Knowledge

United States v. Morrison

Source đź“ť

1129:"Try the common sense test: When you think of a rape in a college dormitory, do you think about interstate commerce? As the Fourth Circuit noted in Brzonkala, the relationship between sexual violence and interstate commerce is rather attenuated.... Do you want Congress to enjoy unrestricted regulatory power over you? (Do you want your divorce in federal court? Do you want Congress making local zoning decisions for your town?) The Supreme Court in Lopez rightly held that the Commerce Clause is not a grant of general police power.... This standard does not unduly limit congressional power, including the power to prohibit discrimination. It does not invalidate the Civil Rights Act of 1964: Segregation in hotels and restaurants, on transportation systems, and in the workplace involved commercial activities with clear and substantial effects upon interstate commerce." 380:, freshman student, Christy Brzonkala, alleged that she was assaulted and raped repeatedly by students Antonio Morrison and James Crawford. Brzonkala initially stated that she visited Morrison and Crawford in their dormitory and they assaulted her, but later claimed that she was assaulted in her dormitory, and had never met the students until that day. During the school-conducted hearing on her complaint, Morrison admitted having sexual contact with her, but claimed that it was consensual. College proceedings failed to punish Crawford who produced an alibi witness, but initially punished Morrison with a suspension (which was later struck down by the administration). A state 600:
agreed with the government that there was a "voluminous congressional record" supporting the "assertion that there is pervasive bias in various state justice systems against victims of gender-motivated violence." The Court also agreed with the government that "state-sponsored gender discrimination violates equal protection unless it serves important governmental objectives...." However, according to the majority, even if there is unconstitutional state action, Congress is justified in targeting only state actors, rather than private parties.
42: 550:"insufficient investigation and prosecution of gender-motivated crime, inappropriate focus on the behavior and credibility of the victims of that crime, and unacceptably lenient punishments for those who are actually convicted of gender-motivated violence." That bias, the government argued, deprived women of the equal protection of the laws, and the private civil remedy of VAWA was meant to redress "both the States' bias and deter future instances of gender discrimination in the state courts." 5260: 504:, the Court stated, "Were the Federal Government to take over the regulation of entire areas of traditional State concern, areas having nothing to do with the regulation of commercial activities, the boundaries between the spheres of federal and State authority would blur." The majority further stated that "it is difficult to perceive any limitation on federal power, even in areas such as criminal law enforcement or education where States historically have been sovereign." 688:
and Ginsburg, argued that it was primarily the responsibility of Congress, not the courts, to put limits on Congress's power under the Commerce Clause. Joined by Justice Stevens, Justice Breyer contended that Congress had been sensitive to concerns of federalism in enacting VAWA, and he expressed doubts about the majority's pronouncements on the Fourteenth Amendment. According to the four dissenting justices, the
1204: 1081: 687:
Justice Souter, joined by Justices Stevens, Ginsburg, and Breyer, argued that enacting VAWA was well within Congress's power under the Commerce Clause and stated that the majority revived an old and discredited interpretation of the Commerce Clause. Justice Breyer, joined by Justices Stevens, Souter,
599:
stated that "assuming that there has been gender-based disparate treatment by state authorities in this case, it would not be enough to save § 13981's civil remedy, which is directed not at a State or state actor but at individuals who have committed criminal acts motivated by gender bias." The Court
341:
held that the Commerce Clause gave Congress only the power to regulate activities that were directly economic in nature, even if there were indirect economic consequences. Rehnquist also held that the Equal Protection Clause did not authorize the law because the clause applies only to acts by states,
557:
limit the manner in which Congress may remedy discrimination, and they require a civil remedy to be directed at a state or a state actor, not a private party. The Court stated that such precedents prohibit only action by state governments, not private conduct. In other words, the unequal enforcement
645:
did not allow Congress to exceed the Court's interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Although it had been widely believed that Section Five of the Fourteenth Amendment was a "one-way ratchet" and a minimum standard, the Court's interpretation of the Equal Protection Clause, that interpretation
755:
agreed with the courts that Congress had overstepped its bounds by invoking the Commerce Clause: "The price of upholding VAWA's civil rights remedy is an unconstitutional grant of unlimited power to Congress, power that will not always be used wisely or with regard to individual rights. We need to
478:
The majority concluded that acts of violence that were meant to be remedied by VAWA had only an "attenuated," not a substantial, effect on interstate commerce. The government, however, argued that "a mountain of evidence" indicated that such acts in the aggregate had a substantial effect. For that
524:
must be considered in the light of our dual system of government and may not be extended so as to embrace effects upon interstate commerce so indirect and remote that to embrace them, in view of our complex society, would effectually obliterate the distinction between what is national and what is
470:
court stated that Congress may regulate the use of the channels of interstate commerce, the "instrumentalities" (such as vehicles) used in interstate commerce, and activities that substantially affect interstate commerce. Because VAWA's civil remedy concededly did not regulate the first or second
772:
said that the attorneys general of 36 states had endorsed the VAWA, and he argued that the endorsement "exposes one of the more bizarre aspects of the Supreme Court's recent activism on behalf of state sovereignty: From the states' point of view, this campaign is often pointless and sometimes
549:
The U.S. government argued that VAWA appropriately enforced the Equal Protection Clause's ban on governmental gender discrimination. Specially, the government argued that pervasive gender stereotypes and assumptions permeated state justice systems and that such forms of state bias led to
659:, 384 U.S. 641 (1966), in which the Court had called that Section Five of the Fourteenth Amendment "a positive grant of legislative power authorizing Congress to exercise its discretion in determining the need for and nature of legislation to secure Fourteenth Amendment guarantees." In 767:
for relying on "implicitly patriarchal" legal reasoning. She argued that the decision reflected an attitude, pervasive in the American judicial system, of violence against women being a "domestic" issue and therefore less serious than "male issues." Professor
619:
struck down: "There were state laws on the books bespeaking equality of treatment, but in the administration of these laws there was discrimination against newly freed slaves." To the majority, that quote indicated that the law deemed unconstitutional in the
5229: 169:
Congress did not regulate an activity that substantially affected interstate commerce. The Commerce Clause thus did not permit the enactment of the Act. The Fourteenth Amendment was not applicable since no state was responsible for causing the alleged
336:
The case arose from a challenge to a provision of the Violence Against Women Act that provided victims of gender-motivated violence the right to sue their attackers in federal court. In a majority opinion joined by four other justices, Chief Justice
696:"are not rips in the fabric of the Framers' Constitution, inviting judicial repairs," and amendments affecting states' rights like the Seventeenth Amendment "did not convert the judiciary into an alternate shield against the commerce power." 641:(1997), the majority stated, Congress was required to adhere to the Court's interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment, including the Court's interpretation of the state-action doctrine. The "congruence and proportionality" requirement of 4238: 3501: 2024: 2056: 3477: 593:, the Court ruled that the Clause did not apply to a prison lynching since the Fourteenth Amendment did not apply to private actors, only state actors. In that case, a sheriff, a state actor, had tried to prevent the lynching. 485:(1942), which held that Congress could regulate an individual act that lacked a substantial effect on interstate commerce if, when aggregated, such acts had the required relation to interstate commerce. Once again, relying on 1486: 3674: 516: 4078: 1019:'Power' and the Forced Reconsideration of Constitutional Decisions", 53 U. Chi. L. Rev. 819 (1986); William Cohen, "Congressional Power to Interpret Due Process and Equal Protection", 27 Stan L. Rev. 603 (1975). 5871: 4030: 2780: 5866: 388: 5219: 4246: 3541: 3411: 4390: 4358: 603:
The government's argument was that VAWA had been enacted in response to "gender-based disparate treatment by state authorities." In contrast there was "no indication of such state action" in the
4038: 496:
The Court explained that the need to distinguish between economic activities that directly and those that indirectly affect interstate commerce was caused by "the concern that we expressed in
5234: 719: 2195: 773:
counterproductive." Shane stated the 36 attorneys general had called the Violence Against Women Act "a particularly appropriate remedy for the harm caused by gender-motivated violence."
5856: 5224: 5214: 4046: 3642: 5199: 2475: 1757: 1068:, May 19, 2000: "Although the case started as a classic 'he said, she said,' by the time it reached the Supreme Court, U.S. v. Morrison was all about federalism, not sexual politics." 693: 5486: 5194: 4467: 3799: 3509: 2710: 689: 422: 316: 4118: 1824: 3762: 3602: 1928: 1219: 792: 392: 97: 5249: 5876: 5419: 4342: 3928: 3469: 2764: 2678: 2403: 2299: 2088: 1117: 802: 4254: 3965: 5816: 3974: 3824: 1984: 611:
held that the Fourteenth Amendment did not allow Congress to target private parties to remedy the unequal enforcement of state laws. To support that interpretation of the
5512: 5552: 5299: 4963: 4634: 4278: 4214: 3517: 4650: 4492: 4446: 3525: 2072: 1632: 5497: 4014: 458:, the Court had stressed "enumerated powers" that limit federal power to maintain "a distinction between what is truly national and what is truly local." Therefore, 5861: 4414: 4190: 3746: 3440: 3155: 3070: 2219: 1131: 1095: 508: 5685: 4422: 4126: 3912: 3832: 3357: 3216: 3078: 5038: 4793: 4671: 4598: 4591: 4318: 3840: 3682: 2508: 2347: 1665: 1572: 1519: 1450: 1446: 1397: 1393: 1344: 1340: 1326: 4907: 3349: 534:
The Court also held that Congress lacked the power to enact VAWA under the Fourteenth Amendment. It relied on the "state action" doctrine, which originated in
4476: 675:
had involved federal legislation "directed at New York officials," instead of private parties. The Court also noted that unlike the VAWA, the legislation in
5482: 373:
for a federal civil remedy to victims of gender-based violence even if no criminal charges had been filed against the alleged perpetrator of that violence.
3944: 3754: 3626: 3594: 3285: 2660: 2267: 462:
limited the scope of the Commerce Clause to exclude activity that was not directly economic in nature, even if there were indirect economic consequences.
2379: 1061: 5891: 5637: 5334: 5289: 5239: 4262: 2211: 2064: 5537: 3666: 3389: 2032: 1701: 500:
that Congress might use the Commerce Clause to completely obliterate the Constitution's distinction between national and local authority." Referring to
5607: 5204: 4022: 3920: 3163: 3147: 3139: 797: 558:
of state laws caused by inaction is, by that interpretation, beyond the scope of the federal government's enforcement of the Equal Protection Clause.
5507: 5532: 5284: 4334: 4054: 3808: 3200: 3046: 3038: 1960: 5886: 5274: 5154: 4350: 3341: 2966: 2096: 2016: 1709: 5502: 3730: 2251: 650:
to prevent what the Court described as "a considerable congressional intrusion into the States' traditional prerogatives and general authority."
577:, the Court had held that the Equal Protection Clause applied only to acts done by states, not to acts done by private individuals. Because the 5527: 4302: 3952: 3381: 2259: 1840: 5107: 4867: 4438: 4406: 4206: 4198: 3990: 3770: 3738: 3618: 3573: 3493: 2283: 2179: 1808: 751:: "The court got it right. If Congress could federalize rape and assault, it's hard to think of anything it couldn't." The lawyer and writer 493:
did not apply because economic effects of crimes against women were indirect and so they could not be addressed through the Commerce Clause.
3086: 5339: 5209: 3872: 3786: 3485: 3419: 3208: 3062: 3054: 2427: 2139: 1968: 1920: 1314: 553:
The Court responded that even if there had been gender-based disparate treatment by state authorities in that case, precedents such as the
5522: 5821: 5329: 4484: 4430: 3706: 3533: 3240: 3183: 2615: 1944: 5478: 5474: 5369: 5359: 4294: 3778: 3658: 3549: 2387: 2371: 1976: 1936: 1888: 1478: 1417: 1364: 1323: 787: 586: 366: 304: 46: 4947: 384:
did not find sufficient evidence to charge either man with a crime. Brzonkala then filed suit under the Violence Against Women Act.
5577: 5389: 4270: 4142: 3982: 3333: 3317: 3171: 2323: 2275: 2163: 2040: 713: 451: 5399: 5244: 5115: 4310: 4222: 3998: 3848: 1912: 1896: 1872: 111:
3422; 68 U.S.L.W. 4351; 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (Daily Journal DAR 5061; 2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2583; 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 287
5790: 5394: 4728: 3856: 3714: 3448: 1864: 1832: 1539: 413:(VAWA) of 1994 that gave victims of gender-motivated violence the right to sue their attackers in federal court. Chief Justice 2702: 5294: 4939: 2905: 2483: 1848: 1717: 2315: 436:
The majority opinion was that VAWA exceeded congressional power under the Commerce Clause and the Equal Protection Clause.
5730: 5660: 5612: 5547: 5542: 5517: 5379: 4931: 4843: 3431: 3224: 3130: 2603: 2080: 1592: 1135: 5806: 5409: 5344: 5017: 3690: 2694: 2331: 1880: 120: 5147: 4517: 4286: 3610: 3094: 2235: 2008: 1640: 1171: 1158:
Catharine A. MacKinnon, "Disputing Male Sovereignty: On United States v. Morrison", 114 Harv. L. Rev. 135 (2000–2001)
1208: 5680: 5627: 5622: 4915: 4570: 4062: 2451: 2000: 1904: 1816: 1661: 1182:(2000-05-21). Also see Mauro, Tony. "States' Rights Triumph in Supreme Court Kimel Decision, Oral VAWA Argument", 875:"VIRGINIA TECH SAYS WOMAN CHANGED STORY SCHOOL ASKS FOR DISMISSAL OF HER CIVIL SUIT AGAINST IT, MORRISON, CRAWFORD" 823:"VIRGINIA TECH SAYS WOMAN CHANGED STORY SCHOOL ASKS FOR DISMISSAL OF HER CIVIL SUIT AGAINST IT, MORRISON, CRAWFORD" 410: 362: 635:
was valid, the VAWA remained unconstitutionally aimed not at state actors but at private criminal conduct. Under
5449: 5059: 5051: 4562: 3904: 3309: 3256: 2411: 2307: 2243: 1693: 1028:
Justice Souter’s dissent, which was joined by Justice Stevens, Justice Ginsburg, and Justice Breyer, May 15, 2000
4923: 874: 822: 5736: 5582: 5309: 5304: 5279: 4851: 4744: 4696: 4454: 4086: 3880: 3650: 3232: 3192: 3110: 1584: 1307: 1286:
Yes, Virginia (Tech), Our Government Is One Of Limited Powers: United States v. Morrison, 120 S.Ct. 1740 (2000)
637: 578: 955: 142: 4955: 546:(1883), and provides that the prohibitions of the Fourteenth Amendment do not constrain private individuals. 5670: 4546: 4158: 3936: 3864: 3277: 3248: 1791: 1749: 1725: 1677: 1547: 1515: 563: 536: 320: 1266: 999: 977: 848: 157: 5881: 5785: 5763: 5140: 5091: 4883: 4374: 4174: 4094: 3373: 3293: 3118: 2958: 2740: 2443: 2419: 573:(1883), both of which were decided 15 years after the Fourteenth Amendment's ratification in 1868. In the 446: 358: 325: 201: 1239: 78: 5259: 5067: 4530: 3585: 3325: 3268: 2974: 2925: 2800: 2640: 2632: 2578: 2540: 2355: 2187: 1952: 1856: 1223: 908: 89: 74: 4875: 2363: 5132: 5592: 5492: 5439: 5429: 5178: 5099: 4996: 4538: 4398: 4134: 4110: 4070: 3030: 2897: 2748: 1741: 1531: 655: 561:
The majority reaffirmed the state action doctrine and specifically reaffirmed the results reached in
5314: 5083: 4816: 4760: 4736: 4006: 3014: 2998: 2982: 2833: 2732: 2339: 2203: 1409: 1300: 1248: 760: 743: 507:
Justice Thomas's concurring opinion also expressed the concern that "Congress appropriating State
229: 723:, was one of a series of Rehnquist Court decisions from 1999 through 2001 holding that Congress's 5780: 5675: 5632: 4806: 4720: 4712: 4642: 4230: 3698: 3301: 3102: 3006: 2990: 2873: 2865: 2772: 2756: 2522: 2291: 1733: 1613: 1568: 569: 542: 481: 300: 466:
was the first significant limitation on the Commerce Clause powers of Congress in 53 years. The
349:
argued that the majority revived an old and discredited interpretation of the Commerce Clause.
65:
United States v. Antonio J. Morrison et al. and Christy Brzonkala v. Antonio J. Morrison et al.
5009: 4859: 4618: 4554: 4102: 3896: 3816: 3565: 2934: 2913: 2809: 2686: 2587: 2467: 2227: 2048: 1800: 1372: 1111: 1047: 724: 414: 338: 193: 185: 5753: 5747: 5654: 5562: 4835: 4704: 4610: 4326: 4182: 4150: 3634: 2942: 2825: 2648: 2565: 2171: 2131: 2115: 1685: 1625: 1462: 391:
held that Congress lacked authority to enact 42 U.S.C. § 13981. A three-judge panel of the
5775: 5665: 5572: 5075: 4789: 4366: 4166: 3722: 2950: 2881: 2857: 2817: 2670: 2395: 2147: 2123: 1992: 1778: 1494: 1425: 1175: 782: 418: 330: 312: 225: 213: 1292: 444:
With regard to the Commerce Clause, the majority said that the result was controlled by
5718: 4971: 4899: 4752: 4688: 4382: 3365: 2849: 2841: 2788: 2595: 2435: 1470: 1257: 769: 624:
was meant to combat the same kind of disparate treatment against which VAWA was aimed.
237: 205: 1230: 1038: 5850: 5811: 5768: 5758: 5617: 5602: 5567: 5424: 5163: 4891: 4626: 3888: 3401: 3022: 2889: 2722: 2624: 1356: 752: 581:
applied to racial discrimination in private establishments, the Court decided in the
377: 5557: 5469: 5414: 5384: 4768: 3557: 370: 346: 217: 1285: 417:, writing for the majority, held that Congress lacked authority, under either the 92: 17: 5741: 2532: 912: 308: 5319: 3460: 2155: 1203: 732: 381: 108: 4239:
Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank
3502:
College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board
900: 615:, the Court quoted one of the Congressmen who had supported the law that the 5464: 5459: 5454: 5354: 5349: 104: 3478:
San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. United States Olympic Committee
2025:
Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Oregon
1186:(2000-01-12); Greenhouse, Linda. "Justices Cool to Law Protecting Women", 1168: 933: 679:"was directed only to the State where the evil found by Congress existed." 5724: 1487:
Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission
1003: 981: 959: 627:
The majority continued that even if the government's distinction between
288:
U.S. Const. Art. I, § 8, cl. 3; U.S. Const. Amend. XIV; 42 U.S.C. § 13981
146: 139: 2057:
United Haulers Ass'n v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority
5697: 5404: 1275: 653:
The belief that section five was a "one-way ratchet" had been based on
397: 307:
were unconstitutional because they exceeded the powers granted to the
4079:
Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp.
3675:
Quality King Distributors Inc., v. L'anza Research International Inc.
934:
Court to Congress: You can't regulate everything by Stuart Taylor Jr.
731:
was also seen by the press as one of the Rehnquist Court's series of
2380:
Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Association, Inc.
1126:(2000-02-14). Retrieved 2007-02-13. Kaminer's article also stated: 4031:
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.
2781:
Consolidated Safety-Valve Co. v. Crosby Steam Gauge & Valve Co.
389:
United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia
5712: 5707: 5702: 5374: 5364: 5324: 333:
cases that limited Congress's powers under the Commerce Clause.
154: 5136: 5036: 4994: 4787: 4669: 4589: 4515: 4247:
J. E. M. Ag Supply, Inc. v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.
2563: 2506: 1776: 1659: 1611: 1566: 1513: 1444: 1391: 1338: 1296: 735:
decisions, mainly because of the Court's previous decisions in
520:(1937), stated that the scope of the interstate commerce power 471:
categories, the Court analyzed its validity under the third in
395:
reversed the decision 2–1. The Fourth Circuit reheard the case
41: 3542:
Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.
3412:
Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.
4039:
Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.
756:
combat sexual violence without making a federal case of it."
4391:
Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.
4359:
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.
2196:
Houston East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United States
5872:
United States Fourteenth Amendment, section five case law
489:, the majority replied that the aggregation principle of 5867:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
4047:
Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.
3643:
Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co.
428:
However, the Act's program funding remained unaffected.
409:
The Court's 5–4 decision invalidated the section of the
5084:
Northeast Bancorp v. Federal Reserve Board of Governors
2476:
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
1825:
Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. Illinois
1758:
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
1045:", Lewis & Clark L. Rev. (Winter 2005) (discussing 3510:
Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.
2711:
General Talking Pictures Corp. v. Western Electric Co.
401:
and reversed the panel, upholding the district court.
278:
Breyer, joined by Stevens; Souter, Ginsburg (Part I-A)
254:
Rehnquist, joined by O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas
3763:
Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com
3603:
Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.
2679:
Hollister v. Benedict & Burnham Manufacturing Co.
1929:
Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission
793:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 529
525:
local and create a completely centralized government.
4343:
Stanford University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.
3929:
Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists Television, Inc.
3470:
Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.
2765:
City of Elizabeth v. American Nicholson Pavement Co.
2404:
Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority
2089:
Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Assn. v. Thomas
995:
Brzonkala v. Va. Polytechnic Inst. & State Univ.
973:
Brzonkala v. Va. Polytechnic Inst. & State Univ.
951:
Brzonkala v. Va. Polytechnic Inst. & State Univ.
803:
Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume
585:, it exceeded congressional enforcement power under 136:
Brzonkala v. Va. Polytechnic Inst. & State Univ.
5799: 5646: 5591: 5438: 5267: 5187: 5165:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
4827: 4804: 4465: 4255:
Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.
4119:
Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co.
3963: 3797: 3584: 3459: 3430: 3400: 3267: 3182: 3129: 2924: 2799: 2721: 2659: 2614: 2577: 2520: 2107: 1790: 1043:
Dead? Assessing a Supreme Court Drug (Law) Overdose
282: 274: 266: 258: 250: 245: 174: 163: 131: 126: 116: 84: 70: 60: 53: 34: 5220:Carilion School of Medicine and Research Institute 3975:Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co. 3825:Order of St. Benedict of New Jersey v. Steinhauser 1985:South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. Wunnicke 5300:Virginia Tech Institute for Policy and Governance 4635:Immigration and Naturalization Service v. St. Cyr 4279:Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. 4215:Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co. 4015:Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp. 3518:TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc. 2300:United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n 727:do not permit various federal civil rights laws. 4651:Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam 4493:Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B. V. 4447:TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC 3526:Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. 3071:United Dictionary Co. v. G. & C. Merriam Co. 2073:Comptroller of the Treasury of Maryland v. Wynne 1977:White v. Mass. Council of Construction Employers 1633:Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha 1116:: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown ( 1098:. Archived from the original on November 1, 2005 5857:United States Constitution Article One case law 5230:School of Biomedical Engineering & Sciences 4948:Energy Reserves Group v. Kansas P. & L. Co. 4415:Akamai Techs., Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc. 4191:Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc. 3747:American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. v. Aereo, Inc. 2220:A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States 522: 5686:The Educational Media Company at Virginia Tech 4964:Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. DeBenedictis 4423:Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc. 4127:Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. 3913:Miller Music Corp. v. Charles N. Daniels, Inc. 3833:International News Service v. Associated Press 3358:F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Contemporary Arts, Inc. 3350:Fred Fisher Music Co. v. M. Witmark & Sons 3217:White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co. 3079:White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co. 5148: 4477:G. & C. Merriam Co. v. Syndicate Pub. Co. 4319:Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc. 3841:L. A. Westermann Co. v. Dispatch Printing Co. 3683:Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc. 2348:Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States 1308: 345:In his dissenting opinion, Associate Justice 8: 5235:College of Natural Resources and Environment 3441:Fashion Originators' Guild of America v. FTC 3286:DeJonge and Co. v. Breuker & Kessler Co. 3156:Fashion Originators' Guild of America v. FTC 1289:, 24 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 895 (2001). 5877:Violence against women in the United States 5817:List of Virginia Tech head football coaches 4908:Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. Blaisdell 3945:Teleprompter Corp. v. Columbia Broadcasting 3755:Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc. 3627:Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid 3595:Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co. 3390:Williams & Wilkins Co. v. United States 2268:McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co. 2033:C&A Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown 270:Souter, joined by Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer 5290:Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute 5225:School of Public and International Affairs 5215:College of Liberal Arts and Human Sciences 5155: 5141: 5133: 5033: 4991: 4801: 4784: 4666: 4586: 4512: 4263:Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd. 2574: 2560: 2517: 2503: 2212:Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. Olsen 2065:Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis 1787: 1773: 1656: 1608: 1563: 1510: 1441: 1388: 1335: 1315: 1301: 1293: 31: 5608:Washington-Alexandria Architecture Center 5200:College of Architecture and Urban Studies 4023:Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co. 3921:Pub. Affairs Associates, Inc. v. Rickover 3201:McLoughlin v. Raphael Tuck & Sons Co. 3164:United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. 3148:Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United States 3140:Straus v. American Publishers Association 3047:McLoughlin v. Raphael Tuck & Sons Co. 798:List of United States Supreme Court cases 511:under the guise of regulating commerce." 5195:College of Agriculture and Life Sciences 4335:Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S.A. 4055:Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. 3809:American Lithographic Co. v. Werkmeister 3731:Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 3039:Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co. 2252:NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. 1961:Kassel v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. 1702:Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. 607:. According to the Court, however, the 517:NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. 5275:Virginia Tech Corporate Research Center 4940:Allied Structural Steel Co. v. Spannaus 4351:Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership 3667:Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int'l, Inc. 3382:Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co. 3342:Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp. 2967:Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony 2097:National Pork Producers Council v. Ross 2017:Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. Hunt 1841:George W. Bush & Sons Co. v. Malloy 1710:Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. 1169:In Whose Best Interests? Not the States 849:"Christy Brzonkala v. Antonio Morrison" 813: 393:Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 5862:United States Commerce Clause case law 4303:KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. 4199:Eli Lilly & Co. v. Medtronic, Inc. 3953:Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. Aiken 3619:Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises 2260:United States v. Carolene Products Co. 1109: 1084:, (2000-05-16). Retrieved 2007-02-13. 5603:Virginia Tech National Capital Region 5108:Polar Tankers, Inc. v. City of Valdez 4868:Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge 4439:Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. 4407:Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International 4207:Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc. 3991:United States v. General Electric Co. 3771:Rimini Street Inc. v. Oracle USA Inc. 3739:Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. 3574:Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc. 3494:Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co. 2284:United States v. Wrightwood Dairy Co. 2180:Southern Railway Co. v. United States 1809:Willson v. Black-Bird Creek Marsh Co. 1394:Qualifications Clauses of Sections II 479:proposition the government relied on 303:decision that held that parts of the 29:2000 United States Supreme Court case 7: 5513:Virginia Tech–Boston College rivalry 5340:Virginia school of political economy 4932:U.S. Trust Co. of N.Y. v. New Jersey 3873:George v. Victor Talking Machine Co. 3787:Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. 3486:Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc. 3420:Morton Salt Co. v. G.S. Suppiger Co. 3209:American Tobacco Co. v. Werckmeister 3063:Werckmeister v. American Tobacco Co. 3055:American Tobacco Co. v. Werckmeister 2428:Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida 2140:Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. Ferguson 1969:Sporhase v. Nebraska ex rel. Douglas 1921:Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady 940:(1999-03-13). Retrieved 2007-02-13. 342:not to acts by private individuals. 5493:Virginia Tech–West Virginia rivalry 4485:Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co. 4431:Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC 3707:MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. 3534:Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc. 3241:Caliga v. Inter Ocean Newspaper Co. 3184:International Copyright Act of 1891 1945:Exxon Corp. v. Governor of Maryland 1015:See, e.g., Stephen L. Carter, "The 873:Hayden, Betty; Vertefeuille, Jane. 821:Hayden, Betty; Vertefeuille, Jane. 329:(1995), it was part of a series of 5498:Virginia Tech-Georgia Tech rivalry 5370:Mid Atlantic Terascale Partnership 5360:Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital 4295:MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc. 3659:Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. 3550:POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co. 2388:Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana 2372:National League of Cities v. Usery 1937:City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey 1889:Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. 1479:U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton 1418:U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton 1365:Department of Commerce v. New York 788:Congressional power of enforcement 646:had been rejected by the Court in 305:Violence Against Women Act of 1994 47:Supreme Court of the United States 25: 5892:United States Supreme Court cases 5578:Collegiate Water Polo Association 5390:Virginia School Leaders Institute 4311:Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp. 4271:eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C. 4143:United States v. Glaxo Group Ltd. 3983:Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Hyde 3334:Washingtonian Pub. Co. v. Pearson 3318:Buck v. Jewell-LaSalle Realty Co. 3172:Broadcast Music, Inc. v. CBS Inc. 2276:United States v. Darby Lumber Co. 2164:United States v. E. C. Knight Co. 2041:West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. Healy 1226:598 (2000) is available from: 1037:However, see Jonathan H. Adler, " 452:Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 365:, which contained a provision at 5812:List of Virginia Tech Presidents 5553:Virginia Tech IMG Sports Network 5400:Super Dual Auroral Radar Network 5258: 5116:Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado 4223:Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc. 3999:United States v. Univis Lens Co. 3849:Lumiere v. Mae Edna Wilder, Inc. 1913:Hughes v. Alexandria Scrap Corp. 1897:National Bellas Hess v. Illinois 1873:Dean Milk Co. v. City of Madison 1833:Swift & Co. v. United States 1202: 589:of the Fourteenth Amendment. In 450:(1995), which had held that the 40: 5240:College of Osteopathic Medicine 4729:Garner v. Board of Public Works 3857:Educational Films Corp. v. Ward 3715:Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick 3087:Dun v. Lumbermen's Credit Ass'n 2316:H.P. Hood & Sons v. Du Mond 1865:Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona 5887:2000 in United States case law 5475:Virginia Tech–Virginia rivalry 5295:Virginia Cooperative Extension 5250:College of Veterinary Medicine 2906:Mifflin v. R. H. White Company 1849:Baldwin v. G.A.F. Seelig, Inc. 1718:Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co. 901:"'No winners' in Rape Lawsuit" 1: 5731:Index of Middle English Verse 5661:Virginia Tech Corps of Cadets 5613:Virginia Tech Richmond Center 5380:Blacksburg Electronic Village 4916:W.B. Worthen Co. v. Kavanaugh 4844:Dartmouth College v. Woodward 3432:Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 3225:Globe Newspaper Co. v. Walker 3131:Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 2703:Bauer & Cie. v. O'Donnell 2604:Globe Newspaper Co. v. Walker 2081:South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. 2001:Healy v. Beer Institute, Inc. 1593:United States v. Munoz-Flores 5807:List of Virginia Tech alumni 5410:Head impact telemetry system 5018:Canton Railroad Co. v. Rogan 3691:New York Times Co. v. Tasini 2695:Schillinger v. United States 2332:Canton Railroad Co. v. Rogan 1881:Miller Bros. Co. v. Maryland 454:was unconstitutional. As in 299:, 529 U.S. 598 (2000), is a 5508:Virginia Tech–Miami rivalry 5205:Pamplin College of Business 4518:Necessary and Proper Clause 4287:LabCorp v. Metabolite, Inc. 3611:Mills Music, Inc. v. Snyder 3095:Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus 2236:Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan 2009:Quill Corp. v. North Dakota 1641:Clinton v. City of New York 1082:Editorial: States’ Business 514:The majority, quoting from 425:, to enact that provision. 5908: 5681:Virginia Tech Rescue Squad 5628:Preston and Olin Institute 5623:Hillcrest Honors Community 4924:City of El Paso v. Simmons 4571:United States v. Kebodeaux 4063:Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. Kuther 2324:Henderson v. United States 1905:Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. 1817:Cooley v. Board of Wardens 1662:Taxing and Spending Clause 1276:Oyez (oral argument audio) 1062:No Winners in Rape Lawsuit 663:, the Court, as it had in 411:Violence Against Women Act 363:Violence Against Women Act 5830: 5692:United States v. Morrison 5503:Virginia Tech-VMI rivalry 5450:Atlantic Coast Conference 5256: 5172: 5060:Virginia v. West Virginia 5046: 5032: 5004: 4990: 4800: 4783: 4683: 4672:No Bills of Attainder or 4665: 4605: 4585: 4563:United States v. Comstock 4525: 4511: 3905:Commissioner v. Wodehouse 3310:Fox Film Corp. v. Knowles 3257:Kalem Co. v. Harper Bros. 2573: 2559: 2516: 2502: 2460:United States v. Morrison 2412:New York v. United States 2308:North American Co. v. SEC 2244:Carter v. Carter Coal Co. 1786: 1772: 1694:Springer v. United States 1672: 1655: 1621: 1607: 1579: 1562: 1526: 1509: 1457: 1440: 1404: 1387: 1351: 1334: 1216:United States v. Morrison 1209:United States v. Morrison 296:United States v. Morrison 287: 179: 168: 39: 35:United States v. Morrison 5737:Hahn Horticulture Garden 5280:Virginia Tech Foundation 4852:Sturges v. Crowninshield 4745:Barr v. City of Columbia 4697:Sturges v. Crowninshield 4455:Peter v. NantKwest, Inc. 4087:Graham v. John Deere Co. 3881:KVOS v. Associated Press 3651:Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc. 3449:Dowling v. United States 3233:Bong v. Campbell Art Co. 3193:Press Pub. Co. v. Monroe 3111:Bong v. Campbell Art Co. 1585:Flint v. Stone Tracy Co. 1540:United States v. Johnson 1174:October 4, 2006, at the 956:935 F. Supp. 779 638:City of Boerne v. Flores 579:Civil Rights Act of 1875 5671:The Marching Virginians 5285:Biocomplexity Institute 4956:Exxon Corp. v. Eagerton 4159:Sakraida v. Ag Pro Inc. 3937:Goldstein v. California 3865:Fox Film Corp. v. Doyal 3278:Hills and Co. v. Hoover 3249:Hills and Co. v. Hoover 2484:Taylor v. United States 1792:Dormant Commerce Clause 1726:United States v. Butler 1678:Hylton v. United States 1548:Gravel v. United States 1516:Speech or Debate Clause 564:United States v. Harris 537:United States v. Harris 530:Equal Protection Clause 321:Equal Protection Clause 54:Argued January 11, 2000 5764:Virginia Tech shooting 5210:College of Engineering 5092:New Jersey v. New York 4547:Sabri v. United States 4375:Bowman v. Monsanto Co. 4175:Diamond v. Chakrabarty 4095:United States v. Adams 3374:De Sylva v. Ballentine 3294:Herbert v. Shanley Co. 3119:Henry v. A.B. Dick Co. 2959:Schreiber v. Sharpless 2741:Hotchkiss v. Greenwood 2452:Jones v. United States 2444:United States v. Locke 2420:United States v. Lopez 1750:Sabri v. United States 667:, again distinguished 527: 447:United States v. Lopez 359:United States Congress 326:United States v. Lopez 5822:Commencement speakers 5330:Stability Wind Tunnel 5068:Virginia v. Tennessee 4531:McCulloch v. Maryland 3586:Copyright Act of 1976 3326:Douglas v. Cunningham 3269:Copyright Act of 1909 2975:Thornton v. Schreiber 2926:Copyright Act of 1870 2801:Copyright Act of 1831 2579:Copyright Act of 1790 2541:Juilliard v. Greenman 2356:Katzenbach v. McClung 2188:Hoke v. United States 1953:Reeves, Inc. v. Stake 1857:Edwards v. California 847:Motz Gribbon, Diane. 747:came out in favor of 694:Seventeenth Amendment 103:120 S. Ct. 1740; 146 5430:Virginia Cyber Range 5180:Blacksburg, Virginia 5100:Virginia v. Maryland 4997:Import-Export Clause 4884:Stone v. Mississippi 4539:Lambert v. Yellowley 4399:FTC v. Actavis, Inc. 4135:Gottschalk v. Benson 4111:Lear, Inc. v. Adkins 4071:Brulotte v. Thys Co. 3031:Bolles v. Outing Co. 2898:Bolles v. Outing Co. 1742:South Dakota v. Dole 1532:Kilbourn v. Thompson 1000:169 F.3d 820 978:132 F.3d 949 690:Fourteenth Amendment 656:Katzenbach v. Morgan 423:Fourteenth Amendment 317:Fourteenth Amendment 56:Decided May 15, 2000 5315:Virginia Smart Road 4817:Hepburn v. Griswold 4761:Kansas v. Hendricks 4737:De Veau v. Braisted 4007:Altvater v. Freeman 3015:Belford v. Scribner 2999:Thompson v. Hubbard 2983:Banks v. Manchester 2834:Stevens v. Gladding 2733:Pennock v. Dialogue 2661:Patent infringement 2340:Boynton v. Virginia 2204:Hammer v. Dagenhart 1410:Powell v. McCormack 1267:Library of Congress 1184:Legal Intelligencer 1138:on November 1, 2005 1078:The Washington Post 1066:The Washington Post 1060:Masters, Brooke. " 899:Masters, Brooke A. 761:Catharine MacKinnon 744:The Washington Post 683:Dissenting opinions 671:on the ground that 230:Ruth Bader Ginsburg 202:Sandra Day O'Connor 5781:Blacksburg Transit 5676:The New Virginians 5633:Reynolds Homestead 5538:Women's basketball 5320:eCorridors Program 5245:College of Science 5052:Florida v. Georgia 4807:Legal Tender Cases 4721:Samuels v. McCurdy 4713:Hawker v. New York 4643:Boumediene v. Bush 4231:Dickinson v. Zurko 3699:Eldred v. Ashcroft 3302:Manners v. Morosco 3103:Scribner v. Straus 3007:Higgins v. Keuffel 2991:Callaghan v. Myers 2874:Higgins v. Keuffel 2866:Callaghan v. Myers 2773:Egbert v. Lippmann 2757:Cochrane v. Deener 2616:Patent Act of 1793 2523:Legal Tender Cases 2292:Wickard v. Filburn 1734:Helvering v. Davis 1614:Presentment Clause 1569:Origination Clause 1341:Enumeration Clause 1324:U.S. Supreme Court 1093:Kaminer, Wendy. " 633:Civil Rights Cases 622:Civil Rights Cases 617:Civil Rights Cases 613:Civil Rights Cases 609:Civil Rights Cases 605:Civil Rights Cases 583:Civil Rights Cases 575:Civil Rights Cases 570:Civil Rights Cases 555:Civil Rights Cases 543:Civil Rights Cases 482:Wickard v. Filburn 301:U.S. Supreme Court 190:Associate Justices 5844: 5843: 5791:Police Department 5455:Fighting Gobblers 5130: 5129: 5126: 5125: 5028: 5027: 5010:Brown v. Maryland 4986: 4985: 4982: 4981: 4876:Bronson v. Kinzie 4860:Ogden v. Saunders 4779: 4778: 4661: 4660: 4619:Ex parte Merryman 4595:Suspension Clause 4581: 4580: 4555:Gonzales v. Raich 4507: 4506: 4503: 4502: 4103:Brenner v. Manson 3897:Buck v. Gallagher 3817:Ferris v. Frohman 3566:Iancu v. Brunetti 2935:Perris v. Hexamer 2914:Mifflin v. Dutton 2810:Wheaton v. Peters 2749:O'Reilly v. Morse 2687:Rowell v. Lindsay 2588:Wheaton v. Peters 2555: 2554: 2551: 2550: 2498: 2497: 2494: 2493: 2468:Gonzales v. Raich 2364:Maryland v. Wirtz 2228:Gold Clause Cases 2049:Granholm v. Heald 1801:Brown v. Maryland 1768: 1767: 1651: 1650: 1603: 1602: 1558: 1557: 1505: 1504: 1436: 1435: 1383: 1382: 1373:Trump v. New York 1283:Dimino, Michael. 1207:Works related to 1132:"Sexual Congress" 1124:American Prospect 1096:"Sexual Congress" 1048:Gonzalez v. Raich 932:Taylor, Stuart. " 739:and other cases. 725:enumerated powers 339:William Rehnquist 292: 291: 186:William Rehnquist 18:Christy Brzonkala 16:(Redirected from 5899: 5754:New River Valley 5748:Graduating Peter 5655:Collegiate Times 5595: 5563:Cassell Coliseum 5533:Men's basketball 5487:men's basketball 5442: 5262: 5181: 5166: 5157: 5150: 5143: 5134: 5034: 4992: 4836:Fletcher v. Peck 4802: 4785: 4705:Ex parte Garland 4667: 4611:Ex parte Bollman 4587: 4513: 4327:Bilski v. Kappos 4183:Diamond v. Diehr 4151:Dann v. Johnston 3635:Stewart v. Abend 2943:Trade-Mark Cases 2826:Stephens v. Cady 2649:Evans v. Hettich 2575: 2566:Copyright Clause 2561: 2518: 2504: 2172:Champion v. Ames 2132:Paul v. Virginia 2116:Gibbons v. Ogden 1788: 1774: 1686:Collector v. Day 1657: 1626:Pocket Veto Case 1609: 1564: 1511: 1463:Ex parte Siebold 1447:Elections Clause 1442: 1389: 1336: 1317: 1310: 1303: 1294: 1280: 1274: 1271: 1265: 1262: 1256: 1253: 1247: 1244: 1238: 1235: 1229: 1206: 1191: 1167:Shane, Peter. " 1165: 1159: 1156: 1150: 1147: 1145: 1143: 1134:. Archived from 1121: 1115: 1107: 1105: 1103: 1091: 1085: 1075: 1069: 1058: 1052: 1035: 1029: 1026: 1020: 1013: 1007: 997: 991: 985: 975: 969: 963: 953: 947: 941: 938:National Journal 930: 924: 923: 921: 919: 896: 890: 889: 887: 885: 870: 864: 863: 861: 859: 844: 838: 837: 835: 833: 818: 432:Majority opinion 175:Court membership 44: 43: 32: 21: 5907: 5906: 5902: 5901: 5900: 5898: 5897: 5896: 5847: 5846: 5845: 5840: 5826: 5795: 5776:Stroubles Creek 5666:Highty-Tighties 5642: 5593: 5587: 5573:Berglund Center 5440: 5434: 5263: 5254: 5183: 5179: 5168: 5164: 5161: 5131: 5122: 5076:Wharton v. Wise 5042: 5024: 5000: 4978: 4823: 4796: 4790:Contract Clause 4775: 4679: 4657: 4601: 4577: 4521: 4520:of Section VIII 4499: 4468:trademark cases 4461: 4367:Kappos v. Hyatt 4167:Parker v. Flook 3959: 3800:copyright cases 3793: 3779:Allen v. Cooper 3723:Golan v. Holder 3580: 3455: 3426: 3396: 3263: 3178: 3125: 2951:Merrell v. Tice 2920: 2882:Holmes v. Hurst 2858:Baker v. Selden 2818:Backus v. Gould 2795: 2717: 2671:Evans v. Jordan 2655: 2610: 2569: 2568:of Section VIII 2547: 2512: 2511:of Section VIII 2490: 2396:EEOC v. Wyoming 2148:Kidd v. Pearson 2124:Passenger Cases 2103: 1993:Maine v. Taylor 1782: 1781:of Section VIII 1779:Commerce Clause 1764: 1668: 1647: 1617: 1599: 1575: 1554: 1522: 1501: 1495:Moore v. Harper 1453: 1432: 1426:Cook v. Gralike 1400: 1379: 1347: 1330: 1321: 1278: 1272: 1269: 1263: 1260: 1254: 1251: 1245: 1242: 1236: 1233: 1227: 1199: 1194: 1180:Washington Post 1176:Wayback Machine 1166: 1162: 1157: 1153: 1141: 1139: 1130: 1108: 1101: 1099: 1094: 1092: 1088: 1076: 1072: 1059: 1055: 1036: 1032: 1027: 1023: 1014: 1010: 993: 992: 988: 971: 970: 966: 949: 948: 944: 931: 927: 917: 915: 898: 897: 893: 883: 881: 879:Virginian Pilot 872: 871: 867: 857: 855: 846: 845: 841: 831: 829: 827:Virginian Pilot 820: 819: 815: 811: 783:Rehnquist Court 779: 702: 685: 567:(1883) and the 540:(1883) and the 532: 442: 440:Commerce Clause 434: 419:Commerce Clause 407: 355: 331:Rehnquist Court 313:Commerce Clause 228: 226:Clarence Thomas 216: 214:Anthony Kennedy 204: 194:John P. Stevens 112: 77: 55: 49: 30: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 5905: 5903: 5895: 5894: 5889: 5884: 5879: 5874: 5869: 5864: 5859: 5849: 5848: 5842: 5841: 5839: 5838: 5831: 5828: 5827: 5825: 5824: 5819: 5814: 5809: 5803: 5801: 5797: 5796: 5794: 5793: 5788: 5783: 5778: 5773: 5772: 5771: 5761: 5756: 5751: 5744: 5739: 5734: 5727: 5722: 5719:Tech Talk Live 5715: 5710: 5705: 5700: 5695: 5688: 5683: 5678: 5673: 5668: 5663: 5658: 5650: 5648: 5644: 5643: 5641: 5640: 5635: 5630: 5625: 5620: 5615: 5610: 5605: 5599: 5597: 5589: 5588: 5586: 5585: 5583:Thompson Field 5580: 5575: 5570: 5565: 5560: 5555: 5550: 5545: 5540: 5535: 5530: 5528:Women's soccer 5525: 5520: 5515: 5510: 5505: 5500: 5495: 5490: 5472: 5467: 5462: 5457: 5452: 5446: 5444: 5436: 5435: 5433: 5432: 5427: 5422: 5417: 5412: 5407: 5402: 5397: 5392: 5387: 5382: 5377: 5372: 5367: 5362: 5357: 5352: 5347: 5342: 5337: 5332: 5327: 5322: 5317: 5312: 5307: 5302: 5297: 5292: 5287: 5282: 5277: 5271: 5269: 5265: 5264: 5257: 5255: 5253: 5252: 5247: 5242: 5237: 5232: 5227: 5222: 5217: 5212: 5207: 5202: 5197: 5191: 5189: 5185: 5184: 5173: 5170: 5169: 5162: 5160: 5159: 5152: 5145: 5137: 5128: 5127: 5124: 5123: 5121: 5120: 5112: 5104: 5096: 5088: 5080: 5072: 5064: 5056: 5047: 5044: 5043: 5039:Compact Clause 5037: 5030: 5029: 5026: 5025: 5023: 5022: 5014: 5005: 5002: 5001: 4995: 4988: 4987: 4984: 4983: 4980: 4979: 4977: 4976: 4972:Sveen v. Melin 4968: 4960: 4952: 4944: 4936: 4928: 4920: 4912: 4904: 4900:Block v. Hirsh 4896: 4888: 4880: 4872: 4864: 4856: 4848: 4840: 4831: 4829: 4825: 4824: 4822: 4821: 4812: 4810: 4798: 4797: 4788: 4781: 4780: 4777: 4776: 4774: 4773: 4765: 4757: 4753:Teague v. Lane 4749: 4741: 4733: 4725: 4717: 4709: 4701: 4693: 4689:Calder v. Bull 4684: 4681: 4680: 4670: 4663: 4662: 4659: 4658: 4656: 4655: 4647: 4639: 4631: 4623: 4615: 4606: 4603: 4602: 4590: 4583: 4582: 4579: 4578: 4576: 4575: 4567: 4559: 4551: 4543: 4535: 4526: 4523: 4522: 4516: 4509: 4508: 4505: 4504: 4501: 4500: 4498: 4497: 4489: 4481: 4472: 4470: 4463: 4462: 4460: 4459: 4451: 4443: 4435: 4427: 4419: 4411: 4403: 4395: 4387: 4383:Gunn v. Minton 4379: 4371: 4363: 4355: 4347: 4339: 4331: 4323: 4315: 4307: 4299: 4291: 4283: 4275: 4267: 4259: 4251: 4243: 4235: 4227: 4219: 4211: 4203: 4195: 4187: 4179: 4171: 4163: 4155: 4147: 4139: 4131: 4123: 4115: 4107: 4099: 4091: 4083: 4075: 4067: 4059: 4051: 4043: 4035: 4027: 4019: 4011: 4003: 3995: 3987: 3979: 3970: 3968: 3961: 3960: 3958: 3957: 3949: 3941: 3933: 3925: 3917: 3909: 3901: 3893: 3885: 3877: 3869: 3861: 3853: 3845: 3837: 3829: 3821: 3813: 3804: 3802: 3795: 3794: 3792: 3791: 3783: 3775: 3767: 3759: 3751: 3743: 3735: 3727: 3719: 3711: 3703: 3695: 3687: 3679: 3671: 3663: 3655: 3647: 3639: 3631: 3623: 3615: 3607: 3599: 3590: 3588: 3582: 3581: 3579: 3578: 3570: 3562: 3554: 3546: 3538: 3530: 3522: 3514: 3506: 3498: 3490: 3482: 3474: 3465: 3463: 3457: 3456: 3454: 3453: 3445: 3436: 3434: 3428: 3427: 3425: 3424: 3416: 3407: 3405: 3398: 3397: 3395: 3394: 3386: 3378: 3370: 3366:Mazer v. Stein 3362: 3354: 3346: 3338: 3330: 3322: 3314: 3306: 3298: 3290: 3282: 3273: 3271: 3265: 3264: 3262: 3261: 3253: 3245: 3237: 3229: 3221: 3213: 3205: 3197: 3188: 3186: 3180: 3179: 3177: 3176: 3168: 3160: 3152: 3144: 3135: 3133: 3127: 3126: 3124: 3123: 3115: 3107: 3099: 3091: 3083: 3075: 3067: 3059: 3051: 3043: 3035: 3027: 3019: 3011: 3003: 2995: 2987: 2979: 2971: 2963: 2955: 2947: 2939: 2930: 2928: 2922: 2921: 2919: 2918: 2910: 2902: 2894: 2886: 2878: 2870: 2862: 2854: 2850:Paige v. Banks 2846: 2842:Little v. Hall 2838: 2830: 2822: 2814: 2805: 2803: 2797: 2796: 2794: 2793: 2789:Voss v. Fisher 2785: 2777: 2769: 2761: 2753: 2745: 2737: 2728: 2726: 2719: 2718: 2716: 2715: 2707: 2699: 2691: 2683: 2675: 2666: 2664: 2657: 2656: 2654: 2653: 2645: 2641:Evans v. Eaton 2637: 2633:Evans v. Eaton 2629: 2620: 2618: 2612: 2611: 2609: 2608: 2600: 2596:Paige v. Banks 2592: 2583: 2581: 2571: 2570: 2564: 2557: 2556: 2553: 2552: 2549: 2548: 2546: 2545: 2537: 2528: 2526: 2514: 2513: 2509:Coinage Clause 2507: 2500: 2499: 2496: 2495: 2492: 2491: 2489: 2488: 2480: 2472: 2464: 2456: 2448: 2440: 2436:Reno v. Condon 2432: 2424: 2416: 2408: 2400: 2392: 2384: 2376: 2368: 2360: 2352: 2344: 2336: 2328: 2320: 2312: 2304: 2296: 2288: 2280: 2272: 2264: 2256: 2248: 2240: 2232: 2224: 2216: 2208: 2200: 2192: 2184: 2176: 2168: 2160: 2152: 2144: 2136: 2128: 2120: 2111: 2109: 2105: 2104: 2102: 2101: 2093: 2085: 2077: 2069: 2061: 2053: 2045: 2037: 2029: 2021: 2013: 2005: 1997: 1989: 1981: 1973: 1965: 1957: 1949: 1941: 1933: 1925: 1917: 1909: 1901: 1893: 1885: 1877: 1869: 1861: 1853: 1845: 1837: 1829: 1821: 1813: 1805: 1796: 1794: 1784: 1783: 1777: 1770: 1769: 1766: 1765: 1763: 1762: 1754: 1746: 1738: 1730: 1722: 1714: 1706: 1698: 1690: 1682: 1673: 1670: 1669: 1660: 1653: 1652: 1649: 1648: 1646: 1645: 1637: 1629: 1622: 1619: 1618: 1616:of Section VII 1612: 1605: 1604: 1601: 1600: 1598: 1597: 1589: 1580: 1577: 1576: 1567: 1560: 1559: 1556: 1555: 1553: 1552: 1544: 1536: 1527: 1524: 1523: 1514: 1507: 1506: 1503: 1502: 1500: 1499: 1491: 1483: 1475: 1471:Smiley v. Holm 1467: 1458: 1455: 1454: 1445: 1438: 1437: 1434: 1433: 1431: 1430: 1422: 1414: 1405: 1402: 1401: 1392: 1385: 1384: 1381: 1380: 1378: 1377: 1369: 1361: 1352: 1349: 1348: 1339: 1332: 1331: 1322: 1320: 1319: 1312: 1305: 1297: 1291: 1290: 1281: 1249:Google Scholar 1212: 1198: 1197:External links 1195: 1193: 1192: 1190:, (2000-01-12) 1188:New York Times 1160: 1151: 1149: 1148: 1086: 1070: 1053: 1030: 1021: 1008: 986: 964: 942: 925: 891: 865: 839: 812: 810: 807: 806: 805: 800: 795: 790: 785: 778: 775: 770:Peter M. Shane 701: 698: 684: 681: 531: 528: 441: 438: 433: 430: 406: 403: 376:That fall, at 367:42 U.S.C. 354: 351: 290: 289: 285: 284: 280: 279: 276: 272: 271: 268: 264: 263: 260: 256: 255: 252: 248: 247: 243: 242: 241: 240: 238:Stephen Breyer 206:Antonin Scalia 191: 188: 183: 177: 176: 172: 171: 166: 165: 161: 160: 133: 129: 128: 124: 123: 118: 114: 113: 102: 86: 82: 81: 72: 68: 67: 62: 61:Full case name 58: 57: 51: 50: 45: 37: 36: 28: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5904: 5893: 5890: 5888: 5885: 5883: 5882:Virginia Tech 5880: 5878: 5875: 5873: 5870: 5868: 5865: 5863: 5860: 5858: 5855: 5854: 5852: 5836: 5833: 5832: 5829: 5823: 5820: 5818: 5815: 5813: 5810: 5808: 5805: 5804: 5802: 5798: 5792: 5789: 5787: 5784: 5782: 5779: 5777: 5774: 5770: 5769:Seung-Hui Cho 5767: 5766: 5765: 5762: 5760: 5757: 5755: 5752: 5750: 5749: 5745: 5743: 5740: 5738: 5735: 5733: 5732: 5728: 5726: 5723: 5721: 5720: 5716: 5714: 5711: 5709: 5706: 5704: 5701: 5699: 5696: 5694: 5693: 5689: 5687: 5684: 5682: 5679: 5677: 5674: 5672: 5669: 5667: 5664: 5662: 5659: 5657: 5656: 5652: 5651: 5649: 5645: 5639: 5636: 5634: 5631: 5629: 5626: 5624: 5621: 5619: 5618:Hotel Roanoke 5616: 5614: 5611: 5609: 5606: 5604: 5601: 5600: 5598: 5596: 5590: 5584: 5581: 5579: 5576: 5574: 5571: 5569: 5568:English Field 5566: 5564: 5561: 5559: 5556: 5554: 5551: 5549: 5546: 5544: 5541: 5539: 5536: 5534: 5531: 5529: 5526: 5524: 5521: 5519: 5516: 5514: 5511: 5509: 5506: 5504: 5501: 5499: 5496: 5494: 5491: 5488: 5484: 5480: 5476: 5473: 5471: 5468: 5466: 5463: 5461: 5458: 5456: 5453: 5451: 5448: 5447: 5445: 5443: 5437: 5431: 5428: 5426: 5425:Sugar battery 5423: 5421: 5418: 5416: 5413: 5411: 5408: 5406: 5403: 5401: 5398: 5396: 5393: 5391: 5388: 5386: 5383: 5381: 5378: 5376: 5373: 5371: 5368: 5366: 5363: 5361: 5358: 5356: 5353: 5351: 5348: 5346: 5343: 5341: 5338: 5336: 5333: 5331: 5328: 5326: 5323: 5321: 5318: 5316: 5313: 5311: 5308: 5306: 5303: 5301: 5298: 5296: 5293: 5291: 5288: 5286: 5283: 5281: 5278: 5276: 5273: 5272: 5270: 5266: 5261: 5251: 5248: 5246: 5243: 5241: 5238: 5236: 5233: 5231: 5228: 5226: 5223: 5221: 5218: 5216: 5213: 5211: 5208: 5206: 5203: 5201: 5198: 5196: 5193: 5192: 5190: 5186: 5182: 5176: 5171: 5167: 5158: 5153: 5151: 5146: 5144: 5139: 5138: 5135: 5118: 5117: 5113: 5110: 5109: 5105: 5102: 5101: 5097: 5094: 5093: 5089: 5086: 5085: 5081: 5078: 5077: 5073: 5070: 5069: 5065: 5062: 5061: 5057: 5054: 5053: 5049: 5048: 5045: 5040: 5035: 5031: 5020: 5019: 5015: 5012: 5011: 5007: 5006: 5003: 4998: 4993: 4989: 4974: 4973: 4969: 4966: 4965: 4961: 4958: 4957: 4953: 4950: 4949: 4945: 4942: 4941: 4937: 4934: 4933: 4929: 4926: 4925: 4921: 4918: 4917: 4913: 4910: 4909: 4905: 4902: 4901: 4897: 4894: 4893: 4892:Smyth v. Ames 4889: 4886: 4885: 4881: 4878: 4877: 4873: 4870: 4869: 4865: 4862: 4861: 4857: 4854: 4853: 4849: 4846: 4845: 4841: 4838: 4837: 4833: 4832: 4830: 4826: 4819: 4818: 4814: 4813: 4811: 4809: 4808: 4803: 4799: 4795: 4791: 4786: 4782: 4771: 4770: 4766: 4763: 4762: 4758: 4755: 4754: 4750: 4747: 4746: 4742: 4739: 4738: 4734: 4731: 4730: 4726: 4723: 4722: 4718: 4715: 4714: 4710: 4707: 4706: 4702: 4699: 4698: 4694: 4691: 4690: 4686: 4685: 4682: 4678:of Section IX 4677: 4675: 4674:Ex post facto 4668: 4664: 4653: 4652: 4648: 4645: 4644: 4640: 4637: 4636: 4632: 4629: 4628: 4627:Ex parte Endo 4624: 4621: 4620: 4616: 4613: 4612: 4608: 4607: 4604: 4600: 4596: 4594: 4593:Habeas corpus 4588: 4584: 4573: 4572: 4568: 4565: 4564: 4560: 4557: 4556: 4552: 4549: 4548: 4544: 4541: 4540: 4536: 4533: 4532: 4528: 4527: 4524: 4519: 4514: 4510: 4495: 4494: 4490: 4487: 4486: 4482: 4479: 4478: 4474: 4473: 4471: 4469: 4464: 4457: 4456: 4452: 4449: 4448: 4444: 4441: 4440: 4436: 4433: 4432: 4428: 4425: 4424: 4420: 4417: 4416: 4412: 4409: 4408: 4404: 4401: 4400: 4396: 4393: 4392: 4388: 4385: 4384: 4380: 4377: 4376: 4372: 4369: 4368: 4364: 4361: 4360: 4356: 4353: 4352: 4348: 4345: 4344: 4340: 4337: 4336: 4332: 4329: 4328: 4324: 4321: 4320: 4316: 4313: 4312: 4308: 4305: 4304: 4300: 4297: 4296: 4292: 4289: 4288: 4284: 4281: 4280: 4276: 4273: 4272: 4268: 4265: 4264: 4260: 4257: 4256: 4252: 4249: 4248: 4244: 4241: 4240: 4236: 4233: 4232: 4228: 4225: 4224: 4220: 4217: 4216: 4212: 4209: 4208: 4204: 4201: 4200: 4196: 4193: 4192: 4188: 4185: 4184: 4180: 4177: 4176: 4172: 4169: 4168: 4164: 4161: 4160: 4156: 4153: 4152: 4148: 4145: 4144: 4140: 4137: 4136: 4132: 4129: 4128: 4124: 4121: 4120: 4116: 4113: 4112: 4108: 4105: 4104: 4100: 4097: 4096: 4092: 4089: 4088: 4084: 4081: 4080: 4076: 4073: 4072: 4068: 4065: 4064: 4060: 4057: 4056: 4052: 4049: 4048: 4044: 4041: 4040: 4036: 4033: 4032: 4028: 4025: 4024: 4020: 4017: 4016: 4012: 4009: 4008: 4004: 4001: 4000: 3996: 3993: 3992: 3988: 3985: 3984: 3980: 3977: 3976: 3972: 3971: 3969: 3967: 3962: 3955: 3954: 3950: 3947: 3946: 3942: 3939: 3938: 3934: 3931: 3930: 3926: 3923: 3922: 3918: 3915: 3914: 3910: 3907: 3906: 3902: 3899: 3898: 3894: 3891: 3890: 3889:Gibbs v. Buck 3886: 3883: 3882: 3878: 3875: 3874: 3870: 3867: 3866: 3862: 3859: 3858: 3854: 3851: 3850: 3846: 3843: 3842: 3838: 3835: 3834: 3830: 3827: 3826: 3822: 3819: 3818: 3814: 3811: 3810: 3806: 3805: 3803: 3801: 3796: 3789: 3788: 3784: 3781: 3780: 3776: 3773: 3772: 3768: 3765: 3764: 3760: 3757: 3756: 3752: 3749: 3748: 3744: 3741: 3740: 3736: 3733: 3732: 3728: 3725: 3724: 3720: 3717: 3716: 3712: 3709: 3708: 3704: 3701: 3700: 3696: 3693: 3692: 3688: 3685: 3684: 3680: 3677: 3676: 3672: 3669: 3668: 3664: 3661: 3660: 3656: 3653: 3652: 3648: 3645: 3644: 3640: 3637: 3636: 3632: 3629: 3628: 3624: 3621: 3620: 3616: 3613: 3612: 3608: 3605: 3604: 3600: 3597: 3596: 3592: 3591: 3589: 3587: 3583: 3576: 3575: 3571: 3568: 3567: 3563: 3560: 3559: 3555: 3552: 3551: 3547: 3544: 3543: 3539: 3536: 3535: 3531: 3528: 3527: 3523: 3520: 3519: 3515: 3512: 3511: 3507: 3504: 3503: 3499: 3496: 3495: 3491: 3488: 3487: 3483: 3480: 3479: 3475: 3472: 3471: 3467: 3466: 3464: 3462: 3458: 3451: 3450: 3446: 3443: 3442: 3438: 3437: 3435: 3433: 3429: 3422: 3421: 3417: 3414: 3413: 3409: 3408: 3406: 3403: 3402:Patent misuse 3399: 3392: 3391: 3387: 3384: 3383: 3379: 3376: 3375: 3371: 3368: 3367: 3363: 3360: 3359: 3355: 3352: 3351: 3347: 3344: 3343: 3339: 3336: 3335: 3331: 3328: 3327: 3323: 3320: 3319: 3315: 3312: 3311: 3307: 3304: 3303: 3299: 3296: 3295: 3291: 3288: 3287: 3283: 3280: 3279: 3275: 3274: 3272: 3270: 3266: 3259: 3258: 3254: 3251: 3250: 3246: 3243: 3242: 3238: 3235: 3234: 3230: 3227: 3226: 3222: 3219: 3218: 3214: 3211: 3210: 3206: 3203: 3202: 3198: 3195: 3194: 3190: 3189: 3187: 3185: 3181: 3174: 3173: 3169: 3166: 3165: 3161: 3158: 3157: 3153: 3150: 3149: 3145: 3142: 3141: 3137: 3136: 3134: 3132: 3128: 3121: 3120: 3116: 3113: 3112: 3108: 3105: 3104: 3100: 3097: 3096: 3092: 3089: 3088: 3084: 3081: 3080: 3076: 3073: 3072: 3068: 3065: 3064: 3060: 3057: 3056: 3052: 3049: 3048: 3044: 3041: 3040: 3036: 3033: 3032: 3028: 3025: 3024: 3023:Brady v. Daly 3020: 3017: 3016: 3012: 3009: 3008: 3004: 3001: 3000: 2996: 2993: 2992: 2988: 2985: 2984: 2980: 2977: 2976: 2972: 2969: 2968: 2964: 2961: 2960: 2956: 2953: 2952: 2948: 2945: 2944: 2940: 2937: 2936: 2932: 2931: 2929: 2927: 2923: 2916: 2915: 2911: 2908: 2907: 2903: 2900: 2899: 2895: 2892: 2891: 2890:Brady v. Daly 2887: 2884: 2883: 2879: 2876: 2875: 2871: 2868: 2867: 2863: 2860: 2859: 2855: 2852: 2851: 2847: 2844: 2843: 2839: 2836: 2835: 2831: 2828: 2827: 2823: 2820: 2819: 2815: 2812: 2811: 2807: 2806: 2804: 2802: 2798: 2791: 2790: 2786: 2783: 2782: 2778: 2775: 2774: 2770: 2767: 2766: 2762: 2759: 2758: 2754: 2751: 2750: 2746: 2743: 2742: 2738: 2735: 2734: 2730: 2729: 2727: 2724: 2723:Patentability 2720: 2713: 2712: 2708: 2705: 2704: 2700: 2697: 2696: 2692: 2689: 2688: 2684: 2681: 2680: 2676: 2673: 2672: 2668: 2667: 2665: 2662: 2658: 2651: 2650: 2646: 2643: 2642: 2638: 2635: 2634: 2630: 2627: 2626: 2625:Tyler v. Tuel 2622: 2621: 2619: 2617: 2613: 2606: 2605: 2601: 2598: 2597: 2593: 2590: 2589: 2585: 2584: 2582: 2580: 2576: 2572: 2567: 2562: 2558: 2543: 2542: 2538: 2535: 2534: 2530: 2529: 2527: 2525: 2524: 2519: 2515: 2510: 2505: 2501: 2486: 2485: 2481: 2478: 2477: 2473: 2470: 2469: 2465: 2462: 2461: 2457: 2454: 2453: 2449: 2446: 2445: 2441: 2438: 2437: 2433: 2430: 2429: 2425: 2422: 2421: 2417: 2414: 2413: 2409: 2406: 2405: 2401: 2398: 2397: 2393: 2390: 2389: 2385: 2382: 2381: 2377: 2374: 2373: 2369: 2366: 2365: 2361: 2358: 2357: 2353: 2350: 2349: 2345: 2342: 2341: 2337: 2334: 2333: 2329: 2326: 2325: 2321: 2318: 2317: 2313: 2310: 2309: 2305: 2302: 2301: 2297: 2294: 2293: 2289: 2286: 2285: 2281: 2278: 2277: 2273: 2270: 2269: 2265: 2262: 2261: 2257: 2254: 2253: 2249: 2246: 2245: 2241: 2238: 2237: 2233: 2230: 2229: 2225: 2222: 2221: 2217: 2214: 2213: 2209: 2206: 2205: 2201: 2198: 2197: 2193: 2190: 2189: 2185: 2182: 2181: 2177: 2174: 2173: 2169: 2166: 2165: 2161: 2158: 2157: 2153: 2150: 2149: 2145: 2142: 2141: 2137: 2134: 2133: 2129: 2126: 2125: 2121: 2118: 2117: 2113: 2112: 2110: 2106: 2099: 2098: 2094: 2091: 2090: 2086: 2083: 2082: 2078: 2075: 2074: 2070: 2067: 2066: 2062: 2059: 2058: 2054: 2051: 2050: 2046: 2043: 2042: 2038: 2035: 2034: 2030: 2027: 2026: 2022: 2019: 2018: 2014: 2011: 2010: 2006: 2003: 2002: 1998: 1995: 1994: 1990: 1987: 1986: 1982: 1979: 1978: 1974: 1971: 1970: 1966: 1963: 1962: 1958: 1955: 1954: 1950: 1947: 1946: 1942: 1939: 1938: 1934: 1931: 1930: 1926: 1923: 1922: 1918: 1915: 1914: 1910: 1907: 1906: 1902: 1899: 1898: 1894: 1891: 1890: 1886: 1883: 1882: 1878: 1875: 1874: 1870: 1867: 1866: 1862: 1859: 1858: 1854: 1851: 1850: 1846: 1843: 1842: 1838: 1835: 1834: 1830: 1827: 1826: 1822: 1819: 1818: 1814: 1811: 1810: 1806: 1803: 1802: 1798: 1797: 1795: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1780: 1775: 1771: 1760: 1759: 1755: 1752: 1751: 1747: 1744: 1743: 1739: 1736: 1735: 1731: 1728: 1727: 1723: 1720: 1719: 1715: 1712: 1711: 1707: 1704: 1703: 1699: 1696: 1695: 1691: 1688: 1687: 1683: 1680: 1679: 1675: 1674: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1658: 1654: 1643: 1642: 1638: 1635: 1634: 1630: 1627: 1624: 1623: 1620: 1615: 1610: 1606: 1595: 1594: 1590: 1587: 1586: 1582: 1581: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1565: 1561: 1550: 1549: 1545: 1542: 1541: 1537: 1534: 1533: 1529: 1528: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1512: 1508: 1497: 1496: 1492: 1489: 1488: 1484: 1481: 1480: 1476: 1473: 1472: 1468: 1465: 1464: 1460: 1459: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1443: 1439: 1428: 1427: 1423: 1420: 1419: 1415: 1412: 1411: 1407: 1406: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1390: 1386: 1375: 1374: 1370: 1367: 1366: 1362: 1359: 1358: 1357:Utah v. Evans 1354: 1353: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1337: 1333: 1328: 1325: 1318: 1313: 1311: 1306: 1304: 1299: 1298: 1295: 1288: 1287: 1282: 1277: 1268: 1259: 1250: 1241: 1240:CourtListener 1232: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1211:at Wikisource 1210: 1205: 1201: 1200: 1196: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1170: 1164: 1161: 1155: 1152: 1137: 1133: 1128: 1127: 1125: 1119: 1113: 1097: 1090: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1074: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1057: 1054: 1050: 1049: 1044: 1042: 1034: 1031: 1025: 1022: 1018: 1012: 1009: 1005: 1001: 996: 990: 987: 983: 979: 974: 968: 965: 961: 957: 952: 946: 943: 939: 935: 929: 926: 914: 910: 906: 902: 895: 892: 880: 876: 869: 866: 854: 850: 843: 840: 828: 824: 817: 814: 808: 804: 801: 799: 796: 794: 791: 789: 786: 784: 781: 780: 776: 774: 771: 766: 762: 757: 754: 753:Wendy Kaminer 750: 746: 745: 740: 738: 734: 730: 726: 722: 721: 716: 715: 710: 706: 699: 697: 695: 691: 682: 680: 678: 674: 670: 666: 662: 658: 657: 651: 649: 644: 640: 639: 634: 630: 625: 623: 618: 614: 610: 606: 601: 598: 594: 592: 588: 584: 580: 576: 572: 571: 566: 565: 559: 556: 551: 547: 545: 544: 539: 538: 529: 526: 521: 519: 518: 512: 510: 509:police powers 505: 503: 499: 494: 492: 488: 484: 483: 476: 474: 469: 465: 461: 457: 453: 449: 448: 439: 437: 431: 429: 426: 424: 420: 416: 412: 404: 402: 400: 399: 394: 390: 385: 383: 379: 378:Virginia Tech 374: 372: 368: 364: 360: 357:In 1994, the 352: 350: 348: 343: 340: 334: 332: 328: 327: 323:. Along with 322: 318: 314: 310: 306: 302: 298: 297: 286: 281: 277: 273: 269: 265: 261: 257: 253: 249: 246:Case opinions 244: 239: 235: 231: 227: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 199: 195: 192: 189: 187: 184: 182:Chief Justice 181: 180: 178: 173: 167: 162: 159: 156: 152: 148: 144: 141: 137: 134: 130: 125: 122: 121:Oral argument 119: 115: 110: 106: 100: 99: 94: 91: 87: 83: 80: 76: 73: 69: 66: 63: 59: 52: 48: 38: 33: 27: 19: 5834: 5786:Valley Metro 5746: 5729: 5717: 5691: 5690: 5653: 5558:Lane Stadium 5523:Men's soccer 5470:Tech Triumph 5415:Metal rubber 5385:Pelikan tail 5174: 5114: 5106: 5098: 5090: 5082: 5074: 5066: 5058: 5050: 5041:of Section X 5016: 5008: 4999:of Section X 4970: 4962: 4954: 4946: 4938: 4930: 4922: 4914: 4906: 4898: 4890: 4882: 4874: 4866: 4858: 4850: 4842: 4834: 4815: 4805: 4769:Smith v. Doe 4767: 4759: 4751: 4743: 4735: 4727: 4719: 4711: 4703: 4695: 4687: 4673: 4649: 4641: 4633: 4625: 4617: 4609: 4592: 4569: 4561: 4553: 4545: 4537: 4529: 4491: 4483: 4475: 4453: 4445: 4437: 4429: 4421: 4413: 4405: 4397: 4389: 4381: 4373: 4365: 4357: 4349: 4341: 4333: 4325: 4317: 4309: 4301: 4293: 4285: 4277: 4269: 4261: 4253: 4245: 4237: 4229: 4221: 4213: 4205: 4197: 4189: 4181: 4173: 4165: 4157: 4149: 4141: 4133: 4125: 4117: 4109: 4101: 4093: 4085: 4077: 4069: 4061: 4053: 4045: 4037: 4029: 4021: 4013: 4005: 3997: 3989: 3981: 3973: 3966:patent cases 3951: 3943: 3935: 3927: 3919: 3911: 3903: 3895: 3887: 3879: 3871: 3863: 3855: 3847: 3839: 3831: 3823: 3815: 3807: 3785: 3777: 3769: 3761: 3753: 3745: 3737: 3729: 3721: 3713: 3705: 3697: 3689: 3681: 3673: 3665: 3657: 3649: 3641: 3633: 3625: 3617: 3609: 3601: 3593: 3572: 3564: 3558:Matal v. Tam 3556: 3548: 3540: 3532: 3524: 3516: 3508: 3500: 3492: 3484: 3476: 3468: 3447: 3439: 3418: 3410: 3388: 3380: 3372: 3364: 3356: 3348: 3340: 3332: 3324: 3316: 3308: 3300: 3292: 3284: 3276: 3255: 3247: 3239: 3231: 3223: 3215: 3207: 3199: 3191: 3170: 3162: 3154: 3146: 3138: 3117: 3109: 3101: 3093: 3085: 3077: 3069: 3061: 3053: 3045: 3037: 3029: 3021: 3013: 3005: 2997: 2989: 2981: 2973: 2965: 2957: 2949: 2941: 2933: 2912: 2904: 2896: 2888: 2880: 2872: 2864: 2856: 2848: 2840: 2832: 2824: 2816: 2808: 2787: 2779: 2771: 2763: 2755: 2747: 2739: 2731: 2709: 2701: 2693: 2685: 2677: 2669: 2647: 2639: 2631: 2623: 2602: 2594: 2586: 2539: 2531: 2521: 2482: 2474: 2466: 2459: 2458: 2450: 2442: 2434: 2426: 2418: 2410: 2402: 2394: 2386: 2378: 2370: 2362: 2354: 2346: 2338: 2330: 2322: 2314: 2306: 2298: 2290: 2282: 2274: 2266: 2258: 2250: 2242: 2234: 2226: 2218: 2210: 2202: 2194: 2186: 2178: 2170: 2162: 2154: 2146: 2138: 2130: 2122: 2114: 2095: 2087: 2079: 2071: 2063: 2055: 2047: 2039: 2031: 2023: 2015: 2007: 1999: 1991: 1983: 1975: 1967: 1959: 1951: 1943: 1935: 1927: 1919: 1911: 1903: 1895: 1887: 1879: 1871: 1863: 1855: 1847: 1839: 1831: 1823: 1815: 1807: 1799: 1756: 1748: 1740: 1732: 1724: 1716: 1708: 1700: 1692: 1684: 1676: 1666:Section VIII 1639: 1631: 1591: 1583: 1546: 1538: 1530: 1493: 1485: 1477: 1469: 1461: 1424: 1416: 1408: 1371: 1363: 1355: 1284: 1215: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1163: 1154: 1140:. Retrieved 1136:the original 1123: 1100:. Retrieved 1089: 1077: 1073: 1065: 1056: 1046: 1040: 1033: 1024: 1016: 1011: 994: 989: 972: 967: 950: 945: 937: 928: 916:. Retrieved 904: 894: 882:. Retrieved 878: 868: 856:. Retrieved 852: 842: 830:. Retrieved 826: 816: 764: 758: 748: 742: 741: 736: 728: 718: 712: 708: 704: 703: 686: 676: 672: 668: 664: 660: 654: 652: 647: 642: 636: 632: 628: 626: 621: 616: 612: 608: 604: 602: 596: 595: 590: 582: 574: 568: 562: 560: 554: 552: 548: 541: 535: 533: 523: 515: 513: 506: 501: 497: 495: 490: 486: 480: 477: 472: 467: 463: 459: 455: 445: 443: 435: 427: 408: 396: 386: 375: 371:§ 13981 356: 347:David Souter 344: 335: 324: 295: 294: 293: 283:Laws applied 233: 221: 218:David Souter 209: 197: 150: 135: 127:Case history 96: 64: 26: 5742:Hokie Stone 5638:BCB Airport 4676:Laws Clause 2533:Knox v. Lee 1573:Section VII 1006: 1999). 984: 1997). 962: 1996). 763:criticized 361:passed the 309:US Congress 259:Concurrence 71:Docket nos. 5851:Categories 5175:Located in 4599:Section IX 3461:Lanham Act 2156:In re Debs 1520:Section VI 1451:Section IV 1345:Section II 759:Professor 733:federalism 382:grand jury 353:Background 311:under the 109:U.S. LEXIS 107:658; 2000 5465:Old Hokie 5460:HokieBird 5441:Athletics 5355:Nanoknife 5350:DARwIn-OP 5188:Academics 4794:Section X 1327:Article I 918:March 18, 913:408640898 884:March 18, 858:March 19, 832:March 18, 700:Reactions 587:section 5 415:Rehnquist 105:L. Ed. 2d 85:Citations 5725:Radio IQ 5548:Softball 5543:Baseball 5518:Football 5483:football 5310:System G 5305:System X 5268:Research 3404:case law 2725:case law 2663:case law 1329:case law 1214:Text of 1172:Archived 1142:July 18, 1112:cite web 1102:July 18, 1041:Morrison 1004:4th Cir. 982:4th Cir. 960:W.D. Va. 909:ProQuest 905:ProQuest 777:See also 765:Morrison 749:Morrison 729:Morrison 705:Morrison 692:and the 661:Morrison 631:and the 629:Morrison 597:Morrison 473:Morrison 456:Morrison 315:and the 251:Majority 147:W.D. Va. 140:F. Supp. 117:Argument 5835:Founded 5759:History 5698:WUVT-FM 5479:overall 5405:eTBLAST 1231:Cornell 720:Garrett 707:, like 491:Wickard 421:or the 398:en banc 275:Dissent 267:Dissent 164:Holding 149:1996), 5837:: 1872 5800:People 5594:Campus 5485:, and 5420:NEXTOR 5119:(2018) 5111:(2009) 5103:(2003) 5095:(1998) 5087:(1985) 5079:(1894) 5071:(1893) 5063:(1871) 5055:(1855) 5021:(1951) 5013:(1827) 4975:(2018) 4967:(1987) 4959:(1983) 4951:(1983) 4943:(1978) 4935:(1977) 4927:(1965) 4919:(1935) 4911:(1934) 4903:(1921) 4895:(1898) 4887:(1880) 4879:(1843) 4871:(1837) 4863:(1827) 4855:(1819) 4847:(1819) 4839:(1810) 4828:Others 4820:(1870) 4772:(2003) 4764:(1997) 4756:(1989) 4748:(1964) 4740:(1960) 4732:(1951) 4724:(1925) 4716:(1898) 4708:(1866) 4700:(1819) 4692:(1798) 4654:(2020) 4646:(2008) 4638:(2001) 4630:(1944) 4622:(1861) 4614:(1807) 4574:(2013) 4566:(2010) 4558:(2005) 4550:(2004) 4542:(1926) 4534:(1819) 4496:(2020) 4488:(1938) 4480:(1915) 4466:Other 4458:(2019) 4450:(2017) 4442:(2016) 4434:(2015) 4426:(2015) 4418:(2014) 4410:(2014) 4402:(2013) 4394:(2013) 4386:(2013) 4378:(2013) 4370:(2012) 4362:(2012) 4354:(2011) 4346:(2011) 4338:(2011) 4330:(2010) 4322:(2008) 4314:(2007) 4306:(2007) 4298:(2007) 4290:(2006) 4282:(2006) 4274:(2006) 4266:(2005) 4258:(2002) 4250:(2001) 4242:(1999) 4234:(1999) 4226:(1998) 4218:(1997) 4210:(1996) 4202:(1990) 4194:(1989) 4186:(1981) 4178:(1980) 4170:(1978) 4162:(1976) 4154:(1976) 4146:(1973) 4138:(1972) 4130:(1971) 4122:(1969) 4114:(1969) 4106:(1966) 4098:(1966) 4090:(1966) 4082:(1965) 4074:(1964) 4066:(1964) 4058:(1964) 4050:(1961) 4042:(1950) 4034:(1950) 4026:(1948) 4018:(1945) 4010:(1943) 4002:(1942) 3994:(1926) 3986:(1916) 3978:(1908) 3964:Other 3956:(1975) 3948:(1974) 3940:(1973) 3932:(1968) 3924:(1962) 3916:(1960) 3908:(1949) 3900:(1939) 3892:(1939) 3884:(1936) 3876:(1934) 3868:(1932) 3860:(1931) 3852:(1923) 3844:(1919) 3836:(1918) 3828:(1914) 3820:(1912) 3812:(1911) 3798:Other 3790:(2020) 3782:(2020) 3774:(2019) 3766:(2019) 3758:(2017) 3750:(2014) 3742:(2014) 3734:(2013) 3726:(2012) 3718:(2010) 3710:(2005) 3702:(2003) 3694:(2001) 3686:(1998) 3678:(1998) 3670:(1996) 3662:(1994) 3654:(1994) 3646:(1991) 3638:(1990) 3630:(1989) 3622:(1985) 3614:(1985) 3606:(1984) 3598:(1977) 3577:(2020) 3569:(2019) 3561:(2017) 3553:(2014) 3545:(2014) 3537:(2003) 3529:(2003) 3521:(2001) 3513:(2001) 3505:(1999) 3497:(1995) 3489:(1992) 3481:(1987) 3473:(1982) 3452:(1985) 3444:(1941) 3423:(1942) 3415:(1917) 3393:(1973) 3385:(1964) 3377:(1956) 3369:(1954) 3361:(1952) 3353:(1943) 3345:(1940) 3337:(1939) 3329:(1935) 3321:(1931) 3313:(1923) 3305:(1920) 3297:(1917) 3289:(1914) 3281:(1911) 3260:(1911) 3252:(1911) 3244:(1909) 3236:(1909) 3228:(1908) 3220:(1908) 3212:(1907) 3204:(1903) 3196:(1896) 3175:(1979) 3167:(1948) 3159:(1941) 3151:(1939) 3143:(1913) 3122:(1912) 3114:(1909) 3106:(1908) 3098:(1908) 3090:(1908) 3082:(1908) 3074:(1907) 3066:(1907) 3058:(1907) 3050:(1903) 3042:(1903) 3034:(1899) 3026:(1899) 3018:(1892) 3010:(1891) 3002:(1889) 2994:(1888) 2986:(1888) 2978:(1888) 2970:(1884) 2962:(1884) 2954:(1881) 2946:(1879) 2938:(1879) 2917:(1903) 2909:(1903) 2901:(1899) 2893:(1899) 2885:(1899) 2877:(1891) 2869:(1888) 2861:(1879) 2853:(1872) 2845:(1856) 2837:(1854) 2829:(1853) 2821:(1849) 2813:(1834) 2792:(1885) 2784:(1885) 2776:(1881) 2768:(1878) 2760:(1876) 2752:(1853) 2744:(1851) 2736:(1829) 2714:(1938) 2706:(1913) 2698:(1894) 2690:(1885) 2682:(1885) 2674:(1815) 2652:(1822) 2644:(1822) 2636:(1818) 2628:(1810) 2607:(1908) 2599:(1872) 2591:(1834) 2544:(1884) 2536:(1871) 2487:(2016) 2479:(2012) 2471:(2005) 2463:(2000) 2455:(2000) 2447:(2000) 2439:(2000) 2431:(1996) 2423:(1995) 2415:(1992) 2407:(1985) 2399:(1983) 2391:(1981) 2383:(1981) 2375:(1976) 2367:(1968) 2359:(1964) 2351:(1964) 2343:(1960) 2335:(1951) 2327:(1950) 2319:(1949) 2311:(1946) 2303:(1944) 2295:(1942) 2287:(1942) 2279:(1941) 2271:(1940) 2263:(1938) 2255:(1937) 2247:(1936) 2239:(1935) 2231:(1935) 2223:(1935) 2215:(1923) 2207:(1918) 2199:(1914) 2191:(1913) 2183:(1911) 2175:(1903) 2167:(1895) 2159:(1895) 2151:(1888) 2143:(1885) 2135:(1869) 2127:(1849) 2119:(1824) 2108:Others 2100:(2023) 2092:(2019) 2084:(2018) 2076:(2015) 2068:(2008) 2060:(2007) 2052:(2005) 2044:(1994) 2036:(1994) 2028:(1994) 2020:(1992) 2012:(1992) 2004:(1989) 1996:(1986) 1988:(1984) 1980:(1983) 1972:(1982) 1964:(1981) 1956:(1980) 1948:(1978) 1940:(1978) 1932:(1977) 1924:(1977) 1916:(1976) 1908:(1970) 1900:(1967) 1892:(1959) 1884:(1954) 1876:(1951) 1868:(1945) 1860:(1941) 1852:(1935) 1844:(1925) 1836:(1905) 1828:(1886) 1820:(1852) 1812:(1829) 1804:(1827) 1761:(2012) 1753:(2004) 1745:(1987) 1737:(1937) 1729:(1936) 1721:(1922) 1713:(1916) 1705:(1895) 1697:(1881) 1689:(1871) 1681:(1796) 1644:(1998) 1636:(1983) 1628:(1929) 1596:(1990) 1588:(1911) 1551:(1972) 1543:(1966) 1535:(1881) 1498:(2023) 1490:(2015) 1482:(1995) 1474:(1932) 1466:(1879) 1429:(2001) 1421:(1995) 1413:(1969) 1376:(2020) 1368:(2019) 1360:(2002) 1279:  1273:  1270:  1264:  1261:  1258:Justia 1255:  1252:  1246:  1243:  1237:  1234:  1228:  1017:Morgan 1002: ( 998:, 980: ( 976:, 958: ( 954:, 911:  853:Justia 717:, and 709:Boerne 677:Morgan 673:Morgan 669:Morgan 665:Boerne 648:Boerne 643:Boerne 591:Harris 405:Ruling 369:  262:Thomas 236: 234:· 232:  224: 222:· 220:  212: 210:· 208:  200: 198:· 196:  153:, 169 138:, 935 1222: 809:Notes 737:Lopez 714:Kimel 502:Lopez 498:Lopez 487:Lopez 468:Lopez 464:Lopez 460:Lopez 170:harm. 151:aff'd 132:Prior 79:99-29 5713:WBRW 5708:HEVT 5703:WVTF 5647:Life 5375:VTLS 5365:LibX 5335:PATH 5325:e-58 1396:and 1224:U.S. 1144:2018 1118:link 1104:2018 920:2022 886:2022 860:2022 834:2022 387:The 155:F.3d 98:more 90:U.S. 88:529 75:99-5 5395:NIA 5345:VLA 4792:of 4597:of 1664:of 1571:of 1518:of 1449:of 1398:III 1343:of 1220:529 1178:", 1122:", 1064:", 1039:Is 936:", 319:'s 158:820 143:779 93:598 5853:: 5481:, 5177:: 1218:, 1114:}} 1110:{{ 1080:, 907:. 903:. 877:. 851:. 825:. 711:, 475:. 5489:) 5477:( 5156:e 5149:t 5142:v 1316:e 1309:t 1302:v 1146:. 1120:) 1106:. 1051:) 922:. 888:. 862:. 836:. 145:( 101:) 95:( 20:)

Index

Christy Brzonkala
Supreme Court of the United States
99-5
99-29
U.S.
598
more
L. Ed. 2d
U.S. LEXIS
Oral argument
F. Supp.
779
W.D. Va.
F.3d
820
William Rehnquist
John P. Stevens
Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy
David Souter
Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer
U.S. Supreme Court
Violence Against Women Act of 1994
US Congress
Commerce Clause
Fourteenth Amendment
Equal Protection Clause

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑