404:
31:
315:
235:
appealed the case, the U.S. Supreme Court found that the rates were set without due process of law, specifically without an opportunity to challenge the equality and reasonableness of the charges. The
Minnesota court had sanctioned rate-setting without any judicial hearing, requirement of notice or
239:
The court rejected the railroad's argument that the state's contract with the
Minnesota railroad line, as it existed in prior state-chartered companies that the railroad later bought, remained in force against state law. Instead, they found that the state's right to regulate industry could not be
319:
474:
249:
and other railroad cases that left states to decide toll rates. He indicated that it was the province of the states to decide the policy question of railroad rates, and not that of the judiciary.
499:
330:
281:
258:
79:
232:
54:
489:
504:
469:
484:
464:
445:
240:
forfeited except by an explicit declaration in law. However, this issue was subsumed by the court's broader decision regarding due process.
479:
167:
411:
220:
35:
227:
limits state regulatory power over railroad rates. A regulatory agency in
Minnesota had set railroad rates that the
494:
438:
403:
350:
228:
386:
334:
285:
139:
131:
71:
431:
151:
368:
175:
377:
163:
143:
359:
245:
123:
341:
415:
288:
458:
243:
Justice
Bradley dissented from the decision, arguing that it practically overturned
74:
224:
155:
105:
314:
236:
witnesses, "-in fact, nothing which has the semblance of due process of law".
90:
58:
86:
30:
216:
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul
Railway Company v. Minnesota
24:
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul
Railway Company v. Minnesota
327:
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul
Railway Co. v. Minnesota
320:
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul
Railway Co. v. Minnesota
278:
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul
Railway Co. v. Minnesota
419:
475:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Fuller Court
259:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 134
204:
196:
192:
Blatchford, joined by Fuller, Field, Harlan, Brewer
188:
183:
112:
98:
66:
49:
42:
23:
500:Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad
233:Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad
55:Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad
219:, 134 U.S. 418 (1890), was a case in which the
439:
8:
446:
432:
20:
61:ex rel. Railroad and Warehouse Commission
270:
490:United States administrative case law
18:1890 United States Supreme Court case
7:
400:
398:
108:applies to state regulatory action.
412:Supreme Court of the United States
231:had refused to overturn. When the
221:Supreme Court of the United States
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
505:United States Supreme Court stubs
470:United States Supreme Court cases
337:418 (1890) is available from:
485:Rail transportation in Minnesota
402:
313:
29:
465:1890 in United States case law
208:Bradley, joined by Gray, Lamar
1:
418:. You can help Knowledge by
410:This article related to the
521:
480:Legal history of Minnesota
397:
43:Argued January 13–14, 1890
117:
103:
28:
229:Minnesota Supreme Court
45:Decided March 24, 1890
223:held that procedural
168:Lucius Q. C. Lamar II
57:Company v. State of
387:Library of Congress
128:Associate Justices
85:10 S. Ct. 462; 33
495:1890 in Minnesota
427:
426:
318:Works related to
212:
211:
164:Samuel Blatchford
144:Joseph P. Bradley
512:
448:
441:
434:
406:
399:
391:
385:
382:
376:
373:
367:
364:
358:
355:
349:
346:
340:
317:
301:
300:134 U.S. at 457.
298:
292:
275:
246:Munn v. Illinois
140:Stephen J. Field
132:Samuel F. Miller
113:Court membership
33:
32:
21:
520:
519:
515:
514:
513:
511:
510:
509:
455:
454:
453:
452:
395:
389:
383:
380:
374:
371:
365:
362:
356:
353:
347:
344:
338:
310:
305:
304:
299:
295:
276:
272:
267:
255:
176:David J. Brewer
166:
154:
142:
124:Melville Fuller
94:
44:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
518:
516:
508:
507:
502:
497:
492:
487:
482:
477:
472:
467:
457:
456:
451:
450:
443:
436:
428:
425:
424:
407:
393:
392:
369:Google Scholar
323:
309:
308:External links
306:
303:
302:
293:
269:
268:
266:
263:
262:
261:
254:
251:
210:
209:
206:
202:
201:
198:
194:
193:
190:
186:
185:
181:
180:
179:
178:
152:John M. Harlan
129:
126:
121:
115:
114:
110:
109:
101:
100:
96:
95:
84:
68:
64:
63:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
517:
506:
503:
501:
498:
496:
493:
491:
488:
486:
483:
481:
478:
476:
473:
471:
468:
466:
463:
462:
460:
449:
444:
442:
437:
435:
430:
429:
423:
421:
417:
413:
408:
405:
401:
396:
388:
379:
370:
361:
352:
351:CourtListener
343:
336:
332:
328:
324:
322:at Wikisource
321:
316:
312:
311:
307:
297:
294:
290:
287:
283:
279:
274:
271:
264:
260:
257:
256:
252:
250:
248:
247:
241:
237:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
217:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
184:Case opinions
182:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
130:
127:
125:
122:
120:Chief Justice
119:
118:
116:
111:
107:
102:
97:
92:
88:
82:
81:
76:
73:
69:
65:
62:
60:
56:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
420:expanding it
409:
394:
326:
296:
291: (1890).
277:
273:
244:
242:
238:
215:
214:
213:
171:
159:
147:
135:
78:
53:
15:
225:due process
197:Concurrence
156:Horace Gray
106:due process
104:Procedural
459:Categories
265:References
91:U.S. LEXIS
89:970; 1890
67:Citations
59:Minnesota
325:Text of
253:See also
189:Majority
360:Findlaw
342:Cornell
205:Dissent
99:Holding
390:
384:
381:
378:Justia
375:
372:
366:
363:
357:
354:
348:
345:
339:
280:,
200:Miller
174:
172:·
170:
162:
160:·
158:
150:
148:·
146:
138:
136:·
134:
87:L. Ed.
414:is a
333:
284:
416:stub
335:U.S.
286:U.S.
93:1984
80:more
72:U.S.
70:134
331:134
289:418
282:134
75:418
461::
329:,
447:e
440:t
433:v
422:.
83:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
