172:
The House of Lords unanimously disapproved the Court of Appeal's decision, that "assumption of responsibility" was indistinct and subsumed into the law of negligence. It held, however, that in this case, because the bank was required by law to comply with the freezing order, there could not be said
138:
needed to freeze the bank account of a
Barclays customer. By law, banks are required to comply with requests for freezing orders and are paid for the service. When it received the request, the bank replied that it would abide. But due to "operator error", the customer proceeded to empty all of the
139:
money from the account. Customs and Excise sued
Barclays for the amount that was lost along with the interest. Barclays argued it had no duty of care, nor had it assumed responsibility.
183:
test, it was held to not be fair, just and reasonable to impose liability. The bank was therefore not required to reimburse
Customs and Excise for the dissipated money.
251:
256:
160:
241:
246:
261:
92:
226:
82:
Lord
Bingham of Cornhill, Lord Hoffmann, Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Lord Mance
120:
135:
213:
124:
116:
67:
63:
152:
Peter Gibson LJ, Longmore LJ, Lindsay LJ held that there was no duty and proposed that
235:
175:
154:
112:
48:
158:
type assumption of responsibility should be subsumed into the threefold test from
209:
192:
212:
and P Mitchell, 'Negligence
Liability for Pure Economic Loss' (2005) 121
109:
Her
Majesty's Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Barclays Bank Plc
97:
173:to have arisen any assumption of responsibility on
86:
78:
73:
59:
54:
44:
36:
28:
23:
8:
20:
227:Judgment from the House of Lords website
24:Customs and Excise v Barclays Bank Plc
7:
14:
252:2006 in United Kingdom case law
161:Caparo Industries plc v Dickman
1:
101:test, negligent misstatement
93:Assumption of responsibility
179:grounds. Applying then the
278:
16:2006 English tort law case
91:
257:HM Revenue and Customs
121:negligent misstatement
242:English tort case law
247:House of Lords cases
262:Barclays litigation
136:Customs and Excise
125:pure economic loss
105:
104:
269:
119:case concerning
117:English tort law
74:Court membership
21:
277:
276:
272:
271:
270:
268:
267:
266:
232:
231:
223:
206:
201:
189:
170:
150:
148:Court of Appeal
145:
133:
68:EWHC 122 (Comm)
17:
12:
11:
5:
275:
273:
265:
264:
259:
254:
249:
244:
234:
233:
230:
229:
222:
221:External links
219:
218:
217:
205:
202:
200:
197:
196:
195:
188:
185:
169:
168:House of Lords
166:
149:
146:
144:
141:
132:
129:
103:
102:
89:
88:
84:
83:
80:
79:Judges sitting
76:
75:
71:
70:
61:
57:
56:
52:
51:
46:
42:
41:
38:
34:
33:
32:House of Lords
30:
26:
25:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
274:
263:
260:
258:
255:
253:
250:
248:
245:
243:
240:
239:
237:
228:
225:
224:
220:
215:
211:
208:
207:
203:
198:
194:
191:
190:
186:
184:
182:
178:
177:
167:
165:
163:
162:
157:
156:
147:
142:
140:
137:
130:
128:
126:
122:
118:
115:is a leading
114:
111:
110:
100:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
72:
69:
65:
64:EWCA Civ 1555
62:
60:Prior actions
58:
53:
50:
47:
43:
39:
35:
31:
27:
22:
19:
180:
176:Hedley Byrne
174:
171:
159:
155:Hedley Byrne
153:
151:
134:
108:
107:
106:
96:
55:Case history
40:21 June 2006
18:
236:Categories
210:C Mitchell
204:References
193:Negligence
187:See also
143:Judgment
87:Keywords
45:Citation
216:194-200
113:UKHL 28
49:UKHL 28
37:Decided
181:Caparo
98:Caparo
199:Notes
131:Facts
29:Court
123:and
214:LQR
66:,
238::
164:.
127:.
95:,
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.