42:
460:
364:
327:
to lift the injunction on 16 May 2011, Thomas commented: "Yet again my name and reputation have been trashed while the man I had a relationship with is able to hide. What's more I can't even defend myself because I have been gagged. If this is the way privacy injunctions are supposed to work there is
671:
on 23 May 2011: "It is rather unsustainable, this situation, where newspapers can't print something that clearly everybody else is talking about, but there's a difficulty here because the law is the law and the judges must interpret what the law is. What I've said in the past is, the danger is that
745:
in Europe, said that people who do "bad things" on the site would need to defend themselves under the laws of their own jurisdiction in the event of controversy, and that the site would hand over information about users to the authorities when it was legally required to do so.
723:
between 1995 and 2001, described the situation surrounding privacy injunctions as "a shambles", and proposed that
Parliament should amend the law so that judges would be able to grant injunctions only where issues "impact on public authorities and the State".
599:
On 15 December 2011, Mr
Justice Eady accepted that Thomas had not attempted to blackmail the footballer known as CTB, and suggested "There is no longer any point in maintaining the anonymity." The injunction preventing the naming of CTB remained in place.
302:. Eady denied in the ruling that he was "introducing a law of privacy by the back door", which had been a common criticism of his decisions in the UK media, and stated that the principles involved in the ruling were "readily apparent from the terms of the
164:, preventing the naming of the footballer in the media, then extending it on 21 April 2011. The injunction was initially intended to prevent details of the case – an alleged extra-marital relationship between Giggs and Thomas – from being published in
250:
with the
Twitter username "@unknownj". Webley denied being the source of the leak, and pointed to a web page written by a man named Michael Wheeler that he had read on the same day, which he said strongly hinted that Giggs was the person involved.
444:." On 21 May 2011, lawyers at Schillings denied that they were suing Twitter, and said that they had made an application "to obtain limited information concerning the unlawful use of Twitter by a small number of individuals who may have breached a
689:, who named Ryan Giggs in the House of Commons, described the affair as "a joke", and commented: "The judges' application of privacy law, which is ill conceived to start with, is now close to breaking point, under pressure from the biggest act of
763:
commented: "I advise my clients that an injunction will not be effective. There have been too many examples of people breaking injunctions, getting round them by releasing material on to the
Internet." He also suggested creating a statutory
440:. London-based lawyer James Quartermaine commented: "Twitter will probably just ignore it and consider it to be offensive to their First Amendment rights. It's probably an attempt to try and show that actions have consequences in
974:
709:: "This only became a story because the footballer is pursuing legal action against Twitter. In the UK, I think the system is going to have to change. People are going to realise that it is an infringement of the right to
487:
on its front page, with the word "CENSORED" covering his eyes. The paper added in its editorial column, "Today we identify the footballer whose name has been linked to a court superinjunction by thousands of postings on
496:
also stated: "We should point out immediately that we are not accusing the footballer concerned of any misdeed. Whether the allegations against him are true or not has no relevance to this debate. The issue is one of
281:
In delivering his ruling on the case on 16 May 2011, Eady argued: "It will rarely be the case that the privacy rights of an individual or of his family will have to yield in priority to what has been described in the
564:
to lift the injunction and allow CTB to be named. He argued that "the court's duty remains to try and protect the claimant, and particularly his family, from intrusion and harassment so long as it can."
613:
s owners News Group
Newspapers, Richard Spearman said: "We didn't identify him. We didn't intend to identify him. On the damages for publication, it is dead in the water, this case." On 2 March 2012,
1195:
2203:
1492:
492:. Why? Because we believe it is unsustainable that the law can be used to prevent newspapers from publishing information that readers can access on the internet at the click of a mouse." The
1138:
1020:
274:
were posted on
Twitter and subsequently reported in a number of non-UK media sources. The allegations were repeatedly reposted online by other users, in a similar response to that of the
1280:
603:
On 21 February 2012, Ryan Giggs consented in the High Court to being named as the claimant known as CTB. Hugh
Tomlinson, acting for Giggs, said that his client was claiming damages from
978:
383:
as an advisor, action has been undertaken by the footballer against
Twitter in an attempt to obtain information on some of the users involved in naming Giggs. The action is known as
1969:
672:
judgments are effectively writing a new law which is what parliament is meant to do." He added that the law should be reviewed to "catch up with how people consume media today".
295:
1703:
185:, naming Giggs as the footballer involved, there was widespread discussion in the UK and international media on the issue of how court injunctions can be enforced in the age of
287:
262:
that had been mentioned in the media. This included the claim that the married footballer known as CTB had been involved in a seven-month extra-marital relationship with model
171:
1891:
1909:
2034:
540:
was not sold in
England or Wales, and added that the footballer's name and photo were exclusive to the print edition and had not been posted on the newspaper's website.
433:
2146:
682:, commented: "The law essentially is a practical thing. It looks to me like the English law, English injunctions, look increasingly impractical in the modern world."
192:
On 23 May 2011, Justice Eady rejected News Group
Newspapers' application to lift the injunction, despite pressure from the public and government. Later the same day,
2319:
1109:
629:
401:", observing that mentions of his name had significantly increased after the case against Twitter had been reported in the news. According to measurement company
2389:
2338:
777:
2189:
1581:
856:
1334:
1305:
328:
something seriously wrong with the law." Eady said that he could not "come to any final conclusion" on whether there had been an attempt at blackmail.
2384:
266:. While Thomas could be named in the UK media, the identity of CTB could not. On the same date, messages saying that the identity of claimant CTB was
259:
2379:
2002:
1024:
649:
2102:
1290:
790:
581:
545:
652:, commented that modern technology was "out of control", and called for measures to prevent court injunctions from being breached on the web.
2229:
1167:
41:
2374:
1449:
659:
1979:
2348:
783:
307:
286:
as 'tittle-tattle about the activities of footballers' wives and girlfriends.'" He also argued that a balance had to be struck between
2196:
1731:
2404:
2399:
2290:
2262:
1888:
1675:
1521:
310:
itself." The Human Rights Act 1998 had been passed by the UK government, and incorporated the terms of the Convention into UK law.
2234:
1081:
2394:
2369:
641:
644:, also indicated that the law on privacy in the UK will be reviewed in the light of controversies over privacy injunctions.
632:
was published on 20 May 2011. It recommended that super-injunctions "can only be granted when they are strictly necessary".
1363:
2409:
1391:
667:
720:
716:
1777:
713:. People are going to get sick of the rich and powerful being able to suppress things they do not want to get out."
625:
In response to criticism of previous super-injunctions in the UK media, a report by a committee of judges headed by
2224:
928:
899:
679:
422:
343:
was ready to take advantage of these prearranged meetings in order to be able to put forward the claim that it was
2297:
1454:
686:
577:
246:
by James Webley on 14 April 2011, the day of the initial granting of the injunction. Webley is a UK citizen from
197:
2239:
605:
323:
214:
166:
1591:
1647:
846:
2283:
2245:
1748:
645:
585:
509:
229:
star" had met Thomas at luxury hotels during a "six-month fling", but did not name the footballer involved.
201:
2343:
796:
573:
498:
193:
2304:
885:
525:
303:
157:
52:
1939:
1420:
1110:"Manchester United's Ryan Giggs Is The Footballer Who Allegedly Had Affair With Model Imogen Thomas"
993:
2333:
2151:
2039:
1974:
1914:
626:
569:
had argued that the injunction was "futile" given the level of knowledge of the footballer's name.
243:
690:
275:
138:
17:
2117:
1476:
1114:
828:
760:
2128:
Sky News – Giggs Named In Commons As Footballer Identified On Twitter In Context Of Injunctions
459:
425:
book had been openly on sale in Australia and other countries, despite being banned in the UK.
2161:
710:
614:
609:
for the subsequent re-publication of information in other newspapers and on the Internet. For
593:
437:
299:
267:
126:
738:
to break court injunctions, arguing that the site was "not a place for reasoned discussion".
331:
It was stated in the ruling that Imogen Thomas had "at some stage engaged the services of Mr
960:
751:
517:
398:
349:
234:
220:
258:
was created under the name "Billy Jones", and posted the alleged details of several of the
2110:
2007:
1945:
1895:
1680:
904:
727:
705:
637:
432:, and legal experts pointed out the difficulties in suing in a United States court, where
339:, and that the purpose of meetings Thomas had arranged with the footballer had been "that
881:
363:
2269:
2121:
1310:
1139:"Imogen Thomas footballer lover named by foreign papers not affected by UK injunctions"
731:
633:
541:
318:
283:
226:
2171:
2136:
242:
of the alleged relationship between Giggs and Thomas may have been posted at 10:02 PM
2363:
2181:
2105:
1586:
655:
475:
465:
429:
406:
263:
142:
1898:
Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury, Master of the Rolls, www.judiciary.gov.uk, 20 May 2011
1782:
1753:
1652:
1526:
1396:
1368:
1285:
1172:
1143:
1086:
675:
411:
332:
186:
1861:
1364:"Twitter traffic sees 22% spike in rush to find identity of injunction footballer"
696:
2158:
2062:
1251:
1744:
1223:
1077:
700:
445:
321:
50,000 and £100,000, a claim she strongly denied. Following a failed attempt by
122:
2127:
1425:
513:
484:
441:
417:
380:
371:
in May 2011 was repeatedly reposted, leading to controversy over the right to
271:
153:
149:
130:
108:
2035:"Lord Wakeham: law must be changed to stop judges handing out gagging orders"
2276:
1306:"Twitter Inc., Unknown Posters Sued by Athlete Known as 'CTB' at U.K. Court"
801:
756:
521:
336:
314:
247:
178:
134:
2147:
Super-injunctions: Modern technology is beyond control, not out of control
1450:"CTB footballer facing backlash as lawyers claim he 'isn't suing Twitter'"
405:, traffic on Twitter in the UK rose by 22% after the action was reported.
2175:
2165:
2140:
2096:
2092:
2067:
1838:
1833:
1810:
1805:
1708:
1623:
1618:
1557:
1552:
1497:
1228:
1200:
1046:
851:
480:
1335:"He-Who-Cannot-Be-Named (In The UK) Sues Twitter Over A User Naming Him"
2130:
742:
735:
502:
489:
402:
372:
368:
291:
255:
239:
182:
1910:"Kenneth Clarke signals privacy law to ease fears over gagging orders"
1339:
393:
174:, which guarantees the right to respect for private and family life.
161:
1082:"Imogen Thomas 'blackmailed' superinjunction footballer, judge says"
847:"MP Names Footballer at Centre of Gagging Order in House of Commons"
1778:"Imogen Thomas 'vindicated' after footballer drops blackmail claim"
596:, who argued "this is not about secrecy, this is about intrusion."
975:"Banker refutes claim that he was first to break super injunction"
458:
362:
765:
663:
617:
refused to grant relief to Giggs, ending the claim for damages.
388:
2185:
1021:"Imogen Thomas is from Wales. Who else do you know from Wales?"
588:
to name Ryan Giggs as the footballer CTB. A second attempt by
1866:
1256:
1051:
933:
313:
The ruling also suggested that Imogen Thomas had attempted to
1648:"Sun fails in latest bid to lift footballer's gagging order"
592:
to overturn the injunction later in the day was rejected by
2003:"Knowledge (XXG) founder opens new front in privacy battle"
1970:"Newspaper publishes name of footballer with gagging order"
1281:"Twitter asked to stop users from gossiping then gets sued"
1889:
Super-Injunctions, Anonymised Injunctions and Open Justice
1392:"Twitter and WikiLeaks have made a mockery of the courts"
997:
1806:"Ryan Giggs can be legally named as 'affair' footballer"
501:
and of a growing argument in favour of more restrictive
2137:
South Tyneside Council 'gets Twitter data' in blog case
2063:"Twitter's European boss Tony Wang gives legal warning"
560:
On 23 May 2011, Eady refused a fresh application from
528:
ruling had no force in Scotland, unless copies of the
483:
newspaper, published a thinly-disguised photograph of
218:
published a story entitled "Footie star's affair with
1522:"Scottish newspaper identifies injunction footballer"
1421:"British Soccer Star Sues Twitter Over Privacy Issue"
296:
Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights
2093:
Could Twitter become a threat to the justice system?
958:"The leftie banker who outed Giggs". Richard Woods,
548:, said that no legal action was planned against the
536:
editor Richard Walker indicated to the BBC that the
288:
Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights
254:
On 8 May 2011, an account on social networking site
172:
Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights
2326:
2314:
2254:
2217:
1553:"Sunday Herald names footballer accused on Twitter"
104:
99:
89:
84:
76:
68:
58:
48:
34:
1938:
1908:Winnett, Robert; Hope, Christopher (18 May 2011).
2103:Gossip frenzy! And the law is left looking an ass
1619:"Privacy injunctions unsustainable, says Cameron"
1168:"Super-injunction: Twitter traffic record broken"
1834:"Ryan Giggs loses damages claim against the Sun"
1047:"Twitter user in bid to break super-injunctions"
2320:List of privacy injunction cases in English law
1704:"Gagging Order: MP Names Footballer In Commons"
1493:"Newspaper Claims To ID Injunction Footie Star"
1304:Lumley, James; Fortado, Lindsay (20 May 2011).
900:"Twitter's Super-Duper U.K. Censorship Trouble"
397:magazine remarked: "Giggs has not heard of the
63:CTB v News Group Newspapers Limited & Anor
1520:Gabbatt, Adam; Taylor, Matthew (22 May 2011).
1252:"Footballer takes proceedings against Twitter"
954:
952:
878:CTB v News Group Newspapers Limited & Anor
53:High Court of Justice (Queen's Bench Division)
2197:
1547:
1545:
929:"Social media making mockery of privacy laws"
824:
822:
820:
818:
816:
8:
2339:2011 British privacy injunctions controversy
1862:"Media concession made in injunction report"
1749:"Injunction remains despite MP's revelation"
1196:"Twitter Users Hit Back At Footballer's Gag"
778:2011 British privacy injunctions controversy
177:Following the publication of details of the
1940:"Technology out of control, says top judge"
1072:
1070:
2204:
2190:
2182:
2028:
2026:
1937:Croft, Jane; Bradshaw, Tim (20 May 2011).
1613:
1611:
1609:
830:CTB v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Anor
556:Naming in Parliament and subsequent events
347:which had found him 'romping with a busty
40:
31:
841:
839:
2172:Why super-injunctions don't happen in US
812:
650:Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales
170:. The ruling of the court was based on
791:Mosley v News Group Newspapers Limited
546:Attorney General for England and Wales
508:Giggs' lawyers had not applied for an
1676:"Committee to look at gagging orders"
734:, expressed concern about the use of
225:s Imogen Thomas". It claimed that "a
7:
996:. www.pseudonode.com. Archived from
859:from the original on 16 October 2012
833:. High Court of Justice. 16 May 2011
660:Prime Minister of the United Kingdom
415:, compared the CTB situation to the
385:CTB v. Twitter Inc., Persons Unknown
94:CTB v. Twitter Inc., Persons Unknown
2390:United Kingdom free speech case law
1776:Plunkett, John (15 December 2011).
1023:. News Media Images. Archived from
784:Ferdinand v Mirror Group Newspapers
428:The headquarters of Twitter are in
359:Legal action after posts on Twitter
2212:Privacy injunctions in English law
1019:Wheeler, Michael (14 April 2011).
25:
2291:RJW v Guardian News and Media Ltd
2263:CTB v. News Group Newspapers Ltd.
882:[2011] EWHC 1232 (QB)
18:CTB v. News Group Newspapers Ltd.
2385:Censorship in the United Kingdom
2159:Twitter's super-injunction surge
2001:Rawlinson, Kevin (23 May 2011).
1747:; Halliday, Josh (23 May 2011).
1419:Malinowski, Eric (20 May 2011).
1279:Malinowski, Erik (20 May 2011).
1224:"Human Rights Act: How it works"
1080:; Halliday, Josh (16 May 2011).
927:Wilkinson, Peter (23 May 2011).
298:, which guarantees the right to
290:, which guarantees the right to
2380:2011 in United Kingdom case law
2118:Sex, lies and super-injunctions
1362:Arthur, Charles (23 May 2011).
703:commented in an interview with
532:were sold in England or Wales.
2033:Rayner, Gordon (24 May 2011).
1646:Halliday, Josh (23 May 2011).
1137:Collins, David (11 May 2011).
642:Secretary of State for Justice
421:affair of the 1980s, in which
260:anonymised privacy injunctions
1:
1968:Evans, Martin (22 May 2011).
1333:Hill, Kashmir (20 May 2011).
1166:Barnett, Emma (23 May 2011).
992:Webley, James (29 May 2011).
977:. 31 May 2011. Archived from
524:. This meant that the London
139:News Group Newspapers Limited
1580:Massie, Alex (22 May 2011).
898:Brito, Jerry (21 May 2011).
755:on 29 May 2011, Ryan Giggs'
379:Using London-based law firm
2375:High Court of Justice cases
721:Press Complaints Commission
204:to name Ryan Giggs as CTB.
118:CTB v News Group Newspapers
35:CTB v News Group Newspapers
2426:
1448:Shah, Kavi (21 May 2011).
680:First Minister of Scotland
469:front page on 22 May 2011.
152:granted first a temporary
2298:Andrew Marr and anonymous
1582:"The Footballer is Named"
39:
2405:English privacy case law
2400:The Sun (United Kingdom)
2240:Contra mundum injunction
2284:Terry v Persons Unknown
2246:Interdicts in Scots law
1232:. UK. 29 September 2000
994:"A few clarifications…"
741:Tony Wang, the head of
586:parliamentary privilege
238:, the first mention on
202:parliamentary privilege
2344:Privacy in English law
2315:Anonymised injunctions
2255:Super-injunction cases
2230:Anonymised injunctions
2108:and Andrew McCorkell,
1814:. UK. 21 February 2012
797:Privacy in English law
730:, the inventor of the
719:, the chairman of the
693:seen for many years."
499:freedom of information
470:
436:protection applies to
376:
306:, and indeed from the
2395:Twitter controversies
2370:Human rights case law
2305:NMC v Persons Unknown
1289:. USA. Archived from
685:Member of Parliament
576:Member of Parliament
462:
366:
335:", the well-known UK
300:freedom of expression
2349:Breach of confidence
1978:. UK. Archived from
1590:. UK. Archived from
884: (16 May 2011),
615:Mr Justice Tugendhat
594:Mr Justice Tugendhat
572:The same afternoon,
473:On 22 May 2011, the
137:CTB, and defendants
2410:Internet censorship
2334:Neuberger Committee
2152:The Daily Telegraph
2040:The Daily Telegraph
1975:The Daily Telegraph
1915:The Daily Telegraph
888:(England and Wales)
855:. UK. 24 May 2011.
728:Sir Tim Berners-Lee
627:Master of the Rolls
409:, former editor of
317:the footballer for
308:European Convention
1894:2011-06-26 at the
1842:. UK. 2 March 2012
1732:HC Deb 23 May 2011
691:civil disobedience
471:
377:
276:Twitter Joke Trial
212:On 14 April 2011,
148:On 14 April 2011,
123:English legal case
2357:
2356:
2235:Super-injunctions
2162:Rory Cellan-Jones
2071:. UK. 25 May 2011
1870:. UK. 20 May 2011
1712:. UK. 23 May 2011
1684:. UK. 23 May 2011
1627:. UK. 23 May 2011
1561:. UK. 22 May 2011
1501:. UK. 22 May 2011
1400:. UK. 22 May 2011
1260:. UK. 20 May 2011
1204:. UK. 21 May 2011
1118:. USA. 9 May 2011
438:freedom of speech
278:the year before.
268:Manchester United
127:Manchester United
114:
113:
16:(Redirected from
2417:
2206:
2199:
2192:
2183:
2149:Shane Richmond,
2124:. 28 April 2011.
2081:
2080:
2078:
2076:
2059:
2053:
2052:
2050:
2048:
2030:
2021:
2020:
2018:
2016:
1998:
1992:
1991:
1989:
1987:
1965:
1959:
1958:
1956:
1954:
1942:
1934:
1928:
1927:
1925:
1923:
1905:
1899:
1886:
1880:
1879:
1877:
1875:
1858:
1852:
1851:
1849:
1847:
1830:
1824:
1823:
1821:
1819:
1802:
1796:
1795:
1793:
1791:
1773:
1767:
1766:
1764:
1762:
1741:
1735:
1728:
1722:
1721:
1719:
1717:
1700:
1694:
1693:
1691:
1689:
1672:
1666:
1665:
1663:
1661:
1643:
1637:
1636:
1634:
1632:
1615:
1604:
1603:
1601:
1599:
1577:
1571:
1570:
1568:
1566:
1549:
1540:
1539:
1537:
1535:
1517:
1511:
1510:
1508:
1506:
1489:
1483:
1474:
1468:
1467:
1465:
1463:
1445:
1439:
1438:
1436:
1434:
1416:
1410:
1409:
1407:
1405:
1388:
1382:
1381:
1379:
1377:
1359:
1353:
1352:
1350:
1348:
1330:
1324:
1323:
1321:
1319:
1301:
1295:
1294:
1276:
1270:
1269:
1267:
1265:
1248:
1242:
1241:
1239:
1237:
1220:
1214:
1213:
1211:
1209:
1192:
1186:
1185:
1183:
1181:
1163:
1157:
1156:
1154:
1152:
1134:
1128:
1127:
1125:
1123:
1106:
1100:
1099:
1097:
1095:
1074:
1065:
1064:
1062:
1060:
1055:. UK. 9 May 2011
1043:
1037:
1036:
1034:
1032:
1016:
1010:
1009:
1007:
1005:
989:
983:
982:
971:
965:
961:The Sunday Times
956:
947:
946:
944:
942:
924:
918:
917:
915:
913:
895:
889:
875:
869:
868:
866:
864:
843:
834:
826:
752:The Sunday Times
582:House of Commons
574:Liberal Democrat
518:Court of Session
403:Experian Hitwise
399:Streisand effect
304:Human Rights Act
235:The Sunday Times
194:Liberal Democrat
100:Court membership
44:
32:
21:
2425:
2424:
2420:
2419:
2418:
2416:
2415:
2414:
2360:
2359:
2358:
2353:
2322:
2310:
2250:
2213:
2210:
2174:Tom Geoghegan,
2120:Duncan Lamont,
2111:The Independent
2095:Chris Summers,
2089:
2084:
2074:
2072:
2061:
2060:
2056:
2046:
2044:
2032:
2031:
2024:
2014:
2012:
2008:The Independent
2000:
1999:
1995:
1985:
1983:
1967:
1966:
1962:
1952:
1950:
1946:Financial Times
1936:
1935:
1931:
1921:
1919:
1907:
1906:
1902:
1896:Wayback Machine
1887:
1883:
1873:
1871:
1860:
1859:
1855:
1845:
1843:
1832:
1831:
1827:
1817:
1815:
1804:
1803:
1799:
1789:
1787:
1775:
1774:
1770:
1760:
1758:
1743:
1742:
1738:
1729:
1725:
1715:
1713:
1702:
1701:
1697:
1687:
1685:
1681:The Independent
1674:
1673:
1669:
1659:
1657:
1645:
1644:
1640:
1630:
1628:
1617:
1616:
1607:
1597:
1595:
1579:
1578:
1574:
1564:
1562:
1551:
1550:
1543:
1533:
1531:
1519:
1518:
1514:
1504:
1502:
1491:
1490:
1486:
1475:
1471:
1461:
1459:
1447:
1446:
1442:
1432:
1430:
1418:
1417:
1413:
1403:
1401:
1390:
1389:
1385:
1375:
1373:
1361:
1360:
1356:
1346:
1344:
1332:
1331:
1327:
1317:
1315:
1303:
1302:
1298:
1293:on 22 May 2011.
1278:
1277:
1273:
1263:
1261:
1250:
1249:
1245:
1235:
1233:
1222:
1221:
1217:
1207:
1205:
1194:
1193:
1189:
1179:
1177:
1165:
1164:
1160:
1150:
1148:
1136:
1135:
1131:
1121:
1119:
1108:
1107:
1103:
1093:
1091:
1076:
1075:
1068:
1058:
1056:
1045:
1044:
1040:
1030:
1028:
1018:
1017:
1013:
1003:
1001:
991:
990:
986:
981:on 4 June 2011.
973:
972:
968:
957:
950:
940:
938:
926:
925:
921:
911:
909:
897:
896:
892:
876:
872:
862:
860:
845:
844:
837:
827:
814:
810:
774:
759:Hugh Tomlinson
706:The Independent
697:Knowledge (XXG)
638:Lord Chancellor
623:
558:
457:
434:First Amendment
361:
210:
150:Mr Justice Eady
90:Related actions
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
2423:
2421:
2413:
2412:
2407:
2402:
2397:
2392:
2387:
2382:
2377:
2372:
2362:
2361:
2355:
2354:
2352:
2351:
2346:
2341:
2336:
2330:
2328:
2324:
2323:
2318:
2316:
2312:
2311:
2309:
2308:
2301:
2294:
2287:
2280:
2273:
2270:Ntuli v Donald
2266:
2258:
2256:
2252:
2251:
2249:
2248:
2242:
2237:
2232:
2227:
2221:
2219:
2215:
2214:
2211:
2209:
2208:
2201:
2194:
2186:
2180:
2179:
2178:. 10 May 2011.
2169:
2168:. 23 May 2011.
2156:
2155:. 20 May 2011.
2144:
2143:. 30 May 2011.
2134:
2133:. 23 May 2011.
2125:
2122:Channel 4 News
2115:
2114:. 15 May 2011.
2100:
2099:. 25 May 2011.
2088:
2087:External links
2085:
2083:
2082:
2054:
2022:
1993:
1982:on 25 May 2011
1960:
1929:
1900:
1881:
1853:
1825:
1797:
1768:
1736:
1723:
1695:
1667:
1638:
1605:
1594:on 25 May 2011
1572:
1541:
1512:
1484:
1482:, 22 May 2011.
1469:
1440:
1411:
1383:
1354:
1325:
1311:Bloomberg L.P.
1296:
1271:
1243:
1215:
1187:
1158:
1129:
1101:
1066:
1038:
1027:on 6 June 2011
1011:
1000:on 1 June 2011
984:
966:
964:, 29 May 2011.
948:
919:
890:
870:
835:
811:
809:
806:
805:
804:
799:
794:
787:
780:
773:
770:
732:World Wide Web
634:Kenneth Clarke
630:Lord Neuberger
622:
619:
557:
554:
542:Dominic Grieve
456:
450:
423:Peter Wright's
360:
357:
284:House of Lords
227:Premier League
209:
206:
112:
111:
106:
102:
101:
97:
96:
91:
87:
86:
82:
81:
78:
74:
73:
70:
66:
65:
60:
59:Full case name
56:
55:
50:
46:
45:
37:
36:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2422:
2411:
2408:
2406:
2403:
2401:
2398:
2396:
2393:
2391:
2388:
2386:
2383:
2381:
2378:
2376:
2373:
2371:
2368:
2367:
2365:
2350:
2347:
2345:
2342:
2340:
2337:
2335:
2332:
2331:
2329:
2325:
2321:
2317:
2313:
2307:
2306:
2302:
2300:
2299:
2295:
2293:
2292:
2288:
2286:
2285:
2281:
2279:
2278:
2274:
2272:
2271:
2267:
2265:
2264:
2260:
2259:
2257:
2253:
2247:
2243:
2241:
2238:
2236:
2233:
2231:
2228:
2226:
2223:
2222:
2220:
2216:
2207:
2202:
2200:
2195:
2193:
2188:
2187:
2184:
2177:
2173:
2170:
2167:
2163:
2160:
2157:
2154:
2153:
2148:
2145:
2142:
2138:
2135:
2132:
2129:
2126:
2123:
2119:
2116:
2113:
2112:
2107:
2106:David Randall
2104:
2101:
2098:
2094:
2091:
2090:
2086:
2070:
2069:
2064:
2058:
2055:
2042:
2041:
2036:
2029:
2027:
2023:
2010:
2009:
2004:
1997:
1994:
1981:
1977:
1976:
1971:
1964:
1961:
1948:
1947:
1941:
1933:
1930:
1917:
1916:
1911:
1904:
1901:
1897:
1893:
1890:
1885:
1882:
1869:
1868:
1863:
1857:
1854:
1841:
1840:
1835:
1829:
1826:
1813:
1812:
1807:
1801:
1798:
1785:
1784:
1779:
1772:
1769:
1756:
1755:
1750:
1746:
1740:
1737:
1733:
1727:
1724:
1711:
1710:
1705:
1699:
1696:
1683:
1682:
1677:
1671:
1668:
1655:
1654:
1649:
1642:
1639:
1626:
1625:
1620:
1614:
1612:
1610:
1606:
1593:
1589:
1588:
1587:The Spectator
1583:
1576:
1573:
1560:
1559:
1554:
1548:
1546:
1542:
1529:
1528:
1523:
1516:
1513:
1500:
1499:
1494:
1488:
1485:
1481:
1480:Sunday Herald
1478:
1473:
1470:
1457:
1456:
1451:
1444:
1441:
1428:
1427:
1422:
1415:
1412:
1399:
1398:
1393:
1387:
1384:
1371:
1370:
1365:
1358:
1355:
1342:
1341:
1336:
1329:
1326:
1313:
1312:
1307:
1300:
1297:
1292:
1288:
1287:
1282:
1275:
1272:
1259:
1258:
1253:
1247:
1244:
1231:
1230:
1225:
1219:
1216:
1203:
1202:
1197:
1191:
1188:
1175:
1174:
1169:
1162:
1159:
1146:
1145:
1140:
1133:
1130:
1117:
1116:
1111:
1105:
1102:
1089:
1088:
1083:
1079:
1073:
1071:
1067:
1054:
1053:
1048:
1042:
1039:
1026:
1022:
1015:
1012:
999:
995:
988:
985:
980:
976:
970:
967:
963:
962:
955:
953:
949:
936:
935:
930:
923:
920:
907:
906:
901:
894:
891:
887:
883:
879:
874:
871:
858:
854:
853:
848:
842:
840:
836:
832:
831:
825:
823:
821:
819:
817:
813:
807:
803:
800:
798:
795:
793:
792:
788:
786:
785:
781:
779:
776:
775:
771:
769:
767:
762:
758:
754:
753:
747:
744:
739:
737:
733:
729:
725:
722:
718:
714:
712:
708:
707:
702:
698:
694:
692:
688:
683:
681:
677:
673:
670:
669:
665:
661:
657:
656:David Cameron
653:
651:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
628:
620:
618:
616:
612:
608:
607:
601:
597:
595:
591:
587:
583:
580:spoke in the
579:
575:
570:
568:
563:
555:
553:
551:
550:Sunday Herald
547:
543:
539:
535:
534:Sunday Herald
531:
530:Sunday Herald
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
506:
504:
500:
495:
494:Sunday Herald
491:
486:
482:
478:
477:
476:Sunday Herald
468:
467:
466:Sunday Herald
461:
454:
453:Sunday Herald
451:
449:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
430:San Francisco
426:
424:
420:
419:
414:
413:
408:
407:Peter Preston
404:
400:
396:
395:
390:
386:
382:
374:
370:
365:
358:
356:
354:
352:
351:
346:
342:
338:
334:
329:
326:
325:
320:
316:
311:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
279:
277:
273:
269:
265:
264:Imogen Thomas
261:
257:
252:
249:
245:
241:
237:
236:
232:According to
230:
228:
224:
222:
217:
216:
207:
205:
203:
199:
195:
190:
188:
184:
180:
179:gagging order
175:
173:
169:
168:
163:
159:
155:
151:
146:
144:
143:Imogen Thomas
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
119:
110:
107:
105:Judge sitting
103:
98:
95:
92:
88:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
64:
61:
57:
54:
51:
47:
43:
38:
33:
30:
27:UK legal case
19:
2303:
2296:
2289:
2282:
2275:
2268:
2261:
2150:
2109:
2073:. Retrieved
2066:
2057:
2045:. Retrieved
2038:
2013:. Retrieved
2006:
1996:
1984:. Retrieved
1980:the original
1973:
1963:
1951:. Retrieved
1944:
1932:
1920:. Retrieved
1913:
1903:
1884:
1872:. Retrieved
1865:
1856:
1844:. Retrieved
1837:
1828:
1816:. Retrieved
1809:
1800:
1788:. Retrieved
1783:The Guardian
1781:
1771:
1759:. Retrieved
1754:The Guardian
1752:
1745:Sabbagh, Dan
1739:
1726:
1714:. Retrieved
1707:
1698:
1686:. Retrieved
1679:
1670:
1658:. Retrieved
1653:The Guardian
1651:
1641:
1629:. Retrieved
1622:
1596:. Retrieved
1592:the original
1585:
1575:
1563:. Retrieved
1556:
1532:. Retrieved
1527:The Guardian
1525:
1515:
1503:. Retrieved
1496:
1487:
1479:
1472:
1460:. Retrieved
1453:
1443:
1431:. Retrieved
1424:
1414:
1402:. Retrieved
1397:The Guardian
1395:
1386:
1374:. Retrieved
1369:The Guardian
1367:
1357:
1345:. Retrieved
1338:
1328:
1316:. Retrieved
1309:
1299:
1291:the original
1286:Ars Technica
1284:
1274:
1262:. Retrieved
1255:
1246:
1234:. Retrieved
1227:
1218:
1206:. Retrieved
1199:
1190:
1178:. Retrieved
1173:The Guardian
1171:
1161:
1149:. Retrieved
1144:Daily Mirror
1142:
1132:
1120:. Retrieved
1113:
1104:
1092:. Retrieved
1087:The Guardian
1085:
1078:Sabbagh, Dan
1057:. Retrieved
1050:
1041:
1029:. Retrieved
1025:the original
1014:
1002:. Retrieved
998:the original
987:
979:the original
969:
959:
939:. Retrieved
932:
922:
910:. Retrieved
903:
893:
877:
873:
861:. Retrieved
850:
829:
789:
782:
768:of privacy.
750:
748:
740:
726:
717:Lord Wakeham
715:
704:
695:
687:John Hemming
684:
676:Alex Salmond
674:
666:
654:
624:
610:
604:
602:
598:
589:
578:John Hemming
571:
566:
561:
559:
549:
537:
533:
529:
507:
493:
474:
472:
464:
452:
427:
416:
412:The Guardian
410:
392:
384:
378:
355:
348:
344:
340:
333:Max Clifford
330:
322:
312:
280:
253:
233:
231:
219:
213:
211:
198:John Hemming
191:
187:social media
176:
165:
147:
133:, given the
117:
116:
115:
93:
85:Case history
80:EWHC 1232 QB
62:
29:
2225:Injunctions
2218:Terminology
1818:22 February
1790:15 December
711:free speech
701:Jimmy Wales
699:co-founder
446:court order
350:Big Brother
221:Big Brother
72:16 May 2011
2364:Categories
1477:Front page
1426:Wired News
1115:Sportsgrid
886:High Court
808:References
662:, said on
646:Lord Judge
526:High Court
514:injunction
485:Ryan Giggs
442:cyberspace
418:Spycatcher
381:Schillings
375:in the UK.
272:Ryan Giggs
208:Background
189:websites.
158:High Court
154:injunction
141:and model
131:Ryan Giggs
109:David Eady
2277:DFT v TFD
2244:See also
1734:, col 638
1730:Hansard,
802:Scots law
757:barrister
621:Reactions
584:and used
522:Edinburgh
516:) at the
510:interdict
337:publicist
315:blackmail
248:Guildford
135:pseudonym
2327:See also
2176:BBC News
2166:BBC News
2141:BBC News
2097:BBC News
2068:BBC News
1892:Archived
1839:BBC News
1811:BBC News
1709:Sky News
1624:BBC News
1558:BBC News
1498:Sky News
1229:BBC News
1201:Sky News
857:Archived
852:Sky News
772:See also
668:Daybreak
611:The Sun'
481:Scottish
353:babe'".
125:between
77:Citation
2131:YouTube
1846:2 March
743:Twitter
736:Twitter
606:The Sun
590:The Sun
567:The Sun
562:The Sun
505:laws."
503:privacy
490:Twitter
455:article
389:blogger
373:privacy
345:The Sun
341:The Sun
324:The Sun
292:privacy
270:player
256:Twitter
240:Twitter
215:The Sun
183:Twitter
167:The Sun
156:at the
129:player
69:Decided
2075:25 May
2047:25 May
2015:23 May
1986:23 May
1953:21 May
1922:21 May
1874:21 May
1761:23 May
1716:23 May
1688:23 May
1660:23 May
1631:23 May
1598:22 May
1565:22 May
1534:22 May
1505:22 May
1462:21 May
1433:21 May
1404:22 May
1376:1 June
1347:21 May
1340:Forbes
1318:21 May
1264:20 May
1236:22 May
1208:21 May
1180:23 May
1151:21 May
1122:20 May
1094:21 May
1059:18 May
1031:29 May
1004:29 May
941:23 May
912:21 May
863:24 May
678:, the
664:ITV1's
658:, the
648:, the
636:, the
544:, the
538:Herald
394:Forbes
294:, and
162:London
121:is an
1455:Metro
1429:. USA
1343:. USA
937:. USA
908:. USA
880:
369:tweet
200:used
49:Court
2077:2011
2049:2011
2043:. UK
2017:2011
2011:. UK
1988:2011
1955:2011
1949:. UK
1924:2011
1918:. UK
1876:2011
1848:2012
1820:2012
1792:2011
1786:. UK
1763:2011
1757:. UK
1718:2011
1690:2011
1662:2011
1656:. UK
1633:2011
1600:2011
1567:2011
1536:2011
1530:. UK
1507:2011
1464:2011
1458:. UK
1435:2011
1406:2011
1378:2011
1372:. UK
1349:2011
1320:2011
1266:2011
1238:2011
1210:2011
1182:2011
1176:. UK
1153:2011
1147:. UK
1124:2011
1096:2011
1090:. UK
1061:2011
1033:2011
1006:2011
943:2011
914:2011
905:Time
865:2015
766:tort
640:and
479:, a
463:The
391:for
387:. A
1867:BBC
1314:USA
1257:BBC
1052:BBC
934:CNN
749:In
520:in
448:."
244:BST
196:MP
181:on
160:in
2366::
2164:,
2139:,
2065:.
2037:.
2025:^
2005:.
1972:.
1943:.
1912:.
1864:.
1836:.
1808:.
1780:.
1751:.
1706:.
1678:.
1650:.
1621:.
1608:^
1584:.
1555:.
1544:^
1524:.
1495:.
1452:.
1423:.
1394:.
1366:.
1337:.
1308:.
1283:.
1254:.
1226:.
1198:.
1170:.
1141:.
1112:.
1084:.
1069:^
1049:.
951:^
931:.
902:.
849:.
838:^
815:^
761:QC
552:.
367:A
145:.
2205:e
2198:t
2191:v
2079:.
2051:.
2019:.
1990:.
1957:.
1926:.
1878:.
1850:.
1822:.
1794:.
1765:.
1720:.
1692:.
1664:.
1635:.
1602:.
1569:.
1538:.
1509:.
1466:.
1437:.
1408:.
1380:.
1351:.
1322:.
1268:.
1240:.
1212:.
1184:.
1155:.
1126:.
1098:.
1063:.
1035:.
1008:.
945:.
916:.
867:.
512:(
319:£
223:'
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
