Knowledge (XXG)

Certiorari before judgment

Source πŸ“

1062: 1696: 1708: 1685: 42:
Certiorari before judgment is rarely granted. Supreme Court Rule 11 states that this procedure will be followed "only upon a showing that the case is of such imperative public importance as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice and to require immediate determination in this Court."
49:
The power to grant certiorari before judgment is provided by statute, which authorizes the Supreme Court to review "cases in the courts of appeals" by granting certiorari "before or after rendition of judgment or decree". A party to the case may petition to the Supreme Court "at any time before
455:(2020) (cert. granted June 28, 2019) is not included in this list because although the petition was for certiorari before judgment, the court of appeals decided the case before the Supreme Court granted the petition, so that certiorari was after judgment. 50:
judgment", after a court of appeals has docketed the case. Only cases in a United States court of appeals are eligible, not any other court. Any party can file the petition, regardless of which party originally prevailed in the district court.
1363: 1502: 1402: 451: 1397: 1616: 1542: 1537: 1532: 1527: 1522: 1517: 1512: 1507: 1051: 115:
The Supreme Court granted certiorari before judgment only three times between 1988 and 2004, and zero times from then until February 2019. Since 2019, the court has granted certiorari before judgment in more cases.
1368: 1390: 1373: 314: 1639: 1604: 1488: 1378: 1498: 1385: 1046: 1353: 1147: 1358: 46:
In some situations, the court has also granted certiorari before judgment so that it could review a case at the same time as a similar case that had already reached the court otherwise.
1041: 1070: 426: 1493: 1611: 1225: 1599: 1471: 85: 1644: 1733: 1013: 302: 1738: 1476: 1036: 1649: 482:
Lindgren, James; Marshall, William P. (1986). "The Supreme Court's Extraordinary Power to Grant Certiorari before Judgment in the Court of Appeals".
67: 1621: 1670: 1440: 1560: 61: 53:
Well-known cases in which the Supreme Court has granted certiorari before judgment and heard the case on an expedited basis have included
1348: 1197: 1134: 1098: 1022: 549: 532: 278: 170: 103: 97: 24: 1688: 386: 1006: 1568: 36: 362: 290: 230: 218: 1573: 32: 1634: 1435: 999: 689: 1578: 1445: 79: 703: 457: 507: 634: 254: 158: 91: 756: 980: 966: 952: 924: 910: 882: 868: 840: 826: 734: 717: 398: 350: 73: 938: 798: 770: 1655: 1455: 1450: 1430: 1420: 1187: 1103: 242: 206: 1700: 1481: 1281: 658: 134: 603: 266: 1662: 1425: 1115: 1583: 487: 338: 194: 146: 28: 1182: 896: 812: 784: 614: 374: 326: 854: 675: 1323: 1245: 1205: 1177: 1162: 1152: 420: 55: 654: 1251: 1239: 1215: 182: 1727: 1329: 1110: 1078: 991: 630: 431: 553: 536: 1317: 1311: 1305: 1293: 1275: 1210: 1172: 1157: 1139: 1707: 1626: 1299: 1269: 1263: 1257: 1167: 39:, for the purpose of expediting the proceedings and obtaining a final decision. 1712: 1287: 1086: 639: 1233: 31:
in which the Supreme Court is asked to immediately review the decision of a
737:
Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California
452:
Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California
662: 491: 461:(2013) (cert. granted December 7, 2012) is omitted for the same reason. 655:"Supreme Court Grants of Certiorari "Before Judgment": 1988*–Present" 885:
Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina
315:
Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina
995: 16:
US Supreme Court certiorari without a Court of Appeals decision
625: 623: 423:, the equivalent in England & Wales and in Ireland 427:
Procedures of the Supreme Court of the United States
1592: 1553: 1464: 1411: 1339: 1224: 1196: 1126: 1069: 1029: 604:
Order list: 586 U.S. ___, Friday, February 15, 2019
591: 730: 728: 86:Northern Pipeline Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. 120:Certiorari before judgment granted since 1988 1007: 35:, without an appeal having been decided by a 8: 1640:Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court 615:Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson, No. 21-463 1014: 1000: 992: 118: 68:Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer 1099:Cert. dismissed as improvidently granted 871:ZF Automotive US, Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd. 635:"The rise of certiorari before judgment" 303:ZF Automotive US, Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd. 1622:Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937 1579:Old Supreme Court Chamber, U.S. Capitol 500: 478:(BNA Books, 10th ed. 2013), section 2.4 443: 1441:Eighth and Ninth Circuits Act of 1837 653:Vladeck, Steve (December 12, 2022). 7: 900:, 595 U.S. ___, 142 S.Ct. 879 (2022) 816:, 592 U.S. ___, 141 S.Ct. 645 (2021) 788:, 592 U.S. ___, 141 S.Ct. 527 (2020) 858:, 595 U.S. ___, 142 S.Ct. 14 (2021) 786:High Plains Harvest Church v. Polis 773:Harvest Rock Church, Inc. v. Newsom 231:High Plains Harvest Church v. Polis 219:Harvest Rock Church, Inc. v. Newsom 1734:Supreme Court of the United States 1023:Supreme Court of the United States 720:Department of Commerce v. New York 582:(11th ed. 2019), Sec. 2.2, p. 2-12 171:Department of Commerce v. New York 98:Department of Commerce v. New York 25:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 1739:United States appellate procedure 1706: 1694: 1684: 1683: 1584:Old Senate Chamber, U.S. Capitol 1060: 969:Department of Education v. Brown 387:Department of Education v. Brown 1671:United States Solicitor General 1398:Justices who served in Congress 843:Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson 569:(11th ed. 2019), Sec. 6.1(b)(4) 508:2023 Rules of the Supreme Court 279:Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson 104:Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson 1600:Article III, U.S. Constitution 37:United States Court of Appeals 1: 1569:Royal Exchange, New York City 1451:Judicial Circuits Act of 1866 1617:Code of Conduct for Justices 592:Lindgren & Marshall 1986 33:United States District Court 1635:Impeachment of Samuel Chase 1574:Old City Hall, Philadelphia 1436:Seventh Circuit Act of 1807 1052:Nomination and confirmation 62:U.S. v. United Mine Workers 1755: 1058: 80:Dames & Moore v. Regan 21:certiorari before judgment 1679: 1446:Tenth Circuit Act of 1863 1403:Burial places of justices 522:(11th ed. 2019), Sec. 2.4 111:List of petitions granted 1701:United States portal 1645:Supreme Court in fiction 757:Docket for No. 18-1214, 484:The Supreme Court Review 458:United States v. Windsor 981:Docket for No. 23-726, 967:Docket for No. 22-535, 953:Docket for No. 22-506, 925:Docket for No. 21A222, 911:Docket for No. 21A814, 883:Docket for No. 21-707, 869:Docket for No. 21-401, 841:Docket for No. 21-463, 827:Docket for No. 20A120, 735:Docket for No. 18-587, 718:Docket for No. 18-966, 705:United States v. Fanfan 159:United States v. Fanfan 1561:Supreme Court Building 983:Moyle v. United States 941:United States v. Texas 939:Docket for No. 22-58, 856:United States v. Texas 814:United States v. Higgs 799:Docket for No. 20A95, 771:Docket for No. 20A94, 693:, 537 U.S. 1044 (2002) 679:, 501 U.S. 1246 (1991) 580:Supreme Court Practice 567:Supreme Court Practice 520:Supreme Court Practice 476:Supreme Court Practice 404:Idaho v. United States 399:Moyle v. United States 363:United States v. Texas 291:United States v. Texas 255:United States v. Higgs 27:, is a petition for a 1656:United States Reports 1605:original jurisdiction 1489:Reporter of Decisions 1456:Judiciary Act of 1869 1431:Judiciary Act of 1802 1426:Judiciary Act of 1801 1421:Judiciary Act of 1789 1188:Ketanji Brown Jackson 1104:Grant, vacate, remand 1094:Cert. before judgment 707:, 542 U.S. 956 (2004) 1482:Supreme Court Police 1047:Ideological leanings 927:Brnovich v. Isaacson 740:, consolidated with 633:(January 25, 2022), 351:Brnovich v. Isaacson 1650:Supreme Court leaks 1116:In-chambers opinion 474:S. Shapiro et al., 121: 1412:Statutes affecting 1354:Associate justices 1148:Associate justices 1042:Court demographics 913:Ardoin v. Robinson 801:Robinson v. Murphy 759:Ross v. California 746:McAleenan v. Vidal 691:Gratz v. Bollinger 339:Ardoin v. Robinson 243:Robinson v. Murphy 207:Ross v. California 195:McAleenan v. Vidal 147:Gratz v. Bollinger 119: 29:writ of certiorari 1721: 1720: 1340:Lists of justices 1183:Amy Coney Barrett 955:Biden v. Nebraska 898:Merrill v. Caster 412: 411: 375:Biden v. Nebraska 327:Merrill v. Caster 1746: 1711: 1710: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1687: 1686: 1663:Lawyers' Edition 1198:Retired justices 1064: 1063: 1016: 1009: 1002: 993: 986: 978: 972: 964: 958: 950: 944: 936: 930: 922: 916: 908: 902: 894: 888: 880: 874: 866: 860: 852: 846: 838: 832: 824: 818: 810: 804: 796: 790: 782: 776: 768: 762: 754: 748: 732: 723: 715: 709: 701: 695: 687: 681: 673: 667: 666: 650: 644: 643: 627: 618: 612: 606: 601: 595: 589: 583: 578:Shapiro et al., 576: 570: 565:Shapiro et al., 563: 557: 556: 546: 540: 539: 529: 523: 518:Shapiro et al., 516: 510: 505: 495: 462: 448: 122: 1754: 1753: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1717: 1705: 1695: 1693: 1689:Other countries 1675: 1588: 1549: 1460: 1413: 1407: 1386:All nominations 1341: 1335: 1324:Rehnquist Court 1246:Ellsworth Court 1220: 1206:Anthony Kennedy 1192: 1178:Brett Kavanaugh 1163:Sonia Sotomayor 1153:Clarence Thomas 1127:Current members 1122: 1065: 1061: 1056: 1025: 1020: 990: 989: 979: 975: 965: 961: 951: 947: 937: 933: 923: 919: 909: 905: 895: 891: 881: 877: 867: 863: 853: 849: 839: 835: 825: 821: 811: 807: 797: 793: 783: 779: 769: 765: 755: 751: 733: 726: 716: 712: 702: 698: 688: 684: 677:Clark v. Roemer 674: 670: 652: 651: 647: 629: 628: 621: 613: 609: 602: 598: 590: 586: 577: 573: 564: 560: 548: 547: 543: 531: 530: 526: 517: 513: 506: 502: 481: 471: 466: 465: 449: 445: 440: 421:Leapfrog appeal 417: 402: 135:Clark v. Roemer 113: 56:Ex parte Quirin 19:A petition for 17: 12: 11: 5: 1752: 1750: 1742: 1741: 1736: 1726: 1725: 1719: 1718: 1716: 1715: 1713:Law portal 1703: 1691: 1680: 1677: 1676: 1674: 1673: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1652: 1647: 1642: 1637: 1632: 1624: 1619: 1614: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1596: 1594: 1590: 1589: 1587: 1586: 1581: 1576: 1571: 1564: 1563: 1557: 1555: 1551: 1550: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1540: 1535: 1530: 1525: 1520: 1515: 1510: 1505: 1491: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1474: 1468: 1466: 1462: 1461: 1459: 1458: 1453: 1448: 1443: 1438: 1433: 1428: 1423: 1417: 1415: 1409: 1408: 1406: 1405: 1400: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1379:time in office 1376: 1371: 1366: 1356: 1351: 1349:Chief justices 1345: 1343: 1337: 1336: 1334: 1333: 1332:(2005–present) 1327: 1321: 1315: 1309: 1303: 1297: 1291: 1285: 1279: 1273: 1267: 1261: 1255: 1252:Marshall Court 1249: 1243: 1240:Rutledge Court 1237: 1230: 1228: 1222: 1221: 1219: 1218: 1216:Stephen Breyer 1213: 1208: 1202: 1200: 1194: 1193: 1191: 1190: 1185: 1180: 1175: 1170: 1165: 1160: 1155: 1143: 1142: 1130: 1128: 1124: 1123: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1101: 1096: 1084: 1075: 1073: 1067: 1066: 1059: 1057: 1055: 1054: 1049: 1044: 1039: 1037:Lists of cases 1033: 1031: 1027: 1026: 1021: 1019: 1018: 1011: 1004: 996: 988: 987: 973: 959: 945: 931: 917: 903: 889: 875: 861: 847: 833: 829:Gish v. Newsom 819: 805: 791: 777: 763: 749: 742:Trump v. NAACP 724: 710: 696: 682: 668: 661:) – via 645: 631:Vladeck, Steve 619: 607: 596: 584: 571: 558: 554:Β§ 2101(e) 541: 537:Β§ 1254(1) 524: 511: 499: 498: 497: 496: 479: 470: 467: 464: 463: 442: 441: 439: 436: 435: 434: 429: 424: 416: 413: 410: 409: 406: 394: 393: 390: 382: 381: 378: 370: 369: 368:July 21, 2022 366: 358: 357: 356:June 30, 2022 354: 346: 345: 344:June 28, 2022 342: 334: 333: 330: 322: 321: 318: 310: 309: 306: 298: 297: 294: 286: 285: 282: 274: 273: 270: 267:Gish v. Newsom 262: 261: 258: 250: 249: 246: 238: 237: 234: 226: 225: 222: 214: 213: 212:June 28, 2019 210: 202: 201: 200:June 28, 2019 198: 190: 189: 188:June 28, 2019 186: 183:Trump v. NAACP 178: 177: 174: 166: 165: 162: 154: 153: 150: 142: 141: 140:June 28, 1991 138: 130: 129: 126: 112: 109: 92:U.S. v. Booker 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1751: 1740: 1737: 1735: 1732: 1731: 1729: 1714: 1709: 1704: 1702: 1692: 1690: 1682: 1681: 1678: 1672: 1669: 1665: 1664: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1653: 1651: 1648: 1646: 1643: 1641: 1638: 1636: 1633: 1631: 1629: 1625: 1623: 1620: 1618: 1615: 1613: 1612:Camera policy 1610: 1606: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1598: 1597: 1595: 1591: 1585: 1582: 1580: 1577: 1575: 1572: 1570: 1566: 1565: 1562: 1559: 1558: 1556: 1552: 1544: 1541: 1539: 1536: 1534: 1531: 1529: 1526: 1524: 1521: 1519: 1516: 1514: 1511: 1509: 1506: 1504: 1503:Chief Justice 1500: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1492: 1490: 1487: 1483: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1475: 1473: 1470: 1469: 1467: 1465:Functionaries 1463: 1457: 1454: 1452: 1449: 1447: 1444: 1442: 1439: 1437: 1434: 1432: 1429: 1427: 1424: 1422: 1419: 1418: 1416: 1410: 1404: 1401: 1399: 1396: 1392: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1384: 1380: 1377: 1375: 1372: 1370: 1367: 1365: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1357: 1355: 1352: 1350: 1347: 1346: 1344: 1338: 1331: 1330:Roberts Court 1328: 1325: 1322: 1319: 1316: 1313: 1310: 1307: 1304: 1301: 1298: 1295: 1292: 1289: 1286: 1283: 1280: 1277: 1274: 1271: 1268: 1265: 1262: 1259: 1256: 1253: 1250: 1247: 1244: 1241: 1238: 1235: 1232: 1231: 1229: 1227: 1223: 1217: 1214: 1212: 1209: 1207: 1204: 1203: 1201: 1199: 1195: 1189: 1186: 1184: 1181: 1179: 1176: 1174: 1171: 1169: 1166: 1164: 1161: 1159: 1156: 1154: 1151: 1149: 1145: 1144: 1141: 1138: 1136: 1135:Chief justice 1132: 1131: 1129: 1125: 1117: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111:Shadow docket 1109: 1105: 1102: 1100: 1097: 1095: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1085: 1083: 1081: 1080:Amicus curiae 1077: 1076: 1074: 1072: 1068: 1053: 1050: 1048: 1045: 1043: 1040: 1038: 1035: 1034: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1017: 1012: 1010: 1005: 1003: 998: 997: 994: 985: 984: 977: 974: 971: 970: 963: 960: 957: 956: 949: 946: 943: 942: 935: 932: 929: 928: 921: 918: 915: 914: 907: 904: 901: 899: 893: 890: 887: 886: 879: 876: 873: 872: 865: 862: 859: 857: 851: 848: 845: 844: 837: 834: 831: 830: 823: 820: 817: 815: 809: 806: 803: 802: 795: 792: 789: 787: 781: 778: 775: 774: 767: 764: 761: 760: 753: 750: 747: 743: 739: 738: 731: 729: 725: 722: 721: 714: 711: 708: 706: 700: 697: 694: 692: 686: 683: 680: 678: 672: 669: 664: 660: 656: 649: 646: 642: 641: 636: 632: 626: 624: 620: 616: 611: 608: 605: 600: 597: 594:, p. 263 593: 588: 585: 581: 575: 572: 568: 562: 559: 555: 551: 545: 542: 538: 534: 528: 525: 521: 515: 512: 509: 504: 501: 493: 489: 485: 480: 477: 473: 472: 468: 460: 459: 454: 453: 447: 444: 437: 433: 432:Shadow docket 430: 428: 425: 422: 419: 418: 414: 407: 405: 401: 400: 396: 395: 392:Dec 12, 2022 391: 389: 388: 384: 383: 379: 377: 376: 372: 371: 367: 365: 364: 360: 359: 355: 353: 352: 348: 347: 343: 341: 340: 336: 335: 331: 329: 328: 324: 323: 320:Jan 24, 2022 319: 317: 316: 312: 311: 308:Dec 10, 2021 307: 305: 304: 300: 299: 296:Oct 22, 2021 295: 293: 292: 288: 287: 284:Oct 22, 2021 283: 281: 280: 276: 275: 271: 269: 268: 264: 263: 260:Jan 15, 2021 259: 257: 256: 252: 251: 248:Dec 15, 2020 247: 245: 244: 240: 239: 236:Dec 15, 2020 235: 233: 232: 228: 227: 223: 221: 220: 216: 215: 211: 209: 208: 204: 203: 199: 197: 196: 192: 191: 187: 185: 184: 180: 179: 176:Feb 15, 2019 175: 173: 172: 168: 167: 163: 161: 160: 156: 155: 151: 149: 148: 144: 143: 139: 137: 136: 132: 131: 128:Date granted 127: 124: 123: 117: 110: 108: 106: 105: 100: 99: 94: 93: 88: 87: 82: 81: 76: 75: 74:U.S. v. Nixon 70: 69: 64: 63: 58: 57: 51: 47: 44: 40: 38: 34: 30: 26: 22: 1661: 1654: 1627: 1391:unsuccessful 1359:All justices 1342:and nominees 1318:Burger Court 1312:Warren Court 1306:Vinson Court 1294:Hughes Court 1276:Fuller Court 1211:David Souter 1173:Neil Gorsuch 1158:Samuel Alito 1146: 1140:John Roberts 1133: 1093: 1087: 1079: 982: 976: 968: 962: 954: 948: 940: 934: 926: 920: 912: 906: 897: 892: 884: 878: 870: 864: 855: 850: 842: 836: 828: 822: 813: 808: 800: 794: 785: 780: 772: 766: 758: 752: 745: 741: 736: 719: 713: 704: 699: 690: 685: 676: 671: 648: 638: 610: 599: 587: 579: 574: 566: 561: 544: 527: 519: 514: 503: 483: 475: 456: 450: 446: 408:Jan 5, 2024 403: 397: 385: 380:Dec 1, 2022 373: 361: 349: 337: 332:Feb 7, 2022 325: 313: 301: 289: 277: 272:Feb 8, 2021 265: 253: 241: 229: 224:Dec 3, 2020 217: 205: 193: 181: 169: 164:Aug 2, 2004 157: 152:Dec 2, 2002 145: 133: 114: 102: 101:(2019), and 96: 90: 84: 78: 72: 66: 60: 54: 52: 48: 45: 41: 20: 18: 1326:(1986–2005) 1320:(1969–1986) 1314:(1953–1969) 1308:(1946–1953) 1302:(1941–1946) 1300:Stone Court 1296:(1930–1941) 1290:(1921–1930) 1284:(1910–1921) 1282:White Court 1278:(1888–1910) 1272:(1874–1888) 1270:Waite Court 1266:(1864–1873) 1264:Chase Court 1260:(1836–1864) 1258:Taney Court 1254:(1801–1835) 1248:(1796–1800) 1236:(1789–1795) 1168:Elena Kagan 486:: 259–316. 1728:Categories 1414:court size 1288:Taft Court 1088:Certiorari 1071:Procedures 640:SCOTUSblog 469:References 1494:Law clerk 1369:education 1234:Jay Court 1030:The court 550:28 U.S.C. 533:28 U.S.C. 59:(1942), 23:, in the 1567:Former: 1554:Location 415:See also 107:(2021). 95:(2005), 89:(1982), 83:(1981), 77:(1974), 71:(1952), 65:(1947), 1628:Lochner 1593:Related 1543:Seat 10 1477:Marshal 1226:History 663:Twitter 492:3109524 1538:Seat 9 1533:Seat 8 1528:Seat 6 1523:Seat 4 1518:Seat 3 1513:Seat 2 1508:Seat 1 1242:(1795) 552:  535:  490:  1499:lists 1472:Clerk 1364:court 1082:brief 659:Tweet 488:JSTOR 438:Notes 125:Case 1374:seat 744:and 1630:era 1730:: 1501:: 727:^ 637:, 622:^ 1150:: 1137:: 1015:e 1008:t 1001:v 665:. 657:( 617:. 494:.

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
writ of certiorari
United States District Court
United States Court of Appeals
Ex parte Quirin
U.S. v. United Mine Workers
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
U.S. v. Nixon
Dames & Moore v. Regan
Northern Pipeline Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.
U.S. v. Booker
Department of Commerce v. New York
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson
Clark v. Roemer
Gratz v. Bollinger
United States v. Fanfan
Department of Commerce v. New York
Trump v. NAACP
McAleenan v. Vidal
Ross v. California
Harvest Rock Church, Inc. v. Newsom
High Plains Harvest Church v. Polis
Robinson v. Murphy
United States v. Higgs
Gish v. Newsom
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson
United States v. Texas
ZF Automotive US, Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd.
Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina
Merrill v. Caster

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑