31:
285:
with its contracts with its customers. In the subsequent jury trial, BFI was found liable on both claims. In a separate one-day trial on the damages, the jury settled on compensatory damages of $ 51,146, and punitive damages of $ 6 million. The trial court then awarded Kelco
265:
market since it entered the roll-off market in 1976. Joseph Kelley was a district manager for BFI until 1980, when he left to found his own company, Kelco
Disposal. By 1982, Kelco had garnered over 40% of the roll-off market; in that year, BFI began a campaign of
301:. The Second Circuit affirmed the trial court's decision on both liability and damages, finding for the sake of argument that the jury's punitive-damage award was not excessive whether or not the Eighth Amendment applied to this case. The Supreme Court granted
1290:
331:
274:
446:
316:
294:
107:
82:
326:
523:
298:
290:
and attorney's fees on the anti-trust claim, but awarded $ 6,066,082.74 on the alternative state tort claim, so further action proceeded on the basis of the higher award.
239:
120:
270:, which continued for several months, with the intent of driving Kelco out of the business. In 1985, BFI sold their Burlington operations to another company.
1285:
321:
1295:
514:
1300:
669:
235:
35:
307:
to consider the specific question of whether the excessive fines clause applies to civil cases involving purely private parties.
1149:
507:
1238:
364:
Ghiardi, James D. (1990). "Punitive
Damages: State Extraction Practice Is Subject to Eighth Amendment Limitations".
254:
1101:
773:
1254:
1201:
765:
1230:
626:
500:
475:
1213:
1077:
677:
562:
554:
178:
146:
63:
1184:
981:
925:
805:
450:
282:
278:
74:
941:
837:
829:
813:
797:
642:
586:
457:
1042:
997:
733:
634:
594:
262:
258:
1109:
1034:
989:
861:
853:
781:
757:
725:
693:
602:
303:
1125:
1117:
1093:
1018:
909:
877:
845:
741:
685:
661:
618:
610:
570:
423:
398:
373:
267:
170:
158:
138:
1246:
1141:
1026:
965:
957:
885:
821:
789:
749:
709:
701:
243:
1085:
949:
917:
901:
893:
869:
717:
492:
190:
1193:
1133:
1069:
1050:
973:
466:
287:
182:
166:
1279:
578:
933:
77:
154:
54:
Browning-Ferris
Industries of Vt., Inc., el al. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc., et al.
427:
402:
377:
281:. Kelco also claimed, as an alternative state-law cause of action, that BFI
89:
484:
207:
Blackmun, joined by
Rehnquist, Brennan, White, Marshall, Scalia, Kennedy
123:'s prohibition on excessive fines when the United States is not a party.
385:
Petrie, D. B. (1990). "The
Punitive Damages and the Constitution after
1223:
Browning-Ferris
Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.
443:
Browning-Ferris
Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.
119:
Awards of punitive damages in civil cases are not subject to the
410:
Sneiderman, S. H. (1990). "The Future of
Punitive Damages after
332:
List of United States
Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist Court
1172:
535:
496:
30:
246:
awards in civil cases when the United States is not a party.
1291:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
275:
United States District Court for the District of Vermont
242:'s prohibition of unreasonable fines does not apply to
317:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 492
108:
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
327:
Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume
1212:
1183:
1061:
1008:
653:
546:
219:
211:
203:
198:
127:
113:
102:
97:
69:
59:
49:
42:
23:
234:, 492 U.S. 257 (1989), was a case in which the
508:
8:
412:Browning-Ferris Industries v. Kelco Disposal
387:Browning-Ferris Industries v. Kelco Disposal
231:Browning-Ferris Industries v. Kelco Disposal
24:Browning-Ferris Industries v. Kelco Disposal
1180:
1169:
543:
532:
515:
501:
493:
350:Opinion of the court, 492 U.S. 257, 260ff.
20:
322:List of United States Supreme Court cases
257:(BFI) had been the dominant provider of
343:
670:Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber
18:1989 United States Supreme Court case
7:
277:alleging that BFI had violated the
236:Supreme Court of the United States
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
1286:United States Supreme Court cases
453:257 (1989) is available from:
293:BFI appealed the judgment to the
273:In 1984, Kelco filed suit in the
261:trash collection services in the
366:Tort & Insurance Law Journal
29:
1296:Excessive Fines Clause case law
295:Second Circuit Court of Appeals
1301:1989 in United States case law
1150:City of Grants Pass v. Johnson
524:United States Eighth Amendment
297:, and raised the issue of the
1:
537:Cruel and unusual punishment
1239:United States v. Bajakajian
223:O'Connor, joined by Stevens
215:Brennan, joined by Marshall
1317:
485:Oyez (oral argument audio)
255:Browning-Ferris Industries
1179:
1168:
1102:South Carolina v. Gathers
774:Skipper v. South Carolina
542:
531:
391:Arizona State Law Journal
132:
118:
28:
1255:Tyler v. Hennepin County
1202:United States v. Salerno
1174:Excessive bail and fines
1231:Austin v. United States
766:Caldwell v. Mississippi
627:Montgomery v. Louisiana
1214:Excessive Fines Clause
1078:Robinson v. California
694:California v. Anderson
678:McGautha v. California
563:Robinson v. California
555:Weems v. United States
416:Ohio State Law Journal
299:excessive fines clause
147:William J. Brennan Jr.
1185:Excessive Bail Clause
926:Panetti v. Quarterman
806:Maynard v. Cartwright
279:Sherman Antitrust Act
88:109 S. Ct. 2909; 106
45:Decided June 26, 1989
43:Argued April 18, 1989
942:Kennedy v. Louisiana
838:Whitmore v. Arkansas
830:Stanford v. Kentucky
814:Thompson v. Oklahoma
798:Lowenfield v. Phelps
643:Jones v. Mississippi
587:Harmelin v. Michigan
1118:Helling v. McKinney
1043:Hudson v. McMillian
1009:Corporal punishment
998:Bucklew v. Precythe
734:Spaziano v. Florida
635:Virginia v. LeBlanc
595:Ewing v. California
476:Library of Congress
263:Burlington, Vermont
179:Sandra Day O'Connor
1110:Payne v. Tennessee
1035:Ingraham v. Wright
990:Madison v. Alabama
862:Atkins v. Virginia
854:Herrera v. Collins
782:Ford v. Wainwright
758:Glass v. Louisiana
726:Godfrey v. Georgia
603:Lockyer v. Andrade
143:Associate Justices
1273:
1272:
1269:
1268:
1265:
1264:
1164:
1163:
1160:
1159:
1126:Farmer v. Brennan
1094:Estelle v. Gamble
1019:Jackson v. Bishop
910:Hill v. McDonough
878:Tennard v. Dretke
846:Walton v. Arizona
742:Enmund v. Florida
686:Furman v. Georgia
662:Wilkerson v. Utah
619:Miller v. Alabama
611:Graham v. Florida
571:Rummel v. Estelle
268:predatory pricing
227:
226:
159:Thurgood Marshall
139:William Rehnquist
1308:
1247:Timbs v. Indiana
1181:
1170:
1142:Kahler v. Kansas
1027:Gates v. Collier
966:Hurst v. Florida
958:Glossip v. Gross
886:Roper v. Simmons
822:Penry v. Lynaugh
790:Tison v. Arizona
750:Pulley v. Harris
710:Coker v. Georgia
702:Gregg v. Georgia
544:
533:
517:
510:
503:
494:
489:
483:
480:
474:
471:
465:
462:
456:
431:
406:
381:
351:
348:
240:Eighth Amendment
128:Court membership
121:Eighth Amendment
106:Appeal from the
33:
32:
21:
1316:
1315:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1261:
1208:
1175:
1156:
1086:Powell v. Texas
1057:
1030:(5th Cir. 1974)
1022:(8th Cir. 1968)
1010:
1004:
950:Hall v. Florida
918:Kansas v. Marsh
902:Oregon v. Guzek
897:(5th Cir. 2005)
894:Bigby v. Dretke
870:Ring v. Arizona
718:Lockett v. Ohio
649:
538:
527:
521:
487:
481:
478:
472:
469:
463:
460:
454:
438:
409:
384:
363:
360:
358:Further reading
355:
354:
349:
345:
340:
313:
252:
244:punitive-damage
191:Anthony Kennedy
181:
171:John P. Stevens
169:
157:
93:
44:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1314:
1312:
1304:
1303:
1298:
1293:
1288:
1278:
1277:
1271:
1270:
1267:
1266:
1263:
1262:
1260:
1259:
1251:
1243:
1235:
1227:
1218:
1216:
1210:
1209:
1207:
1206:
1198:
1194:Stack v. Boyle
1189:
1187:
1177:
1176:
1173:
1166:
1165:
1162:
1161:
1158:
1157:
1155:
1154:
1146:
1138:
1134:Brown v. Plata
1130:
1122:
1114:
1106:
1098:
1090:
1082:
1074:
1070:Trop v. Dulles
1065:
1063:
1059:
1058:
1056:
1055:
1051:Hope v. Pelzer
1047:
1039:
1031:
1023:
1014:
1012:
1006:
1005:
1003:
1002:
994:
986:
982:Moore v. Texas
978:
974:Kansas v. Carr
970:
962:
954:
946:
938:
930:
922:
914:
906:
898:
890:
882:
874:
866:
858:
850:
842:
834:
826:
818:
810:
802:
794:
786:
778:
770:
762:
754:
746:
738:
730:
722:
714:
706:
698:
690:
682:
674:
666:
657:
655:
651:
650:
648:
647:
639:
631:
623:
615:
607:
599:
591:
583:
575:
567:
559:
550:
548:
540:
539:
536:
529:
528:
522:
520:
519:
512:
505:
497:
491:
490:
458:Google Scholar
437:
436:External links
434:
433:
432:
407:
382:
359:
356:
353:
352:
342:
341:
339:
336:
335:
334:
329:
324:
319:
312:
309:
288:treble damages
251:
248:
238:held that the
225:
224:
221:
220:Concur/dissent
217:
216:
213:
209:
208:
205:
201:
200:
196:
195:
194:
193:
183:Antonin Scalia
167:Harry Blackmun
144:
141:
136:
130:
129:
125:
124:
116:
115:
111:
110:
104:
100:
99:
95:
94:
87:
71:
67:
66:
61:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1313:
1302:
1299:
1297:
1294:
1292:
1289:
1287:
1284:
1283:
1281:
1257:
1256:
1252:
1249:
1248:
1244:
1241:
1240:
1236:
1233:
1232:
1228:
1225:
1224:
1220:
1219:
1217:
1215:
1211:
1204:
1203:
1199:
1196:
1195:
1191:
1190:
1188:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1171:
1167:
1152:
1151:
1147:
1144:
1143:
1139:
1136:
1135:
1131:
1128:
1127:
1123:
1120:
1119:
1115:
1112:
1111:
1107:
1104:
1103:
1099:
1096:
1095:
1091:
1088:
1087:
1083:
1080:
1079:
1075:
1072:
1071:
1067:
1066:
1064:
1060:
1053:
1052:
1048:
1045:
1044:
1040:
1037:
1036:
1032:
1029:
1028:
1024:
1021:
1020:
1016:
1015:
1013:
1007:
1000:
999:
995:
992:
991:
987:
984:
983:
979:
976:
975:
971:
968:
967:
963:
960:
959:
955:
952:
951:
947:
944:
943:
939:
936:
935:
931:
928:
927:
923:
920:
919:
915:
912:
911:
907:
904:
903:
899:
896:
895:
891:
888:
887:
883:
880:
879:
875:
872:
871:
867:
864:
863:
859:
856:
855:
851:
848:
847:
843:
840:
839:
835:
832:
831:
827:
824:
823:
819:
816:
815:
811:
808:
807:
803:
800:
799:
795:
792:
791:
787:
784:
783:
779:
776:
775:
771:
768:
767:
763:
760:
759:
755:
752:
751:
747:
744:
743:
739:
736:
735:
731:
728:
727:
723:
720:
719:
715:
712:
711:
707:
704:
703:
699:
696:
695:
691:
688:
687:
683:
680:
679:
675:
672:
671:
667:
664:
663:
659:
658:
656:
654:Death penalty
652:
645:
644:
640:
637:
636:
632:
629:
628:
624:
621:
620:
616:
613:
612:
608:
605:
604:
600:
597:
596:
592:
589:
588:
584:
581:
580:
579:Solem v. Helm
576:
573:
572:
568:
565:
564:
560:
557:
556:
552:
551:
549:
547:Incarceration
545:
541:
534:
530:
525:
518:
513:
511:
506:
504:
499:
498:
495:
486:
477:
468:
459:
452:
448:
444:
440:
439:
435:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
383:
379:
375:
371:
367:
362:
361:
357:
347:
344:
337:
333:
330:
328:
325:
323:
320:
318:
315:
314:
310:
308:
306:
305:
300:
296:
291:
289:
284:
280:
276:
271:
269:
264:
260:
256:
250:Prior history
249:
247:
245:
241:
237:
233:
232:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
199:Case opinions
197:
192:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
152:
148:
145:
142:
140:
137:
135:Chief Justice
134:
133:
131:
126:
122:
117:
112:
109:
105:
101:
96:
91:
85:
84:
79:
76:
72:
68:
65:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
1253:
1245:
1237:
1229:
1222:
1221:
1200:
1192:
1148:
1140:
1132:
1124:
1116:
1108:
1100:
1092:
1084:
1076:
1068:
1049:
1041:
1033:
1025:
1017:
996:
988:
980:
972:
964:
956:
948:
940:
934:Baze v. Rees
932:
924:
916:
908:
900:
892:
884:
876:
868:
860:
852:
844:
836:
828:
820:
812:
804:
796:
788:
780:
772:
764:
756:
748:
740:
737:(1981, 1984)
732:
724:
716:
708:
700:
692:
684:
676:
668:
660:
641:
633:
625:
617:
609:
601:
593:
585:
577:
569:
561:
553:
442:
419:
415:
411:
394:
390:
386:
369:
365:
346:
302:
292:
272:
253:
230:
229:
228:
186:
174:
162:
150:
98:Case history
81:
53:
15:
1011:or injuries
697:(Cal. 1972)
212:Concurrence
155:Byron White
1280:Categories
338:References
304:certiorari
283:interfered
60:Docket no.
428:0048-1572
403:0164-4297
378:0885-856X
90:L. Ed. 2d
70:Citations
526:case law
441:Text of
422:: 1031.
311:See also
259:roll-off
204:Majority
397:: 739.
372:: 119.
114:Holding
1258:(2023)
1250:(2019)
1242:(1998)
1234:(1993)
1226:(1989)
1205:(1987)
1197:(1951)
1153:(2024)
1145:(2020)
1137:(2011)
1129:(1994)
1121:(1993)
1113:(1991)
1105:(1989)
1097:(1976)
1089:(1968)
1081:(1962)
1073:(1958)
1054:(2002)
1046:(1992)
1038:(1977)
1001:(2019)
993:(2019)
985:(2017)
977:(2016)
969:(2016)
961:(2015)
953:(2014)
945:(2008)
937:(2008)
929:(2007)
921:(2006)
913:(2006)
905:(2006)
889:(2005)
881:(2004)
873:(2002)
865:(2002)
857:(1993)
849:(1990)
841:(1990)
833:(1989)
825:(1989)
817:(1988)
809:(1988)
801:(1988)
793:(1987)
785:(1986)
777:(1986)
769:(1985)
761:(1985)
753:(1984)
745:(1982)
729:(1980)
721:(1978)
713:(1977)
705:(1976)
689:(1972)
681:(1971)
673:(1947)
665:(1879)
646:(2021)
638:(2017)
630:(2016)
622:(2012)
614:(2010)
606:(2003)
598:(2003)
590:(1991)
582:(1983)
574:(1980)
566:(1962)
558:(1910)
488:
482:
479:
473:
470:
467:Justia
464:
461:
455:
426:
401:
376:
189:
187:·
185:
177:
175:·
173:
165:
163:·
161:
153:
151:·
149:
64:88-556
1062:Other
449:
103:Prior
451:U.S.
424:ISSN
399:ISSN
374:ISSN
83:more
75:U.S.
73:492
447:492
414:".
389:".
92:219
78:257
1282::
445:,
420:51
418:.
395:22
393:.
370:26
368:.
516:e
509:t
502:v
430:.
405:.
380:.
86:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.