658:
for repayment of a bond amounting to £2,371. Evidently he had been paid partly in deferred bonds, which he now wanted repaid. The directors saw that this was completely beyond the company’s means, and Ridley was awarded a judgment in
Chancery against the company. However as the company had no realisable assets other than what was directly involved in operating as a railway, the judgment did not compel any action. For the time being Ridley did not get his money, and the company was now in a state of suspense, unable to incur new expense. The directors had opened discussions with the LSWR about the larger company buying the BWR out, but this legal situation meant that the LSWR was unwilling to take the matter further until it was resolved. The LSWR continued working the line, but now retained all the receipts, towards money owed to it.
805:
349:
279:
781:
769:
237:
793:
230:
392:
371:
210:
378:
385:
327:
301:
257:
586:
622:
only if a formal undertaking to use only tank engines, not tender engines, were submitted by the company. For some reason they had failed to formalise the undertaking, and Rich recommended (by letter dated 29 May 1863) refusal of the authorisation of opening, until the document was supplied. The following day the company supplied the necessary undertaking.
654:
funds to discharge” the debt. He was offered preference shares in payment, but as the company was making no profit after paying loan interest, and Taylor saw that preference shares were worthless. He wisely declined. When he pressed for payment again in May, the directors paid him out of their own pockets to “meet the emergency”.
562:, on the LBSCR fitted the objective neatly. A 23 mile line would cost ÂŁ26,000. This went to Parliament in the 1861 session, and was subject to strong opposition from the LSWR, who saw it as an obvious attempt by the LBSCR to get access into Southampton. The bill was thrown out, to the surprise of the Petersfield promoters.
693:, but had been taken off because of complaints about inadequate accommodation and poor ventilation. They were therefore available to work on the Bishop's Waltham line. In 1905 they operated 13 up and 12 down services; there was also an engine-worked goods trip. In 1907 a Sunday service was finally reinstated.
668:
The situation, unsatisfactory as it was, continued until 1881, with the company lacking directors or senior officials. The LSWR was unwilling for the branch line it operated to drift indefinitely, and on 11 May 1881 it indicated that it had reached agreement with the contractor creditors, and that it
608:
miles. The Bishop's
Waltham delegation agreed to this arrangement, and the LSWR withdrew its objection. The name of the BWB&BR proposal was altered to the Bishop's Waltham Railway Company, and the bill passed Parliament unopposed, the act of Parliament being dated 17 July 1862. Authorised capital
653:
The company struggled to make a profit, and was certainly unable to pay dividends to shareholders. A Mr Taylor had acted as the company’s architect, and in
February 1865 had asked for payment of his fee of £211 19s 0d. The company refused to pay him, due to the “inability of the Company from want of
612:
The local company had struggled with controlling contracts and finding the funds for construction of the line, and had long deferred arranging for building the Bishop's
Waltham station, intending to make a temporary station later. Now as the line neared completion it was necessary to arrange quickly
553:
The
Petersfield Railway had been in discussion with the Chamber of Commerce in Southampton, where there was dissatisfaction with the LSWR. The ill-feeling was against it as a monopoly rail transport provider, and the potential to connect from Southampton to more easterly regions appeared attractive.
661:
The Sunday train service was withdrawn as a means of economy, but much worse was to come. The Bishop's
Waltham Clay Company, which had been a major mineral forwarder from pits at Bishop's Waltham, went into liquidation. Then in early 1867 a man called Rilson, a partner of the contractor Ridley, now
657:
In
January 1866 the LSWR recommended the construction of an engine shed at Bishop's Waltham, but the cost at £500 was quite out of the BWR Company’s power. There were a number of other difficulties of this kind, but one of the contractors for the construction of the line named Ridley placed a claim
621:
made the necessary inspection of the line to approve it for passenger operation. Although there were some minor deficiencies, Rich was prepared to accept the company’s undertaking that they would be dealt with without delay. However there were no turntables on the line; this would be acceptable but
630:
Accordingly on 1 June 1863 the line was opened, worked by the LSWR. A train service of six trains each way daily, three on
Sundays, was instituted. Steps were now taken to provide permanent passenger and goods accommodation at Bishop's Waltham, but difficulty with groundworks and the necessity to
644:
direction. The LSWR were against it at first, but later withdrew their opposition, and the
Petersfield and Bishop's Waltham Railway was authorised by act of Parliament of 29 July 1864. In fact the state of the money market turned so difficult that the company was unable to raise subscriptions to
828:
Both Carter and Grant erroneously state that the line first carried passengers in 1900 after being granted a Light
Railway Order. This is incorrect, stemming from confusion with a later proposal that was authorised, but never implemented. The Bishop's Waltham Railway carried passengers from the
529:
Bishop's Waltham was predominantly agricultural, although some brewing and flour milling had taken place. By 1860 much of the railway network of Great Britain had been constructed, and it was plain that a small community without a railway connection was at a major economic and commercial
474:
Passenger business was never heavy, but clay pits and a brickworks and gasworks at Bishop's Waltham brought mineral traffic to the line. Nevertheless the BWR Company was always short of money and had to be supported by the LSWR, and was absorbed by the larger company in 1881.
639:
In 1863 a Petersfield and Bishop's Waltham Railway was proposed. This would approach Bishop's Waltham from the north-east, opposite the approach from Botley. The BWR must have assumed this would increase traffic on their line, making it a through railway accessible from the
721:
Passenger and goods business had declined substantially since the 1920s, as road transport became more efficient. In addition passengers from Bishop's Waltham to the large towns of Portsmouth and Southampton needed to change trains twice, at Botley and again at Fareham or
696:
On 23 December 1909 a new halt was opened at Durley Mill; it is likely that the low cost of halts for railmotors, which were able to set passengers down at ground level, led to this move. The railmotors were taken off in 1915 and conventional trains were resumed.
593:
The LSWR made it clear it would oppose the bill in Parliament, and the BWB&BR directors negotiated with the LSWR. The latter agreed to withdraw its opposition if the Bishop's Waltham scheme omitted the Bursledon extension, reducing the line to a length of
726:. From 1 February 1931 the Sunday train service was withdrawn, and evening weekday services were reduced. After the last train on 31 December 1932 the passenger train service was completely withdrawn. So the line was closed on 2 January 1933
669:
was in a position to purchase the BWR for ÂŁ22,000. The transfer was agreed and for accounting purposes considered to have taken place on 4 August 1881, sanctioned retrospectively by agreements later in the same year.
737:
Passenger traffic had dwindled so far that services ceased in 1932, but freight trains ran a service three times a week until 1962. Goods train usage declined as well, and the last goods train ran on 27 April 1962.
503:. The London and Southampton Railway had changed its name to the London and South Western Railway in an attempt to assuage sensitivities in Portsmouth, as there was considerable rivalry with Southampton.
729:
The line was usually only lightly used, with modest passenger numbers and low levels of freight, but the line usually saw a period of heavy use in the summer months during the strawberry harvest.
682:
The new owner made some improvements to the passenger and goods timetable, but resolutely refused to reinstate the Sunday train service. The signalling system on the line was modernised too.
645:
build its line, and it applied to the Board of Trade for a certificate of abandonment, which was granted on 28 July 1868; the company had expended ÂŁ2,337, mainly on parliamentary expenses.
478:
Competition from road transport led to dwindling passenger carryings, and the line closed to passengers in 1933. A basic goods service continued, but the line closed completely in 1962.
1173:
662:
served a demand for payment of his bond, in the amount of ÂŁ3,204. In fact at a board meeting on 6 May 1867 a total of ÂŁ11,000 in debts was listed, with no means of paying them.
569:, a dynamic local citizen, prepared a new bill for a Bishop's Waltham, Botley and Bursledon Railway (BWB&BR), intending to deposit it for the 1862 session of Parliament. At
1188:
173:
714:. Most of the main line railways were compulsorily reorganised into one or other of four new large companies, the new “Groups”. The LSWR was a component of the new
577:
branch line. Once again this raised obvious concerns within the LSWR, and running powers to Southampton from Bursledon would once again get access for the LBSCR.
804:
523:
18:
The apostrophe in the name Bishop's Waltham was always used until recent times, but now it is often omitted in official documentation and signs.
665:
The shareholders’ general meeting in August 1867 was not attended by any shareholder; evidently they all saw the company as beyond redemption.
1198:
985:
939:
780:
1193:
166:
690:
1144:
918:
879:
768:
468:
80:
495:
opened its main line throughout in 1840; it was the first long-distance railway in the area. In 1841 it opened a branch line to
265:
159:
492:
792:
518:
and Fareham. The failure to reach Portsmouth direct became a continuing source of resentment, and in 1848 a branch line to
191:
522:
was opened, meeting what became a joint line from there to Portsmouth. The joint line was operated by the LSWR and the
335:
464:
417:
455:, England. It was made by a locally promoted independent company, the Bishop's Waltham Railway company. It ran from
559:
539:
631:
arrange finance for the work delayed matters; the new buildings were not available until March or April 1865.
874:
Roger Simmonds and Kevin Robertson, The Bishop's Waltham Branch, Wild Swan Publications Ltd, Didcot, 1988,
547:
460:
400:
715:
573:, as well as making a connection to river quays there, the railway was to make a junction with the LSWR
614:
456:
500:
49:
1140:
981:
935:
914:
875:
711:
515:
543:
499:. This was intended to serve Portsmouth, by the use of a “floating bridge” (ferry) across
1160:, version 5.04, September 2022, Railway and Canal Historical Society, electronic download
618:
554:
A line from Southampton to Midhurst, joining with the Mid-Sussex Railway and beyond to
1182:
710:
In 1923 the process known as the Grouping of the Railways took place, following the
566:
1014:
A Regional History of the Railways of Great Britain: volume II: Southern England
535:
511:
507:
311:
121:
847:
It is not at all obvious what benefit the LSWR would be getting for its money.
685:
In a clear indication of priorities, the LSWR stated on 5 November 1904 that
723:
686:
641:
585:
570:
530:
disadvantage. Now the Petersfield Railway had been authorised to build from
452:
45:
152:
531:
911:
The London and South Western Railway: volume 2: Growth and Consolidation
613:
for the temporary station to be built. This was done and on 28 May 1863
1158:
Railway Passenger Stations in England, Wales and Scotland: A Chronology
555:
496:
574:
519:
584:
953:
An Historical Geography of the Railways of the British Isles
750:
Durley Halt; opened 23 December 1909; closed 1 January 1933;
747:
Bishop's Waltham; opened 1 June 1863; closed 1 January 1933;
753:
Botley; LSWR station; opened 29 November 1841; still open.
810:
Foot tunnel under the Bishop's Waltham branch, April 2011
786:
Stood on track bed looking east up Blind Lane, April 2004
565:
Local interests in Bishop's Waltham, galvanised by a Mr
932:
Directory of the Railway Companies of Great Britain
120:
112:
107:
99:
91:
86:
76:
68:
63:
55:
41:
33:
28:
23:
634:
905:
903:
901:
899:
897:
1104:
1102:
1092:
1090:
1088:
1064:
1062:
1052:
1050:
1040:
1038:
1036:
1034:
774:Wangfield Lane Bridge looking east, Sept 2007
167:
8:
1078:
1076:
1074:
1024:
1022:
1008:
1006:
996:
994:
870:
868:
866:
864:
1189:Closed railway lines in South East England
972:
970:
798:Calcot Lane Bridge looking east, Sept 2007
199:
174:
160:
913:, David and Charles, Newton Abbot, 1973,
635:Bishop's Waltham and Petersfield Railway
550:at Petersfield had been opened in 1859.
471:(LSWR). The line opened on 1 June 1863.
1016:, Phoenix House, London, 1961, page 125
860:
821:
764:
524:London Brighton and South Coast Railway
157:
829:outset, and was never a Light Railway.
20:
934:, Matador, Kibworth Beauchamp, 2017,
7:
1139:, Countryside Books, Newbury, 1988,
589:The Bishop's Waltham Railway in 1863
1135:Kevin Robertson and Leslie Oppitz,
691:Basingstoke and Alton Light Railway
358:Wangfield Lane bridge (demolished)
14:
955:, Cassell, London, 1959, page 335
546:c. clxxiii) of 23 July 1860. The
348:
278:
980:, Amberley Books, Stroud, 2010,
803:
791:
779:
767:
469:London and South Western Railway
390:
383:
376:
369:
347:
325:
299:
277:
255:
236:
235:
229:
228:
208:
81:London and South Western Railway
1174:Google Earth map showing route.
391:
370:
209:
493:London and Southampton Railway
377:
1:
1137:Hampshire Railways Remembered
1096:Simmonds, pages 13, 15 and 17
978:The Branch Lines of Hampshire
384:
326:
300:
256:
1199:Railway lines opened in 1863
540:Petersfield Railway Act 1860
1194:Rail transport in Hampshire
689:had been in service on the
626:Opening to Bishop's Waltham
514:main line, and ran through
1215:
17:
1108:Simmonds, pages 18 and 19
414:
406:
399:
363:
356:
341:
334:
319:
308:
293:
286:
271:
264:
249:
244:
222:
217:
202:
1082:Maggs, pages 130 and 131
761:Images of the line today
526:(LBSCR) co-operatively.
506:The Gosport branch left
891:Simmonds, pages 2 and 3
678:Some minor improvements
625:
449:Bishop's Waltham branch
24:Bishop's Waltham branch
649:Financial difficulties
590:
548:Portsmouth Direct line
465:Eastleigh–Fareham line
451:was a railway line in
418:Eastleigh–Fareham line
183:Bishops Waltham branch
588:
487:Predecessor railways
988:, pages 127 and 128
591:
501:Portsmouth Harbour
288:Calcot Lane bridge
245:Line to Clay pits
50:South East England
1126:Simmonds, page 79
1117:Simmonds, page 53
1068:Simmonds, page 12
1056:Simmonds, page 10
1044:Simmonds, page 11
986:978-1-84868-343-3
951:Ernest F Carter,
940:978-1-78589-353-7
712:Railways Act 1921
544:23 & 24 Vict.
445:
444:
441:
440:
151:
150:
1206:
1161:
1154:
1148:
1133:
1127:
1124:
1118:
1115:
1109:
1106:
1097:
1094:
1083:
1080:
1069:
1066:
1057:
1054:
1045:
1042:
1029:
1026:
1017:
1010:
1001:
1000:Simmonds, page 7
998:
989:
974:
965:
964:Simmonds, page 5
962:
956:
949:
943:
930:Donald J Grant,
928:
922:
921:, pages 88 to 91
907:
892:
889:
883:
872:
848:
845:
839:
836:
830:
826:
807:
795:
783:
771:
716:Southern Railway
706:Southern Railway
607:
606:
602:
599:
457:Bishop's Waltham
394:
393:
387:
386:
380:
379:
373:
372:
351:
350:
329:
328:
303:
302:
281:
280:
259:
258:
239:
238:
232:
231:
212:
211:
200:
176:
169:
162:
153:
146:
142:
140:
139:
135:
132:
21:
1214:
1213:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1179:
1178:
1170:
1165:
1164:
1155:
1151:
1134:
1130:
1125:
1121:
1116:
1112:
1107:
1100:
1095:
1086:
1081:
1072:
1067:
1060:
1055:
1048:
1043:
1032:
1028:Grant, page 374
1027:
1020:
1011:
1004:
999:
992:
976:Colin G Maggs,
975:
968:
963:
959:
950:
946:
929:
925:
908:
895:
890:
886:
873:
862:
857:
852:
851:
846:
842:
837:
833:
827:
823:
818:
811:
808:
799:
796:
787:
784:
775:
772:
763:
757:
744:
735:
708:
703:
680:
675:
651:
637:
628:
604:
600:
597:
595:
583:
489:
484:
421:
395:
388:
381:
374:
359:
352:
330:
315:
304:
289:
282:
266:Bishops Waltham
260:
240:
233:
213:
194:
185:
184:
180:
144:
137:
133:
130:
128:
127:4 ft
126:
48:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1212:
1210:
1202:
1201:
1196:
1191:
1181:
1180:
1177:
1176:
1169:
1168:External links
1166:
1163:
1162:
1149:
1128:
1119:
1110:
1098:
1084:
1070:
1058:
1046:
1030:
1018:
1002:
990:
966:
957:
944:
923:
909:R A Williams,
893:
884:
859:
858:
856:
853:
850:
849:
840:
831:
820:
819:
817:
814:
813:
812:
809:
802:
800:
797:
790:
788:
785:
778:
776:
773:
766:
762:
759:
755:
754:
751:
748:
743:
740:
734:
731:
707:
704:
702:
699:
679:
676:
674:
673:Under the LSWR
671:
650:
647:
636:
633:
627:
624:
619:Board of Trade
582:
579:
488:
485:
483:
480:
443:
442:
439:
438:
436:
434:
432:
430:
428:
426:
423:
422:
415:
413:
411:
409:
407:
404:
403:
398:
396:
389:
382:
375:
368:
366:
364:
361:
360:
357:
355:
353:
346:
344:
342:
339:
338:
333:
331:
324:
322:
320:
317:
316:
309:
307:
305:
298:
296:
294:
291:
290:
287:
285:
283:
276:
274:
272:
269:
268:
263:
261:
254:
252:
250:
247:
246:
243:
241:
234:
227:
225:
223:
220:
219:
216:
214:
207:
205:
203:
196:
195:
190:
187:
186:
182:
181:
179:
178:
171:
164:
156:
149:
148:
124:
118:
117:
114:
110:
109:
105:
104:
101:
97:
96:
93:
89:
88:
84:
83:
78:
74:
73:
70:
66:
65:
61:
60:
57:
53:
52:
43:
39:
38:
35:
31:
30:
26:
25:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1211:
1200:
1197:
1195:
1192:
1190:
1187:
1186:
1184:
1175:
1172:
1171:
1167:
1159:
1153:
1150:
1146:
1145:0-905392-93-0
1142:
1138:
1132:
1129:
1123:
1120:
1114:
1111:
1105:
1103:
1099:
1093:
1091:
1089:
1085:
1079:
1077:
1075:
1071:
1065:
1063:
1059:
1053:
1051:
1047:
1041:
1039:
1037:
1035:
1031:
1025:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1009:
1007:
1003:
997:
995:
991:
987:
983:
979:
973:
971:
967:
961:
958:
954:
948:
945:
941:
937:
933:
927:
924:
920:
919:0-7153-5940-1
916:
912:
906:
904:
902:
900:
898:
894:
888:
885:
881:
880:0-906867-67-3
877:
871:
869:
867:
865:
861:
854:
844:
841:
835:
832:
825:
822:
815:
806:
801:
794:
789:
782:
777:
770:
765:
760:
758:
752:
749:
746:
745:
741:
739:
732:
730:
727:
725:
719:
717:
713:
705:
700:
698:
694:
692:
688:
683:
677:
672:
670:
666:
663:
659:
655:
648:
646:
643:
632:
623:
620:
616:
610:
609:was ÂŁ16,000.
587:
581:Authorisation
580:
578:
576:
572:
568:
563:
561:
560:Three Bridges
557:
551:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
527:
525:
521:
517:
513:
509:
504:
502:
498:
494:
486:
481:
479:
476:
472:
470:
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
437:
435:
433:
431:
429:
427:
425:
424:
420:
419:
412:
410:
408:
405:
402:
397:
367:
365:
362:
354:
345:
343:
340:
337:
332:
323:
321:
318:
313:
310:Blind Lane /
306:
297:
295:
292:
284:
275:
273:
270:
267:
262:
253:
251:
248:
242:
226:
224:
221:
215:
206:
204:
201:
198:
197:
193:
189:
188:
177:
172:
170:
165:
163:
158:
155:
154:
145:1,435 mm
125:
123:
119:
115:
111:
106:
103:27 April 1962
102:
98:
94:
90:
85:
82:
79:
75:
71:
67:
62:
58:
54:
51:
47:
44:
40:
36:
32:
27:
22:
16:
1157:
1152:
1136:
1131:
1122:
1113:
1013:
977:
960:
952:
947:
931:
926:
910:
887:
843:
834:
824:
756:
736:
728:
720:
709:
695:
684:
681:
667:
664:
660:
656:
652:
638:
629:
615:Captain Rich
611:
592:
567:Arthur Helps
564:
552:
528:
505:
490:
477:
473:
448:
446:
416:
15:
1156:M E Quick,
1012:H P White,
536:Petersfield
512:Southampton
508:Bishopstoke
336:Durley Halt
312:Durley Mill
122:Track gauge
113:Line length
95:1 June 1863
77:Operator(s)
1183:Categories
855:References
838:Or Ritson.
701:After 1923
687:railmotors
218:Gas works
72:Heavy rail
1147:, page 27
942:, page 51
742:Locations
724:Eastleigh
642:Guildford
571:Bursledon
538:, by the
453:Hampshire
116:3.8 miles
108:Technical
46:Hampshire
882:, page 1
532:Midhurst
314:crossing
141: in
56:Stations
29:Overview
733:Closure
617:of the
603:⁄
556:Horsham
510:on the
497:Gosport
482:History
467:of the
463:on the
136:⁄
87:History
64:Service
1143:
984:
938:
917:
878:
575:Netley
520:Cosham
516:Botley
461:Botley
401:Botley
192:Legend
100:Closed
92:Opened
42:Locale
37:Closed
34:Status
816:Notes
1141:ISBN
982:ISBN
936:ISBN
915:ISBN
876:ISBN
558:and
491:The
447:The
69:Type
534:to
459:to
1185::
1101:^
1087:^
1073:^
1061:^
1049:^
1033:^
1021:^
1005:^
993:^
969:^
896:^
863:^
718:.
605:2
601:1
598:+
596:3
542:(
175:e
168:t
161:v
147:)
143:(
138:2
134:1
131:+
129:8
59:3
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.