123:
24:
310:
suit filed by the employee's former secretary, with whom he allegedly had an affair, the employer fired the employee. The court held that it was appropriate to create a public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctrine, as the termination had clearly violated a well-defined public policy, as
144:
Charles J. Brockmeyer, Plaintiff-Respondent and Cross-Appellant-Petitioner, v. Dun & Bradstreet, a foreign corporation with registered agent being C.T. Corporation System, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Respondent.
454:
34:
92:
439:
64:
340:
71:
444:
78:
60:
49:
449:
361:
459:
182:
85:
386:
283:
133:
122:
41:
404:
214:
362:
Brockmeyer v. Dun & Bradstreet: The Narrow Public Policy
Exception to the Terminable-At-Will Rule
319:
or constitutional provision. As the employee failed to prove that his discharge violated fundamental
303:
299:
222:
206:
395:
307:
287:
262:
218:
202:
413:
186:
433:
422:
320:
226:
210:
23:
279:
331:
The court affirmed the decision of the lower court in favor of the employer.
311:
evidenced by existing law. While the employer's actions may have constituted
312:
316:
302:
as a district manager of credit services, though he lacked a formal
286:
first identified that
Wisconsin has some judicial exceptions to the
365:, 38 University of Miami Law Review 565 (May 1, 1984).
17:
45:
298:
Charles J. Brockmeyer was employed at investment firm
278:113 Wis. 2d 561, 335 N.W.2d 834 (Wis. 1983), was a
253:
245:
237:
232:
198:
193:
178:
173:
165:
150:
139:
129:
115:
323:, the decision for the employer was appropriate.
315:, they did not contravene the policies of any
8:
50:introducing citations to additional sources
121:
112:
40:Relevant discussion may be found on the
351:
7:
61:"Brockmeyer v. Dun & Bradstreet"
380:Brockmeyer v. Dun & Bradstreet
275:Brockmeyer v. Dun & Bradstreet
116:Brockmeyer v. Dun & Bradstreet
14:
341:Bammert v. Don's Super Valu, Inc.
33:relies largely or entirely on a
22:
306:. After the employer settled a
455:1983 in United States case law
169:113 Wis.2d 561; 335 N.W.2d 834
1:
440:United States labor case law
476:
183:Wisconsin Court of Appeals
258:
120:
445:Wisconsin state case law
360:
284:Wisconsin Supreme Court
134:Wisconsin Supreme Court
154:July 1, 1983
339:The case is cited in
215:Shirley S. Abrahamson
450:Dun & Bradstreet
300:Dun & Bradstreet
46:improve this article
304:employment contract
223:Donald W. Steinmetz
207:Nathan S. Heffernan
187:109 Wis.2d 44, 1982
382:is available from:
308:sex discrimination
288:employment at will
263:At-will employment
460:1983 in Wisconsin
271:
270:
249:Day, Callow, Ceci
219:William G. Callow
203:Bruce F. Beilfuss
111:
110:
96:
467:
427:
421:
418:
412:
409:
403:
400:
394:
391:
385:
367:
366:
364:
356:
194:Court membership
161:
159:
125:
113:
106:
103:
97:
95:
54:
26:
18:
475:
474:
470:
469:
468:
466:
465:
464:
430:
429:
425:
419:
416:
410:
407:
401:
398:
392:
389:
383:
376:
371:
370:
358:
357:
353:
348:
337:
329:
296:
267:
157:
155:
107:
101:
98:
55:
53:
39:
27:
12:
11:
5:
473:
471:
463:
462:
457:
452:
447:
442:
432:
431:
396:Google Scholar
375:
374:External links
372:
369:
368:
350:
349:
347:
344:
336:
333:
328:
325:
295:
292:
269:
268:
266:
265:
259:
256:
255:
251:
250:
247:
246:Concur/dissent
243:
242:
239:
235:
234:
230:
229:
200:
199:Judges sitting
196:
195:
191:
190:
180:
176:
175:
171:
170:
167:
163:
162:
152:
148:
147:
141:
140:Full case name
137:
136:
131:
127:
126:
118:
117:
109:
108:
44:. Please help
30:
28:
21:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
472:
461:
458:
456:
453:
451:
448:
446:
443:
441:
438:
437:
435:
428:
424:
415:
406:
397:
388:
387:CourtListener
381:
373:
363:
355:
352:
345:
343:
342:
334:
332:
326:
324:
322:
321:public policy
318:
314:
309:
305:
301:
293:
291:
289:
285:
282:in which the
281:
277:
276:
264:
261:
260:
257:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
233:Case opinions
231:
228:
227:Louis J. Ceci
224:
220:
216:
212:
211:Roland B. Day
208:
204:
201:
197:
192:
188:
184:
181:
179:Appealed from
177:
172:
168:
164:
153:
149:
146:
142:
138:
135:
132:
128:
124:
119:
114:
105:
94:
91:
87:
84:
80:
77:
73:
70:
66:
63: –
62:
58:
57:Find sources:
51:
47:
43:
37:
36:
35:single source
31:This article
29:
25:
20:
19:
16:
379:
377:
359:Amy Ronner,
354:
338:
330:
297:
274:
273:
272:
174:Case history
143:
99:
89:
82:
75:
68:
56:
32:
15:
238:Decision by
434:Categories
346:References
290:doctrine.
158:1983-07-01
102:April 2022
72:newspapers
335:Citations
313:bad faith
241:Steinmetz
42:talk page
378:Text of
254:Keywords
166:Citation
327:Holding
317:statute
156: (
151:Decided
86:scholar
426:
420:
417:
414:Leagle
411:
408:
405:Justia
402:
399:
393:
390:
384:
88:
81:
74:
67:
59:
294:Facts
130:Court
93:JSTOR
79:books
423:vLex
280:case
65:news
48:by
436::
225:,
221:,
217:,
213:,
209:,
205:,
189:)
185:(
160:)
104:)
100:(
90:·
83:·
76:·
69:·
52:.
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
