73:
implies that the accuracy of a statement, fact, etc., has been verified. It is usually placed in a draft article by the writer, to the attention of the copy editor. The precise origin of the term is uncertain, but
151:
235:
46:
is used to indicate that an issue is no longer in question, often because a dispute (question) between two parties has been either
271:
104:
is a mark for internal use only, intended for removal prior to publishing. It should be distinguished from the unrelated mark
222:
47:
152:
http://www.brighthubeducation.com/learning-translating-latin/41739-translations-of-latin-legal-terms/
33:
209:
90:, first published in 1879. Alternative explanations of the origin include an abbreviation for
163:
243:
36:
and in some other contexts. The expression literally translates as 'the question falls'. In
29:
265:
83:
175:
62:
113:
96:, indicating that the issue is "no longer in question", and an abbreviation for
87:
223:
http://sues-news.com/2010/03/21/holy-chihuly-somebody-found-what-cq-means/
125:
112:, used in published pieces to indicate that a quote has been transcribed
188:
86:, a set of abbreviations used in the transmission of press reports via
134:, 'in which case; in particular'; primarily used in the Dutch language
37:
116:, without correction of perceived errors in the original source.
154:
Translating Latin Legal Terms: Animus
Nocendi and Cadit Quaestio
107:
164:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cadit%20quaestio
210:"Language Log: Hed, dek, lede, graf, tk: Live with it"
176:http://definitions.uslegal.com/c/cadit-quaestio/
8:
166:Merriam-Webster Dictionary - cadit quaestio
129:
105:
91:
41:
21:
178:USlegal.com - Definitions: cadit quaestio
78:was identified as the shorthand form of
144:
100:, which serves as a useful mnemonic.
7:
236:"Guidelines for Freelance Writers"
14:
189:"The Phillips Code (part 2 of 3)"
1:
32:expression that is used as a
288:
272:Latin legal terminology
130:
106:
92:
42:
22:
16:Latin legal expression
240:Los Angeles Times
98:correct as quoted
57:copy-editing mark
279:
256:
255:
253:
251:
246:on 11 April 2018
242:. Archived from
232:
226:
220:
214:
213:
206:
200:
199:
197:
195:
185:
179:
173:
167:
161:
155:
149:
133:
111:
95:
45:
25:
287:
286:
282:
281:
280:
278:
277:
276:
262:
261:
260:
259:
249:
247:
234:
233:
229:
221:
217:
208:
207:
203:
193:
191:
187:
186:
182:
174:
170:
162:
158:
150:
146:
141:
122:
59:
17:
12:
11:
5:
285:
283:
275:
274:
264:
263:
258:
257:
227:
215:
201:
180:
168:
156:
143:
142:
140:
137:
136:
135:
121:
118:
93:cadit quaestio
58:
52:
43:cadit quaestio
23:Cadit quaestio
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
284:
273:
270:
269:
267:
245:
241:
237:
231:
228:
224:
219:
216:
211:
205:
202:
190:
184:
181:
177:
172:
169:
165:
160:
157:
153:
148:
145:
138:
132:
128:, from Latin
127:
124:
123:
119:
117:
115:
110:
109:
103:
99:
94:
89:
85:
84:Phillips Code
81:
77:
72:
68:
64:
61:As a mark in
56:
53:
51:
49:
44:
39:
35:
31:
27:
26:
24:
248:. Retrieved
244:the original
239:
230:
218:
204:
192:. Retrieved
183:
171:
159:
147:
101:
97:
82:in the 1879
79:
75:
70:
66:
63:copy editing
60:
54:
50:or dropped.
20:
19:
18:
225:Sue's News
139:References
40:contexts,
34:legal term
88:telegraph
266:Category
250:11 April
194:11 April
131:casu quo
120:See also
114:verbatim
80:correct
48:settled
38:legal
30:Latin
28:is a
252:2018
196:2018
126:c.q.
71:c.q.
108:sic
69:or
268::
238:.
102:Cq
76:cq
67:cq
65:,
55:cq
254:.
212:.
198:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.