Knowledge (XXG)

Competent tribunal

Source đź“ť

154:
often be of subordinate rank. The matter should be taken to a court, as persons taking part in the fight without the right to do so are liable to be prosecuted for murder or attempted murder, and might even be sentenced to capital punishment (12). This suggestion was not unanimously accepted, however, as it was felt that to bring a person before a military tribunal might have more serious consequences than a decision to deprive him of the benefits afforded by the Convention (13). A further amendment was therefore made to the Stockholm text stipulating that a decision regarding persons whose status was in doubt would be taken by a 'competent tribunal', and not specifically a military tribunal.
317:'s dossier was accidentally declassified. Critics examined its contents. It was hundreds of pages long. All but one of the documents in Kurnaz's dossier established his innocence—established that there was no reason to believe he had any association with terrorism. The lone exception was unsigned, and contained only a vague accusation. This lone memo did not supply any evidence to back up its accusation that Kurnaz was acquainted with a suicide bomber—and the memo didn't even get that suicide bomber's name correctly. 38: 200:; a written record of proceedings; proceedings shall be open with certain exceptions; persons whose status is to be determined shall be advised of their rights at the beginning of their hearings, allowed to attend all open sessions, allowed to call witnesses if reasonably available, and to question those witnesses called by the Tribunal, and to have a right to testify; and a tribunal shall determine status by a 156:
Another change was made in the text of the paragraph, as drafted at Stockholm, in order to specify that it applies to cases of doubt as to whether persons having committed a belligerent act and having fallen into the hands of the enemy belong to any of the categories enumerated in Article 4 (14). The
309:
The Bush administration tried to keep secret the identity of all the Guantanamo detainees. But some detainees' identities leaked out. Sympathetic lawyers secured permission from those detainees' families, and mounted legal challenges to try to secure their human rights. The Bush administration
153:
At Geneva in 1949, it was first proposed that for the sake of precision the term 'responsible authority' should be replaced by 'military tribunal' (11). This amendment was based on the view that decisions which might have the gravest consequences should Hot be left to a single person, who might
340:
For this, and other reasons, opponents argued that the Combatant Status Review Tribunals do not constitute a competent tribunal as mandated by the Geneva Convention. The Supreme Court ruled in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld that this was irrelevant, but it also ruled that the CSRT was not legal without
374: 320:
Critics argued that since a single vague accusation had been enough to keep a detainee imprisoned, if one assumed his case was typical, it was reasonable to believe that many other detainees the reviews determined were illegal combatants may have been just as questionable.
159:
It therefore seems to us that this provision should not be interpreted too restrictively; the reference in the Convention to 'a belligerent act' relates to the principle which motivated the person who committed it, and not merely the manner in which the act was committed.
264:
Critics claimed that signatories to the Geneva Conventions, like the United States, are obliged to treat all captured combatants as if they qualified for POW status, until a "competent tribunal" considers their case and determines that they don't qualify for POW status.
150:"Should any doubt arise whether any of these persons belongs to one of the categories named in the said Article, that person shall have the benefit of the present Convention until his or her status has been determined by some responsible authority" (10). 234:, some detainees initially categorized as POWs were found to be innocent civilians who had surrendered to receive free food and lodging. 1,196 tribunals were convened, of which 310 individuals were granted POW status. The remaining 886 detainees 146:
The provision a new one; it was inserted in the Convention at the request of the International Committee of the Red Cross. The International Committee submitted the following text, which was approved at the Stockholm Conference:
334: 328:
conducted by lawyers for detainees found that 92% of detainees in Guantanamo Bay were not "al-Qaeda fighters" and they argue that the CSRT's were severely biased against suspects in favor of determining them
110:
Should any doubt arise as to whether persons, having committed a belligerent act and having fallen into the hands of the enemy, belong to any of the categories enumerated in
48: 215:
Recommended Retained Personnel (RP), entitled to EPW protections, who should be considered for certification as a medical, religious, or volunteer aid society RP.
337:
reveals that those 92% who are not "al-Qaeda fighters" were deemed to be either other al-Qaeda members or Taliban or members of other affiliated hostile groups.
488: 398: 130: 114:, such persons shall enjoy the protection of the present Convention until such time as their status has been determined by a competent tribunal. 254: 513: 444: 257:
did not fall within that purview. As such, President Bush stated that fighters captured in the war in Afghanistan would be treated as "
236:"were determined to be displaced civilians and were treated as refugees. No civilian was found to have acted as an unlawful combatant." 221:
Civilian Internee who for reasons of operational security, or probable cause incident to criminal investigation, should be detained.
82: 413: 342: 303: 273: 111: 99: 435: 542: 64: 157:
clarification contained in Article 4 should, of course, reduce the number of doubtful cases in any future conflict.
144:
This would apply to deserters, and to persons who accompany the armed forces and have lost their identity card.
489:
Panel Ignored Evidence on Detainee: U.S. Military Intelligence, German Authorities Found No Ties to Terrorists
103: 60: 354: 313:
The reviews determined only 38 detainees were not illegal combatants. Then, through some kind of mix-up,
522: 201: 197: 493: 375:
Military Police: Enemy Prisoners of War, Retained Personnel, Civilian Internees and Other Detainees
293: 359: 330: 289: 277: 269: 258: 164:(10) See ' XVIIth International Red Cross Conference, Draft Revised or New Conventions, ' p. 54; 510: 276:, it also determined that these detainees were due the rights accorded under the more limited 167:(11) See ' Final Record of the Diplomatic Conference of Geneva of 1949, ' Vol. II-A, p. 388; 325: 517: 439: 393: 394:
Commentary on Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Article 5
246: 536: 506: 299: 250: 477:
If Colin Powell prevails, a tribunal would have to determine the detainees' status.
462: 364: 314: 133:(ICRC) commentary on Article 5 of the Third Geneva Convention says on the issue of 414:
Enemy Prisoners of War, Retained Personnel, Civilian Internees and Other Detainees
17: 253:
would follow the Geneva Conventions as it was strictly interpreted, and that the
369: 218:
Innocent civilian who should be immediately returned to his home or released.
458: 432: 418: 272:. Although it ruled against the Bush administration on the legality of the 241:"Competent tribunals" in the context of the detainees held at Guantanamo Bay 280:. It reserved judgement on Article 5 with its competent tribunals. 231: 310:
lost, and was forced to institute Combatant Status Review Tribunal.
192:
Under U.S. military regulations, a Tribunal would be composed of:
511:
Report on Guantanamo detainees: A Profile of 517 Detainees (.pdf)
182:
International Committee of the Red Cross commentary on Article 5
466: 31: 245:
This term began to receive a lot of attention when President
47:
deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a
433:
Conduct of the Persian Gulf War: Final Report to Congress
268:
The Supreme Court set aside this question in the case of
284:
Combatant Status Review Tribunal as competent tribunals
56: 141:PARAGRAPH 2. -- PERSONS WHOSE STATUS IS IN DOUBT 139: 108: 226:"Competent tribunals" during the 1991 Gulf War 341:congressional authorization. In response the 45:The examples and perspective in this article 8: 302:ruling, the Bush administration began using 409: 407: 83:Learn how and when to remove this message 131:International Committee of the Red Cross 27:Term used in the Third Geneva Convention 386: 306:to determine the status of detainees. 125:ICRC commentary on competent tribunals 119:Third Geneva Convention Article 5, ¶ 2 170:(12) Ibid., Vol. III, p. 63, No. 95; 7: 463:"Rift in Bush's team over detainees" 25: 304:Combatant Status Review Tribunals 36: 274:Guantanamo military commissions 173:(13) Ibid., Vol. II-B, p. 270; 1: 208:Possible determinations are: 59:, discuss the issue on the 559: 287: 202:preponderance of evidence 176:(14) Ibid., pp. 270-271; 343:Military Commissions Act 104:Third Geneva Convention 355:Command responsibility 212:Enemy Prisoner of War. 185: 122: 523:Seton Hall University 445:Department of Defense 278:Common Article 3 198:commissioned officers 438:May 2, 2006, at the 65:create a new article 57:improve this article 494:The Washington Post 461:(29 January 2002). 423:, October 1997 331:unlawful combatants 298:Following the 2004 294:No-hearing hearings 259:unlawful combatants 249:announced that the 102:paragraph 2 of the 543:Geneva Conventions 526:, February 8, 2006 516:2007-03-03 at the 360:Geneva Conventions 326:Seton Hall studies 290:Unlawful combatant 270:Hamdan v. Rumsfeld 255:war in Afghanistan 135:competent tribunal 98:is a term used in 96:Competent Tribunal 18:Competent Tribunal 93: 92: 85: 67:, as appropriate. 16:(Redirected from 550: 527: 504: 498: 497:, March 27, 2005 486: 480: 479: 474: 473: 455: 449: 430: 424: 421:Regulation 190-8 411: 402: 391: 230:During the 1991 183: 120: 106:, which states: 88: 81: 77: 74: 68: 40: 39: 32: 21: 558: 557: 553: 552: 551: 549: 548: 547: 533: 532: 531: 530: 518:Wayback Machine 505: 501: 487: 483: 471: 469: 457: 456: 452: 440:Wayback Machine 431: 427: 412: 405: 392: 388: 383: 351: 296: 288:Main articles: 286: 243: 228: 190: 184: 181: 158: 155: 145: 127: 121: 118: 89: 78: 72: 69: 54: 41: 37: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 556: 554: 546: 545: 535: 534: 529: 528: 499: 481: 450: 425: 403: 385: 384: 382: 379: 378: 377: 372: 367: 362: 357: 350: 347: 285: 282: 247:George W. Bush 242: 239: 227: 224: 223: 222: 219: 216: 213: 206: 205: 189: 186: 179: 178: 177: 174: 171: 168: 165: 126: 123: 116: 91: 90: 51:of the subject 49:worldwide view 44: 42: 35: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 555: 544: 541: 540: 538: 525: 524: 519: 515: 512: 508: 507:Mark Denbeaux 503: 500: 496: 495: 490: 485: 482: 478: 468: 464: 460: 454: 451: 447: 446: 441: 437: 434: 429: 426: 422: 420: 415: 410: 408: 404: 401: 400: 395: 390: 387: 380: 376: 373: 371: 368: 366: 363: 361: 358: 356: 353: 352: 348: 346: 345:was adopted. 344: 338: 336: 332: 327: 324:Further, the 322: 318: 316: 311: 307: 305: 301: 300:Rasul v. Bush 295: 291: 283: 281: 279: 275: 271: 266: 262: 260: 256: 252: 251:United States 248: 240: 238: 237: 233: 225: 220: 217: 214: 211: 210: 209: 203: 199: 195: 194: 193: 188:United States 187: 175: 172: 169: 166: 163: 162: 161: 151: 148: 142: 138: 136: 132: 124: 115: 113: 107: 105: 101: 97: 87: 84: 76: 66: 62: 58: 52: 50: 43: 34: 33: 30: 19: 521: 502: 492: 484: 476: 470:. Retrieved 453: 443: 442:(page 663), 428: 417: 397: 389: 365:Jus in bello 339: 335:study itself 323: 319: 315:Murat Kurnaz 312: 308: 297: 267: 263: 244: 235: 229: 207: 191: 152: 149: 143: 140: 134: 128: 109: 95: 94: 79: 70: 46: 29: 73:August 2023 472:2008-02-19 448:April 1992 381:References 370:UN Charter 459:Jon Leyne 419:U.S. Army 112:Article 4 100:Article 5 61:talk page 537:Category 514:Archived 509:et al., 436:Archived 349:See also 232:Gulf War 180:—  117:—  55:You may 333:. The 196:Three 137:that: 63:, or 399:ICRC 292:and 129:The 467:BBC 261:". 539:: 520:, 491:, 475:. 465:. 416:, 406:^ 396:, 204:. 86:) 80:( 75:) 71:( 53:. 20:)

Index

Competent Tribunal
worldwide view
improve this article
talk page
create a new article
Learn how and when to remove this message
Article 5
Third Geneva Convention
Article 4
International Committee of the Red Cross
commissioned officers
preponderance of evidence
Gulf War
George W. Bush
United States
war in Afghanistan
unlawful combatants
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
Guantanamo military commissions
Common Article 3
Unlawful combatant
No-hearing hearings
Rasul v. Bush
Combatant Status Review Tribunals
Murat Kurnaz
Seton Hall studies
unlawful combatants
study itself
Military Commissions Act
Command responsibility

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑