Knowledge

British Columbia Basic Income Expert Panel Report

Source 📝

110:. It determined that a pilot would not be useful, chiefly because pilots are, by their nature, temporary and cannot provide evidence on long-term impacts. Young people maturing into adulthood under a permanent program might choose different lifetime paths in education, occupation, and work compared to what they would choose in a pilot program. Also, people in a pilot might respond differently when they alone receive the benefit, compared to if everyone is eligible. 98: Due to the additional costs faced by those with disabilities, the panel believed some targeted cash and in-kind benefits would still be required.  As well, temporary assistance would need to be retained in some form. This is because, to the extent that people build a basic income into their regular budget, emergency assistance may be needed for those facing an unexpected shortfall in income. 37:. The expert panel members appointed to prepare the report were David Green, Professor at the University of British Columbia (Chair), Jonathan Rhys Kesselman, Professor Emeritus at the School of Public Policy at Simon Fraser University and Lindsay Tedds, Associate Professor at the University of Calgary. Daniel Perrin, Principal at Perrin, Thorau and Associates Ltd. was Lead Co-Author & Writer. 69:
sustainable.” The second aspect of public trust is reciprocity, which means institutions must be seen as just by all involved “including those who are more likely to pay into the system than draw benefits from it.”  Public trust requires consideration of fiscal implications and economic incentives and impacts.
60:
The expert panel's report concluded that a system constructed around “a basic income for all” as its main pillar “is not the most just policy option. The needs of people in this society are too diverse to be effectively answered simply with a cheque from the government.” Instead, it proposes a mixed
89:
The simulations showed that a basic income is a very costly approach to address poverty reduction. As one example, to obtain a guaranteed income at $ 20,000 for a single person, a universal basic income (UBI) would cost $ 51 billion and approximately double provincial government spending. This UBI
44:
residents through a web-based public engagement process and over 450 submissions were received from individuals and community organizations. In-person consultations were held with stakeholders in May 2019, and the report incorporates findings from an online survey in 2020 that was conducted using a
113:
Further, a basic income needs to be considered in the context of how it is financed and how other policy changes interact with it. With a pilot it is not feasible to test the major taxation changes needed to finance a real-world basic income, which the panel's analysis suggests might have impacts
64:
Two major differences between the basic income philosophy and the panel's “broader social justice-based framework” were identified.  The first is that “basic income principles place considerable weight on the individual’s freedom of choice inherent in cash support.”  The panel noted that
68:
The second difference is the panel's emphasis on two elements of public trust: policy stability and reciprocity.  By policy stability, the panel means “the policies have sufficiently broad support that they will not simply be undone in the next political cycle and that they are economically
97:
In the panel's view, there is little scope to fund basic income by eliminating existing social support programs in B.C.  For example, it would not be appropriate to eliminate social support programs that target children, as these would not be replaced by a basic income that goes to adults.
93:
Also, financing a basic income through personal income taxes would add a material amount to the marginal effective tax rate (which affects the decision to work one more hour) and the participation tax rate (which affects the decision to work or not). Increases in these rates would create
137:
argues "Poverty levels in B.C. will not come down as a result of any of report's recommendations." Evelyn Forget, a professor at the University of Manitoba who has studied basic income said “ ‘I don’t disagree with any changes they recommend. I just don’t think they go far enough.’ ”
85:
was employed to run 1640 simulations. These simulations were used to compare different types of basic income programs (including a universal basic income (UBI) and a refundable tax credit) by varying design parameters such as the maximum amount of the benefit.
61:
system that applies different approaches in different circumstances, such as targeted support for specific groups like youth aging out of care and women fleeing violence. The panel made 65 recommendations to improve the existing income support system.
369: 94:
disincentive effects for all taxpayers. Tax hikes would also increase incentives to avoid or evade taxes, so are unlikely to raise an amount of revenue proportional to the increase in tax rates.
65:“While autonomy is an important component of our framework, we believe that true autonomy is only possible when basic needs like health care, education, and housing have been addressed.” 53:
A basic income is defined in the report as a policy that guarantees all members of a society a minimum amount of income. One type of basic income considered is the most well-known: a
302: 346: 40:
The report is based on over 40 research studies commissioned by the panel and written by “some of the best public policy economists in Canada.” The panel consulted with
407: 280: 57:(UBI). With a UBI, everyone receives a cash transfer at regular intervals, with no conditions, and no eligibility requirements except residency in the jurisdiction. 361: 193: 388: 426: 149:
said the report “is likely one of the most exhaustive examinations on the viability of a guaranteed income conducted anywhere in the world.”
295: 33:
The BC Green Party made a study of basic income a requirement before it would support the NDP's minority government, as stated in the
338: 251: 141:
William Watson applauds the “plainspokenness” of the study, and the expert panel's rigorous evaluation of a basic income program.
23: 431: 323: 173: 403: 252:"Covering All the Basics: Reforms for a More Just Society, Final Report of the British Columbia Expert Panel on Basic Income" 26:
was released on 28 January 2021. It provides a comprehensive assessment of data on low-income earners and income supports in
272: 90:
is “orders of magnitude” more expensive than income-tested support programs that provide similar poverty reduction.
163: 384: 146: 54: 168: 107: 35:
2017 Confidence and Supply Agreement between the BC Green Caucus and the BC New Democrat Caucus
78: 339:"Guaranteed basic income in B.C. not the best way to a more just society, expert panel finds" 82: 41: 27: 127: 123: 126:, said the government was reviewing the report's recommendations. BC Green Party Leader 319: 250:
Green, David; Kesselman, Jonathan; Tedds, Lindsay; Perrin, Daniel (28 December 2020).
30:(BC) and Canada, and a summary of state-of-the-art research on basic income programs. 420: 158: 194:"Basic Income or Welfare Reform? A summary of the BC Basic Income Panel Report" 134: 130:
recommended that the government act swiftly on the report's recommendations.
362:"A voice against burying the idea of a basic income for Canadians" 20: 122:
The BC Minister of Social Development and Poverty Reduction,
106:
As part of its mandate, the panel was asked to consider a
24:“Covering All the Basics: Reforms for a More Just Society” 114:even more salient than those on the benefit side. 45:sample of approximately 2000 British Columbians. 320:"Minister's statement on basic income report" 21:British Columbia Expert Panel on Basic Income 8: 404:"The case against a guaranteed basic income" 294:BC Basic Income Expert Panel (28 Dec 2020). 245: 243: 241: 239: 237: 235: 233: 231: 229: 227: 225: 223: 385:"BC Panel Rejects a Universal Basic Income" 273:"Basic Income report: One size fits no one" 221: 219: 217: 215: 213: 211: 209: 207: 205: 203: 83:Social Policy Simulation Database and Model 16:2021 Assessment of income support programs 266: 264: 77:To estimate the cost of a basic income, 184: 7: 14: 427:Universal basic income in Canada 410:from the original on 2021-02-10. 391:from the original on 2021-01-29. 372:from the original on 2021-02-19. 360:Segal, Hugh (19 February 2021). 349:from the original on 2021-01-28. 326:from the original on 2021-01-28. 308:from the original on 2021-01-28. 283:from the original on 2021-02-04. 192:Smart, Michael (29 March 2021). 174:Universal basic income in Canada 271:Watson, William (4 Feb 2021). 1: 337:Larsen, Karen (28 Jan 2021). 383:Wyton, Moira (28 Jan 2021). 133:Former Conservative senator 402:Mason, Gary (10 Feb 2021). 448: 196:. Finances of the Nation. 164:Guaranteed minimum income 73:Financing a basic income 432:Government aid programs 118:Responses to the report 55:universal basic income 102:A basic income pilot 296:"Executive Summary" 169:Negative income tax 108:basic income pilot 19:The report of the 79:Statistics Canada 439: 412: 411: 399: 393: 392: 380: 374: 373: 357: 351: 350: 334: 328: 327: 316: 310: 309: 307: 300: 291: 285: 284: 268: 259: 258: 256: 247: 198: 197: 189: 42:British Columbia 28:British Columbia 447: 446: 442: 441: 440: 438: 437: 436: 417: 416: 415: 401: 400: 396: 382: 381: 377: 359: 358: 354: 336: 335: 331: 322:. 28 Jan 2021. 318: 317: 313: 305: 298: 293: 292: 288: 270: 269: 262: 254: 249: 248: 201: 191: 190: 186: 182: 155: 128:Sonia Furstenau 124:Nicholas Simons 120: 104: 75: 51: 17: 12: 11: 5: 445: 443: 435: 434: 429: 419: 418: 414: 413: 394: 375: 352: 329: 311: 286: 277:Financial Post 260: 199: 183: 181: 178: 177: 176: 171: 166: 161: 154: 151: 143:Globe and Mail 119: 116: 103: 100: 74: 71: 50: 47: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 444: 433: 430: 428: 425: 424: 422: 409: 405: 398: 395: 390: 386: 379: 376: 371: 367: 363: 356: 353: 348: 344: 340: 333: 330: 325: 321: 315: 312: 304: 297: 290: 287: 282: 278: 274: 267: 265: 261: 253: 246: 244: 242: 240: 238: 236: 234: 232: 230: 228: 226: 224: 222: 220: 218: 216: 214: 212: 210: 208: 206: 204: 200: 195: 188: 185: 179: 175: 172: 170: 167: 165: 162: 160: 157: 156: 152: 150: 148: 144: 139: 136: 131: 129: 125: 117: 115: 111: 109: 101: 99: 95: 91: 87: 84: 80: 72: 70: 66: 62: 58: 56: 48: 46: 43: 38: 36: 31: 29: 25: 22: 397: 378: 365: 355: 342: 332: 314: 289: 276: 187: 159:Basic income 142: 140: 132: 121: 112: 105: 96: 92: 88: 76: 67: 63: 59: 52: 39: 34: 32: 18: 421:Categories 180:References 147:Gary Mason 145:columnist 135:Hugh Segal 408:Archived 389:Archived 370:Archived 366:The Star 347:Archived 343:CBC News 324:Archived 303:Archived 281:Archived 153:See also 49:Findings 306:(PDF) 299:(PDF) 255:(PDF) 81:'s 423:: 406:. 387:. 368:. 364:. 345:. 341:. 301:. 279:. 275:. 263:^ 202:^ 257:.

Index

British Columbia Expert Panel on Basic Income
“Covering All the Basics: Reforms for a More Just Society”
British Columbia
British Columbia
universal basic income
Statistics Canada
Social Policy Simulation Database and Model
basic income pilot
Nicholas Simons
Sonia Furstenau
Hugh Segal
Gary Mason
Basic income
Guaranteed minimum income
Negative income tax
Universal basic income in Canada
"Basic Income or Welfare Reform? A summary of the BC Basic Income Panel Report"












Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑