Knowledge (XXG)

Caminetti v. United States

Source 📝

607: 31: 308:". This is a form of legislative interpretation that focuses strongly on the literal text of a statute. In its most extreme form the plain meaning rule does not look outside of the statutory text at any additional sources to find the legislative intent if the rule is "plain" from the text. Critics of using the plain meaning rule argue that a court may find or not find an ambiguity in a statute depending on the result that a court sees fit. 536: 365: 311:
The issue in the case that caused the Court to interpret using the plain meaning rule was whether the Mann Act's inclusion of the phrase "...or for any other immoral purpose..." included Caminetti's actions. The Court found that Caminetti had been convicted of transporting a woman across state lines
697: 140:
The Mann Act applied not only to purposes of prostitution but also to other noncommercial consensual sexual liaisons. Thus, consensual extramarital sex falls within the genre of "immoral practice."
692: 672: 551: 340: 321: 123: 107: 75: 382: 702: 667: 540: 677: 648: 429: 401: 614: 274: 259: 35: 479: 448: 304:
The case has an historic place in American jurisprudence in that it was one of the first where the court embraced the idea of the "
408: 335: 386: 415: 397: 490: 312:
for an immoral purpose which, according to the majority opinion, was well within the plain meaning of the statute.
375: 641: 171: 606: 247:
White-Slave Traffic (Mann) Act, ch. 395, 36 Stat. 825 (1910) (codified as amended at 18 U.S.C. §§ 2421-2424).
327: 589: 195: 687: 555: 422: 344: 278: 155: 127: 111: 67: 634: 571: 499: 183: 516: 305: 207: 682: 475: 54: 618: 474:. Studies in Twentieth Century American History. Vol. 1. Lewiston, NY: E. Mellen Press. 562: 508: 293: 580: 347: 290: 199: 175: 163: 661: 187: 286: 70: 469: 364: 535: 57:
v. United States; Maury I. Diggs v. United States; L.T. Hays v. United States
282: 491:"Prosecution of Mormon "Fundamentalists" under the Mann Act—Doctrine of 520: 285:. The Court decided that the Mann Act applied not only to purposes of 237:
McReynolds took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
82: 512: 471:
The Diggs–Caminetti case, 1913–1917: For Any Other Immoral Purpose
289:
but also to other noncommercial consensual sexual liaisons. Thus,
262:, Pub. L. No. 99-628, § 5(b)(1), 100 Stat. 3510–11 (in part) 30: 358: 622: 322:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 242
224:
Day, joined by Holmes, Van Devanter, Pitney, Brandeis
698:
United States Supreme Court cases of the White Court
507:(6). The Michigan Law Review Association: 785–787. 389:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 241: 228: 220: 215: 144: 134: 95: 90: 62: 49: 42: 23: 260:Child Sexual Abuse & Pornography Act of 1986 693:Abrogated United States Supreme Court decisions 673:United States statutory interpretation case law 296:falls within the definition of "immoral sex." 642: 8: 649: 635: 20: 449:Learn how and when to remove this message 336:Athanasaw & Sampson v. United States 18:1917 United States Supreme Court case 7: 603: 601: 387:adding citations to reliable sources 621:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by 615:Supreme Court of the United States 36:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 703:United States Supreme Court stubs 668:United States Supreme Court cases 558:470 (1917) is available from: 605: 534: 363: 232:McKenna, joined by White, Clarke 29: 374:needs additional citations for 678:1917 in United States case law 1: 273:, 242 U.S. 470 (1917), was a 613:This article related to the 468:Anderson, Robert L. (1990). 398:"Caminetti v. United States" 275:United States Supreme Court 43:Argued November 13–14, 1916 719: 600: 548:Caminetti v. United States 541:Caminetti v. United States 493:Caminetti v. United States 270:Caminetti v. United States 24:Caminetti v. United States 258: 251: 246: 236: 149: 139: 118:, 231 F. 106 (8th Cir.), 102:, 220 F. 545 (9th Cir.), 28: 489:Huston, John A. (1947). 45:Decided January 15, 1917 328:United States v. Bitty 100:Diggs v. United States 279:Farley Drew Caminetti 116:Hays v. United States 383:improve this article 172:Oliver W. Holmes Jr. 590:Library of Congress 500:Michigan Law Review 196:James C. McReynolds 184:Willis Van Devanter 306:plain meaning rule 300:Plain meaning rule 160:Associate Justices 81:37 S. Ct. 192; 61 630: 629: 539:Works related to 459: 458: 451: 433: 266: 265: 55:F. Drew Caminetti 710: 651: 644: 637: 609: 602: 594: 588: 585: 579: 576: 570: 567: 561: 538: 524: 485: 454: 447: 443: 440: 434: 432: 391: 367: 359: 294:extramarital sex 145:Court membership 114:637 (1915). 33: 32: 21: 718: 717: 713: 712: 711: 709: 708: 707: 658: 657: 656: 655: 598: 592: 586: 583: 577: 574: 568: 565: 559: 531: 513:10.2307/1283936 488: 482: 467: 464: 462:Further reading 455: 444: 438: 435: 392: 390: 380: 368: 357: 318: 302: 277:case involving 254: 198: 186: 174: 156:Edward D. White 130:674 (1916). 86: 44: 38: 19: 12: 11: 5: 716: 714: 706: 705: 700: 695: 690: 685: 680: 675: 670: 660: 659: 654: 653: 646: 639: 631: 628: 627: 610: 596: 595: 572:Google Scholar 544: 530: 529:External links 527: 526: 525: 486: 480: 463: 460: 457: 456: 371: 369: 362: 356: 353: 352: 351: 332: 324: 317: 314: 301: 298: 264: 263: 256: 255: 252: 249: 248: 244: 243: 239: 238: 234: 233: 230: 226: 225: 222: 218: 217: 213: 212: 211: 210: 208:John H. Clarke 200:Louis Brandeis 176:William R. Day 164:Joseph McKenna 161: 158: 153: 147: 146: 142: 141: 137: 136: 132: 131: 97: 93: 92: 88: 87: 80: 64: 60: 59: 51: 50:Full case name 47: 46: 40: 39: 34: 26: 25: 17: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 715: 704: 701: 699: 696: 694: 691: 689: 686: 684: 681: 679: 676: 674: 671: 669: 666: 665: 663: 652: 647: 645: 640: 638: 633: 632: 626: 624: 620: 616: 611: 608: 604: 599: 591: 582: 573: 564: 557: 553: 549: 545: 543:at Wikisource 542: 537: 533: 532: 528: 522: 518: 514: 510: 506: 502: 501: 496: 494: 487: 483: 481:0-88946-320-4 477: 473: 472: 466: 465: 461: 453: 450: 442: 431: 428: 424: 421: 417: 414: 410: 407: 403: 400: –  399: 395: 394:Find sources: 388: 384: 378: 377: 372:This article 370: 366: 361: 360: 354: 349: 346: 342: 338: 337: 333: 330: 329: 325: 323: 320: 319: 315: 313: 309: 307: 299: 297: 295: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 272: 271: 261: 257: 250: 245: 240: 235: 231: 227: 223: 219: 216:Case opinions 214: 209: 205: 201: 197: 193: 189: 188:Mahlon Pitney 185: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 162: 159: 157: 154: 152:Chief Justice 151: 150: 148: 143: 138: 133: 129: 125: 121: 120:cert. granted 117: 113: 109: 105: 104:cert. granted 101: 98: 94: 89: 84: 78: 77: 72: 69: 65: 61: 58: 56: 52: 48: 41: 37: 27: 22: 16: 688:Sex case law 623:expanding it 612: 597: 547: 504: 498: 492: 470: 445: 436: 426: 419: 412: 405: 393: 381:Please help 376:verification 373: 334: 326: 310: 303: 287:prostitution 269: 268: 267: 253:Abrogated by 242:Laws applied 203: 191: 179: 167: 119: 115: 103: 99: 91:Case history 74: 53: 15: 350: (1913) 662:Categories 439:March 2024 409:newspapers 291:consensual 63:Citations 683:Mann Act 546:Text of 316:See also 283:Mann Act 281:and the 221:Majority 563:Findlaw 521:1283936 423:scholar 229:Dissent 135:Holding 593:  587:  584:  581:Justia 578:  575:  569:  566:  560:  519:  478:  425:  418:  411:  404:  396:  331:(1911) 206: 204:· 202:  194: 192:· 190:  182: 180:· 178:  170: 168:· 166:  83:L. Ed. 617:is a 554: 517:JSTOR 430:JSTOR 416:books 355:Notes 343: 126: 110: 96:Prior 619:stub 556:U.S. 476:ISBN 402:news 345:U.S. 128:U.S. 112:U.S. 76:more 68:U.S. 66:242 552:242 509:doi 385:by 348:326 341:227 124:241 108:238 85:442 71:470 664:: 550:, 515:. 505:45 503:. 497:. 339:, 122:, 106:, 650:e 643:t 636:v 625:. 523:. 511:: 495:" 484:. 452:) 446:( 441:) 437:( 427:· 420:· 413:· 406:· 379:. 79:) 73:(

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
F. Drew Caminetti
U.S.
470
more
L. Ed.
238
U.S.
241
U.S.
Edward D. White
Joseph McKenna
Oliver W. Holmes Jr.
William R. Day
Willis Van Devanter
Mahlon Pitney
James C. McReynolds
Louis Brandeis
John H. Clarke
Child Sexual Abuse & Pornography Act of 1986
United States Supreme Court
Farley Drew Caminetti
Mann Act
prostitution
consensual
extramarital sex
plain meaning rule
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 242
United States v. Bitty
Athanasaw & Sampson v. United States

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.