. Usdoj.gov. 1994-09-16 1970:Encyclopedia Britannica 1779:10.1023/a:1012568509136 1289:, the then governor of 448:Generalized first-price 1230: 1222:Office of Fair Trading 503:Simultaneous ascending 176:Occupational licensing 52: 2227:10.1093/jeclap/lps071 1886:The National Archives 1444:(3). JSTOR: 297–312. 1394:(3). Wiley: 398–417. 1365:(5). Wiley: 930–942. 921:Complementary bidding 886:Rigged Specifications 834:As acts of corruption 538:Vickrey–Clarke–Groves 51: 2470:Conflict of interest 2374:"Japan Times report" 2149:10.2139/ssrn.2741673 1733:10.5840/beq200414442 1438:Comparative Politics 1106:2016 Summer Olympics 821:are determined by a 418:Discriminatory price 219:Occupational closure 214:Dividing territories 202:Essential facilities 102:Market concentration 2350:"Britanica Article" 1936:10.2139/ssrn.874705 1291:Miyazaki Prefecture 1215:Enterprise Act 2002 1110:2014 FIFA World Cup 728:Revenue equivalence 413:Deferred-acceptance 2329:The New York Times 2194:The New York Times 2109:"Rigging the bids" 1989:Pierson, Brendan. 1335:Operation Car Wash 1082:Operation Car Wash 892:Unbalanced bidding 866:Purchase splitting 840:Change order abuse 498:Sealed first-price 238:Regulatory capture 53: 1810:Economics Letters 800: 799: 578:Cancellation hunt 528:Value of revenues 398:Click-box bidding 300: 299: 229:Misuse of patents 224:Predatory pricing 209:Exclusive dealing 92:Barriers to entry 80:Coercive monopoly 29:Operation Bid Rig 16:(Redirected from 2487: 2480:Bidding strategy 2449: 2448: 2412: 2406: 2405: 2403: 2402: 2391: 2385: 2384: 2382: 2381: 2370: 2364: 2363: 2361: 2360: 2346: 2340: 2339: 2337: 2336: 2321: 2315: 2314: 2312: 2311: 2300: 2294: 2287: 2281: 2274: 2268: 2261: 2255: 2248: 2239: 2238: 2210: 2204: 2203: 2201: 2200: 2185: 2176: 2175: 2173: 2167:. Archived from 2138: 2129: 2123: 2122: 2120: 2119: 2105: 2096: 2095: 2059: 2053: 2052: 2050: 2049: 2035: 2029: 2028: 2026: 2025: 2011: 2005: 2004: 2002: 2001: 1986: 1980: 1979: 1977: 1976: 1962: 1956: 1955: 1919: 1913: 1912: 1910: 1909: 1895: 1889: 1878: 1872: 1861: 1855: 1854: 1848: 1840: 1834: 1833: 1805: 1799: 1798: 1762: 1753: 1752: 1716: 1707: 1706: 1696: 1676: 1670: 1669: 1667: 1666: 1652: 1646: 1645: 1643: 1642: 1628: 1622: 1621: 1619: 1618: 1604: 1598: 1597: 1595: 1594: 1580: 1574: 1573: 1571: 1570: 1556: 1550: 1549: 1547: 1546: 1532: 1526: 1525: 1523: 1522: 1508: 1502: 1501: 1499: 1498: 1484: 1469: 1432: 1411: 1382: 981:Phantom auctions 929:courtesy bidding 923:, also known as 879:Bid manipulation 846:Bidder exclusion 792: 785: 778: 723:Price of anarchy 573:Calor licitantis 325: 302: 292: 285: 278: 183:Product bundling 85:Natural monopoly 37: 21: 2495: 2494: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2414: 2413: 2409: 2400: 2398: 2393: 2392: 2388: 2379: 2377: 2372: 2371: 2367: 2358: 2356: 2348: 2347: 2343: 2334: 2332: 2323: 2322: 2318: 2309: 2307: 2302: 2301: 2297: 2288: 2284: 2275: 2271: 2262: 2258: 2249: 2242: 2212: 2211: 2207: 2198: 2196: 2187: 2186: 2179: 2171: 2136: 2131: 2130: 2126: 2117: 2115: 2107: 2106: 2099: 2061: 2060: 2056: 2047: 2045: 2037: 2036: 2032: 2023: 2021: 2013: 2012: 2008: 1999: 1997: 1988: 1987: 1983: 1974: 1972: 1964: 1963: 1959: 1921: 1920: 1916: 1907: 1905: 1897: 1896: 1892: 1879: 1875: 1862: 1858: 1846: 1842: 1841: 1837: 1807: 1806: 1802: 1764: 1763: 1756: 1718: 1717: 1710: 1678: 1677: 1673: 1664: 1662: 1660:guide.iacrc.org 1654: 1653: 1649: 1640: 1638: 1636:guide.iacrc.org 1630: 1629: 1625: 1616: 1614: 1612:guide.iacrc.org 1606: 1605: 1601: 1592: 1590: 1588:guide.iacrc.org 1582: 1581: 1577: 1568: 1566: 1564:guide.iacrc.org 1558: 1557: 1553: 1544: 1542: 1540:guide.iacrc.org 1534: 1533: 1529: 1520: 1518: 1516:guide.iacrc.org 1510: 1509: 1505: 1496: 1494: 1492:guide.iacrc.org 1486: 1485: 1481: 1476: 1435: 1414: 1385: 1356: 1353: 1351:Further reading 1340:Organized crime 1311: 1302: 1258: 1253: 1211: 1195: 1186: 1166: 1158:Competition Act 1154: 1142: 1137: 1124: 1078: 1073: 1068: 1060:Vickrey auction 1023: 1009:In the UK, the 1007: 998: 951: 911: 836: 831: 796: 767: 737: 702: 607: 603:Tacit collusion 552: 468:Multi-attribute 296: 192:Refusal to deal 171:Tacit collusion 117:Relevant market 41:Competition law 35: 32: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 2493: 2491: 2483: 2482: 2477: 2472: 2467: 2457: 2456: 2451: 2450: 2407: 2386: 2365: 2354:Britannica.com 2341: 2316: 2295: 2282: 2269: 2263:Wedlake Bell, 2256: 2240: 2221:(2): 185–191. 2205: 2177: 2174:on 2020-01-01. 2124: 2097: 2070:(1): 211–227. 2054: 2030: 2006: 1981: 1957: 1914: 1890: 1873: 1856: 1835: 1816:(4): 419–423. 1800: 1773:(4): 451–465. 1754: 1727:(4): 603–623. 1708: 1694:10.3386/w23962 1671: 1647: 1623: 1599: 1575: 1551: 1527: 1503: 1478: 1477: 1475: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1450:10.2307/422247 1433: 1412: 1383: 1352: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1342: 1337: 1332: 1327: 1322: 1317: 1310: 1307: 1301: 1298: 1257: 1254: 1252: 1249: 1210: 1209:United Kingdom 1207: 1194: 1191: 1185: 1182: 1170:European Union 1165: 1162: 1153: 1150: 1141: 1138: 1136: 1133: 1123: 1120: 1077: 1074: 1072: 1069: 1067: 1064: 1055: 1054: 1051: 1048: 1045: 1022: 1019: 1006: 1003: 997: 996:Economic costs 994: 989: 988: 978: 967: 950: 947: 946: 945: 942:Bid delegation 939: 932: 918: 910: 904: 903: 902: 896: 889: 883: 876: 870: 863: 862: 861: 858: 855: 852: 843: 835: 832: 830: 827: 798: 797: 795: 794: 787: 780: 772: 769: 768: 766: 765: 760: 755: 749: 746: 745: 739: 738: 736: 735: 733:Winner's curse 730: 725: 720: 714: 711: 710: 704: 703: 701: 700: 695: 690: 685: 680: 675: 670: 665: 660: 655: 650: 645: 640: 635: 630: 625: 619: 616: 615: 609: 608: 606: 605: 600: 595: 590: 585: 580: 575: 570: 564: 561: 560: 554: 553: 551: 550: 545: 540: 535: 530: 525: 520: 515: 510: 505: 500: 495: 490: 485: 480: 475: 470: 465: 460: 455: 450: 445: 440: 435: 430: 425: 420: 415: 410: 405: 400: 395: 390: 385: 380: 375: 370: 365: 360: 359: 358: 353: 348: 337: 334: 333: 327: 326: 318: 317: 311: 310: 298: 297: 295: 294: 287: 280: 272: 269: 268: 267: 266: 261: 253: 252: 248: 247: 246: 245: 240: 235: 226: 221: 216: 211: 206: 205: 204: 199: 189: 180: 179: 178: 173: 168: 163: 153: 142: 140:Monopolization 134: 133: 127: 126: 125: 124: 122:Merger control 119: 114: 109: 104: 99: 94: 89: 88: 87: 82: 68: 60: 59: 58:Basic concepts 55: 54: 44: 43: 33: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2492: 2481: 2478: 2476: 2473: 2471: 2468: 2466: 2463: 2462: 2460: 2446: 2442: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2411: 2408: 2396: 2390: 2387: 2375: 2369: 2366: 2355: 2351: 2345: 2342: 2330: 2326: 2320: 2317: 2305: 2299: 2296: 2292: 2286: 2283: 2279: 2273: 2270: 2266: 2260: 2257: 2253: 2247: 2245: 2241: 2236: 2232: 2228: 2224: 2220: 2216: 2209: 2206: 2195: 2191: 2184: 2182: 2178: 2170: 2166: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2135: 2128: 2125: 2114: 2113:The Economist 2110: 2104: 2102: 2098: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2058: 2055: 2044: 2040: 2034: 2031: 2020: 2017: 2010: 2007: 1996: 1992: 1985: 1982: 1971: 1967: 1961: 1958: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1918: 1915: 1904: 1900: 1894: 1891: 1887: 1883: 1877: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1860: 1857: 1852: 1845: 1839: 1836: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1804: 1801: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1761: 1759: 1755: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1715: 1713: 1709: 1704: 1700: 1695: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1675: 1672: 1661: 1657: 1651: 1648: 1637: 1633: 1627: 1624: 1613: 1609: 1603: 1600: 1589: 1585: 1579: 1576: 1565: 1561: 1555: 1552: 1541: 1537: 1531: 1528: 1517: 1513: 1507: 1504: 1493: 1489: 1483: 1480: 1473: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1434: 1430: 1429:10.3386/w4013 1426: 1422: 1418: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1355: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1343: 1341: 1338: 1336: 1333: 1331: 1328: 1326: 1323: 1321: 1318: 1316: 1313: 1312: 1308: 1306: 1299: 1297: 1294: 1292: 1288: 1287:Tadahiro Ando 1283: 1280: 1275: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1255: 1250: 1248: 1246: 1242: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1223: 1218: 1216: 1208: 1206: 1204: 1200: 1192: 1190: 1183: 1181: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1163: 1161: 1159: 1151: 1149: 1147: 1140:United States 1139: 1135:North America 1134: 1132: 1130: 1121: 1119: 1118: 1116: 1111: 1107: 1101: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1075: 1071:South America 1070: 1065: 1063: 1061: 1052: 1049: 1046: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1039: 1035: 1030: 1026: 1020: 1018: 1016: 1013:published an 1012: 1004: 1002: 995: 993: 986: 982: 979: 976: 971: 968: 965: 960: 956: 953: 952: 948: 943: 940: 936: 933: 930: 926: 925:cover bidding 922: 919: 916: 913: 912: 909: 905: 900: 897: 893: 890: 887: 884: 880: 877: 874: 871: 867: 864: 859: 856: 853: 850: 849: 847: 844: 841: 838: 837: 833: 828: 826: 824: 823:call for bids 820: 816: 812: 808: 804: 793: 788: 786: 781: 779: 774: 773: 771: 770: 764: 761: 759: 756: 754: 751: 750: 748: 747: 744: 740: 734: 731: 729: 726: 724: 721: 719: 718:Digital goods 716: 715: 713: 712: 709: 705: 699: 696: 694: 691: 689: 686: 684: 681: 679: 676: 674: 671: 669: 666: 664: 661: 659: 656: 654: 651: 649: 646: 644: 641: 639: 636: 634: 631: 629: 626: 624: 621: 620: 618: 617: 614: 610: 604: 601: 599: 596: 594: 591: 589: 586: 584: 581: 579: 576: 574: 571: 569: 566: 565: 563: 562: 559: 555: 549: 546: 544: 541: 539: 536: 534: 531: 529: 526: 524: 521: 519: 518:Uniform price 516: 514: 513:Traffic light 511: 509: 506: 504: 501: 499: 496: 494: 491: 489: 486: 484: 481: 479: 476: 474: 471: 469: 466: 464: 461: 459: 456: 454: 451: 449: 446: 444: 441: 439: 436: 434: 431: 429: 426: 424: 421: 419: 416: 414: 411: 409: 406: 404: 403:Combinatorial 401: 399: 396: 394: 391: 389: 386: 384: 381: 379: 378:Best/not best 376: 374: 373:Barter double 371: 369: 366: 364: 361: 357: 354: 352: 349: 347: 344: 343: 342: 339: 338: 336: 335: 332: 328: 324: 320: 319: 316: 312: 308: 304: 303: 293: 288: 286: 281: 279: 274: 273: 271: 270: 265: 262: 260: 257: 256: 255: 254: 249: 244: 241: 239: 236: 234: 230: 227: 225: 222: 220: 217: 215: 212: 210: 207: 203: 200: 198: 197:Group boycott 195: 194: 193: 190: 188: 184: 181: 177: 174: 172: 169: 167: 164: 161: 157: 154: 152: 149:Formation of 148: 147: 146: 143: 141: 138: 137: 136: 135: 132: 128: 123: 120: 118: 115: 113: 110: 108: 105: 103: 100: 98: 95: 93: 90: 86: 83: 81: 78: 77: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 62: 61: 56: 50: 46: 45: 42: 38: 30: 19: 2423:(1): 73–88. 2420: 2416: 2410: 2399:. Retrieved 2389: 2378:. Retrieved 2368: 2357:. Retrieved 2353: 2344: 2333:. Retrieved 2331:. 1995-03-09 2328: 2319: 2308:. Retrieved 2298: 2285: 2272: 2259: 2218: 2214: 2208: 2197:. Retrieved 2193: 2169:the original 2140: 2127: 2116:. Retrieved 2112: 2067: 2063: 2057: 2046:. Retrieved 2043:www.oecd.org 2042: 2033: 2022:. Retrieved 2018: 2009: 1998:. Retrieved 1994: 1984: 1973:. Retrieved 1969: 1960: 1927: 1917: 1906:. Retrieved 1903:www.oecd.org 1902: 1893: 1876: 1868: 1859: 1850: 1838: 1813: 1809: 1803: 1770: 1766: 1724: 1720: 1684: 1674: 1663:. Retrieved 1659: 1650: 1639:. Retrieved 1635: 1626: 1615:. Retrieved 1611: 1602: 1591:. Retrieved 1587: 1578: 1567:. Retrieved 1563: 1554: 1543:. Retrieved 1539: 1530: 1519:. Retrieved 1515: 1506: 1495:. Retrieved 1491: 1482: 1441: 1437: 1420: 1416: 1391: 1387: 1362: 1358: 1345:Price fixing 1303: 1295: 1284: 1278: 1273: 1268: 1264: 1263: 1259: 1238: 1234: 1231: 1227: 1219: 1212: 1196: 1187: 1167: 1155: 1143: 1125: 1113: 1102: 1079: 1056: 1031: 1027: 1024: 1008: 999: 990: 985:toxic assets 980: 969: 958: 955:Phantom bids 954: 941: 935:Bid rotation 934: 928: 924: 920: 914: 898: 891: 885: 878: 872: 865: 845: 839: 815:price fixing 802: 801: 653:Domain names 587: 508:Single-price 408:Common value 243:Rent-seeking 165: 156:Price fixing 107:Market power 2014:Mano, Ana. 1193:Switzerland 1172:(EU) under 1146:Sherman Act 1098:BTG Pactual 1036:(OECD), in 1021:Remediation 1015:open letter 807:procurement 803:Bid rigging 368:Anglo-Dutch 351:Bidding fee 166:Bid rigging 18:Bid-rigging 2459:Categories 2401:2011-12-17 2380:2011-12-17 2359:2011-12-17 2335:2011-12-17 2310:2011-12-17 2199:2018-09-11 2118:2018-09-11 2048:2018-09-11 2024:2018-09-11 2000:2018-09-11 1975:2018-09-11 1908:2018-09-11 1863:Cave, B., 1665:2018-09-11 1641:2018-09-11 1617:2018-09-11 1593:2018-09-11 1569:2018-09-11 1545:2018-09-11 1521:2018-09-11 1497:2018-09-11 1474:References 1330:Corruption 1198:colluding. 959:shill bids 623:Algorithms 523:Unique bid 478:No-reserve 233:copyrights 112:SSNIP test 2445:153429133 2437:0889-938X 2235:2041-7764 2165:159767037 2157:1556-5068 2092:154382209 2084:1744-1056 1952:167452901 1944:1556-5068 1830:0165-1765 1795:153988096 1787:0889-938X 1749:146369439 1741:1052-150X 1458:0010-4159 1400:0741-6261 1379:0033-3352 1325:Collusion 1285:In 2006, 1094:JP Morgan 1086:Petrobras 1080:Brazil's 1005:Detection 906:Within a 869:allotted. 819:contracts 811:collusion 688:Virginity 543:Walrasian 473:Multiunit 383:Brazilian 363:Amsterdam 145:Collusion 75:oligopoly 2278:Judgment 1869:Lexology 1703:44056837 1309:See also 1245:turnover 1184:Slovakia 1122:Colombia 970:Buy-back 763:Software 753:Ebidding 678:Spectrum 643:Children 613:Contexts 493:Scottish 463:Knapsack 458:Japanese 388:Calcutta 315:Auctions 307:a series 305:Part of 71:Monopoly 1853:. 2009. 1408:2555995 1315:Bribery 1117:(CADE). 964:Sniping 882:choice. 658:Flowers 648:Players 638:Charity 598:Suicide 593:Sniping 588:Rigging 568:Shading 558:Bidding 533:Vickrey 488:Reverse 438:Forward 433:English 346:Chinese 341:All-pay 151:cartels 2443:  2435:  2233:  2163:  2155:  2090:  2082:  1950:  1942:  1828:  1793:  1785:  1747:  1739:  1701:  1466:422247 1464:  1456:  1406:  1398:  1377:  1320:Cartel 1203:Aargau 1164:Europe 1152:Canada 1076:Brazil 908:cartel 743:Online 708:Theory 683:Stamps 673:Slaves 548:Yankee 443:French 423:Double 393:Candle 356:Dollar 2441:S2CID 2172:(PDF) 2161:S2CID 2137:(PDF) 2088:S2CID 1948:S2CID 1847:(PDF) 1791:S2CID 1745:S2CID 1699:S2CID 1462:JSTOR 1404:JSTOR 1300:Korea 1279:dango 1274:dango 1269:Dango 1265:Dango 1256:Japan 829:Forms 698:Wives 663:Loans 628:Autos 428:Dutch 331:Types 187:tying 160:cases 2433:ISSN 2231:ISSN 2153:ISSN 2080:ISSN 1940:ISSN 1851:OECD 1826:ISSN 1783:ISSN 1737:ISSN 1454:ISSN 1396:ISSN 1375:ISSN 1251:Asia 1178:RAND 1129:OECD 1096:and 1032:The 693:Wine 668:Scam 583:Jump 483:Rank 231:and 185:and 73:and 2425:doi 2223:doi 2145:doi 2072:doi 2019:U.S 1995:U.S 1932:doi 1818:doi 1775:doi 1729:doi 1689:doi 1446:doi 1425:doi 1421:101 1367:doi 957:or 927:or 633:Art 2461:: 2439:. 2431:. 2421:21 2419:. 2352:. 2327:. 2243:^ 2229:. 2217:. 2192:. 2180:^ 2159:. 2151:. 2143:. 2139:. 2111:. 2100:^ 2086:. 2078:. 2066:. 2041:. 1993:. 1968:. 1946:. 1938:. 1930:. 1926:. 1901:. 1867:, 1849:. 1824:. 1814:42 1812:. 1789:. 1781:. 1771:19 1769:. 1757:^ 1743:. 1735:. 1725:14 1723:. 1711:^ 1697:. 1683:. 1658:. 1634:. 1610:. 1586:. 1562:. 1538:. 1514:. 1490:. 1460:. 1452:. 1442:25 1440:. 1419:. 1402:. 1392:26 1390:. 1373:. 1363:67 1361:. 1217:. 1160:. 309:on 2447:. 2427:: 2404:. 2383:. 2362:. 2338:. 2313:. 2237:. 2225:: 2219:4 2202:. 2147:: 2121:. 2094:. 2074:: 2068:8 2051:. 2027:. 2003:. 1978:. 1954:. 1934:: 1911:. 1832:. 1820:: 1797:. 1777:: 1751:. 1731:: 1705:. 1691:: 1668:. 1644:. 1620:. 1596:. 1572:. 1548:. 1524:. 1500:. 1468:. 1448:: 1431:. 1427:: 1410:. 1381:. 1369:: 977:. 791:e 784:t 777:v 291:e 284:t 277:v 162:) 158:( 31:. 20:)

Index

Bid-rigging
Operation Bid Rig
Competition law

History of competition law
Monopoly
oligopoly
Coercive monopoly
Natural monopoly
Barriers to entry
Herfindahl–Hirschman index
Market concentration
Market power
SSNIP test
Relevant market
Merger control
Anti-competitive practices
Monopolization
Collusion
cartels
Price fixing
cases
Bid rigging
Tacit collusion
Occupational licensing
Product bundling
tying
Refusal to deal
Group boycott
Essential facilities

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑