Knowledge

Brand preference

Source 📝

31:
recommended by another. This is not an exhaustive list. More complicated factors can include emotional sentimentality (for example, positive nostalgic memories); affiliation with a product's source of origin, and other socioeconomic or political considerations. There is no reason any of the aforementioned must stand alone and combinations thereof are common.
30:
In layman's terms, brand preference relates to the psychological phenomenon where people have 'a favourite brand.' This can be driven by factors including a preference for the taste of the product or other sensory qualities; because the packaging may be appealing, or because the product was
78:
is a brand choice methodology applied at various stages of the marketing process. It is derived by comparing the percent choosing a particular brand versus competing brands before and after marketing activity
43:
activities in the hearts and minds of customers and potential customers. Higher brand preference usually indicates more revenues (sales) and profit, also making it an indicator of company financial performance.
96: 217:
Blair, Margaret Henderson, and Michael J. Rabuck. "Advertising Wearin and Wearout: Ten Years Later. More Empirical Evidence and Successful Practice."
308: 100: 269:
Adams, Anthony J., and Margaret Henderson Blair. "Persuasive Advertising and Sales Accountability: Past Experience and Forward Validation."
191:
Masterson, Peggy. "The Wearout Phenomenon: Advertising's Selling Power Declines Predictably, Based on the Underused 'Wearout' Finding."
325: 286: 103:. A MMAP audit examines the 10 characteristics of an "ideal metric," including reliability, calibration, predictive validity, etc. 380: 375: 390: 385: 302: 355: 56: 27:
represents which brands are preferred under assumptions of equality in price and availability.
95:
are the results of the methodology applied to TV ads. It has been audited and profiled by the
370: 312: 288:
Practices & Processes Underlying the Development & Management of an “Ideal Metric”
52:
There are at least three classes of methodologies to measure brand preference directly:
89:
applies the methodology to a selling proposition before moving on to creative execution.
364: 128:
Blair, Margaret H., and Allan R. Kuse. "Better Practices in Advertising Can Change a
149:
Shepard, Barry. "Developing and Managing Advertising for StarKist Tuna in a Pouch."
62:
Brand choice measures (choice of preferred brand from a competitive set of brands)
230:
Jones, John Philip. "Advertising Pretesting; Will Europe Follow America's Lead?"
165:
Shirley, Dan. "From Copy Testing and Diagnostics to Process-driven Improvement."
65:
Constant sum measures (planned purchases amongst a competitive set of brands)
204:
Ashley, Susan R. "How to Effectively Compete Against Private-Label Brands."
40: 178:
Stewart, David W. "Advertising Wearout: What and How You Measure Matters."
340: 327:
Measuring and Improving the Return from TV Advertising (An Example).
20: 39:
Measures of brand preference attempt to quantify the impact of
256:
Mondello, Mike. "Turning Research Into Return-on-Investment."
245:
Dartnell's Advertising Manager's Handbook: 4th Edition.
109:
tracks the impact of all marketing activity over time.
281: 279: 97:Marketing Accountability Standards Board (MASB) 8: 59:questions (self-report, unaided preference) 19:One of the indicators of the strength of a 304:comScore Announces Acquisition of ARSgroup 243:Adams, Anthony. "Advertising Research" in 161: 159: 121: 101:MMAP (Marketing Metric Audit Protocol) 23:in the hearts and minds of customers, 7: 151:Quirk's Marketing Research Review. 14: 271:Journal of Advertising Research. 258:Journal of Advertising Research. 219:Journal of Advertising Research. 206:Journal of Advertising Research. 180:Journal of Advertising Research. 138:Journal of Advertising Research. 134:Wise Investments in the Business 107:Brand Preference Monitor (BPM) 1: 407: 232:Commercial Communications. 311:9 February 2011 at the 247:Ed. David Bushko, 1997. 221:September/October 1998. 182:September/October 1999. 208:January/February 1998. 169:(ANA). April/May 1999. 130:Cost of Doing Business 356:MASB Official Website 381:Communication design 376:Branding terminology 301:comScore ARSgroup. 193:Marketing Research. 16:Consumer psychology 391:Product management 315:10 February 2010. 273:March/April 1992. 260:July/August 1996. 398: 343: 337: 331: 322: 316: 299: 293: 283: 274: 267: 261: 254: 248: 241: 235: 228: 222: 215: 209: 202: 196: 189: 183: 176: 170: 163: 154: 147: 141: 126: 25:brand preference 406: 405: 401: 400: 399: 397: 396: 395: 361: 360: 352: 347: 346: 338: 334: 323: 319: 313:Wayback Machine 300: 296: 284: 277: 268: 264: 255: 251: 242: 238: 229: 225: 216: 212: 203: 199: 190: 186: 177: 173: 164: 157: 148: 144: 127: 123: 118: 72: 50: 37: 17: 12: 11: 5: 404: 402: 394: 393: 388: 386:Graphic design 383: 378: 373: 363: 362: 359: 358: 351: 350:External links 348: 345: 344: 332: 317: 294: 292:October 2010. 275: 262: 249: 236: 223: 210: 197: 184: 171: 167:The Advertiser 155: 142: 120: 119: 117: 114: 113: 112: 111: 110: 104: 90: 81: 80: 76:ARS Persuasion 71: 68: 67: 66: 63: 60: 49: 46: 36: 33: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 403: 392: 389: 387: 384: 382: 379: 377: 374: 372: 369: 368: 366: 357: 354: 353: 349: 342: 336: 333: 329: 328: 321: 318: 314: 310: 307: 305: 298: 295: 291: 289: 282: 280: 276: 272: 266: 263: 259: 253: 250: 246: 240: 237: 233: 227: 224: 220: 214: 211: 207: 201: 198: 194: 188: 185: 181: 175: 172: 168: 162: 160: 156: 152: 146: 143: 139: 135: 131: 125: 122: 115: 108: 105: 102: 99:according to 98: 94: 91: 88: 85: 84: 83: 82: 77: 74: 73: 70:Methodologies 69: 64: 61: 58: 55: 54: 53: 47: 45: 42: 34: 32: 28: 26: 22: 335: 330:April 2008. 326: 320: 303: 297: 287: 270: 265: 257: 252: 244: 239: 231: 226: 218: 213: 205: 200: 192: 187: 179: 174: 166: 150: 145: 137: 133: 129: 124: 106: 92: 86: 75: 51: 48:Construction 38: 29: 24: 18: 153:March 2003. 140:March 2004. 365:Categories 234:June 1997. 195:Fall 1999. 116:References 93:APM Facts 41:marketing 309:Archived 87:Firstep 35:Purpose 371:Brands 339:MASB. 324:MASB. 285:MASB. 57:Survey 341:MMAP. 21:brand 136:." 132:to 367:: 278:^ 158:^ 306:. 290:. 79:.

Index

brand
marketing
Survey
Marketing Accountability Standards Board (MASB)
MMAP (Marketing Metric Audit Protocol)




Practices & Processes Underlying the Development & Management of an “Ideal Metric”.
comScore Announces Acquisition of ARSgroup.
Archived
Wayback Machine
Measuring and Improving the Return from TV Advertising (An Example).
MMAP.
MASB Official Website
Categories
Brands
Branding terminology
Communication design
Graphic design
Product management

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.