42:
296:
with its contracts with its customers. In the subsequent jury trial, BFI was found liable on both claims. In a separate one-day trial on the damages, the jury settled on compensatory damages of $ 51,146, and punitive damages of $ 6 million. The trial court then awarded Kelco
276:
market since it entered the roll-off market in 1976. Joseph Kelley was a district manager for BFI until 1980, when he left to found his own company, Kelco
Disposal. By 1982, Kelco had garnered over 40% of the roll-off market; in that year, BFI began a campaign of
312:. The Second Circuit affirmed the trial court's decision on both liability and damages, finding for the sake of argument that the jury's punitive-damage award was not excessive whether or not the Eighth Amendment applied to this case. The Supreme Court granted
1301:
342:
285:
457:
327:
305:
118:
93:
337:
534:
309:
301:
and attorney's fees on the anti-trust claim, but awarded $ 6,066,082.74 on the alternative state tort claim, so further action proceeded on the basis of the higher award.
250:
131:
281:, which continued for several months, with the intent of driving Kelco out of the business. In 1985, BFI sold their Burlington operations to another company.
1296:
332:
1306:
525:
1311:
680:
246:
46:
318:
to consider the specific question of whether the excessive fines clause applies to civil cases involving purely private parties.
1160:
518:
1249:
375:
Ghiardi, James D. (1990). "Punitive
Damages: State Extraction Practice Is Subject to Eighth Amendment Limitations".
265:
1112:
784:
1265:
1212:
776:
1241:
637:
511:
17:
486:
1224:
1088:
688:
573:
565:
189:
157:
74:
1195:
992:
936:
816:
461:
293:
289:
85:
952:
848:
840:
824:
808:
653:
597:
468:
1053:
1008:
744:
645:
605:
273:
269:
1120:
1045:
1000:
872:
864:
792:
768:
736:
704:
613:
314:
1136:
1128:
1104:
1029:
920:
888:
856:
752:
696:
672:
629:
621:
581:
434:
409:
384:
278:
181:
169:
149:
1257:
1152:
1037:
976:
968:
896:
832:
800:
760:
720:
712:
254:
1096:
960:
928:
912:
904:
880:
728:
503:
201:
1204:
1144:
1080:
1061:
984:
477:
298:
193:
177:
1290:
589:
944:
88:
165:
65:
Browning-Ferris
Industries of Vt., Inc., el al. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc., et al.
438:
413:
388:
292:. Kelco also claimed, as an alternative state-law cause of action, that BFI
100:
495:
218:
Blackmun, joined by
Rehnquist, Brennan, White, Marshall, Scalia, Kennedy
134:'s prohibition on excessive fines when the United States is not a party.
396:
Petrie, D. B. (1990). "The
Punitive Damages and the Constitution after
1234:
Browning-Ferris
Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.
454:
Browning-Ferris
Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.
130:
Awards of punitive damages in civil cases are not subject to the
421:
Sneiderman, S. H. (1990). "The Future of
Punitive Damages after
343:
List of United States
Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist Court
1183:
546:
507:
41:
257:
awards in civil cases when the United States is not a party.
1302:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
286:
United States District Court for the District of Vermont
253:'s prohibition of unreasonable fines does not apply to
328:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 492
119:
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
338:
Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume
1223:
1194:
1072:
1019:
664:
557:
230:
222:
214:
209:
138:
124:
113:
108:
80:
70:
60:
53:
34:
245:, 492 U.S. 257 (1989), was a case in which the
519:
8:
423:Browning-Ferris Industries v. Kelco Disposal
398:Browning-Ferris Industries v. Kelco Disposal
242:Browning-Ferris Industries v. Kelco Disposal
35:Browning-Ferris Industries v. Kelco Disposal
18:Browning-Ferris Industries v. Kelco Disposal
1191:
1180:
554:
543:
526:
512:
504:
361:Opinion of the court, 492 U.S. 257, 260ff.
31:
333:List of United States Supreme Court cases
268:(BFI) had been the dominant provider of
354:
681:Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber
29:1989 United States Supreme Court case
7:
288:alleging that BFI had violated the
247:Supreme Court of the United States
47:Supreme Court of the United States
25:
1297:United States Supreme Court cases
464:257 (1989) is available from:
304:BFI appealed the judgment to the
284:In 1984, Kelco filed suit in the
272:trash collection services in the
377:Tort & Insurance Law Journal
40:
1307:Excessive Fines Clause case law
306:Second Circuit Court of Appeals
1312:1989 in United States case law
1161:City of Grants Pass v. Johnson
535:United States Eighth Amendment
308:, and raised the issue of the
1:
548:Cruel and unusual punishment
1250:United States v. Bajakajian
234:O'Connor, joined by Stevens
226:Brennan, joined by Marshall
1328:
496:Oyez (oral argument audio)
266:Browning-Ferris Industries
1190:
1179:
1113:South Carolina v. Gathers
785:Skipper v. South Carolina
553:
542:
402:Arizona State Law Journal
143:
129:
39:
1266:Tyler v. Hennepin County
1213:United States v. Salerno
1185:Excessive bail and fines
1242:Austin v. United States
777:Caldwell v. Mississippi
638:Montgomery v. Louisiana
1225:Excessive Fines Clause
1089:Robinson v. California
705:California v. Anderson
689:McGautha v. California
574:Robinson v. California
566:Weems v. United States
427:Ohio State Law Journal
310:excessive fines clause
158:William J. Brennan Jr.
1196:Excessive Bail Clause
937:Panetti v. Quarterman
817:Maynard v. Cartwright
290:Sherman Antitrust Act
99:109 S. Ct. 2909; 106
56:Decided June 26, 1989
54:Argued April 18, 1989
953:Kennedy v. Louisiana
849:Whitmore v. Arkansas
841:Stanford v. Kentucky
825:Thompson v. Oklahoma
809:Lowenfield v. Phelps
654:Jones v. Mississippi
598:Harmelin v. Michigan
1129:Helling v. McKinney
1054:Hudson v. McMillian
1020:Corporal punishment
1009:Bucklew v. Precythe
745:Spaziano v. Florida
646:Virginia v. LeBlanc
606:Ewing v. California
487:Library of Congress
274:Burlington, Vermont
190:Sandra Day O'Connor
1121:Payne v. Tennessee
1046:Ingraham v. Wright
1001:Madison v. Alabama
873:Atkins v. Virginia
865:Herrera v. Collins
793:Ford v. Wainwright
769:Glass v. Louisiana
737:Godfrey v. Georgia
614:Lockyer v. Andrade
154:Associate Justices
1284:
1283:
1280:
1279:
1276:
1275:
1175:
1174:
1171:
1170:
1137:Farmer v. Brennan
1105:Estelle v. Gamble
1030:Jackson v. Bishop
921:Hill v. McDonough
889:Tennard v. Dretke
857:Walton v. Arizona
753:Enmund v. Florida
697:Furman v. Georgia
673:Wilkerson v. Utah
630:Miller v. Alabama
622:Graham v. Florida
582:Rummel v. Estelle
279:predatory pricing
238:
237:
170:Thurgood Marshall
150:William Rehnquist
16:(Redirected from
1319:
1258:Timbs v. Indiana
1192:
1181:
1153:Kahler v. Kansas
1038:Gates v. Collier
977:Hurst v. Florida
969:Glossip v. Gross
897:Roper v. Simmons
833:Penry v. Lynaugh
801:Tison v. Arizona
761:Pulley v. Harris
721:Coker v. Georgia
713:Gregg v. Georgia
555:
544:
528:
521:
514:
505:
500:
494:
491:
485:
482:
476:
473:
467:
442:
417:
392:
362:
359:
251:Eighth Amendment
139:Court membership
132:Eighth Amendment
117:Appeal from the
44:
43:
32:
21:
1327:
1326:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1272:
1219:
1186:
1167:
1097:Powell v. Texas
1068:
1041:(5th Cir. 1974)
1033:(8th Cir. 1968)
1021:
1015:
961:Hall v. Florida
929:Kansas v. Marsh
913:Oregon v. Guzek
908:(5th Cir. 2005)
905:Bigby v. Dretke
881:Ring v. Arizona
729:Lockett v. Ohio
660:
549:
538:
532:
498:
492:
489:
483:
480:
474:
471:
465:
449:
420:
395:
374:
371:
369:Further reading
366:
365:
360:
356:
351:
324:
263:
255:punitive-damage
202:Anthony Kennedy
192:
182:John P. Stevens
180:
168:
104:
55:
49:
30:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1325:
1323:
1315:
1314:
1309:
1304:
1299:
1289:
1288:
1282:
1281:
1278:
1277:
1274:
1273:
1271:
1270:
1262:
1254:
1246:
1238:
1229:
1227:
1221:
1220:
1218:
1217:
1209:
1205:Stack v. Boyle
1200:
1198:
1188:
1187:
1184:
1177:
1176:
1173:
1172:
1169:
1168:
1166:
1165:
1157:
1149:
1145:Brown v. Plata
1141:
1133:
1125:
1117:
1109:
1101:
1093:
1085:
1081:Trop v. Dulles
1076:
1074:
1070:
1069:
1067:
1066:
1062:Hope v. Pelzer
1058:
1050:
1042:
1034:
1025:
1023:
1017:
1016:
1014:
1013:
1005:
997:
993:Moore v. Texas
989:
985:Kansas v. Carr
981:
973:
965:
957:
949:
941:
933:
925:
917:
909:
901:
893:
885:
877:
869:
861:
853:
845:
837:
829:
821:
813:
805:
797:
789:
781:
773:
765:
757:
749:
741:
733:
725:
717:
709:
701:
693:
685:
677:
668:
666:
662:
661:
659:
658:
650:
642:
634:
626:
618:
610:
602:
594:
586:
578:
570:
561:
559:
551:
550:
547:
540:
539:
533:
531:
530:
523:
516:
508:
502:
501:
469:Google Scholar
448:
447:External links
445:
444:
443:
418:
393:
370:
367:
364:
363:
353:
352:
350:
347:
346:
345:
340:
335:
330:
323:
320:
299:treble damages
262:
259:
249:held that the
236:
235:
232:
231:Concur/dissent
228:
227:
224:
220:
219:
216:
212:
211:
207:
206:
205:
204:
194:Antonin Scalia
178:Harry Blackmun
155:
152:
147:
141:
140:
136:
135:
127:
126:
122:
121:
115:
111:
110:
106:
105:
98:
82:
78:
77:
72:
68:
67:
62:
61:Full case name
58:
57:
51:
50:
45:
37:
36:
28:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1324:
1313:
1310:
1308:
1305:
1303:
1300:
1298:
1295:
1294:
1292:
1268:
1267:
1263:
1260:
1259:
1255:
1252:
1251:
1247:
1244:
1243:
1239:
1236:
1235:
1231:
1230:
1228:
1226:
1222:
1215:
1214:
1210:
1207:
1206:
1202:
1201:
1199:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1182:
1178:
1163:
1162:
1158:
1155:
1154:
1150:
1147:
1146:
1142:
1139:
1138:
1134:
1131:
1130:
1126:
1123:
1122:
1118:
1115:
1114:
1110:
1107:
1106:
1102:
1099:
1098:
1094:
1091:
1090:
1086:
1083:
1082:
1078:
1077:
1075:
1071:
1064:
1063:
1059:
1056:
1055:
1051:
1048:
1047:
1043:
1040:
1039:
1035:
1032:
1031:
1027:
1026:
1024:
1018:
1011:
1010:
1006:
1003:
1002:
998:
995:
994:
990:
987:
986:
982:
979:
978:
974:
971:
970:
966:
963:
962:
958:
955:
954:
950:
947:
946:
942:
939:
938:
934:
931:
930:
926:
923:
922:
918:
915:
914:
910:
907:
906:
902:
899:
898:
894:
891:
890:
886:
883:
882:
878:
875:
874:
870:
867:
866:
862:
859:
858:
854:
851:
850:
846:
843:
842:
838:
835:
834:
830:
827:
826:
822:
819:
818:
814:
811:
810:
806:
803:
802:
798:
795:
794:
790:
787:
786:
782:
779:
778:
774:
771:
770:
766:
763:
762:
758:
755:
754:
750:
747:
746:
742:
739:
738:
734:
731:
730:
726:
723:
722:
718:
715:
714:
710:
707:
706:
702:
699:
698:
694:
691:
690:
686:
683:
682:
678:
675:
674:
670:
669:
667:
665:Death penalty
663:
656:
655:
651:
648:
647:
643:
640:
639:
635:
632:
631:
627:
624:
623:
619:
616:
615:
611:
608:
607:
603:
600:
599:
595:
592:
591:
590:Solem v. Helm
587:
584:
583:
579:
576:
575:
571:
568:
567:
563:
562:
560:
558:Incarceration
556:
552:
545:
541:
536:
529:
524:
522:
517:
515:
510:
509:
506:
497:
488:
479:
470:
463:
459:
455:
451:
450:
446:
440:
436:
432:
428:
424:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
399:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
373:
372:
368:
358:
355:
348:
344:
341:
339:
336:
334:
331:
329:
326:
325:
321:
319:
317:
316:
311:
307:
302:
300:
295:
291:
287:
282:
280:
275:
271:
267:
261:Prior history
260:
258:
256:
252:
248:
244:
243:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
210:Case opinions
208:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
156:
153:
151:
148:
146:Chief Justice
145:
144:
142:
137:
133:
128:
123:
120:
116:
112:
107:
102:
96:
95:
90:
87:
83:
79:
76:
73:
69:
66:
63:
59:
52:
48:
38:
33:
27:
19:
1264:
1256:
1248:
1240:
1233:
1232:
1211:
1203:
1159:
1151:
1143:
1135:
1127:
1119:
1111:
1103:
1095:
1087:
1079:
1060:
1052:
1044:
1036:
1028:
1007:
999:
991:
983:
975:
967:
959:
951:
945:Baze v. Rees
943:
935:
927:
919:
911:
903:
895:
887:
879:
871:
863:
855:
847:
839:
831:
823:
815:
807:
799:
791:
783:
775:
767:
759:
751:
748:(1981, 1984)
743:
735:
727:
719:
711:
703:
695:
687:
679:
671:
652:
644:
636:
628:
620:
612:
604:
596:
588:
580:
572:
564:
453:
430:
426:
422:
405:
401:
397:
380:
376:
357:
313:
303:
283:
264:
241:
240:
239:
197:
185:
173:
161:
109:Case history
92:
64:
26:
1022:or injuries
708:(Cal. 1972)
223:Concurrence
166:Byron White
1291:Categories
349:References
315:certiorari
294:interfered
71:Docket no.
439:0048-1572
414:0164-4297
389:0885-856X
101:L. Ed. 2d
81:Citations
537:case law
452:Text of
433:: 1031.
322:See also
270:roll-off
215:Majority
408:: 739.
383:: 119.
125:Holding
1269:(2023)
1261:(2019)
1253:(1998)
1245:(1993)
1237:(1989)
1216:(1987)
1208:(1951)
1164:(2024)
1156:(2020)
1148:(2011)
1140:(1994)
1132:(1993)
1124:(1991)
1116:(1989)
1108:(1976)
1100:(1968)
1092:(1962)
1084:(1958)
1065:(2002)
1057:(1992)
1049:(1977)
1012:(2019)
1004:(2019)
996:(2017)
988:(2016)
980:(2016)
972:(2015)
964:(2014)
956:(2008)
948:(2008)
940:(2007)
932:(2006)
924:(2006)
916:(2006)
900:(2005)
892:(2004)
884:(2002)
876:(2002)
868:(1993)
860:(1990)
852:(1990)
844:(1989)
836:(1989)
828:(1988)
820:(1988)
812:(1988)
804:(1987)
796:(1986)
788:(1986)
780:(1985)
772:(1985)
764:(1984)
756:(1982)
740:(1980)
732:(1978)
724:(1977)
716:(1976)
700:(1972)
692:(1971)
684:(1947)
676:(1879)
657:(2021)
649:(2017)
641:(2016)
633:(2012)
625:(2010)
617:(2003)
609:(2003)
601:(1991)
593:(1983)
585:(1980)
577:(1962)
569:(1910)
499:
493:
490:
484:
481:
478:Justia
475:
472:
466:
437:
412:
387:
200:
198:·
196:
188:
186:·
184:
176:
174:·
172:
164:
162:·
160:
75:88-556
1073:Other
460:
114:Prior
462:U.S.
435:ISSN
410:ISSN
385:ISSN
94:more
86:U.S.
84:492
458:492
425:".
400:".
103:219
89:257
1293::
456:,
431:51
429:.
406:22
404:.
381:26
379:.
527:e
520:t
513:v
441:.
416:.
391:.
97:)
91:(
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.