Knowledge (XXG)

Cambie Surgeries Corporation v British Columbia

Source ๐Ÿ“

116:
plaintiffs' favour would do long-lasting damage to Canada's public healthcare system that would far outweigh the problems it purported to solve. Both sides stated publicly that the outcome of the case would have an enduring effect on the country's healthcare. The trial started in 2016 and was finally decided on September 10, 2020. In an 880-page decision, Justice John J. Steeves of the BCSC dismissed the plaintiffs' claims. The plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal and in July 2022, the B.C. Court of Appeal upheld Justice Steeves' decision. The
108:-based private clinic Cambie Surgery Centre, challenged the sections of the province's Medicare Protection Act (MPA) that prevent private practitioners from charging patients who are enrolled in Canada's universal healthcare system for services available in that system. The lawsuit stated that the MPA was unconstitutional because it violated sections 7 ("right to life") and 15 ("equal protection") of the 217:. The third member of the panel, Justice Fenlon, held that the impugned legislative provisions deprive some patients of the right to life and security of the person, and are not in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice. Therefore, according to Justice Fenlon, the provisions infringe section 7 of the Charter. However, Justice Fenlon went on to find the provisions are saved by 185:, issued an 880-page ruling in favour of the defendants. Steeves found that the plaintiffs' complaints did not show violations of sections 7 and 15 of the Canadian Charter and that the amount of suffering the plaintiffs claimed to endure did not outweigh the deleterious effects a ruling in their favour would have on the country's universal healthcare system. 171:
who opposed the plaintiffs' claim. These groups, named by Steeves as "Patient Intervenors" and "Coalition Intervenors," were, respectively, a four-person group of non-expert citizens who said they "experienced harm while being treated by physicians engaging in dual practice and extra billing" and a
212:
and Justice Harris found that the impugned provisions of the Medicare Protection Act deprive some patients of the right to life and right to security of the person, but in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice. Therefore (according to the majority of the panel), the impugned
115:
Supporters of the lawsuit decried what they saw as a dangerous mandate that contributed to a problem of long waits for public care without consideration for urgency. The defendants' advocates argued that the lawsuit did not rise to the level of a constitutional question and that a ruling in
188:
Day and the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal in early 2021 and on July 15, 2022, the B.C. Court of Appeal upheld B.C. Supreme Court Justice John Steeves' decision that despite long waits in the public health system, there is no constitutional right to access to private health.
180:
The trial is known for its unusual length and complexity; it lasted just over four years and had participation from more than one hundred witnesses. It ended on September 10, 2020 when presiding justice John J. Steeves, a judge on the
151:, which guarantees "equality rights". The lawsuit claimed that this rule can cause people to "suffer prolonged pain and disability, serious psychological harm or deterioration and irreparable harm" that could have been prevented. 172:
four-person group made up of two low-income citizens whose medical needs are covered by the public system and two physicians who represented two advocacy groups that promote the preservation of universal healthcare in Canada.
143:, because it forbids private providers from directly charging patients enrolled in the public system for any service that can be accessed in that system and does not permit exceptions for urgency. They emphasized 148: 218: 214: 144: 128:
Brian Day, a "private health-care advocate", who founded and serves as the medical director of the private clinic Cambie Surgery Centre and Specialist Referral Clinic in
624: 388: 364: 687: 295: 761: 535: 140: 109: 224:
The Supreme Court of Canada declined to hear the case, dismissing the application for leave to appeal made by Cambie Surgeries Corporation.
751: 160: 459: 771: 766: 339: 182: 97: 32: 409: 756: 205: 208:, the three-judge panel ruled that the appeal be dismissed without costs but there were two opinions with different rationales. 704:
Canada's highest court will not hear an appeal from a Vancouver-based physician ... over the right to access private care.
638: 575: 600: 430: 201:
would make the case's final ruling. Immediately after Steeves handed down his ruling, Brian Day pledged to appeal it.
197:
A week before he issued his decision, Steeves predicted that no matter the outcome, inevitable appeals would mean the
164: 719: 319: 267: 688:"Decision ends Dr. Brian Day's 14-year legal battle to allow patients to go private if wait times are too long" 555: 198: 117: 234: 389:"B.C. Supreme Court rules against legalizing private health care following decade-long battle | CTV News" 722:(Report). 2020 BCSC 1310 Cambie Surgeries Corporation v. British Columbia (Attorney General). 2020-09-10 666: 104:, an advocate for private healthcare, against the province of British Columbia. Day, who runs the 168: 733: 270:. 2020 BCSC 1310 Cambie Surgeries Corporation v. British Columbia (Attorney General). 2020-09-10 618: 540: 509: 365:"B.C. Supreme Court rules against legalizing private health care following decade-long battle" 652: 209: 133: 639:"B.C. Supreme Court rules against private healthcare in landmark case | Globalnews.ca" 601:"Health care battle in judge's hands but expected to land in Canada's top court | CBC News" 139:
The plaintiffs argued that British Columbia's Medicare Protection Act (MPA) violated the
120:
declined to hear an appeal from the judgment of the British Columbia Court of Appeal.
745: 296:"Private Vancouver clinic loses constitutional challenge of public health-care rules" 653:"Cambie Surgeries Corporation v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2022 BCCA 245" 576:"B.C. Supreme Court rules against legalizing private healthcare in landmark case" 136:, was the spokesman for the high-profile case, sometimes called 'The Day Case'. 147:, which protects the "right to life, liberty and security of the person" and 129: 105: 101: 736:
Cambie Surgeries Corp. v. British Columbia (Medical Services Commission)
460:"B.C. Court of Appeal rules against doctor in private health care case" 484: 536:"B.C. trial over private health care could reshape Canadian medicare" 340:"Private health care battle draws to a close after a decade in B.C." 320:"Cambie Surgeries Corporation v. British Columbia โ€“ BC Injury Law" 24:
Cambie Surgeries Corporation v British Columbia (Attorney General)
556:"The Legal Attack on Public Health Care | BC Health Coalition" 599:
Feb 28, Camille Bains ยท The Canadian Press (2020-02-29).
268:"The Honourable Mr. Justice Steeves Reasons for Judgment" 219:
section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
215:
section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
16:
2020 high-profile Supreme Court of British Columbia case
720:
The Honourable Mr. Justice Steeves Reasons for Judgment
262: 260: 258: 256: 254: 252: 250: 510:"Backgrounder: Court challenges to one-tier medicare" 431:"For-Profit Clinic Lawsuit May Transform Health Care" 669:(Press release). Supreme Court of Canada. 2023-04-06 83: 78: 70: 62: 47: 39: 28: 23: 94:Cambie Surgeries Corporation v British Columbia 453: 451: 290: 288: 286: 284: 8: 623:: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list ( 221:, and therefore are not unconstitutional. 20: 655:. Court of Appeal for British Columbia. 246: 141:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 110:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 616: 7: 161:Attorney General of British Columbia 159:The lawsuit named as defendants the 14: 667:"Judgments in Leave Applications" 429:Macleod, Andrew (17 April 2014). 183:Supreme Court of British Columbia 98:Supreme Court of British Columbia 33:Supreme Court of British Columbia 762:Canadian constitutional case law 363:Weisgarber, Maria (2020-09-10). 206:British Columbia Court of Appeal 534:Fayerman, Pamela (2016-09-01). 96:was a high-profile, multi-year 1: 458:Woo, Andrea (July 15, 2022). 51:September 10, 2020 752:Privatization controversies 213:provisions do not infringe 788: 165:Attorney General of Canada 155:Defendants and intervenors 772:British Columbia case law 767:2020 in Canadian case law 516:. University of Manitoba 757:Privatization in Canada 410:"Cambie Case (ongoing)" 199:Supreme Court of Canada 118:Supreme Court of Canada 100:(BCSC) case brought by 87:Justice John J. Steeves 235:Chaoulli v Quebec (AG) 210:Chief Justice Bauman 167:, and two groups of 391:. 10 September 2020 514:EvidenceNetwork.ca 489:BC Medical Journal 464:The Globe and Mail 176:Trial and decision 541:The Vancouver Sun 485:"Editorial Board" 204:On appeal to the 91: 90: 43:September 6, 2016 779: 730: 728: 727: 707: 706: 701: 699: 684: 678: 677: 675: 674: 663: 657: 656: 649: 643: 642: 635: 629: 628: 622: 614: 612: 611: 596: 590: 589: 587: 586: 572: 566: 565: 563: 562: 552: 546: 545: 531: 525: 524: 522: 521: 505: 499: 498: 496: 495: 481: 475: 474: 472: 470: 455: 446: 445: 443: 441: 426: 420: 419: 417: 416: 406: 400: 399: 397: 396: 385: 379: 378: 376: 375: 369:British Columbia 360: 354: 353: 351: 350: 343:British Columbia 336: 330: 329: 327: 326: 316: 310: 309: 307: 306: 292: 279: 278: 276: 275: 264: 134:British Columbia 58: 56: 21: 787: 786: 782: 781: 780: 778: 777: 776: 742: 741: 725: 723: 718: 715: 710: 697: 695: 686: 685: 681: 672: 670: 665: 664: 660: 651: 650: 646: 637: 636: 632: 615: 609: 607: 598: 597: 593: 584: 582: 574: 573: 569: 560: 558: 554: 553: 549: 533: 532: 528: 519: 517: 507: 506: 502: 493: 491: 483: 482: 478: 468: 466: 457: 456: 449: 439: 437: 428: 427: 423: 414: 412: 408: 407: 403: 394: 392: 387: 386: 382: 373: 371: 362: 361: 357: 348: 346: 338: 337: 333: 324: 322: 318: 317: 313: 304: 302: 294: 293: 282: 273: 271: 266: 265: 248: 244: 230: 195: 178: 157: 126: 54: 52: 17: 12: 11: 5: 785: 783: 775: 774: 769: 764: 759: 754: 744: 743: 740: 739: 734:2010 BCSC 396 731: 714: 713:External links 711: 709: 708: 694:. 6 April 2023 679: 658: 644: 630: 591: 567: 547: 526: 500: 476: 447: 421: 401: 380: 355: 331: 311: 280: 245: 243: 240: 239: 238: 229: 226: 194: 191: 177: 174: 156: 153: 125: 122: 89: 88: 85: 81: 80: 76: 75: 72: 68: 67: 66:2020 BCSC 1310 64: 60: 59: 49: 45: 44: 41: 37: 36: 30: 26: 25: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 784: 773: 770: 768: 765: 763: 760: 758: 755: 753: 750: 749: 747: 738: 737: 732: 721: 717: 716: 712: 705: 693: 689: 683: 680: 668: 662: 659: 654: 648: 645: 640: 634: 631: 626: 620: 606: 602: 595: 592: 581: 577: 571: 568: 557: 551: 548: 543: 542: 537: 530: 527: 515: 511: 508:Peden, Alex. 504: 501: 490: 486: 480: 477: 465: 461: 454: 452: 448: 436: 432: 425: 422: 411: 405: 402: 390: 384: 381: 370: 366: 359: 356: 344: 341: 335: 332: 321: 315: 312: 301: 297: 291: 289: 287: 285: 281: 269: 263: 261: 259: 257: 255: 253: 251: 247: 241: 237: 236: 232: 231: 227: 225: 222: 220: 216: 211: 207: 202: 200: 192: 190: 186: 184: 175: 173: 170: 166: 162: 154: 152: 150: 146: 142: 137: 135: 131: 123: 121: 119: 113: 111: 107: 103: 99: 95: 86: 82: 79:Case opinions 77: 73: 69: 65: 61: 50: 46: 42: 38: 34: 31: 27: 22: 19: 735: 724:. Retrieved 703: 696:. Retrieved 691: 682: 671:. Retrieved 661: 647: 633: 608:. Retrieved 604: 594: 583:. Retrieved 579: 570: 559:. Retrieved 550: 539: 529: 518:. Retrieved 513: 503: 492:. Retrieved 488: 479: 467:. Retrieved 463: 438:. Retrieved 434: 424: 413:. Retrieved 404: 393:. Retrieved 383: 372:. Retrieved 368: 358: 347:. Retrieved 345:. 2020-02-28 342: 334: 323:. Retrieved 314: 303:. Retrieved 299: 272:. Retrieved 233: 223: 203: 196: 187: 179: 158: 138: 127: 114: 93: 92: 18: 580:Global News 169:intervenors 84:Decision by 746:Categories 726:2020-09-11 673:2023-04-06 610:2020-09-10 585:2020-09-10 561:2020-09-10 520:2016-09-02 494:2016-09-02 435:TheTyee.ca 415:2020-09-10 395:2020-09-10 374:2020-09-10 349:2020-09-10 325:2020-09-10 305:2020-09-10 274:2020-09-11 242:References 149:section 15 124:Plaintiffs 71:Transcript 55:2020-09-10 145:section 7 130:Vancouver 106:Vancouver 102:Brian Day 74:Judgement 692:CBC News 619:cite web 469:July 15, 440:22 April 300:CBC News 228:See also 63:Citation 698:6 April 53: ( 48:Decided 40:Started 193:Appeal 163:, the 35:(BCSC) 29:Court 700:2023 625:link 471:2022 442:2014 605:CBC 748:: 702:. 690:. 621:}} 617:{{ 603:. 578:. 538:. 512:. 487:. 462:. 450:^ 433:. 367:. 298:. 283:^ 249:^ 132:, 112:. 729:. 676:. 641:. 627:) 613:. 588:. 564:. 544:. 523:. 497:. 473:. 444:. 418:. 398:. 377:. 352:. 328:. 308:. 277:. 57:)

Index

Supreme Court of British Columbia
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Brian Day
Vancouver
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Supreme Court of Canada
Vancouver
British Columbia
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
section 7
section 15
Attorney General of British Columbia
Attorney General of Canada
intervenors
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Supreme Court of Canada
British Columbia Court of Appeal
Chief Justice Bauman
section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Chaoulli v Quebec (AG)







"The Honourable Mr. Justice Steeves Reasons for Judgment"

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘